时滞和扩散影响下社交网络谣言传播动力学

王楠; 肖敏; 蒋海军; 黄霞

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220726

摘要

提出了一个考虑空间扩散与发酵期时滞的社交网络谣言传播模型, 重点研究了扩散与时滞对在线社交网络中谣言时空传播的影响. 首先, 分析了谣言传播平衡点的存在性, 并得到了基本再生数$R_{0}$; 其次, 运用Roth-Hurwitz稳定判据分析了谣言传播平衡点的局部稳定性, 并讨论了扩散诱导的Turing不稳定; 最后, 选取时滞为分岔参数, 建立了谣言传播模型的Hopf 分岔条件. 数值仿真结果表明, 扩散和时滞的出现都能使得谣言传播模型的稳定性发生根本性改变. 本文从时间和空间两个维度扩展了传统谣言传播动力学仅考虑时间演化的局限, 更加真实地模拟了谣言在现实社会中的时空传播规律, 为谣言传播的治理提供了全新的角度和思路.

关键词:

Abstract

Rumors in social networks are often referred to as infectious diseases of the Internet, because rumors spreading in networks feature strong concealment, fast transmission speed and wide spread. With the development of mobile devices, online rumors nowadays are far more harmful than before. Rumors in social networks show completely different spatiotemporal dynamics from traditional rumor spreading dynamics. A social network rumor spreading model with considering both reaction diffusion and fermentation time delay is proposed in this paper. The effects of spatial diffusion and time delay on rumor spreading in online social networks are studied. Firstly, the existence of equilibrium point of the reaction-diffusion rumor spreading model is analyzed, and the basic regeneration number $R_{0}$ is calculated. When $R_{0} < 1$, the rumor stops spreading and disappears in social networks; when $R_{0}>1$, the rumor persists in social networks. Secondly, the local stability of the rumor spreading equilibrium is investigated by using the Roth-Hurwitz stability criterion, and the influence of diffusion on the system stability is discussed. When the diffusion is introduced into a stable rumor spreading model without time delay, the model becomes unstable, indicating that the Turing instability is caused by diffusion. Thirdly, the Hopf bifurcation condition of the rumor spreading model is established by selecting the time delay τ as the bifurcation parameter, and the expression of bifurcation threshold $\tau_{0}$ is given. When $\tau < \tau_{0}$, the rumor propagation model with diffusion term is stable; when $\tau>\tau_{0}$, the model loses the stability and the Hopf bifurcation occurs. The numerical simulation results show that both diffusion and time delay play an important role in the dynamic evolution of rumor spreading. At the same time, the influence of the crowding degree of spreaders on rumor propagation is also simulated. As the crowding gets worse and worse, the rumor refuting effect weakens, the bifurcation threshold $\tau_{0}$ decreases, and the propagation peak increases. Therefore, it is important to build an excellent social network environment to supervise the rumors that are still in the fermentation stage, improve the timeliness of the release of rumor refuting information, and strengthen the refuting of rumors among key groups. This paper breaks through the limitation considering only the time evolution, explores the spatiotemporal spreading law of rumor in real society, and provides a new perspective and idea for governing the rumor spreading.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
南京邮电大学自动化学院&人工智能学院, 南京　210023

2.
新疆大学数学与系统科学学院, 乌鲁木齐　830047

3.
山东科技大学电气与自动化工程学院, 青岛　266590

通信作者: 肖敏, candymanxm2003@aliyun.com

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 62073172, U1703262, 61973199)资助的课题

Authors and contacts

1.
College of Automation & College of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China

2.
College of Mathematics and Systems Science, Xinjiang University, Urumchi 830047, China

3.
College of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

Corresponding author: Xiao Min, candymanxm2003@aliyun.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62073172, U1703262, 61973199)

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Liu X, Li T, Xu H, Liu W 2019 Physica A 514 497 Google Scholar
[2]	Hui H, Zhou C, Lu X, Li J 2020 Nonlinear Dyn. 101 11 Google Scholar
[3]	王祁月, 刘润然, 贾春晓 2021 物理学报 70 068902 Google Scholar Wang Q Y, Liu R R, Jia C X 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 068902 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhou D, Han W, Wang Y 2015 J. Comput. Res. Dev. 52 156 Google Scholar
[5]	Youssef B, Gregory Z, Judicael R, Bruno V 2019 Simulation 95 411 Google Scholar
[6]	李瑾颉, 吴联仁, 齐佳音, 闫强 2017 电子与信息学报 39 785 Google Scholar Li J J, Wu L R, Qi J Y, Yan Q 2017 J. Electron. Inf. Technol. 39 785 Google Scholar
[7]	Junior V V, Rodriguez P M, Speroto A 2021 J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 12 123403 Google Scholar
[8]	张菊平, 郭昊明, 荆文君, 靳祯 2019 物理学报 68 150501 Google Scholar Zhang J P, Guo H M, Jing W J, Jin Z 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 150501 Google Scholar
[9]	Zhu L, Wang B 2020 Inf. Sci. 526 1 Google Scholar
[10]	Jia P, Wang C, Zhang G, Ma J 2019 Physica A 524 342 Google Scholar
[11]	Huo L, Chen S, Zhao L 2021 Physica A 571 125828 Google Scholar
[12]	Zanette D H 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 050901 Google Scholar
[13]	Moreno Y, Pacheco A F, Nekovee M 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 066130 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhou J, Liu Z H, Li B M 2007 Phys. Lett. A 368 458 Google Scholar
[15]	张芳, 司光亚, 罗批 2009 复杂系统与复杂性科学 6 1 Google Scholar Zhang F, Si G Y, Luo P 2009 Complex Systems and Complexity Science 6 1 Google Scholar
[16]	Zhao L J, Wang Q, Cheng J J, Chen Y C, Wang J J, Huang W 2011 Physica A 390 2619 Google Scholar
[17]	顾亦然, 夏玲玲 2012 物理学报 61 238701 Google Scholar Gu Y R, Xia L L 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 238701 Google Scholar
[18]	万佑红, 王小初 2016 计算机应用 36 2381 Google Scholar Wan Y H, Wang X C 2016 Journal of Computer Applications 36 2381 Google Scholar
[19]	朱霖河, 李玲 2020 物理学报 69 020501 Google Scholar Zhu L H, Li L 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 020501 Google Scholar
[20]	Ruan Z Y, Yu B, Shu X C, Zhang Q P, Xuan Q 2020 Chaos 30 083101 Google Scholar
[21]	Chen X L, Wang N 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1 Google Scholar
[22]	Ahmed N, Korkamaz A, Rehman M A, Rafiq M, Ali M, Ahmad M O 2020 Int. J. Comput. Math. 98 517 Google Scholar
[23]	Hattaf K, Yousfi N 2016 Comput. Math. Appl. 72 2741 Google Scholar
[24]	赵洪涌, 朱霖河 2015 南京航空航天大学学报 47 332 Google Scholar Zhao H Y, Zhu L H 2015 Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics 47 332 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhu L, Huang X, Liu Y, Zhang Z 2021 J. Math. Anal. Appl. 493 124539 Google Scholar
[26]	Tan W, Yu W W, Hayat T, Alsaadi F, Fardoun H M 2018 Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 28 1830029 Google Scholar
[27]	Peter F P, John F, Jakob H 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 022302 Google Scholar
[28]	Van D D, Watmough J 2002 Math. Biosci. 180 29 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 当$\tau = 0, \;d_{1}=d_{2}=d_{3} = 0$ 时, 模型(2)在$ E^{\ast} $处是局部渐近稳定的

Fig. 1. Model (2) is locally asymptotically stable at $ E^{\ast} $ when $ \tau = 0, d_{1}=d_{2}=d_{3} = 0 $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 当$\tau = 0,\; d_{1} = 6,\; d_{2} = 0.01, \;d_{3} = 0.01$ 时, 模型(2)在$ E^{\ast} $处是不稳定的

Fig. 2. Model (2) is unstable at $ E^{\ast} $ when $\tau = 0,\; d_{1} = 6,\; d_{2} = 0.01, \;d_{3} = 0.01$

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 Turing不稳定发生时模型(2)的Turing斑图

Fig. 3. Turing patterns of model (2) when Turing instability occurs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 当$ \tau = 2.6 < \tau_{0} = 2.6332 $时模型(2) 的波形图

Fig. 4. Waveform plots of model (2) with $ \tau = 2.6 < \tau_{0} = 2.6332 $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 当$ \tau = 2.655 > \tau_{0} = 2.6332 $时模型(2)的波形图

Fig. 5. Waveform plots of model (2) with $ \tau = 2.655 > \tau_{0} = 2.6332 $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 模型(2)在位置x = 4处的相图 (a) $ \tau = 2.6 $; (b) $ \tau = 2.655 $

Fig. 6. Phase diagram of model (2) at x = 4: (a) $ \tau = 2.6 $; (b) $ \tau = 2.655 $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 不同α取值时I的波形图

Fig. 7. Waveform of I with different values of α

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同α对应的平衡点与分岔阈值

Table 1. Equilibrium point and bifurcation threshold for different α

饱和因子α	平衡点$(S^{\ast}, I^{\ast}, R^{\ast})$	分岔阈值$\tau_{0}$
0.1	(1.1615, 0.6479, 0.8572)	2.8331
0.3	(1.1074, 0.7040, 0.8552)	2.7589
0.5	(1.0596, 0.7584, 0.8487)	2.7048
0.7	(1.0182, 0.8094, 0.8390)	2.6436
0.9	(0.9833, 0.8560, 0.8274)	2.5143

下载: 导出CSV

[1]	Liu X, Li T, Xu H, Liu W 2019 Physica A 514 497 Google Scholar
[2]	Hui H, Zhou C, Lu X, Li J 2020 Nonlinear Dyn. 101 11 Google Scholar
[3]	王祁月, 刘润然, 贾春晓 2021 物理学报 70 068902 Google Scholar Wang Q Y, Liu R R, Jia C X 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 068902 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhou D, Han W, Wang Y 2015 J. Comput. Res. Dev. 52 156 Google Scholar
[5]	Youssef B, Gregory Z, Judicael R, Bruno V 2019 Simulation 95 411 Google Scholar
[6]	李瑾颉, 吴联仁, 齐佳音, 闫强 2017 电子与信息学报 39 785 Google Scholar Li J J, Wu L R, Qi J Y, Yan Q 2017 J. Electron. Inf. Technol. 39 785 Google Scholar
[7]	Junior V V, Rodriguez P M, Speroto A 2021 J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 12 123403 Google Scholar
[8]	张菊平, 郭昊明, 荆文君, 靳祯 2019 物理学报 68 150501 Google Scholar Zhang J P, Guo H M, Jing W J, Jin Z 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 150501 Google Scholar
[9]	Zhu L, Wang B 2020 Inf. Sci. 526 1 Google Scholar
[10]	Jia P, Wang C, Zhang G, Ma J 2019 Physica A 524 342 Google Scholar
[11]	Huo L, Chen S, Zhao L 2021 Physica A 571 125828 Google Scholar
[12]	Zanette D H 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 050901 Google Scholar
[13]	Moreno Y, Pacheco A F, Nekovee M 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 066130 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhou J, Liu Z H, Li B M 2007 Phys. Lett. A 368 458 Google Scholar
[15]	张芳, 司光亚, 罗批 2009 复杂系统与复杂性科学 6 1 Google Scholar Zhang F, Si G Y, Luo P 2009 Complex Systems and Complexity Science 6 1 Google Scholar
[16]	Zhao L J, Wang Q, Cheng J J, Chen Y C, Wang J J, Huang W 2011 Physica A 390 2619 Google Scholar
[17]	顾亦然, 夏玲玲 2012 物理学报 61 238701 Google Scholar Gu Y R, Xia L L 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 238701 Google Scholar
[18]	万佑红, 王小初 2016 计算机应用 36 2381 Google Scholar Wan Y H, Wang X C 2016 Journal of Computer Applications 36 2381 Google Scholar
[19]	朱霖河, 李玲 2020 物理学报 69 020501 Google Scholar Zhu L H, Li L 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 020501 Google Scholar
[20]	Ruan Z Y, Yu B, Shu X C, Zhang Q P, Xuan Q 2020 Chaos 30 083101 Google Scholar
[21]	Chen X L, Wang N 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1 Google Scholar
[22]	Ahmed N, Korkamaz A, Rehman M A, Rafiq M, Ali M, Ahmad M O 2020 Int. J. Comput. Math. 98 517 Google Scholar
[23]	Hattaf K, Yousfi N 2016 Comput. Math. Appl. 72 2741 Google Scholar
[24]	赵洪涌, 朱霖河 2015 南京航空航天大学学报 47 332 Google Scholar Zhao H Y, Zhu L H 2015 Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics 47 332 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhu L, Huang X, Liu Y, Zhang Z 2021 J. Math. Anal. Appl. 493 124539 Google Scholar
[26]	Tan W, Yu W W, Hayat T, Alsaadi F, Fardoun H M 2018 Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 28 1830029 Google Scholar
[27]	Peter F P, John F, Jakob H 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 022302 Google Scholar
[28]	Van D D, Watmough J 2002 Math. Biosci. 180 29 Google Scholar

[1]	陆源杉, 肖敏, 万佑红, 丁洁, 蒋海军. 交叉扩散驱动的SI模型空间斑图. 物理学报, 2024, 73(8): 080201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231877
[2]	王祁月, 刘润然, 贾春晓. 复杂网络上的意见动力学对谣言传播的影响. 物理学报, 2021, 70(6): 068902. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201486
[3]	朱霖河, 李玲. 基于辟谣机制的时滞谣言传播模型的动力学分析. 物理学报, 2020, 69(2): 020501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191503
[4]	张菊平, 郭昊明, 荆文君, 靳祯. 基于真实信息传播者的谣言传播模型的动力学分析. 物理学报, 2019, 68(15): 150501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190191
[5]	陆金波, 侯晓荣, 罗敏. 一类Hopf分岔系统的通用鲁棒稳定控制器设计方法. 物理学报, 2016, 65(6): 060502. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.060502
[6]	万贻平, 张东戈, 任清辉. 考虑谣言清除过程的网络谣言传播与抑制. 物理学报, 2015, 64(24): 240501. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.240501
[7]	张玲梅, 张建文, 吴润衡. 具有对应分段系统和指数系统的新混沌系统的Hopf分岔控制研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(16): 160505. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.160505
[8]	朱霖河, 赵洪涌. 时滞惯性神经网络的稳定性和分岔控制. 物理学报, 2014, 63(9): 090203. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.090203
[9]	王辉, 韩江洪, 邓林, 程克勤. 基于移动社交网络的谣言传播动力学研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(11): 110505. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.110505
[10]	崔岩, 刘素华, 葛晓陵. Langford系统Hopf分岔极限环幅值控制. 物理学报, 2012, 61(10): 100202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.100202
[11]	石兰芳, 欧阳成, 陈丽华, 莫嘉琪. 一类大气等离子体反应扩散模型的解法. 物理学报, 2012, 61(5): 050203. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.050203
[12]	顾亦然, 夏玲玲. 在线社交网络中谣言的传播与抑制. 物理学报, 2012, 61(23): 238701. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.238701
[13]	吴志强, 孙立明. 基于Washout滤波器的Rössler系统Hopf分岔控制. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 050504. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.050504
[14]	马伟, 王明渝, 聂海龙. 单周期控制Boost变换器Hopf分岔控制及电路实现. 物理学报, 2011, 60(10): 100202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.100202
[15]	张立森, 蔡理, 冯朝文. 线性延时反馈Josephson结的Hopf分岔和混沌化. 物理学报, 2011, 60(6): 060306. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.060306
[16]	刘爽, 刘浩然, 闻岩, 刘彬. 一类耦合非线性相对转动系统的Hopf分岔控制. 物理学报, 2010, 59(8): 5223-5228. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5223
[17]	刘爽, 刘彬, 张业宽, 闻岩. 一类时滞非线性相对转动系统的Hopf分岔与周期解的稳定性. 物理学报, 2010, 59(1): 38-43. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.38
[18]	刘爽, 刘彬, 时培明. 一类相对转动系统Hopf分岔的非线性反馈控制. 物理学报, 2009, 58(7): 4383-4389. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.4383
[19]	刘素华, 唐驾时. 四维Qi系统零平衡点的Hopf分岔反控制. 物理学报, 2008, 57(10): 6162-6168. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6162
[20]	王作雷. 一类简化Lang-Kobayashi方程的Hopf分岔及其稳定性. 物理学报, 2008, 57(8): 4771-4776. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4771

计量

文章访问数: 4949
PDF下载量: 128
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板