搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

声学蜂窝结构中的拓扑角态

胡军容 孔鹏 毕仁贵 邓科 赵鹤平

引用本文:
Citation:

声学蜂窝结构中的拓扑角态

胡军容, 孔鹏, 毕仁贵, 邓科, 赵鹤平

Topological corner states in acoustic honeycomb structure

Hu Jun-Rong, Kong Peng, Bi Ren-Gui, Deng Ke, Zhao He-Ping
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 高阶拓扑绝缘体是近年来发现的一类具有特殊拓扑相的新型拓扑绝缘体, 目前已在光学、声学等多种经典波系统中实现. 本文采用数值模拟方法研究了一种二维声学蜂窝结构, 通过调节胞内和胞间耦合波导管, 使体能带发生反转诱导拓扑相变, 进而利用拓扑相构建出声学二阶拓扑绝缘体. 蜂窝结构的拓扑性质可以用量子化的四极矩$ {Q_{ij}} $表征, 当$ {Q_{ij}} = 0 $时, 系统是平庸的; 而当$ {Q_{ij}} = 1/2 $时, 系统是拓扑的. 基于该蜂窝结构, 分别研究了六边形和三角形结构的声学高阶态, 在两种构型的蜂窝结构中均观测到了孤立的零维角态, 研究结果表明只有存在钝角的六边形结构对缺陷具有鲁棒性, 受拓扑保护. 本文的拓扑角态丰富了高阶拓扑绝缘体的研究, 同时可为紧凑声学系统中的鲁棒限制声提供一条新途径.
    In recent years, a new type of topological insulator, termed higher-order topological insulator, has attracted tremendous research interest. Such exotic lower-dimensional topological boundary states have been extended and reproduced in classical systems, such as optics and acoustics. In this paper, a two-dimensional acoustic honeycomb structure with a triangle resonant cavity is numerically studied. Topological phase transition is induced by gradually adjusting the intracell and intercell coupling, and then the topological phase is used to construct a second-order topological insulator. The topological properties of second-order topological insulators can be characterized by using the quantized quadrupole moments. When quantized quadrupole $ {Q_{ij}} = 0 $, the system is trivial, while $ {Q_{ij}} = 1/2 $, the system is topologically nontrivial. We investigate the acoustical higher-order states of triangular and hexagonal structures, respectively. The gapped zero-dimensional corner states are observed in both structures, but the robustness properties of the corner states emerge only in the hexagonal structures but not in the triangular-shaped ones. The topological corner modes will offer a new way to robustly confine the sound in a compact acoustic system.
      通信作者: 孔鹏, kongpeng@jsu.edu.cn ; 邓科, dengke@jsu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金 (批准号: 11964011, 11764016)、湖南省教育厅科研基金(批准号: 20C1530)和吉首大学基金(批准号: Jdy20026)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Kong Peng, kongpeng@jsu.edu.cn ; Deng Ke, dengke@jsu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11964011, 11764016), the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 20C1530), and the Jishou University Foundation, China (Grant No. Jdy20026).
    [1]

    Zangeneh-Nejad F, Alu A, Fleury R 2020 CR. Phys. 21 467

    [2]

    Klitzing K v, Dorda G, Pepper M 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 494Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang Z, Chong Y D, Joannopoulos J D, Soljacic M 2009 Nature 461 772Google Scholar

    [4]

    He C, Ni X, Ge H, Sun X C, Chen Y B, Lu M H, Liu X P, Chen Y F 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 1124Google Scholar

    [5]

    Lu J, Qiu C, Ke M, Liu Z 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 093901Google Scholar

    [6]

    严忠波 2019 物理学报 68 226101Google Scholar

    Yan Z B 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 226101Google Scholar

    [7]

    Bao J, Zou D, Zhang W, He W, Sun H, Zhang X 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 201406(RGoogle Scholar

    [8]

    Zheng S, Xia B, Man X, Tong L, Jiao J, Duan G, Yu D 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 104113Google Scholar

    [9]

    El Hassan A, Kunst F K, Moritz A, Andler G, Bergholtz E J, Bourennane M 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 697Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xie B Y, Su G X, Wang H F, Su H, Shen X P, Zhan P, Lu M H, Wang Z L, Chen Y F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 233903Google Scholar

    [11]

    Benalcazar W A, Bernevig B A, Hughes T L 2017 Science 357 61Google Scholar

    [12]

    Mittal S, Orre V V, Zhu G, Gorlach M A, Poddubny A, Hafezi M 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 692Google Scholar

    [13]

    Qi Y, Qiu C, Xiao M, He H, Ke M, Liu Z 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 206601Google Scholar

    [14]

    Imhof S, Berger C, Bayer F, Brehm J, Molenkamp L W, Kiessling T, Schindler F, Lee C H, Greiter M, Neupert T, Thomale R 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 925Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ezawa M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 026801Google Scholar

    [16]

    Xue H, Yang Y, Gao F, Chong Y, Zhang B 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 108Google Scholar

    [17]

    Ni X, Weiner M, Alu A, Khanikaev A B 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 113Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wu J, Huang X, Lu J, Wu Y, Deng W, Li F, Liu Z 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 104109Google Scholar

    [19]

    Liu F, Wakabayashi K 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 076803Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhang Z, Rosendo López M, Cheng Y, Liu X, Christensen J 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 195501Google Scholar

    [21]

    Chen Z-G, Xu C, Al Jahdali R, Mei J, Wu Y 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 075120Google Scholar

    [22]

    Fan H, Xia B, Tong L, Zheng S, Yu D 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 204301Google Scholar

    [23]

    Liu F, Deng H Y, Wakabayashi K 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 086804Google Scholar

    [24]

    Yang Y, Jia Z, Wu Y, Xiao R-C, Hang Z H, Jiang H, Xie X C 2020 Sci. Bull. 65 531Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang Z, Hu B, Liu F, Cheng Y, Liu X, Christensen J 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 220102(RGoogle Scholar

    [26]

    Zhang Z, Wei Q, Cheng Y, Zhang T, Wu D, Liu X 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 084303Google Scholar

    [27]

    Wu L H, Hu X 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 223901Google Scholar

    [28]

    Liu F, Yamamoto M, Wakabayashi K 2017 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86 123707Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yang Z Z, Li X, Peng Y Y, Zou X Y, Cheng J C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 255502Google Scholar

    [30]

    Jiho N, Hassan A, Benalcazar W A, Huang S, Collins M J, Chen K P, Hughes T L 2018 Nat. Photon. 12 408Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)声学蜂窝结构, 蓝色区域表示单胞; (b)单胞三维结构图; (c)单胞二维结构放大图; (d)单胞对应的第一布里渊区, ${{\boldsymbol{b}}_1}$${{\boldsymbol{b}}_2}$为倒格子基矢, 其中${{{{\boldsymbol{b}}}}_1} = {{2{\text{π }}}}/{a}( 0, {{2\sqrt 3 }}/{3} )$, ${{{{\boldsymbol{b}}}}_2} = {{2{\text{π }}}}/{a}( {1, {{\sqrt 3 }}/{3}} )$

    Fig. 1.  (a) Acoustic honeycomb structure, theunit cell depicted in blue areas; (b) three-dimensional structure diagram of a unit cell; (c) enlarged image of two-dimensional structure a unit cell; (d) the first Brillouin zone (BZ) of the unit cell, where the reciprocal lattice vectors are ${{\boldsymbol{b}}_1} = {{2{\text{π }}}}/{a}( {0, {{2\sqrt 3 }}/{3}} )$ and ${{{{\boldsymbol{b}}}}_2} = {{2{\text{π }}}}/{a}( {1, {{\sqrt 3 }}/{3}} )$.

    图 2  (a)当${l_{{\text{inter}}}}/{l_{{\text{intra}}}} = 0.4,$ 1.0, 2.0时, 蜂窝结构的体能带, $ + \left( - \right) $号表示偶(奇)宇称; (b) $\varGamma$点的本征模式; $ {{\text{p}}_x} $$ {{\text{p}}_y} $表示赝自旋偶极模式, ${{\text{d}}_{xy}}$${{\text{d}}_{{x^2} - {y^2}}}$表示赝自旋四极模式; (c)拓扑相与能带反转; 蜂窝结构具有平庸相($ {l_{{\text{inter}}}}/{l_{{\text{intra}}}} < 1 $)和拓扑相($ {l_{{\text{inter}}}}/{l_{{\text{intra}}}} > 1 $); 从图中也可以清楚地看出能带反转伴随着拓扑相变

    Fig. 2.  (a) The bulk band of the honeycomb lattice when${l_{{\text{inter}}}}/{l_{{\text{intra}}}} = 0.4,$ 1.0, 2.0, ; $ + $and –, for even and odd parities, respectively; (b) the corresponding acoustic eigenmodesat the $\varGamma$point; $ {{\text{p}}_x} $and$ {{\text{p}}_y} $display pseudospin dipole modes, while ${{\text{d}}_{xy}}$and ${{\text{d}}_{{x^2} - {y^2}}}$mark pseudospinquadrupole modes; (c) topological phase and band inversion;The honeycomb structure has trivial phase ($ {l_{{\text{inter}}}}/{l_{{\text{intra}}}} < 1 $) and topological phase ($ {l_{{\text{inter}}}}/{l_{{\text{intra}}}} > 1 $); it can also be clearly seen from the figure that the band inversion is accompanied by a topological phase transition.

    图 3  (a)六边形蜂窝结构; (b)和(c)分别为拓扑和平庸六边形蜂窝结构的本征频谱; 黑色、蓝色和红色的点分别表示体态、边界态和角态. (d)—(f)分别为体态(1327.5 Hz)、边界态(1543.4 Hz)和角态(1566.1 Hz)的本征场分布. 在(f)的插图中给出了角点的顺时针箭头表示赝自旋向下, 符号$ “\pm ” $类似于拓扑荷

    Fig. 3.  (a) Hexagonal honeycomb structure; (b) and (c) are the frequency spectrum of the topological and trivial hexagonal honeycomb structure; the black, blue and red dots represent the bulk, edge and corner states, respectively. (d)–(f) The eigen fields distribution of bulk state (1327.5 Hz), edge state (1543.4 Hz) and corner state (1566.1 Hz). The inserted clockwise arrow represents the spin-down pseudospin. The $ “+(–)” $signs are similar to the topological charge on the corners.

    图 4  (a)引入缺陷后的六边形蜂窝结构; (b)频谱; (c)角态(1592.5 Hz)的本征场分布

    Fig. 4.  (a) Hexagonal honeycomb structure with defects introduced; (b) frequency spectrum; (c) the eigenfield distribution of corner state (1592.5 Hz).

    图 5  (a)三角形蜂窝结构; (b)三角形蜂窝结构的本征频谱; (c)角态(1604.5 Hz)的本征场分布; (d)—(f)分别为引入缺陷后的三角形蜂窝结构、本征频谱和角态(1660.2 Hz)的本征场分布

    Fig. 5.  (a) Triangular honeycomb structure; (b) the frequency spectrumof triangular honeycomb structure; (c) the eigenfield distribution of corner state (1604.5 Hz); (d)–(f) triangular honeycomb structure with defects introduced, frequency spectrum and the eigenfield distribution of corner state (1660.2 Hz).

  • [1]

    Zangeneh-Nejad F, Alu A, Fleury R 2020 CR. Phys. 21 467

    [2]

    Klitzing K v, Dorda G, Pepper M 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 494Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang Z, Chong Y D, Joannopoulos J D, Soljacic M 2009 Nature 461 772Google Scholar

    [4]

    He C, Ni X, Ge H, Sun X C, Chen Y B, Lu M H, Liu X P, Chen Y F 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 1124Google Scholar

    [5]

    Lu J, Qiu C, Ke M, Liu Z 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 093901Google Scholar

    [6]

    严忠波 2019 物理学报 68 226101Google Scholar

    Yan Z B 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 226101Google Scholar

    [7]

    Bao J, Zou D, Zhang W, He W, Sun H, Zhang X 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 201406(RGoogle Scholar

    [8]

    Zheng S, Xia B, Man X, Tong L, Jiao J, Duan G, Yu D 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 104113Google Scholar

    [9]

    El Hassan A, Kunst F K, Moritz A, Andler G, Bergholtz E J, Bourennane M 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 697Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xie B Y, Su G X, Wang H F, Su H, Shen X P, Zhan P, Lu M H, Wang Z L, Chen Y F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 233903Google Scholar

    [11]

    Benalcazar W A, Bernevig B A, Hughes T L 2017 Science 357 61Google Scholar

    [12]

    Mittal S, Orre V V, Zhu G, Gorlach M A, Poddubny A, Hafezi M 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 692Google Scholar

    [13]

    Qi Y, Qiu C, Xiao M, He H, Ke M, Liu Z 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 206601Google Scholar

    [14]

    Imhof S, Berger C, Bayer F, Brehm J, Molenkamp L W, Kiessling T, Schindler F, Lee C H, Greiter M, Neupert T, Thomale R 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 925Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ezawa M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 026801Google Scholar

    [16]

    Xue H, Yang Y, Gao F, Chong Y, Zhang B 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 108Google Scholar

    [17]

    Ni X, Weiner M, Alu A, Khanikaev A B 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 113Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wu J, Huang X, Lu J, Wu Y, Deng W, Li F, Liu Z 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 104109Google Scholar

    [19]

    Liu F, Wakabayashi K 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 076803Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhang Z, Rosendo López M, Cheng Y, Liu X, Christensen J 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 195501Google Scholar

    [21]

    Chen Z-G, Xu C, Al Jahdali R, Mei J, Wu Y 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 075120Google Scholar

    [22]

    Fan H, Xia B, Tong L, Zheng S, Yu D 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 204301Google Scholar

    [23]

    Liu F, Deng H Y, Wakabayashi K 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 086804Google Scholar

    [24]

    Yang Y, Jia Z, Wu Y, Xiao R-C, Hang Z H, Jiang H, Xie X C 2020 Sci. Bull. 65 531Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang Z, Hu B, Liu F, Cheng Y, Liu X, Christensen J 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 220102(RGoogle Scholar

    [26]

    Zhang Z, Wei Q, Cheng Y, Zhang T, Wu D, Liu X 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 084303Google Scholar

    [27]

    Wu L H, Hu X 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 223901Google Scholar

    [28]

    Liu F, Yamamoto M, Wakabayashi K 2017 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86 123707Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yang Z Z, Li X, Peng Y Y, Zou X Y, Cheng J C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 255502Google Scholar

    [30]

    Jiho N, Hassan A, Benalcazar W A, Huang S, Collins M J, Chen K P, Hughes T L 2018 Nat. Photon. 12 408Google Scholar

  • [1] 刘畅, 王亚愚. 磁性拓扑绝缘体中的量子输运现象. 物理学报, 2023, 72(17): 177301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230690
    [2] 黄月蕾, 单寅飞, 杜灵杰, 杜瑞瑞. 拓扑激子绝缘体的实验进展. 物理学报, 2023, 72(17): 177101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230634
    [3] 孟雨欣, 赵漪凡, 李绍春. 褶皱状蜂窝结构的单层二维材料研究进展. 物理学报, 2021, 70(14): 148101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210638
    [4] 郭文锑, 黄璐, 许桂贵, 钟克华, 张健敏, 黄志高. 本征磁性拓扑绝缘体MnBi2Te4电子结构的压力应变调控. 物理学报, 2021, 70(4): 047101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201237
    [5] 许佳玲, 贾利云, 刘超, 吴佺, 赵领军, 马丽, 侯登录. Li(Na)AuS体系拓扑绝缘体材料的能带结构. 物理学报, 2021, 70(2): 027101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20200885
    [6] 方云团, 王张鑫, 范尔盼, 李小雪, 王洪金. 基于结构反转二维光子晶体的拓扑相变及拓扑边界态的构建. 物理学报, 2020, 69(18): 184101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200415
    [7] 裴东亮, 杨洮, 陈猛, 刘宇, 徐文帅, 张满弓, 姜恒, 王育人. 基于复合蜂窝结构的宽带周期与非周期声拓扑绝缘体. 物理学报, 2020, 69(2): 024302. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191454
    [8] 张志模, 张文号, 付英双. 二维拓扑绝缘体的扫描隧道显微镜研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(22): 226801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191631
    [9] 刘畅, 刘祥瑞. 强三维拓扑绝缘体与磁性拓扑绝缘体的角分辨光电子能谱学研究进展. 物理学报, 2019, 68(22): 227901. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191450
    [10] 贾鼎, 葛勇, 袁寿其, 孙宏祥. 基于蜂窝晶格声子晶体的双频带声拓扑绝缘体. 物理学报, 2019, 68(22): 224301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190951
    [11] 高艺璇, 张礼智, 张余洋, 杜世萱. 二维有机拓扑绝缘体的研究进展. 物理学报, 2018, 67(23): 238101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181711
    [12] 敬玉梅, 黄少云, 吴金雄, 彭海琳, 徐洪起. 三维拓扑绝缘体antidot阵列结构中的磁致输运研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(4): 047301. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172346
    [13] 郑圣洁, 夏百战, 刘亭亭, 于德介. 空间盘绕型声学超材料的亚波长拓扑谷自旋态. 物理学报, 2017, 66(22): 228101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.228101
    [14] 李兆国, 张帅, 宋凤麒. 拓扑绝缘体的普适电导涨落. 物理学报, 2015, 64(9): 097202. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.097202
    [15] 王青, 盛利. 磁场中的拓扑绝缘体边缘态性质. 物理学报, 2015, 64(9): 097302. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.097302
    [16] 曾伦武, 张浩, 唐中良, 宋润霞. 拓扑绝缘体椭球粒子的电磁散射. 物理学报, 2012, 61(17): 177303. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.177303
    [17] 关春颖, 苑立波. 六角蜂窝结构光子晶体异质结带隙特性研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(3): 1244-1247. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1244
    [18] 马建华, 孙璟兰, 孟祥建, 林 铁, 石富文, 褚君浩. SrTiO3金属-绝缘体-半导体结构的介电与界面特性. 物理学报, 2005, 54(3): 1390-1395. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1390
    [19] 宋庆功, 丛选忠, 张庆军, 莫文玲, 戴占海. 六角蜂窝晶格的有序结构. 物理学报, 2000, 49(10): 2011-2016. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2011
    [20] 屈卫星, 徐至展. 二阶离化对缀饰态稳定性的影响. 物理学报, 1993, 42(3): 373-378. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.373
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3794
  • PDF下载量:  288
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-10-05
  • 修回日期:  2021-11-15
  • 上网日期:  2022-01-26
  • 刊出日期:  2022-03-05

/

返回文章
返回