-
实现国家标准时间的自主可控在当前的国际形式下具有重要现实意义. 本文通过研究基于自研铯基准钟和国产光抽运守时小铯钟, 产生一个独立的、不依赖于外部参考的时间尺度. 具体做法是将铯基准钟作为频率参考, 用于预报光抽运守时小铯钟的频率漂移. 通过分析光抽运守时小铯钟的噪声特性, 建立了原子钟的状态方程, 基于Kalman滤波算法估计光抽运守时小铯钟的状态. 时间尺度的计算是基于原子钟的频率状态估计和频率漂移状态估计作为预报值, 通过权重算法实现. 研究了基于预测误差的权重算法和噪声特性的权重算法, 结果表明利用Kalman滤波状态估计的情况下, 基于预测误差的权重算法显著提升了独立时间尺度的准确度. 选用铯基准钟作为频率参考, 用于预报光抽运守时小铯钟的频率漂移, 计算得到的独立时间尺度的准确度和长期稳定度明显优于时间尺度本身作为频率参考的情况. 以国际标准时间UTCr为参考得出独立时间尺度的准确度保持在15 ns以内. 取样间隔为1 d的频率稳定度为1.57 × 10–14, 取样间隔为15 d的频率稳定度为4.29 × 10–15, 取样间隔为30 d的频率稳定度为2.87 × 10–15. 可满足当前国家用时需求.Realizing the independent control of the national standard time has important practical significance under the current international situation. In this work, an independent time scale that does not rely on external references is developed by studying the self-developed cesium fountain primary frequency standard and domestically-produced optically-pumped small cesium clocks. The specific approach is to use the cesium fountain primary frequency standard as a frequency reference to predict the frequency drift of the optically pumped small cesium clocks. By analyzing the noise characteristics of the optically pumped small cesium clocks, the state equation of the atomic clock is established, and the state of the optically pumped small cesium clock is estimated based on the Kalman filtering algorithm. The calculation of the time scale is based on the frequency state estimation and frequency drift state estimation of atomic clocks, which serve as the forecast values, and is achieved through the weight algorithm. The weight algorithm based on prediction error and the weight algorithm based on noise characteristics are studied. The results show that in the case of using Kalman filtering state estimation, the weight algorithm based on prediction error significantly improves the accuracy of the independent time scale. The cesium fountain primary frequency standard is chosen as the frequency reference to predict the frequency drift of the optically pumped small cesium clock. The accuracy and long-term stability of the independent time scale calculated are much better than those when the time scale itself is used as the frequency reference. Taking the international standard time (UTCr) as the reference, the accuracy of the independent time scale is maintained within 15 ns. The frequency stability is 1.57 × 10–14 for a sampling interval of 1 day, 4.29 × 10–15 for a sampling interval of 15 days, and 2.87 × 10–15 for a sampling interval of 30 days is showing that its stability can meet the current national time demand.
-
Keywords:
- atomic clock state model /
- atomic clock noise /
- time scale /
- Kaman filtering
-
图 1 氢原子钟HM5085相对于铯基准钟测量频率偏差的Allan偏差曲线
Fig. 1. Allan deviation curves of the measurement frequency deviation of the hydrogen atom clock HM5085 relative to cesium atomic fountain clock.
图 2 光抽运守时小铯钟的Allan偏差曲线
Fig. 2. The Allan deviation curves of optically pumped small cesium clocks.
图 5 基于预测误差计算权重的时间尺度的相位偏差
Fig. 5. Phase deviation curve of the time scale with weights calculated based on the prediction error.
图 6 基于预测误差计算权重的时间尺度与原子钟的Allan偏差曲线
Fig. 6. Allan deviation curve of the time scale based on the weight of prediction error and Allan deviation curves of atomic clocks.
图 7 基于噪声特性计算权重的时间尺度的相位偏差
Fig. 7. Phase deviation curve of the time scale with weights based on the noise characteristics.
图 8 两种不同取权算法的时间尺度的Allan偏差曲线
Fig. 8. Allan deviation curves of the time scale of two different weighting algorithms.
图 9 基于不同参考预报频率漂移的时间尺度的相位偏差
Fig. 9. Phase deviation of the time scale based on different reference forecast frequency drifts.
图 10 基于不同参考预报频率漂移的时间尺度的Allan 偏差曲线
Fig. 10. Allan deviation curves based on the time scale of different reference forecast frequency drifts.
图 11 时间尺度相对于UTCr的相位偏差
Fig. 11. Phase deviation curve of the time scale relative to UTCr.
图 13 时间尺度相对于UTCr的相位偏差
Fig. 13. Phase deviation curve of the time scale relative to UTCr.
表 1 不同取权方法的时间尺度的准确度比较
Table 1. Comparison of time scale accuracy of different weighting methods.
不同取权
方法最大误差/ns 最小误差/ns 均值/ns 标准偏差/ns 预测误差
取权9.44 –12.25 –0.17 4.22 噪声特性
取权8.43 –18.22 –6.12 5.51 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同取权方法的时间尺度的稳定度比较
Table 2. Comparison of time scale stability of different weighting methods.
平均时间/d 1 5 10 20 30 预测误差
取权1.56×
10–148.11×
10–155.15×
10–153.24×
10–152.59×
10–15噪声特性
取权1.49×
10–147.13×
10–154.61×
10–152.94×
10–152.51×
10–15
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 原子钟与时间尺度相对于UTCr的Allan偏差
Table 3. The Allan deviation of atomic clocks and time scale relative to UTCr.
取样间隔/d Cs3050 Cs3059 时间尺度 1 3.80×10–14 3.39×10–14 1.57×10–14 5 2.06×10–14 1.36×10–14 8.81×10–15 10 1.23×10–14 1.30×10–14 4.91×10–15 15 1.85×10–14 1.58×10–14 4.29×10–15 30 *** *** 2.87×10–15
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Greenhall C A 2003 Metrologia 40 S335
Google Scholar
[2] Panfilo G, Harmegnies A, Tisserand L 2012 Metrologia 49 49
Google Scholar
[3] Panfilo G, Harmegnies A, Tisserand L 2014 Metrologia 51 285
Google Scholar
[4] Song H J, Dong S W, Zhang Y, Wang X, Guo D, An W, Qi Y, Zhang S G 2025 Phys. Scr. 100 015217
Google Scholar
[5] 宋会杰, 董绍武, 王翔, 姜萌, 章宇, 郭栋, 张继海 2024 物理学报 73 060201
Google Scholar
Song H J, Dong S W, Wang X, Jiang M, Zhang Y, Guo D, Zhang J H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 060201
Google Scholar
[6] Song H J, Dong S W, Qu L L, Wang X, Guo D 2021 J. Instrum. 16 P06032
Google Scholar
[7] 宋会杰, 董绍武, 王翔, 章宇, 王燕平 2020 物理学报 69 170201
Google Scholar
Song H J, Dong S W, Wang X, Zhang Y, Wang Y P 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 170201
Google Scholar
[8] Song H J, Dong S W, Wu W J, Jiang M, Wang W X 2018 Metrologia 55 350
Google Scholar
[9] 刘云, 王文海, 贺德晶, 周勇壮, 沈咏, 邹宏新 2023 物理学报 72 184202
Google Scholar
Liu Y, Wang W H, He D J, Zhou Y Z, Shen Y, Zou H X 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 184202
Google Scholar
[10] 梁悦, 谢勇辉, 陈鹏飞, 帅涛, 裴雨贤, 徐昊天, 赵阳, 夏天, 潘晓燕, 张朋军, 林传富 2023 物理学报 72 013702
Google Scholar
Liang Y, Xie Y H, Chen P F, Shuai T, Pei Y X, Xu H T, Zhao Y, Xia T, Pan X Y, Zhang P J, Lin C F 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 013702
Google Scholar
[11] 邵晓东, 韩海年, 魏志义 2021 物理学报 70 134204
Google Scholar
Shao X D, Han H N, Wei Z Y 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 134204
Google Scholar
[12] He X, Yuan Z C, Chen J Y, Fang S W, Chen X Z, Wang Q, Qi X H 2022 Front. Phys. 10 970030
Google Scholar
[13] Shi H B, Qin X M, Chen H J, Yan Y F, Lu Z Q, Wang Z Y, Liu Z J, Guan X L, Wei Q, Shi T T, Chen J B 2025 Phys. Rev. Appl. 23 034018
Google Scholar
[14] Guo G K, Li C, Hou D, Liu K, Sun F Y, Zhang S G 2023 Appl. Sci. 13 9155
Google Scholar
[15] Domnin Y S, Baryshev V N, Boyko A I, Elkin G A, Novoselov A V, Kopylov L N, Kupalov D S 2013 Meas. Tech. 55 1155
Google Scholar
[16] Levi F, Calonico D, Calosso C E, Godone A, Micalizio S, Costanzo G A 2014 Metrologia 51 270
Google Scholar
[17] Shi J R, Wang X L, Yang F, Bai Y, Guan Y, Fan S C, Liu D D, Ruan J, Zhang S G 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 040602
Google Scholar
[18] Wang X L, Ruan J, Liu D D, Guan Y, Shi J R, Yang F, Bai Y, Zhang H, Fan S C, Wu W J, Zhao S H, Zhang S G 2023 Metrologia 60 065012
Google Scholar
[19] Rovera G D, Bize S, Chupin B, Guéna J, Laurent P H, Rosenbusch P, Uhrich P, Abgrall M 2016 Metrologia 53 S81
Google Scholar
[20] Bauch A, Weyers S, Piester D, Staliuniene E, Yang W 2012 Metrologia 49 180
Google Scholar
[21] Galleani L, Signorile G, Formichella V, Sesia I 2020 Metrologia 57 065015
Google Scholar
[22] 宋会杰, 董绍武, 王翔, 王燕平, 张继海, 屈俐俐, 赵书红, 张首刚 2022 时间频率学报 45 270
Song H J, Dong S W, Wang X, Wang Y P, Zhang J H, Qu L L, Zhao S H, Zhang S G 2022 J. Time Freq. 45 270
[23] Zucca C, Tavella P 2005 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 52 289
Google Scholar
[24] Stein S R 1992 24th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Applications and Planning Meeting McLean, VA, December 1—3, 1992 p289
[25] Coleman M J, Beard R L 2020 Navigation 67 333
Google Scholar
[26] Wang X B, Shi F F, Gong D L, Xu S Y, Li Z N, Fu G T, Li Q 2020 Metrologia 57 065009
Google Scholar
[27] Greenhall C A, 2001 33rd Annual precise time and time interval systems and applications meeting, Long Beach, CA, November 27—29, 2001 p445
[28] Wu Y W, Liu S R 2023 Metrologia 60 065009
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 237
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
