-
With their high toxicity and fast diffusion, toxic agents such as mustard gas and sarin are chemical warfare agents that are of high lethality and difficult to protect against. Therefore the high-sensitivity detection of toxic agents has become a focus in research on chemical detection in the world. Two-dimensional (2D) MoS2 is at the forefront of research because of its unique structure and promising sensing performance. In this study, theoretical calculations based on the first-principles method are carried out to investigate the structural stability, electronic properties, and gas adsorption of 2D MoS2 before and after V doping in order to explain the gas-sensing mechanism of V-doped 2D MoS2. The binding energy of V atom at the S-vacancy is –6.85 eV, indicating that the V atom can be stably doped into the S vacancy of the 2D MoS2 supercell structure at room temperature due to the strong interaction between the doped V atom and S vacancy of monolayer MoS2. The V atom doped into the 2D MoS2 system gives out electrons to surrounding Mo atoms as a donor center, thus enhancing the electric conductivity of the material. The calculation of adsorption energy indicates that the adsorption process of NO2, NH3, sarin, and mustard gas on the surface of 2D MoS2 are all spontaneous exothermic reactions. The doping of V increases the adsorption capacity of 2D MoS2 for the 4 aforesaid gases, and strengthens the interaction between the electrons of the absorbate molecules and those of substrate surface, thus effectively enhancing the gas-sensitive property of 2D MoS2. This effect occurs due to the strong overlap between the V 3d orbitals and gas molecule orbitals, which promotes the activation of the adsorbed gas molecules. The analysis of Bader charge shows that the charge transfer occurs from V-doped monolayer MoS2 to the oxidizing gas molecules (NO2, sarin, and mustard gas) acting as acceptors. Whereas the direction of charge transfers is reversed for the adsorption of the reducing gas (NH3) behaving as donors, in which 0.11e transfer from adsorbed gas to metal V-doped monolayer MoS2. Our results suggest that V-doped monolayer MoS2 is an ideal candidate for low-cost, highly active, and stable gas sensors, which provides an avenue to the design of high active 2D MoS2-based gas sensors.
-
Keywords:
- V-doping /
- 2 dimensional MoS2 /
- first principles calculation /
- gas-sensing mechanism
[1] 郑祖庆 1995 交通与港航 9 41
Zheng Z Q 1995 Public Util. 9 41
[2] 聂志勇, 吴弼东, 郭磊 2016 国际药学研究杂志 43 114
Nie Z Y, Wu B D, Guo L 2016 J. Int. Pharm. Res. 43 114
[3] Kim J, Cote L J, Kim F 2010 JACS 132 8180
Google Scholar
[4] Niu Z Q, Liu L L, Zhang L 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 3681
Google Scholar
[5] Shanmugasundaram A, Ramireddy B, Basak P 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 6909
Google Scholar
[6] Yuan W J, Liu A R, Huang L 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 766
Google Scholar
[7] Shimizu T, Huang D Y, Yan F 2015 Chem. Rev. 115 6491
Google Scholar
[8] Choi S Y, Kim Y, Chung H S 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 3817
Google Scholar
[9] Baek J, Yin D, Liu N 2017 Nano Res. 10 1861
Google Scholar
[10] Ou J Z, Ge W Y, Carey B 2015 ACS Nano 9 10313
Google Scholar
[11] Late D J, Kanawade R V, Kannan P K 2016 Sens. Lett. 14 1249
Google Scholar
[12] Guo H Y, Lan C Y, Zhou Z F 2017 Nanoscale 9 6246
Google Scholar
[13] Li X G, Li X X, Li Z 2017 Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 240 273
Google Scholar
[14] Abbasi A, Sardroodi J J 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 436 27
Google Scholar
[15] Huang Y X, Guo J H, Kang Y J 2015 Nanoscale 7 19358
Google Scholar
[16] Cui S M, Wen Z H, Huang X K 2015 Small 11 2305
Google Scholar
[17] Late D J, Huang Y K, Liu B 2013 ACS Nano 7 4879
Google Scholar
[18] Liu Y J, Hao L Z, Gao W 2015 Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 211 537
Google Scholar
[19] Lee K, Gatensby R, Mcevoy N 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 6699
Google Scholar
[20] Huang H, Feng X, Du C C 2015 Chem. Commun. 51 7903
Google Scholar
[21] Si C D, Wu Y H, Sun Y F 2019 Electrochim. Acta 309 116
Google Scholar
[22] Zhang R F, Du Y B, Han G L 2019 J. Mater. Sci. 54 552
Google Scholar
[23] Zhao G, Li M 2018 Appl. Phys. A-Mater. 124 751
Google Scholar
[24] Koklioti M A, Bittencourt C, Noirfalise X 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1 3625
-
图 1 (a) 单层MoS2和 (b) V掺杂单层MoS2的能带结构; (c) 单层MoS2和 (d) V掺杂单层MoS2的Bader电荷
Figure 1. Band structure of (a) MoS2 and (b) V-MoS2; Bader charge of (c) MoS2 and (d) V-MoS2.
图 2 四种探针分子在V掺杂前后5 × 5 × 1 MoS2 (0001)表面最稳定吸附构型的俯视图和侧视图
Figure 2. Top and side views of the most stable adsorption configurations of the four probe molecules on the 5 × 5 × 1 MoS2 (0001) surface before and after V doping.
图 3 V掺杂前后少层二维MoS2气敏元件对 (a)体积分数为20 × 10–6的NO2和NH3及(b) 1 mg/m3沙林和芥子气的灵敏度与V掺杂前后材料的Bader电荷之间的关系
Figure 3. Relationship between sensitivity of MoS2 gas sensor to (a) NO2 and NH3 of 20 × 10–6 volum percent, (b) 1 mg/m3 of sarin and mustard gas and Bader charge before and after V doping.
表 1 四种探针分子在V掺杂前后二维MoS2表面的吸附能、吸附距离和Bader电荷
Table 1. Adsorption energy, adsorption distance, and Bader charge of four probe molecules on the surface of MoS2 before and after V doping.
吸附构型 吸附
能/eV吸附距
离/ÅBader电
荷ΔQ/eNH3-MoS2(0001) 5 × 5 × 1 –0.128 3.19 0.03 NO2-MoS2(0001) 5 × 5 × 1 –0.193 2.94 –0.08 Mustard gas-MoS2(0001)
5 × 5 × 1–0.535 2.86 –0.06 Sarin-MoS2(0001) 5 × 5 × 1 –0.420 2.82 –0.03 NH3-V-MoS2(0001) 5 × 5 × 1 –1.597 2.20 0.11 NO2-V-MoS2(0001) 5 × 5 × 1 –3.639 1.99 –0.57 Mustard gas-V-MoS2(0001)
5 × 5 × 1–1.641 2.45 –0.10 Sarin-V-MoS2(0001) 5 × 5 × 1 –2.198 2.10 –0.06 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] 郑祖庆 1995 交通与港航 9 41
Zheng Z Q 1995 Public Util. 9 41
[2] 聂志勇, 吴弼东, 郭磊 2016 国际药学研究杂志 43 114
Nie Z Y, Wu B D, Guo L 2016 J. Int. Pharm. Res. 43 114
[3] Kim J, Cote L J, Kim F 2010 JACS 132 8180
Google Scholar
[4] Niu Z Q, Liu L L, Zhang L 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 3681
Google Scholar
[5] Shanmugasundaram A, Ramireddy B, Basak P 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 6909
Google Scholar
[6] Yuan W J, Liu A R, Huang L 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 766
Google Scholar
[7] Shimizu T, Huang D Y, Yan F 2015 Chem. Rev. 115 6491
Google Scholar
[8] Choi S Y, Kim Y, Chung H S 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 3817
Google Scholar
[9] Baek J, Yin D, Liu N 2017 Nano Res. 10 1861
Google Scholar
[10] Ou J Z, Ge W Y, Carey B 2015 ACS Nano 9 10313
Google Scholar
[11] Late D J, Kanawade R V, Kannan P K 2016 Sens. Lett. 14 1249
Google Scholar
[12] Guo H Y, Lan C Y, Zhou Z F 2017 Nanoscale 9 6246
Google Scholar
[13] Li X G, Li X X, Li Z 2017 Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 240 273
Google Scholar
[14] Abbasi A, Sardroodi J J 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 436 27
Google Scholar
[15] Huang Y X, Guo J H, Kang Y J 2015 Nanoscale 7 19358
Google Scholar
[16] Cui S M, Wen Z H, Huang X K 2015 Small 11 2305
Google Scholar
[17] Late D J, Huang Y K, Liu B 2013 ACS Nano 7 4879
Google Scholar
[18] Liu Y J, Hao L Z, Gao W 2015 Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 211 537
Google Scholar
[19] Lee K, Gatensby R, Mcevoy N 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 6699
Google Scholar
[20] Huang H, Feng X, Du C C 2015 Chem. Commun. 51 7903
Google Scholar
[21] Si C D, Wu Y H, Sun Y F 2019 Electrochim. Acta 309 116
Google Scholar
[22] Zhang R F, Du Y B, Han G L 2019 J. Mater. Sci. 54 552
Google Scholar
[23] Zhao G, Li M 2018 Appl. Phys. A-Mater. 124 751
Google Scholar
[24] Koklioti M A, Bittencourt C, Noirfalise X 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1 3625
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 7845
- PDF Downloads: 236
- Cited By: 0
