搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

氙气中辐射激波的发光特性

赵多 李守先 安建祝 吴勇 吴泽清 李琼 王芳 孟广为

引用本文:
Citation:

氙气中辐射激波的发光特性

赵多, 李守先, 安建祝, 吴勇, 吴泽清, 李琼, 王芳, 孟广为

Radiation properties of radiative shock in xenon

Zhao Duo, Li Shou-Xian, An Jian-Zhu, Wu Yong, Wu Ze-Qing, Li Qiong, Wang Fang, Meng Guang-Wei
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 本文模拟研究了氙气中X射线加热产生辐射激波的发光特性. 辐射激波采用Zinn模型计算, 并在模型中输入氙气的辐射不透明度和状态方程参数. 研究发现, 辐射激波伴随着丰富的光学演化过程, 激波对外辐射强度表现出两个明显的亮度峰值和一个亮度极小值, 辐射光谱也经常偏离黑体辐射光谱. 对氙气不同位置光学特性的分析可知, 激波和内部高温区的辐射吸收系数的动态演化导致了辐射激波的发光位置和辐射强度的变化.
    Radiative shock is an important phenomenon both in astrophysics and in inertial confinement fusion. In this paper, the radiation properties of X-ray heated radiatve shock in xenon is studied with the simulation method. The radiative shock is described by a one-dimensional, multi-group radiation hydrodynamics model proposed by Zinn [Zinn J 1973 J. Comput. Phys. 13 569]. To conduct computation, the opacity and equation-of-state data of xenon are calculated and put into the model. The reliabilities of the model and the physical parameters of xenon are verified by comparing the temperature and velocity of the radiative shock calculated by the model with those measured experimentally. The evolution of the radiative shock involves abundant physical processes. The core of the xenon can be heated up to 100 eV, resulting in a thermal wave and forming an expanding high-temperature-core. Shortly, the hydrodynamic disturbances reach the thermal wave front, generating a shock. As the thermal wave slows down, the shock gradually exceeds the high-temperature-core, forming a double-step distribution in the temperature profile. The time evolution of the effective temperature of the radiative shock shows two maximum values and one minimum value, and the radiation spectra often deviate from blackbody spectrum. By analyzing the radiation and absorption properties at different positions of the shock, it can be found that the optical property of the shock is highly dynamic and can generate the above-mentioned radiation characteristics. When the radiative shock is just formed, the radiation comes from the shock surface and the shock precursor has a significant absorption of the radiation. As the shock temperature falls during expansion, the shock precursor disappears and the radiation inside the shock can come out owing to absorption coefficient decreases. When the shock becomes transparent, the radiation surface reaches the outside edge of the high-temperature-core. Then, the temperature of the high-temperature-core decreases further, making this region also optically thin, and the radiation from the inner region can come out. Finally, the radiation strength falls because of temperature decreasing.
      通信作者: 安建祝, An_jianzhu@iapcm.ac.cn
      Corresponding author: An Jian-Zhu, An_jianzhu@iapcm.ac.cn
    [1]

    Ensman L, Burrows A 1992 Astrophys. J. 393 742Google Scholar

    [2]

    DE Young D S 1991 Science 252 389Google Scholar

    [3]

    Chakrabarti S K, Titarchuk L G 1995 Astrophys. J. 455 623Google Scholar

    [4]

    Pak A, Divol L, Gregori G, Weber S, Atherton J, Bennedetti R, Bradley D K, Callahan D, Casey D T, Dewald E, Döppner T, Edwards M J, Frenje J A, Glenn S, Grim G P, Hicks D, Hsing W W, Izumi N, Jones O S, Johnson M G, Khan S F, Kilkenny J D, Kline J L, Kyrala G A, Lindl J, Landen O L, Le Pape S, Ma T, MacPhee A, MacGowan B J, MacKinnon A J, Masse L, Meezan N B, Moody J D, Olson R E, Ralph J E, Robey H F, Park H S, Remington B A, Ross J S, Tommasini R, Town R P J, Smalyuk V, Glenzer S H, Moses E I 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 056315Google Scholar

    [5]

    江少恩, 李文洪, 孙可煦, 蒋小华, 刘永刚, 崔延莉, 陈久森, 丁永坤, 郑志坚 2004 物理学报 53 3424

    Jiang S E, Li W H, Sun K X, Jiang X H, Liu Y G, Gui Y L, Chen J S, Ding Y K, Zheng Z J 2004 Acta Phys. Sin. 53 3424

    [6]

    Kuranz C C, Park H S, Remington B A, Drake R P, Miles A R, Robey H F, Kilkenny J D, Keane C J, Kalantar D H, Huntington C M, Krauland C M, Harding E C, Grosskopf M J, Marion D C, Doss F W, Myra E, Maddox B, Young B, Kline J L, Kyrala G, Plewa T, Wheeler J C, Arnett W D, Wallace R J, Giraldez E, Nikroo A 2011 Astrophys. Space Sci. 336 207Google Scholar

    [7]

    Tubman E R, Scott R H H, Doyle H W, Meinecke J, Ahmed H, Alraddadi R A B, Bolis R, Cross J E, Crowston R, Doria D, Lamb D, Reville B, Robinson A P L, Tzeferacos P, Borghesi M, Gregori G, Woolsey N C 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 103124Google Scholar

    [8]

    Remington B A, Drake R P, Ryutov D D 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 755Google Scholar

    [9]

    Edens A D, Ditmire T, Hansen J F, Edwards M J, Adams R G, Rambo P, Ruggles L, Smith I C, Porter J L 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 4968Google Scholar

    [10]

    Reighard A B, Drake R P, Dannenberg K K, Kremer D J, Grosskopf M, Harding E C, Leibrandt D R, Glendinning S G, Perry T S, Remington B A, Greenough J, Knauer J, Boehly T, Bouquet S, Boireau L, Koenig M, Vinci T 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 082901Google Scholar

    [11]

    Benuzzi A, Koenig M, Faral B, Krishnan J, Pisani F, Batani D, Bossi S, Beretta D, Hall T, Ellwi S, Hüller S, Honrubia J, Grandjouan N 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 2410Google Scholar

    [12]

    Hansen J F, Edwards M J, Froula D H, Edens A D, Gregori G, Ditmire T 2007 Astrophys. Space Sci. 307 219Google Scholar

    [13]

    Bouquet S, Stéhlé C, Koenig M, Chiéze J P, Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Batani D, Leygnac S, Fleury X, Merdji H, Michaut C, Thais F, Grandjouan N, Hall T, Henry E, Malka V, Lafon J P J 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 225001Google Scholar

    [14]

    Morioka T, Sakurai N, Maeno K, Honma H 2000 J. Visulaization. 3 51Google Scholar

    [15]

    Bykovaa N G, Zabelinskiia I E, Ibragimovaa L B, Kozlova P V, Stovbunb S V, Terezab A M, Shatalova O P 2018 Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 12 108Google Scholar

    [16]

    Hall T A, Benuzzi A, Batani D, Beretta D, Bossi S, Faral B, Koenig M, Krishnan J, Löwer T, Mahdieh M 1997 Phys. Rev. E 55 6

    [17]

    Vinci T, Koenig M, Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Michaut C, Boireau L, Leygnac S, Bouquet S, Peyrusse O, Batani D 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 010702Google Scholar

    [18]

    Koenig M, Vinci T, Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Ozaki N, Ravasio A, Rabec le Glohaec M, Boireau L, Michaut C, Bouquet S, Atzeni S, Schiavi A, Peyrusse O, Batani D 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 056504Google Scholar

    [19]

    Kuramitsu Y, Ohnishi N, Sakawa Y, Morita T, Tanji H, Ide T, Nishio K, Gregory C D, Waugh J N, Booth N, Heathcote R, Murphy C, Gregori G, Smallcombe J, Barton C, Dizière A, Koenig M, Woolsey N, Matsumoto Y, Mizuta A, Sugiyama T, Matsukiyo S, Moritaka T, Sano T, Takabe H 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 032126Google Scholar

    [20]

    Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Koenig M, Ravasio A, Vinci T, Ozaki N, Rabec le Gloahec M, Loupias B, Huser G, Henry E, Bouquet S, Michaut C, Hicks D, MacKinnon A, Patel P, Park H S, Le Pape S, Boehly T, Borghesi M, Cecchetti C, Notley M, Clark R, Bandyopadhyay S, Atzeni S, Schiavi A, Aglitskiy Y, Faenov A, Pikuz T, Batani D, Dezulian R, Tanaka K 2006 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 48 B347Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zheng J, Gu Y J, Chen Z Y, Chen Q F 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 026401Google Scholar

    [22]

    王瑞荣, 王伟, 方智恒, 安红海, 贾果, 谢志勇, 孟祥富 2013 物理学报 62 125202

    Wang R R, Wang W, Fang Z H, An H H, Jia G, Xie Z Y, Meng X F 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 125202

    [23]

    Sen H K, Guess A W 1957 Phys. Rev. 108 560Google Scholar

    [24]

    泽尔道维奇, 莱伊捷尔 著 (张树材 译) 2016 激波和高温流体动力学现象物理学 (北京: 科学出版社)

    Zel’dovich Y B, Raizer, Y P (translated by Zhang S C) 2016 Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Beijing: Science Press) (in Chinese)

    [25]

    Drake R P 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 043301Google Scholar

    [26]

    McClarren R G, Drake R P, Morel J E, Holloway J P 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 093301Google Scholar

    [27]

    Mabey P, Michel T, Albertazzi B, Falize E, Koenig M 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 083302Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zinn J 1973 J. Comput. Phys. 13 569Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yan J, Wu Z Q 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 066401Google Scholar

    [30]

    Bauche-Arnoult C, Bauche J, Klapisch M 1979 Phys. Rev. A 20 2424Google Scholar

    [31]

    Bar-Shalom A, Oreg J, Goldstein W H 1995 Phys. Rev. E 51 4882

    [32]

    Jin F, Zeng J, Yuan J, Han G X, Wu Z Q, Yan J, Wang M S, Peng Y L 2005 JQSRT 95 241Google Scholar

    [33]

    Li Q, Liu H F, Zhang G M, Zhao Y H, Lu G, Tian M F, Song H F 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 112709Google Scholar

    [34]

    尼基弗洛夫, 诺维科夫, 乌瓦洛夫 著 (李国政 译) 2004 高温等离子体辐射不透明度和状态方程的计算 (北京: 国防工业出版社)

    Никифоров А Ф, Новиков В Г, Уваров В Б (Переводчик Li G Z) 2004 Квантово-Статистические Модели Высокотемпературной Плазмы И Методы Расчета Росселандовых Пробегов И Уравнений Состояния (Пекин: Издательство Оборонной Промышленности) Глава IV и глава VI, раздел III (Перевод На Китайский Язык)

    [35]

    Kramida A, Ralchenko Yu, Reader J, NIST ASD Team 2020 https://physics.nist.gov/asd

    [36]

    Schmalz R F, Meyer-ter-Vehn J, Ramis R 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34 2177Google Scholar

  • 图 1  不同气体密度时氙气的辐射不透明度随光子能量的变化 (a) ρ = 5.33 × 10–7 g/cm3; (b) ρ = 5.33 × 10–3 g/cm3. 不同曲线类型表示不同的温度 (1 eV = 11610 K)

    Fig. 1.  Opacity data of xenon at the density of 5.33 × 10–7 g/cm3 (a) and 5.33 × 10–3 g/cm3 (b), lines with different style represent different temperature.

    图 2  氙气的状态方程数据 (a)温度(T, 单位为eV)与比内能(E, 单位为erg/g (1 erg/g = 10–7 J/g))之比随E的变化; (b)压强(P, 单位dyn/cm2 (1 dyn/ cm2 = 10–5 N/ cm2))与E和密度($ \rho $, 单位g/cm3)乘积之比随E的变化. 参数使用比值形式是为方便程序计算

    Fig. 2.  Equation-of-state data of xenon: (a) Variation of the ratio between temperature (T, in eV) and specific inertial energy (E, in erg/g) with E; (b) variation of ratio between pressure (P, in dyn/cm2) and the multiplication of E and density ($ \rho $, in g/cm3) with E. The parameters are shown by ratios for computation convenience.

    图 3  不同时刻氙气中的密度(a)和温度(b)的位置分布

    Fig. 3.  Variation of density (a) and temperature (b) with position at different times in xenon.

    图 4  氙气中辐射激波等效温度($ {T}_{\rm{eff}} $, eV)的时间演化曲线

    Fig. 4.  Time evolution of the effective temperature ($ {T}_{\rm{eff}} $, in eV) of radiative shock in xenon.

    图 5  辐射激波不同波段辐射能流的时间演化, 图像亮度代表辐射能流大小

    Fig. 5.  Time evolution of radiation flux at different wavelength of the radiative shock, and the radiation flux are represented by the brightness of the figure.

    图 6  不同时刻氙气的对外辐射光谱与相同等效温度下的黑体辐射光谱的比较 (a) 1 μs; (b) 6 μs

    Fig. 6.  Spectrums radiated from radiative shock in xenon and spectrums of blackbody radiation at the same effective temperature at different time: (a) 1 μs; (b) 6 μs.

    图 7  高温区表面(虚线)、激波表面(点线)的黑体辐射光谱与氙气对外辐射光谱(实线)的比较. (a)−(i)代表不同时刻的计算结果, 辐射能流统一投影到激波表面以避免球几何发散带来的影响

    Fig. 7.  Comparison among the blackbody spectrums at the surface of high-temperature-core (dash line), at the surface of the shock (dotted line), and the radiation spectrum outward-emitted by the radiative shock (solid line). (a)−(i) represent the result at different time, and all the radiation fluxes are projected on the shock surfaces to eliminate the spherical spreading effect.

    图 8  380−460 nm波段的辐射吸收系数随位置的分布, 虚线为由外向内累积光学厚度为1的位置. (a)−(i)代表不同时刻, 时间与图7相同

    Fig. 8.  Variation of absorption coefficient at 380−460 nm with position, the dash line mark the position where the optical depth equal to 1 from outside-in. Panel (a)−(i) are the same time as in Fig. 7.

  • [1]

    Ensman L, Burrows A 1992 Astrophys. J. 393 742Google Scholar

    [2]

    DE Young D S 1991 Science 252 389Google Scholar

    [3]

    Chakrabarti S K, Titarchuk L G 1995 Astrophys. J. 455 623Google Scholar

    [4]

    Pak A, Divol L, Gregori G, Weber S, Atherton J, Bennedetti R, Bradley D K, Callahan D, Casey D T, Dewald E, Döppner T, Edwards M J, Frenje J A, Glenn S, Grim G P, Hicks D, Hsing W W, Izumi N, Jones O S, Johnson M G, Khan S F, Kilkenny J D, Kline J L, Kyrala G A, Lindl J, Landen O L, Le Pape S, Ma T, MacPhee A, MacGowan B J, MacKinnon A J, Masse L, Meezan N B, Moody J D, Olson R E, Ralph J E, Robey H F, Park H S, Remington B A, Ross J S, Tommasini R, Town R P J, Smalyuk V, Glenzer S H, Moses E I 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 056315Google Scholar

    [5]

    江少恩, 李文洪, 孙可煦, 蒋小华, 刘永刚, 崔延莉, 陈久森, 丁永坤, 郑志坚 2004 物理学报 53 3424

    Jiang S E, Li W H, Sun K X, Jiang X H, Liu Y G, Gui Y L, Chen J S, Ding Y K, Zheng Z J 2004 Acta Phys. Sin. 53 3424

    [6]

    Kuranz C C, Park H S, Remington B A, Drake R P, Miles A R, Robey H F, Kilkenny J D, Keane C J, Kalantar D H, Huntington C M, Krauland C M, Harding E C, Grosskopf M J, Marion D C, Doss F W, Myra E, Maddox B, Young B, Kline J L, Kyrala G, Plewa T, Wheeler J C, Arnett W D, Wallace R J, Giraldez E, Nikroo A 2011 Astrophys. Space Sci. 336 207Google Scholar

    [7]

    Tubman E R, Scott R H H, Doyle H W, Meinecke J, Ahmed H, Alraddadi R A B, Bolis R, Cross J E, Crowston R, Doria D, Lamb D, Reville B, Robinson A P L, Tzeferacos P, Borghesi M, Gregori G, Woolsey N C 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 103124Google Scholar

    [8]

    Remington B A, Drake R P, Ryutov D D 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 755Google Scholar

    [9]

    Edens A D, Ditmire T, Hansen J F, Edwards M J, Adams R G, Rambo P, Ruggles L, Smith I C, Porter J L 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 4968Google Scholar

    [10]

    Reighard A B, Drake R P, Dannenberg K K, Kremer D J, Grosskopf M, Harding E C, Leibrandt D R, Glendinning S G, Perry T S, Remington B A, Greenough J, Knauer J, Boehly T, Bouquet S, Boireau L, Koenig M, Vinci T 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 082901Google Scholar

    [11]

    Benuzzi A, Koenig M, Faral B, Krishnan J, Pisani F, Batani D, Bossi S, Beretta D, Hall T, Ellwi S, Hüller S, Honrubia J, Grandjouan N 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 2410Google Scholar

    [12]

    Hansen J F, Edwards M J, Froula D H, Edens A D, Gregori G, Ditmire T 2007 Astrophys. Space Sci. 307 219Google Scholar

    [13]

    Bouquet S, Stéhlé C, Koenig M, Chiéze J P, Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Batani D, Leygnac S, Fleury X, Merdji H, Michaut C, Thais F, Grandjouan N, Hall T, Henry E, Malka V, Lafon J P J 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 225001Google Scholar

    [14]

    Morioka T, Sakurai N, Maeno K, Honma H 2000 J. Visulaization. 3 51Google Scholar

    [15]

    Bykovaa N G, Zabelinskiia I E, Ibragimovaa L B, Kozlova P V, Stovbunb S V, Terezab A M, Shatalova O P 2018 Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 12 108Google Scholar

    [16]

    Hall T A, Benuzzi A, Batani D, Beretta D, Bossi S, Faral B, Koenig M, Krishnan J, Löwer T, Mahdieh M 1997 Phys. Rev. E 55 6

    [17]

    Vinci T, Koenig M, Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Michaut C, Boireau L, Leygnac S, Bouquet S, Peyrusse O, Batani D 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 010702Google Scholar

    [18]

    Koenig M, Vinci T, Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Ozaki N, Ravasio A, Rabec le Glohaec M, Boireau L, Michaut C, Bouquet S, Atzeni S, Schiavi A, Peyrusse O, Batani D 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 056504Google Scholar

    [19]

    Kuramitsu Y, Ohnishi N, Sakawa Y, Morita T, Tanji H, Ide T, Nishio K, Gregory C D, Waugh J N, Booth N, Heathcote R, Murphy C, Gregori G, Smallcombe J, Barton C, Dizière A, Koenig M, Woolsey N, Matsumoto Y, Mizuta A, Sugiyama T, Matsukiyo S, Moritaka T, Sano T, Takabe H 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 032126Google Scholar

    [20]

    Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Koenig M, Ravasio A, Vinci T, Ozaki N, Rabec le Gloahec M, Loupias B, Huser G, Henry E, Bouquet S, Michaut C, Hicks D, MacKinnon A, Patel P, Park H S, Le Pape S, Boehly T, Borghesi M, Cecchetti C, Notley M, Clark R, Bandyopadhyay S, Atzeni S, Schiavi A, Aglitskiy Y, Faenov A, Pikuz T, Batani D, Dezulian R, Tanaka K 2006 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 48 B347Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zheng J, Gu Y J, Chen Z Y, Chen Q F 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 026401Google Scholar

    [22]

    王瑞荣, 王伟, 方智恒, 安红海, 贾果, 谢志勇, 孟祥富 2013 物理学报 62 125202

    Wang R R, Wang W, Fang Z H, An H H, Jia G, Xie Z Y, Meng X F 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 125202

    [23]

    Sen H K, Guess A W 1957 Phys. Rev. 108 560Google Scholar

    [24]

    泽尔道维奇, 莱伊捷尔 著 (张树材 译) 2016 激波和高温流体动力学现象物理学 (北京: 科学出版社)

    Zel’dovich Y B, Raizer, Y P (translated by Zhang S C) 2016 Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Beijing: Science Press) (in Chinese)

    [25]

    Drake R P 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 043301Google Scholar

    [26]

    McClarren R G, Drake R P, Morel J E, Holloway J P 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 093301Google Scholar

    [27]

    Mabey P, Michel T, Albertazzi B, Falize E, Koenig M 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 083302Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zinn J 1973 J. Comput. Phys. 13 569Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yan J, Wu Z Q 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 066401Google Scholar

    [30]

    Bauche-Arnoult C, Bauche J, Klapisch M 1979 Phys. Rev. A 20 2424Google Scholar

    [31]

    Bar-Shalom A, Oreg J, Goldstein W H 1995 Phys. Rev. E 51 4882

    [32]

    Jin F, Zeng J, Yuan J, Han G X, Wu Z Q, Yan J, Wang M S, Peng Y L 2005 JQSRT 95 241Google Scholar

    [33]

    Li Q, Liu H F, Zhang G M, Zhao Y H, Lu G, Tian M F, Song H F 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 112709Google Scholar

    [34]

    尼基弗洛夫, 诺维科夫, 乌瓦洛夫 著 (李国政 译) 2004 高温等离子体辐射不透明度和状态方程的计算 (北京: 国防工业出版社)

    Никифоров А Ф, Новиков В Г, Уваров В Б (Переводчик Li G Z) 2004 Квантово-Статистические Модели Высокотемпературной Плазмы И Методы Расчета Росселандовых Пробегов И Уравнений Состояния (Пекин: Издательство Оборонной Промышленности) Глава IV и глава VI, раздел III (Перевод На Китайский Язык)

    [35]

    Kramida A, Ralchenko Yu, Reader J, NIST ASD Team 2020 https://physics.nist.gov/asd

    [36]

    Schmalz R F, Meyer-ter-Vehn J, Ramis R 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34 2177Google Scholar

  • [1] 杨孟奇, 吴福源, 陈致博, 张翼翔, 陈一, 张晋川, 陈致真, 方志凡, Rafael Ramis, 张杰. 高密度等离子体喷流高速对撞的二维辐射流体模拟研究. 物理学报, 2022, 71(22): 225202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220948
    [2] 吴永刚, 刘家兴, 刘红玲, 徐梅, 令狐荣锋. 三氯一氟甲烷分子在辐射场中的光谱性质与解离特性研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(6): 063102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182121
    [3] 刘华兵, 袁丽, 李秋梅, 谌晓洪, 杜泉, 金蓉, 陈雪连, 王玲. 6Li32S双原子分子的光谱和辐射跃迁理论研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(3): 033101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.033101
    [4] 谢安东, 谢晶, 周玲玲, 伍冬兰, 阮文, 罗文浪. 自辐射场下UN2分子的光谱研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(6): 063301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.063301
    [5] 冒晓莉, 肖韶荣, 刘清惓, 李敏, 张加宏. 探空湿度测量太阳辐射误差修正流体动力学研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(14): 144701. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.144701
    [6] 宋天明, 杨家敏. 三维柱腔内辐射输运的一维模拟. 物理学报, 2013, 62(1): 015210. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.015210
    [7] 郭凯敏, 高 勋, 郝作强, 鲁毅, 孙长凯, 林景全. 空气中飞秒激光等离子体荧光辐射光谱研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(7): 075212. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.075212
    [8] 马晶, 车驰, 于思源, 谭丽英, 周彦平, 王健. 光纤布拉格光栅辐射损伤及其对光谱特性的影响. 物理学报, 2012, 61(6): 064201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.064201
    [9] 谢安东, 周玲玲, 阮文, 伍冬兰, 罗文浪. 自辐射场下PuO分子光谱研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(4): 043302. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.043302
    [10] 蒲昱东, 杨家敏, 靳奉涛, 张璐, 丁永坤. 辐射输运实验中的Al等离子体发射光谱研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(4): 045210. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.045210
    [11] 钟武律, 段旭如, 余德良, 韩晓玉, 杨立梅. HL-2A托卡马克中性束辐射光谱的数值模拟. 物理学报, 2010, 59(5): 3336-3343. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3336
    [12] 张霖, 张淳民, 简小华. 高层大气风场洛伦兹光谱线型粒子辐射率探测研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(2): 899-906. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.899
    [13] 远晓辉, 李玉同, 徐妙华, 于全芝, 王首钧, 张 杰, 赵 卫, 王光昶, 温贤伦, 焦春晔, 何颖伶, 张双根, 王向贤, 黄文忠, 谷渝秋. 超热电子产生的靶后相干渡越辐射光谱实验研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(10): 5362-5367. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5362
    [14] 王 薇, 张 杰, 赵 刚. 吸积盘的X射线辐射对周围星际物质的离化研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(1): 287-293. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.287
    [15] 王 薇, 张 杰, 董全力, V.K.Senecha. 靶的厚度对激光产生的x射线输运到靶后能谱的影响. 物理学报, 2004, 53(3): 967-972. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.967
    [16] 王薇, 张杰, V.K.Senecha. 对激光等离子体中X射线的产生与辐射加热研究. 物理学报, 2002, 51(3): 590-595. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.590
    [17] 张树东, 张为俊. 激光烧蚀Al靶产生的等离子体中辐射粒子的速度及激波. 物理学报, 2001, 50(8): 1512-1516. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1512
    [18] 张杰, 王薇. 冲击波在铝靶中传播的数值模拟研究. 物理学报, 2001, 50(4): 741-747. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.741
    [19] 赵理曾, 雷子明, 张秀兰, 江德仪, 沈立康, 卢振中, 聂玉昕, 张景园, 高人和, 金树衡, 李琼如. 钠蒸汽中通过四波参量过程产生紫外相干辐射的光谱特性. 物理学报, 1985, 34(9): 1208-1211. doi: 10.7498/aps.34.1208
    [20] 陈仁. 关于磁流体力学激波中的开闸激震与关闸激震是否存在的问题. 物理学报, 1966, 22(9): 1098-1102. doi: 10.7498/aps.22.1098
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5368
  • PDF下载量:  100
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-06-19
  • 修回日期:  2021-01-05
  • 上网日期:  2021-03-21
  • 刊出日期:  2021-04-05

/

返回文章
返回