搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

非掺杂型Si/SiGe异质结外延与表征

耿鑫 张结印 卢文龙 明铭 刘方泽 符彬啸 褚逸昕 颜谋回 王保传 张新定 郭国平 张建军

引用本文:
Citation:

非掺杂型Si/SiGe异质结外延与表征

耿鑫, 张结印, 卢文龙, 明铭, 刘方泽, 符彬啸, 褚逸昕, 颜谋回, 王保传, 张新定, 郭国平, 张建军

Epitaxy and characterization of undoped Si/SiGe heterojunctions

Geng Xin, Zhang Jie-Yin, Lu Wen-Long, Ming Ming, Liu Fang-Ze, Fu Bin-Xiao, Chu Yi-Xin, Yan Mou-Hui, Wang Bao-Chuan, Zhang Xin-Ding, Guo Guo-Ping, Zhang Jian-Jun
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 以自旋为编码单元的硅基半导体量子计算与传统微电子工艺兼容, 易拓展且可以同位素纯化提高退相干时间, 因而备受关注. 本研究工作通过分子束外延生长了高质量非掺杂型Si/SiGe异质结并测试了二维电子气迁移率. 球差电镜观察到原子级尖锐界面, 原子力显微镜表征显示其表面均方根粗糙度仅为0.44 nm, 低温下迁移率达到20.21×104 cm2·V–1·s–1. 不同栅压下载流子浓度和迁移率的幂指数为1.026, 材料丁格比值在7—12之间, 表明载流子主要受到背景杂质散射和半导体/氧化物的界面散射.
    Silicon-based semiconductor quantum computing with spin as the encoding unit is compatible with traditional microelectronic processes, easy to expand, and can improve isotope purification and decoherence time, thus attracting much attention. There are fewer reports on the work related to undoped Si/SiGe heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy than those on chemical vapor deposition. An undoped Si/SiGe heterostructure is grown by molecular beam epitaxy (see the attached figure below). The results from scanning transmission electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectroscopy mapping show an atomic-scale interface with a characteristic length of 0.53 nm. The surface root-mean-square roughness measured by atomic force microscope is 0.44 nm. The X-ray diffraction data show that the Si quantum well is fully strained and the in-plane strain is 1.03%. In addition, the performance of the two-dimensional electron gas is evaluated by low-temperature Hall measurements, which are conducted in the Hall-bar shaped field-effect transistor. The peak mobility is 20.21×104 cm2·V–1·s–1 when the carrier density is about 6.265×1011 cm–2 at 250 mK. The percolation density is 1.465×1011 cm–2. The effective mass of the two-dimensional electron gas is approximately 0.19m0. The power exponential between carrier density and mobility at different gate voltages is 1.026, and the Dingle ratio of the two-dimensional electron gas is in a range of 7–12, indicating that the electrons are scattered by background impurities and semiconductor/oxide interfaces charges. The atomically sharp interface of Si/SiGe heterostructures created by molecular beam epitaxy is beneficial for studying the valley physics properties in silicon. The structural and transport characterizations in this paper lay the foundation for the optimization of Si-based semiconductor quantum dot quantum computing materials.
      通信作者: 张结印, zhangjieyin@sslab.org.cn ; 张新定, xdzhang@scnu.edu.cn ; 张建军, jjzhang@iphy.ac.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 92165207, 62225407, 12304100)、松山湖材料实验室支持项目(批准号: XMYS2023002)和国家科创2030项目(批准号: 2021ZD0302300)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Zhang Jie-Yin, zhangjieyin@sslab.org.cn ; Zhang Xin-Ding, xdzhang@scnu.edu.cn ; Zhang Jian-Jun, jjzhang@iphy.ac.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 92165207, 62225407, 12304100), the Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, China (Grant No. XMYS2023002), and the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 2021ZD0302300).
    [1]

    王宁, 王保传, 郭国平 2022 物理学报 71 230301Google Scholar

    Wang N, Wang B C, Guo G P 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 230301Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhang J J, Li H O, Guo G P 2024 Sci. Sin. Inf. 54 102Google Scholar

    [3]

    张结印, 高飞, 张建军 2021 物理学报 70 217802Google Scholar

    Zhang J Y, Gao F, Zhang J J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 217802Google Scholar

    [4]

    Petta J, Johnson A, Taylor J, Laird E, Yacoby A, Lukin M, Marcus C, Hanson M, Gossard A 2005 Science 309 2180Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yoneda J, Otsuka T, Nakajima T, Takakura T, Obata T, Pioro-Ladrière M, Lu H, Palmstrøm C J, Gossard A C, Tarucha S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 267601Google Scholar

    [6]

    Nadj-Perge S, Frolov S M, Bakkers E P, Kouwenhoven L P 2010 Nature 468 1084Google Scholar

    [7]

    van den Berg J W G, Nadj-Perge S, Pribiag V S, Plissard S R, Bakkers E P A M, Frolov S M, Kouwenhoven L P 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 066806Google Scholar

    [8]

    Li R, Hudson F E, Dzurak A S, Hamilton A R 2015 Nano Lett. 15 7314Google Scholar

    [9]

    Borselli M G, Eng K, Croke E T, Maune B M, Huang B, Ross R S, Kiselev A A, Deelman P W, Alvarado-Rodriguez I, Schmitz A E, Sokolich M, Holabird K S, Hazard T M, Gyure M F, Hunter A T 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 063109Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hendrickx N W, Lawrie W I L, Russ M, van Riggelen F, de Snoo S L, Schouten R N, Sammak A, Scappucci G, Veldhorst M 2021 Nature 591 580Google Scholar

    [11]

    Madzik M T, Asaad S, Youssry A, Joecker B, Rudinger K M, Nielsen E, Young K C, Proctor T J, Baczewski A D, Laucht A, Schmitt V, Hudson F E, Itoh K M, Jakob A M, Johnson B C, Jamieson D N, Dzurak A S, Ferrie C, Blume-Kohout R, Morello A 2022 Nature 601 348Google Scholar

    [12]

    高飞, 冯琦, 王霆, 张建军 2020 物理学报 69 028102Google Scholar

    Gao F, Feng Q, Wang T, Zhang J J 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 028102Google Scholar

    [13]

    Xu G, Gao F, Wang K, Zhang T, Liu H, Cao G, Wang T, Zhang J J, Jiang H W, Li H O, Guo G P 2020 Appl. Phys. Express 13 065002Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xu G, Li Y, Gao F, Li H O, Liu H, Wang K, Cao G, Wang T, Zhang J J, Guo G C, Guo G P 2020 New J. Phys. 22 083068Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wang K, Xu G, Gao F, Liu H, Ma R L, Zhang X, Wang Z, Cao G, Wang T, Zhang J J, Culcer D, Hu X, Jiang H W, Li H O, Guo G C, Guo G P 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 206Google Scholar

    [16]

    Watzinger H, Kukučka J, Vukušić L, Gao F, Wang T, Schäffler F, Zhang J J, Katsaros G 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3902Google Scholar

    [17]

    Stano P, Loss D 2022 Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 672Google Scholar

    [18]

    Takeda K, Kamioka J, Otsuka T, Yoneda J, Nakajima T, Delbecq M R, Amaha S, Allison G, Kodera T, Oda S, Tarucha S 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1600694Google Scholar

    [19]

    Yoneda J, Takeda K, Otsuka T, Nakajima T, Delbecq M R, Allison G, Honda T, Kodera T, Oda S, Hoshi Y, Usami N, Itoh K M, Tarucha S 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 102Google Scholar

    [20]

    Xue X, Russ M, Samkharadze N, Undseth B, Sammak A, Scappucci G, Vandersypen L M K 2022 Nature 601 343Google Scholar

    [21]

    Takeda K, Noiri A, Nakajima T, Kobayashi T, Tarucha S 2022 Nature 608 682Google Scholar

    [22]

    Mills A R, Guinn C R, Gullans M J, Sigillito A J, Feldman M M, Nielsen E, Petta J R 2022 Sci. Adv. 8 5Google Scholar

    [23]

    Philips S G J, Mądzik M T, Amitonov S V, de Snoo S L, Russ M, Kalhor N, Volk C, Lawrie W I L, Brousse D, Tryputen L, Wuetz B P, Sammak A, Veldhorst M, Scappucci G, Vandersypen L M K 2022 Nature 609 919Google Scholar

    [24]

    Paquelet Wuetz B, Bavdaz P L, Yeoh L A, Schouten R, van der Does H, Tiggelman M, Sabbagh D, Sammak A, Almudever C G, Sebastiano F, Clarke J S, Veldhorst M, Scappucci G 2020 NPJ Quantum Inf. 6 43Google Scholar

    [25]

    Mi X, Cady J V, Zajac D M, Stehlik J, Edge L F, Petta J R 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 043502Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chung Y J, Villegas Rosales K A, Baldwin K W, Madathil P T, West K W, Shayegan M, Pfeiffer L N 2021 Nat. Mater. 20 632Google Scholar

    [27]

    Weitz P, Haug R J, von Klitzing K, Schäffler F 1996 Surf. Sci. 361-362 542Google Scholar

    [28]

    Goswami S, Slinker K A, Friesen M, McGuire L M, Truitt J L, Tahan C, Klein L J, Chu J O, Mooney P M, van der Weide D W, Joynt R, Coppersmith S N, Eriksson M A 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 41Google Scholar

    [29]

    Zhang D D, Lu J, Liu Z, Wan F S, Liu X Q, Pang Y Q, Zhu Y P, Cheng B W, Zheng J, Zuo Y H, Xue C L 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 6

    [30]

    Laroche D, Huang S H, Nielsen E, Chuang Y, Li J Y, Liu C W, Lu T M 2015 AIP Adv. 5 107106Google Scholar

    [31]

    Tracy L A, Hwang E H, Eng K, Ten Eyck G A, Nordberg E P, Childs K, Carroll M S, Lilly M P, Das Sarma S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 235307Google Scholar

    [32]

    Kim J S, Tyryshkin A M, Lyon S A 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 123505Google Scholar

    [33]

    Coleridge P T 1990 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 5 961Google Scholar

    [34]

    Mi X, Hazard T M, Payette C, Wang K, Zajac D M, Cady J V, Petta J R 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 035304Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang K, Li H O, Luo G, Zhang X, Jing F M, Hu R Z, Zhou Y, Liu H, Wang G L, Cao G, Jiang H W, Guo G P 2020 Europhys. Lett. 130 27001Google Scholar

    [36]

    Monroe D, Xie Y H, Fitzgerald E A, Silverman P J, Watson G P 1993 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct.—Process. Meas. Phenom. 11 1731

  • 图 1  (a) 硅基Si/SiGe异质结结构示意图; (b) MBE 制备SiGe/Si QW/SiGe/Si 结构的 STEM-HAADF图; (c), (d) 量子阱附近Si, Ge元素的EDS谱; (e) SiGe/Si/SiGe 高倍STEM-HAADF图像; (f) Si 量子阱上界面的STEM-HAADF原子图像

    Fig. 1.  (a) Schematic of Si/SiGe heterostructure on Si (001); (b) STEM-HAADF of SiGe/Si QW/SiGe/Si heterostructure grown by MBE; (c), (d) EDS of Si and Ge distribution around quantum well; (e) magnified STEM-HADDF of SiGe/Si/SiGe; (f) atomic-scale STEM-HADDF image of the Si/SiGe interface.

    图 2  (a) 样品表面的原子力显微镜图像; (b) ($ \bar{2}, \bar{2},4 $)方向XRD-RSM图

    Fig. 2.  (a) Surface morphology of the heterostructure measured by AFM; (b) RSM around the asymmetric ($ \bar{2}, \bar{2},4 $) direction of the heterostructure.

    图 3  (a) 霍尔器件的光显图和截面示意图; (b) 载流子浓度和载流子迁移率随栅极电压变化的曲线; (c) 载流子迁移率与载流子浓度的对应关系曲线; (d) 纵向电导率随载流子浓度变化的关系(虚线是根据渗透理论拟合的曲线); (e) 栅极电压为2 V时的纵向电阻率和横向电阻率随磁场的变化

    Fig. 3.  (a) Optical microscope diagram and cross-sectional schematic view of Hall device; (b) carrier density and mobility as a function of the gate voltage Vg; (c) density-dependent mobility; (d) density-dependent conductivity, the dashed line is a fit based on the percolation theory; (e) transverse Hall resistivity and longitudinal resistivity as a function of the magnetic field.

    图 4  (a) 不同温度下SdH振荡曲线; (b) 不同温度下去除噪音的SdH振荡曲线; (c) Δρxxρ0在不同磁场强度下随温度的变换曲线; (d) 不同载流子浓度下有效质量m*随磁场B的变化

    Fig. 4.  (a) Longitudinal resistivity as a function of magnetic field for different temperatures; (b) oscillation amplitude of the longitudinal resistivity as a function of the magnetic field; (c) Δρxxρ0 for different temperatures, different colors represent different magnetic fields from 0.55 T to 0.82 T, dashed lines are the fits for extracting effective mass; (d) effective mass as a function of the magnetic field at various densities.

    图 5  (a) 不同载流子浓度下的Sdh振荡曲线; (b) 不同载流子浓度下$\ln \Big(\dfrac{\Delta \rho_{xx} {\rm sinh}(\alpha T_0)}{\alpha T_0}\Big) $随1/B的变化曲线; (c) 量子寿命τq, τt随着载流子浓度变化的曲线; (d) 丁格比(τqt)随载流子浓度的变化曲线

    Fig. 5.  (a) Longitudinal resistivity as a function of magnetic field under various carrier densities; (b) the variation curve of $\ln \Big(\dfrac{\Delta \rho_{xx} {\rm sinh}(\alpha T_0)}{\alpha T_0}\Big) $ with 1/B under different carrier densities; (c) τq and τt at different carrier densities; (d) carrier density-dependent Dingle plot (τqt).

  • [1]

    王宁, 王保传, 郭国平 2022 物理学报 71 230301Google Scholar

    Wang N, Wang B C, Guo G P 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 230301Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhang J J, Li H O, Guo G P 2024 Sci. Sin. Inf. 54 102Google Scholar

    [3]

    张结印, 高飞, 张建军 2021 物理学报 70 217802Google Scholar

    Zhang J Y, Gao F, Zhang J J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 217802Google Scholar

    [4]

    Petta J, Johnson A, Taylor J, Laird E, Yacoby A, Lukin M, Marcus C, Hanson M, Gossard A 2005 Science 309 2180Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yoneda J, Otsuka T, Nakajima T, Takakura T, Obata T, Pioro-Ladrière M, Lu H, Palmstrøm C J, Gossard A C, Tarucha S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 267601Google Scholar

    [6]

    Nadj-Perge S, Frolov S M, Bakkers E P, Kouwenhoven L P 2010 Nature 468 1084Google Scholar

    [7]

    van den Berg J W G, Nadj-Perge S, Pribiag V S, Plissard S R, Bakkers E P A M, Frolov S M, Kouwenhoven L P 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 066806Google Scholar

    [8]

    Li R, Hudson F E, Dzurak A S, Hamilton A R 2015 Nano Lett. 15 7314Google Scholar

    [9]

    Borselli M G, Eng K, Croke E T, Maune B M, Huang B, Ross R S, Kiselev A A, Deelman P W, Alvarado-Rodriguez I, Schmitz A E, Sokolich M, Holabird K S, Hazard T M, Gyure M F, Hunter A T 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 063109Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hendrickx N W, Lawrie W I L, Russ M, van Riggelen F, de Snoo S L, Schouten R N, Sammak A, Scappucci G, Veldhorst M 2021 Nature 591 580Google Scholar

    [11]

    Madzik M T, Asaad S, Youssry A, Joecker B, Rudinger K M, Nielsen E, Young K C, Proctor T J, Baczewski A D, Laucht A, Schmitt V, Hudson F E, Itoh K M, Jakob A M, Johnson B C, Jamieson D N, Dzurak A S, Ferrie C, Blume-Kohout R, Morello A 2022 Nature 601 348Google Scholar

    [12]

    高飞, 冯琦, 王霆, 张建军 2020 物理学报 69 028102Google Scholar

    Gao F, Feng Q, Wang T, Zhang J J 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 028102Google Scholar

    [13]

    Xu G, Gao F, Wang K, Zhang T, Liu H, Cao G, Wang T, Zhang J J, Jiang H W, Li H O, Guo G P 2020 Appl. Phys. Express 13 065002Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xu G, Li Y, Gao F, Li H O, Liu H, Wang K, Cao G, Wang T, Zhang J J, Guo G C, Guo G P 2020 New J. Phys. 22 083068Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wang K, Xu G, Gao F, Liu H, Ma R L, Zhang X, Wang Z, Cao G, Wang T, Zhang J J, Culcer D, Hu X, Jiang H W, Li H O, Guo G C, Guo G P 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 206Google Scholar

    [16]

    Watzinger H, Kukučka J, Vukušić L, Gao F, Wang T, Schäffler F, Zhang J J, Katsaros G 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3902Google Scholar

    [17]

    Stano P, Loss D 2022 Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 672Google Scholar

    [18]

    Takeda K, Kamioka J, Otsuka T, Yoneda J, Nakajima T, Delbecq M R, Amaha S, Allison G, Kodera T, Oda S, Tarucha S 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1600694Google Scholar

    [19]

    Yoneda J, Takeda K, Otsuka T, Nakajima T, Delbecq M R, Allison G, Honda T, Kodera T, Oda S, Hoshi Y, Usami N, Itoh K M, Tarucha S 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 102Google Scholar

    [20]

    Xue X, Russ M, Samkharadze N, Undseth B, Sammak A, Scappucci G, Vandersypen L M K 2022 Nature 601 343Google Scholar

    [21]

    Takeda K, Noiri A, Nakajima T, Kobayashi T, Tarucha S 2022 Nature 608 682Google Scholar

    [22]

    Mills A R, Guinn C R, Gullans M J, Sigillito A J, Feldman M M, Nielsen E, Petta J R 2022 Sci. Adv. 8 5Google Scholar

    [23]

    Philips S G J, Mądzik M T, Amitonov S V, de Snoo S L, Russ M, Kalhor N, Volk C, Lawrie W I L, Brousse D, Tryputen L, Wuetz B P, Sammak A, Veldhorst M, Scappucci G, Vandersypen L M K 2022 Nature 609 919Google Scholar

    [24]

    Paquelet Wuetz B, Bavdaz P L, Yeoh L A, Schouten R, van der Does H, Tiggelman M, Sabbagh D, Sammak A, Almudever C G, Sebastiano F, Clarke J S, Veldhorst M, Scappucci G 2020 NPJ Quantum Inf. 6 43Google Scholar

    [25]

    Mi X, Cady J V, Zajac D M, Stehlik J, Edge L F, Petta J R 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 043502Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chung Y J, Villegas Rosales K A, Baldwin K W, Madathil P T, West K W, Shayegan M, Pfeiffer L N 2021 Nat. Mater. 20 632Google Scholar

    [27]

    Weitz P, Haug R J, von Klitzing K, Schäffler F 1996 Surf. Sci. 361-362 542Google Scholar

    [28]

    Goswami S, Slinker K A, Friesen M, McGuire L M, Truitt J L, Tahan C, Klein L J, Chu J O, Mooney P M, van der Weide D W, Joynt R, Coppersmith S N, Eriksson M A 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 41Google Scholar

    [29]

    Zhang D D, Lu J, Liu Z, Wan F S, Liu X Q, Pang Y Q, Zhu Y P, Cheng B W, Zheng J, Zuo Y H, Xue C L 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 6

    [30]

    Laroche D, Huang S H, Nielsen E, Chuang Y, Li J Y, Liu C W, Lu T M 2015 AIP Adv. 5 107106Google Scholar

    [31]

    Tracy L A, Hwang E H, Eng K, Ten Eyck G A, Nordberg E P, Childs K, Carroll M S, Lilly M P, Das Sarma S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 235307Google Scholar

    [32]

    Kim J S, Tyryshkin A M, Lyon S A 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 123505Google Scholar

    [33]

    Coleridge P T 1990 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 5 961Google Scholar

    [34]

    Mi X, Hazard T M, Payette C, Wang K, Zajac D M, Cady J V, Petta J R 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 035304Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang K, Li H O, Luo G, Zhang X, Jing F M, Hu R Z, Zhou Y, Liu H, Wang G L, Cao G, Jiang H W, Guo G P 2020 Europhys. Lett. 130 27001Google Scholar

    [36]

    Monroe D, Xie Y H, Fitzgerald E A, Silverman P J, Watson G P 1993 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct.—Process. Meas. Phenom. 11 1731

  • [1] 冉峰, 梁艳, 张坚地. 氧化物异质界面上的准二维超导. 物理学报, 2023, 72(9): 097401. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230044
    [2] 周书星, 方仁凤, 魏彦锋, 陈传亮, 曹文彧, 张欣, 艾立鹍, 李豫东, 郭旗. 磷化铟高电子迁移率晶体管外延结构材料抗电子辐照加固设计. 物理学报, 2022, 71(3): 037202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211265
    [3] 张雪冰, 刘乃漳, 姚若河. AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管中二维电子气的极化光学声子散射. 物理学报, 2020, 69(15): 157303. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200250
    [4] 曹亚庆, 黄火林, 孙仲豪, 李飞雨, 白洪亮, 张卉, 孙楠, Yung C.Liang. 基于宽禁带GaN基异质结结构的垂直型高温霍尔传感器. 物理学报, 2019, 68(15): 158502. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190413
    [5] 马嵩松, 舒天宇, 朱家旗, 李锴, 吴惠桢. Ⅳ-Ⅵ族化合物半导体异质结二维电子气研究进展. 物理学报, 2019, 68(16): 166801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191074
    [6] 李群, 陈谦, 种景. InAlN/GaN异质结二维电子气波函数的变分法研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(2): 027303. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171827
    [7] 王现彬, 赵正平, 冯志红. N极性GaN/AlGaN异质结二维电子气模拟. 物理学报, 2014, 63(8): 080202. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.080202
    [8] 王红培, 王广龙, 喻颖, 徐应强, 倪海桥, 牛智川, 高凤岐. 内嵌InAs量子点的δ掺杂GaAs/AlxGa1-xAs二维电子气特性分析. 物理学报, 2013, 62(20): 207303. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.207303
    [9] 张阳, 顾书林, 叶建东, 黄时敏, 顾然, 陈斌, 朱顺明, 郑有炓. ZnMgO/ZnO异质结构中二维电子气的研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 150202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.150202
    [10] 王威, 周文政, 韦尚江, 李小娟, 常志刚, 林铁, 商丽燕, 韩奎, 段俊熙, 唐宁, 沈波, 褚君浩. GaN/AlxGa1-xN异质结二维电子气的磁电阻研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(23): 237302. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.237302
    [11] 张金风, 王平亚, 薛军帅, 周勇波, 张进成, 郝跃. 高电子迁移率晶格匹配InAlN/GaN材料研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(11): 117305. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.117305
    [12] 商丽燕, 林 铁, 周文政, 黄志明, 李东临, 高宏玲, 崔利杰, 曾一平, 郭少令, 褚君浩. In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As量子阱中双子带占据的二维电子气的输运特性. 物理学报, 2008, 57(4): 2481-2485. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2481
    [13] 周文政, 林 铁, 商丽燕, 黄志明, 朱 博, 崔利杰, 高宏玲, 李东临, 郭少令, 桂永胜, 褚君浩. 双δ掺杂In0.65Ga0.35As/In0.52Al0.48As赝型高迁移率晶体管材料子带电子特性研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(7): 4143-4147. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4143
    [14] 高宏玲, 李东临, 周文政, 商丽燕, 王宝强, 朱战平, 曾一平. 不同量子阱宽度的InP基In0.53GaAs/In0.52AlAs高电子迁移率晶体管材料二维电子气的性能研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(8): 4955-4959. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4955
    [15] 周文政, 林 铁, 商丽燕, 黄志明, 崔利杰, 李东临, 高宏玲, 曾一平, 郭少令, 桂永胜, 褚君浩. InAlAs/InGaAs/InAlAs量子阱高迁移率二维电子气系统中的反弱局域效应研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(7): 4099-4104. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4099
    [16] 李东临, 曾一平. InP基HEMT器件中二维电子气浓度及分布与沟道层厚度关系的理论分析. 物理学报, 2006, 55(7): 3677-3682. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3677
    [17] 周文政, 姚 炜, 朱 博, 仇志军, 郭少令, 林 铁, 崔利杰, 桂永胜, 褚君浩. 单边掺杂InAlAs/InGaAs单量子阱中二维电子气的磁输运特性. 物理学报, 2006, 55(4): 2044-2048. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2044
    [18] 孔月婵, 郑有炓, 周春红, 邓永桢, 顾书林, 沈 波, 张 荣, 韩 平, 江若琏, 施 毅. AlGaN/GaN异质结构中极化与势垒层掺杂对二维电子气的影响. 物理学报, 2004, 53(7): 2320-2324. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.2320
    [19] 孔月婵, 郑有炓, 储荣明, 顾书林. AlxGa1-xN/GaN异质结构中Al组分对二维电子气性质的影响. 物理学报, 2003, 52(7): 1756-1760. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1756
    [20] 吕永良, 周世平, 徐得名. 光照下高电子迁移率晶体管特性分析. 物理学报, 2000, 49(7): 1394-1399. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.1394
计量
  • 文章访问数:  753
  • PDF下载量:  43
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-03-01
  • 修回日期:  2024-03-29
  • 上网日期:  2024-04-16
  • 刊出日期:  2024-06-05

/

返回文章
返回