搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

用于铯原子里德伯态激发的509 nm波长脉冲激光系统

刘瑶 何军 苏楠 蔡婷 刘智慧 刁文婷 王军民

引用本文:
Citation:

用于铯原子里德伯态激发的509 nm波长脉冲激光系统

刘瑶, 何军, 苏楠, 蔡婷, 刘智慧, 刁文婷, 王军民

A 509 nm pulsed laser system for Rydberg excitation of cesium atoms

Liu Yao, He Jun, Su Nan, Cai Ting, Liu Zhi-Hui, Diao Wen-Ting, Wang Jun-Min
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 介绍了一种用于里德伯原子激发的纳秒脉冲激光系统. 实验利用两个kHz线宽的1018 nm连续激光器作为种子源, 通过两个20 GHz带宽的光纤调制器产生时间分离的脉冲激光; 脉冲激光经掺镱光纤放大器后输出峰值功率约4600 W, 单次穿过PPLN(周期极化铌酸锂)晶体倍频获得509 nm脉冲激光, 典型脉冲激光峰值功率约173 W. 该激光系统单路输出脉冲重复频率在300 kHz—100 MHz范围连续可调, 脉宽在1—100 ns范围连续可调. 该509 nm激光在聚焦条件下可以实现GHz带宽的铯原子里德伯态激发.
    Single photon source is a non-classical light field with anti-bunching effect, which has a potential applications in the research of fundamental physics problems, quantum precision measurement, quantum communication, quantum computing, etc. The strong interaction between highly excited Rydberg atoms presents an excitation blockade effect. In a dense Rydberg atomic ensemble, the excitation of more than one Rydberg atom within a blockade volume is suppressed, where the interactions of Rydberg atoms shift the atomic states out of resonance with an excitation laser.We consider here the generation of single photon source by using a four-wave mixing scheme in a room-temperature atomic vapor cell. In a homemade micrometer-sized atomic vapor cell, one-dimensional size is smaller than the radius of Rydberg blockade and the other two-dimensional size is limited by the size of focused laser beam. The blockade radius is on the order of a few micrometers, depending on the Rydberg atom states. An excitation blockade effect can be used to realize single photon source in thermal cesium vapor microcells. The micron cesium-cell is used to spatially localize atomic groups, which results in the atomic decoherence time on the order of microseconds or even nanoseconds. This requires a high-power pulsed laser to prepare the Rydberg atomic state at a nanosecond scale.Four-photon excitation schemes with narrow linewidth lasers are also used experimentally. The cesium-Rydberg state can usually be excited by the lasers with optical wavelengths 852 and 509 nm, respectively. The laser system is well-stabilized so that the detuning is small compared with the spontaneous linewidth of Rydberg state, while the laser power and temporal mode need to be specified for ns-time coherence in thermal cesium vapor microcells. The 852 nm laser can be achieved by modulating the continuous laser beam with the help of an electro-optic intensity modulator (EOIM). While this remains a technical challenge for 509 nm laser with ns-laser pulse. There is no EOIM to generate the ns-laser pulse with high power.We demonstrate a novel generation method of 509 nm laser system. In our experiments, a 1018 nm fiber laser is used to produce a continuous laser with a typical linewidth of ~8 kHz and power of 10 mW. The nanosecond pulse is generated with the help of an electro-optic intensity modulator (EOIM) by modifying the continuous laser beam. The peak power of modulated optical pulse is amplified to 4600 W by using a homemade fiber amplifier. The output beam of 1018 nm is then injected into a periodically poled lithium-niobate (PPLN) to generate the second harmonics laser of 509 nm. The typical peak power of 509 nm reaches 173 W by optimizing PPLN phase matching parameters. The pulse repetition frequency of the 509 nm laser can be continuously tuned in a range of 300 kHz–100 MHz, and the pulse width can be continuously tuned in a range of 1–100 ns. Peak power fluctuation of the pulses is about 1.3%. The power 509 nm laser with optimized pulse parameters can be used to excite the cesium atom with GHz bandwidth. Meanwhile the two seed source lasers is well established experimentally, which allows alternating pulses with a different wavelength. This is an essential capability for realizing a single photon source through four-wave mixing.
      通信作者: 何军, hejun@sxu.edu.cn ; 刁文婷, dwt1124@163.com ; 王军民, wwjjmm@sxu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2021YFA1402002)、国家自然科学基金 (批准号: 61875111, 62071376)和山西省“1331工程”重点项目资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: He Jun, hejun@sxu.edu.cn ; Diao Wen-Ting, dwt1124@163.com ; Wang Jun-Min, wwjjmm@sxu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFA1402002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61875111, 62071376), and the “1331 Project”for Key Subject Construction of Shanxi Province, China.
    [1]

    Kimble H J, Dagenais M, Mandel L 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 691Google Scholar

    [2]

    Hessmo B, Usachev P, Heydari H, Björk G 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 180401Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lombardi E, Sciarrino F, Popescu S, Martini F D 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 070402Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145Google Scholar

    [5]

    Weber J R, Koehl W F, Varley J B, Janotti A, Buckley B B, Van de Walle C G, Awschalom D D 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 8513Google Scholar

    [6]

    Knill E, Laflamme R, Milburn G J 2001 Nature 409 46Google Scholar

    [7]

    Kok P, Munro W J, Nemoto K, Ralph T C, Dowling J P, Milburn G J 2007 Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 135Google Scholar

    [8]

    Michler P, Imamoğlu A, Mason M D, Carson P J, Strouse G F, Buratto S K 2000 Nature 406 968Google Scholar

    [9]

    Santori C, Pelton M, Solomon G, Dale Y, Yamamoto Y 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 1502Google Scholar

    [10]

    Klyshko D N, Sviridov Y 2018 Photons and Nonlinear Optics (London: Routledge)

    [11]

    Ramelow S, Mech A, Giustina M, Gröblacher S, Wieczorek W, Beyer J, Lita A, Calkins B, Gerrits T, Nam S W, Zeilinger A, Ursin R 2013 Opt. Express 21 6707Google Scholar

    [12]

    Ripka F, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T 2018 Science 362 446Google Scholar

    [13]

    Dudin Y O, Kuzmich A 2012 Science 336 887Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kölle A, Epple G, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 063821Google Scholar

    [15]

    Huber B, Kölle A, Pfau T 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 053806Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ripka F, Chen Y H, Löw R, Pfau T 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 053429Google Scholar

    [17]

    Jin G, Liu B, He J, Wang J M 2016 Appl. Phys. Express 9 072702Google Scholar

    [18]

    He J, Jin G, Liu B, Wang J M 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 5724Google Scholar

    [19]

    de Vries O, Plötner M, Christaller F, Zhang H, Belz A, Heinrich B, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T, Walbaum T, Schreiber T, Tünnermann A 2020 Opt. Express 28 17362Google Scholar

    [20]

    Poem E, Golenchenko A, Davidson O, Arenfrid O, Finkelstein R, Firstenberg O 2020 Opt. Express 28 32738Google Scholar

  • 图 1  基于铯原子四波混频的单光子源能级结构示意图. 两个频差GHz的509 nm脉冲激光用于实现四波混频过程的里德伯态激发

    Fig. 1.  Schematic diagram of single-photon source energy level structure based on four-wave mixing of cesium atoms. Two 509 nm pulsed lasers with a frequency difference of GHz are used to achieve Rydberg state excitation in a four-wave mixing process.

    图 2  脉冲激光器示意图. 种子源激光为连续输出的光纤激光器, 输出激光经电光强度调制器 EOIM 1或EOIM 2产生纳秒脉冲激光, 脉冲激光输入光纤放大器PA进行功率放大, 放大后激光输入PPLN晶体进行倍频(SHG), 获得509 nm脉冲激光. Laser 1017.5 nm, Laser 1017.8 nm分别为种子源1和种子源2; EOIM 1和EOIM 2分别为Mach-Zehnder型电光强度调制器; PA为掺镱保偏光纤放大器; SHG为倍频器; Monitor 1, Monitor 2分别为两个种子源的监测端口; Monitor 3为EOIM输出的激光参数监测端口

    Fig. 2.  Schematic diagram of pulsed laser. The seed source laser is a fiber laser with continuous output. The output laser generates nanosecond pulse laser through the electro-optical intensity modulator EOIM 1 or EOIM 2. The pulse laser is input into the fiber amplifier PA for power amplification. Laser 1017.5 nm and Laser 1017.8 nm are seed sources 1 and 2, respectively. EOIM 1 and EOIM 2 are Mach-Zehnder electro-optical intensity modulators, respectively. PA, ytterbium-doped polarization-maintaining fiber amplifier; SHG, frequency multiplier. Monitor 1 and Monitor 2 are monitoring ports for the two seed sources respectively. Monitor 3 is the port that monitors laser parameters output by EOIM.

    图 3  电脉冲和光脉冲实验测量信号 (a) 光脉冲信号; (b) 电脉冲信号, 重复频率1 MHz、脉宽10 ns. 光脉冲重复频率与脉冲宽度是与电脉冲信号一致, 其中, 脉冲峰值功率起伏约1.3%

    Fig. 3.  Experimental measurement signal of electrical pulse and optical pulse: (a) Optical pulse signal; (b) electrical pulse signal, the pulse repetition frequency is 1 MHz, the pulse width is 10 ns. The optical pulse repetition frequency and pulse width are consistent with the electrical pulse signal, in which the peak pulse power fluctuates about 1.3%.

    图 4  509 nm脉冲激光的倍频温度匹配曲线, 在重复频率1 MHz、脉宽为5 ns参数条件下, 最佳匹配温度为69.82 ℃, 倍频转换效率为16%

    Fig. 4.  Matching curve of frequency doubling temperature of 509 nm pulsed laser. Under the conditions of pulse repetition frequency of 1 MHz and pulse width of 5 ns, the optimal matching temperature is 69.82 ℃, and the conversion efficiency of frequency doubling is 16%.

    图 5  (a) 倍频光输出峰值功率随基频光平均功率的变化; (b) 基频光平均功率和倍频效率之间的关系

    Fig. 5.  (a) Curve of peak power of the 509 nm pulsed laser with the average power of 1018 nm pulsed laser; (b) the efficiency vs. the average power of 1018 nm pulsed laser.

    图 6  509 nm脉冲序列图 (a) 509 nm和(b) 1018 nm光脉冲信号; (c) EOIM电脉冲信号; 插图为典型脉冲的放大显示, 典型重复频率1 MHz、脉宽10 ns. 光脉冲重复频率与脉冲宽度是与电脉冲信号一致

    Fig. 6.  The 509 nm pulse sequence: (a) 509 nm optical pulse signal; (b) 1018 nm optical pulse signal; (c) EOIM electrical pulse signal; the inset is typical pulse amplification display. Typical pulse repetition frequency is 1 MHz, pulse width is 10 ns. The optical pulse repetition frequency and pulse width are consistent with the electrical pulse signal.

    图 7  509 nm脉冲激光的峰值功率随脉宽的变化

    Fig. 7.  Peak power of 509 nm pulsed laser varies with the pulse width.

    图 8  509 nm 脉冲激光的峰值功率随重复频率的变化

    Fig. 8.  Peak power of 509 nm pulsed laser varies with the pulse repetition frequency.

    图 9  铯原子 $ 6{{\rm{P}}}_{3/2}\to 50{{\rm{S}}}_{1/2}, 6{{\rm{P}}}_{3/2}\to 50{{\rm{D}}}_{3/2} $跃迁Rabi频率随509 nm脉冲激光峰值功率的变化

    Fig. 9.  The $ 6{{\rm{P}}}_{3/2}\to 50{{\rm{S}}}_{1/2} $, $ 6{{\rm{P}}}_{3/2}\to 50{{\rm{D}}}_{3/2} $ transition Rabi frequency vs. peak power of 509 nm pulsed laser.

  • [1]

    Kimble H J, Dagenais M, Mandel L 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 691Google Scholar

    [2]

    Hessmo B, Usachev P, Heydari H, Björk G 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 180401Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lombardi E, Sciarrino F, Popescu S, Martini F D 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 070402Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145Google Scholar

    [5]

    Weber J R, Koehl W F, Varley J B, Janotti A, Buckley B B, Van de Walle C G, Awschalom D D 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 8513Google Scholar

    [6]

    Knill E, Laflamme R, Milburn G J 2001 Nature 409 46Google Scholar

    [7]

    Kok P, Munro W J, Nemoto K, Ralph T C, Dowling J P, Milburn G J 2007 Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 135Google Scholar

    [8]

    Michler P, Imamoğlu A, Mason M D, Carson P J, Strouse G F, Buratto S K 2000 Nature 406 968Google Scholar

    [9]

    Santori C, Pelton M, Solomon G, Dale Y, Yamamoto Y 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 1502Google Scholar

    [10]

    Klyshko D N, Sviridov Y 2018 Photons and Nonlinear Optics (London: Routledge)

    [11]

    Ramelow S, Mech A, Giustina M, Gröblacher S, Wieczorek W, Beyer J, Lita A, Calkins B, Gerrits T, Nam S W, Zeilinger A, Ursin R 2013 Opt. Express 21 6707Google Scholar

    [12]

    Ripka F, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T 2018 Science 362 446Google Scholar

    [13]

    Dudin Y O, Kuzmich A 2012 Science 336 887Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kölle A, Epple G, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 063821Google Scholar

    [15]

    Huber B, Kölle A, Pfau T 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 053806Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ripka F, Chen Y H, Löw R, Pfau T 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 053429Google Scholar

    [17]

    Jin G, Liu B, He J, Wang J M 2016 Appl. Phys. Express 9 072702Google Scholar

    [18]

    He J, Jin G, Liu B, Wang J M 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 5724Google Scholar

    [19]

    de Vries O, Plötner M, Christaller F, Zhang H, Belz A, Heinrich B, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T, Walbaum T, Schreiber T, Tünnermann A 2020 Opt. Express 28 17362Google Scholar

    [20]

    Poem E, Golenchenko A, Davidson O, Arenfrid O, Finkelstein R, Firstenberg O 2020 Opt. Express 28 32738Google Scholar

  • [1] 张学超, 乔佳慧, 刘瑶, 苏楠, 刘智慧, 蔡婷, 何军, 赵延霆, 王军民. 基于里德伯原子天线的低频电场波形测量. 物理学报, 2024, 73(7): 070201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231778
    [2] 余桂芳, 李志浩, 肖天琦, 冯田峰, 周晓祺. 基于薄膜铌酸锂的模式色散相位匹配单光子源. 物理学报, 2023, 72(15): 154204. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230743
    [3] 王鑫, 任飞帆, 韩嵩, 韩海燕, 严冬. 里德伯原子辅助光力系统的完美光力诱导透明及慢光效应. 物理学报, 2023, 72(9): 094203. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222264
    [4] 白健男, 韩嵩, 陈建弟, 韩海燕, 严冬. 超级里德伯原子间的稳态关联集体激发与量子纠缠. 物理学报, 2023, 72(12): 124202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222030
    [5] 王勤霞, 王志辉, 刘岩鑫, 管世军, 何军, 张鹏飞, 李刚, 张天才. 腔增强热里德伯原子光谱. 物理学报, 2023, 72(8): 087801. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230039
    [6] 林沂, 吴逢川, 毛瑞棋, 姚佳伟, 刘燚, 安强, 付云起. 三端口光纤耦合原子气室探头的开发及其微波数字通信应用. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 170702. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220594
    [7] 姚杰, 赵爱迪. 表面单分子量子态的探测和调控研究进展. 物理学报, 2022, 71(6): 060701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212324
    [8] 高洁, 杭超. 里德伯原子中非厄米电磁诱导光栅引起的弱光孤子偏折及其操控. 物理学报, 2022, 71(13): 133202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220456
    [9] 吴逢川, 林沂, 武博, 付云起. 里德伯原子的射频脉冲响应特性. 物理学报, 2022, 71(20): 207402. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220972
    [10] 金钊, 李芮, 公卫江, 祁阳, 张寿, 苏石磊. 基于共振里德伯偶极-偶极相互作用的双反阻塞机制及量子逻辑门的实现. 物理学报, 2021, 70(13): 134202. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210059
    [11] 高小苹, 梁景睿, 刘堂昆, 李宏, 刘继兵. 巨梯型四能级里德伯原子系统透射光谱性质的调控. 物理学报, 2021, 70(11): 113201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202077
    [12] 赵嘉栋, 张好, 杨文广, 赵婧华, 景明勇, 张临杰. 基于里德伯原子电磁诱导透明效应的光脉冲减速. 物理学报, 2021, 70(10): 103201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210102
    [13] 严冬, 王彬彬, 白文杰, 刘兵, 杜秀国, 任春年. 里德伯电磁感应透明中的相位. 物理学报, 2019, 68(8): 084203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181938
    [14] 张尧, 张杨, 董振超. 单分子尺度的光量子态调控与单分子电致发光研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(22): 223301. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181718
    [15] 张秦榕, 王彬彬, 张孟龙, 严冬. 稀薄里德伯原子气体中的两体纠缠. 物理学报, 2018, 67(3): 034202. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172052
    [16] 王锋, 陈天江, 雒仲祥, 鲁燕华, 万敏, 彭博, 尹新启. 基于长脉冲光源的钠信标回光特性实验研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(1): 014208. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.014208
    [17] 韩清瑶, 汤俊超, 张弨, 王川, 马海强, 于丽, 焦荣珍. 局域态密度对表面等离激元特性影响的研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(13): 135202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.135202
    [18] 马海强, 李林霞, 王素梅, 吴张斌, 焦荣珍. 一种全光纤型观测光波粒二象性的方法. 物理学报, 2010, 59(1): 75-79. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.75
    [19] 马海强, 王素梅, 吴令安. 基于偏振纠缠光子对的单光子源. 物理学报, 2009, 58(2): 717-721. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.717
    [20] 赵建明, 张临杰, 李昌勇, 贾锁堂. 里德伯原子向超冷等离子体的自发转化. 物理学报, 2008, 57(5): 2895-2898. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2895
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2567
  • PDF下载量:  81
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-30
  • 修回日期:  2022-12-27
  • 上网日期:  2023-01-12
  • 刊出日期:  2023-03-20

/

返回文章
返回