-
In an electronic double-layer system composed of two spatially adjacent yet electrically insulated conductors, when a current flows through one conductor (drive layer), its charge carriers transfer energy/momentum to those in the other conductor (drag layer) via interlayer Coulomb coupling. This generates a measurable voltage or current in the drag layer, a phenomenon known as interlayer drag effect. This effect serves as a critical approach for studying quasiparticle interactions and investigating interlayer-correlated quantum states. Two-dimensional layered materials with highly tunable properties provide new opportunities for exploring the drag effect. In this study, we fabricate an electronic double-layer structure consisting of graphene and NbSe2 to systematically investigate the drag effect between a two-dimensional semimetal and a two-dimensional superconductor, wherein a thin hBN layer serves as the insulating spacer. When graphene acts as the drive layer and NbSe2 acts as the drag layer, a pronounced positive drag response is observed within the superconducting transition temperature range of NbSe2. In contrast, the drag signal vanishes when NbSe2 is in its normal metallic state. Magnetic field dependence measurements reveal that the drag response disappears under high fields where the superconductivity of NbSe2 is suppressed, further confirming its direct correlation with the superconducting transition. Gate-voltage modulation experiments reveal that the drag response peaks when tuning the Fermi level of graphene across the Dirac point. This is attributed to the reduced screening of interlayer interactions due to the ultra-low carrier concentration at this point. Notably, the sign of the supercurrent drag does not depend on the carrier type in graphene, ruling out the conventional momentum-transfer drag mechanism. Our results collectively demonstrate the realization of supercurrent drag effect, which has been attributed to Coulomb coupling between the quantum fluctuations of the superconducting phases in a superconductor and the charge densities in a normal conductor in previous study. Notably, comparative studies across devices show that supercurrent drag responses occur only in thin NbSe2 layers cleaved in air. No significant signals are detected in either thick NbSe2 layers or thin layers cleaved under argon protection. These results establish the importance of superconducting inhomogeneity in NbSe2 for generating supercurrent drag effect, suggesting that drag measurements could also serve as a novel probe for investigating superconducting properties. Further investigation into the polarity and intensity of supercurrent drag signals may advance our understanding of inhomogeneous superconductivity, as well as interactions between normal carriers and Cooper pairs.
-
Keywords:
- two-dimensional materials /
- supercurrent drag effect /
- superconducting inhomogeneity /
- quantum fluctuations
-
[1] Narozhny B N, Levchenko A 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 025003
[2] Laroche D, Gervais G, Lilly M P, Reno J L 2014 Science 343 631
[3] Yamamoto M, Stopa M, Tokura Y, Hirayama Y, Tarucha S 2006 Science 313 204
[4] Eisenstein J P, MacDonald A H 2004 Nature 432 691
[5] Tutuc E, Shayegan M, Huse D A 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 036802
[6] Su J J, MacDonald A H 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 799
[7] Liu X, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Halperin B I, Kim P 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 746
[8] Li J I A, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Hone J, Dean C R 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 751
[9] Giaever I 1966 Phys. Rev. Lett. 16 460
[10] Duan J M, Yip S 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 3647
[11] Shimshoni E 1995 Phys. Rev. B 51 9415
[12] Huang X, Bazàn G, Bernstein G H 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 4051
[13] Giordano N, Monnier J D 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 9363
[14] Kim S, Jo I, Nah J, Yao Z, Banerjee S K, Tutuc E 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 161401
[15] Gorbachev R V, Geim A K, Katsnelson M I, Novoselov K S, Tudorovskiy T, Grigorieva I V, MacDonald A H, Morozov S V, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Ponomarenko L A 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 896
[16] Tao R, Li L, Xie H Y, Fan X, Guo L, Zhu L, Yan Y, Zhang Z, Zeng C 2023 Nat. Phys. 19 372
[17] Xi X, Wang Z, Zhao W, Park J H, Law K T, Berger H, Forró L, Shan J, Mak K F 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 139
[18] Khestanova E, Birkbeck J, Zhu M, Cao Y, Yu G L, Ghazaryan D, Yin J, Berger H, Forró L, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Gorbachev R V, Mishchenko A, Geim A K, Grigorieva I V 2018 Nano Lett. 18 2623
[19] Onishi S, Ugeda M M, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Ojeda-Aristizabal C, Ryu H, Mo S K, Hussain Z, Shen Z X, Crommie M F, Zettl A 2016 Phys. Status Solidi B 253 2396
[20] El-Bana M S, Wolverson D, Russo S, Balakrishnan G, Paul D M, Bending S J 2013 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26 125020
[21] Cao Y, Mishchenko A, Yu G L, Khestanova E, Rooney A P, Prestat E, Kretinin A V, Blake P, Shalom M B, Woods C, Chapman J, Balakrishnan G, Grigorieva I V, Novoselov K S, Piot B A, Potemski M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Haigh S J, Geim A K, Gorbachev R V 2015 Nano Lett. 15 4914
[22] Myers G E, Montet G L 1971 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 32 2645
[23] Chen Z, Swartz A G, Yoon H, Inoue H, Merz T A, Lu D, Xie Y, Yuan H, Hikita Y, Raghu S, Hwang H Y 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4008
[24] Bert J A, Kalisky B, Bell C, Kim M, Hikita Y, Hwang H Y, Moler K A 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 767
Metrics
- Abstract views: 69
- PDF Downloads: 1
- Cited By: 0
下载:
