Mg2Si0.3Sn0.7掺杂Ag和Li的热电性能对比

袁国才; 陈曦; 黄雨阳; 毛俊西; 禹劲秋; 雷晓波; 张勤勇

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20190247

摘要

采用两步固相法合成了物相均匀的Mg_2(1–x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05)和Mg_2(1–y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7 (y = 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08)热电材料, 测试了室温物理性能和室温至773 K的热电性能, 研究了不同掺杂剂的固溶度、微观结构、载流子浓度、电性能和热输运. X射线衍射图谱和扫描电子显微镜图像显示掺杂Ag和Li的固溶度分别为x = 0.03和y = 0.06. 根据单抛物线模型, p型的Mg_2(1–x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7和Mg_2(1–y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7的有效质量为1.2m₀. 对比结果表明: 掺杂Ag或Li的最大载流子浓度分别达到4.64 × 10¹⁹ cm^–3和15.1 × 10¹⁹ cm^–3; 掺杂Li元素的样品有较高的固溶度、较高的载流子浓度和较高的功率因子PF约为1.62 × 10^–3 W·m^–1·K^–2; 掺杂Li元素样品中较高的载流子浓度能够有效抑制双极效应, 显著降低双极热导率; Mg_1.92Li_0.08Si_0.3Sn_0.7的最大ZT值0.54, 比Mg_1.9Ag_0.1Si_0.3Sn_0.7的最大ZT值0.34提高了大约58%. 根据Callaway理论, 由于质量场波动和应变场波动增强声子散射, 掺杂Ag和Li元素样品的晶格热导率比未掺杂样品明显降低.

关键词:

Abstract

In recent decades, Mg₂(Si, Sn) solid solutions have long been considered as one of the most important classes of eco-friendly thermoelectric materials. The thermoelectric performance of Mg₂(Si, Sn) solid solutions with outstanding characteristics of low-price, non-toxicity, earth-abundant and low-density has been widely studied. The n-type Mg₂(Si, Sn) solid solutions have achieved the dimensionless thermoelectric figure of merit ZT ~1.4 through Bi/Sb doping and convergence of conduction bands. However, the thermoelectric performances for p-type Mg₂(Si, Sn) solid solutions are mainly improved by optimizing the carrier concentration. In this work, the thermoelectric properties for p-type Mg₂Si_0.3Sn_0.7 are investigated and compared with those for different p-type dopant Ag or Li. The homogeneous Mg₂Si_0.3Sn_0.7 with Ag or Li doping is synthesized by two-step solid-state reaction method at temperatures of 873 K and 973 K for 24 h, respectively. The transport parameters and the thermoelectric properties are measured at temperatures ranging from room temperature to 773 K for Mg_2(1–x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05) and Mg_2(1–y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7 (y = 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08) samples. The influences of different dopants on solid solubility, microstructure, carrier concentration, electrical properties and thermal transport are also investigated. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show that the solid solubility for Ag and for Li are x = 0.03 and y = 0.06, respectively. Based on the assumption of single parabolic band model, the value of effective mass ~1.2m₀ of p-type Mg_2(1–x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7 and Mg_2(1–y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7 are similar to that reported in the literature. The comparative results demonstrate that the maximum carrier concentration for Ag doping and for Li doping are 4.64×10¹⁹ cm^–3 for x = 0.01 and 15.1×10¹⁹ cm^–3 for y = 0.08 at room temperature, respectively; the Li element has higher solid solubility in Mg₂(Si, Sn), which leads to higher carrier concentration and power factor PF ~1.62×10^–3 ${\rm W}\cdot{\rm m^{–1}}\cdot{\rm K^{–2}}$ in Li doped samples; the higher carrier concentration of Li doped samples effectively suppresses the bipolar effect; the maximum of ZT ~0.54 for Mg_1.92Li_0.08Si_0.3Sn_0.7 is 58% higher than that of Mg_1.9Ag_0.1Si_0.3Sn_0.7 samples. The lattice thermal conductivity of Li or Ag doped sample decreases obviously due to the stronger mass and strain field fluctuations in phonon transport.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
西华大学材料科学与工程学院, 成都　610039

2.
西华大学西华学院, 成都　610039

通信作者: 张勤勇, zhangqy@mail.xhu.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 51572226)、四川省科技支撑计划(批准号: 2015GZ0060)和国家创新创业训练项目(批准号: 201710623)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China

2.
Xihua Honor College, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China

Corresponding author: Zhang Qin-Yong, zhangqy@mail.xhu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51572226), the Science and Technology Foundation of Sichuan Province, China (Grant No. 2015GZ0060), and the Chinese Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Project (Grant No. 201710623).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Dresselhaus M S, Chen G, Tang M Y, Yang R G, Lee H, Wang D Z, Ren Z F, Fleurial J P, Gogna P 2007 Adv. Mater. 19 1043 Google Scholar
[2]	Snyder G J, Toberer E S 2008 Nat. Mater. 7 105 Google Scholar
[3]	Bell L E 2008 Science 321 1457 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhu T, Liu Y, Fu C, Heremans J P, Snyder G J, Zhao X 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1605884 Google Scholar
[5]	朱航天, 任武洋, 张勤勇, 任志锋 2018 西华大学学报(自然科学版) 37 15 Google Scholar Zhu H T, Ren W Y, Zhang Q Y, Ren Z F 2018 J. Xihua Univ. (Natural Science Edition) 37 15 Google Scholar
[6]	Pei Y, Shi X, Lalonde A, Wang H, Chen L, Snyder G J 2011 Nature 473 66 Google Scholar
[7]	Mao J, Wang Y, Ge B, Jie Q, Liu Z, Saparamadu U, Liu W, Ren Z 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 20726 Google Scholar
[8]	Lu Q, Wu M, Wu D, Chang C, Guo Y P, Zhou C S, Li W, Ma X M, Wang G, Zhao L D, Huang L, Liu C, He J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 116401 Google Scholar
[9]	Pei Y, Lalonde A D, Wang H, Snyder G J 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 7963 Google Scholar
[10]	张勤勇, 袁国才, 王俊臣, 毛俊西, 雷晓波 2018 西华大学学报(自然科学版) 37 1 Google Scholar Zhang Q Y, Yuan G C, Wang J C, Mao J X, Lei X B 2018 J. Xihua Univ. (Natural Science Edition) 37 1 Google Scholar
[11]	Paul B, Ajay Kumar V, Banerji P 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 064322 Google Scholar
[12]	Xie W J, Yan Y G, Zhu S, Zhou M, Populoh S, Gałązka K, Poon S J, Weidenkaff A, He J, Tang X F, Tritt T M 2013 Acta Mater. 61 2087 Google Scholar
[13]	Heremans J P, Wiendlocha B, Chamoire A M 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 5510 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhang Q, Wang H, Liu W, Wang H, Yu B, Zhang Q, Tian Z, Ni G, Lee S, Esfarjani K, Chen G, Ren Z 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 5246 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhou B Q, Li S, Li W, Li J, Zhang X Y, Lin S Q, Chen Z W, Pei Y Z 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 34033 Google Scholar
[16]	Xiao Y, Wu H, Li W, Yin M, Pei Y, Zhang Y, Fu L, Chen Y, Pennycook S J, Huang L, He J, Zhao L D 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 18732 Google Scholar
[17]	王浚臣, 袁国才, 禹劲秋, 莫小波, 金应荣, 黄丽宏 2018 西华大学学报(自然科学版) 37 68 Google Scholar Wang J C, Yuan G C, Yu J Q, Mo X B, Jin Y R, Huang L H 2018 Journal of Xihua University (Natural Science Edition) 37 68 Google Scholar
[18]	de Boor J, Dasgupta T, Saparamadu U, Müller E, Ren Z F 2017 Mater. Today Energy 4 105 Google Scholar
[19]	Bashir M B A, Mohd Said S, Sabri M F M, Shnawah D A, Elsheikh M H 2014 Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37 569 Google Scholar
[20]	Santos R, Aminorroaya Yamini S, Dou S X 2018 J. Mater. Chem. A 6 3328 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu W, Yin K, Zhang Q, Uher C, Tang X 2017 Nat. Sci. Rev. 4 611 Google Scholar
[22]	Pulikkotil J J, Singh D J, Auluck S, Saravanan M, Misra D K, Dhar A, Budhani R C 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 155204 Google Scholar
[23]	Sun J, Singh D J 2016 Phys. Rev. Appl. 5 024006 Google Scholar
[24]	Tani J I, Kido H 2008 Intermetallics 16 418 Google Scholar
[25]	Tani J I, Kido H 2012 Physica B 407 3493 Google Scholar
[26]	Imai Y, Mori Y, Nakamura S, Takarabe K I 2013 J. Alloys Compd. 549 175 Google Scholar
[27]	Tani J I, Kido H 2008 J. Alloys Compd. 466 335 Google Scholar
[28]	Zhang Q, He J, Zhao X B, Zhang S N, Zhu T J, Yin H, Tritt T M 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 185103 Google Scholar
[29]	Luo W J, Yang M J, Fei C, Shen Q, Jiang H G, Zhang L M 2010 Mater. Trans. 51 288 Google Scholar
[30]	Liu W, Tang X, Li H, Yin K, Sharp J, Zhou X, Uher C 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 13653 Google Scholar
[31]	Ihou-Mouko H, Mercier C, Tobola J, Pont G, Scherrer H 2011 J. Alloys Compd. 509 6503 Google Scholar
[32]	Tada S, Isoda Y, Udono H, Fujiu H, Kumagai S, Shinohara Y 2014 J. Electron. Mater. 43 1580
[33]	Zhang Q, Cheng L, Liu W, Zheng Y, Su X, Chi H, Liu H, Yan Y, Tang X, Uher C 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 23576 Google Scholar
[34]	Tang X, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Peng K, Huang T, Lu X, Wang G, Wang S, Zhou X 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng. 111 1396 Google Scholar
[35]	Yin K, Zhang Q, Zheng Y, Su X, Tang X, Uher C 2015 J. Mater. Chem. C 3 10381 Google Scholar
[36]	Liu W, Chi H, Sun H, Zhang Q, Yin K, Tang X, Zhang Q, Uher C 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 6893 Google Scholar
[37]	de Boor J, Saparamadu U, Mao J, Dahal K, Müller E, Ren Z 2016 Acta Mater. 120 273 Google Scholar
[38]	Saparamadu U, de Boor J, Mao J, Song S, Tian F, Liu W, Zhang Q, Ren Z 2017 Acta Mater. 141 154 Google Scholar
[39]	Gao P, Davis J D, Poltavets V V, Hogan T P 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 929 Google Scholar
[40]	Tang X, Wang G, Zheng Y, Zhang Y, Peng K, Guo L, Wang S, Zeng M, Dai J, Wang G, Zhou X 2016 Scripta Mater. 115 52 Google Scholar
[41]	Kim H S, Gibbs Z M, Tang Y, Wang H, Snyder G J 2015 APL Mater. 3 041506 Google Scholar
[42]	Yang J, Meisner G P, Chen L 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 1140 Google Scholar
[43]	覃玉婷, 仇鹏飞, 史迅, 陈立东 2017 无机材料学报 32 1171 Qin Y T, Qiu P F, Shi X, Chen L D 2017 J. Inorg. Mater. 32 1171
[44]	Slack G A 1957 Phys. Rev. 105 832 Google Scholar
[45]	Abeles B 1963 Phys. Rev. 131 1906 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 Mg_2(1－x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05)和Mg_2(1－y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ y ≤ 0.08)的XRD图谱(a), (c)与晶格常数(b), (d)

Fig. 1. XRD patterns (a), (c) and lattice constant (b), (d) of Mg_2(1－x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05) and Mg_2(1－y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 0.08)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 (a), (b), (c)分别为Mg₂Si_0.3Sn_0.7, Mg_1.9Ag_0.1Si_0.3Sn_0.7，Mg_1.92Li_0.08Si_0.3Sn_0.7的SEM图像; (d) Mg_1.92Li_0.08Si_0.3Sn_0.7的背散射图像

Fig. 2. (a), (b) and (c) are SEM images of Mg₂Si_0.3Sn_0.7, Mg_1.9Ag_0.1Si_0.3Sn_0.7, and Mg_1.92Li_0.08Si_0.3Sn_0.7; (d) the back scattered electron image of Mg_1.92Li_0.08Si_0.3Sn_0.7

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 Seebeck系数S与载流子浓度p之间的Pisarenko关系

Fig. 3. The Pisarenko plot between Seebeck coefficient S and carrier concentration p

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 (a)—(f) Mg_2(1－x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05)和Mg_2(1－y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ y ≤ 0.08)的电导率、Seebeck系数和功率因子与温度的关系

Fig. 4. The temperature dependence of (a), (d) electrical conductivity, (b), (e) Seebeck coefficient and (c), (f) power factor for Mg_2(1－x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05) and Mg_2(1－y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 0.08)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 (a)—(f) Mg_2(1－x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05)和Mg_2(1－y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ y ≤ 0.08)的热导率, 晶格热导率和ZT值与温度的关系图

Fig. 5. The temperature dependence of (a), (d) thermal conductivity, (b), (e) lattice thermal conductivity and (c), (f) ZT for Mg_2(1－x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05) and Mg_2(1－y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ y ≤ 0.08)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 Mg₂Si_0.3Sn_0.7的掺杂Ag和Li浓度与质量场波动散射因子Γ_M和应变场波动散射因子Γ_S的关系

Fig. 6. The relation of (a) the mass fluctuation scattering parameter Γ_M, (b) strain field fluctuation scattering parameter Γ_S and doping Ag, Li content of Mg₂Si_0.3Sn_0.7

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 Mg_2(1－x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05)和Mg_2(1－y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7(0 ≤ y ≤ 0.08)在300 K的物理参数

Table 1. Physical parameters of Mg_2(1－x)Ag_2xSi_0.3Sn_0.7 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05) and Mg_2(1－y)Li_2ySi_0.3Sn_0.7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 0.08) at 300 K

Composition	σ/10⁴ S·m^–1	R_H/cm³·C^–1	p/10¹⁹ cm^–3	μ/cm²·V^–1·s^–1	S/μV·K^–1	m^*(m₀)
x = 0	0.15	–3.22	–0.19	48.3	–458.0	1.6
x = 0.01	3.48	0.135	4.64	46.8	154.7	1.2
x = 0.02	3.33	0.173	3.60	57.7	166.4	1.1
x = 0.03	3.73	0.186	3.35	69.5	163.8	1.0
x = 0.04	3.11	0.155	4.03	48.2	160.6	1.1
x = 0.05	3.62	0.153	4.09	53.7	154.7	1.1
y = 0.02	11.20	0.056	11.10	63.1	90.7	1.0
y = 0.04	9.65	0.044	14.00	42.8	91.3	1.2
y = 0.06	13.14	0.042	14.70	55.8	82.2	1.1
y = 0.08	9.74	0.041	15.10	40.2	83.9	1.2

下载: 导出CSV

[1]	Dresselhaus M S, Chen G, Tang M Y, Yang R G, Lee H, Wang D Z, Ren Z F, Fleurial J P, Gogna P 2007 Adv. Mater. 19 1043 Google Scholar
[2]	Snyder G J, Toberer E S 2008 Nat. Mater. 7 105 Google Scholar
[3]	Bell L E 2008 Science 321 1457 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhu T, Liu Y, Fu C, Heremans J P, Snyder G J, Zhao X 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1605884 Google Scholar
[5]	朱航天, 任武洋, 张勤勇, 任志锋 2018 西华大学学报(自然科学版) 37 15 Google Scholar Zhu H T, Ren W Y, Zhang Q Y, Ren Z F 2018 J. Xihua Univ. (Natural Science Edition) 37 15 Google Scholar
[6]	Pei Y, Shi X, Lalonde A, Wang H, Chen L, Snyder G J 2011 Nature 473 66 Google Scholar
[7]	Mao J, Wang Y, Ge B, Jie Q, Liu Z, Saparamadu U, Liu W, Ren Z 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 20726 Google Scholar
[8]	Lu Q, Wu M, Wu D, Chang C, Guo Y P, Zhou C S, Li W, Ma X M, Wang G, Zhao L D, Huang L, Liu C, He J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 116401 Google Scholar
[9]	Pei Y, Lalonde A D, Wang H, Snyder G J 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 7963 Google Scholar
[10]	张勤勇, 袁国才, 王俊臣, 毛俊西, 雷晓波 2018 西华大学学报(自然科学版) 37 1 Google Scholar Zhang Q Y, Yuan G C, Wang J C, Mao J X, Lei X B 2018 J. Xihua Univ. (Natural Science Edition) 37 1 Google Scholar
[11]	Paul B, Ajay Kumar V, Banerji P 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 064322 Google Scholar
[12]	Xie W J, Yan Y G, Zhu S, Zhou M, Populoh S, Gałązka K, Poon S J, Weidenkaff A, He J, Tang X F, Tritt T M 2013 Acta Mater. 61 2087 Google Scholar
[13]	Heremans J P, Wiendlocha B, Chamoire A M 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 5510 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhang Q, Wang H, Liu W, Wang H, Yu B, Zhang Q, Tian Z, Ni G, Lee S, Esfarjani K, Chen G, Ren Z 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 5246 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhou B Q, Li S, Li W, Li J, Zhang X Y, Lin S Q, Chen Z W, Pei Y Z 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 34033 Google Scholar
[16]	Xiao Y, Wu H, Li W, Yin M, Pei Y, Zhang Y, Fu L, Chen Y, Pennycook S J, Huang L, He J, Zhao L D 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 18732 Google Scholar
[17]	王浚臣, 袁国才, 禹劲秋, 莫小波, 金应荣, 黄丽宏 2018 西华大学学报(自然科学版) 37 68 Google Scholar Wang J C, Yuan G C, Yu J Q, Mo X B, Jin Y R, Huang L H 2018 Journal of Xihua University (Natural Science Edition) 37 68 Google Scholar
[18]	de Boor J, Dasgupta T, Saparamadu U, Müller E, Ren Z F 2017 Mater. Today Energy 4 105 Google Scholar
[19]	Bashir M B A, Mohd Said S, Sabri M F M, Shnawah D A, Elsheikh M H 2014 Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37 569 Google Scholar
[20]	Santos R, Aminorroaya Yamini S, Dou S X 2018 J. Mater. Chem. A 6 3328 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu W, Yin K, Zhang Q, Uher C, Tang X 2017 Nat. Sci. Rev. 4 611 Google Scholar
[22]	Pulikkotil J J, Singh D J, Auluck S, Saravanan M, Misra D K, Dhar A, Budhani R C 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 155204 Google Scholar
[23]	Sun J, Singh D J 2016 Phys. Rev. Appl. 5 024006 Google Scholar
[24]	Tani J I, Kido H 2008 Intermetallics 16 418 Google Scholar
[25]	Tani J I, Kido H 2012 Physica B 407 3493 Google Scholar
[26]	Imai Y, Mori Y, Nakamura S, Takarabe K I 2013 J. Alloys Compd. 549 175 Google Scholar
[27]	Tani J I, Kido H 2008 J. Alloys Compd. 466 335 Google Scholar
[28]	Zhang Q, He J, Zhao X B, Zhang S N, Zhu T J, Yin H, Tritt T M 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 185103 Google Scholar
[29]	Luo W J, Yang M J, Fei C, Shen Q, Jiang H G, Zhang L M 2010 Mater. Trans. 51 288 Google Scholar
[30]	Liu W, Tang X, Li H, Yin K, Sharp J, Zhou X, Uher C 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 13653 Google Scholar
[31]	Ihou-Mouko H, Mercier C, Tobola J, Pont G, Scherrer H 2011 J. Alloys Compd. 509 6503 Google Scholar
[32]	Tada S, Isoda Y, Udono H, Fujiu H, Kumagai S, Shinohara Y 2014 J. Electron. Mater. 43 1580
[33]	Zhang Q, Cheng L, Liu W, Zheng Y, Su X, Chi H, Liu H, Yan Y, Tang X, Uher C 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 23576 Google Scholar
[34]	Tang X, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Peng K, Huang T, Lu X, Wang G, Wang S, Zhou X 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng. 111 1396 Google Scholar
[35]	Yin K, Zhang Q, Zheng Y, Su X, Tang X, Uher C 2015 J. Mater. Chem. C 3 10381 Google Scholar
[36]	Liu W, Chi H, Sun H, Zhang Q, Yin K, Tang X, Zhang Q, Uher C 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 6893 Google Scholar
[37]	de Boor J, Saparamadu U, Mao J, Dahal K, Müller E, Ren Z 2016 Acta Mater. 120 273 Google Scholar
[38]	Saparamadu U, de Boor J, Mao J, Song S, Tian F, Liu W, Zhang Q, Ren Z 2017 Acta Mater. 141 154 Google Scholar
[39]	Gao P, Davis J D, Poltavets V V, Hogan T P 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 929 Google Scholar
[40]	Tang X, Wang G, Zheng Y, Zhang Y, Peng K, Guo L, Wang S, Zeng M, Dai J, Wang G, Zhou X 2016 Scripta Mater. 115 52 Google Scholar
[41]	Kim H S, Gibbs Z M, Tang Y, Wang H, Snyder G J 2015 APL Mater. 3 041506 Google Scholar
[42]	Yang J, Meisner G P, Chen L 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 1140 Google Scholar
[43]	覃玉婷, 仇鹏飞, 史迅, 陈立东 2017 无机材料学报 32 1171 Qin Y T, Qiu P F, Shi X, Chen L D 2017 J. Inorg. Mater. 32 1171
[44]	Slack G A 1957 Phys. Rev. 105 832 Google Scholar
[45]	Abeles B 1963 Phys. Rev. 131 1906 Google Scholar

[1]	黄盛星, 陈健, 王文菲, 王旭东, 姚曼. 新型双过渡金属MXene热电输运性能第一性原理计算. 物理学报, 2024, 73(14): 146301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240432
[2]	刘榕涛, 王晨阳, 黄嘉勉, 罗鹏飞, 刘欣, 叶松, 董子睿, 张继业, 骆军. Sc掺杂Ti_1–xNiSb半哈斯勒合金的制备与热电性能. 物理学报, 2023, 72(8): 087201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230035
[3]	陈上峰, 孙乃坤, 张宪民, 王凯, 李武, 韩艳, 吴丽君, 岱钦. Mn₃As₂掺杂Cd₃As₂纳米结构的制备及热电性能. 物理学报, 2022, 71(18): 187201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220584
[4]	魏江涛, 杨亮亮, 魏磊, 秦源浩, 宋培帅, 张明亮, 杨富华, 王晓东. Si微/纳米带的制备与热电性能. 物理学报, 2021, 70(18): 187304. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210801
[5]	梁婷, 王阳阳, 刘国宏, 符汪洋, 王怀璋, 陈静飞. V掺杂二维MoS₂体系气体吸附性能的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2021, 70(8): 080701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202043
[6]	邹平, 吕丹, 徐桂英. 高压烧结制备Tb掺杂n型(Bi_1–xTb_x)₂(Te_0.9Se_0.1)₃合金及其微结构和热电性能. 物理学报, 2020, 69(5): 057201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191561
[7]	郑丽仙, 胡剑峰, 骆军. 铜掺杂Cu₂SnSe₄的热电输运性能. 物理学报, 2020, 69(24): 247102. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200861
[8]	王拓, 陈弘毅, 仇鹏飞, 史迅, 陈立东. 具有本征低晶格热导率的硫化银快离子导体的热电性能. 物理学报, 2019, 68(9): 090201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190073
[9]	王冠仕, 林彦明, 赵亚丽, 姜振益, 张晓东. (Cu,N)共掺杂TiO₂/MoS₂异质结的电子和光学性能:杂化泛函HSE06. 物理学报, 2018, 67(23): 233101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181520
[10]	嘉明珍, 王红艳, 陈元正, 马存良, 王辉. Al, Fe, Mg掺杂Li2MnSiO4的电子结构和电化学性能的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(8): 087101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.087101
[11]	孟代仪, 申兰先, 晒旭霞, 董国俊, 邓书康. Ge掺杂n型Sn基Ⅷ型单晶笼合物的制备及热电传输特性. 物理学报, 2013, 62(24): 247401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.247401
[12]	余波. Ag掺杂对p型Pb0.5Sn0.5Te化合物热电性能的影响规律. 物理学报, 2012, 61(21): 217104. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.217104
[13]	张贺, 骆军, 朱航天, 刘泉林, 梁敬魁, 饶光辉. Cu掺杂AgSbTe2化合物的相稳定、晶体结构及热电性能. 物理学报, 2012, 61(8): 086101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.086101
[14]	刘剑, 王春雷, 苏文斌, 王洪超, 张家良, 梅良模. Nb掺杂对还原性烧结的TiO2-陶瓷的晶体结构及热电性能的影响. 物理学报, 2011, 60(8): 087204. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.087204
[15]	王作成, 李涵, 苏贤礼, 唐新峰. In0.3Co4Sb12-xSex 方钴矿热电材料的制备和热电性能. 物理学报, 2011, 60(2): 027202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.027202
[16]	曹卫强, 邓书康, 唐新峰, 李鹏. 熔体旋甩工艺对Zn掺杂Ⅰ-型Ba8Ga12Zn2Ge32笼合物微结构及热电性能的影响. 物理学报, 2009, 58(1): 612-618. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.612
[17]	张轶群, 施毅, 濮林, 张荣, 郑有炓. 纳米线阵列横向输运的热电特性研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(8): 5198-5204. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5198
[18]	蒋俊, 许高杰, 崔平, 陈立东. TeI4掺杂量对n型Bi2Te3基烧结材料热电性能的影响. 物理学报, 2006, 55(9): 4849-4853. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4849
[19]	罗派峰, 唐新峰, 熊聪, 张清杰. 多壁碳纳米管对p型Ba0.3FeCo3Sb12化合物热电性能的影响. 物理学报, 2005, 54(5): 2403-2408. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2403
[20]	初宝进, 李国荣, 殷庆瑞, 张望重, 陈大任. 非化学计量和掺杂对(Na1/2Bi1/2)0.92Ba0.08TiO3陶瓷电性能的影响. 物理学报, 2001, 50(10): 2012-2016. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2012

计量

文章访问数: 8685
PDF下载量: 79
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

Mg₂Si_0.3Sn_0.7掺杂Ag和Li的热电性能对比

Comparative study of thermoelectric properties of Mg₂Si_0.3Sn_0.7 doped by Ag or Li

摘要

Abstract

作者及机构信息

1.
西华大学材料科学与工程学院, 成都　610039

2.
西华大学西华学院, 成都　610039

通信作者: 张勤勇, zhangqy@mail.xhu.edu.cn

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China

2.
Xihua Honor College, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China

Corresponding author: Zhang Qin-Yong, zhangqy@mail.xhu.edu.cn

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

施引文献

目录

计量

作者中心

审稿中心

关于期刊

关于我们

搜索

留言板