石榴石型固态锂电池中的物理问题

赵宁; 穆爽; 郭向欣

doi:10.7498/aps.69.20201191

摘要

采用固体电解质的固态锂电池具有实现高能量密度和高安全性的潜力, 在新能源汽车和可穿戴电子设备领域的应用大有可为. 石榴石型Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂(LLZO)固体电解质具有高离子电导率和对锂稳定等特点, 是当下最受人瞩目的固体电解质材料之一. 本文从物理的角度, 探讨热力学和动力学两种因素对LLZO电化学稳定性的影响, 离子界面输运机理及其在陶瓷和复合电解质中的应用. 针对固态锂电池突出的界面问题, 从界面匹配、电荷转移、体积应变、热量传递等方面, 讨论固态锂电池循环寿命和实际安全性, 给出构建理想界面的关键因素. 最后, 从电极、电解质和电池结构设计等方面分析如何构建高能量密度的固态锂电池电芯. 本文希望通过对LLZO最新理论和实验研究成果的分析总结, 阐明石榴石型固态锂电池中的关键物理问题, 为高性能固态锂电池的发展提供依据.

关键词:

Abstract

Solid-state lithium batteries with solid electrolytes have the potential to achieve high energy density and safety, which promise to be used in the electric vehicles and wearable devices. The garnet-type Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ (LLZO) has attracted a great deal of attention due to its high ionic conductivity and good chemical stability to lithium metal. Here in this paper, based on recent progress, this review provides a fundamental understanding of garnet-based electrolytes by evaluating the thermodynamic/kinetics stability and analyzing the Li⁺ conduction mechanism of ceramics and composite garnet electrolytes. To address the key factors influencing the cyclability and safety of solid-state batteries, the rational design of solid electrolyte/electrode interfaces is discussed in terms of interface matching, charge transfer, strain/stress, thermal stability, etc. Finally, the design guidelines of high-energy-density solid-state batteries are introduced by analyzing the fabrication of electrodes, solid electrolyte and bipolar current collectors. Through the above discussion, this review provides an insight into the physical parameters affecting the performance of garnet-based electrolytes and interfaces, to guide one in carrying on more target-oriented researches of developing high-performance solid-state batteries.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

青岛大学物理科学学院, 青岛　266071

通信作者: 郭向欣, xxguo@qdu.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2018YFB0104300)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: U1932205, 51771222, 52002197, 22005163)、山东省自然科学基金(批准号: ZR2017BEM038)、中国博士后科学基金(批准号: 2018M632617)、山东省泰山学者(批准号: ts201712035)和青岛市创业创新领军人才(批准号: 193210zhc)资助的课题

Authors and contacts

College of Physics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China

Corresponding author: Guo Xiang-Xin, xxguo@qdu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB0104300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1932205, 51771222, 52002197, 22005163), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2017BEM038), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M632617), Taishan Scholars Program (Grant No. ts201712035), and the Project of Qingdao Leading Talents in Entrepreneurship and Innovation (Grant No. 193210zhc)

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	张舒, 王少飞, 凌仕刚, 高健, 吴娇杨, 肖睿娟, 李泓, 陈立泉 2014 储能科学与技术 3 376 Google Scholar Zhang S, Wang S F, Ling S G, Gao J, Wu J Y, Xiao R J, Li H, Chen L Q 2014 Energy Storage Sci. Tech. 3 376 Google Scholar
[2]	Judez X, Eshetu G G, Li C, Rodriguez-Martinez L M, Zhang H, Armand M 2018 Joule 2 2208 Google Scholar
[3]	Liu J, Bao Z N, Cui Y, Dufek E J, Goodenough J B, Khalifah P, Li Q Y, Liaw B Y, Liu P, Manthiram A, Meng Y S, Subramanian V R, Toney M F, Viswanathan V V, Whittingham M S, Xiao J, Xu W, Yang J H, Yang X Q, Zhang J G 2019 Nat. Energy 4 180 Google Scholar
[4]	Randau S, Weber D A, Kötz O, Koerver R, Braun P, Weber A, Ivers-Tiffée E, Adermann T, Kulisch J, Zeier W G, Richter F H, Janek J 2020 Nat. Energy 5 259 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang C, Fu K, Kammampata S P, McOwen D W, Samson A J, Zhang L, Hitz G T, Nolan A M, Wachsman E D, Mo Y, Thangadurai V, Hu L 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 4257 Google Scholar
[6]	Samson A J, Hofstetter K, Bag S, Thangadurai V 2019 Energy Environ. Sci. 12 2957 Google Scholar
[7]	郑碧珠, 王红春, 马嘉林, 龚正良, 杨勇 2017 中国科学: 化学 47 579 Google Scholar Zheng B Z, Wang H C, Ma J L, Gong Z L, Yang Y 2017 Sci. Sin. Chim. 47 579 Google Scholar
[8]	Ramakumar S, Deviannapoorani C, Dhivya L, Shankar L S, Murugan R 2017 Prog. Mater Sci. 88 325 Google Scholar
[9]	Guo S J, Sun Y G, Cao A M 2020 Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 36 329 Google Scholar
[10]	Famprikis T, Canepa P, Dawson J A, Islam M S, Masquelier C 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1278 Google Scholar
[11]	Murugan R, Thangadurai V, Weppner W 2007 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 7778 Google Scholar
[12]	Du F M, Zhao N, Li Y Q, Chen C, Liu Z W, Guo X X 2015 J. Power Sources 300 24 Google Scholar
[13]	Park K, Yu B, Jung J W, Li Y T, Zhou W D, Gao H C, Son S, Goodenough J B 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 8051 Google Scholar
[14]	Monroe C, Newman J 2005 J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 A396 Google Scholar
[15]	Zou Z Y, Li Y J, Lu Z H, Wang D, Cui Y H, Guo B K, Li Y J, Liang X M, Feng J W, Li H, Nan C W, Armand M, Chen L Q, Xu K, Shi S Q 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 4169 Google Scholar
[16]	Wan J, Xie J, Mackanic D G, Burke W, Bao Z, Cui Y 2018 Mater. Today Nano 4 1 Google Scholar
[17]	Zhu Y Z, He X F, Mo Y F 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 3253 Google Scholar
[18]	Han F D, Zhu Y Z, He X F, Mo Y F, Wang C S 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1501590 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhuang Y, Zou Z Y, Lu B, Li Y J, Wang D, Avdeev M, Shi S Q 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 068202 Google Scholar
[20]	Xiong Z H, Shi S Q, Ouyang C Y, Lei M S, Hu L Y, Ji Y H, Wang Z X, Chen L Q 2005 Phys. Lett. A 337 247 Google Scholar
[21]	Shi S Q, Gao J, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Wu Q, Ju W W, Ouyang C Y, Xiao R J 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 018212 Google Scholar
[22]	Qin S Y, Zhu X H, Jiang Y, Ling M E, Hu Z W, Zhu J L 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 113901 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang J X, Zhao N, Zhang M, Li Y Q, Chu P K, Guo X X, Di Z F, Wang X, Li H 2016 Nano Energy 28 447 Google Scholar
[24]	Li Z, Huang H M, Zhu J K, Wu J F, Yang H, Wei L, Guo X 2019 ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11 784 Google Scholar
[25]	Huang Z Y, Pang W Y, Liang P, Jin Z H, Grundish N, Li Y T, Wang C A 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A 7 16425 Google Scholar
[26]	Huo H Y, Li X N, Sun Y P, Lin X T, Doyle-Davis K, Liang J W, Gao X J, Li R Y, Huang H, Guo X X, Sun X L 2020 Nano Energy 73 104836 Google Scholar
[27]	Huo H Y, Luo J, Thangadurai V, Guo X X, Nan C W, Sun X L 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 252 Google Scholar
[28]	Huo H Y, Chen Y, Zhao N, Lin X T, Luo J, Yang X F, Liu Y L, Guo X X, Sun X L 2019 Nano Energy 61 119 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhou W D, Wang S F, Li Y T, Xin S, Manthiram A, Goodenough J B 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 9385 Google Scholar
[30]	Cheng L, Crumlin E J, Chen W, Qiao R, Hou H, Franz Lux S, Zorba V, Russo R, Kostecki R, Liu Z, Persson K, Yang W, Cabana J, Richardson T, Chen G, Doeff M 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 18294 Google Scholar
[31]	Zhang J J, Zang X, Wen H J, Dong T T, Chai J C, Li Y, Chen B B, Zhao J W, Dong S M, Ma J, Yue L P, Liu Z H, Guo X X, Cui G L, Chen L Q 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 4940 Google Scholar
[32]	Yu X R, Wang L L, Ma J, Sun X W, Zhou X H, Cui G L 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903939 Google Scholar
[33]	Chen L, Li Y T, Li S P, Fan L Z, Nan C W, Goodenough J B 2018 Nano Energy 46 176 Google Scholar
[34]	Huo H Y, Chen Y, Luo J, Yang X F, Guo X X, Sun X L 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1804004 Google Scholar
[35]	Syzdek J S, Armand M, Gizowska M, Marcinek M, Sasim E, Szafran M, Wieczorek W 2009 J. Power Sources 194 66 Google Scholar
[36]	Han F D, Yue J, Chen C, Zhao N, Fan X L, Ma Z H, Gao T, Wang F, Guo X X, Wang C S 2018 Joule 2 497 Google Scholar
[37]	Kato T, Hamanaka T, Yamamoto K, Hirayama T, Sagane F, Motoyama M, Iriyama Y 2014 J. Power Sources 260 292 Google Scholar
[38]	Bi Z J, Zhao N, Ma L N, Fu Z Q, Xu F F, Wang C S, Guo X X 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 387 124089 Google Scholar
[39]	Vardar G, Bowman W J, Lu Q Y, Wang J Y, Chater R J, Aguadero A, Seibert R, Terry J, Hunt A, Waluyo I, Fong D D, Jarry A, Crumlin E J, Hellstrom S L, Chiang Y M, Yildiz B 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 6259 Google Scholar
[40]	Bi Z J, Zhao N, Ma L, Shi C, Fu Z Q, Xu F F, Guo X X 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 4252 Google Scholar
[41]	Du F M, Zhao N, Fang R, Cui Z H, Li Y Q, Guo X X 2018 J. Inorg. Mater. 33 462 Google Scholar
[42]	Zhang N, Long X H, Wang Z, Yu P F, Han F D, Fu J M, Ren G X, Wu Y R, Zheng S, Huang W C, Wang C S, Li H, Liu X S 2018 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1 5968 Google Scholar
[43]	Ren Y Y, Liu T, Shen Y, Lin Y H, Nan C W 2016 J. Materiomics 2 256 Google Scholar
[44]	Haruyama J, Sodeyama K, Han L, Takada K, Tateyama Y 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 4248 Google Scholar
[45]	de Klerk N J J, Wagemaker M 2018 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1 5609 Google Scholar
[46]	Cheng Z, Liu M, Ganapathy S, Li C, Li Z L, Zhang X Y, He P, Zhou H S, Wagemaker M 2020 Joule 4 1311 Google Scholar
[47]	Liu T, Zhang Y B, Chen R J, Zhao S X, Lin Y H, Nan C W, Shen Y 2017 Electrochem. Commun. 79 1 Google Scholar
[48]	Wu Liang Feng, Zheng Zhe Lai, Xiao Li Dong, Pan Long Li, Yong Gang Wang, Xia Y Y 2020 iScience 23 101071 Google Scholar
[49]	van den Broek J, Afyon S, Rupp J L M 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1600736 Google Scholar
[50]	Panahian Jand S, Kaghazchi P 2018 MRS Commun. 8 591 Google Scholar
[51]	Khokhar W A, Zhao N, Huang W L, Wang H, Bi Z J, Guo X X 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. InterfacesGoogle Scholar
[52]	Huang W L, Zhao N, Bi Z J, Shi C, Guo X X, Fan L Z, Nan C W 2020 Mater. Today Nano 10 100075 Google Scholar
[53]	Gao J, Zhu J X, Li X L, Li J P, Guo X X, Li H, Zhou W D 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 2001918 Google Scholar
[54]	Wu J F, Pu B W, Wang D, Shi S Q, Zhao N, Guo X X, Guo X 2019 ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11 898 Google Scholar
[55]	Li Y T, Chen X, Dolocan A, Cui Z M, Xin S, Xue L G, Xu H H, Park K, Goodenough J B 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 6448 Google Scholar
[56]	Sharafi A, Kazyak E, Davis A L, Yu S, Thompson T, Siegel D J, Dasgupta N P, Sakamoto J 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 7961 Google Scholar
[57]	Kazyak E, Garcia-Mendez R, LePage W S, Sharafi A, Davis A L, Sanchez A J, Chen K H, Haslam C, Sakamoto J, Dasgupta N P 2020 Matter 2 1025 Google Scholar
[58]	Porz L, Swamy T, Sheldon B W, Rettenwander D, Frömling T, Thaman H L, Berendts S, Uecker R, Carter W C, Chiang Y M 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1701003 Google Scholar
[59]	Tian H-K, Chakraborty A, Talin A A, Eisenlohr P, Qi Y 2020 J. Electrochem. Soc. 167 090541 Google Scholar
[60]	Huo H Y, Sun J Y, Chen C, Meng X L, He M H, Zhao N, Guo X X 2018 J. Power Sources 383 150 Google Scholar
[61]	Chung H, Kang B 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 8611 Google Scholar
[62]	Chen R S, Nolan A M, Lu J Z, Wang J Y, Yu X Q, Mo Y F, Chen L Q, Huang X J, Li H 2020 Joule 4 812 Google Scholar
[63]	Wolfenstine J, Allen J L, Read J, Sakamoto J 2013 J. Mater. Sci. 48 5846 Google Scholar
[64]	Jia M Y, Zhao N, Huo H Y, Guo X X 2020 Electrochem. Energy Rev.Google Scholar
[65]	Jung K N, Shin H S, Park M S, Lee J W 2019 ChemElectroChem 6 3842 Google Scholar
[66]	Famprikis T, Canepa P, Dawson J A, Islam M S, Masquelier C 2019 Nature Materials 18 1278
[67]	Wei Z Y, Chen S J, Wang J Y, Wang Z H, Zhang Z H, Yao X Y, Deng Y H, Xu X X 2018 J. Power Sources 394 57 Google Scholar
[68]	Shin H S, Ryu W G, Park M S, Jung K N, Kim H, Lee J W 2018 ChemSusChem 11 3184 Google Scholar
[69]	Yoshima K, Harada Y, Takami N 2016 J. Power Sources 302 283 Google Scholar
[70]	Gambe Y, Sun Y, Honma I 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 8869 Google Scholar
[71]	Kim S W, Cho K Y 2015 J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 6 1 Google Scholar
[72]	Zhao N, Khokhar W, Bi Z J, Shi C, Guo X X, Fan L Z, Nan C W 2019 Joule 3 1190 Google Scholar
[73]	Yang X F, Zhang H Z, Chen Y Q, Yu Y, Li X F, Zhang H M 2017 Nano Energy 39 418 Google Scholar
[74]	Yang X F, Chen Y Q, Wang M R, Zhang H Z, Li X F, Zhang H M 2016 Adv. Funct. Mater. 26 8427 Google Scholar
[75]	Yang X F, Sun Q, Zhao C T, Gao X, Adair K R, Liu Y L, Luo J, Lin X T, Liang J N, Huang H, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S G, Li R Y, Sun X L 2019 Nano Energy 61 567 Google Scholar
[76]	Wu X S, Xia S X, Huang Y Q, Hu X C, Yuan B, Chen S J, Yu Y, Liu W 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1903961 Google Scholar
[77]	Cao C T, Toney M F, Sham S K, Harder R, Shearing P R, Xiao X H, Wang J J 2020 Mater. Today 34 132 Google Scholar
[78]	Wang L G, Wang J J, Zuo P J 2018 Small Methods 2 1700293 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 (a) 常见氧化物与硫化物固体电解质的热力学稳定窗口^[17]; (b) Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂的热力学稳定窗口第一性原理计算结果^[18]

Fig. 1. (a) The thermodynamics stable window of oxide and sulfide solid electrolytes^[17]; (b) the first principles calculation results of the thermodynamics stable window of Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂^[18].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 (a) 不同尺寸的锂镧锆钽氧(LLZTO)颗粒与聚环氧乙烯(PEO)制备复合电解质的室温离子电导率与LLZTO添加量的关系^[23]; (b) LLZO-PEO复合电解质内部界面结构示意图; (c) LLZO与PEO界面的空间电荷层连接成快速离子传输通道的示意图; LLZO-PEO复合电解质内形成渗流通道的过程: LLZO添加量小于渗流阈值(d); 到达渗流阈值(e)和超过渗流阈值(f)的示意图^[24]

Fig. 2. (a) The Li⁺ conductivity of LLZTO/PEO composite electrolytes as a function of different particle sizes and volume fractions of LLZTO^[23]; (b) schematic diagram of LLZO nanoparticle in the PEO composite electrolyte; (c) the fast ionic conduction pathway along the space charge regions. Schematics illustration of the percolation behavior along the LLZTO/PEO interface: (d) Volume fraction of LLZO is less than the percolation threshold; (e) the onset and (f) the disruption of the percolation^[24].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 有无Li₂CO₃的LLZO与PEO形成复合电解质膜的　(a)离子电导率; (b)电化学窗口; (c)锂离子迁移数的对比; (d)Li₂CO₃对复合电解质中锂离子传输途径影响的示意图^[26]

Fig. 3. Comparation of (a) ionic conductivities; (b) electrochemical windows and (c) Li⁺ transference numbers of LLZO/PEO composite electrolyte with and without Li₂CO₃ on LLZO surfaces; (d) schematic illustration of the Li₂CO₃ coatings on the Li⁺ conduction pathway in the LLZO/PEO composite electrolytes^[26].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 (a) “刚柔并济”的有机无机复合电解质膜的构建思路^[32]; (b) “ceramic-in-polymer”(CIP)和“polymer-in-ceramic”(PIC)复合电解质膜的结构示意图^[33]; (c) 以CIP为外层、以PIC为内层的“外柔内刚”分级复合电解质膜^[34]

Fig. 4. (a) Schematics illustration of the rigid-flexible organic/inorganic composite electrolyte^[32]; (b) “ceramic-in-polymer” (CIP) and “polymer-in-ceramic” (PIC) composite electrolyte^[33]; and (c) hierarchical sandwich-type composite electrolytes^[34].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 (a) 采用传统电极涂布法制备的固态复合正极及其充放电曲线^[12]; (b) LLZO/LiCoO₂界面发生元素互扩散形成四方相LLZO^[13]; (c) 引入低熔点助烧剂Li_2.3C_0.7B_0.3O₃(LCBO)后, LLZO与LiCoO₂形成离子导电的稳定界面^[36]; (d) 金属Nb中间层有效抑制LLZO与LiCoO₂间的元素互扩散^[37]; (e) 结合表面包覆和原位电化学法在固态正极中形成离子电子共导电网络^[38]

Fig. 5. (a) Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves and cross-sectional SEM of the solid garnet batteries with the slurry-casting composite cathodes^[12]; (b) three-dimensional element mapping of the LLZO /LiCoO₂ interface enabled by TOF-SIMS^[13]; (c) Ionic-conducting LLZO/LiCoO₂ interfaces were achieved by introducing low melting-point Li_2.3C_0.7B_0.3O₃ (LCBO) ^[36]; (d) cross-sectional STEM image of a Nb-modified interface between LLZO and LiCoO₂^[37]; (e) illustration of the composite cathode configuration with garnet partially coated LiCoO₂ and ionic liquid intermediate layer^[38].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 (a)硫化物电解质/氧化物正极材料界面^[44]; (b)氧化物固体电解质/氧化物正极材料界面的空间电荷层示意图^[45]; (c) LiV₂O₅/LAGP和(d) Li₂V₂O₅/LAGP界面的空间电荷层与对应的固态核磁共振交换谱^[46]

Fig. 6. Schematics of the space-charge layer effect at the interface between (a) sulfide electrolyte and oxide cathode^[44]; (b) the interface between oxide electrolyte and oxide cathode^[45]. Illustration of space-charge layer effect on Li⁺ transport between (c) LiV₂O₅/LAGP and (d) Li₂V₂O₅/LAGP interfaces with the determination of activation energy of Li⁺ exchange enabled by ⁶Li 2-D exchange NMR spectrum^[46].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 (a) LiCoO₂固态复合正极与LLZO陶瓷片界面在循环后发生开裂造成界面阻抗显著增加^[47]; (b) 以具有弹性的无机离子导体Li_2.985B_0.005OCl作为低熔点助烧剂制备的块体陶瓷型固态锂电池^[48]

Fig. 7. (a) Cross-sectional SEM image and impedance spectra of all-solid-state batteries after cycling which indicate the cracks of the solid-solid interface between the composite cathode and LLZO ceramics pellet^[47]; (b) illustration of garnet-based all-ceramic Li battery enabled by high-1 elastic Li_2.985B_0.005OCl solder^[48].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 (a) 低致密度且有晶格缺陷的LLZO陶瓷电解质示意图^[52]; (b) 表面碳酸锂等污染物对LLZO陶瓷亲锂性的影响; (c) 理想的纯离子导体中间层有效抑制金属锂贯穿, (d) 在LLZO陶瓷电解质近锂侧掺Ti, 在陶瓷本体部分形成混合离子电子导电界面起到均匀化电场、阻挡电子注入和抑制锂成核等作用^[53]

Fig. 8. (a) Illustration of low-dense LLZO ceramic with lattice defects^[52]; (b) the wettability of Li metal against LLZO ceramic electrolyte with Li₂CO₃ contamination; (c) the inhabitation effect of Li-penetration with ionically conducting intermediate layer; (d) Ti-doping electronic/ionic interphase is formed at the lithium anode side to homogenize local electrical field and hinder the e^– infiltration, which is effective to inhibit the Li-penetration through LLZO ceramic pellet^[53].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 (a) 锂贯穿LLZO陶瓷电解质的微观形态分析^[57]; (b) LLZO/Li负极界面应力累积程度的简化模型^[58]; (c) 硅负极/固体电解质界面应力应变产生的化学-力学耦合机制^[59]; (d)柔性复合固态电解质缓解硅负极产生的应力应变问题^[60]

Fig. 9. (a) Morphology of LLZO ceramic pellet after Li penetration^[57]; (b) simplified model of a Li filament in a solid electrolyte which predicts the aggerating stress at Li/LLZO interface^[58]; (c) chemo-mechanical coupling mechanism that cause strain/stress at the interface between Si anode and solid electrolyte^[59]; (d) illustration of the flexible and rigid interfaces between Si anode and flexible composite electrolyte which alleviate the interfacial strain/stress ^[60].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 (a) NASICON型氧化物固体电解质LAGP陶瓷片与金属锂的热稳定性研究^[61]; (b)采用加速量热仪研究LAGP, LATP, LLTO与LLZO四种氧化物固体电解质与金属锂接触时的热稳定性^[62]

Fig. 10. (a) Thermal stability between lithium metal and NASICON-type LAGP solid electrolyte^[61]; (b) accelerating rate calorimeter test results of four oxide electrolytes and Li metals, and schematics of the thermal runaway reaction between oxide electrolyte and Li metal^[62].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 能量密度大于400 Wh/kg的石榴石型固态电池开发策略^[64]‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Fig. 11. Development strategies of solid garnet batteries with energy density higher than 400 Wh kg^-1^[64].‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 (a)由LMFP正极、LLZO基混合电解质层和LTO负极组成的双极性准固态电池的截面示意图和截面SEM图像^[69]; (b)集流体Al和Cu的稳定电位范围以及Cu/Al双极性集流体的示意图^[65,69]

Fig. 12. (a) Cross-sectional illustration and SEM images of bipolar quasi-solid-state batteries with LMFP cathode, LLZO-based hybrid electrolyte and LTO anode^[69]; (b) the electrochemical stable window of Al foil and Cu foil, and the schematics of Cu/Al bipolar current collector^[65,69].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 (a)固体电解质(solid state electrolyte, SSE)与固态正负极以及双极性集流体(bipolar current collector, BCC)组成双极性电池结构的固态电池示意图; (b)基于双极性电池结构, 四种固体电解质(LiPON、硫化物、LLZO陶瓷电解质与LLZO复合电解质)厚度与质量能量密度的关系, (c)固态复合正极的载量与质量能量密度的关系^[64]‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Fig. 13. (a) Schematics of bipolar solid-state batteries composed of solid-state electrolyte (SSE), cathode, anode and bipolar current collector (BCC). (b) Based on bipolar battery architecture, the gravimetric energy density as a function of thickness of four solid electrolytes (LiPON, sulfide, LLZO ceramic electrolyte and LLZO composite electrolyte), and (c) the mass loading of composite cathode^[64].‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 石榴石型固态锂电池中的关键物理问题(内嵌图出自参考文献)

Fig. 14. Key physical issues involved in solid garnet batteries (the insets excerpted from references).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	张舒, 王少飞, 凌仕刚, 高健, 吴娇杨, 肖睿娟, 李泓, 陈立泉 2014 储能科学与技术 3 376 Google Scholar Zhang S, Wang S F, Ling S G, Gao J, Wu J Y, Xiao R J, Li H, Chen L Q 2014 Energy Storage Sci. Tech. 3 376 Google Scholar
[2]	Judez X, Eshetu G G, Li C, Rodriguez-Martinez L M, Zhang H, Armand M 2018 Joule 2 2208 Google Scholar
[3]	Liu J, Bao Z N, Cui Y, Dufek E J, Goodenough J B, Khalifah P, Li Q Y, Liaw B Y, Liu P, Manthiram A, Meng Y S, Subramanian V R, Toney M F, Viswanathan V V, Whittingham M S, Xiao J, Xu W, Yang J H, Yang X Q, Zhang J G 2019 Nat. Energy 4 180 Google Scholar
[4]	Randau S, Weber D A, Kötz O, Koerver R, Braun P, Weber A, Ivers-Tiffée E, Adermann T, Kulisch J, Zeier W G, Richter F H, Janek J 2020 Nat. Energy 5 259 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang C, Fu K, Kammampata S P, McOwen D W, Samson A J, Zhang L, Hitz G T, Nolan A M, Wachsman E D, Mo Y, Thangadurai V, Hu L 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 4257 Google Scholar
[6]	Samson A J, Hofstetter K, Bag S, Thangadurai V 2019 Energy Environ. Sci. 12 2957 Google Scholar
[7]	郑碧珠, 王红春, 马嘉林, 龚正良, 杨勇 2017 中国科学: 化学 47 579 Google Scholar Zheng B Z, Wang H C, Ma J L, Gong Z L, Yang Y 2017 Sci. Sin. Chim. 47 579 Google Scholar
[8]	Ramakumar S, Deviannapoorani C, Dhivya L, Shankar L S, Murugan R 2017 Prog. Mater Sci. 88 325 Google Scholar
[9]	Guo S J, Sun Y G, Cao A M 2020 Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 36 329 Google Scholar
[10]	Famprikis T, Canepa P, Dawson J A, Islam M S, Masquelier C 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1278 Google Scholar
[11]	Murugan R, Thangadurai V, Weppner W 2007 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 7778 Google Scholar
[12]	Du F M, Zhao N, Li Y Q, Chen C, Liu Z W, Guo X X 2015 J. Power Sources 300 24 Google Scholar
[13]	Park K, Yu B, Jung J W, Li Y T, Zhou W D, Gao H C, Son S, Goodenough J B 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 8051 Google Scholar
[14]	Monroe C, Newman J 2005 J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 A396 Google Scholar
[15]	Zou Z Y, Li Y J, Lu Z H, Wang D, Cui Y H, Guo B K, Li Y J, Liang X M, Feng J W, Li H, Nan C W, Armand M, Chen L Q, Xu K, Shi S Q 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 4169 Google Scholar
[16]	Wan J, Xie J, Mackanic D G, Burke W, Bao Z, Cui Y 2018 Mater. Today Nano 4 1 Google Scholar
[17]	Zhu Y Z, He X F, Mo Y F 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 3253 Google Scholar
[18]	Han F D, Zhu Y Z, He X F, Mo Y F, Wang C S 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1501590 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhuang Y, Zou Z Y, Lu B, Li Y J, Wang D, Avdeev M, Shi S Q 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 068202 Google Scholar
[20]	Xiong Z H, Shi S Q, Ouyang C Y, Lei M S, Hu L Y, Ji Y H, Wang Z X, Chen L Q 2005 Phys. Lett. A 337 247 Google Scholar
[21]	Shi S Q, Gao J, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Wu Q, Ju W W, Ouyang C Y, Xiao R J 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 018212 Google Scholar
[22]	Qin S Y, Zhu X H, Jiang Y, Ling M E, Hu Z W, Zhu J L 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 113901 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang J X, Zhao N, Zhang M, Li Y Q, Chu P K, Guo X X, Di Z F, Wang X, Li H 2016 Nano Energy 28 447 Google Scholar
[24]	Li Z, Huang H M, Zhu J K, Wu J F, Yang H, Wei L, Guo X 2019 ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11 784 Google Scholar
[25]	Huang Z Y, Pang W Y, Liang P, Jin Z H, Grundish N, Li Y T, Wang C A 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A 7 16425 Google Scholar
[26]	Huo H Y, Li X N, Sun Y P, Lin X T, Doyle-Davis K, Liang J W, Gao X J, Li R Y, Huang H, Guo X X, Sun X L 2020 Nano Energy 73 104836 Google Scholar
[27]	Huo H Y, Luo J, Thangadurai V, Guo X X, Nan C W, Sun X L 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 252 Google Scholar
[28]	Huo H Y, Chen Y, Zhao N, Lin X T, Luo J, Yang X F, Liu Y L, Guo X X, Sun X L 2019 Nano Energy 61 119 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhou W D, Wang S F, Li Y T, Xin S, Manthiram A, Goodenough J B 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 9385 Google Scholar
[30]	Cheng L, Crumlin E J, Chen W, Qiao R, Hou H, Franz Lux S, Zorba V, Russo R, Kostecki R, Liu Z, Persson K, Yang W, Cabana J, Richardson T, Chen G, Doeff M 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 18294 Google Scholar
[31]	Zhang J J, Zang X, Wen H J, Dong T T, Chai J C, Li Y, Chen B B, Zhao J W, Dong S M, Ma J, Yue L P, Liu Z H, Guo X X, Cui G L, Chen L Q 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 4940 Google Scholar
[32]	Yu X R, Wang L L, Ma J, Sun X W, Zhou X H, Cui G L 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903939 Google Scholar
[33]	Chen L, Li Y T, Li S P, Fan L Z, Nan C W, Goodenough J B 2018 Nano Energy 46 176 Google Scholar
[34]	Huo H Y, Chen Y, Luo J, Yang X F, Guo X X, Sun X L 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1804004 Google Scholar
[35]	Syzdek J S, Armand M, Gizowska M, Marcinek M, Sasim E, Szafran M, Wieczorek W 2009 J. Power Sources 194 66 Google Scholar
[36]	Han F D, Yue J, Chen C, Zhao N, Fan X L, Ma Z H, Gao T, Wang F, Guo X X, Wang C S 2018 Joule 2 497 Google Scholar
[37]	Kato T, Hamanaka T, Yamamoto K, Hirayama T, Sagane F, Motoyama M, Iriyama Y 2014 J. Power Sources 260 292 Google Scholar
[38]	Bi Z J, Zhao N, Ma L N, Fu Z Q, Xu F F, Wang C S, Guo X X 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 387 124089 Google Scholar
[39]	Vardar G, Bowman W J, Lu Q Y, Wang J Y, Chater R J, Aguadero A, Seibert R, Terry J, Hunt A, Waluyo I, Fong D D, Jarry A, Crumlin E J, Hellstrom S L, Chiang Y M, Yildiz B 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 6259 Google Scholar
[40]	Bi Z J, Zhao N, Ma L, Shi C, Fu Z Q, Xu F F, Guo X X 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 4252 Google Scholar
[41]	Du F M, Zhao N, Fang R, Cui Z H, Li Y Q, Guo X X 2018 J. Inorg. Mater. 33 462 Google Scholar
[42]	Zhang N, Long X H, Wang Z, Yu P F, Han F D, Fu J M, Ren G X, Wu Y R, Zheng S, Huang W C, Wang C S, Li H, Liu X S 2018 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1 5968 Google Scholar
[43]	Ren Y Y, Liu T, Shen Y, Lin Y H, Nan C W 2016 J. Materiomics 2 256 Google Scholar
[44]	Haruyama J, Sodeyama K, Han L, Takada K, Tateyama Y 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 4248 Google Scholar
[45]	de Klerk N J J, Wagemaker M 2018 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1 5609 Google Scholar
[46]	Cheng Z, Liu M, Ganapathy S, Li C, Li Z L, Zhang X Y, He P, Zhou H S, Wagemaker M 2020 Joule 4 1311 Google Scholar
[47]	Liu T, Zhang Y B, Chen R J, Zhao S X, Lin Y H, Nan C W, Shen Y 2017 Electrochem. Commun. 79 1 Google Scholar
[48]	Wu Liang Feng, Zheng Zhe Lai, Xiao Li Dong, Pan Long Li, Yong Gang Wang, Xia Y Y 2020 iScience 23 101071 Google Scholar
[49]	van den Broek J, Afyon S, Rupp J L M 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1600736 Google Scholar
[50]	Panahian Jand S, Kaghazchi P 2018 MRS Commun. 8 591 Google Scholar
[51]	Khokhar W A, Zhao N, Huang W L, Wang H, Bi Z J, Guo X X 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. InterfacesGoogle Scholar
[52]	Huang W L, Zhao N, Bi Z J, Shi C, Guo X X, Fan L Z, Nan C W 2020 Mater. Today Nano 10 100075 Google Scholar
[53]	Gao J, Zhu J X, Li X L, Li J P, Guo X X, Li H, Zhou W D 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 2001918 Google Scholar
[54]	Wu J F, Pu B W, Wang D, Shi S Q, Zhao N, Guo X X, Guo X 2019 ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11 898 Google Scholar
[55]	Li Y T, Chen X, Dolocan A, Cui Z M, Xin S, Xue L G, Xu H H, Park K, Goodenough J B 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 6448 Google Scholar
[56]	Sharafi A, Kazyak E, Davis A L, Yu S, Thompson T, Siegel D J, Dasgupta N P, Sakamoto J 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 7961 Google Scholar
[57]	Kazyak E, Garcia-Mendez R, LePage W S, Sharafi A, Davis A L, Sanchez A J, Chen K H, Haslam C, Sakamoto J, Dasgupta N P 2020 Matter 2 1025 Google Scholar
[58]	Porz L, Swamy T, Sheldon B W, Rettenwander D, Frömling T, Thaman H L, Berendts S, Uecker R, Carter W C, Chiang Y M 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1701003 Google Scholar
[59]	Tian H-K, Chakraborty A, Talin A A, Eisenlohr P, Qi Y 2020 J. Electrochem. Soc. 167 090541 Google Scholar
[60]	Huo H Y, Sun J Y, Chen C, Meng X L, He M H, Zhao N, Guo X X 2018 J. Power Sources 383 150 Google Scholar
[61]	Chung H, Kang B 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 8611 Google Scholar
[62]	Chen R S, Nolan A M, Lu J Z, Wang J Y, Yu X Q, Mo Y F, Chen L Q, Huang X J, Li H 2020 Joule 4 812 Google Scholar
[63]	Wolfenstine J, Allen J L, Read J, Sakamoto J 2013 J. Mater. Sci. 48 5846 Google Scholar
[64]	Jia M Y, Zhao N, Huo H Y, Guo X X 2020 Electrochem. Energy Rev.Google Scholar
[65]	Jung K N, Shin H S, Park M S, Lee J W 2019 ChemElectroChem 6 3842 Google Scholar
[66]	Famprikis T, Canepa P, Dawson J A, Islam M S, Masquelier C 2019 Nature Materials 18 1278
[67]	Wei Z Y, Chen S J, Wang J Y, Wang Z H, Zhang Z H, Yao X Y, Deng Y H, Xu X X 2018 J. Power Sources 394 57 Google Scholar
[68]	Shin H S, Ryu W G, Park M S, Jung K N, Kim H, Lee J W 2018 ChemSusChem 11 3184 Google Scholar
[69]	Yoshima K, Harada Y, Takami N 2016 J. Power Sources 302 283 Google Scholar
[70]	Gambe Y, Sun Y, Honma I 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 8869 Google Scholar
[71]	Kim S W, Cho K Y 2015 J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 6 1 Google Scholar
[72]	Zhao N, Khokhar W, Bi Z J, Shi C, Guo X X, Fan L Z, Nan C W 2019 Joule 3 1190 Google Scholar
[73]	Yang X F, Zhang H Z, Chen Y Q, Yu Y, Li X F, Zhang H M 2017 Nano Energy 39 418 Google Scholar
[74]	Yang X F, Chen Y Q, Wang M R, Zhang H Z, Li X F, Zhang H M 2016 Adv. Funct. Mater. 26 8427 Google Scholar
[75]	Yang X F, Sun Q, Zhao C T, Gao X, Adair K R, Liu Y L, Luo J, Lin X T, Liang J N, Huang H, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S G, Li R Y, Sun X L 2019 Nano Energy 61 567 Google Scholar
[76]	Wu X S, Xia S X, Huang Y Q, Hu X C, Yuan B, Chen S J, Yu Y, Liu W 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1903961 Google Scholar
[77]	Cao C T, Toney M F, Sham S K, Harder R, Shearing P R, Xiao X H, Wang J J 2020 Mater. Today 34 132 Google Scholar
[78]	Wang L G, Wang J J, Zuo P J 2018 Small Methods 2 1700293 Google Scholar

[1]	李梅, 钟淑英, 胡军平, 孙宝珍, 徐波. 固态电解质Li_1+xAl_xTi_2–x (PO₄)₃中 Li⁺的迁移特性. 物理学报, 2024, 73(13): 138201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240044
[2]	华彪, 孙宝珍, 王靖轩, 石晶, 徐波. Li含量对Li_3xLa_(2/3)–x†_(1/3)–2xTiO₃固态电解质表面稳定性、电子结构及Li离子输运性质的影响. 物理学报, 2023, 72(2): 028201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221808
[3]	耿晓彬, 李顶根, 徐波. 固态电解质电池锂枝晶生长机械应力-热力学相场模拟研究. 物理学报, 2023, 72(22): 220201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230824
[4]	何兵, 练宇翔, 吴木生, 罗文崴, 杨慎博, 欧阳楚英. 阳离子调控对卤化物固态电解质性能的改善. 物理学报, 2022, 71(20): 208201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221050
[5]	游逸玮, 崔建文, 张小锋, 郑锋, 吴顺情, 朱梓忠. 锂磷氧氮(LiPON)固态电解质与Li负极界面特性. 物理学报, 2021, 70(13): 136801. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202214
[6]	邵光伟, 郭珊珊, 于瑞, 陈南梁, 叶美丹, 刘向阳. 可拉伸超级电容器的研究进展:电极、电解质和器件. 物理学报, 2020, 69(17): 178801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200881
[7]	冯吴亮, 王飞, 周星, 吉晓, 韩福东, 王春生. 固态电解质与电极界面的稳定性. 物理学报, 2020, 69(22): 228206. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201554
[8]	张念, 任国玺, 章辉, 周櫈, 刘啸嵩. 石榴石型固态电解质表界面问题及优化的研究进展. 物理学报, 2020, 69(22): 228806. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201533
[9]	曹文卓, 李泉, 王胜彬, 李文俊, 李泓. 金属锂在固态电池中的沉积机理、策略及表征. 物理学报, 2020, 69(22): 228204. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201293
[10]	刘玉龙, 辛明杨, 丛丽娜, 谢海明. 聚氧乙烯基聚合物固态电池的界面研究进展. 物理学报, 2020, 69(22): 228202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201588
[11]	余启鹏, 刘琦, 王自强, 李宝华. 全固态金属锂电池负极界面问题及解决策略. 物理学报, 2020, 69(22): 228805. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201218
[12]	彭林峰, 曾子琪, 孙玉龙, 贾欢欢, 谢佳. 富钠反钙钛矿型固态电解质的简易合成与电化学性能. 物理学报, 2020, 69(22): 228201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201227
[13]	张桥保, 龚正良, 杨勇. 硫化物固态电解质材料界面及其表征的研究进展. 物理学报, 2020, 69(22): 228803. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201581
[14]	陈棋, 尚学府, 张鹏, 徐鹏, 王淼, 今西誠之. 流延法制备高锂离子电导Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3固态电解质及其环氧树脂改性. 物理学报, 2017, 66(18): 188201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.188201
[15]	郭立强, 陶剑, 温娟, 程广贵, 袁宁一, 丁建宁. 玉米淀粉固态电解质质子\电子杂化突触晶体管. 物理学报, 2017, 66(16): 168501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.168501
[16]	郭立强, 温娟, 程广贵, 袁宁一, 丁建宁. 基于KH550-GO固态电解质中电容耦合作用的双侧栅IZO薄膜晶体管. 物理学报, 2016, 65(17): 178501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.178501
[17]	郭文昊, 肖惠, 门传玲. SiO2固态电解质中的质子特性对氧化物双电层薄膜晶体管性能的影响. 物理学报, 2015, 64(7): 077302. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.077302
[18]	袁望治, 黎文辉, 袁望曦, 王大志. 固体电解质蒙脱石结构与电导性能研究. 物理学报, 1990, 39(6): 98-104. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.98
[19]	俞文海, 丁屹. 固体电解质与电极之间界面的分数维模型及其频率响应. 物理学报, 1989, 38(10): 1621-1627. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.1621
[20]	朱斌, 王大志, 俞文海. 蒙脱石固体电解质的高价离子导电性. 物理学报, 1988, 37(8): 1307-1314. doi: 10.7498/aps.37.1307

计量

文章访问数: 13088
PDF下载量: 490
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

石榴石型固态锂电池中的物理问题