应变增强Nb掺杂SrTiO<sub>3</sub>薄膜热电性能

马云鹏; 庄华鹭; 李敬锋; 李千

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20222301

摘要

高性能热电材料的发展有望帮助解决未来能源危机, 且随着可穿戴器件的发展与应用, 热电材料和器件除了要具备更高的热-电转化性能以外, 还必须具有良好的柔性. 将热电材料制成薄膜既可以为微型器件供电, 也有潜力应用于柔性器件. 本文使用脉冲激光沉积方法, 在商用SrTiO₃ (STO)和La_0.3Sr_0.7Al_0.65Ta_0.35O₃ (LSAT)衬底上制备得到了不同厚度的高质量铌掺杂钛酸锶薄膜(Nb:STO), 并对薄膜的表面形貌、结构以及热电性能进行表征与测试. 结果显示, 使用LSAT作为衬底可以对薄膜施加面内压应变, 随着薄膜厚度的增大, 应变逐渐释放并接近于块体Nb:STO. 随着厚度的增大, 薄膜的热电性能逐渐提升, 在STO衬底上生长的208 nm厚样品的室温功率因子相比于52 nm样品提升了187%. 此外, 144 nm厚度的Nb:STO/LSAT薄膜室温塞贝克系数达到了265.95 μV/K, 这是由于衬底应变导致薄膜样品的能带变化. 本工作表明通过应变工程调控铌掺杂钛酸锶薄膜热电性能的可行性, 为后续提高此类薄膜材料的热电性能提供了一种新思路.

关键词:

脉冲激光沉积 /
热电 /
钛酸锶 /
薄膜

Abstract

The development of high-performance thermoelectric materials can help solve the energy crisis in the future. Thin-film thermoelectric materials can meet the requirement for flexibility of wearable devices while supplying electrical power to them. In this study, high-quality Nb-doped SrTiO₃ films (Nb:STO) with different thickness are prepared on SrTiO₃ (STO) and La_0.3Sr_0.7Al_0.65Ta_0.35O₃ (LSAT) substrates by pulsed laser deposition. The surface morphologies, crystal structures, and thermoelectric performances of the films are characterized. The results show that the thermoelectric performance of the strain-free film increase with thickness increasing. The power factor at room temperature increases by 187%. The Seebeck coefficient of the 144 nm-thick Nb:STO/LSAT sample with strain is greatly improved to $265.95\;{\text{μ}}{\rm{V}}/{\rm{K}}$ at room temperature, which is likely to be due to the strain induced changes in the energy band of the thin film. The improvement of the thermoelectric performances of Nb:STO thin films by strain engineering provides a new approach to improving the thermoelectric properties of oxide thin films.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

清华大学材料学院, 新型陶瓷与精细工艺国家重点实验室, 北京　100084

通信作者: 李千, qianli_mse@tsinghua.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2020YFA0309100)和国家自然科学基金委原创探索计划(批准号: 52150092)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Corresponding author: Li Qian, qianli_mse@tsinghua.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFA0309100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No. 52150092).

文章全文

参考文献

[1]	Utlu Z, Hepbasli A 2007 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11 1 Google Scholar
[2]	Zhang B, Wang J, Zou T, Zhang S, Yaer X, Ding N, Liu C, Miao L, Li Y, Wu Y 2015 J. Mater. Chem. C 3 11406 Google Scholar
[3]	Gao W, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Yuan G, Liu J M 2020 J. Materiomics 6 1 Google Scholar
[4]	Chiang C K, Fincher C R, Park Y W, Heeger A J, Shirakawa H, Louis E J, Gau S C, MacDiarmid A G 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 1098 Google Scholar
[5]	Fan Z, Du D, Yu Z, Li P, Xia Y, Ouyang J 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 23204 Google Scholar
[6]	Jalan B, Stemmer S 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 042106 Google Scholar
[7]	Ohta H, Kim S, Mune Y, Mizoguchi T, Nomura K, Ohta S, Nomura T, Nakanishi Y, Ikuhara Y, Hirano M, Hosono H, Koumoto K 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 129 Google Scholar
[8]	Pu J, Kanahashi K, Cuong N T, Chen C H, Li L J, Okada S, Ohta H, Takenobu T 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 014312 Google Scholar
[9]	Li P, Li L, Zeng X C 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 3106 Google Scholar
[10]	Zhang X, Liu B, Liu S, Li J, Liu R, Wang P, Dong Q, Li S, Tian H, Li Q, Liu B 2021 J. Alloys Compd. 867 158923 Google Scholar
[11]	Wang N, Li M, Xiao H, Gong H, Liu Z, Zu X, Qiao L 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 15097 Google Scholar
[12]	Xu R, Huang J, Barnard E S, Hong S S, Singh P, Wong E K, Jansen T, Harbola V, Xiao J, Wang B Y, Crossley S, Lu D, Liu S, Hwang H Y 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 3141 Google Scholar
[13]	Dong Z, Chen H, Qi M, Shen J, Liu W, Guo E, Li D, Zhang Y, Wu Z 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2100454 Google Scholar
[14]	Tikhomirov O, Jiang H, Levy J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 147601 Google Scholar
[15]	Haeni J H, Irvin P, Chang W, Uecker R, Reiche P, Li Y L, Choudhury S, Tian W, Hawley M E, Craigo B, Tagantsev A K, Pan X Q, Streiffer S K, Chen L Q, Kirchoefer S W, Levy J, Schlom D G 2004 Nature 430 758 Google Scholar
[16]	Bhansali S, Khunsin W, Chatterjee A, Santiso J, Abad B, Martin-Gonzalez M, Jakob G, Sotomayor Torres C M, Chávez-Angel E 2019 Nanoscale Adv. 1 3647 Google Scholar
[17]	Janotti A, Steiauf D, Van de Walle C G 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 201304 Google Scholar
[18]	Bellucci A, Mastellone M, Girolami M, Orlando S, Medici L, Mezzi A, Kaciulis S, Polini R, Trucchi D M 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 418 589 Google Scholar
[19]	Venkatasubramanian R, Siivola E, Colpitts T, O’Quinn B 2001 Nature 413 597 Google Scholar
[20]	Chen Z J, Zhou B Y, Li J X, Wen C L 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 386 389 Google Scholar
[21]	Varghese T, Hollar C, Richardson J, Kempf N, Han C, Gamarachchi P, Estrada D, Mehta R J, Zhang Y 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 33135 Google Scholar
[22]	Wunderlich W, Ohta H, Koumoto K 2009 Phys. B Condens. Matter 404 2202 Google Scholar
[23]	Benthem K, Elsässer C, French R H 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 90 6156 Google Scholar
[24]	Apreutesei M, Debord R, Bouras M, Regreny P, Botella C, Benamrouche A, Carretero-Genevrier A, Gazquez J, Grenet G, Pailhès S, Saint-Girons G, Bachelet R 2017 Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18 430 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhao T, Lu H B, Chen F, Dai S Y, Yang G Z, Chen Z H 2000 J. Cryst. Growth 212 451 Google Scholar
[26]	Kumar S R S, Barasheed A Z, Alshareef H N 2013 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5 7268 Google Scholar
[27]	Blennow P, Hagen A, Hansen K, Wallenberg L, Mogensen M 2008 Solid State Ion. 179 2047 Google Scholar
[28]	Chan N H, Sharma R K, Smyth D M 1981 J. Electrochem. Soc. 128 1762 Google Scholar
[29]	Culbertson C M, Flak A T, Yatskin M, Cheong P H Y, Cann D P, Dolgos M R 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 3729 Google Scholar
[30]	Chatterjee A, Lan Z, Christensen D V, Bauitti F, Morata A, Chavez-Angel E, Sanna S, Castelli I E, Chen Y, Tarancon A, Pryds N 2022 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 3741 Google Scholar
[31]	Ohtomo A, Hwang H Y 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 1716 Google Scholar
[32]	Hicks L D, Dresselhaus M S 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 12727 Google Scholar
[33]	许静, 何梓民, 杨文龙, 吴荣, 赖晓芳, 简基康 2022 物理学报 71 197301 Google Scholar Xu J, He Z M, Yang W L, Wu R, Lai X F, Jian J K 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 197301 Google Scholar
[34]	Matthews J, Blakeslee A 1974 J. Cryst. Growth 27 118 Google Scholar
[35]	Wang T, Ganguly K, Marshall P, Xu P, Jalan B 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 212904 Google Scholar
[36]	Zou D, Liu Y, Xie S, Lin J, Li J 2013 Chem. Phys. Lett. 586 159 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 不同厚度Nb:STO/STO薄膜生长状况表征　(a) XRD谱; (b) AFM形貌图; (c) EDS, 插表为原子摩尔比

Fig. 1. Characterization of Nb doped SrTiO₃ thin films on (001) SrTiO₃ substrates with different thicknesses: (a) XRD spectrum; (b) AFM image; (c) EDS, the inset is the measured element composition.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同厚度 Nb:STO/STO 薄膜在不同温度下的面内热电性能　(a)电导率; (b)载流子浓度; (c)塞贝克系数; (d)功率因子

Fig. 2. Temperature dependence of in-plane thermoelectric properties of Nb:STO/STO thin films with different thicknesses: (a) Conductivities; (b) carrier concentrations; (c) Seebeck coefficients; (d) power factors.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 NSTO/LSAT 薄膜生长状况表征　(a) AFM形貌图; (b) XRD谱; (c) 薄膜 c 轴晶格常数

Fig. 3. Characterization of Nb:STO/LSAT thin films: (a) AFM image; (b) XRD spectrum; (c) lattice parameters of the c axis.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同厚度Nb:STO/STO和Nb:STO/LSAT 薄膜在不同温度下的面内热电性能　(a) 电导率; (b) 塞贝克系数; (c) 功率因子; (d) 不同衬底、厚度薄膜的电导率对比

Fig. 4. Temperature dependence of in-plane thermoelectric properties of Nb:STO/STO and Nb:STO/LSAT thin films with different thicknesses: (a) Conductivities; (b) Seebeck coefficients; (c) power factors; (d) conductivity of thin films with different thicknesses and substrates.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Utlu Z, Hepbasli A 2007 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11 1 Google Scholar
[2]	Zhang B, Wang J, Zou T, Zhang S, Yaer X, Ding N, Liu C, Miao L, Li Y, Wu Y 2015 J. Mater. Chem. C 3 11406 Google Scholar
[3]	Gao W, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Yuan G, Liu J M 2020 J. Materiomics 6 1 Google Scholar
[4]	Chiang C K, Fincher C R, Park Y W, Heeger A J, Shirakawa H, Louis E J, Gau S C, MacDiarmid A G 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 1098 Google Scholar
[5]	Fan Z, Du D, Yu Z, Li P, Xia Y, Ouyang J 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 23204 Google Scholar
[6]	Jalan B, Stemmer S 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 042106 Google Scholar
[7]	Ohta H, Kim S, Mune Y, Mizoguchi T, Nomura K, Ohta S, Nomura T, Nakanishi Y, Ikuhara Y, Hirano M, Hosono H, Koumoto K 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 129 Google Scholar
[8]	Pu J, Kanahashi K, Cuong N T, Chen C H, Li L J, Okada S, Ohta H, Takenobu T 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 014312 Google Scholar
[9]	Li P, Li L, Zeng X C 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 3106 Google Scholar
[10]	Zhang X, Liu B, Liu S, Li J, Liu R, Wang P, Dong Q, Li S, Tian H, Li Q, Liu B 2021 J. Alloys Compd. 867 158923 Google Scholar
[11]	Wang N, Li M, Xiao H, Gong H, Liu Z, Zu X, Qiao L 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 15097 Google Scholar
[12]	Xu R, Huang J, Barnard E S, Hong S S, Singh P, Wong E K, Jansen T, Harbola V, Xiao J, Wang B Y, Crossley S, Lu D, Liu S, Hwang H Y 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 3141 Google Scholar
[13]	Dong Z, Chen H, Qi M, Shen J, Liu W, Guo E, Li D, Zhang Y, Wu Z 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2100454 Google Scholar
[14]	Tikhomirov O, Jiang H, Levy J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 147601 Google Scholar
[15]	Haeni J H, Irvin P, Chang W, Uecker R, Reiche P, Li Y L, Choudhury S, Tian W, Hawley M E, Craigo B, Tagantsev A K, Pan X Q, Streiffer S K, Chen L Q, Kirchoefer S W, Levy J, Schlom D G 2004 Nature 430 758 Google Scholar
[16]	Bhansali S, Khunsin W, Chatterjee A, Santiso J, Abad B, Martin-Gonzalez M, Jakob G, Sotomayor Torres C M, Chávez-Angel E 2019 Nanoscale Adv. 1 3647 Google Scholar
[17]	Janotti A, Steiauf D, Van de Walle C G 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 201304 Google Scholar
[18]	Bellucci A, Mastellone M, Girolami M, Orlando S, Medici L, Mezzi A, Kaciulis S, Polini R, Trucchi D M 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 418 589 Google Scholar
[19]	Venkatasubramanian R, Siivola E, Colpitts T, O’Quinn B 2001 Nature 413 597 Google Scholar
[20]	Chen Z J, Zhou B Y, Li J X, Wen C L 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 386 389 Google Scholar
[21]	Varghese T, Hollar C, Richardson J, Kempf N, Han C, Gamarachchi P, Estrada D, Mehta R J, Zhang Y 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 33135 Google Scholar
[22]	Wunderlich W, Ohta H, Koumoto K 2009 Phys. B Condens. Matter 404 2202 Google Scholar
[23]	Benthem K, Elsässer C, French R H 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 90 6156 Google Scholar
[24]	Apreutesei M, Debord R, Bouras M, Regreny P, Botella C, Benamrouche A, Carretero-Genevrier A, Gazquez J, Grenet G, Pailhès S, Saint-Girons G, Bachelet R 2017 Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18 430 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhao T, Lu H B, Chen F, Dai S Y, Yang G Z, Chen Z H 2000 J. Cryst. Growth 212 451 Google Scholar
[26]	Kumar S R S, Barasheed A Z, Alshareef H N 2013 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5 7268 Google Scholar
[27]	Blennow P, Hagen A, Hansen K, Wallenberg L, Mogensen M 2008 Solid State Ion. 179 2047 Google Scholar
[28]	Chan N H, Sharma R K, Smyth D M 1981 J. Electrochem. Soc. 128 1762 Google Scholar
[29]	Culbertson C M, Flak A T, Yatskin M, Cheong P H Y, Cann D P, Dolgos M R 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 3729 Google Scholar
[30]	Chatterjee A, Lan Z, Christensen D V, Bauitti F, Morata A, Chavez-Angel E, Sanna S, Castelli I E, Chen Y, Tarancon A, Pryds N 2022 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 3741 Google Scholar
[31]	Ohtomo A, Hwang H Y 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 1716 Google Scholar
[32]	Hicks L D, Dresselhaus M S 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 12727 Google Scholar
[33]	许静, 何梓民, 杨文龙, 吴荣, 赖晓芳, 简基康 2022 物理学报 71 197301 Google Scholar Xu J, He Z M, Yang W L, Wu R, Lai X F, Jian J K 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 197301 Google Scholar
[34]	Matthews J, Blakeslee A 1974 J. Cryst. Growth 27 118 Google Scholar
[35]	Wang T, Ganguly K, Marshall P, Xu P, Jalan B 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 212904 Google Scholar
[36]	Zou D, Liu Y, Xie S, Lin J, Li J 2013 Chem. Phys. Lett. 586 159 Google Scholar

[1]	郑建军, 张丽萍. 单层Cu₂X的热电性质. 物理学报, 2023, 72(8): 086301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222015
[2]	陈赟斐, 魏锋, 王赫, 赵未昀, 邓元. 高性能Bi₂Te_3–xSe_x热电薄膜的可控生长. 物理学报, 2021, 70(20): 207303. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211090
[3]	杨亮亮, 秦源浩, 魏江涛, 宋培帅, 张明亮, 杨富华, 王晓东. 硒化亚铜薄膜热电性能研究进展. 物理学报, 2021, 70(7): 076802. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201677
[4]	王娇, 刘少辉, 周梦, 郝好山. 抗坏血酸后处理化学气相法制备的聚3, 4-乙撑二氧噻吩薄膜及其热电性能. 物理学报, 2020, 69(14): 147201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200431
[5]	王娇, 刘少辉, 周梦, 郝好山, 翟继卫. 钛酸锶纳米纤维表面羟基化处理对聚偏氟乙烯复合材料介电性能和储能性能的影响. 物理学报, 2020, 69(21): 218101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200592
[6]	刘冉, 高琳洁, 李龙江, 翟胜军, 王江龙, 傅广生, 王淑芳. Ca2+掺杂对CdO多晶热电性能的影响. 物理学报, 2015, 64(21): 218101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.218101
[7]	韦庞, 李康, 冯硝, 欧云波, 张立果, 王立莉, 何珂, 马旭村, 薛其坤. 在预刻蚀的衬底上通过分子束外延直接生长出拓扑绝缘体薄膜的微器件. 物理学报, 2014, 63(2): 027303. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.027303
[8]	薛将, 潘风明, 裴煜. 钽掺杂二氧化钛薄膜的光电性能研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 158103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.158103
[9]	徐韵, 李云鹏, 金璐, 马向阳, 杨德仁. 脉冲激光沉积法制备的ZnO薄膜的低阈值电抽运紫外随机激射. 物理学报, 2013, 62(8): 084207. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.084207
[10]	王伟, 唐佳伟, 王乐天, 陈小兵. 脉冲激光沉积法制备高温压电薄膜0.20 BiInO3-0.80PbTiO3（已撤稿）. 物理学报, 2013, 62(23): 237701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.237701
[11]	王淑芳, 陈珊珊, 陈景春, 闫国英, 乔小齐, 刘富强, 王江龙, 丁学成, 傅广生. 脉冲激光沉积温度及氧压对Bi2Sr2Co2Oy热电薄膜晶体结构与电输运性能的影响. 物理学报, 2012, 61(6): 066804. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.066804
[12]	李世帅, 冯秀鹏, 黄金昭, 刘春彦, 张仲, 陶冶微. Zn1-x-yNaxCoyO薄膜的脉冲激光沉积制备及表征. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 057105. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.057105
[13]	刘婷, 谈松林, 张辉, 秦毅, 张鹏翔. 氧压对SrTiO3和SrNb0.2Ti0.8O3薄膜晶格参数的影响及激光感生热电电压效应. 物理学报, 2008, 57(7): 4424-4427. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4424
[14]	李阳平, 刘正堂, 赵海龙, 刘文婷, 闫锋. GaP薄膜的射频磁控溅射沉积及其计算机模拟. 物理学报, 2007, 56(5): 2937-2944. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2937
[15]	张红鹰, 吴师岗. 飞秒激光作用下薄膜破坏的力学过程. 物理学报, 2007, 56(9): 5314-5317. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5314
[16]	夏志林, 范正修, 邵建达. 激光作用下薄膜中的电子-声子散射速率. 物理学报, 2006, 55(6): 3007-3012. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3007
[17]	唐秋文, 沈明荣, 方亮. 两种不同(Ba,Sr)TiO3薄膜介电-温度特性的研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(3): 1346-1350. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1346
[18]	刘元富, 韩建民, 张谷令, 王久丽, 陈光良, 李雪明, 冯文然, 范松华, 刘赤子, 杨思泽. 脉冲高能量密度等离子体沉积(Ti, Al)N薄膜组织及其性能研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(3): 1301-1305. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1301
[19]	刘震, 王淑芳, 赵嵩卿, 周岳亮. 利用脉冲激光沉积技术在双轴织构的Ni基带上外延CeO2薄膜. 物理学报, 2005, 54(12): 5820-5823. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5820
[20]	傅广生, 于威, 王淑芳, 李晓苇, 张连水, 韩理. 辉光放电等离子体辅助XeCl准分子激光溅射沉积碳氮薄膜. 物理学报, 2001, 50(11): 2263-2268. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2263

计量

文章访问数: 5915
PDF下载量: 162
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

应变增强Nb掺杂SrTiO₃薄膜热电性能