-
高分子的塌缩和临界吸附是高分子科学中的两个重要相变现象, 两者均伴随着高分子构象的显著变化 . 本文利用朗之万动力学方法和动力学Monte Carlo方法分别模拟了高分子的塌缩和临界吸附, 同时获得了不同温度下大量的高分子构象数据. 机器学习方法利用模拟得到的大量伸展无规线团态和塌缩液滴态、脱附态和吸附态构象数据训练神经网络, 学习高分子不同状态的特征, 快速准确地分析不同温度的高分子构象信息, 得到对应的塌缩相变温度和临界吸附温度. 结果表明机器学习能正确给出高分子体系的相变温度, 这为机器学习技术研究高分子的相变提供了新的思路和方法.Collapse and critical adsorption of polymers are two crucial phase transitions in polymer science, both are accompanied by significant changes in polymer conformation. In this paper, Langevin dynamics and dynamic Monte Carlo methods are used to simulate the collapse and critical adsorption of polymer, respectively, and corresponding phase transition temperatures are estimated. Meanwhile, a large number of polymer conformations at different temperatures are obtained. In the machine learning method, a large number of extended random coil and collapsed spherical, desorption and adsorption conformations are used to train the neural network, so that the neural network can learn the characteristics of different states of the polymer, and it can quickly and accurately analyze the polymer conformations at different temperatures and obtain the corresponding collapse phase transition temperature and critical adsorption temperature. The results demonstrate that machine learning can correctly calculate the phase transition temperature of polymer system, which provides new ideas and methods for machine learning technology in the study of polymer phase transitions.
-
Keywords:
- polymer /
- collapse /
- critical adsorption /
- machine learning
[1] Hinton G, Deng L, Yu D, et al. 2012 IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 29 82Google Scholar
[2] Silver D, Huang A, Maddison C J, et al. 2016 Nature 529 484Google Scholar
[3] Umehara M, Stein H S, Guevarra D, et al. 2019 NPJ Comput. Mater. 5 34Google Scholar
[4] Iwasaki Y, Takeuchi I, Stanev V, et al. 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 2751Google Scholar
[5] 陈江芷, 杨晨温, 任捷 2021 物理学报 70 144204Google Scholar
Chen J Z, Yang C W, Ren J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 144204Google Scholar
[6] Cencer M M, Moore J S, Assary R S 2022 Polym. Int. 71 537Google Scholar
[7] Zhang Y, Xu X 2021 J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 103 107796Google Scholar
[8] Liang Z, Li Z, Zhou S, et al. 2022 Cell Reports Physical Science 3 100931Google Scholar
[9] Zhang K, Li X, Jin Y, Jiang Y 2022 Soft Matter 18 6270Google Scholar
[10] Xu Y, Wang Z G 2021 Macromolecules 54 10984Google Scholar
[11] Milner S T 1991 Science 251 905Google Scholar
[12] Besteman K, Lee J O, Wiertz F G M, Heering H A, Dekker C 2003 Nano Lett. 3 727Google Scholar
[13] Duan X, Zhang R, Ding M, Huang Q, Xu W S, Shi T, An L 2017 Polymer 122 125Google Scholar
[14] Sumithra K, Brandau M, Straube E 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 130 234901Google Scholar
[15] Li Y W, Wüst T, Landau D P 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 012706Google Scholar
[16] Yang Q H, Wu F, Wang Q, Luo M B 2016 J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 54 2359Google Scholar
[17] Ziebarth J D, Gardiner A A, Wang Y M, Jeong Y, Ahn J, Jin Y, Chang T 2016 Macromolecules 49 8780Google Scholar
[18] Bhattacharya D, Patra T K 2021 Macromolecules 54 3065Google Scholar
[19] Nguyen T, Bavarian M 2022 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61 12690Google Scholar
[20] Weeks J D, Chandler D, Andersen H C 1971 J. Chem. Phys. 54 5237Google Scholar
[21] Chremos A, Glynos E, Koutsos V, Camp P J 2009 Soft Matter 5 637Google Scholar
[22] Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J A 1997 Neural Comput. 9 1735Google Scholar
[23] Loshchilov I, Hutter F 2017 arXiv:1711.05101 [cs.LG
[24] Luo M B, Tsehay D A, Sun L Z 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 034901Google Scholar
[25] Yang X, Wu F, Hu D D, Zhang S, Luo M B 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 098202Google Scholar
[26] Qi H K, Yang X, Yang Q H, Luo M B 2022 Polymer 259 125330Google Scholar
-
图 4 高分子均方回转半径$ \left\langle{{R}_{{\mathrm{G}}}^{2}}\right\rangle $与温度T的关系的朗之万动力学模拟结果. 插图给出了$ \left\langle{{R}_{{\mathrm{G}}}^{2}}\right\rangle $对T的导数与T的关系
Fig. 4. Simulation results of the mean square radius of gyration $ \left\langle{{R}_{{\mathrm{G}}}^{2}}\right\rangle $ versus temperature T. The inset presents the $ \left\langle{{R}_{{\mathrm{G}}}^{2}}\right\rangle $ derivative of T in relation to T.
图 5 高分子平方回转半径$ {R}_{{\mathrm{G}}}^{2} $在温度T = 0.01 (a), 0.5 (b)和3.2 (c)的概率分布. 插图分别给出了T = 0.01 和 3.2 时高分子的典型构象
Fig. 5. Plots of the probability distribution of square radius of gyration $ {R}_{{\mathrm{G}}}^{2} $ for polymer at temperatures T = 0.01 (a), 0.5 (b), and 3.2 (c). The insets show the typical polymer conformations at T = 0.01 and 3.2.
图 7 高分子吸附链节数涨落$ {\sigma }_{\rm M}^{2} $与温度T的关系的动力学Monte Carlo模拟结果. 插图给出了高温的非吸附态和低温的吸附态高分子构象
Fig. 7. Plot of the fluctuation of adsorption monomer number $ {\sigma }_{\rm M}^{2} $ of polymer chain versus temperature T. The inset presents non-adsorbed polymer at high temperature and adsorbed polymer at low temperature.
图 10 机器学习得到的吸附态概率PA在(0, 0.2), (0.2, 0.8)和(0.8, 1)三个范围内高分子构象相对于构象的吸附数M和链质心高度zc的分布
Fig. 10. Distribution of polymer conformation relative to the adsorbed number M and the mean height zc for the adsorption probability PA obtained by machine learning in three ranges of (0, 0.2), (0.2, 0.8) and (0.8, 1).
-
[1] Hinton G, Deng L, Yu D, et al. 2012 IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 29 82Google Scholar
[2] Silver D, Huang A, Maddison C J, et al. 2016 Nature 529 484Google Scholar
[3] Umehara M, Stein H S, Guevarra D, et al. 2019 NPJ Comput. Mater. 5 34Google Scholar
[4] Iwasaki Y, Takeuchi I, Stanev V, et al. 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 2751Google Scholar
[5] 陈江芷, 杨晨温, 任捷 2021 物理学报 70 144204Google Scholar
Chen J Z, Yang C W, Ren J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 144204Google Scholar
[6] Cencer M M, Moore J S, Assary R S 2022 Polym. Int. 71 537Google Scholar
[7] Zhang Y, Xu X 2021 J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 103 107796Google Scholar
[8] Liang Z, Li Z, Zhou S, et al. 2022 Cell Reports Physical Science 3 100931Google Scholar
[9] Zhang K, Li X, Jin Y, Jiang Y 2022 Soft Matter 18 6270Google Scholar
[10] Xu Y, Wang Z G 2021 Macromolecules 54 10984Google Scholar
[11] Milner S T 1991 Science 251 905Google Scholar
[12] Besteman K, Lee J O, Wiertz F G M, Heering H A, Dekker C 2003 Nano Lett. 3 727Google Scholar
[13] Duan X, Zhang R, Ding M, Huang Q, Xu W S, Shi T, An L 2017 Polymer 122 125Google Scholar
[14] Sumithra K, Brandau M, Straube E 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 130 234901Google Scholar
[15] Li Y W, Wüst T, Landau D P 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 012706Google Scholar
[16] Yang Q H, Wu F, Wang Q, Luo M B 2016 J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 54 2359Google Scholar
[17] Ziebarth J D, Gardiner A A, Wang Y M, Jeong Y, Ahn J, Jin Y, Chang T 2016 Macromolecules 49 8780Google Scholar
[18] Bhattacharya D, Patra T K 2021 Macromolecules 54 3065Google Scholar
[19] Nguyen T, Bavarian M 2022 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61 12690Google Scholar
[20] Weeks J D, Chandler D, Andersen H C 1971 J. Chem. Phys. 54 5237Google Scholar
[21] Chremos A, Glynos E, Koutsos V, Camp P J 2009 Soft Matter 5 637Google Scholar
[22] Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J A 1997 Neural Comput. 9 1735Google Scholar
[23] Loshchilov I, Hutter F 2017 arXiv:1711.05101 [cs.LG
[24] Luo M B, Tsehay D A, Sun L Z 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 034901Google Scholar
[25] Yang X, Wu F, Hu D D, Zhang S, Luo M B 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 098202Google Scholar
[26] Qi H K, Yang X, Yang Q H, Luo M B 2022 Polymer 259 125330Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 2437
- PDF下载量: 111
- 被引次数: 0