搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

混合沉积有机分子区域选择性生长的动力学蒙特卡罗模拟研究

汪长超 聂青苗 石亮 陈乃波 胡来归 鄢波

引用本文:
Citation:

混合沉积有机分子区域选择性生长的动力学蒙特卡罗模拟研究

汪长超, 聂青苗, 石亮, 陈乃波, 胡来归, 鄢波

Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of selective area growth of mix deposited organic molecules

Wang Chang-Chao, Nie Qing-Miao, Shi Liang, Chen Nai-Bo, Hu Lai-Gui, Yan Bo
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 由区域选择性生长方法(即分子在预图案表面的自组装技术)制备的有机微纳米图案有望在光电和全彩显示方面发挥巨大作用. 而制备多色图案薄膜的有机器件依赖于两种及多种有机分子的成核分配, 特别是混合沉积方法的应用有效提高了多色薄膜成核的效率. 本文利用动力学蒙特卡罗方法研究了两种分子间的结合能强弱对混合沉积两种分子以实现相分离式生长的影响. 结果表明: 当分子间结合能较弱时, 两种分子表现出完全不同的相分离生长行为, 绝大部分的非平面和平面分子分别沉积在电极顶部和侧面; 当分子间结合能较强时, 电极顶部及侧面都出现了两类分子的掺杂生长, 导致了分子相分离生长的失效. 研究证明了分子间的结合能会影响多种有机分子选区生长分离的效果, 因此混合沉积两种有机分子时, 通过适当调整分子间的结合能, 在电极顶部和侧面可分别获得较纯结晶的单色薄膜, 从而促进了多色有机微纳米图案在微显示等领域的进一步应用.
    The selective area growth approach (namely the self-assembly of molecules on pre-patterned surfaces) that takes into account the properties of organic molecular materials and traditional lithography techniques, is expected to play a significant role in manufacturing organic micro-nano patterns for photoelectric and full-color display. The manufacture of organic devices with tunable multicolor patterned films depends on the control of nucleation distribution of two or more organic molecules by using a selective area growth approach, particularly through the application of mixed deposition growth that can enhance the nucleation efficiency of multicolor thin films. However, till now the issue of mixed deposition growth of two kinds of organic molecules has been rarely reported, owing to the complexity in experimental operation. In this work, the selective area growth of mixed deposition of two kinds of molecules is studied by molecular kinetic Monte Carlo approach in order to find the experimental conditions for separating two kinds of molecular growth. In the simulation, the interaction energy between the two molecules is adjusted and controlled to study its influence on the separately selective area growth of the two molecules. The results show that when the intermolecular interaction energy is weak, the planar molecules and the non-planar molecules exhibit completely different growth behaviors. The most of non-planar molecules gather at the top of the electrode in an island mode, while planar molecules mainly accumulate in a layer-by-layer mode on the sides of the electrode. On the contrary, when the intermolecular interaction energy is strong, the number of non-planar particles on the tops decreases and a large number of planar particles appear. Moreover, on the sides of the electrode, the doping nucleation of planar molecules and non-planar molecules also exists, resulting in the failure of molecular phase separation growth. It proves that the intermolecular interaction energy can affect separately area-selective growth of various organic molecules. Therefore, when several different kinds of molecules are mixed and deposited, relatively pure crystalline monochromatic films can be obtained at the top and on the sides of the electrode, respectively, by appropriately adjusting the intermolecular interaction energy, which can further facilitate the application of multi-color organic micro-nano pattern in display and other fields.
      通信作者: 聂青苗, nieqingmiao@zjut.edu.cn ; 鄢波, boyan@zjut.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 62074040)和浙江省自然科学基金(批准号: LZ24D050002)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Nie Qing-Miao, nieqingmiao@zjut.edu.cn ; Yan Bo, boyan@zjut.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62074040) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (Grant No. LZ24D050002).
    [1]

    Shaw J M, Seidler P F 2001 IBM J. Res. Dev. 45 3Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kippelen B, Brédas J L 2009 Energy Enviro. Sci. 2 251Google Scholar

    [3]

    Baek S, Kim K, Sung Y, Jung P, Ju S, Kim W, Kim S J, Hong S H, Lee H 2020 Nanotechnology 31 125301Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tian P F, Bulovic V, Burrows P E, Gu G, Forrest S R, Zhou T X 1999 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17 2975Google Scholar

    [5]

    Saba M H, Mukherjee S, Dutta S, Mallisetty P K, Murmu N C 2021 Mater. Today: Proc. 46 1749Google Scholar

    [6]

    Spiegel I A, Sammons P, Barton K 2020 IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 28 2322Google Scholar

    [7]

    Wang W C, Chi L F 2012 Acc. Chem. Res. 45 1646Google Scholar

    [8]

    Bardotti L, Prevel B, Jensen P, Treilleux M, Mélinon P, Perez A, Mailly D 2002 Appl. Surf. Sci. 191 205Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang W C, Zhong D Y, Zhu J, Kalischewski F, Dou R F, Wedeking K, Chi L F 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 225504Google Scholar

    [10]

    Speth R L, Lauga E 2009 New J. Phys. 11 075024Google Scholar

    [11]

    Hopp S F, Heuer A 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 133 204101Google Scholar

    [12]

    Lied F, Mues T, Wang W C, Chi L F, Heuer A 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 136 024704Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhang H, Liu G, Wang W C, Chi L F, Yuan S L 2014 RSC Adv. 4 25005Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kotelyanskii M, Theodorou D N 2004 Simulation Methods for Polymers (Boca Raton: CRC Press

    [15]

    Neurock M, Hansen E W 1998 Comput. Chem. Eng. 22 S1045Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu G, Zhang H, Liu G K, Yuan S L 2016 Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 494 186Google Scholar

    [17]

    Liu G, Zhang H, Liu G K, Yuan S L, Zhu Q Z 2016 Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 509 401Google Scholar

    [18]

    Blel S, Hamouda A B H 2019 Results Phys. 12 1475Google Scholar

    [19]

    Jiang Y, Shi L, Chen N B, Hu L G, Wang W C, Nie Q M, Yan B 2023 Results Phys. 44 106145Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wang W C, Du C, Zhong D Y, Hirtz M, Wang Y, Lu N, Wu L X, Ebeling D, Li L Q, Fuchs H, Chi L F 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 4721Google Scholar

    [21]

    Kalischewski F, Heuer A 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 155421Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kalischewski F, Zhu J, Heuer A 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 155401Google Scholar

    [23]

    Klawtanong M, Srinitiwarawong C, Chatraphorn P 2018 Thin Solid Films 645 431Google Scholar

    [24]

    Huitema H E A, van der Eerden J P 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 3267Google Scholar

    [25]

    Larsson M I 2001 Phys. Rev. B 64 115428Google Scholar

    [26]

    Michely T, Krug J 2004 Islands, Mounds and Atoms (Vol. 42) (Berlin: Springer

    [27]

    Liu G, Zhang H, Wang W, Yuan S L 2015 Chem. Phys. Lett. 628 54Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)模拟系统结构图, 其中大的灰色和小的黄色方块分别代表二氧化硅基底和金电极, 沉积的非平面(平面)粒子用蓝色(红色)的球表示, 衬底的尺寸为80a×80a×2a, 方形电极(20a×20a×4a)以40a的周期布置在基板上, a是晶格常数, 设为1; (b)平面分子的各向异性分子间相互作用的示意图

    Fig. 1.  (a) Set-up of the simulation system. The large gray and small yellow squares represent the SiO2 substrate and the gold electrode, respectively. The deposited non-planar (planar) particles are represented by blue (red) balls. The size of the substrate is 80a×80a×2a. Square electrodes (20a×20a×4a) are arranged on the substrate with a 40a period. Here a is the lattice constant and set to 1. (b) Schematic diagram of anisotropic intermolecular interactions of planar molecules.

    图 2  当非平面分子(蓝色)和平面分子(红色)垂直面间(沿着面内方向)结合能为0.4kBT (0.2kBT )时, 预图案表面沉积粒子形貌的截面快照随粒子数的演化 (a) 5000; (b) 15000; (c) 30000; (d) 50000

    Fig. 2.  Evolution of the section snapshots of the morphology after (a) 5000, (b) 15000, (c) 30000 and (d) 50000 particles deposited on the surface of the pre-pattern. Here the out-plane (in-plane) interaction energy between the molecules of non-planar (blue) and planar (red) is 0.4kBT (0.2kBT ).

    图 3  当非平面分子和平面分子垂直面间(沿着面内方向)结合能为0.4kBT (0.2kBT )时 (a)非平面分子(平面分子)在电极顶部、侧面的沉积粒子数随入射总粒子数的变化; (b)沉积在电极顶部(侧面)非平面分子(平面分子)的粒子数占顶部(侧面)总粒子数的比率随入射总粒子数的变化

    Fig. 3.  (a) Variation of the number of deposited non-planar (planar) particles on (at) the tops (sides) of the electrodes with the number of incident particles; (b) the variation of the ratio of the number of deposited non-planar (planar) particles on (at) the tops (sides) of the electrodes to the total number of particles with the number of incident particles. Here the out-plane (in-plane) interaction energy between the molecules of non-planar and planar is 0.4kBT (0.2kBT ).

    图 4  当非平面分子(蓝色)和平面分子(红色)垂直面间(沿着面内方向)结合能分别为(a) 0.4$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(0.2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), (b) 1.2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(0.8$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), (c) 2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(1.4$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $)以及(d) 2.8$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $)时, 预图案表面沉积50000个粒子(非平面分子和平面分子各25000个)的最终形貌的截面快照

    Fig. 4.  Section snapshots of the final morphology after 50000 particles deposited on the pre-patterned surface (25000 each for the molecule of non-planar and planar) by varying the out-plane (in-plane) interaction energies between the molecules of non-planar (blue) and planar (red) from (a) 0.4$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(0.2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), (b) 1.2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(0.8$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), (c) 2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(1.4$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $) to (d) 2.8$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $).

    图 5  当非平面分子和平面分子垂直面间(沿着面内方向)结合能分别为0.4$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(0.2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), 1.2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(0.8$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), 2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(1.4$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $)以及2.8$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $)时, (a)非平面分子在电极顶部、侧面的沉积粒子数随入射粒子总数的变化; (b)沉积在电极顶部(侧面)非平面分子(平面分子)的粒子数占顶部(侧面)总粒子数的比率随入射总粒子数的变化

    Fig. 5.  (a) Variation of the number of deposited particles of non-planar on (at) the tops (sides) of the electrodes with the number of incident particles; (b) the variation of the ratio of the number of deposited particles of non-planar (planar) on (at) the tops (sides) of the electrodes to the total number of particles with the number of incident particles. Here the out-plane (in-plane) interaction energy between the molecules of non-planar and planar is 0.4$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(0.2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), 1.2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(0.8$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), 2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(1.4$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $) and 2.8$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $(2$ {k}_{{\mathrm{B}}}T $), respectively.

  • [1]

    Shaw J M, Seidler P F 2001 IBM J. Res. Dev. 45 3Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kippelen B, Brédas J L 2009 Energy Enviro. Sci. 2 251Google Scholar

    [3]

    Baek S, Kim K, Sung Y, Jung P, Ju S, Kim W, Kim S J, Hong S H, Lee H 2020 Nanotechnology 31 125301Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tian P F, Bulovic V, Burrows P E, Gu G, Forrest S R, Zhou T X 1999 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17 2975Google Scholar

    [5]

    Saba M H, Mukherjee S, Dutta S, Mallisetty P K, Murmu N C 2021 Mater. Today: Proc. 46 1749Google Scholar

    [6]

    Spiegel I A, Sammons P, Barton K 2020 IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 28 2322Google Scholar

    [7]

    Wang W C, Chi L F 2012 Acc. Chem. Res. 45 1646Google Scholar

    [8]

    Bardotti L, Prevel B, Jensen P, Treilleux M, Mélinon P, Perez A, Mailly D 2002 Appl. Surf. Sci. 191 205Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang W C, Zhong D Y, Zhu J, Kalischewski F, Dou R F, Wedeking K, Chi L F 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 225504Google Scholar

    [10]

    Speth R L, Lauga E 2009 New J. Phys. 11 075024Google Scholar

    [11]

    Hopp S F, Heuer A 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 133 204101Google Scholar

    [12]

    Lied F, Mues T, Wang W C, Chi L F, Heuer A 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 136 024704Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhang H, Liu G, Wang W C, Chi L F, Yuan S L 2014 RSC Adv. 4 25005Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kotelyanskii M, Theodorou D N 2004 Simulation Methods for Polymers (Boca Raton: CRC Press

    [15]

    Neurock M, Hansen E W 1998 Comput. Chem. Eng. 22 S1045Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu G, Zhang H, Liu G K, Yuan S L 2016 Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 494 186Google Scholar

    [17]

    Liu G, Zhang H, Liu G K, Yuan S L, Zhu Q Z 2016 Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 509 401Google Scholar

    [18]

    Blel S, Hamouda A B H 2019 Results Phys. 12 1475Google Scholar

    [19]

    Jiang Y, Shi L, Chen N B, Hu L G, Wang W C, Nie Q M, Yan B 2023 Results Phys. 44 106145Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wang W C, Du C, Zhong D Y, Hirtz M, Wang Y, Lu N, Wu L X, Ebeling D, Li L Q, Fuchs H, Chi L F 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 4721Google Scholar

    [21]

    Kalischewski F, Heuer A 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 155421Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kalischewski F, Zhu J, Heuer A 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 155401Google Scholar

    [23]

    Klawtanong M, Srinitiwarawong C, Chatraphorn P 2018 Thin Solid Films 645 431Google Scholar

    [24]

    Huitema H E A, van der Eerden J P 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 3267Google Scholar

    [25]

    Larsson M I 2001 Phys. Rev. B 64 115428Google Scholar

    [26]

    Michely T, Krug J 2004 Islands, Mounds and Atoms (Vol. 42) (Berlin: Springer

    [27]

    Liu G, Zhang H, Wang W, Yuan S L 2015 Chem. Phys. Lett. 628 54Google Scholar

  • [1] 贺华丹, 钟琦超, 解文军. 声悬浮条件下双水相液滴的蒸发与相分离. 物理学报, 2024, 73(3): 034304. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20230963
    [2] 王晶, 焦阳, 田文得, 陈康. 低惯性与高惯性活性粒子混合体系中的相分离现象. 物理学报, 2023, 72(19): 190501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230792
    [3] 刘博阳, 宋文涛, 刘争晖, 孙晓娟, 王开明, 王亚坤, 张春玉, 陈科蓓, 徐耿钊, 徐科, 黎大兵. AlGaN表面相分离的同位微区荧光光谱和高空间分辨表面电势表征. 物理学报, 2020, 69(12): 127302. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200099
    [4] 梁燚然, 梁清. 带电纳米颗粒与相分离的带电生物膜之间相互作用的分子模拟. 物理学报, 2019, 68(2): 028701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181891
    [5] 段华, 李剑锋, 张红东. 二维情况下两组分带电囊泡形变耦合相分离的理论模拟研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(3): 038701. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171740
    [6] 纪丹丹, 张劭光. 三区域膜泡相分离模式之间转变的研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(18): 188701. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180828
    [7] 蒋滢, 陈征宇. 蠕虫状链模型在高分子物理研究中的应用. 物理学报, 2016, 65(17): 178201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.178201
    [8] 向俊尤, 王志国, 徐宝, 孙运斌, 吴鸿业, 赵建军, 鲁毅. 双层钙钛矿(La1-xGdx)4/3Sr5/3Mn2O7(x=0,0.05)的相分离. 物理学报, 2014, 63(15): 157501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.157501
    [9] 任群, 王楠, 张莉, 王建元, 郑亚萍, 姚文静. 调幅分解及形核对相分离作用机理研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(19): 196401. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.196401
    [10] 刘宁, 严国清, 毛强, 王桂英, 郭焕银. La0.3Ca0.7Mn1-xVxO3体系的有序相和再入型自旋玻璃行为研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(8): 5759-5765. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5759
    [11] 王强. Bi0.5Ca0.5Mn1-xCoxO3体系中的电荷有序和相分离. 物理学报, 2010, 59(9): 6569-6574. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6569
    [12] 李美丽, 付兴烨, 孙宏宁, 赵洪安, 李丛, 段永平, 闫元, 孙民华. 高压作用下相分离液体玻璃转变的分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(8): 5604-5609. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5604
    [13] 刘 锐, 李寅阊, 厚美瑛. 三维颗粒气体相分离现象. 物理学报, 2008, 57(8): 4660-4666. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4660
    [14] 李美丽, 张 迪, 孙宏宁, 付兴烨, 姚秀伟, 李 丛, 段永平, 闫 元, 牟洪臣, 孙民华. 二元Lennard-Jones液体的相分离过程及其扩散性质的分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(11): 7157-7163. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7157
    [15] 翟 薇, 王 楠, 魏炳波. 偏晶溶液相分离过程的实时观测研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(4): 2353-2358. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2353
    [16] 王瑞敏, 陈光德, 竹有章. 六方相InGaN外延膜的显微Raman散射. 物理学报, 2006, 55(2): 914-919. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.914
    [17] 蒋中英, 郁伟中, 黄彦君, 夏元复, 马淑新. SMMA/SMA共聚物共混物的自由体积的热动态特性与相分离行为的PALS研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(6): 3136-3140. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3136
    [18] 刘向荣, 王 楠, 魏炳波. 无容器条件下Cu-Pb偏晶的快速生长. 物理学报, 2005, 54(4): 1671-1678. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1671
    [19] 张华力, 刘 卫, 李栋才, 吴修胜, 陈初升. La2NiO4+δ体系相分离现象的低频内耗研究. 物理学报, 2004, 53(11): 3834-3838. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3834
    [20] 冯文强, 诸跃进. 外噪声场对二元混合物相分离的驱动作用. 物理学报, 2004, 53(11): 3690-3694. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3690
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1172
  • PDF下载量:  31
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-11-09
  • 修回日期:  2024-04-04
  • 上网日期:  2024-04-28
  • 刊出日期:  2024-06-20

/

返回文章
返回