-
基于反铁磁材料的自旋逻辑器件被认为具有更低的能量损耗、更快的速度和更高的稳定性, 这使得反铁磁材料的超快自旋动力学成为当前自旋电子学研究的热点. 由于反铁磁体具有强的交换耦合和高的共振频率, 将在GHz甚至THz波段得到广泛应用. 本文综述了利用太赫兹(THz)脉冲的磁场分量与反铁磁自旋序之间的相互作用进行探测与操控. 利用THz脉冲时域光谱, 系统研究了反铁磁性稀土正铁氧体(RFeO3)中自旋共振的非热激发及其弛豫动力学. 总结了RFeO3的准铁磁和准反铁磁自旋模式的共振频率, 以及由R3+-Fe3+离子间的相互作用所确定的自旋重取向温区. 不仅可以利用具有时间延迟的THz双脉冲实现DyFeO3中自旋极化的相干控制, 利用材料的各向异性以单个THz脉冲也可以实现YFeO3中的自旋波相干调控. 在ErxY1－xFeO3单晶样品中, 找到了自旋与真空磁子的关联交换耦合的实验证据, 证明了存在以物质-物质相互作用形式的迪克协作耦合. 最后, 讨论了THz波在TmFeO3晶体传播过程中诱导的磁极化子.Antiferromagnets (AFM) are promising for future spintronic applications due to their advantageous properties. Antiferromagnets produce no stray fields and are insensitive to external magnetic field perturbations. Furthermore, antiferromagnets show intrinsic high terahertz (THz) frequency dynamics. The THz pulses are a direct and general probe of ultrafast spin dynamics in insulating antiferromagnets. In this review article, we discuss the excitation and control of the antiferromagnetic spin resonances in rare-earth orthoferrites (RFeO3, R indicates Y and rare-earth element) with the THz electromagnetic pulsetime-domain spectroscopy. We believe that this approach is general and can be applied to a broad range of materials with different AFM spin alignments, giving a novel non-contact approach to probing AFM order with ps temporal resolution. We summarize different quasi-ferromagnetic modes (qFM) and quasi-antiferromagnetic modes (qAFM), as well as the spin reorientation transition temperatures of RFeO3. Coherent control of spin waves at THz frequency promises fruitful applications in ultrafast magnetization control and has received increasing attention. It is demonstrated that not only the delay time between the excitation and control THz pulses arriving DyFeO3, but also the intrinsic dielectric anisotropy of YFeO3 in the THz range allow the coherent control of both the amplitude and the phase of the excited spin waves. Moreover, we outline the current observation of Dicke cooperativity in magnetic interaction of ErxY1－xFeO3, which presents a route to understanding, controlling, and predicting novel phases of condensed matter by using the concepts and tools available in quantum optics. Finally, magnon-polaritonsare demonstrated to play a key role in preparing the THz waves through TmFeO3.
[1] Jungwirth T, Marti X, Wadley P, Wunderlich J 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 231
Google Scholar
[2] Baltz V, Manchon A, Tsoi M, Moriyama T, Ono T, Tserkovnyak Y 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 015005
Google Scholar
[3] Kimel A V, Kirilyuk A, Tsvetkov A, Pisarev R V, Rasing T 2004 Nature 429 850
Google Scholar
[4] de Jong J A, Razdolski I, Kalashnikova A M, Pisarev R V, Balbashov A M, Kirilyuk A, Kimel A V 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 157601
Google Scholar
[5] Kirilyuk A, Kimel A V, Rasing T 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 2731
Google Scholar
[6] Satoh T, Cho S J, Iida R, Shimura T, Kuroda K, Ueda H, Ueda Y, Ivanov B A, Nori F, Fiebig M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 077402
Google Scholar
[7] Milano J, Steren L B, Grimsditch M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 077601
Google Scholar
[8] Nishitani J, Nagashima T, Hangyo M 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 174439
Google Scholar
[9] Mikhaylovskiy R V, Hendry E, Secchi A, Mentink J H, Eckstein M, Wu A, Pisarev R V, Kruglyak V V, Katsnelson M I, Rasing T, Kimel A V 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8190
Google Scholar
[10] Jin Z, Tkach A, Casper F, Spetter V, Grimm H, Thomas A, Kampfrath T, Bonn M, Kläui M, Turchinovich D 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 761
Google Scholar
[11] Kampfrath T, Tanaka K, Nelson K A 2013 Nat. Photon. 7 680
Google Scholar
[12] Kampfrath T, Sell A, Klatt G, Pashkin A, Mährlein S, Dekorsy T, Wolf M, Fiebig M, Leitenstorfer A, Huber R 2011 Nat. Photon. 5 31
Google Scholar
[13] Yamaguchi K, Nakajima M, Suemoto T 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 237201
Google Scholar
[14] Yamaguchi K, Kurihara T, Minami Y, Nakajima M, Suemoto T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 137204
Google Scholar
[15] Kimel A V, Kirilyuk A, Usachev P A, Pisarev R V, Balbashov A M, Rasing T 2005 Nature 435 655
Google Scholar
[16] Jiang J, Jin Z, Song G, Lin X, Ma G, Cao S 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 062403
Google Scholar
[17] Jin Z, Mics Z, Ma G, Cheng Z, Bonn M, Turchinovich D 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 094422
Google Scholar
[18] Nova T F, Cartella A, Cantaluppi A, Först M, Bossini D, Mikhaylovskiy R V, Kimel A V, Merlin R, Cavalleri A 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 132
Google Scholar
[19] Baierl S, Hohenleutner M, Kampfrath T, Zvezdin A K, Kimel A V, Huber R, Mikhaylovskiy R V 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 715
Google Scholar
[20] Mikhaylovskiy R V, Huisman T J, Pisarev R V, Rasing T, Kimel A V 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 017205
Google Scholar
[21] Kurihara T, Watanabe H, Nakajima M, Karube S, Oto K, Otani Y, Suemoto T 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 107202
Google Scholar
[22] Li X, Bamba M, Yuan N, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Xiang M, Xu K, Jin Z, Ren W, Ma G, Cao S, Turchinovich D, Kono J 2018 Science 361 794
Google Scholar
[23] Wang Z Q, Lan Y S, Zeng Z Y, Chen X R, Chen Q F 2019 Solid State Commun. 288 10
Google Scholar
[24] Mukhin A A, Biberacher M, Pimenov A, Loidl A 2004 J. Magn. Reson. 170 8
Google Scholar
[25] Sihvola A 2007 Metamaterials 1 2
Google Scholar
[26] Gollub J N, Chin J Y, Cui T J, Smith D R 2009 Opt. Express 17 2122
Google Scholar
[27] Iida R, Satoh T, Shimura T, Kuroda K, Ivanov B, Tokunaga Y, Tokura Y 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 064402
Google Scholar
[28] Song G, Jin Z, Lin X, Jiang J, Wang X, Wu H, Ma G, Cao S 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 163108
Google Scholar
[29] Zhou R, Jin Z, Li G, Ma G, Cheng Z, Wang X 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 061102
Google Scholar
[30] Song G, Jiang J, Wang X, Jin Z, Lin X, Ma G, Cao S 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 243104
Google Scholar
[31] Fu X, Xi X, Bi K, Zhou J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 211108
Google Scholar
[32] Kozlov G V, Lebedev S P, Mukhin A A, Prokhorov A S, Fedorov I V, Balbashov A M, Parsegov I Y 1993 IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 3443
Google Scholar
[33] Zeng X, Fu X, Wang D, Xi X, Zhou J, Li B 2015 Opt. Express 23 31956
Google Scholar
[34] Fu X, Zeng X, Wang D, Zhang H C, Han J, Cui T J 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 14777
Google Scholar
[35] Liu X, Jin Z, Zhang S, Zhang K, Zhao W, Xu K, Lin X, Cheng Z, Cao S, Ma G 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 024001
[36] Liu X, Xie T, Guo J, Yang S, Song Y, Lin X, Cao S, Cheng Z, Jin Z, Wu A, Ma G, Yao J 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 022401
Google Scholar
[37] Dan'shin N K, Kramarchuk G G, Sdvizhkov M A 1986 JETP Lett. 44 85
[38] Nikolov O, Hall I, Barilo S N, Guretskii S A 1994 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6 3793
[39] Zhang K, Xu K, Liu X, Zhang Z, Jin Z, Lin X, Li B, Cao S, Ma G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 23648
Google Scholar
[40] White R 1969 J. Appl. Phys. 40 1061
[41] Fu X, Liu X, Zhou J 2014 Mater. Lett. 132 190
Google Scholar
[42] Lin X, Jiang J, Jin Z, Wang D, Tian Z, Han J, Cheng Z, Ma G 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 092403
Google Scholar
[43] Jiang J, Song G, Wang D, Jin Z, Tian Z, Lin X, Han J, Ma G, Cao S, Cheng Z 2016 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28 116002
Google Scholar
[44] Todorov Y, Andrews A M, Colombelli R, Liberato S D, Ciuti C, Klang P, Strasser G, Sirtori C 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 196402
Google Scholar
[45] Forn-Díaz P, Lamata L, Rico E, Kono J, Solano E 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 025005
[46] Herrmann G F 1963 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24 597
Google Scholar
[47] Grishunin K, Huisman T, Li G, Mishina E, Rasing T, Kimel A V, Zhang K, Jin Z, Cao S, Ren W, Ma G, Mikhaylovskiy R V 2018 ACS Photon. 5 1375
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a) RFeO3反铁磁晶体晶体结构与自旋结构, 邻近的
${\rm{F}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{3 + }}}}$ 离子沿着a轴反平行有序排列; (b) THz激发的准铁磁模式(qFM)和准反铁磁(qAFM)模式Fig. 1. (a) Lattice and spin structure of RFeO3, adjacent
${\rm{F}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{3 + }}}}$ ions are antiparallel and ordered along the a axis; (b) THz excitation of qFM mode and qAFM mode.
图 2 (a), (b)分别为激发qFM模式(红色)与qAFM模式(蓝色)时的THz时域透射谱, 插图为振荡部分的放大图; (c), (d)分别为振荡部分的傅里叶变换光谱
Fig. 2. (a), (b) THz time-domain transmission spectrum of qFM mode (red curve) and qAFM mode (blue curve), the insets are enlarged versions of the oscillating sections; (c), (d) Fourier transform spectra of the oscillating parts.
图 3 (a), (b) 40 K和300 K时
${\rm{ErFe}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{3}}}$ 的THz时域透射谱, 插图为振荡部分的放大图; (c), (d)分别为振荡部分的傅立叶变换光谱, 插图为${\varGamma _2}$ 与${\varGamma _{\rm{4}}}$ 的示意图Fig. 3. (a), (b) THz time-domain transmission spectra of
${\rm{ErFe}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{3}}}$ at 40 K and 300 K; (c), (d) Fourier transform spectra of the oscillating signals. Insets: schematic diagram of${\varGamma _2}$ and${\varGamma _{\rm{4}}}$ .
图 4 (a) THz脉冲激发qFM模式; (b) THz脉冲激发qAFM模式; (c) THz脉冲同时激发qFM和qAFM模式, 当Δt为qFM(qAFM)振荡周期的1.5倍时, 该自旋进动被有效地抑制; (d)图(c)中振荡部分的傅里叶变换光谱
Fig. 4. (a) THz pulses excite qFM mode; (b) THz pulse excited the qAFM mode; (c) THz pulse excites both qFM mode and qAFM mode, as the interval time is 1.5 times of the qFM (qAFM) oscillation period, the spin precession is suppressed; (d) Fourier transform spectra of the oscillating parts in (c).
图 5 当
$\theta $ = 0°, 45°, 90°时, 透过样品后THz波的电场强度,$\theta $ 的定义如插图所示; (b)振荡部分的放大, 其时域区间为10−25 ps范围内的THz电场, 实线是单指数衰减拟合; (c), (d) qFM模式自旋振荡部分的傅立叶变换得到振幅和相位随方位角$\theta $ 的变化[17]Fig. 5. (a) THz electric fields transmitted through the YFeO3, as
$\theta $ = 0°, 45° and 90°; (b) the oscillating parts of the (a) from 10 ps to 25 ps, the solid line is a single exponential decay fitting; (c) amplitude and (d) phase varies with the angle$\theta $ , by using the Fourier transform of the spin oscillating of qFM mode [17]. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[17]
图 6 (a) ErFeO3中的Er3+离子由于多重效应的能级分裂示意图; (b)从0 T到10 T不同磁场下的吸收系数谱, 白色虚线为Fe3+的qFM磁振模式; (c)计算得到不同磁场下晶体场的双重态
$\left| {i = 1} \right\rangle $ 和$\left| {i = 2} \right\rangle $ [22]Fig. 6. (a) Energy level splitting scheme of
${\rm{E}}{{\rm{r}}^{{\rm{3 + }}}}$ ions due to multiple effects; (b) absorption coefficient spectra at various magnetic fields from 0 T to 10 T, the white dashed line is the${\rm{F}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{3 + }}}}$ qFM magnon mode; (c) calculated energy levels for the$\left| {i = 1} \right\rangle $ and$\left| {i = {\rm{2}}} \right\rangle $ crystal-field doublets as a function of magnetic field[22].
图 7 Er3+的自旋和Fe3+的qFM真空磁子间关联耦合的实验验证 (a)−(k)不同温度和Y3+掺杂时的吸收光谱, 图中的虚线用来帮助识别杂化模式; (l)耦合系数Λ正比于
$\sqrt {{\eta _{{\rm{spin}}}}{\omega _{{\rm{FM}}}}} $ , 图为两种机制来决定实验中的${\eta _{{\rm{spin}}}}$ [22]Fig. 7. Experimental evidence for cooperative coupling between paramagnetic
${\rm{E}}{{\rm{r}}^{{\rm{3 + }}}}$ spins and${\rm{F}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{3 + }}}}$ vacuum magnons: (a)−(k) Absorption spectra measured at various temperatures and${{\rm{Y}}^{{\rm{3 + }}}}$ doping levels, dashed black lines are guides to the eye for identifying the hybridized modes; (l) the coupling rate Λ is proportionality with$\sqrt {{\eta _{{\rm{spin}}}}{\omega _{{\rm{FM}}}}} $ , the inset shows two types of mechanisms that determine${\eta _{{\rm{spin}}}}$ in the measurements[22]. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[22].
图 8 (a) 透过TmFeO3晶体的THz时域波形及其(b)傅里叶变换谱; (c) TmFeO3薄片的THz产生波形及其相应的(d)傅里叶变换谱; (e)自旋共振附近的磁子-极化子色散关系[47]
Fig. 8. (a) THz waveforms transmitted through the TmFeO3 sample and (b) its Fourier transforms of the time traces; (c) THz generation in a TmFeO3 slab by a laser pulse and (d) its Fourier spectra shown in (c); (e) the magnon-polariton dispersion in the vicinity of the spin resonance[47] . Reproduced with permission from Ref.[47]
表 1 RFeO3的qFM和qAFM模式的自旋共振频率
Table 1. The qFM and qAFM mode resonance frequencies of rare earth orthoferrite
RFeO3 υqFM/THz υqAFM/THz Reference YFeO3 0.299(300K) 0.527(300K) [13 29] PrFeO3 0.34(300K) 0.41(300K) [30] NdFeO3 0.28(300K) 0.485(290K) [16] GdFeO3 0.305(300K) 0.606(300K) [31] TbFeO3 0.322(300K) 0.537(300K) [32] HoFeO3 0.37(270K) 0.57(270K) [33] ErFeO3 0.377(300K) 0.673(300K) [14] TmFeO3 0.402(300K) 0.698(300K) [32] DyFeO3 0.379(300K) 0.51(300K) [32] SmFeO3 0.34(200K) 0.62(200K) [34] 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 SmxDy1–xFeO3单晶在40K的qFM模式的自旋共振频率与Sm浓度的关系[35]
Table 2. Resonance frequencies of qFM mode for the single crystals versus Sm concentration at 40 K[34]
RFeO3 υqFM/THz DyFeO3 0.2(40K) Sm0.5Dy0.5FeO3 0.35(40K) Sm0.6Dy0.4FeO3 0.39(40K) Sm0.7Dy0.3FeO3 0.45(40K) SmFeO3 0.55(40K)
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 稀土正铁氧体的自旋重取向温区总结
Table 3. The spin reorientation temperature region of rare earth ferrite
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 SmxDy1–xFeO3的自旋重取向温度与Sm浓度的关系
Table 4. SRT temperatures for the SDFO single crystal family versus Sm concentration
RFeO3 the spin reorientation temperature region Sm0.3Dy0.7FeO3 75–105K Sm0.5Dy0.5FeO3 175–220K Sm0.6Dy0.4FeO3 235–275K
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Jungwirth T, Marti X, Wadley P, Wunderlich J 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 231
Google Scholar
[2] Baltz V, Manchon A, Tsoi M, Moriyama T, Ono T, Tserkovnyak Y 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 015005
Google Scholar
[3] Kimel A V, Kirilyuk A, Tsvetkov A, Pisarev R V, Rasing T 2004 Nature 429 850
Google Scholar
[4] de Jong J A, Razdolski I, Kalashnikova A M, Pisarev R V, Balbashov A M, Kirilyuk A, Kimel A V 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 157601
Google Scholar
[5] Kirilyuk A, Kimel A V, Rasing T 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 2731
Google Scholar
[6] Satoh T, Cho S J, Iida R, Shimura T, Kuroda K, Ueda H, Ueda Y, Ivanov B A, Nori F, Fiebig M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 077402
Google Scholar
[7] Milano J, Steren L B, Grimsditch M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 077601
Google Scholar
[8] Nishitani J, Nagashima T, Hangyo M 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 174439
Google Scholar
[9] Mikhaylovskiy R V, Hendry E, Secchi A, Mentink J H, Eckstein M, Wu A, Pisarev R V, Kruglyak V V, Katsnelson M I, Rasing T, Kimel A V 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8190
Google Scholar
[10] Jin Z, Tkach A, Casper F, Spetter V, Grimm H, Thomas A, Kampfrath T, Bonn M, Kläui M, Turchinovich D 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 761
Google Scholar
[11] Kampfrath T, Tanaka K, Nelson K A 2013 Nat. Photon. 7 680
Google Scholar
[12] Kampfrath T, Sell A, Klatt G, Pashkin A, Mährlein S, Dekorsy T, Wolf M, Fiebig M, Leitenstorfer A, Huber R 2011 Nat. Photon. 5 31
Google Scholar
[13] Yamaguchi K, Nakajima M, Suemoto T 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 237201
Google Scholar
[14] Yamaguchi K, Kurihara T, Minami Y, Nakajima M, Suemoto T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 137204
Google Scholar
[15] Kimel A V, Kirilyuk A, Usachev P A, Pisarev R V, Balbashov A M, Rasing T 2005 Nature 435 655
Google Scholar
[16] Jiang J, Jin Z, Song G, Lin X, Ma G, Cao S 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 062403
Google Scholar
[17] Jin Z, Mics Z, Ma G, Cheng Z, Bonn M, Turchinovich D 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 094422
Google Scholar
[18] Nova T F, Cartella A, Cantaluppi A, Först M, Bossini D, Mikhaylovskiy R V, Kimel A V, Merlin R, Cavalleri A 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 132
Google Scholar
[19] Baierl S, Hohenleutner M, Kampfrath T, Zvezdin A K, Kimel A V, Huber R, Mikhaylovskiy R V 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 715
Google Scholar
[20] Mikhaylovskiy R V, Huisman T J, Pisarev R V, Rasing T, Kimel A V 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 017205
Google Scholar
[21] Kurihara T, Watanabe H, Nakajima M, Karube S, Oto K, Otani Y, Suemoto T 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 107202
Google Scholar
[22] Li X, Bamba M, Yuan N, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Xiang M, Xu K, Jin Z, Ren W, Ma G, Cao S, Turchinovich D, Kono J 2018 Science 361 794
Google Scholar
[23] Wang Z Q, Lan Y S, Zeng Z Y, Chen X R, Chen Q F 2019 Solid State Commun. 288 10
Google Scholar
[24] Mukhin A A, Biberacher M, Pimenov A, Loidl A 2004 J. Magn. Reson. 170 8
Google Scholar
[25] Sihvola A 2007 Metamaterials 1 2
Google Scholar
[26] Gollub J N, Chin J Y, Cui T J, Smith D R 2009 Opt. Express 17 2122
Google Scholar
[27] Iida R, Satoh T, Shimura T, Kuroda K, Ivanov B, Tokunaga Y, Tokura Y 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 064402
Google Scholar
[28] Song G, Jin Z, Lin X, Jiang J, Wang X, Wu H, Ma G, Cao S 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 163108
Google Scholar
[29] Zhou R, Jin Z, Li G, Ma G, Cheng Z, Wang X 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 061102
Google Scholar
[30] Song G, Jiang J, Wang X, Jin Z, Lin X, Ma G, Cao S 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 243104
Google Scholar
[31] Fu X, Xi X, Bi K, Zhou J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 211108
Google Scholar
[32] Kozlov G V, Lebedev S P, Mukhin A A, Prokhorov A S, Fedorov I V, Balbashov A M, Parsegov I Y 1993 IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 3443
Google Scholar
[33] Zeng X, Fu X, Wang D, Xi X, Zhou J, Li B 2015 Opt. Express 23 31956
Google Scholar
[34] Fu X, Zeng X, Wang D, Zhang H C, Han J, Cui T J 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 14777
Google Scholar
[35] Liu X, Jin Z, Zhang S, Zhang K, Zhao W, Xu K, Lin X, Cheng Z, Cao S, Ma G 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 024001
[36] Liu X, Xie T, Guo J, Yang S, Song Y, Lin X, Cao S, Cheng Z, Jin Z, Wu A, Ma G, Yao J 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 022401
Google Scholar
[37] Dan'shin N K, Kramarchuk G G, Sdvizhkov M A 1986 JETP Lett. 44 85
[38] Nikolov O, Hall I, Barilo S N, Guretskii S A 1994 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6 3793
[39] Zhang K, Xu K, Liu X, Zhang Z, Jin Z, Lin X, Li B, Cao S, Ma G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 23648
Google Scholar
[40] White R 1969 J. Appl. Phys. 40 1061
[41] Fu X, Liu X, Zhou J 2014 Mater. Lett. 132 190
Google Scholar
[42] Lin X, Jiang J, Jin Z, Wang D, Tian Z, Han J, Cheng Z, Ma G 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 092403
Google Scholar
[43] Jiang J, Song G, Wang D, Jin Z, Tian Z, Lin X, Han J, Ma G, Cao S, Cheng Z 2016 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28 116002
Google Scholar
[44] Todorov Y, Andrews A M, Colombelli R, Liberato S D, Ciuti C, Klang P, Strasser G, Sirtori C 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 196402
Google Scholar
[45] Forn-Díaz P, Lamata L, Rico E, Kono J, Solano E 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 025005
[46] Herrmann G F 1963 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24 597
Google Scholar
[47] Grishunin K, Huisman T, Li G, Mishina E, Rasing T, Kimel A V, Zhang K, Jin Z, Cao S, Ren W, Ma G, Mikhaylovskiy R V 2018 ACS Photon. 5 1375
Google Scholar
-
[1] 陈兆亮, 卢达标, 叶旭斌, 赵浩婷, 张杰, 潘昭, 迟振华, 崔田, 沈瑶, 龙有文. 钙钛矿型CeTaN2O的高压制备及其磁性和电学性质. 物理学报, 2024, 73(8): 080702. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240025 [2] 邓珊珊, 宋平, 刘潇贺, 姚森, 赵谦毅. 吉帕级单轴应力下Mn3Sn单晶的磁化率增强. 物理学报, 2024, 73(12): 127501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240287 [3] 卿煜林, 彭小莉, 文林, 胡爱元. 自旋为1/2的双层平方晶格阻挫模型的基态相变. 物理学报, 2022, 71(3): 037501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211584 [4] 卿煜林, 彭小莉, 胡爱元. 自旋为1的双层平方晶格阻挫模型的相变. 物理学报, 2022, 71(4): 047501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211685 [5] 易恩魁, 王彬, 沈韩, 沈冰. 轴子拓扑绝缘体候选材料层状 ${\bf{Eu}}_{ 1- x}{\bf{Ca}}_{ x}{\bf{In}}_{\bf2}{\bf{As}}_{\bf2}$ 的物性研究. 物理学报, 2021, 70(12): 127502. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210042[6] 卿煜林, 彭小莉, 文林, 胡爱元. 自旋为1/2的双层平方晶格阻挫模型的基态相变研究. 物理学报, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211584 [7] 文林, 胡爱元. 双二次交换作用和各向异性对反铁磁体相变温度的影响. 物理学报, 2020, 69(10): 107501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200077 [8] 任壮, 成龙, 谢尔盖·固瑞特斯基, 那泽亚·柳博奇科, 李江涛, 尚加敏, 谢尔盖·巴里洛, 武安华, 亚历山大·卡拉什尼科娃, 马宗伟, 周春, 盛志高. Ho1–xYxFeO3单晶自旋重取向的掺杂效应与磁控效应的太赫兹光谱. 物理学报, 2020, 69(20): 207802. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201518 [9] 方雨青, 金钻明, 陈海洋, 阮舜逸, 李炬赓, 曹世勋, 彭滟, 马国宏, 朱亦鸣. 高通量制备的SmxPr1–xFeO3晶体中反铁磁自旋模式和晶体场跃迁的太赫兹光谱. 物理学报, 2020, 69(20): 209501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200732 [10] 张顺浓, 朱伟骅, 李炬赓, 金钻明, 戴晔, 张宗芝, 马国宏, 姚建铨. 铁磁异质结构中的超快自旋流调制实现相干太赫兹辐射. 物理学报, 2018, 67(19): 197202. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181178 [11] 樊正富, 谭智勇, 万文坚, 邢晓, 林贤, 金钻明, 曹俊诚, 马国宏. 低温生长砷化镓的超快光抽运-太赫兹探测光谱. 物理学报, 2017, 66(8): 087801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.087801 [12] 刘奎立, 周思华, 陈松岭. 金属离子掺杂对CuO基纳米复合材料的交换偏置调控. 物理学报, 2015, 64(13): 137501. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.137501 [13] 郭静, 孙力玲. 压力下碱金属铁硒基超导体中的现象与物理. 物理学报, 2015, 64(21): 217406. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.217406 [14] 胡妮, 刘雍, 汤五丰, 裴玲, 方鹏飞, 熊锐, 石兢. La0.4Ca0.6MnO3中Mn-位Fe和Cr掺杂对磁性质的影响. 物理学报, 2014, 63(23): 237502. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.237502 [15] 王美娜, 李英, 王天兴, 刘国栋. 正交多铁性材料DyMnO3的磁性质研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(22): 227101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.227101 [16] 胡妮, 刘雍, 程莉, 石兢, 熊锐. La0.4Ca0.6MnO3系统中Mn位Fe和Cr掺杂效应的比较性研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(1): 017503. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.017503 [17] 刘先锋, 韩玖荣, 江学范. 阻挫三角反铁磁AgCrO2螺旋自旋序的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(9): 6487-6493. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6487 [18] 李 宏, 王炜路, 公丕锋. 单量子阱的自旋电流. 物理学报, 2007, 56(4): 2405-2408. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2405 [19] 滕蛟, 蔡建旺, 熊小涛, 赖武彦, 朱逢吾. NiFe/FeMn双层膜交换偏置的形成及热稳定性研究. 物理学报, 2004, 53(1): 272-275. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.272 [20] 钟健. Heisenberg反铁磁超晶格的自旋波. 物理学报, 1990, 39(3): 486-490. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.486
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 10553
- PDF下载量: 178
- 被引次数: 0
