-
耳蜗是人体重要的感音器官, 蜗管中的基底膜是所有微观组织的支撑结构, 其与淋巴液之间复杂的耦合运动是耳蜗感音功能产生的首要条件. 通过将耳蜗的长度划分为有限数量的元素, 并给定径向分布, 推导出一组控制方程, 用于微力学和流体耦合. 然后结合矩阵组合方程, 得到基底膜和淋巴液完全耦合的响应. 分析不同激励下基底膜的瞬时响应、不同频率激励时共振位置的时域响应以及基底膜质量及刚度变化对其生物力学行为影响和听力功能的作用. 结果发现: 基底膜质量及刚度的增大均导致最大响应减弱, 但最大响应位置却向基底膜不同方向移动, 前者向底部而后者向顶部向移动; 变化的基底膜截面可以很快地降低耳蜗中部和顶部的特征频率, 以达到较好的滤波和放大特定频率激励的效果, 且可以让耳蜗对特定频率区(1000—3000 Hz)间有较高的分辨效果.The ear is an important sensory organ of the human body. Cochlea has a pivotal role in the hearing system of human. Nearly 300 million people around the world suffer from sensorineural deafness caused by cochlear lesions. Because the mechanism of cochlear sensing is very complex, it has not been understood completely so far, which has become one of the important problems in medicine today. The basilar membrane in the cochlear canal is the supporting structure of all microstructures, the complex coupling motion between basilar membrane and lymph in cochlear canal is the primary condition for generating the cochlear sound sensing function. Therefore, it is essential to study the dynamic behavior of the basement membranes. By dividing the length of the cochlea into a finite number of elements and giving the radial distribution, a set of governing equations is derived for coupling micromechanics with fluid. Then combining these equations with the matrix combination equation, the complete coupling response of basilar membrane and lymph is obtained. The instantaneous responses of the basilar membrane under different excitations, the time domain responses of the resonance position under different frequency excitations, and the effects of the changes of the mass and stiffness of the basilar membrane on its biomechanical properties and hearing function are analyzed. The results showthat the increase of the mass and stiffness of the basilar membrane leads to the weakening of the maximum response, and the increase of the mass causes the maximum response position to move to the bottom of the basilar membrane; the increase of the basilar membrane stiffness causes the maximum response position to move to the top of the basilar membrane; the changing basilar membrane cross-section can rapidly reduce the characteristic frequencies at the middle and top of the cochlea, thus achieving better filtering and amplification of specific frequency excitation, and enabling the cochlea to have a higher resolution in a specific frequency range of 1000–3000 Hz.This computational mathematics model can provide a numerical analysis platform for implementing the clinical evaluation of lesions in the basilar membrane of the inner ear. Compared with the existing finite element models, this method has faster calculation speed and higher efficiency of parameter analysis.
[1] Chadha S, Kamenov K, Cieza A 2021 Bull. W. H. O. 99 242Google Scholar
[2] Taylor R R, Forge A 2005 Science 307 1056Google Scholar
[3] Reichenbach T, Hudspeth A J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 118102Google Scholar
[4] Ashmore J 2008 Physiol. Rev. 88 173Google Scholar
[5] Békésy V G 1960 Q. J. Exp. Physiol. Cogn. Med. Sci. 45 324Google Scholar
[6] Johnstone B M, Patuzzi R, Yates G K 1986 Hear. Res. 22 147Google Scholar
[7] Robles L, Ruggero M A, Rich N C 1991 Nature 349 413Google Scholar
[8] Evans E, Wilson J 1975 Science 190 1218Google Scholar
[9] Narayan S S, Temchin A N, Recio A, Ruggero, M A 1999 Science 282 1882Google Scholar
[10] Gundersen T, Skarstein O, Sikkeland T 1978 Acta Oto-Laryngol. 86 225Google Scholar
[11] Greenwood D D 1990 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 2592Google Scholar
[12] Warren R L, Ramamoorthy S, Ciganovic N, Zhang Y, Wilson T M, Petrie T, Wang R K K, Jacques S L, Reichenbach T, Nuttall A, Fridberger A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 4304Google Scholar
[13] 塔娜, 张景, 许立富, 周雷, 黄新生, 饶柱石 2018 振动与冲击 37 160Google Scholar
Ta N, Zhang J, Xu L F, Zhou L, Huang X S, Rao Z S 2018 J. Vibr. Shock 37 160Google Scholar
[14] Mammano F, Nobili R 1993 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93 3320Google Scholar
[15] Kolston P J 1999 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 3676Google Scholar
[16] Ruggero M A, Narayan S S, Temchin A N, Recio A 2000 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 11744Google Scholar
[17] Duke T, Julicher F 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 158101Google Scholar
[18] Zhang J, Zou D L, Tian J B, Ta N, Rao Z S 2019 Appl. Acoust. 145 278Google Scholar
[19] Gan R Z, Reeves B P, Wang X 2007 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35 2180Google Scholar
[20] Zhang X, Gan R Z 2011 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58 3024Google Scholar
[21] Brown M A, Ji X D, Gan R Z 2021 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 49 757Google Scholar
[22] Zhou K, Liu H G, Yang J H, Zhao Y, Rao Z S, Yang S G 2019 Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 21 3
[23] 周凯, 刘后广, 饶柱石, 杨善国, 赵禹, 徐丹 2017 医用生物力学 32 369Google Scholar
Zhou K, Liu H G, Rao Z S, Yang S G, Zhao Y, Xu D 2017 J. Med. Biomech. 32 369Google Scholar
[24] Liu H G, Xue L, Yang J H, Liu W, Yang S G, Wang W B 2020 Appl. Acoust. 169 107473Google Scholar
[25] Yao W J, Ma J W, Luo X M, Luo B T 2014 J. Mech. Med. Biol. 14 1450051Google Scholar
[26] Yao W J, Zhong J C, Duan M L 2018 Acta Oto-Laryngol. 138 961Google Scholar
[27] Yao W J, Chen Y Q 2017 J. Appl. Math. Mech. 38 997Google Scholar
[28] Ma J W, Yao W J, Hu B L 2020 J. Biomech. Eng. 142 91005Google Scholar
[29] Yao W J, Liang J Y, Ren L J, Ma J W, Zhao Z S, Wang J K, Xie Y Z, Dai P D, Zhang T Y 2021 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 104 106043Google Scholar
[30] Boer E D 1996 Mechanics of the Cochlea: Modeling Efforts (New York: Springer) p258
-
-
[1] Chadha S, Kamenov K, Cieza A 2021 Bull. W. H. O. 99 242Google Scholar
[2] Taylor R R, Forge A 2005 Science 307 1056Google Scholar
[3] Reichenbach T, Hudspeth A J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 118102Google Scholar
[4] Ashmore J 2008 Physiol. Rev. 88 173Google Scholar
[5] Békésy V G 1960 Q. J. Exp. Physiol. Cogn. Med. Sci. 45 324Google Scholar
[6] Johnstone B M, Patuzzi R, Yates G K 1986 Hear. Res. 22 147Google Scholar
[7] Robles L, Ruggero M A, Rich N C 1991 Nature 349 413Google Scholar
[8] Evans E, Wilson J 1975 Science 190 1218Google Scholar
[9] Narayan S S, Temchin A N, Recio A, Ruggero, M A 1999 Science 282 1882Google Scholar
[10] Gundersen T, Skarstein O, Sikkeland T 1978 Acta Oto-Laryngol. 86 225Google Scholar
[11] Greenwood D D 1990 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 2592Google Scholar
[12] Warren R L, Ramamoorthy S, Ciganovic N, Zhang Y, Wilson T M, Petrie T, Wang R K K, Jacques S L, Reichenbach T, Nuttall A, Fridberger A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 4304Google Scholar
[13] 塔娜, 张景, 许立富, 周雷, 黄新生, 饶柱石 2018 振动与冲击 37 160Google Scholar
Ta N, Zhang J, Xu L F, Zhou L, Huang X S, Rao Z S 2018 J. Vibr. Shock 37 160Google Scholar
[14] Mammano F, Nobili R 1993 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93 3320Google Scholar
[15] Kolston P J 1999 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 3676Google Scholar
[16] Ruggero M A, Narayan S S, Temchin A N, Recio A 2000 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 11744Google Scholar
[17] Duke T, Julicher F 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 158101Google Scholar
[18] Zhang J, Zou D L, Tian J B, Ta N, Rao Z S 2019 Appl. Acoust. 145 278Google Scholar
[19] Gan R Z, Reeves B P, Wang X 2007 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35 2180Google Scholar
[20] Zhang X, Gan R Z 2011 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58 3024Google Scholar
[21] Brown M A, Ji X D, Gan R Z 2021 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 49 757Google Scholar
[22] Zhou K, Liu H G, Yang J H, Zhao Y, Rao Z S, Yang S G 2019 Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 21 3
[23] 周凯, 刘后广, 饶柱石, 杨善国, 赵禹, 徐丹 2017 医用生物力学 32 369Google Scholar
Zhou K, Liu H G, Rao Z S, Yang S G, Zhao Y, Xu D 2017 J. Med. Biomech. 32 369Google Scholar
[24] Liu H G, Xue L, Yang J H, Liu W, Yang S G, Wang W B 2020 Appl. Acoust. 169 107473Google Scholar
[25] Yao W J, Ma J W, Luo X M, Luo B T 2014 J. Mech. Med. Biol. 14 1450051Google Scholar
[26] Yao W J, Zhong J C, Duan M L 2018 Acta Oto-Laryngol. 138 961Google Scholar
[27] Yao W J, Chen Y Q 2017 J. Appl. Math. Mech. 38 997Google Scholar
[28] Ma J W, Yao W J, Hu B L 2020 J. Biomech. Eng. 142 91005Google Scholar
[29] Yao W J, Liang J Y, Ren L J, Ma J W, Zhao Z S, Wang J K, Xie Y Z, Dai P D, Zhang T Y 2021 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 104 106043Google Scholar
[30] Boer E D 1996 Mechanics of the Cochlea: Modeling Efforts (New York: Springer) p258
计量
- 文章访问数: 3569
- PDF下载量: 79
- 被引次数: 0