搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

拓扑自旋光子晶体中螺旋边界态单向传输调控研究

隋文杰 张玉 张紫瑞 王小龙 张洪方 史强 杨冰

引用本文:
Citation:

拓扑自旋光子晶体中螺旋边界态单向传输调控研究

隋文杰, 张玉, 张紫瑞, 王小龙, 张洪方, 史强, 杨冰

Unidirectional propagation control of helical edge states in topological spin photonic crystals

Sui Wen-Jie, Zhang Yu, Zhang Zi-Rui, Wang Xiao-Long, Zhang Hong-Fang, Shi Qiang, Yang Bing
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 利用二维拓扑自旋光子晶体中的螺旋边界态可以实现赝自旋锁定的光波的单向传输. 尽管已有很多关于拓扑自旋光子晶体的研究, 但对于其螺旋边界态的单向传输调控研究却很少. 本文基于二维C6v对称的拓扑自旋光子晶体结构, 通过调整原胞中介电圆柱直径D以及圆柱与原胞中心的距离R, 详细研究了系统的几何参数对拓扑自旋光子晶体的带隙结构、拓扑性质及其螺旋边界态单向传输性质调控的影响. 结果表明, 参数R对拓扑自旋光子晶体的带隙结构和拓扑性质有显著影响, D的改变会影响自旋光子晶体的带隙位置. 螺旋边界态的结构及其单向传输性质与边界两侧自旋光子晶体带隙的拓扑性质及频带结构密切相关. 在拓扑性质不变的情况下, 改变边界两侧的光子晶体结构, 也会改变螺旋边界态的结构及其单向传输性质. 调整拓扑自旋光子晶体结构的几何参数RD, 就可以实现对螺旋边界态的单向传输性质的调控. 该研究为拓扑自旋光子晶体螺旋边界态的选择和应用提供了参考.
    The unidirectional propagation of the pseudospin-locked optical waves can be achieved by using the helical edge states in two-dimensional topological spin photonic crystals. Although there have been lots of researches on topological spin photonic crystal, the unidirectional propagation regulation of helical edge states has been rarely studied up to now. Herein, by tuning the diameter D of the dielectric rod and the distance R between the center of the unit cell and the center of the rod in two-dimensional topological spin photonic crystal with C6v symmetry, the effects of geometric parameters on the bandgap structure, topological properties and unidirectional propagation of helical edge states in topological spin photonics crystals are studied in detail. The results show that the parameter R has significant effects on the bandgap structure and topological properties of topological spin photonic crystal, and the diameter D of rod only affects the bandgap positions. The structures of helical edge states and their unidirectional propagations are closely related to the topological properties of the bandgaps and the frequency structures of photonic crystals on both sides of boundary. Without changing the topological properties of bandgaps, only changing the structures of the photonics crystals on either side of the boundary can also regulate the structures of the helical edge states and their unidirectional propagation. Thus, by adjusting the geometric parameters R and D of the topological spin photonic crystals, the helical edge states and their unidirectional propagations can be controlled. This study provides useful references for the selection and application of helical edge states in topological spin photonic crytals.
      通信作者: 杨冰, yangbing@lcu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 山东省自然科学基金(批准号: ZR2021MA091)和山东省高校青创人才引育计划项目资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Yang Bing, yangbing@lcu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2021MA091) and the Introduction and Cultivation Plan of Youth Innovation Talents for Universities of Shandong Province.
    [1]

    Lu L, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 821Google Scholar

    [2]

    Hasan M Z, Kane C L 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 3045Google Scholar

    [3]

    吕新宇, 李志强 2019 物理学报 68 220303Google Scholar

    Lv X Y, Li Z Q 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 220303Google Scholar

    [4]

    Wu Y, Li C, Hu X Y, Ao Y T, Zhao Y F, Gong Q H 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1700357

    [5]

    Ozawa T, Price H M, Amo A, Goldman N, Hafezi M, Lu L, Rechtsman M C, Schuster D, Simon J, Zilberberg O, Carusotto L 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 015006Google Scholar

    [6]

    王彦兰, 李妍 2020 物理学报 69 094206Google Scholar

    Wang Y L, Li Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 094206Google Scholar

    [7]

    Haldane F M, Raghu S 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 013904Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang Z, Chong Y D, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 013905Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang Z, Chong Y D, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2009 Nature 461 772Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yin P, Wu R X, Lin Z, Yang Y, Chan C T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 093903Google Scholar

    [11]

    Skirlo S A, Lu L, Soljacic M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 113904Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yang B, Wu T, Zhang X D 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 021109Google Scholar

    [13]

    Chan H C, Guo G Y 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 45422Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yang B, Zhang H F, Shi Q, Wu T, Ma Y, Lv Z T, Xiao X, Dong R X, Yan X L, Zhang X D 2020 Opt. Express 28 31487Google Scholar

    [15]

    陈剑锋, 梁文耀, 李志远 2021 光学学报 41 0823015Google Scholar

    Chen J F, Liang W Y, Li Z Y 2021 Acta Opt. Sin. 41 0823015Google Scholar

    [16]

    Hafezi M, Mittal S, Fan J, Migdall A, Taylor J M 2013 Nat. Photonics 7 1001Google Scholar

    [17]

    Rechtsman M C, Zeuner J M, Plotnik Y, Lumer Y, Podolsky D, Dreisow F, Nolte S, Segev M, Szameit A 2013 Nature 496 196Google Scholar

    [18]

    Mukherjee S, Spracklen A, Valiente M, Andersson E, Öhberg P, Goldman N, Thomson R R 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 13918Google Scholar

    [19]

    Maczewsky L J, Zeuner J M, Nolte S, Szameit A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 13756Google Scholar

    [20]

    Chen W J, Jiang S J, Chen X D, Zhu B, Zhou L, Dong J W 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 5782Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wu L H, Hu X 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 223901Google Scholar

    [22]

    方云团, 王张鑫, 范尔盼, 李小雪, 王洪金 2020 物理学报 69 184101Google Scholar

    Fang Y T, Wang Z X, Fan E P, Li X X, Wang H J 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 184101Google Scholar

    [23]

    Jin M C, Gao Y F, Ma Q L, Zhang W, Song H, Sun J P 2021 Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 024204Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li Z, Chan H C, Xiang Y 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 245149Google Scholar

    [25]

    Xu L, Wang H X, Xu Y D, Chen H Y, Jiang J H 2016 Opt. Express 24 18059Google Scholar

    [26]

    Fang Y T, Wang Z X. 2021 Opt. Commun. 479 126451Google Scholar

    [27]

    Yang Y T, Xu Y F, Xu T, Wang H X, Jiang J H, Hu X, Hang Z H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 217401Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang Y T, Qian X Y, Shi L W, Shen X P, Wang Y F, Hang Z H 2022 Opt. Express 30 5731Google Scholar

    [29]

    Chen X D, Deng W M, Shi F L, Zhao F L, Chen M, Dong J W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 233902Google Scholar

    [30]

    Tang G J, He X T, Shi F L, Liu J W, Chen X D, Dong J W 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2100300Google Scholar

    [31]

    Xu X F, Huang J Y, Zhang H, Guo X Y, Mu S S, Liu Y Q, Zhai N 2021 Opt. Commun. 498 127262Google Scholar

    [32]

    刘慧, 王好南, 谢博阳, 程化, 田建国, 陈树琪 2021 中国光学 14 20Google Scholar

    Liu H, Wang H N, Xie B Y, Cheng H, Tian J G, Chen S Q 2021 Chin. Opt. 14 20Google Scholar

    [33]

    Joannopoulos J D, Johnson S G, Winn J N, Meade R D 2008 Photonic Crystals: Molding The Flow of Light (2nd Ed) (New Jersey: Princeton University Press) pp80–93

    [34]

    Yang B, Zhang H F, Wu T, Dong R X, Yan X L, Zhang X D 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 045307Google Scholar

    [35]

    Jiang Z, Gao Y F, He L, Sun J P, Song H, Wang Q 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 11367Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)二维三角晶格光子晶体原胞; (b)光子晶体周期结构; (c)三角晶格光子晶体的第一布里渊区; (d)—(f)当D = 2a/9时, R分别取a/3 – 0.02a, a/3和a/3 + 0.02a时, 光子晶体的频带结构; (d)和(f)中插图为相应的Г点处p轨道和d轨道的本征模场|Ez|

    Fig. 1.  (a) Primitive cell of two-dimensional triangular lattice; (b) periodic structure of photonic crystal; (c) the first Brillouin zone of the periodic structure; (d)–(f) frequency band structures as D = 2a/9 and R takes values of a/3–0.02a, a/3 and a/3 + 0.02a, respectively; inserts in (d) and (f) show the distributions of eigenfields |Ez| of p and d orbits at point Г

    图 2  (a)赝自旋拓扑性质不同的光子晶体结构界面处的投影边界态, 阴影部分为体态, 红色曲线为螺旋边界态; (b)用于计算投影边界态的超原胞结构示意图; (c)和(d)分别与(a)图中A点和C点边界态对应的本征模场|Ez|及相位分布ϕ = arg(Ez); (e)和(f)分别与(a)图中A点和C点边界态对应的由赝自旋光源激发的光传播模拟图, 其中环形箭头表示赝自旋光源所在的位置, 箭头旋转方向表示光源的自旋方向

    Fig. 2.  (a) Projected diagram of edge state at boundary of two photonic crystals with different pseudospin topological properties, shaded areas are bulk states, and red curves are helical edge states; (b) supercell for calculation of projected diagram; (c) and (d) the eigenfield |Ez| and phase distribution ϕ = arg(Ez) of edge states A and C in (a), respectively; (e) and (f) propagation simulation of edge states A and C excited by pseudospin sources, the yellow circular arrows denote locations of sources, and rotation directions of arrows indicate spin directions of sources.

    图 3  (a) p轨道和d轨道间带隙宽度随RD变化结果; (b) p轨道和d轨道间带隙位置随RD变化结果

    Fig. 3.  (a) Variation of the bandgap width between orbits p and d with parameters R and D; (b) variation of the bandgap position with parameters R and D.

    图 4  (a)模型结构示意图; (b)—(f)当D=0.13a时, 分别取r值为0.01a, 0.02a, 0.04a, 0.06a和0.08a时系统的投影边界态以及赝自旋光波在边界处的单向传输效果图, 左侧图: 投影边界态, 中间图: 光波能量wAwB, 右侧图: 单向隔离率β; (e)中蓝、黑、绿、洋红、红色虚线(由上至下)分别对应上体态带底、上边界态带顶、上边界态带底、下边界态带顶和下体态带顶处的频率位置; (c)中MN两点分别对应频率0.648的下边界态和频率0.684的上边界态; (f)中O点对应频率0.622的下边界态、PQ点对应频率0.685的两上边界态

    Fig. 4.  (a) Schematic diagram of calculation model; (b)–(f) projected diagram of edge states and unidirectional propagation of pseudospin wave at boundaries as D = 0.13a and r takes values of 0.01a, 0.02a, 0.04a, 0.06a and 0.08a, respectively. Left panel: projected diagram, central panel: optical energy wA and wB, right panel: unidirectional isolation rate β. In (e), the blue , black, green, magenta and red dashed lines (top to bottom) represent frequency positions of bottom of upper body state, top of upper edge state, bottom of upper edge state, top of lower edge state and top of lower body state, respectively. In (c), points M and N mark the lower edge state with frequency 0.648 and upper edge state with frequency 0.684, respectively. In (f), point O marks the lower edge state with frequency 0.622, points P and Q mark the upper edge states with frequency 0.685.

    图 5  随着r的增大, C1和C2结构交界面处螺旋边界态的演化

    Fig. 5.  Variation of helical edge states at the boundary of C1 and C2 as r increases.

    图 6  赝自旋光源激发的不同的螺旋边界态在边界处的传输 (a)—(d)分别对应图4(c)M, N点和图4(f)O, P点边界态

    Fig. 6.  Propagation of helical edge state excited by pseudopospin sources at the boundary: (a)–(d) Corresponding to the edge states of points M and N in Fig.4(c), and points O and P in Fig.4(f), respectively.

    图 7  (a)—(c)当R1 = 0.21a, R2 = 0.41a时, D1 = D2 = D, 并分别取D为0.1a, 0.13a, 0.16a时系统的投影边界态图及赝自旋光波在边界处的单向传输效果图, 左侧图: 投影边界态, 中间图: 光波能量wAwB, 右侧图: 单向隔离率β; (d)随着D增大, 螺旋边界态的演化, 图中曲线类型及颜色标记同图5; (e)和(f)赝自旋光源激发的(b)图中EF点处边界态在界面处的传播

    Fig. 7.  (a)–(c) Projected diagram of edge states and unidirectional propagation of pseudospin wave at boundaries as R1 = 0.21a, R2 = 0.41a, D1 = D2 = D and D takes values of 0.1a, 0.13a and 0.16a, respectively. Left panel: projected diagram, central panel: optical energy wA and wB, right panel: unidirectional isolation rate β. (d) Variation of helical edge states as D increases, the curve types and color legends are the same as those in Fig.5. (e) and (f) Propagation simulation of the edge states of points E and F in (b), respectively, exited by pseudospin sources.

    图 8  上行图边界处激发光源附近本征场Ez的相位分布(a)—(d)分别对应图4(c)中M, N点和图4(f)O, P点边界态相位分布;(e)自由空间中赝自旋光源的电场相位分布. 下行各图对应上行各图中白色圆圈路径上的光场的相位变化, 激发光源位于白色圆圈中心

    Fig. 8.  Upper panels: Phase distributions ϕ = arg(Ez) of the eigenfield around excited sources at boundaries, (a)–(d) corresponding to the edge states of points M and N in Fig.4(c), and points O and P in Fig.4(f), respectively; (e) pseudospin source in free space, lower panels: variation of the phase distributions along the white circle in each upper panel, the excited source locates at the center of each white circle.

    图 9  (a)—(c) C1, C2和C3结构光子晶体的频带结构, (c)中插图为其第4个频带Г点处的本征模场|Ez|; (d)和(e) C12结构和C13结构的赝自旋螺旋边界态及其单向传输效果图. 左侧图: 投影边界态, 中间图: 光波能量wAwB, 右侧图: 单向隔离率β. (f)—(i)分别对应C12结构中赝自旋光源激发的(d)图中S点和T点边界态以及C13结构中赝自旋光源激发的(e)图中U点和V点边界态在界面处的传播

    Fig. 9.  (a)–(c) Band structures of the photonic crystals of C1, C2 and C3, respectively, insert in (c) shows the eigenfield |Ez| of Гof the 4th band; (d) and (e) projected diagram of edge states and unidirectional propagation of pseudospin wave at boundaries of C12 and C13 structures, respectively. Left panel: projected diagram, central panel: optical energy wA and wB, right panel: unidirectional isolation rate β. (f)–(i) Propagation simulation of the edge states of points S and T in (d) of C12 structure, and edge states of points U and V in (e) of C13 structure, respectively, exited by pseudospin sources.

  • [1]

    Lu L, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 821Google Scholar

    [2]

    Hasan M Z, Kane C L 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 3045Google Scholar

    [3]

    吕新宇, 李志强 2019 物理学报 68 220303Google Scholar

    Lv X Y, Li Z Q 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 220303Google Scholar

    [4]

    Wu Y, Li C, Hu X Y, Ao Y T, Zhao Y F, Gong Q H 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1700357

    [5]

    Ozawa T, Price H M, Amo A, Goldman N, Hafezi M, Lu L, Rechtsman M C, Schuster D, Simon J, Zilberberg O, Carusotto L 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 015006Google Scholar

    [6]

    王彦兰, 李妍 2020 物理学报 69 094206Google Scholar

    Wang Y L, Li Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 094206Google Scholar

    [7]

    Haldane F M, Raghu S 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 013904Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang Z, Chong Y D, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 013905Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang Z, Chong Y D, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2009 Nature 461 772Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yin P, Wu R X, Lin Z, Yang Y, Chan C T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 093903Google Scholar

    [11]

    Skirlo S A, Lu L, Soljacic M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 113904Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yang B, Wu T, Zhang X D 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 021109Google Scholar

    [13]

    Chan H C, Guo G Y 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 45422Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yang B, Zhang H F, Shi Q, Wu T, Ma Y, Lv Z T, Xiao X, Dong R X, Yan X L, Zhang X D 2020 Opt. Express 28 31487Google Scholar

    [15]

    陈剑锋, 梁文耀, 李志远 2021 光学学报 41 0823015Google Scholar

    Chen J F, Liang W Y, Li Z Y 2021 Acta Opt. Sin. 41 0823015Google Scholar

    [16]

    Hafezi M, Mittal S, Fan J, Migdall A, Taylor J M 2013 Nat. Photonics 7 1001Google Scholar

    [17]

    Rechtsman M C, Zeuner J M, Plotnik Y, Lumer Y, Podolsky D, Dreisow F, Nolte S, Segev M, Szameit A 2013 Nature 496 196Google Scholar

    [18]

    Mukherjee S, Spracklen A, Valiente M, Andersson E, Öhberg P, Goldman N, Thomson R R 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 13918Google Scholar

    [19]

    Maczewsky L J, Zeuner J M, Nolte S, Szameit A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 13756Google Scholar

    [20]

    Chen W J, Jiang S J, Chen X D, Zhu B, Zhou L, Dong J W 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 5782Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wu L H, Hu X 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 223901Google Scholar

    [22]

    方云团, 王张鑫, 范尔盼, 李小雪, 王洪金 2020 物理学报 69 184101Google Scholar

    Fang Y T, Wang Z X, Fan E P, Li X X, Wang H J 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 184101Google Scholar

    [23]

    Jin M C, Gao Y F, Ma Q L, Zhang W, Song H, Sun J P 2021 Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 024204Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li Z, Chan H C, Xiang Y 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 245149Google Scholar

    [25]

    Xu L, Wang H X, Xu Y D, Chen H Y, Jiang J H 2016 Opt. Express 24 18059Google Scholar

    [26]

    Fang Y T, Wang Z X. 2021 Opt. Commun. 479 126451Google Scholar

    [27]

    Yang Y T, Xu Y F, Xu T, Wang H X, Jiang J H, Hu X, Hang Z H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 217401Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang Y T, Qian X Y, Shi L W, Shen X P, Wang Y F, Hang Z H 2022 Opt. Express 30 5731Google Scholar

    [29]

    Chen X D, Deng W M, Shi F L, Zhao F L, Chen M, Dong J W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 233902Google Scholar

    [30]

    Tang G J, He X T, Shi F L, Liu J W, Chen X D, Dong J W 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2100300Google Scholar

    [31]

    Xu X F, Huang J Y, Zhang H, Guo X Y, Mu S S, Liu Y Q, Zhai N 2021 Opt. Commun. 498 127262Google Scholar

    [32]

    刘慧, 王好南, 谢博阳, 程化, 田建国, 陈树琪 2021 中国光学 14 20Google Scholar

    Liu H, Wang H N, Xie B Y, Cheng H, Tian J G, Chen S Q 2021 Chin. Opt. 14 20Google Scholar

    [33]

    Joannopoulos J D, Johnson S G, Winn J N, Meade R D 2008 Photonic Crystals: Molding The Flow of Light (2nd Ed) (New Jersey: Princeton University Press) pp80–93

    [34]

    Yang B, Zhang H F, Wu T, Dong R X, Yan X L, Zhang X D 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 045307Google Scholar

    [35]

    Jiang Z, Gao Y F, He L, Sun J P, Song H, Wang Q 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 11367Google Scholar

  • [1] 杨帅, 唐泽波, 杨驰, 查王妹. 相对论重离子碰撞中光子-光子相互作用的碰撞参数依赖性. 物理学报, 2023, 72(20): 201201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230948
    [2] 刘启沛, 张程贤, 薛正远. 强驱动单态-三重态量子比特的高保真单比特门. 物理学报, 2023, 72(20): 200302. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230906
    [3] 熊霄, 曹启韬, 肖云峰. 铌酸锂集成光子器件的发展与机遇. 物理学报, 2023, 72(23): 234201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231295
    [4] 杨帅, 张浩, 何珂. 选区外延生长的PbTe-超导杂化纳米线: 一个可能实现拓扑量子计算的新体系. 物理学报, 2023, 72(23): 238701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231603
    [5] 宋峰峰, 张广铭. 拓扑激发驱动的热力学相变及其张量网络研究方法. 物理学报, 2023, 72(23): 230301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231152
    [6] 苑涛, 戴汉宁, 陈宇翱. 超冷原子动量光晶格中的非线性拓扑泵浦. 物理学报, 2023, 72(16): 160302. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230740
    [7] 关欣, 陈刚. 双链超导量子电路中的拓扑非平庸节点. 物理学报, 2023, 72(14): 140301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230152
    [8] 王振宇, 李志雄, 袁怀洋, 张知之, 曹云姗, 严鹏. 磁子学中的拓扑物态与量子效应. 物理学报, 2023, 72(5): 057503. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221997
    [9] 邱旭, 王林雪, 陈光平, 胡爱元, 文林. 自旋张量-动量耦合玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚的动力学性质. 物理学报, 2023, 72(18): 180304. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231076
    [10] 郭思嘉, 李昱增, 李天梓, 范喜迎, 邱春印. 二维各向异性SSH模型的拓扑性质研究. 物理学报, 2022, 71(7): 070201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211967
    [11] 卿煜林, 彭小莉, 胡爱元. 自旋为1的双层平方晶格阻挫模型的相变. 物理学报, 2022, 71(4): 047501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211685
    [12] 邵光伟, 于瑞, 傅婷, 陈南梁, 刘向阳. 三氧化钨晶体拓扑结构生长行为及其电致变色性能. 物理学报, 2022, 71(2): 028201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211555
    [13] 李庆回, 姚文秀, 李番, 田龙, 王雅君, 郑耀辉. 明亮压缩态光场的操控及量子层析. 物理学报, 2021, 70(15): 154203. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210318
    [14] 郭文锑, 黄璐, 许桂贵, 钟克华, 张健敏, 黄志高. 本征磁性拓扑绝缘体MnBi2Te4电子结构的压力应变调控. 物理学报, 2021, 70(4): 047101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201237
    [15] 钟东洲, 曾能, 杨华, 徐喆. 外部光注入的光泵浦自旋垂直腔表面发射激光器中的两个混沌偏振分量对两个复杂形状目标中的多区域精确测距. 物理学报, 2021, 70(7): 074206. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201693
    [16] 马奥杰, 陈颂佳, 李玉秀, 陈颖. 纳米颗粒布朗扩散边界条件的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2021, 70(14): 148201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202240
    [17] 危语嫣, 高子凯, 王思颖, 朱雅静, 李涛. 基于单光子双量子态的确定性的安全量子通讯. 物理学报, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210907
    [18] 宋彤彤, 罗杰, 赖耘. 赝局域有效介质理论. 物理学报, 2020, 69(15): 154203. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200196
    [19] 王冲, 邢巧霞, 谢元钢, 晏湖根. 拓扑材料等离激元谱学研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(22): 227801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191098
    [20] 王洪飞, 解碧野, 詹鹏, 卢明辉, 陈延峰. 拓扑光子学研究进展. 物理学报, 2019, 68(22): 224206. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191437
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2545
  • PDF下载量:  109
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-02-28
  • 修回日期:  2022-06-05
  • 上网日期:  2022-09-16
  • 刊出日期:  2022-10-05

/

返回文章
返回