搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

无注入型发光二极管的载流子输运模型研究

赵建铖 吴朝兴 郭太良

引用本文:
Citation:

无注入型发光二极管的载流子输运模型研究

赵建铖, 吴朝兴, 郭太良

Carrier transport model of non-carrier-injection light-emitting diode

Zhao Jian-Cheng, Wu Chao-Xing, Guo Tai-Liang
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 无载流子注入型发光二极管(简称无注入型LED)因其简单的器件结构有望应用于Micro-LED、纳米像元发光显示等新型微显示技术. 由于没有外部载流子注入, 无注入型LED的内部载流子输运行为无法直接用传统的PN结理论进行描述. 因此, 建立无注入型LED的载流子输运模型对于理解其工作机理和提高器件性能具有重要意义. 本文根据无注入型LED的器件结构, 结合PN结理论建立无注入型LED的载流子输运数学模型. 基于该数学模型解释器件的工作原理, 获得器件的载流子输运特性, 揭示感应电荷区长度、内部PN结压降与外加驱动电压频率的关系. 根据建立的数学模型提出了针对无注入型LED器件设计的建议: 1)减小感应电荷区掺杂浓度, 可有效提高内部LED的压降; 2)利用PN结的隧穿效应, 可有效提高器件内部LED的压降; 3)使用正负方波驱动可以获得比正弦驱动更大的内部LED压降. 本文有关无注入型LED的载流子输运模型的研究有望为改善无注入型LED器件结构、优化工作模式提供理论指导.
    Non-carrier-injection light-emitting diodes (NCI-LEDs) are expected to be widely used in the next-generation micro-display technologies, including Micro-LEDs and nano-pixel light-emitting displays due to their simple device structures. However, because there is no external charge carrier injection, the internal carrier transport behavior of the NCI-LED cannot be described by using the traditional PN junction and LED theory. Therefore, establishing a carrier-transport model for the NCI-LED is of great significance in understanding its working mechanism and improving device performance. In this work, carrier transport mathematical model of the NCI-LED is established and the mechanical behavior of charge-carrier transport is analyzed quantitatively. Based on the mathematical model, the working mechanism of the NCI-LED is explained, the carrier transport characteristics of the device are obtained. Additionally, the key features, including the length of the induced charge region, the forward biased voltage across the internal PN junction, and the reverse biased voltage across the internal PN junction are studied. Their relationships with the applied frequency of the applied driving voltage are revealed. It is found that both the forward bias and reverse bias of the internal PN junction increase with the driving frequency. When the driving frequency reaches a certain value, the forward bias and the reverse bias of the PN junction will be maintained at a maximum value. Moreover, the length of the induced charge region decreases with the increase of the driving frequency, and when the frequency reaches a certain value, the induced charge region will always be in the state of exhaustion. According to the mathematical model, suggestions for the device optimization design are provided below. 1) Reducing the doping concentration of the induced charge region can effectively increase the voltage drop across the internal LED; 2) employing the tunneling effect occurring in the reverse-biased PN junction can effectively improve the electroluminescence intensity; 3) using the square-wave driving voltage can obtain a larger voltage drop across the internal LED and increase the electroluminescence intensity. This work on the carrier transport model is expected to e present a clear physical figure for understanding the working mechanism of NCI-LED, and to provide a theoretical guidance for optimizing the device structure.
      通信作者: 吴朝兴, chaoxing_wu@fzu.edu.cn ; 郭太良, gtl_fzu@hotmail.com
    • 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号2021YFB3600404)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Wu Chao-Xing, chaoxing_wu@fzu.edu.cn ; Guo Tai-Liang, gtl_fzu@hotmail.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFB3600404).
    [1]

    邰建鹏, 郭伟玲, 李梦梅, 邓杰, 陈佳昕 2020 物理学报 69 177301Google Scholar

    Tai J P, Guo W L, Li M M, Deng J, Chen J X 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 177301Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhou X, Tian P, Sher C W, Wu J, Liu H, Liu R, Kuo H C 2020 Prog. Quantum Electron. 71 100263

    [3]

    Lee H E, Shin J H, Park J H, Hong S K, Park S H, Lee S H, Lee J H, Kang I S, Lee K J 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1808075Google Scholar

    [4]

    Bower C A, Meitl M A, Raymond B, Radauscher E, Cok R, Bonafede S, Gomez D, Moore T, Prevatte C, Fisher B, Rotzoll R, Melnik G A, Fecioru A, Trindade A J 2017 Photonics Res. 5 A23Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wu C, Wang K, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Guo T 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett 12 3522Google Scholar

    [6]

    Li S, Waag A 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 071101Google Scholar

    [7]

    Jung B O, Bae S Y, Lee S, Kim S Y, Lee J Y, Honda Y, Amano H 2016 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11 215Google Scholar

    [8]

    高承浩, 徐峰, 张丽, 赵德胜, 魏星, 车玲娟, 庄永漳, 张宝顺, 张晶 2020 物理学报 69 027802Google Scholar

    Gao C H, Xu F, Zhang L, Zhao D S, Wei X, Che L J, Zhuang Y Z, Zhang B S, Zhang J 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 027802Google Scholar

    [9]

    Ogawa K, Hachiya R, Mizutani T, Ishijima S, Kikuchi A 2016 Phys. Status Solidi A 214 1600613Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ra Y H, Wang R, Woo S Y, Djavid M, Sadaf S M, Lee J, Botton G A, Mi Z 2016 Nano Lett. 16 4608Google Scholar

    [11]

    Choi H, Jeon C, Dawson M 2004 IEEE Electr. Device L. 25 277Google Scholar

    [12]

    Gong Z, Zhang H, Gu E, Griffin C, Dawson M D, Poher V, Kennedy G, French P, Neil M 2007 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 54 2650Google Scholar

    [13]

    Konoplev S S, Bulashevich K A, Karpov S Y 2018 Phys. Status. Solidi. A 215 1700508Google Scholar

    [14]

    Adivarahan V, Wu S, Sun W, Mandavilli V, Shatalov M, Simin G, Yang J, Maruska H, Khan M A 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 1838Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wang K, Liu Y, Chen R, Wu C X, Zhou X T, Zhang Y A, Liu Z Q, Guo T L 2021 IEEE Electr. Device Lett. 42 1033Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang K, Chen P, Chen J, Liu Y, Wu C X, Sun J, Zhou X T, Zhang Y A, Guo T L 2021 Opt. Laser Technol. 140 107044Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wang K, Liu Y, Wu C X, Li D, Lv S, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Guo T L 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wu C X, Wang K, Guo T L 2022 Nanomaterials 12 2532Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li W, Wang K, Li J, Wu C X, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Guo T L 2022 Nanomaterials 12 912Google Scholar

    [20]

    Sze S M, Li Y, Ng K K 2021 Physics of Semiconductor Devices (John Wiley & Sons)

    [21]

    Huang F, Wang Z, Chu C, Liu Q, Li Y, Xin Z, Zhang Y, Sun Q, Zhang Z H 2022 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 69 5522Google Scholar

  • 图 1  无注入型LED结构示意图

    Fig. 1.  Schematic diagram of non-carrier-injection LED.

    图 2  无注入型LED内部的电荷分布示意图

    Fig. 2.  Schematic diagram of charge distribution in non-carrier-injection LED.

    图 3  外加电压、PN结电压、P区感应电荷区理想/实际长度在 (a)电压频率为40 Hz, (b)电压频率为100 Hz的变化情况; (c) 单周期内PN结电压变化; (d) 单周期内P区感应电荷区实际长度变化; (e) 不同频率下的PN结电压最大值与最小值; (f) 不同频率下的P区感应电荷区实际长度变化

    Fig. 3.  Applied voltage, PN junction voltage, ideal/actual length of induced charge region in P region at the voltage frequency is 40 Hz (a) and 100 Hz (b); (c) PN junction voltage in one voltage period; (d) actual length of induced charge region in the P region in one voltage period; (e) maximum/minimum PN junction voltage under different frequencies; (e) actual length of induced charge region in P region under different frequencies.

    图 4  P侧感应电荷区变化示意图

    Fig. 4.  Schematic diagram of induced charge area change in P region.

    图 5  (a) 绝缘层压降占比; (b) PN结电压最大值/最小值

    Fig. 5.  (a) Voltage ratio of insulation layer voltage; (b) maximum/minimum PN junction voltage.

    图 6  (a)单周期内PN结电压变化; (b) 单周期内P区感应电荷区实际长度变化;

    Fig. 6.  (a) Voltage change of PN junction in one voltage period; (b) actual length change of the induced charge region in P region in one voltage period.

    图 7  不同频率下的PN结电压最大值

    Fig. 7.  Maximum PN junction voltage under different frequencies.

    图 8  外加电压、PN结电压、P区感应电荷区理想/实际长度变化情况

    Fig. 8.  Applied voltage, PN junction voltage, ideal/actual length of induced charge region in P region.

    图 9  (a)单位周期PN结电压变化; (b) 单位周期P区感应电荷区实际长度变化

    Fig. 9.  (a)Voltage of PN junction in one voltage period; (b) actual length of the induced charge region in P region in one voltage period.

  • [1]

    邰建鹏, 郭伟玲, 李梦梅, 邓杰, 陈佳昕 2020 物理学报 69 177301Google Scholar

    Tai J P, Guo W L, Li M M, Deng J, Chen J X 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 177301Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhou X, Tian P, Sher C W, Wu J, Liu H, Liu R, Kuo H C 2020 Prog. Quantum Electron. 71 100263

    [3]

    Lee H E, Shin J H, Park J H, Hong S K, Park S H, Lee S H, Lee J H, Kang I S, Lee K J 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1808075Google Scholar

    [4]

    Bower C A, Meitl M A, Raymond B, Radauscher E, Cok R, Bonafede S, Gomez D, Moore T, Prevatte C, Fisher B, Rotzoll R, Melnik G A, Fecioru A, Trindade A J 2017 Photonics Res. 5 A23Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wu C, Wang K, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Guo T 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett 12 3522Google Scholar

    [6]

    Li S, Waag A 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 071101Google Scholar

    [7]

    Jung B O, Bae S Y, Lee S, Kim S Y, Lee J Y, Honda Y, Amano H 2016 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11 215Google Scholar

    [8]

    高承浩, 徐峰, 张丽, 赵德胜, 魏星, 车玲娟, 庄永漳, 张宝顺, 张晶 2020 物理学报 69 027802Google Scholar

    Gao C H, Xu F, Zhang L, Zhao D S, Wei X, Che L J, Zhuang Y Z, Zhang B S, Zhang J 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 027802Google Scholar

    [9]

    Ogawa K, Hachiya R, Mizutani T, Ishijima S, Kikuchi A 2016 Phys. Status Solidi A 214 1600613Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ra Y H, Wang R, Woo S Y, Djavid M, Sadaf S M, Lee J, Botton G A, Mi Z 2016 Nano Lett. 16 4608Google Scholar

    [11]

    Choi H, Jeon C, Dawson M 2004 IEEE Electr. Device L. 25 277Google Scholar

    [12]

    Gong Z, Zhang H, Gu E, Griffin C, Dawson M D, Poher V, Kennedy G, French P, Neil M 2007 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 54 2650Google Scholar

    [13]

    Konoplev S S, Bulashevich K A, Karpov S Y 2018 Phys. Status. Solidi. A 215 1700508Google Scholar

    [14]

    Adivarahan V, Wu S, Sun W, Mandavilli V, Shatalov M, Simin G, Yang J, Maruska H, Khan M A 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 1838Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wang K, Liu Y, Chen R, Wu C X, Zhou X T, Zhang Y A, Liu Z Q, Guo T L 2021 IEEE Electr. Device Lett. 42 1033Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang K, Chen P, Chen J, Liu Y, Wu C X, Sun J, Zhou X T, Zhang Y A, Guo T L 2021 Opt. Laser Technol. 140 107044Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wang K, Liu Y, Wu C X, Li D, Lv S, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Guo T L 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wu C X, Wang K, Guo T L 2022 Nanomaterials 12 2532Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li W, Wang K, Li J, Wu C X, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Guo T L 2022 Nanomaterials 12 912Google Scholar

    [20]

    Sze S M, Li Y, Ng K K 2021 Physics of Semiconductor Devices (John Wiley & Sons)

    [21]

    Huang F, Wang Z, Chu C, Liu Q, Li Y, Xin Z, Zhang Y, Sun Q, Zhang Z H 2022 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 69 5522Google Scholar

  • [1] 李雪, 曹宝龙, 王明昊, 冯增勤, 陈淑芬. 基于改性空穴注入层与复合发光层的高效钙钛矿发光二极管. 物理学报, 2021, 70(4): 048502. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201379
    [2] 陈佳楣, 苏杭, 李婉, 张立来, 索鑫磊, 钦敬, 朱坤, 李国龙. 钙钛矿发光二极管光提取性能增强的研究进展. 物理学报, 2020, 69(21): 218501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200755
    [3] 吴家龙, 窦永江, 张建凤, 王浩然, 杨绪勇. 溶液法制备的金属掺杂氧化镍空穴注入层在钙钛矿发光二极管上的应用. 物理学报, 2020, 69(1): 018101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191269
    [4] 王党会, 许天旱. 蓝紫光发光二极管中的低频产生-复合噪声行为研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(12): 128104. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190189
    [5] 瞿子涵, 储泽马, 张兴旺, 游经碧. 高效绿光钙钛矿发光二极管研究进展. 物理学报, 2019, 68(15): 158504. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190647
    [6] 黄伟, 李跃龙, 任慧志, 王鹏阳, 魏长春, 侯国付, 张德坤, 许盛之, 王广才, 赵颖, 袁明鉴, 张晓丹. 基于N型纳米晶硅氧电子注入层的钙钛矿发光二极管. 物理学报, 2019, 68(12): 128103. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190258
    [7] 贾博仑, 邓玲玲, 陈若曦, 张雅男, 房旭民. 利用Ag@SiO2纳米粒子等离子体共振增强发光二极管辐射功率的数值研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(23): 237801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.237801
    [8] 王党会, 许天旱, 王荣, 雒设计, 姚婷珍. InGaN/GaN多量子阱结构发光二极管发光机理转变的低频电流噪声表征. 物理学报, 2015, 64(5): 050701. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.050701
    [9] 陈伟超, 唐慧丽, 罗平, 麻尉蔚, 徐晓东, 钱小波, 姜大朋, 吴锋, 王静雅, 徐军. GaN基发光二极管衬底材料的研究进展. 物理学报, 2014, 63(6): 068103. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.068103
    [10] 阮鹏, 谢冀江, 潘其坤, 张来明, 郭劲. 非链式脉冲DF化学激光器反应动力学模型. 物理学报, 2013, 62(9): 094208. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.094208
    [11] 高晖, 孔凡敏, 李康, 陈新莲, 丁庆安, 孙静. 双层光子晶体氮化镓蓝光发光二极管结构优化的研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(12): 127807. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.127807
    [12] 王光绪, 陶喜霞, 熊传兵, 刘军林, 封飞飞, 张萌, 江风益. 牺牲Ni退火对硅衬底GaN基发光二极管p型接触影响的研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(7): 078503. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.078503
    [13] 薛正群, 黄生荣, 张保平, 陈朝. 激光诱导p-GaN掺杂对发光二极管性能改善的分析. 物理学报, 2010, 59(2): 1268-1274. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1268
    [14] 朱丽虹, 蔡加法, 李晓莹, 邓彪, 刘宝林. In组分渐变提高InGaN/GaN多量子阱发光二极管发光性能. 物理学报, 2010, 59(7): 4996-5001. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4996
    [15] 李为军, 张波, 徐文兰, 陆卫. InGaN/GaN多量子阱蓝色发光二极管的实验与模拟分析. 物理学报, 2009, 58(5): 3421-3426. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3421
    [16] 李炳乾, 郑同场, 夏正浩. GaN基蓝光发光二极管正向电压温度特性研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(10): 7189-7193. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7189
    [17] 沈光地, 张剑铭, 邹德恕, 徐 晨, 顾晓玲. 大功率GaN基发光二极管的电流扩展效应及电极结构优化研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(1): 472-476. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.472
    [18] 张剑铭, 邹德恕, 徐 晨, 顾晓玲, 沈光地. 电极结构优化对大功率GaN基发光二极管性能的影响. 物理学报, 2007, 56(10): 6003-6007. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6003
    [19] 胡 瑾, 杜 磊, 庄奕琪, 包军林, 周 江. 发光二极管可靠性的噪声表征. 物理学报, 2006, 55(3): 1384-1389. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1384
    [20] 刘乃鑫, 王怀兵, 刘建平, 牛南辉, 韩 军, 沈光地. p型氮化镓的低温生长及发光二极管器件的研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(3): 1424-1429. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1424
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3792
  • PDF下载量:  70
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-09-20
  • 修回日期:  2022-11-12
  • 上网日期:  2022-12-17
  • 刊出日期:  2023-02-20

/

返回文章
返回