NO<sub>2</sub> sensing properties of porous Fe-doped indium oxide

Liu Zhi-Fu; Li Pei; Cheng Tie-Dong; Huang Wen

doi:10.7498/aps.69.20200956

Abstract

It is of great significance to study the characteristics and working mechanism of NO₂ sensor material for monitoring air pollution and protecting human health. As a metal oxide semiconductor material with simple preparation, low cost and good long-term stability, In₂O₃ has been widely studied in the detection of NO₂. In order to explore the influence of Fe content on the gas sensing properties of porous In₂O₃ material, porous Fe-doped In₂O₃ nanoparticles are synthesized by the hydrothermal method, and the NO₂ sensor is fabricated by using the above nanoparticles. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy and specific surface area measurement are used to characterize the micro morphology of the prepared nanoparticles in this paper, while the sensor performance is studied, including temperature, response recovery, selectivity and stability. In most samples, Fe atoms are completely doped into the In₂O₃ lattice as indicated by the XRD results. The SEM results show that the Fe-doped In₂O₃ nanoparticles prepared with Span-40 as activators are square in size of 50–200 nm, and a large number of small pores are distributed in it, which are also observed in the N₂ adsorption/desorption experiment, this is one of the main reasons for the large specific surface area and high sensitivity of the nano materials. Studying the performance of the sensor, we find that when the molar ratio of In∶Fe is 9∶1, the sensor made of porous Fe-doped In₂O₃ nanoparticles has an excellent selectivity and short response recovery time for NO₂ gas. The sensitivity of the sensor to 50-ppm-concentration (1 ppm = 1 mg/L) NO₂ can reach 960.5 at 260 ℃, and the response time and recovery time are 5 s and 6 s respectively. Based on the theory of space charge and the knowledge of built-in barrier and energy band change before and after doping, the mechanism of the sensor is analyzed.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
2.
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610054, China

Corresponding author: Cheng Tie-Dong, chengtiedong@126.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61971108, 61804023) and the Science and Technology Research Program of the Education Department of Jiangxi Province, China (Grant No. GJJ180485)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Xu X M, Zhang H J, Diao Q, Zhu Y S, Yang G 2019 Mater. Res. Express 6 17 Google Scholar
[2]	Bo Z, Guo X Z, Wei X, Yang H C, Yan J H, Cen K F 2019 Physica E 109 156 Google Scholar
[3]	Borgohain R, Das R, Mondal B, Yordsri V, Thanachayanont C, Baruah S 2018 IEEE Sens. J. 18 7203 Google Scholar
[4]	赵博硕, 强晓永, 秦岳, 胡明 2018 物理学报 67 058101 Google Scholar Zhao B S, Qiang X Y, Qin Y, Hu M 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 058101 Google Scholar
[5]	Zhou P F, Shen Y B, Lu W, Zhao S K, Li T T, Zhong X X, Cui B Y, Wei D Z, Zhang Y H 2020 J. Alloys Compd. 828 154395 Google Scholar
[6]	Hung N M, Hieu N M, Chinh N D, Hien T T, Quang N D, Majumder S, Choi G, Kim C, Kim D 2020 Sens. Actuators, B 313 128001 Google Scholar
[7]	Chen K X, Lu H, Li G, Zhang J N, Tian Y H, Gao Y, Guo Q M, Lu H B, Gao J Z 2020 Sens. Actuator, B 308 127716 Google Scholar
[8]	Nam B, Ko T K, Hyun S K, Lee C 2019 Nano Converg. 6 40 Google Scholar
[9]	Shen Y B, Zhong X X, Zhang J, Li T T, Zhao S K, Cui B Y, Wei D Z, Zhang Y H, Wei K F 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 498 143873 Google Scholar
[10]	Pawar K K, Shaikh J S, Mali S S, Navale Y H, Patil V B, Hong C K, Patil P S 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 806 726 Google Scholar
[11]	Yang W, Chen H T, Li C L, Meng H 2020 Mater. Lett. 271 127782 Google Scholar
[12]	Park B G, Reddeppa M, Kim Y H, Kim S G, Kim M D 2020 Nanotechnology 31 335503 Google Scholar
[13]	Zhao S K, Shen Y B, Zhou P F, Hao F L, Xu X Y, Gao S L, Wei D Z, Ao Y X, Shen Y S 2020 Sens. Actuator, B 308 127729 Google Scholar
[14]	Bi H S, Shen Y B, Zhao S K, Zhou P F, Gao S L, Cui B Y, Wei D Z, Zhang Y H, Wei K F 2020 Vacuum 172 109086 Google Scholar
[15]	Cheng M, Wu Z P, Liu G N, Zhao L J, Gao Y, Li S, Zhang B, Yan X, Lu G Y 2020 Sens. Actuator, B 304 127272 Google Scholar
[16]	Ri J S, Li X W, Shao C L, Liu Y, Han C H, Li X H, Liu Y C 2020 Sens. Actuator, B 317 128194 Google Scholar
[17]	Sabry R S, Agool I R, Abbas A M 2019 Silicon 11 2475 Google Scholar
[18]	Lee O H, Tseng W J 2019 J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Electron. 30 15145 Google Scholar
[19]	Inyawilert K, Channei D, Tamaekong N, Liewhiran C, Wisitsoraat A, Tuantranont A, Phanichphant S 2016 J. Nanopart. Res. 18 40 Google Scholar
[20]	Yoo Y K, Xue Q Z, Lee H C, Cheng S F, Xiang X D, Dionne G F, Xu S F, He J, Chu Y S, Preite S D, Lofland S E, Takeuchi I 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 042506 Google Scholar
[21]	Sreethawong T, Chavadej S, Ngamsinlapasathian S, Yoshikawa S 2008 Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 109 84 Google Scholar
[22]	Cao M H, Wang Y D, Chen T, Antonietti M, Niederberger M 2008 Chem. Mater. 20 5781 Google Scholar
[23]	Jia X, Fan H 2010 Mater. Res. Bull. 45 1496 Google Scholar
[24]	Wetchakun K, Samerjai T, Tamaekong N, Liewhiran C, Siriwong V, Kruefu V, Wisitsoraat A, Tuantranont A, Phanichphant S 2011 Sens. Actuator, B 160 580 Google Scholar
[25]	Bai S L, Zhang K W, Luo R X, Li D Q, Chen A F, Liu C C 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 12643 Google Scholar
[26]	Xiao B X, Zhao Q, Wang D X, Ma G S, Zhang M Z 2017 New J. Chem. 41 8530 Google Scholar
[27]	Zhao J, Yang T L, Liu Y P, Wang Z Y, Li X W, Sun Y F, Du Y, Li Y C, Lu G Y 2014 Sens. Actuator, B 191 806 Google Scholar
[28]	Han D M, Zhai L L, Gu F B, Wang Z H 2018 Sens. Actuator, B 262 655 Google Scholar
[29]	Hu J, Liang Y F, Sun Y J, Zhao Z T, Zhang M, Li P W, Zhang W D, Chen Y, Zhuiykov S 2017 Sens. Actuator, B 252 116 Google Scholar
[30]	Fahed C, Qadri S B, Kim H, Piqué A, Miller M, Mahadik N A, Rao M V, Osofsky M 2010 Phys. Status Solidi C 7 2298 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 传感器灵敏度测量示意图　(a) 传感器结构图; (b) 传感测试系统

Figure 1. Diagram used to measure the sensitivity of sensor: (a) Structure of sensor; (b) sensor test system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 Fe掺杂In₂O₃的XRD图谱

Figure 2. XRD patterns of Fe-doped In₂O₃.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 SEM图像　(a) 样品1; (b) 样品2; (c) 样品3; (d) 样品4; (e) 样品5; (f) 样品6

Figure 3. SEM images: (a) S1; (b) S2; (c) S3; (d) S4; (e) S5; (f) S6.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 (a) 样品4的TEM图像; (b) 样品4的EDS光谱和SAED图案

Figure 4. (a) TEM image of S4; (b) EDS spectroscopy and SAED pattern taken from S4.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 (a) 样品1的N₂吸附/脱附曲线; (b) 样品1的孔径分布; (c) 样品4的N₂吸附/脱附曲线; (d) 样品4的孔径分布

Figure 5. N₂ adsorption/desorption curves of (a) S1 and (c) S4; the pore size distribution of (b) S1 and (d) S4.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 掺杂In₂O₃结构形成机理图

Figure 6. Schematic illustrating the formation mechanism of the doped In₂O₃ structures.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 (a) 6种传感器在温度为260 ℃时放置在浓度为5−100 ppm的NO₂下的气体响应; (b) 样品1−样品6的比表面积

Figure 7. (a) Gas response of the 6 sensors exposed to NO₂ at concentrations ranging from 5 ppm to 100 ppm at 260 °C; (b) surface area of S1−S6.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 样品4气体响应随温度的变化　(a) 不同工作温度下的典型响应和恢复曲线; (b) 不同温度下对50 ppm NO₂的气体响应

Figure 8. Gas response of S4 as a function of temperature: (a) Typical response and recovery curves at different working temperatures; (b) gas response to 50 ppm NO₂ at different working temperatures.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 基于样品4制作的传感器在260 ℃时对NO₂气体的响应-恢复曲线　(a)气体浓度范围为5−100 ppm; (b) 气体浓度为50 ppm

Figure 9. Gas response-recovery of the sensor based on S4 exposed to NO₂ at 260 °C: (a) Gas concentrations ranging from 5 ppm to 100 ppm; (b) gas concentration is 50 ppm.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 在260 ℃时样品4对浓度为50 ppm不同试验气体的灵敏度

Figure 10. Selectivity of S4 to different test gases with a concentration of 50 ppm at 260 °C.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 11 在260 ℃时Fe掺杂In₂O₃传感器(S4)对浓度为50 ppm的NO₂的稳定性测试(插图为S4在(a)第1天和(b) 第90天的气体响应)

Figure 11. Stability of the Fe-doped In₂O₃ structures (S4) sensor to NO₂ with a concentration of 50 ppm at 260 °C (inset: gas response of S4 for (a) the first day and (b) the 90th day).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 12 (a) 反应示意图; (b) 传感机理图; (c) 能带图

Figure 12. (a) Schematic diagram; (b) gas sensing mechanism; (c) the band diagram.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 样品原材料组成表

Table 1. Composition of sample raw materials.

样品编号	组成及用量/g			In/Fe摩尔比
样品编号	In(NO₃)₃·4.5H₂O	Fe(NO₃)₃·9H₂O	Span-40	In/Fe摩尔比
样品1 (S1)	0.5729	0	0.6030	—
样品2 (S2)	0.5729	0.1212	0.6030	5∶1
样品3 (S3)	0.5729	0.0866	0.6030	7∶1
样品4 (S4)	0.5729	0.0673	0.6030	9∶1
样品5 (S5)	0.5729	0.0505	0.6030	12∶1
样品6 (S6)	0.5729	0.0404	0.6030	15∶1

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Xu X M, Zhang H J, Diao Q, Zhu Y S, Yang G 2019 Mater. Res. Express 6 17 Google Scholar
[2]	Bo Z, Guo X Z, Wei X, Yang H C, Yan J H, Cen K F 2019 Physica E 109 156 Google Scholar
[3]	Borgohain R, Das R, Mondal B, Yordsri V, Thanachayanont C, Baruah S 2018 IEEE Sens. J. 18 7203 Google Scholar
[4]	赵博硕, 强晓永, 秦岳, 胡明 2018 物理学报 67 058101 Google Scholar Zhao B S, Qiang X Y, Qin Y, Hu M 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 058101 Google Scholar
[5]	Zhou P F, Shen Y B, Lu W, Zhao S K, Li T T, Zhong X X, Cui B Y, Wei D Z, Zhang Y H 2020 J. Alloys Compd. 828 154395 Google Scholar
[6]	Hung N M, Hieu N M, Chinh N D, Hien T T, Quang N D, Majumder S, Choi G, Kim C, Kim D 2020 Sens. Actuators, B 313 128001 Google Scholar
[7]	Chen K X, Lu H, Li G, Zhang J N, Tian Y H, Gao Y, Guo Q M, Lu H B, Gao J Z 2020 Sens. Actuator, B 308 127716 Google Scholar
[8]	Nam B, Ko T K, Hyun S K, Lee C 2019 Nano Converg. 6 40 Google Scholar
[9]	Shen Y B, Zhong X X, Zhang J, Li T T, Zhao S K, Cui B Y, Wei D Z, Zhang Y H, Wei K F 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 498 143873 Google Scholar
[10]	Pawar K K, Shaikh J S, Mali S S, Navale Y H, Patil V B, Hong C K, Patil P S 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 806 726 Google Scholar
[11]	Yang W, Chen H T, Li C L, Meng H 2020 Mater. Lett. 271 127782 Google Scholar
[12]	Park B G, Reddeppa M, Kim Y H, Kim S G, Kim M D 2020 Nanotechnology 31 335503 Google Scholar
[13]	Zhao S K, Shen Y B, Zhou P F, Hao F L, Xu X Y, Gao S L, Wei D Z, Ao Y X, Shen Y S 2020 Sens. Actuator, B 308 127729 Google Scholar
[14]	Bi H S, Shen Y B, Zhao S K, Zhou P F, Gao S L, Cui B Y, Wei D Z, Zhang Y H, Wei K F 2020 Vacuum 172 109086 Google Scholar
[15]	Cheng M, Wu Z P, Liu G N, Zhao L J, Gao Y, Li S, Zhang B, Yan X, Lu G Y 2020 Sens. Actuator, B 304 127272 Google Scholar
[16]	Ri J S, Li X W, Shao C L, Liu Y, Han C H, Li X H, Liu Y C 2020 Sens. Actuator, B 317 128194 Google Scholar
[17]	Sabry R S, Agool I R, Abbas A M 2019 Silicon 11 2475 Google Scholar
[18]	Lee O H, Tseng W J 2019 J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Electron. 30 15145 Google Scholar
[19]	Inyawilert K, Channei D, Tamaekong N, Liewhiran C, Wisitsoraat A, Tuantranont A, Phanichphant S 2016 J. Nanopart. Res. 18 40 Google Scholar
[20]	Yoo Y K, Xue Q Z, Lee H C, Cheng S F, Xiang X D, Dionne G F, Xu S F, He J, Chu Y S, Preite S D, Lofland S E, Takeuchi I 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 042506 Google Scholar
[21]	Sreethawong T, Chavadej S, Ngamsinlapasathian S, Yoshikawa S 2008 Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 109 84 Google Scholar
[22]	Cao M H, Wang Y D, Chen T, Antonietti M, Niederberger M 2008 Chem. Mater. 20 5781 Google Scholar
[23]	Jia X, Fan H 2010 Mater. Res. Bull. 45 1496 Google Scholar
[24]	Wetchakun K, Samerjai T, Tamaekong N, Liewhiran C, Siriwong V, Kruefu V, Wisitsoraat A, Tuantranont A, Phanichphant S 2011 Sens. Actuator, B 160 580 Google Scholar
[25]	Bai S L, Zhang K W, Luo R X, Li D Q, Chen A F, Liu C C 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 12643 Google Scholar
[26]	Xiao B X, Zhao Q, Wang D X, Ma G S, Zhang M Z 2017 New J. Chem. 41 8530 Google Scholar
[27]	Zhao J, Yang T L, Liu Y P, Wang Z Y, Li X W, Sun Y F, Du Y, Li Y C, Lu G Y 2014 Sens. Actuator, B 191 806 Google Scholar
[28]	Han D M, Zhai L L, Gu F B, Wang Z H 2018 Sens. Actuator, B 262 655 Google Scholar
[29]	Hu J, Liang Y F, Sun Y J, Zhao Z T, Zhang M, Li P W, Zhang W D, Chen Y, Zhuiykov S 2017 Sens. Actuator, B 252 116 Google Scholar
[30]	Fahed C, Qadri S B, Kim H, Piqué A, Miller M, Mahadik N A, Rao M V, Osofsky M 2010 Phys. Status Solidi C 7 2298 Google Scholar

[1]	Zhu Hong-Qiang, Luo Lei, Wu Ze-Bang, Yin Kai-Hui, Yue Yuan-Xia, Yang Ying, Feng Qing, Jia Wei-Yao. Theoretical calculation study on enhancing the sensitivity and optical properties of graphene adsorption of nitrogen dioxide via doping. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(20): 203101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240992
[2]	Chen Jin-Long, Tao Ran, Li Chong, Zhang Jian-Lei, Fu Chen, Luo Jing-Ting. SnS₂/In₂O₃ based gas sensors and its high performance of detecting NO₂ at room temperature. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(10): 106801. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231554
[3]	Zhang Yu-Qi, Wang Jun-Jie, Lü Zi-Yu, Han Su-Ting. Multimode modulated memristors for in-sensor computing system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(14): 148502. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220226
[4]	Zhang Jia-Wei, Yao Hong-Bo, Zhang Yuan-Zheng, Jiang Wei-Bo, Wu Yong-Hui, Zhang Ya-Ju, Ao Tian-Yong, Zheng Hai-Wu. Self-powered sensing based on triboelectric nanogenerator through machine learning and its application. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 078702. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211632
[5]	Wang Kun, Duan Gao-Yan, Lang Pei-Lin, Zhao Yu-Fang, Liu Jian-Bin, Song Gang. Biosensor based on plasmonic Mach-Zehnder interferometer with metallic gratings. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(1): 017301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211420
[6]	Ding Zi-Ping, Liao Jian-Fei, Zeng Ze-Kai. A new type of ultra-broadband microstructured fiber sensor based on surface plasmon resonance. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(7): 074207. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201477
[7]	Pang Hui-Zhong, Wang Xin, Wang Jun-Lin, Wang Zong-Li, Liu Su-Yalatu, Tian Hu-Qiang. Sensing characteristics of dual band terahertz metamaterial absorber sensor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(16): 168101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210062
[8]	Bian Xiao-Ge, Zhou Sheng, Zhang Lei, He Tian-Bo, Li Jin-Song. NO₂ gas detection based on standard sample regression algorithm and cavity enhanced spectroscopy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(5): 050702. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201322
[9]	Wu Jingen, Gao Xiangyu, Chen Jianguo, Wang Chun-Ming, Zhang Shujun, Dong Shuxiang. Review of high temperature piezoelectric materials, devices, and applications. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(20): 207701. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181091
[10]	Wu Pei, Hu Xiao, Zhang Jian, Sun Lian-Feng. Research status and development graphene devices using silicon as the subtrate. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(21): 218102. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.218102
[11]	Wang Jia-Lu, Du Mu-Qing, Zhang Ling-Li, Liu Yong-Jun, Sun Wei-Min. Transmission characteristics of photonic crystal fibers based on filling different kinds of liquid crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(12): 120702. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.120702
[12]	Sun Jie, Yang Jian-Feng, Yan Su, Yang Jing-Jing, Huang Ming. Transmission characteristics and potential applications of plasmon-assisted parallel-plated waveguide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(7): 078402. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.078402
[13]	Liu Jin, Si Fu-Qi, Zhou Hai-Jin, Zhao Ming-Jie, Dou Ke, Wang Yu, Liu Wen-Qing. Observation of two-dimensional distributions of NO2 with airborne Imaging DOAS technology. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(3): 034217. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.034217
[14]	Luo Xue-Xue, Chen Jia-Bi, Hu Jin-Bing, Liang Bin-Ming, Jiang Qiang. Analysis and experimental investigation of the temperature property of sensors based on symmetrical metal-cladding optical waveguide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(23): 234208. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.234208
[15]	Liao Wen-Ying, Fan Wan-De, Li Hai-Peng, Sui Jia-Nan, Cao Xue-Wei. Quasi-crystal photonic fiber surface plasmon resonance sensor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(6): 064213. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.064213
[16]	Chen Bing-Zhang, Yi Hang, Yang Jin-Ge, Chi Zi-Hui, Rong Jian, Hu Bing, Jiang Hua-Bei. The human colorectal cancer tissue in vitro experimental study based on photoacoustic endoscopic system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(8): 084204. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.084204
[17]	Zhu Li, Liu Shang-He, Zheng Hui-Zhi, Wei Ming, Hu Xiao-Feng, Sorokin Andrey. Modeling and experimental study of the mechanism of electrification from aero-engine jet. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(22): 225201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.225201
[18]	Wang Ting, Wang Pu-Cai, Yu Huan, Zhang Xing-Ying, Zhou Bin, Si Fu-Qi, Wang Shan-Shan, Bai Wen-Guang, Zhou Hai-Jin, Zhao Heng. Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 by ground-based MAX-DOAS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(5): 054206. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.054206
[19]	Huang Qin, Leng Feng-Chun, Liang Wen-Yao, Dong Jian-Wen, Wang He-Zhou. Sensitive temperature sensor based on phase properties of photonic crystal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(6): 4014-4017. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4014
[20]	Zhang Gui-Yin, Jin Yi-Dong. Optical-optical double-color and double-resonance multiphoton ionization spectrum of NO2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(1): 132-136. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.132

Catalog

Vol. 69, Issue 24 - 2020-12-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 7481
PDF Downloads: 86
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板

NO₂ sensing properties of porous Fe-doped indium oxide

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Cheng Tie-Dong, chengtiedong@126.com

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

Search

Article

留言板

NO2 sensing properties of porous Fe-doped indium oxide

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Cheng Tie-Dong, chengtiedong@126.com

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Publishing process

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

NO₂ sensing properties of porous Fe-doped indium oxide