-
本文通过基于群论和图论的晶体结构随机预测方法(RG2), 搜索发现了3种新型二维SiP2同素异构体结构α-SiP2, β-SiP2, γ-SiP2, 并采用基于密度泛函理论的第一性原理方法研究了它们的稳定性和电子性质. 结果表明, 3种新型SiP2结构在热力学、动力学及机械力学方面均具有良好稳定性. 它们的电子结构具有满足光催化要求的带隙值, 且带隙可通过施加应变进行有效调制. 这使得3种新型SiP2异构体有望应用于纳米级光催化剂的设计与制作. 研究还发现, 3种新型二维SiP2同素异构体均具有较好的压电性质, 其中α-SiP2和β-SiP2异构体的压电系数大于h-BN, 且可与MoS2相比拟. 这些新型结构将有望被应用于制备纳米机电设备以实现微纳尺度的机-电转换和电-机传感与控制.Since the successful preparation of single-layer graphene in 2004, the two-dimensional (2D) materials have received widespread attention. Driven by this research upsurge, many kinds of 2D compound materials with different properties have been discovered one after another, and some of these 2D materials have a variety of allotropes, showing more abundant properties. Our computational studies focus on searching for new stable 2D SiP2 allotropes, and studying their binding energy, phonon dispersions, electronic band structures, strain-dependent bandgap modulation behaviors, piezoelectric properties, etc. In this paper, three novel 2D SiP2 allotrope structures, i.e. α-SiP2, β-SiP2, and γ-SiP2, are found by the random prediction method of crystal structure based on group theory and graph theory (RG2). Their stabilities and electronic properties are investigated by using the first-principles method based on the density functional theory. The results show that the three novel SiP2 structures are stable thermodynamically, dynamically and mechanically. Using the GW calculations, three novel SiP2 structures possess indirect band gaps of 2.62, 2.99 and 3.00 eV, respectively. Their band gaps are feasible to modulate effectively by applying strain. The band gaps of the three novel SiP2 isomers are reduced significantly when subjected to a large strainused, and the three novel SiP2 isomers exhibit indirect-to-direct bandgap transitions when experienced by a certain strain along the x-axis direction. These properties make them potential materials that are suitable for serving as nanoscale photocatalysts. Moreover, three SiP2 isomers have non-centrosymmetric crystal structures, which enable them to exhibit their piezoelectricities. Therefore, we study their piezoelectric properties by combining the Berry phase theory. Our studies show that three novel 2D SiP2 allotropes have good piezoelectric properties. The piezoelectric coefficient of the α-SiP2 isomer and the β-SiP2 isomer are both larger than that of h-BN, and they are comparable to the counterpart of MoS2. These novel structures promise to be used to fabricate nano-electromechanical devices for micro- and nano-scaled electromechanical conversion and electromechanical sensing and controlling.
-
Keywords:
- SiP2 allotropes /
- structural prediction /
- electronic properties /
- first principles
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[2] Zhang Y B, Tan Y W, Stormer H L, Kim P 2005 Nature 438 201Google Scholar
[3] Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz T F 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 136805Google Scholar
[4] Topsakal M, Aktuerk E, Ciraci S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 115442Google Scholar
[5] Cahangirov S, Topsakal M, Akturk E, Sahin H, Ciraci S 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 236804Google Scholar
[6] Li L, Yu Y, Ye G, Ge Q, Ou X, Wu H, Feng D, Chen, Xian H, Zhang Y B 2014 Nature Nanotechnology 9 372Google Scholar
[7] Liu H, Neal A T, Zhu Z, Luo Z, Xu X F, Tomanek D, Ye P D 2014 ACS Nano 8 4033Google Scholar
[8] Li T, Eugenio C, Daniele C, Carlo G, Marco F, Madan D, Alessandro M, Deji A 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 227Google Scholar
[9] Duerloo K-A N, Ong M T, Reed E J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3 2871Google Scholar
[10] Fazel S, Jae R H, Hong S K 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 22146Google Scholar
[11] Guo J, Liu Y, Ma Y, Zhu E B, Lee S, Lu Z X, Zhao Z P, Xu C H, Lee S J, Wu H, Kovnir K, Huang Y, Duan X F 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 e1705934Google Scholar
[12] Yang S X, Yang Y H, Wu M H, Hu C G, Shen W F, Gong Y J, Huang L, Jiang C H, Zhang Y Z, Ajayan P M 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1707379Google Scholar
[13] Zhou L Q, Guo Y, Zhao J J 2018 Physica E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 95 149Google Scholar
[14] Li L, Gong P L, Sheng D P, Wang S A, Wang W K, Zhu X D, Shi X Q, Wang F K, Han W, Yang S J, Liu K L, Li H Q, Zhai T Y 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 e1804541Google Scholar
[15] Wadsten T 1967 Acts Chem. Scand. 21 1374
[16] Matta S K, Zhang C, Jiao Y, O, Mullane A, Du A 2018 Nanoscale 10 6369Google Scholar
[17] Xu Y, Li Z, He C, Li J, Ouyang T, Zhang C, Tang C, Zhong J 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 023103Google Scholar
[18] Xi F, Yang H Y, Ling F, He C Z, Hou J R, Guo J Y, Li L M 2021 Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 1089Google Scholar
[19] Shi X Z, He C Y, Pickard C J, Tang C, Zhong J X 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 014104Google Scholar
[20] King-Smith R D, Vanderbilt D 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 1651Google Scholar
[21] Vanderbilt D 2000 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 61 147Google Scholar
[22] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[23] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[24] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[25] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15Google Scholar
[26] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[27] Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 132 154104Google Scholar
[28] Gomes L C, Carvalho A, Neto A H C 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 214103Google Scholar
[29] Ni M, Leung M K H, Leung D Y C, Sumathy K 2006 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 11 401
[30] Roldan R, Castellanos-Gomez A, Cappelluti E, Guinea F 2015 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27 313201Google Scholar
[31] Zhu C R, Wang G, Liu B L, Marie X, Qiao X F, Zhang X, Wu X X, Fan H, Tan P H, Amand T, Urbaszek B 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 121301Google Scholar
[32] Conley H J, Wang B, Ziegler J I, Haglund R F Jr, Pantelides S T, Bolotin K I 2013 Nano Lett. 13 3626Google Scholar
[33] Fei R, Li W, Li J, Yang L 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 173104Google Scholar
[34] Blonsky M N, Zhuang H L, Singh A K, Hennig R G 2015 ACS Nano 9 9885Google Scholar
[35] Sevik C, Çakır D, Gülseren O, Peeters F M 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 13948Google Scholar
[36] Michel K H, Verberck B 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 224301Google Scholar
[37] Liu S, Cohen R 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 207601Google Scholar
-
表 1 优化后的3种SiP2同素异构体及r-SiP2[16]结构晶格常数、形成能(Eb)和带隙值(Eg)
Table 1. Optimized lattice parameters, binding energy (Eb), and band gap values (Eg) of three SiP2 allotropes and r-SiP2[16] structures.
System A/Å b/Å ${ {E} }_{\text{b} }\text{/}\text{eV}$ ${ {E} }_{\text{g} }^{\text{PBE} }\text{/}\text{eV}$ ${ {E} }_{\text{g} }^{\text{HSE} }\text{/}\text{eV}$ ${ {E} }_{\text{g} }^{\text{GW} }\text{/}\text{eV}$ α-SiP2 6.13 13.89 –5.38 1.44 2.17 2.62 β-SiP2 6.09 13.73 –5.43 1.84 2.61 2.99 γ-SiP2 12.11 13.95 –5.45 1.78 2.55 3.00 r-SiP2 10.00 3.44 –5.47 1.47 2.25 2.63 表 2 3种SiP2异构体的弹性常数Cij (N/m)及压电系数eij (10–10 C/m)和dij (pm/V)
Table 2. Calculated elastic coefficients Cij (N/m) and piezoelectric coefficients eij (10–10 C/m) and dij (pm/V) of three SiP2 allotropes.
System $ {C}_{11} $ $ {C}_{22} $ $ {C}_{12} $ $ {e}_{11} $ $ {e}_{12} $ $ {d}_{11} $ $ {d}_{12} $ α-SiP2 69.69 65.74 14.79 –1.05 0.37 –1.71 0.95 β-SiP2 78.36 65.43 19.10 –0.94 –0.38 –1.13 –0.26 γ-SiP2 77.65 59.97 18.04 –0.13 –0.46 –0.01 –0.77 r-SiP2[17] 17.94 121.77 8.66 –1.93 0.17 –11.22 0.93 h-BN[9] 291 291 62 1.38 1.38 0.60 0.60 MoS2[9] 130 130 32 3.64 3.64 3.73 3.73 -
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[2] Zhang Y B, Tan Y W, Stormer H L, Kim P 2005 Nature 438 201Google Scholar
[3] Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz T F 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 136805Google Scholar
[4] Topsakal M, Aktuerk E, Ciraci S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 115442Google Scholar
[5] Cahangirov S, Topsakal M, Akturk E, Sahin H, Ciraci S 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 236804Google Scholar
[6] Li L, Yu Y, Ye G, Ge Q, Ou X, Wu H, Feng D, Chen, Xian H, Zhang Y B 2014 Nature Nanotechnology 9 372Google Scholar
[7] Liu H, Neal A T, Zhu Z, Luo Z, Xu X F, Tomanek D, Ye P D 2014 ACS Nano 8 4033Google Scholar
[8] Li T, Eugenio C, Daniele C, Carlo G, Marco F, Madan D, Alessandro M, Deji A 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 227Google Scholar
[9] Duerloo K-A N, Ong M T, Reed E J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3 2871Google Scholar
[10] Fazel S, Jae R H, Hong S K 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 22146Google Scholar
[11] Guo J, Liu Y, Ma Y, Zhu E B, Lee S, Lu Z X, Zhao Z P, Xu C H, Lee S J, Wu H, Kovnir K, Huang Y, Duan X F 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 e1705934Google Scholar
[12] Yang S X, Yang Y H, Wu M H, Hu C G, Shen W F, Gong Y J, Huang L, Jiang C H, Zhang Y Z, Ajayan P M 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1707379Google Scholar
[13] Zhou L Q, Guo Y, Zhao J J 2018 Physica E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 95 149Google Scholar
[14] Li L, Gong P L, Sheng D P, Wang S A, Wang W K, Zhu X D, Shi X Q, Wang F K, Han W, Yang S J, Liu K L, Li H Q, Zhai T Y 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 e1804541Google Scholar
[15] Wadsten T 1967 Acts Chem. Scand. 21 1374
[16] Matta S K, Zhang C, Jiao Y, O, Mullane A, Du A 2018 Nanoscale 10 6369Google Scholar
[17] Xu Y, Li Z, He C, Li J, Ouyang T, Zhang C, Tang C, Zhong J 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 023103Google Scholar
[18] Xi F, Yang H Y, Ling F, He C Z, Hou J R, Guo J Y, Li L M 2021 Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 1089Google Scholar
[19] Shi X Z, He C Y, Pickard C J, Tang C, Zhong J X 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 014104Google Scholar
[20] King-Smith R D, Vanderbilt D 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 1651Google Scholar
[21] Vanderbilt D 2000 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 61 147Google Scholar
[22] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[23] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[24] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[25] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15Google Scholar
[26] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[27] Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 132 154104Google Scholar
[28] Gomes L C, Carvalho A, Neto A H C 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 214103Google Scholar
[29] Ni M, Leung M K H, Leung D Y C, Sumathy K 2006 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 11 401
[30] Roldan R, Castellanos-Gomez A, Cappelluti E, Guinea F 2015 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27 313201Google Scholar
[31] Zhu C R, Wang G, Liu B L, Marie X, Qiao X F, Zhang X, Wu X X, Fan H, Tan P H, Amand T, Urbaszek B 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 121301Google Scholar
[32] Conley H J, Wang B, Ziegler J I, Haglund R F Jr, Pantelides S T, Bolotin K I 2013 Nano Lett. 13 3626Google Scholar
[33] Fei R, Li W, Li J, Yang L 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 173104Google Scholar
[34] Blonsky M N, Zhuang H L, Singh A K, Hennig R G 2015 ACS Nano 9 9885Google Scholar
[35] Sevik C, Çakır D, Gülseren O, Peeters F M 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 13948Google Scholar
[36] Michel K H, Verberck B 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 224301Google Scholar
[37] Liu S, Cohen R 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 207601Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 4376
- PDF下载量: 101
- 被引次数: 0