Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Perovskite-based two-dimensional ferromagnet Sr2RuO4 monolayer

Zhang Jun-Ting Ji Ke Xie Yu Li Chao

Citation:

Perovskite-based two-dimensional ferromagnet Sr2RuO4 monolayer

Zhang Jun-Ting, Ji Ke, Xie Yu, Li Chao
cstr: 32037.14.aps.73.20241042
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • At present, the research on two-dimensional (2D) ferromagnets is mainly concentrated on van der Waals materials, while the successful preparation of strain-free freestanding 2D perovskite films provides a great opportunity for designing 2D ferromagnets beyond van der Waals materials. Perovskite oxide SrRuO3, a typical perovskite itinerant ferromagnet, has broad application prospects in many fields. In this work, the lattice dynamics, ground-state structure, electronic and magnetic properties of its perovskite monolayer with formula Sr2RuO4, as well as the effect of external electric field, are studied by combining first-principles calculation, symmetry analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. The influence of the Hubbard parameter U is also revealed. The results indicate that the ground-state structure under all U values presents the structural phase (space group P4/mbm) generated by octahedral rotation distortion. Similar to the SrRuO3 bulk, Sr2RuO4 has a monolayer ground-state phase that exhibits ferromagnetism, which is independent of the U value and thus robust. Density functional theory calculation using Hubbard parameter U predicts the ground-state phase of the monolayer to be a ferromagnetic half metal with an out-of-plane easy-magnetization axis, while excluding that the U parameter predicts the ground-state phase to be a ferromagnetic metallic state. The ferromagnetism mainly originates from the strong ferromagnetic exchange interaction between the nearest neighbor spin pairs. The simulated Curie temperature of the Sr2RuO4 monolayer is 177 K, which is close to the value (150 K) of its bulk phase. The out-of-plane electric field does not change the ground-state structure nor ferromagnetism of the Sr2RuO4 monolayer, but can significantly modulate its electronic property and magnetic property. When an external electric field exceeding 0.3 V/Å is applied, the system undergoes a transition from a ferromagnetic half-metal state to a ferromagnetic metallic state. This work indicates the potential application of Sr2RuO4 monolayer in low-dimensional spintrnic devices, and provides a reference for developing perovskite-based 2D ferromagnets and realizing the control of 2D magnetism by electric field.
      Corresponding author: Zhang Jun-Ting, juntingzhang@cumt.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12374097, 11974418).
    [1]

    Burch K S, Mandrus D, Park J G 2018 Nature 563 47Google Scholar

    [2]

    Gong C, Zhang X 2019 Science 363 706Google Scholar

    [3]

    肖寒, 弭孟娟, 王以林 2021 物理学报 70 127503Google Scholar

    Xiao H, Mi M J, Wang Y L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 127503Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gong C, Li L, Li Z, Ji H, Stern A, Xia Y, Cao T, Bao W, Wang C, Wang Y, Qiu Z Q, Cava R J, Louie S G, Xia J, Zhang X 2017 Nature 546 265Google Scholar

    [5]

    Huang B, Clark G, Navarro-Moratalla E, Klein D R, Cheng R, Seyler K L, Zhong D, Schmidgall E, McGuire M A, Cobden D H, Yao W, Xiao D, Jarillo-Herrero P, Xu X 2017 Nature 546 270Google Scholar

    [6]

    Song T C, Cai X H, Tu M W Y, Zhang X, Huang B, Wilson N P, Seyler K L, Zhu L, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, McGuire M A, Cobden D H, Xiao D, Yao W, Xu X D 2018 Science 360 1214Google Scholar

    [7]

    Klein D R, MacNeill D, Lado J L, Soriano D, Navarro-Moratalla E, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Manni S, Canfield P, Fernández-Rossier J, Jarillo-Herrero P 2018 Science 360 1218Google Scholar

    [8]

    Kim H H, Yang B, Patel T, Sfigakis F, Li C, Tian S, Lei H, Tsen A W 2018 Nano Lett. 18 4885Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang Z, Zhang T Y, Ding M, et al. 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 554Google Scholar

    [10]

    Jiang X, Liu Q X, Xing J P, Liu N S, Guo Y, Liu Z F, Zhao J J 2021 Appl. Phys. Rev. 8 031305Google Scholar

    [11]

    Dagotto E, Hotta T, Moreo A 2001 Phys. Rep. 344 1Google Scholar

    [12]

    Dagotto E 2005 Science 309 257Google Scholar

    [13]

    Eerenstein W, Mathur N D, Scott J F 2006 Nature 442 759Google Scholar

    [14]

    Hong S S, Yu J H, Lu D, Marshall A F, Hikita Y, Cui Y, Hwang H Y 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 eaao5173Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ji D X, Cai S H, Paudel T R, Sun H Y, Zhang C C, Han L, Wei Y F, Zang Y P, Gu M, Zhang Y, Gao W P, Huyan H X, Guo W, Wu D, Gu Z B, Tsymbal E Y, Wang P, Nie Y F, Pan X Q 2019 Nature 570 87Google Scholar

    [16]

    Lu J, Luo W, Feng J, Xiang H 2018 Nano Lett. 18 595Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhang J T, Shen X F, Wang Y C, Ji C, Zhou Y, Wang J L, Huang F Z, Lu X M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 017601Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhang J T, Zhou Y, Wang F, Shen X F, Wang J L, Lu X M 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 117603Google Scholar

    [19]

    Zhou Y, Dong S, Shan C X, Ji K, Zhang J T 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 075408Google Scholar

    [20]

    Shen X F, Wang F, Lu X M, Zhang J T 2023 Nano Lett. 23 735Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ji K, Wu Z, Shen X, Wang J, Zhang J 2023 Phys. Rev. B 107 134431Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gertjan K, Lior K, Wolter S, Guus R, Steven D J, Chang-Beom E, A B D H, R B M 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 253Google Scholar

    [23]

    Anwar M S, Lee S R, Ishiguro R, Sugimoto Y, Tano Y, Kang S J, Shin Y J, Yonezawa S, Manske D, Takayanagi H, Noh T W, Maeno Y 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13220Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li W, Liao L, Deng C G, Lebudi C, Liu J C, Wang S X, Yi D, Wang L F, Li J F, Li Q 2024 Nano Lett. 24 5010Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ohnishi T, Takada K 2011 Appl. Phys. Express 4 025501Google Scholar

    [26]

    Wakabayashi Y K, Kaneta-Takada S, Krockenberger Y, Taniyasu Y, Yamamoto H 2021 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3 2712Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 558(RGoogle Scholar

    [28]

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar

    [29]

    Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Constantin L A, Zhou X, Burke K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 039902Google Scholar

    [30]

    Şaşıoğlu E, Friedrich C, Blügel S 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 121101Google Scholar

    [31]

    Dudarev S L, Botton G A, Savrasov S Y, Humphreys C J, Sutton A P 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 1505Google Scholar

    [32]

    Kulik H J, Cococcioni M, Scherlis D A, Marzari N 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 103001Google Scholar

    [33]

    Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar

    [34]

    Campbell B J, Stokes H T, Tanner D E, Hatch D M 2006 J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39 607Google Scholar

    [35]

    Gonze X, Lee C 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 10355Google Scholar

    [36]

    Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1Google Scholar

    [37]

    Marshall A F, Klein L, Dodge J S, Ahn C H, Reiner J W, Mieville L, Antagonazza L, Kapitulnik A, Geballe T H, Beasley M R 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 85 4131Google Scholar

    [38]

    Wang F, Zhou Y, Shen X F, Dong S, Zhang J T 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 20 064011Google Scholar

  • 图 1  Sr2RuO4单层原型相的(a)晶体结构和(b)声子谱

    Figure 1.  (a) Schematic crystal structure and (b) phonon spectrum of the prototype phase of Sr2RuO4 monolayer.

    图 2  Sr2RuO4单层每种晶格畸变模式的能量随模式幅度的变化, 涉及(a) 旋转(R)和倾斜(T), 以及(b) JT1和JT2扭曲模式. 插图为四种晶格扭曲模式的示意图, 其中弯曲的箭头代表八面体转动方向, 而直箭头表示阴离子位移方向

    Figure 2.  Energy variation of each distortion mode with the mode amplitude for the Sr2RuO4 monolayer, involves (a) rotation (R) and tilt (T), and (b) JT1 and JT2 modes. The illustration shows four lattice distortion modes, where the curved arrows represent the direction of octahedral rotation and the straight arrows indicate the direction of anion displacement

    图 3  Sr2RuO4单层基态相的(a) 晶体结构, (b) 声子谱, (c) 300 K 下的第一性分子动力学模拟

    Figure 3.  Crystal structure (a), phonon spectrum (b), and first-principles molecular dynamics simulation (at 300 K) (c) of the ground-state phase of Sr2RuO4 monolayer.

    图 4  Sr2RuO4单层基态相在不同U值下的上自旋和下自旋投影能带结构 (a) $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 1.2 $ eV; (b) $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 2 $ eV; (c) $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 0 $ eV

    Figure 4.  Projected up and down spin band structures of the ground-state phase of Sr2RuO4 monolayer at different U values: (a) $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 1.2 $ eV; (b) $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 2 $ eV; (c) $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 0 $ eV.

    图 5  (a) 不同反铁磁序的示意图和相对能量(相对于铁磁相), 以及$ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 1.2 $ eV 时计算的(b)不同自旋面的磁各向异性能量曲线和 (c) 蒙特卡罗模拟的磁化和比热曲线

    Figure 5.  (a) Schematic of different antiferromagnetic orders and their relative energy (to ferromagnetic order) for the ground-state phase. (b) Energy curves of magnetic anisotropy for different spin planes, and (c) magnetization and specific heat curves in Monte Carlo simulation calculated at $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 1.2 $ eV.

    图 6  (a)上自旋带隙和磁矩及(b)磁交换相互作用、磁各向异性常数、居里温度随电场强度的变化

    Figure 6.  (a) Variation of the up-spin band gap and magnetic moment, and (b) magnetic exchange interaction, magnetic anisotropy constant and Curie temperature with the electric-field intensity.

    表 1  Sr2RuO4单层不同晶格畸变模式及其各种组合所产生的结构相的对称性和不同U值下的相对能量, 其中基态相的能量被设置为0. 符号“—”表示对应的结构相不稳定, 即经过结构优化后转变为其他结构相

    Table 1.  Symmetry and the relative energy at different U values of structural phases resulting from different distortion modes and their various combinations for the Sr2RuO4 monolayer. Energy of the ground-state phase is set to 0. The symbol “—” represents that the corresponding structural phase is unstable, that is, it is transformed into another structural phases after structural optimization.

    Distortion modes Space group $ \Delta E $/(meV·f.u.–1)
    $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 0 $ $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 0.5 $ $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 1.2 $ $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 1.5 $ $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} = 2 $
    $ {\mathrm{Para}} $ $ P4/mmm $ 154 172 225 227 214
    ${\mathrm{ R}}(M_2^+) $ $ P4/mbm $ 0 0 0 0 0
    $ {\mathrm{T}}(a, 0)(M_5^+) $ $ Pmna $ 228 225 214
    $ {\mathrm{T}}(a, a)(M_5^+) $ $ Cmma $ 227 224 212
    $ {\mathrm{JT}}_1(M_3^+) $ $ P4/mbm $
    $ {\mathrm{JT}}_2(M_4^+) $ $ P4/mmm $
    $ {\mathrm{R}} \oplus {\mathrm{JT}}_1 $ $ Pbam $
    $ {\mathrm{R}} \oplus {\mathrm{JT_2}} $ $ P4/m $
    $ {\mathrm{R}} \oplus {\mathrm{T}}(a, 0) $ $ P2_1/c $
    $ {\mathrm{R}} \oplus {\mathrm{T}}(a, a) $ $ C2/m $
    $ {\mathrm{T}}(a, 0) \oplus {\mathrm{JT}}_1 $ $ P2_1/c $
    $ {\mathrm{T}}(a, 0) \oplus {\mathrm{JT_2}} $ $ P2/m $
    $ {\mathrm{T}}(a, a) \oplus{\mathrm{ JT}}_1 $ $ C2/m $
    $ {\mathrm{T}}(a, a) \oplus {\mathrm{JT}}_2 $ $ C2/m $
    $ {\mathrm{R}} \oplus {\mathrm{T}}(a, 0) \oplus {\mathrm{JT}}_1 $ $ P2_1/c $
    ${\mathrm{ R}} \oplus {\mathrm{T}}(a, 0) \oplus {\mathrm{JT}}_2 $ $ P\bar{1} $
    $ {\mathrm{R}} \oplus{\mathrm{ T}}(a, a) \oplus {\mathrm{JT}}_1 $ $ P\bar{1} $
    $ {\mathrm{R}} \oplus {\mathrm{T}}(a, a) \oplus {\mathrm{JT}}_2 $ $ P\bar{1} $
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 2  不同U值下计算的最近邻($ J_1 $)和次近邻($ J_2 $)磁交换作用参量, 磁各向异性常数(K), 磁矩(M)及居里温度($ T_{\mathrm{C }}$)

    Table 2.  Nearest neighbor ($ J_1 $) and next nearest neighbor ($ J_2 $) magnetic exchange interaction parameters, magnetic anisotropy constant (K), magnetic moment (M) and Curie temperature ($ T_{\mathrm{C}} $) calculated at different U values.

    $ U_{{\mathrm{eff}}} $/eV $ J_1 $/meV $ J_2 $/meV K/meV M/$ \mu_{\mathrm{B}} $ $ T_{\mathrm{C}} $/K
    0 11.48 –1.35 1.57 0.73 81
    0.5 15.39 1.73 1.11 0.96 111
    1.2 25.34 –2.41 1.83 1.43 177
    1.5 31.18 –3.90 1.70 1.44 195
    2 38.38 –8.53 1.81 1.47 202
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1]

    Burch K S, Mandrus D, Park J G 2018 Nature 563 47Google Scholar

    [2]

    Gong C, Zhang X 2019 Science 363 706Google Scholar

    [3]

    肖寒, 弭孟娟, 王以林 2021 物理学报 70 127503Google Scholar

    Xiao H, Mi M J, Wang Y L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 127503Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gong C, Li L, Li Z, Ji H, Stern A, Xia Y, Cao T, Bao W, Wang C, Wang Y, Qiu Z Q, Cava R J, Louie S G, Xia J, Zhang X 2017 Nature 546 265Google Scholar

    [5]

    Huang B, Clark G, Navarro-Moratalla E, Klein D R, Cheng R, Seyler K L, Zhong D, Schmidgall E, McGuire M A, Cobden D H, Yao W, Xiao D, Jarillo-Herrero P, Xu X 2017 Nature 546 270Google Scholar

    [6]

    Song T C, Cai X H, Tu M W Y, Zhang X, Huang B, Wilson N P, Seyler K L, Zhu L, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, McGuire M A, Cobden D H, Xiao D, Yao W, Xu X D 2018 Science 360 1214Google Scholar

    [7]

    Klein D R, MacNeill D, Lado J L, Soriano D, Navarro-Moratalla E, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Manni S, Canfield P, Fernández-Rossier J, Jarillo-Herrero P 2018 Science 360 1218Google Scholar

    [8]

    Kim H H, Yang B, Patel T, Sfigakis F, Li C, Tian S, Lei H, Tsen A W 2018 Nano Lett. 18 4885Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang Z, Zhang T Y, Ding M, et al. 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 554Google Scholar

    [10]

    Jiang X, Liu Q X, Xing J P, Liu N S, Guo Y, Liu Z F, Zhao J J 2021 Appl. Phys. Rev. 8 031305Google Scholar

    [11]

    Dagotto E, Hotta T, Moreo A 2001 Phys. Rep. 344 1Google Scholar

    [12]

    Dagotto E 2005 Science 309 257Google Scholar

    [13]

    Eerenstein W, Mathur N D, Scott J F 2006 Nature 442 759Google Scholar

    [14]

    Hong S S, Yu J H, Lu D, Marshall A F, Hikita Y, Cui Y, Hwang H Y 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 eaao5173Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ji D X, Cai S H, Paudel T R, Sun H Y, Zhang C C, Han L, Wei Y F, Zang Y P, Gu M, Zhang Y, Gao W P, Huyan H X, Guo W, Wu D, Gu Z B, Tsymbal E Y, Wang P, Nie Y F, Pan X Q 2019 Nature 570 87Google Scholar

    [16]

    Lu J, Luo W, Feng J, Xiang H 2018 Nano Lett. 18 595Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhang J T, Shen X F, Wang Y C, Ji C, Zhou Y, Wang J L, Huang F Z, Lu X M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 017601Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhang J T, Zhou Y, Wang F, Shen X F, Wang J L, Lu X M 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 117603Google Scholar

    [19]

    Zhou Y, Dong S, Shan C X, Ji K, Zhang J T 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 075408Google Scholar

    [20]

    Shen X F, Wang F, Lu X M, Zhang J T 2023 Nano Lett. 23 735Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ji K, Wu Z, Shen X, Wang J, Zhang J 2023 Phys. Rev. B 107 134431Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gertjan K, Lior K, Wolter S, Guus R, Steven D J, Chang-Beom E, A B D H, R B M 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 253Google Scholar

    [23]

    Anwar M S, Lee S R, Ishiguro R, Sugimoto Y, Tano Y, Kang S J, Shin Y J, Yonezawa S, Manske D, Takayanagi H, Noh T W, Maeno Y 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13220Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li W, Liao L, Deng C G, Lebudi C, Liu J C, Wang S X, Yi D, Wang L F, Li J F, Li Q 2024 Nano Lett. 24 5010Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ohnishi T, Takada K 2011 Appl. Phys. Express 4 025501Google Scholar

    [26]

    Wakabayashi Y K, Kaneta-Takada S, Krockenberger Y, Taniyasu Y, Yamamoto H 2021 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3 2712Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 558(RGoogle Scholar

    [28]

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar

    [29]

    Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Constantin L A, Zhou X, Burke K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 039902Google Scholar

    [30]

    Şaşıoğlu E, Friedrich C, Blügel S 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 121101Google Scholar

    [31]

    Dudarev S L, Botton G A, Savrasov S Y, Humphreys C J, Sutton A P 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 1505Google Scholar

    [32]

    Kulik H J, Cococcioni M, Scherlis D A, Marzari N 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 103001Google Scholar

    [33]

    Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar

    [34]

    Campbell B J, Stokes H T, Tanner D E, Hatch D M 2006 J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39 607Google Scholar

    [35]

    Gonze X, Lee C 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 10355Google Scholar

    [36]

    Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1Google Scholar

    [37]

    Marshall A F, Klein L, Dodge J S, Ahn C H, Reiner J W, Mieville L, Antagonazza L, Kapitulnik A, Geballe T H, Beasley M R 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 85 4131Google Scholar

    [38]

    Wang F, Zhou Y, Shen X F, Dong S, Zhang J T 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 20 064011Google Scholar

  • [1] Zhang Jun-Ting, Wu Zong-Shuo, Shen Xiao-Fan. Two-dimensional ferromagnetism induced by Jahn-Teller distortion and orbital order. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(1): 017101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231252
    [2] Gong Ling-Yun, Zhang Ping, Chen qian, Lou Zhi-Hao, Xu Jie, Gao Feng. First principles study of structure and property of Nb5+-doped SrTiO3. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(22): 227101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211241
    [3] Li Jia-Sen, Liang Chun-Jun, Ji Chao, Gong Hong-Kang, Song Qi, Zhang Hui-Min, Liu Ning. Improvement in performance of carbon-based perovskite solar cells by adding 1, 8-diiodooctane into hole transport layer 3-hexylthiophene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(19): 198403. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210586
    [4] Li Xue, Cao Bao-Long, Wang Ming-Hao, Feng Zeng-Qin, Chen Shu-Fen. Perovskite light-emitting diode based on combination of modified hole-injection layer and polymer composite emission layer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(4): 048502. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201379
    [5] Hou Lu, Tong Xin, Ouyang Gang. First-principles study of atomic bond nature of one-dimensional carbyne chain under different strains. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(24): 246802. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201231
    [6] Wu Hai-Yan, Tang Jian-Xin, Li Yan-Qing. Efficient and stable blue perovskite light emitting diodes based on defect passivation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(13): 138502. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200566
    [7] Chen Jia-Mei, Su Hang, Li Wan, Zhang Li-Lai, Suo Xin-Lei, Qin Jing, Zhu Kun, Li Guo-Long. Research progress of enhancing perovskite light emitting diodes with light extraction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(21): 218501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200755
    [8] Fu Peng-Fei, Yu Dan-Ni, Peng Zi-Jian, Gong Jin-Kang, Ning Zhi-Jun. Perovskite solar cells passivated by distorted two-dimensional structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(15): 158802. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190306
    [9] Huang Wei, Li Yue-Long, Ren Hui-Zhi, Wang Peng-Yang, Wei Chang-Chun, Hou Guo-Fu, Zhang De-Kun, Xu Sheng-Zhi, Wang Guang-Cai, Zhao Ying, Yuan Ming-Jian, Zhang Xiao-Dan. Perovskite light-emitting diodes based on n-type nanocrystalline silicon oxide electron injection layer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(12): 128103. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190258
    [10] Qu Zi-Han, Chu Ze-Ma, Zhang Xing-Wang, You Jing-Bi. Research progress of efficient green perovskite light emitting diodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(15): 158504. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190647
    [11] Zhao Run, Yang Hao. Oxygen vacancies induced tuning effect on physical properties of multiferroic perovskite oxide thin films. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(15): 156101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181028
    [12] Pan Feng-Chun, Xu Jia-Nan, Yang Hua, Lin Xue-Ling, Chen Huan-Ming. Ferromagnetism of undoped anatase TiO2 based on the first-principles calculations. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(5): 056101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.056101
    [13] Li Cong, Zheng You-Jin, Fu Si-Nian, Jiang Hong-Wei, Wang Dan. First-principle study of the magnetism and photocatalyticactivity of RE(La/Ce/Pr/Nd) doping anatase TiO2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(3): 037102. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.037102
    [14] Ye Hong-Jun, Wang Da-Wei, Jiang Zhi-Jun, Cheng Sheng, Wei Xiao-Yong. Ferroelectric phase transition of perovskite SnTiO3 based on the first principles. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(23): 237101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.237101
    [15] Hou Qing-Yu, Zhao Chun-Wang. A first-principle study of the effect of W-doping on physical properties of anatase TiO2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(24): 247201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.247201
    [16] Tan Xing-Yi, Wang Jia-Heng, Zhu Yi-Yi, Zuo An-You, Jin Ke-Xin. First-principles calculations of phosphorene doped with carbon, oxygen and sulfur. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(20): 207301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.207301
    [17] Lu Jin-Lian, Cao Jue-Xian. A first-principles study of capacity and mechanism of a single titanium atom storing hydrogen. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(14): 148801. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.148801
    [18] Shi Li-Bin, Xiao Zhen-Lin. Origin of ferromagnetic properties in Ni doped ZnO by the first principles study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(2): 027502. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.027502
    [19] Lin Zhu, Guo Zhi-You, Bi Yan-Jun, Dong Yu-Cheng. Ferromagnetism and the optical properties of Cu-doped AlN from first-principles study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(3): 1917-1923. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1917
    [20] Peng Li-Ping, Xu Ling, Yin Jian-Wu. First-principles study the optical properties of anatase TiO2 by N-doping. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1585-1589. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1585
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  599
  • PDF Downloads:  37
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  27 July 2024
  • Accepted Date:  27 September 2024
  • Available Online:  24 October 2024
  • Published Online:  20 November 2024

/

返回文章
返回