搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

倒Y型四能级系统中吸收谱线的窄化极限研究

邸凤清 贾宁 钱静

引用本文:
Citation:

倒Y型四能级系统中吸收谱线的窄化极限研究

邸凤清, 贾宁, 钱静

Narrowing the absorption linewidth and its limitation in a four-level inverted-Y atomic system

Di Feng-Qing, Jia Ning, Qian Jing
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 基于倒Y型四能级系统, 理论研究了探测光吸收谱线的线宽窄化极限. 发现得益于中间激发态与另一超精细基态之间施加的第三束控制光, 线宽窄化极限的限制条件转变为两个基态能级之间的相干衰减率, 而非基态与高激发态之间. 与传统的梯型结构相比, 吸收光谱线宽的窄化极限能够提高2个数量级. 研究表明, 通过适当调节这束控制光的拉比频率和失谐量, 可以获得兼具超窄线宽和高对比度的吸收光谱信号. 数值计算结果与理论分析完全相符. 此外, 还讨论了吸收谱线对光场的响应规律和多普勒效应的影响. 对原子热运动的研究发现, 倒Y模型由于缺少三光子作用的过程而无法完全消除多普勒增宽的影响. 借助传播光场的优化设计可以减小多普勒效应的影响, 在有限温度下获得较窄的吸收谱线. 本文的研究成果对高分辨光谱学的实验发展具有重要的指导意义.
    Depending on a four-level inverted-Y atomic system, we demonstrate the limitation of linewidth-narrowing for the probe absorption spectrum in the electromagnetic induced absorption platform. Thanks to the use of an auxiliary control field which couples one hyperfine ground state and one middle-excited state we show that the linewidth limitation can be constrained by a coherence decay rate between two hyperfine ground states, rather than by the decay rate between the ground and the excited states as in previous Ladder schemes. That fact makes the theoretically-predicted absorption linewidth at least two orders of magnitude narrower. By using a suitable adjustment for the control-field amplitude and the detuning we numerically show that an extremely-narrowed probe absorption spectrum accompanied by a higher spectra contrast can be obtained, which confirms well with our theoretical predictions. We study the transient time response to the absorption spectrum and show that a relatively longer response time arises due to the small coherence decay rate between two hyperfine ground states. Furthermore, we reduce the influence on linewidth-narrowing from the Doppler effect via an optimized design of lasers, and reveal that no Doppler-free effect exists due to the lack of three-photon process. Our results may pave a route to the development of high-resolution spectroscopy in current experiments.
      通信作者: 贾宁, jianing09@gmail.com ; 钱静, jqian@phy.ecnu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12174106, 11474094, 12104308)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Jia Ning, jianing09@gmail.com ; Qian Jing, jqian@phy.ecnu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12174106, 11474094, 12104308)
    [1]

    Hartmann J M, Sironneau V, Boulet C, Svensson T, Hodges J T, Xu C T 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 032510Google Scholar

    [2]

    Thomas T D, Kukk E, Ueda K, Ouchi T, Sakai K, Carroll T X, Nicolas C, Travnikova O, Miron C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 193009Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lukin M D, Fleischhauer M, Zibrov A S, Robinson H G, Velichansky V L, Hollberg L, Scully M O 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 2959Google Scholar

    [4]

    Lambo R, Xu C Y, Pratt S T, Xu H, Zappala J C, Bailey K G, Lu Z T, Mueller P, O’Connor T P, Kamorzin B B, Bezrukov D S, Xie Y Q, Buchachenko A A, Singh J T 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 062809Google Scholar

    [5]

    Budker D, Yashchuk V, Zolotorev M 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 5788Google Scholar

    [6]

    Iftiquar S M, Karve G R, Natarajan V 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 063807Google Scholar

    [7]

    Tay J W, Farr W G, Ledingham P M, Korystov D, Longdell J J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 063824Google Scholar

    [8]

    Narducci L M, Scully M O, Oppo G L, Ru P, Tredicce J R 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 1630Google Scholar

    [9]

    Gauthier D J, Zhu Y, Mossberg T W 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 2460Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhu Y, Wasserlauf T N 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 3653Google Scholar

    [11]

    Rapol U D, Wasan A, Natarajan V 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 053802Google Scholar

    [12]

    Iftiquar S M, Natarajan V 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 013808Google Scholar

    [13]

    Ye C Y, Zibrov A S, Rostovtsev Y, Scully M O 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 043805Google Scholar

    [14]

    Goren C, Wilson-Gordon A D, Rosenbluh M, Friedmann H 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 063802Google Scholar

    [15]

    Yang L J, Zhang L S, Zhuang Z H, Guo Q L, Fu G S 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 2147Google Scholar

    [16]

    Mondal S, Ghosh A, Islam K, Bandyopadhyay A 2019 Laser Phys. 29 075204Google Scholar

    [17]

    Mu Y, Qin L, Shi Z Y, Huang G X 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 043709Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hou B P, Wang S J, Yu W L, Sun W L 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 053805Google Scholar

    [19]

    Dutta B K, Mahapatra P K 2008 J. Phys. B 41 055501Google Scholar

    [20]

    Qi J B 2010 Phys. Scr. 81 015402Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ghosh A, Islam K, Bhattacharyya D, Bandyopadhyay A 2016 J. Phys. B 49 195401Google Scholar

    [22]

    Liao K Y, Tu H T, Yang S Z, Chen C J, Liu X H, Liang J, Zhang X D, Yan H, Zhu S L 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 053432Google Scholar

    [23]

    Naweed A, Farca G, Shopova S I, Rosenberger A T 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 043804Google Scholar

    [24]

    Stassi R, Macrì V, Kockum A F, Stefano O D, Miranowicz A, Savasta S, Nori F 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 023818Google Scholar

    [25]

    Adhikari P, Hafezi M, Taylor J M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 060503Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chai X, Ropagnol X, Raeis-Zadeh S M, Reid M, Safavi-Naeini S, Ozaki T 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 143901Google Scholar

    [27]

    Prehn A, Ibrügger M, Rempe G, Zeppenfeld M 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 173602Google Scholar

    [28]

    Gustin C, Hanschke L, Boos K, Müller J R A, Kremser M, Finley J J, Hughes S, Müller K 2021 Phys. Rev. Res. 3 013044Google Scholar

    [29]

    Rose W, Haas H, Chen A Q, Jeon N, Lauhon L J, Cory D G, Budakian R 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 011030

    [30]

    Yan D, Liu Y M, Bao Q Q, Fu C B, Wu J H 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 023828Google Scholar

    [31]

    Li Y, Xiao M 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 4959Google Scholar

    [32]

    Giner L, Veissier L, Sparkes B, Sheremet A S, Nicolas A, Mishina O S, Scherman M, Burks S, Shomroni I, Kupriyanov D V, Lam P K, Giacobino E, Laurat J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013823Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhu C J, Tan C H, Huang G X 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 043813Google Scholar

    [34]

    Anisimov P M, Dowling J P, Sanders B C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 163604Google Scholar

    [35]

    Sheng D, Pérez Galván A, Orozco L A 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 062506Google Scholar

    [36]

    Bharti V, Wasan A 2012 J. Phys. B 45 185501Google Scholar

    [37]

    周炳琨 2009 激光原理 (北京: 国防工业出版社) 第129页

    Zhou B K 2009 Laser Principle (Beijing: National Defense Industry Press) p129 (in Chinese)

    [38]

    Berman P R, Salomaa R 1982 Phys. Rev. A 25 2667Google Scholar

    [39]

    Schmidt-Eberle S, Stolz T, Rempe G, Dürr S 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 013421Google Scholar

    [40]

    Stiesdal N, Busche H, Kumlin J, Kleinbeck K, Büchler H P, Hofferberth S 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 043339Google Scholar

    [41]

    Pack M V, Camacho R M, Howell J C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 013801Google Scholar

    [42]

    Feng L, Li P X, Zhang M Z, Wang T, Xiao Y H 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 013815Google Scholar

    [43]

    Van Dyke J S, Kandel Y P, Qiao H F, Nichol J M, Economou S E, Barnes E 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 245303Google Scholar

    [44]

    Blok M S, Ramasesh V V, Schuster T, O’Brien K, Kreikebaum J M, Dahlen D, Morvan A, Yoshida B, Yao N Y, Siddiqi I 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11 021010

    [45]

    Zhang Y, Qiao J B, Yin L J, He L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 045413Google Scholar

    [46]

    de Boo G G, Yin C M, Rančić M, Johnson B C, McCallum J C, Sellars M J, Rogge S 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 155309Google Scholar

    [47]

    Longhi S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 015807Google Scholar

    [48]

    Yang Z J, Lustig E, Harari G, Plotnik Y, Lumer Y, Bandres M A, Segev M 2020 Phys. Rev. X 10 011059

    [49]

    Bai S Y, Bao Q Q, Tian X D, Liu Y M, Wu J H 2018 J. Phys. B 51 075502Google Scholar

    [50]

    Chen T L, Chang S Y, Huang Y J, Shukla K, Huang Y C, Suen T H, Kuan T Y, Shy J T, Liu Y W 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 052507Google Scholar

    [51]

    Tauschinsky A, Newell R, van Linden van den Heuvell H B, Spreeuw R J C 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 042522Google Scholar

    [52]

    Kou J, Wan R G, Kang Z H, Wang H H, Jiang L, Zhang X J, Jiang Y, Gao J Y 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 002035Google Scholar

    [53]

    Ryabtsev I I, Beterov I I, Tretyakov D B, Entin V M, Yakshina E A 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 053409Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a) 倒Y型四能级原子系统的裸态能级示意图; (b) 考虑$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}\ne 0 $时, 在满足$\varDelta +{\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}=0$的情况下缀饰态能级$ \left|\pm \rangle\right. $与基态$ \left|g\rangle\right. $发生耦合, 而能级$ \left|0\rangle\right. $由于不包含裸态$ \left|e\rangle\right. $, 故不与$ \left|g\rangle\right. $耦合; (c) 反映了不存在控制光$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $的情况下, 系统约化为三能级梯型结构所对应的缀饰态能级$\left|{\pm' }\rangle\right.$与基态$ \left|g\rangle\right. $之间的耦合

    Fig. 1.  (a) Schematic of an inverted-Y type four-level atomic system coupling with three light fields $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{p}}, {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{c}}, {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $; (b) for $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}\ne 0 $ and $\varDelta +{\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}=0$, the ground state $ \left|g\rangle\right. $ only couples with $ \left|\pm \rangle\right. $(dressed states); (c) While $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}=0 $, the system reduces to a three-level ladder structure where $ \left|g\rangle\right. $ couples with the other two dressed states $ \left|{\pm'}\rangle\right. $.

    图 2  (a) $ {\delta =\delta }_{+} $处吸收谱线的线宽$ {w}_{+D} $$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $的关系. 红色虚线是根据(6)式得到的理论结果, 蓝色实线是数值计算的结果. (b) $ {\delta =\delta }_{+} $处吸收谱线的对比度$ {\eta }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}} $$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $的依赖关系. 计算所取参数为$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{p}}=0.03 $, $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{c}}=0.3 $, $\varDelta =15$, $ {\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}=-15 $. 箭头所指位置表示对比度$ {\eta }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}} $达到0.99对应的$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $$ {w}_{+D} $的取值

    Fig. 2.  (a) Absorption linewidth $ {w}_{+D} $ vs the coupling-field Rabi frequency $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $. Theoretical (Eq. (6)) and numerical results are plotted by red-dashed and blue-solid curves, respectively. (b) Spectrum contrast $ {\eta }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}} $ vs $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $ for $ {\delta =\delta }_{+} $. Arrow shows the location of (${{\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}, w}_{+D}, {\eta }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}})= (1.1{\varGamma }_{e}, $$ 23\text{ KHz}, 0.99)$. Simulation parameters are $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{p}}=0.03 $, $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{c}}= $$ 0.3 $, $\varDelta =15$ and $ {\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}=-15 $.

    图 3  三能级梯型系统中, 在$\delta ={{\delta' _{+}}}$位置处吸收谱线线宽${{w'_{+D}}}$与控制光失谐量$ \left|{\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}\right| $的依赖关系. 这里取$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{p}}=0.03 $, $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{c}}=0.3 $

    Fig. 3.  In a three-level Ladder system the spectrum linewidth ${w'_{+D}}$ vs detuning $ \left|{\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}\right| $. Here $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{p}}=0.03 $, $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{c}}=0.3 $.

    图 4  $ \left(\mathrm{a}\right){\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}=0.5 $$ \left(\mathrm{b}\right){\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}=1.1 $两种情况下, $ \delta ={\delta }_{+} $处吸收谱线宽度$ {w}_{+D} $(蓝色实线)和对比度$ {\eta }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}} $(红色虚线)随失谐量$\varDelta$的变化关系. 其他参数和图2相同

    Fig. 4.  Dependence of spectrum linewidth $ {w}_{+D} $ (blue-solid) and contrast $ {\eta }_{contrast} $ (red-dashed) on the detuning $\varDelta$ under (a) $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}= $$ 0.5 $ and (b) $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}=1.1 $. Other parameters are same as in Fig. 2.

    图 5  (a)—(d)不同的$ {\delta }_{\mathrm{c}} $取值下, $ \delta ={\delta }_{+} $位置附近的吸收谱线. 这里取$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}=1.1 $, $\varDelta =15$, 其他参数和图2相同

    Fig. 5.  (a)–(d) Absorption spectrum around $ \delta ={\delta }_{+} $ for ${\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}=(-2\varDelta , -\varDelta , 0, \varDelta )$. Here we choose $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}=1.1 $ and $\varDelta =15$. Other parameters have been described in Fig. 2.

    图 6  考虑控制光场$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}\left(t\right) $$ t=200\text{ μ}\mathrm{s} $时开启, (a1)—(a3)当$ t=({t}_{1}, {t}_{2}, {t}_{3})=(100, \mathrm{250, 800})\text{ μ}\mathrm{s} $$ \delta ={\delta }_{+} $位置处的吸收谱线; (b) 该处吸收谱线的峰值高度M$ \mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}{\rho }_{\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}}\right) $随时间$ t $的变化. 当$ t < 200\text{ μ}\mathrm{s} $时, $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}\left(t\right)=0 $; 当$t\geqslant 200\text{ μ}\mathrm{s}$时, ${\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}\left(t\right)=6.6\text{ MHz}$

    Fig. 6.  In the case of a time-dependent control field which is $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}\left(t\right)=0 $ for $ t < 200\text{ μ}\mathrm{s} $ and ${\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}}\left(t\right)=6.6\text{ MHz}$ for $t\geqslant 200\text{ μ}\mathrm{s}$. (a1)–(a3) The absorption spectrum at $\delta ={\delta }_{+}\approx 90.12\text{ MHz}$ when $ t=({t}_{1}, {t}_{2}, {t}_{3})=(100, \mathrm{250, 800})\text{ μ}\mathrm{s}, $ respectively. (b) Time-dependent peak absorption $ \mathrm{M}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}{\rho }_{\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}}\right(t\left)\right) $ as a function of time t. The control field is turned on at $ t=200\text{ μ}\mathrm{s} $.

    图 7  不同的温度$T=\left({10}^{-2}, {10}^{-3}, 0\right)\text{ K}$下, (a) $ {w}_{+D} $和(b)$ {\eta }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}} $$ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $的依赖关系. 选取的参数是$\varDelta =90$ MHz, ${\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}=-\varDelta$, 其他和图2相同

    Fig. 7.  Under different temperatures $ T=\left({10}^{-2}, {10}^{-3}, 0\right) $K, (a) $ {w}_{+D} $ and (b) $ {\eta }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}} $ vs the control-field Rabi frequency $ {\varOmega }_{\mathrm{d}} $. Here $\varDelta =90$MHz and ${\delta }_{\mathrm{c}}=-\varDelta$ and others are the same as in Fig. 2.

  • [1]

    Hartmann J M, Sironneau V, Boulet C, Svensson T, Hodges J T, Xu C T 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 032510Google Scholar

    [2]

    Thomas T D, Kukk E, Ueda K, Ouchi T, Sakai K, Carroll T X, Nicolas C, Travnikova O, Miron C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 193009Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lukin M D, Fleischhauer M, Zibrov A S, Robinson H G, Velichansky V L, Hollberg L, Scully M O 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 2959Google Scholar

    [4]

    Lambo R, Xu C Y, Pratt S T, Xu H, Zappala J C, Bailey K G, Lu Z T, Mueller P, O’Connor T P, Kamorzin B B, Bezrukov D S, Xie Y Q, Buchachenko A A, Singh J T 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 062809Google Scholar

    [5]

    Budker D, Yashchuk V, Zolotorev M 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 5788Google Scholar

    [6]

    Iftiquar S M, Karve G R, Natarajan V 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 063807Google Scholar

    [7]

    Tay J W, Farr W G, Ledingham P M, Korystov D, Longdell J J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 063824Google Scholar

    [8]

    Narducci L M, Scully M O, Oppo G L, Ru P, Tredicce J R 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 1630Google Scholar

    [9]

    Gauthier D J, Zhu Y, Mossberg T W 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 2460Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhu Y, Wasserlauf T N 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 3653Google Scholar

    [11]

    Rapol U D, Wasan A, Natarajan V 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 053802Google Scholar

    [12]

    Iftiquar S M, Natarajan V 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 013808Google Scholar

    [13]

    Ye C Y, Zibrov A S, Rostovtsev Y, Scully M O 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 043805Google Scholar

    [14]

    Goren C, Wilson-Gordon A D, Rosenbluh M, Friedmann H 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 063802Google Scholar

    [15]

    Yang L J, Zhang L S, Zhuang Z H, Guo Q L, Fu G S 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 2147Google Scholar

    [16]

    Mondal S, Ghosh A, Islam K, Bandyopadhyay A 2019 Laser Phys. 29 075204Google Scholar

    [17]

    Mu Y, Qin L, Shi Z Y, Huang G X 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 043709Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hou B P, Wang S J, Yu W L, Sun W L 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 053805Google Scholar

    [19]

    Dutta B K, Mahapatra P K 2008 J. Phys. B 41 055501Google Scholar

    [20]

    Qi J B 2010 Phys. Scr. 81 015402Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ghosh A, Islam K, Bhattacharyya D, Bandyopadhyay A 2016 J. Phys. B 49 195401Google Scholar

    [22]

    Liao K Y, Tu H T, Yang S Z, Chen C J, Liu X H, Liang J, Zhang X D, Yan H, Zhu S L 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 053432Google Scholar

    [23]

    Naweed A, Farca G, Shopova S I, Rosenberger A T 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 043804Google Scholar

    [24]

    Stassi R, Macrì V, Kockum A F, Stefano O D, Miranowicz A, Savasta S, Nori F 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 023818Google Scholar

    [25]

    Adhikari P, Hafezi M, Taylor J M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 060503Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chai X, Ropagnol X, Raeis-Zadeh S M, Reid M, Safavi-Naeini S, Ozaki T 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 143901Google Scholar

    [27]

    Prehn A, Ibrügger M, Rempe G, Zeppenfeld M 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 173602Google Scholar

    [28]

    Gustin C, Hanschke L, Boos K, Müller J R A, Kremser M, Finley J J, Hughes S, Müller K 2021 Phys. Rev. Res. 3 013044Google Scholar

    [29]

    Rose W, Haas H, Chen A Q, Jeon N, Lauhon L J, Cory D G, Budakian R 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 011030

    [30]

    Yan D, Liu Y M, Bao Q Q, Fu C B, Wu J H 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 023828Google Scholar

    [31]

    Li Y, Xiao M 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 4959Google Scholar

    [32]

    Giner L, Veissier L, Sparkes B, Sheremet A S, Nicolas A, Mishina O S, Scherman M, Burks S, Shomroni I, Kupriyanov D V, Lam P K, Giacobino E, Laurat J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013823Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhu C J, Tan C H, Huang G X 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 043813Google Scholar

    [34]

    Anisimov P M, Dowling J P, Sanders B C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 163604Google Scholar

    [35]

    Sheng D, Pérez Galván A, Orozco L A 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 062506Google Scholar

    [36]

    Bharti V, Wasan A 2012 J. Phys. B 45 185501Google Scholar

    [37]

    周炳琨 2009 激光原理 (北京: 国防工业出版社) 第129页

    Zhou B K 2009 Laser Principle (Beijing: National Defense Industry Press) p129 (in Chinese)

    [38]

    Berman P R, Salomaa R 1982 Phys. Rev. A 25 2667Google Scholar

    [39]

    Schmidt-Eberle S, Stolz T, Rempe G, Dürr S 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 013421Google Scholar

    [40]

    Stiesdal N, Busche H, Kumlin J, Kleinbeck K, Büchler H P, Hofferberth S 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 043339Google Scholar

    [41]

    Pack M V, Camacho R M, Howell J C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 013801Google Scholar

    [42]

    Feng L, Li P X, Zhang M Z, Wang T, Xiao Y H 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 013815Google Scholar

    [43]

    Van Dyke J S, Kandel Y P, Qiao H F, Nichol J M, Economou S E, Barnes E 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 245303Google Scholar

    [44]

    Blok M S, Ramasesh V V, Schuster T, O’Brien K, Kreikebaum J M, Dahlen D, Morvan A, Yoshida B, Yao N Y, Siddiqi I 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11 021010

    [45]

    Zhang Y, Qiao J B, Yin L J, He L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 045413Google Scholar

    [46]

    de Boo G G, Yin C M, Rančić M, Johnson B C, McCallum J C, Sellars M J, Rogge S 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 155309Google Scholar

    [47]

    Longhi S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 015807Google Scholar

    [48]

    Yang Z J, Lustig E, Harari G, Plotnik Y, Lumer Y, Bandres M A, Segev M 2020 Phys. Rev. X 10 011059

    [49]

    Bai S Y, Bao Q Q, Tian X D, Liu Y M, Wu J H 2018 J. Phys. B 51 075502Google Scholar

    [50]

    Chen T L, Chang S Y, Huang Y J, Shukla K, Huang Y C, Suen T H, Kuan T Y, Shy J T, Liu Y W 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 052507Google Scholar

    [51]

    Tauschinsky A, Newell R, van Linden van den Heuvell H B, Spreeuw R J C 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 042522Google Scholar

    [52]

    Kou J, Wan R G, Kang Z H, Wang H H, Jiang L, Zhang X J, Jiang Y, Gao J Y 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 002035Google Scholar

    [53]

    Ryabtsev I I, Beterov I I, Tretyakov D B, Entin V M, Yakshina E A 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 053409Google Scholar

  • [1] 李观荣, 郑怡婷, 徐琼怡, 裴笑山, 耿玥, 严冬, 杨红. 闭合回路相干增益原子系统中完美非互易反射光放大. 物理学报, 2024, 73(12): 126401. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240347
    [2] 郭阳, 尹默娟, 徐琴芳, 王叶兵, 卢本全, 任洁, 赵芳婧, 常宏. 锶原子光晶格钟自旋极化谱线的探测. 物理学报, 2018, 67(7): 070601. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172759
    [3] 陈文杰, 江俊峰, 刘琨, 王双, 马喆, 张晚琛, 刘铁根. 基于相干光时域反射型的光纤分布式声增敏传感研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(7): 070706. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.070706
    [4] 尹毅, 张奕, 谭伯仲, 陈杰华, 顾思洪. 芯片原子钟相干布居囚禁谱线特性研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(3): 034207. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.034207
    [5] 高峰, 刘辉, 许朋, 王叶兵, 田晓, 常宏. 用于互组跃迁谱测量的窄线宽激光系统. 物理学报, 2014, 63(14): 140704. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.140704
    [6] 赵晨, 陈志彦, 丁志华, 李鹏, 沈毅, 倪秧. 线照明并行谱域光学相干层析成像系统与缺陷检测应用研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(19): 194201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.194201
    [7] 张冰, 刘志学, 徐万超. 四能级双V型原子系统中考虑自发辐射相干的无粒子数反转激光. 物理学报, 2013, 62(16): 164207. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.164207
    [8] 孟冬冬, 刘晓东, 张森林. 倒Y型四能级量子系统中亚光速和超光速传播现象的转换研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(2): 020305. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.020305
    [9] 韩丽丽, 戴振文, 王云鹏, 蒋占魁. 钯原子谱线的分支比测量. 物理学报, 2008, 57(6): 3425-3428. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3425
    [10] 郑 军, 刘正东, 曾福华, 方慧娟. 倒Y形四能级原子系统电磁诱导的左手效应. 物理学报, 2008, 57(7): 4219-4223. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4219
    [11] 赵建明, 汪丽蓉, 赵延霆, 马 杰, 肖连团, 贾锁堂. 外加磁场对简并二能级原子系统相干特性的影响. 物理学报, 2005, 54(11): 5093-5097. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5093
    [12] 张丽英, 刘正东. Y型四能级原子系统对探测场的吸收和色散. 物理学报, 2005, 54(8): 3641-3645. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3641
    [13] 王利强, 李永放, 曹冬梅, 毕冬艳, 张崇俊, 成延春. V型原子系统中相干布居俘获的相干相位调制研究 . 物理学报, 2004, 53(9): 2937-2942. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.2937
    [14] 张向阳, 李永放, 孙建锋, 王永昌. 准Λ型四能级系统中的超窄谱线的研究. 物理学报, 2002, 51(1): 36-41. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.36
    [15] 刘仁红, 谭维翰, 张卫平. 双原子、三原子系统的共振荧光峰值与线宽. 物理学报, 1997, 46(5): 883-891. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.883
    [16] 许晶波, 刘宜昌, 高孝纯. 二次型含时间的谐振子系统的压缩态和压缩相干态. 物理学报, 1995, 44(2): 216-224. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.216
    [17] 姚关华, 徐至展, 屈卫星. 强场自电离中自发辐射谱的功率增宽. 物理学报, 1990, 39(1): 30-34. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.30
    [18] 王永昌, E. JANNITTI, G. TONDELLO. 对等离子体中谱线的斯塔克增宽的真空紫外光谱观测. 物理学报, 1985, 34(8): 1049-1055. doi: 10.7498/aps.34.1049
    [19] 张光寅, 田兆斌. 纤维锌矿型晶体的价带结构与激子谱线的轴向压谱效应. 物理学报, 1965, 21(5): 1008-1014. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.1008
    [20] 陆埮. M?ssbauer谱线的热致宽. 物理学报, 1964, 20(8): 777-784. doi: 10.7498/aps.20.777
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4287
  • PDF下载量:  58
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-03-10
  • 修回日期:  2022-05-17
  • 上网日期:  2022-09-19
  • 刊出日期:  2022-10-05

/

返回文章
返回