搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Na原子修饰的Bn (n = 3—10)团簇的储氢性能

荔海玲 郑小平 祁鹏堂 张娟

引用本文:
Citation:

Na原子修饰的Bn (n = 3—10)团簇的储氢性能

荔海玲, 郑小平, 祁鹏堂, 张娟
cstr: 32037.14.aps.74.20250194

Hydrogen storage properties of Na-decorated Bn(n = 3–10) clusters

LI Hailing, ZHENG Xiaoping, QI Pengtang, ZHANG Juan
cstr: 32037.14.aps.74.20250194
Article Text (iFLYTEK Translation)
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 采用密度泛函理论方法研究了Na原子修饰的Bn (n = 3—10)团簇的储氢性能. 结果表明, 两个Na原子能够与Bn团簇稳定地结合形成BnNa2 (n = 3—10)复合体. Na原子修饰的Bn团簇最多可以吸附10个氢分子, 平均吸附能处在0.063—0.095 eV/H2范围内, 最大储氢密度介于11.57%—20.45% (质量分数)之间. 分子动力学模拟表明, 温度越高, 氢分子的脱附速率越大, 脱附量也越大, 在常温条件下, BnNa2 (n = 3—8)团簇能够在短时间内(短于262 fs)实现完全脱氢, 因此, Na原子修饰的Bn团簇是一类极具潜力的储氢材料.
    Hydrogen is widely regarded as an ideal alternative energy source because of its high efficiency, abundance, pollution-free and renewable properties. One of the main challenges is to find efficient materials that can store hydrogen safely with fast kinetics, favorable thermodynamics, and high hydrogen density under ambient conditions. The nanomaterial is one of the most promising hydrogen storage materials because of its high surface-to-volume rate, unique electronic structure and novel chemical and physical properties. In this study, the hydrogen storage properties of Na-decorated Bn (n = 3–10) clusters are investigated using dispersion-corrected density functional theory and atomic density matrix propagation (ADMP) simulations. The results show that Na atoms can stably bind to Bn clusters, forming BnNa2 complexes. The average binding energies (1.876–2.967 eV) of Na atoms on the host clusters are significantly higher than the cohesive energy of bulk Na (1.113 eV), which effectively prevents Na atoms from gathering on the cluster surface. Furthermore, when Na atoms bind to Bn (n = 3–10) clusters, electrons transfer from Na to B atoms, resulting in positively charged Na atoms. Hydrogen molecules are moderately polarized under the electric field and adsorbed around Na atoms through electrostatic interactions. The H–H bonds are slightly stretched but not broken. The Na-decorated Bn clusters can adsorb up to 10 hydrogen molecules with average adsorption energies of 0.063–0.095 eV/H2 and maximum hydrogen storage densities reaching 11.57%–20.45%. Almost no structural change is observed in the host clusters after adsorbing hydrogen. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the desorption rate of hydrogen molecules increases with temperature rising. At ambient temperature (300 K), BnNa2 (n = 3–8) clusters achieve complete dehydrogenation within 262 fs, while B9Na2 and B10Na2 clusters exhibit a dehydrogenation rate of 90% within 1000 fs. The Na-decorated Bn (n = 3–10) clusters not only exhibit excellent properties for hydrogen storage but also enable efficient dehydrogenation at ambient temperature. Thus, BnNa2 (n = 3–10) clusters can be regarded as highly promising candidates for hydrogen storage.
      通信作者: 郑小平, zhengxp@lut.edu.cn ; 祁鹏堂, qipt@lzjtu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 甘肃省科技计划重点研发项目(批准号: 24YFGA027)、甘肃省自然科学基金重点项目(批准号: 22JR5RA313)和兰州市人才创新创业项目(批准号: 2018-RC-114)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: ZHENG Xiaoping, zhengxp@lut.edu.cn ; QI Pengtang, qipt@lzjtu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the Key Research and Development Programm of Science and Technology Plan of Gansu Province, China (Grant No. 24YFGA027), the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China (Grant No. 22JR5RA313), and the Talent Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project Lanzhou University, China (Grant No. 2018-RC-114).
    [1]

    Shindell D T, Lee Y, Faluvegi G 2016 Nat. Clim. Change 6 503Google Scholar

    [2]

    Ceran B, Mielcarek A, Hassan Q, Teneta J, Jaszczur M 2021 Appl. Energy 297 117161Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wróbel K, Wróbel J, Tokarz W, Lach J, Podsadni K, Czerwiński A 2022 Energies 15 8937Google Scholar

    [4]

    Okolie J A, Patra B R, Mukherjee A, Nanda S, Dalai A K, Kozinski J A 2021 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46 8885Google Scholar

    [5]

    Ousaleh H A, Mehmood S, Baba Y F, Bürger I, Linder M, Faik A 2024 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 52 1182Google Scholar

    [6]

    https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-and-fuel-cell-technologies-office [2025-2-1]

    [7]

    Liu X Y, He J, Yu J X, Li Z X, Fan Z Q 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 067303Google Scholar

    [8]

    Mohan M, Sharma V K, Kumar E A, Gayathri V 2019 Energy Storage 1 e35Google Scholar

    [9]

    Kumar A, Vyas N, Ojha A K 2020 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 12961Google Scholar

    [10]

    Tang C M, Wang Z G, Zhang X, Wen N H 2016 Chem. Phys. Lett. 661 161Google Scholar

    [11]

    Durgun E, Ciraci S, Zhou W, Yildirim T 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 226102Google Scholar

    [12]

    Duraisamy P D, S P M P, Gopalan P, Angamuthu A 2024 Struct. Chem. 35 681Google Scholar

    [13]

    Aal S A, Alfuhaidi A K 2021 Vacuum 183 109838Google Scholar

    [14]

    Ma L C, Wang L C, Sun Y R, Ma L, Zhang J M 2021 Physica E 128 114588Google Scholar

    [15]

    Banerjee P, Pathak B, Ahuja R, Das G P 2016 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 14437Google Scholar

    [16]

    Satawara A M, Shaikh G A, Gupta S K, Gajjar P N 2024 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 87 1461Google Scholar

    [17]

    Muthu R N, Rajashabala S, Kannan R 2016 Renew. Energ. 85 387Google Scholar

    [18]

    Lu Q L, Huang S G, De Li Y, Wan J G, Luo Q Q 2015 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40 13022Google Scholar

    [19]

    Tang C M, Zhang X 2016 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 16992Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kumar A, Ojha S K, Vyas N, Ojha A K 2022 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47 7861Google Scholar

    [21]

    Li H R, Zhang C, Ren W B, Wang Y J, Han T 2023 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 25821Google Scholar

    [22]

    Olalde-López D, Rodríguez-Kessler P L, Rodríguez-Carrera S, Muñoz-Castro A 2024 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 107 419

    [23]

    Si L, Tang C M 2017 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 16611Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ruan W, Wu D L, Xie A D, Yu X G 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 043104Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang Y F, Cheng X L 2019 Physica E 107 170Google Scholar

    [26]

    Becke A D 1992 J. Chem. Phys. 96 2155Google Scholar

    [27]

    Lee C, Yang W, Parr R G 1988 Phys. Rev. B 37 785Google Scholar

    [28]

    Miehlich B, Savin A, Stoll H, Preuss H 1989 Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 200Google Scholar

    [29]

    Ruan W, Wu D L, Luo W L, Yu X G, Xie A D 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 023102Google Scholar

    [30]

    Lu T, Chen F W 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580Google Scholar

    [31]

    Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, Scuseria G E, Robb M A, Cheeseman J R, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson G A, Nakatsuji H, Li X 2016 Gaussian 16 Rev. C. 01. Wallingford, CT

    [32]

    Atış M, Özdoğan C, Güvenç Z B 2007 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107 729Google Scholar

    [33]

    Ye X J, Teng Z W, Yang X L, Liu C S 2018 J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 22 84Google Scholar

    [34]

    Li Y Y, Hu Y F, Lai Q, Yuan Y Q, Huang T X, Li Q Y, Huang H B 2023 Mol. Phys. 121 e2166881Google Scholar

    [35]

    Ray S S, Sahoo S R, Sahu S 2019 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44 6019Google Scholar

  • 图 1  BnNa2 (n = 3—10)团簇的优化结构

    Fig. 1.  Optimization structures of BnNa2 (n = 3–10) cluster.

    图 2  B3Na2的总态密度与分态密度, 其中垂直虚线表示HOMO能级的位置

    Fig. 2.  TDOS and PDOS of B3Na2, the vertical dashed line indicates the HOMO level.

    图 3  BnNa2 (n = 3—10)团簇的吸氢结构

    Fig. 3.  Adsorption configurations of hydrogen molecules on BnNa2 (n = 3–10) clusters.

    图 4  氢分子的平均吸附能随吸附氢分子数量的变化

    Fig. 4.  The variation of the average adsorption energy with the number of adsorbed H2 molecules.

    图 5  在77, 200和300 K温度下B3Na2(H2)10团簇的脱附状态

    Fig. 5.  The desorption states of the B3Na2(H2)10 cluster at 77, 200 and 300 K.

    图 6  在300 K下, 第1个和最后1个氢分子脱离BnNa2(H2)10 (n = 3—10)团簇的时间

    Fig. 6.  Desorption times of the first and last H2 molecules from BnNa2(H2)10 (n = 3–10) clusters at 300 K.

    图 7  在77, 200和300 K下, BnNa2(H2)10体系的势能随时间的变化关系

    Fig. 7.  The potential energy versus time for the BnNa2(H2)10 system at 77, 200 and 300 K.

    表 1  在BnNa2(n = 3—10)团簇中, Na原子的平均结合能(Eb), HOMO-LUMO能隙(Eg), Na—B平均距离(dNa—B), Na—Na平均距离(dNa—Na), Na原子的NBO电荷(QNa)

    Table 1.  The average binding energy (Eb) of Na atoms, HOMO-LUMO energy gap (Eg), average bond lengths of natrium-boron (dNa—B), natrium-natrium (dNa—Na) and NBO charge of Na atoms (QNa) in the BnNa2 (n = 3–10) clusters.

    团簇 Eb/eV Eg/eV dNa—B dNa—Na QNa/e
    B3Na2 1.876 2.807 2.519 4.332 0.837
    B4Na2 1.756 1.901 2.355 4.043 0.868
    B5Na2 1.859 1.867 2.406 4.440 0.899
    B6Na2 2.520 2.745 2.536 5.189 0.902
    B7Na2 2.162 2.474 2.646 5.079 0.894
    B8Na2 2.967 3.320 2.424 4.849 0.979
    B9Na2 2.572 3.546 2.669 4.667 0.972
    B10Na2 2.120 2.348 2.359 6.574 0.979
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  在BnNa2(H2)10 (n = 3—10)团簇中, 氢分子的平均吸附能(Eads), 氢分子的平均键长(dH—H), 氢分子与Na原子之间的平均距离(dNa—H2), Na—B平均距离(dNa—B)以及储氢密度

    Table 2.  The average adsorption energy (Eads), average bond lengths of hydrogen-hydrogen (dH—H), natrium-hydrogen molecule (dNa—H2), natrium-boron (dNa—B) and gravimetric density of H2 of BnNa2(H2)10 (n = 3–10) cluster.

    饱和吸氢结构 Eads/eV dH—H dNa—H2 dNa—B H2/%
    B3Na2(H2)10 0.063 0.749 2.561 2.550 20.45
    B4Na2(H2)10 0.066 0.749 2.578 2.379 18.43
    B5Na2(H2)10 0.073 0.749 2.569 2.474 16.77
    B6Na2(H2)10 0.085 0.749 2.552 2.672 15.39
    B7Na2(H2)10 0.077 0.748 2.590 2.620 14.22
    B8Na2(H2)10 0.088 0.748 2.553 2.477 13.21
    B9Na2(H2)10 0.087 0.748 2.583 2.668 12.33
    B10Na2(H2)10 0.095 0.749 2.535 2.433 11.57
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  BnNa2 (n = 3—10)团簇吸附氢分子前后每个原子上的平均NBO电荷

    Table 3.  Average NBO charges on each atom before and after H2 adsorption of BnNa2 (n = 3–10) clusters.

    团簇 吸氢前 饱和吸氢后
    QB/e QNa/e QB/e QNa/e QH/e
    B3Na2 –0.558 0.837 –0.565 0.848 0.001
    B4Na2 –1.023 0.938 –0.896 0.866 0.001
    B5Na2 –0.837 0.899 –0.685 0.878 0.001
    B6Na2 –0.675 0.902 –0.483 0.889 0.005
    B7Na2 –0.258 0.894 –0.381 0.891 0.006
    B8Na2 –0.146 0.979 –0.132 0.919 0.005
    B9Na2 –0.109 0.972 –0.087 0.912 0.007
    B10Na2 –0.376 0.979 –0.317 0.912 0.005
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Shindell D T, Lee Y, Faluvegi G 2016 Nat. Clim. Change 6 503Google Scholar

    [2]

    Ceran B, Mielcarek A, Hassan Q, Teneta J, Jaszczur M 2021 Appl. Energy 297 117161Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wróbel K, Wróbel J, Tokarz W, Lach J, Podsadni K, Czerwiński A 2022 Energies 15 8937Google Scholar

    [4]

    Okolie J A, Patra B R, Mukherjee A, Nanda S, Dalai A K, Kozinski J A 2021 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46 8885Google Scholar

    [5]

    Ousaleh H A, Mehmood S, Baba Y F, Bürger I, Linder M, Faik A 2024 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 52 1182Google Scholar

    [6]

    https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-and-fuel-cell-technologies-office [2025-2-1]

    [7]

    Liu X Y, He J, Yu J X, Li Z X, Fan Z Q 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 067303Google Scholar

    [8]

    Mohan M, Sharma V K, Kumar E A, Gayathri V 2019 Energy Storage 1 e35Google Scholar

    [9]

    Kumar A, Vyas N, Ojha A K 2020 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 12961Google Scholar

    [10]

    Tang C M, Wang Z G, Zhang X, Wen N H 2016 Chem. Phys. Lett. 661 161Google Scholar

    [11]

    Durgun E, Ciraci S, Zhou W, Yildirim T 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 226102Google Scholar

    [12]

    Duraisamy P D, S P M P, Gopalan P, Angamuthu A 2024 Struct. Chem. 35 681Google Scholar

    [13]

    Aal S A, Alfuhaidi A K 2021 Vacuum 183 109838Google Scholar

    [14]

    Ma L C, Wang L C, Sun Y R, Ma L, Zhang J M 2021 Physica E 128 114588Google Scholar

    [15]

    Banerjee P, Pathak B, Ahuja R, Das G P 2016 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 14437Google Scholar

    [16]

    Satawara A M, Shaikh G A, Gupta S K, Gajjar P N 2024 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 87 1461Google Scholar

    [17]

    Muthu R N, Rajashabala S, Kannan R 2016 Renew. Energ. 85 387Google Scholar

    [18]

    Lu Q L, Huang S G, De Li Y, Wan J G, Luo Q Q 2015 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40 13022Google Scholar

    [19]

    Tang C M, Zhang X 2016 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 16992Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kumar A, Ojha S K, Vyas N, Ojha A K 2022 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47 7861Google Scholar

    [21]

    Li H R, Zhang C, Ren W B, Wang Y J, Han T 2023 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 25821Google Scholar

    [22]

    Olalde-López D, Rodríguez-Kessler P L, Rodríguez-Carrera S, Muñoz-Castro A 2024 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 107 419

    [23]

    Si L, Tang C M 2017 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 16611Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ruan W, Wu D L, Xie A D, Yu X G 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 043104Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang Y F, Cheng X L 2019 Physica E 107 170Google Scholar

    [26]

    Becke A D 1992 J. Chem. Phys. 96 2155Google Scholar

    [27]

    Lee C, Yang W, Parr R G 1988 Phys. Rev. B 37 785Google Scholar

    [28]

    Miehlich B, Savin A, Stoll H, Preuss H 1989 Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 200Google Scholar

    [29]

    Ruan W, Wu D L, Luo W L, Yu X G, Xie A D 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 023102Google Scholar

    [30]

    Lu T, Chen F W 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580Google Scholar

    [31]

    Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, Scuseria G E, Robb M A, Cheeseman J R, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson G A, Nakatsuji H, Li X 2016 Gaussian 16 Rev. C. 01. Wallingford, CT

    [32]

    Atış M, Özdoğan C, Güvenç Z B 2007 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107 729Google Scholar

    [33]

    Ye X J, Teng Z W, Yang X L, Liu C S 2018 J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 22 84Google Scholar

    [34]

    Li Y Y, Hu Y F, Lai Q, Yuan Y Q, Huang T X, Li Q Y, Huang H B 2023 Mol. Phys. 121 e2166881Google Scholar

    [35]

    Ray S S, Sahoo S R, Sahu S 2019 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44 6019Google Scholar

  • [1] 董肖. P掺杂LiNH2团簇与LiH反应机理的密度泛函理论研究及一种新储放氢机制. 物理学报, 2023, 72(15): 153101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230374
    [2] 张陈俊, 王养丽, 陈朝康. InCn+(n=110)团簇的密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(11): 113101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172662
    [3] 姜平国, 汪正兵, 闫永播, 刘文杰. W20O58(010)表面氢吸附机理的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(24): 246801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.246801
    [4] 姜平国, 汪正兵, 闫永播. 三氧化钨表面氢吸附机理的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(8): 086801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.086801
    [5] 祁鹏堂, 陈宏善. Li修饰的C24团簇的储氢性能. 物理学报, 2015, 64(23): 238102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.238102
    [6] 唐春梅, 王成杰, 高凤志, 张轶杰, 徐燕, 巩江峰. 碳硼富勒烯衍生物C18B2M(M=Li, Ti, Fe)的储氢性能计算研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(9): 096103. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.096103
    [7] 温俊青, 张建民, 姚攀, 周红, 王俊斐. PdnAl(n=18)二元团簇的密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(11): 113101. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.113101
    [8] 温俊青, 夏涛, 王俊斐. PtnAl (n=18)小团簇的密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(2): 023103. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.023103
    [9] 卢其亮, 黄守国, 李宜德. Mg原子修饰的封闭型六硼烷B6H62-储氢性质的研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(21): 213601. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.213601
    [10] 阮文, 罗文浪, 余晓光, 谢安东, 伍冬兰. 锂原子修饰B6团簇的储氢性能研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(5): 053103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.053103
    [11] 张蓓, 保安, 陈楚, 张军. ConCm(n=15; m=1,2)团簇的密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(15): 153601. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.153601
    [12] 黄海深, 王小满, 赵冬秋, 伍良福, 黄晓伟, 李蕴才. 钇覆盖Si@Al12团簇的贮氢性能. 物理学报, 2012, 61(7): 073101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.073101
    [13] 孙路石, 张安超, 向军, 郭培红, 刘志超, 苏胜. 密度泛函理论研究Hg与Auqn(n=1—6, q=0,+1,-1) 团簇的相互作用. 物理学报, 2011, 60(7): 073103. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.073103
    [14] 金蓉, 谌晓洪. 密度泛函理论对ZrnPd团簇结构和性质的研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(10): 6955-6962. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6955
    [15] 孙建敏, 赵高峰, 王献伟, 杨雯, 刘岩, 王渊旭. Cu吸附(SiO3)n(n=1—8)团簇几何结构和电子性质的密度泛函研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(11): 7830-7837. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.7830
    [16] 杨培芳, 胡娟梅, 滕波涛, 吴锋民, 蒋仕宇. Rh在单壁碳纳米管上吸附的密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(5): 3331-3337. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3331
    [17] 许桂贵, 吴青云, 张健敏, 陈志高, 黄志高. 第一性原理研究氧在Ni(111)表面上的吸附能及功函数. 物理学报, 2009, 58(3): 1924-1930. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1924
    [18] 陈玉红, 康 龙, 张材荣, 罗永春, 马 军. [Mg(NH2)2]n(n=1—5)团簇的密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(8): 4866-4874. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4866
    [19] 陈玉红, 张材荣, 马 军. MgmBn(m=1,2;n=1—4)团簇结构与性质的密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(1): 171-178. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.171
    [20] 曾振华, 邓辉球, 李微雪, 胡望宇. O在Au(111)表面吸附的密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(6): 3157-3164. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3157
计量
  • 文章访问数:  305
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-02-17
  • 修回日期:  2025-05-18
  • 上网日期:  2025-05-29
  • 刊出日期:  2025-07-20

/

返回文章
返回