Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Experimental progress of quantum machine learning based on spin systems

Tian Yu Lin Zi-Dong Wang Xiang-Yu Che Liang-Yu Lu Da-Wei

Citation:

Experimental progress of quantum machine learning based on spin systems

Tian Yu, Lin Zi-Dong, Wang Xiang-Yu, Che Liang-Yu, Lu Da-Wei
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Machine learning is widely applied in various areas due to its advantages in pattern recognition, but it is severely restricted by the computing power of classic computers. In recent years, with the rapid development of quantum technology, quantum machine learning has been verified experimentally verified in many quantum systems, and exhibited great advantages over classical algorithms for certain specific problems. In the present review, we mainly introduce two typical spin systems, nuclear magnetic resonance and nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, and review some representative experiments in the field of quantum machine learning, which were carried out in recent years.
      Corresponding author: Lu Da-Wei, ludw@sustc.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0308100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12075110, 11975117, 11905099, 11875159, U1801661), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China (Grant No. 2019A1515011383), the Guangdong International Collaboration Program, China (Grant No. 2020A0505100001), the Science, Technology, and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, China (Grant Nos. ZDSYS20170303165926217, KQTD20190929173815000, JCYJ20200109140803865, JCYJ20170412152620376, JCYJ20180302174036418), the Pengcheng Scholars, the Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program, China (Grant No. 2019ZT08C044), and the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory, China (Grant No. 2019B121203002)
    [1]

    Mitchell T M 1997 Machine Learning (Boston, MA, USA: McGraw-Hill)

    [2]

    Carleo G, Cirac I, Cranmer K, Daudet L, Schuld M, Tishby N, Vogt-Maranto L, Zdeborová L 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 045002Google Scholar

    [3]

    Athey S 2018 The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics, in The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) pp507−547

    [4]

    Liakos K G, Busato P, Moshou D, Pearson S, Bochtis D 2018 Sensors 18 2674Google Scholar

    [5]

    Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E 2012 Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 pp1097−1105.

    [6]

    Simonyan K, Zisserman A 2014 arXiv: 1409.1556 [cs.CV]

    [7]

    He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) pp770-778

    [8]

    Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger K Q 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) pp4700−4708

    [9]

    Brown T B, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, Shyam P, Sastry G, Askell A, Agarwal S 2020 arXiv: 2005.14165 [cs.CL]

    [10]

    Rønnow T F, Wang Z, Job J, Boixo S, Isakov S V, Wecker D, Martinis J M, Lidar D A, Troyer M 2014 Science 345 420Google Scholar

    [11]

    Feynman R P 1982 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467Google Scholar

    [12]

    Arute F, Arya K, Babbush R, et al. 2019 Nature 574 505Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhong H S, Wang H, Deng Y H, et al. 2020 Science 370 1460Google Scholar

    [14]

    Biamonte J, Wittek P, Pancotti N, Rebentrost P, Wiebe N, Lloyd S 2017 Nature 549 195Google Scholar

    [15]

    Deutsch D 1985 A. Math. Phys. Sci. 400 97Google Scholar

    [16]

    Shor P W 1994 Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Santa Fe, NM, USA, Nov. 20–22, 1994 pp124−134

    [17]

    Grover L K 1996 Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing Philadelphia PA, USA, 1996 pp212−219

    [18]

    Grover L K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 325Google Scholar

    [19]

    Harrow A W, Hassidim A, Lloyd S 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 150502Google Scholar

    [20]

    Vandersypen L M K, Chuang I L 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 1037Google Scholar

    [21]

    Rabi I I, Zacharias J R, Millman S, Kusch P 1938 Phys. Rev. 53 318Google Scholar

    [22]

    Bloch F 1946 Phys. Rev. 70 460Google Scholar

    [23]

    Stewart W E, Siddall T H 1970 Chem. Rev. 70 517Google Scholar

    [24]

    Hore P J 2015 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (United States: Oxford University Press)

    [25]

    Harris R K 1986 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (United States: OSTI)

    [26]

    Freeman R 1987 Handbook of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (United States: OSTI)

    [27]

    Gershenfeld N A, Chuang I L 1997 Science 275 350Google Scholar

    [28]

    Cory D G, Fahmy A F, Havel T F 1997 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94 1634Google Scholar

    [29]

    Nielsen M A, Chuang I 2001 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary Edition) (United States: Cambridge University Press)

    [30]

    Barz S, Kassal I, Ringbauer M, Lipp Y O, Dakić B, Aspuru-Guzik A, Walther P 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 6115Google Scholar

    [31]

    Pan J, Cao Y, Yao X, Li Z, Ju C, Chen H, Peng X, Kais S, Du J 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 022313Google Scholar

    [32]

    Cai X D, Weedbrook C, Su Z E, Chen M C, Gu M, Zhu M J, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 230501Google Scholar

    [33]

    Subaşı Y, Somma R D, Orsucci D 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 60504Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wen J, Kong X, Wei S, Wang B, Xin T, Long G 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 012320Google Scholar

    [35]

    Leyton S K, Osborne T J 2008 arXiv: 0812.4423 [quant-ph]

    [36]

    Berry D W 2014 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 105301Google Scholar

    [37]

    Berry D W, Childs A M, Ostrander A, Wang G 2017 Commun. Math. Phys. 356 1057Google Scholar

    [38]

    Xin T, Wei S, Cui J, Xiao J, Arrazola I, Lamata L, Kong X, Lu D, Solano E, Long G 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 032307Google Scholar

    [39]

    Shao C, Li Y, Li H 2019 J. Syst. Sci. Complex. 32 375Google Scholar

    [40]

    Platt J C 1998 Technical Report MSR-TR-98-14, Redmond, WA, USA

    [41]

    Rebentrost P, Mohseni M, Lloyd S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 130503Google Scholar

    [42]

    Li Z, Liu X, Xu N, Du J 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 140504Google Scholar

    [43]

    Jolliffe I T 1986 Principal Component Analysis (Berlin: Springer)

    [44]

    Lloyd S, Mohseni M, Rebentrost P 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 631Google Scholar

    [45]

    Xin T, Che L, Xi C, Singh A, Nie X, Li J, Dong Y, Lu D 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 110502Google Scholar

    [46]

    Loubser J H N, Wyk J A 1978 Rep. Prog. Phys. 41 1201Google Scholar

    [47]

    Barry J F, Schloss J M, Bauch E, Turner M J, Hart C A, Pham L M, Walsworth R L 2020 Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 015004Google Scholar

    [48]

    Shi F, Zhang Q, Wang P, Sun H, Wang J, Rong X, Chen M, Ju C, Reinhard F, Chen H, Wrachtrup J, Wang J, Du J 2015 Science 347 1135Google Scholar

    [49]

    Pompili M, Hermans S L N, Baier S, Beukers H K C, Humphreys P C, Schouten R N, Vermeulen R F L, Tiggelman M J, Martins L S, Dirkse B, Wehner S, Hanson R 2021 Science 372 259Google Scholar

    [50]

    Doherty M W, Manson N B, Delaney P, Hollenberg L C L 2011 New J. Phys. 13 025019Google Scholar

    [51]

    Smeltzer B, McIntyre J, Childress L 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 050302(RGoogle Scholar

    [52]

    Manson N B, Harrison J P, Sellars M J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 104303Google Scholar

    [53]

    Batalov A, Zierl C, Gaebel T, Neumann P, Chan I Y, Balasubramanian G, Hemmer P R, Jelezko F, Wrachtrup J 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 077401Google Scholar

    [54]

    Lian W, Wang S T, Lu S, Huang Y, Wang F, Yuan X, Zhang W, Ouyang X, Wang X, Huang X, He L, Chang X, Deng D L, Duan L 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 210503Google Scholar

    [55]

    Gu J, Wang Z, Kuen J, Ma L, Shahroudy A, Shuai B, Liu T, Wang X, Wang G, Cai J, Chen T 2018 Pattern Recognit. 77 354Google Scholar

    [56]

    Kiranyaz S, Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Ince T, Gabbouj M, Inman D J 2021 Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 151 107398Google Scholar

    [57]

    Li Z, Chai Z, Guo Y, Ji W, Wang M, Shi F, Wang Y, Lloyd S, Du J 2021 arXiv: 2104.02476 [quant-ph]

    [58]

    Zhou F, Tian Y, Song Y, Qiu C, Wang X, Chen B, Xu N, Lu D 2021 Preserving Entanglement in a Solid-Spin System Using Quantum Autoencoders Prepr.

    [59]

    Havlíček V, Córcoles A D, Temme K, Harrow A W, Kandala A, Chow J M, Gambetta J M 2019 Nature 567 209Google Scholar

    [60]

    Arrazola J M, Bromley T R, Izaac J, Myers C R, Brádler K, Killoran N 2019 Quantum Sci. Technol. 4 24004Google Scholar

    [61]

    Xiao L, Zhan X, Bian Z H, Wang K K, Zhang X, Wang X P, Li J, Mochizuki K, Kim D, Kawakami N, Yi W, Obuse H, Sanders B C, Xue P 2017 Nature Physics 13 1117Google Scholar

    [62]

    Che Y, Gneiting C, Liu T, Nori F 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 134213Google Scholar

    [63]

    Holanda N L, Griffith M A R 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 054107Google Scholar

    [64]

    Zhang Y, Ginsparg P, Kim E 2020 Phys. Rev. Research 2 023283Google Scholar

    [65]

    Ming Y, Lin C, Bartlett S D, Zhang W 2019 npj Computational Materials 5 88Google Scholar

    [66]

    Zhang P, Shen H, Zhai H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 066401Google Scholar

  • 图 1  实现HHL算法的量子线路图. 其中$ r=2, {t}_{0}=2 $. 单比特门$ {{S}}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 0\\ 0& \mathrm{i}\end{array}\right),\; {{H}}=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 1\\ 1& -1\end{array}\right),\; {{{R}}}_{y}\left(\theta \right)= $$ \left(\begin{array}{cc}\cos\tfrac{\theta }{2}& -\sin\tfrac{\theta }{2}\\ \sin\frac{\theta }{2}& \cos\frac{\theta }{2}\end{array}\right) $. 与直线相连的$ \times $表示SWAP门[31]

    Figure 1.  The quantum circuit of the HHL algorithm. Parameter $ r=2, ~~{t}_{0}=2 $. Quantum gate $ {{S}}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 0\\ 0& \mathrm{i}\end{array}\right), \; {{H}}= $$ \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 1\\ 1& -1\end{array}\right), \;{{{R}}}_{y}\left(\theta \right)=\left(\begin{array}{cc}\cos\frac{\theta }{2}& -\sin\tfrac{\theta }{2}\\ \sin\frac{\theta }{2}& \cos\tfrac{\theta }{2}\end{array}\right) $. The symbol $ \times $ connected with the straight line represents the SWAP gate[31].

    图 2  解线性微分方程的量子线路图. 线路中第一个辅助寄存器是单比特, 第二个辅助寄存器为$ T=\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}{\mathrm{g}}_{2}\left(k+1\right) $比特, 然后是一个工作系统. 所有的辅助寄存器被初始化为$ \left|0\right\rangle {\left|0\right\rangle }^{\mathrm{T}} $, 控制操作$ {U}_{x} $$ {U}_{b} $分别被用来生成$ \left|{{x}}\left(0\right)\right\rangle $$ \left|{{b}}\right\rangle $. 在编码和解码期间的演化算子为$\displaystyle \sum\nolimits_{\tau =0}^{k}\left|\tau \right\rangle \left\langle\tau \right|\otimes {U}_{\tau }$. 在线路的结尾, 在所有辅助比特为$ \left| 0 \right\rangle $的子空间中测量工作系统的态矢[38]

    Figure 2.  Quantum circuit for solving linear differential equations. The first auxiliary register in the circuit is a single bit, and the second auxiliary register is $ T=\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}{\mathrm{g}}_{2}\left(k+1\right) $ bits, then is a working system $ \left|\phi \right\rangle $. All auxiliary registers are initialized to $ \left|0\right\rangle {\left|0\right\rangle }^{\mathrm{T}} $, and then the operation $ {U}_{x} $ and $ {U}_{b} $ are used to generate $ \left|{{x}}\left(0\right)\right\rangle $ and $ \left|{{b}}\right\rangle $. The evolution operator during encoding and decoding is $\displaystyle \sum\nolimits_{\tau =0}^{k}\left|\tau \right\rangle \left\langle\tau \right|\otimes {U}_{\tau }$. At the end of the circuit, the state vector of the working system is measured in the subspace where all auxiliary bits are $ \left| 0 \right\rangle $[38].

    图 3  手写字符“6”和“9”的识别结果, 第1—4行分别代表手写字符, 实验指示符, 相干项的幅度和识别结果[42]

    Figure 3.  Recognition results of handwritten characters of “6” and “9”. Lines 1 to 4 represent handwritten characters, experimental indicators, amplitude, and recognition results, respectively[42].

    图 4  通过qPCA实现人脸识别的流程图. 通过混合经典量子控制方法对PQC $ {\cal{U}}\left({{\theta }}\right) $进行迭代优化, 其中在量子处理器上测量目标函数$ L\left({{\theta }}\right) $和梯度$ g\left({{\theta }}\right) $. 参数$ {{\theta }} $的存储和更新在经典计算机上实现. 用优化后的$ {U}_{g} $来计算特征脸矩阵D和协方差矩阵C的特征向量[45]

    Figure 4.  Workflow for human face recognition via qPCA. The PQC $ {\cal{U}}\left({{\theta }}\right) $ is iteratively optimized via the hybrid classicalquantum control approach, where the objective function $ L\left({{\theta }}\right) $ and the gradient $ g\left({{\theta }}\right) $ are measured on the quantum processor. The storage and update of the parameters $ {{\theta }} $ are implemented on a classical computer. The optimized PQC with the operator $ {U}_{g} $ is applied to compute the eigenvectors of the eigenface matrix $ {{D}} $ and the covariance matrix $ {{C}}={{A}}{{{A}}}^{\mathrm{T}} $[45].

    图 5  (a)金刚石NV色心结构图; (b) NV色心电子能级跃迁过程示意图, $ {}_{ }{}^{3}{\mathrm{A}}_{2} $$ {}^{3}\mathrm{E} $分别代表基态和激发态, $ {}^{1}{\mathrm{A}}_{1} $$ {}^{1}\mathrm{E} $为中间亚稳态, 从激发态直接跃迁回基态会发出荧光, 而经中间态回基态不会发出荧光

    Figure 5.  (a) NV color center structure; (b) schematic diagram of the transition process of NV color center electron energy level, $ {}^{3}{\mathrm{A}}_{2} $ and $ {}^{3}\mathrm{E} $ represent the ground state and excited state, respectively, $ {}^{1}{\mathrm{A}}_{1} $ and $ {}^{1}\mathrm{E} $ are the intermediate metastable states, which from the excited state directly transitions back to the ground state and emit fluorescence. But the path througt metastable state returns to the ground state without emitting fluorescence.

    图 6  (a)利用共振微波操控NV色心基态能级; (b)可对拓扑相进行分类的3D卷积神经网络的体系结构, 输入是在10 × 10 × 10规则网格上的密度矩阵的实验数据. 每个密度矩阵由八个实数表示. 输出是每个可能相的分类概率[54]

    Figure 6.  (a) Using resonance microwave to control the ground state energy level of NV color center; (b) architecture of the 3D CNN to classify the topological phases. The input is experimental data of density matrices on a 10 × 10 × 10 regular grid. Each density matrix is represented by eight real numbers[54].

    图 7  迭代次数增加时的训练和验证准确性. 训练和验证准确性在训练过程开始时迅速增加, 然后达到了很高的饱和值(≈ 98%)[54]

    Figure 7.  The training and verification accuracy when the number of iterations increases. The training and validation accuracy increased rapidly at the beginning of the training process, and then reached a high saturation value (≈ 98%)[54].

    图 8  共振量子主成分分析算法原理图 (a)探针-寄存器耦合系统的能级结构, $ \left|{\lambda }_{i}\right\rangle $$ {{\rho }} $的第$ i $个本征态, 而$ {\lambda }_{i}\in [0, 1] $是对应的本征值, 如果扫描频率$ \omega \approx {\lambda }_{i} $, 就会引起探针量子位的拉比振荡; (b)使用Suzuki-Trotter分解的RqPCA的量子电路, 对探针量子位进行投影测量得到$ \left|1\right\rangle $表明该算法成功[57]

    Figure 8.  Algorithm schematic of RqPCA: (a) The energy structure of the coupled probe-register system. $ \left|{\lambda }_{i}\right\rangle $ is the i-th eigenstate of $ {{\rho }} $ and $ {\lambda }_{i}\in [0, 1] $ is the corresponding eigenvalue. Once the scanning frequency $ \omega \approx {\lambda }_{i} $, the Rabi oscillations of the probe qubit is induced; (b) the quantum circuit of RqPCA. The projective measurement of the probe qubit in the state $ \left|1\right\rangle $ indicates success of the algorithm, with principal component being distilled in the register[57].

    图 9  (a)量子自编码器线路图, 通过编码操作$ {{\cal{U}}}_{\cal{E}} $$ \left|{\varPsi }_{i}\right\rangle $中的信息压缩到$ {\left|\phi \right\rangle }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}} $中, 在需要时通过解码操作$ {{\cal{U}}}_{\cal{D}} $$ {\left|\phi \right\rangle }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}} $还原为$ \left|{\varPsi }_{f}\right\rangle $; (b)优化编码器的基于梯度算法的HQCA的训练过程, $ {\rho }_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}} $是编码器的输入状态, $ {\rho }_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}} $是辅助量子位的输出状态, $ f\left({{\cal{U}}}_{\cal{E}}^{\left(q\right)}\right) $是成本函数, q是迭代次数[58]

    Figure 9.  (a) Quantum autoencoder circuit. The target information of $ \left|{\varPsi }_{i}\right\rangle $ can be encoded to the code state $ {\left|\phi \right\rangle }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}} $ via the encoder $ {{\cal{U}}}_{\cal{E}} $. $ {\left|\phi \right\rangle }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}} $ can be reconstructed to $ \left|{\varPsi }_{f}\right\rangle $ when needed by the decoder $ {{\cal{U}}}_{\cal{D}} $. (b) Training process of the gradient-based HQCA to optimize encoder. Here, $ {\rho }_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}} $ is the input state of the encoder, and $ {\rho }_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}} $ is the output state on the ancilla qubits. $ f\left({{\cal{U}}}_{\cal{E}}^{\left(q\right)}\right) $ is the cost function, where q is the current iterative number[58].

  • [1]

    Mitchell T M 1997 Machine Learning (Boston, MA, USA: McGraw-Hill)

    [2]

    Carleo G, Cirac I, Cranmer K, Daudet L, Schuld M, Tishby N, Vogt-Maranto L, Zdeborová L 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 045002Google Scholar

    [3]

    Athey S 2018 The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics, in The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) pp507−547

    [4]

    Liakos K G, Busato P, Moshou D, Pearson S, Bochtis D 2018 Sensors 18 2674Google Scholar

    [5]

    Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E 2012 Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 pp1097−1105.

    [6]

    Simonyan K, Zisserman A 2014 arXiv: 1409.1556 [cs.CV]

    [7]

    He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) pp770-778

    [8]

    Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger K Q 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) pp4700−4708

    [9]

    Brown T B, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, Shyam P, Sastry G, Askell A, Agarwal S 2020 arXiv: 2005.14165 [cs.CL]

    [10]

    Rønnow T F, Wang Z, Job J, Boixo S, Isakov S V, Wecker D, Martinis J M, Lidar D A, Troyer M 2014 Science 345 420Google Scholar

    [11]

    Feynman R P 1982 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467Google Scholar

    [12]

    Arute F, Arya K, Babbush R, et al. 2019 Nature 574 505Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhong H S, Wang H, Deng Y H, et al. 2020 Science 370 1460Google Scholar

    [14]

    Biamonte J, Wittek P, Pancotti N, Rebentrost P, Wiebe N, Lloyd S 2017 Nature 549 195Google Scholar

    [15]

    Deutsch D 1985 A. Math. Phys. Sci. 400 97Google Scholar

    [16]

    Shor P W 1994 Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Santa Fe, NM, USA, Nov. 20–22, 1994 pp124−134

    [17]

    Grover L K 1996 Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing Philadelphia PA, USA, 1996 pp212−219

    [18]

    Grover L K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 325Google Scholar

    [19]

    Harrow A W, Hassidim A, Lloyd S 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 150502Google Scholar

    [20]

    Vandersypen L M K, Chuang I L 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 1037Google Scholar

    [21]

    Rabi I I, Zacharias J R, Millman S, Kusch P 1938 Phys. Rev. 53 318Google Scholar

    [22]

    Bloch F 1946 Phys. Rev. 70 460Google Scholar

    [23]

    Stewart W E, Siddall T H 1970 Chem. Rev. 70 517Google Scholar

    [24]

    Hore P J 2015 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (United States: Oxford University Press)

    [25]

    Harris R K 1986 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (United States: OSTI)

    [26]

    Freeman R 1987 Handbook of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (United States: OSTI)

    [27]

    Gershenfeld N A, Chuang I L 1997 Science 275 350Google Scholar

    [28]

    Cory D G, Fahmy A F, Havel T F 1997 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94 1634Google Scholar

    [29]

    Nielsen M A, Chuang I 2001 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary Edition) (United States: Cambridge University Press)

    [30]

    Barz S, Kassal I, Ringbauer M, Lipp Y O, Dakić B, Aspuru-Guzik A, Walther P 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 6115Google Scholar

    [31]

    Pan J, Cao Y, Yao X, Li Z, Ju C, Chen H, Peng X, Kais S, Du J 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 022313Google Scholar

    [32]

    Cai X D, Weedbrook C, Su Z E, Chen M C, Gu M, Zhu M J, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 230501Google Scholar

    [33]

    Subaşı Y, Somma R D, Orsucci D 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 60504Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wen J, Kong X, Wei S, Wang B, Xin T, Long G 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 012320Google Scholar

    [35]

    Leyton S K, Osborne T J 2008 arXiv: 0812.4423 [quant-ph]

    [36]

    Berry D W 2014 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 105301Google Scholar

    [37]

    Berry D W, Childs A M, Ostrander A, Wang G 2017 Commun. Math. Phys. 356 1057Google Scholar

    [38]

    Xin T, Wei S, Cui J, Xiao J, Arrazola I, Lamata L, Kong X, Lu D, Solano E, Long G 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 032307Google Scholar

    [39]

    Shao C, Li Y, Li H 2019 J. Syst. Sci. Complex. 32 375Google Scholar

    [40]

    Platt J C 1998 Technical Report MSR-TR-98-14, Redmond, WA, USA

    [41]

    Rebentrost P, Mohseni M, Lloyd S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 130503Google Scholar

    [42]

    Li Z, Liu X, Xu N, Du J 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 140504Google Scholar

    [43]

    Jolliffe I T 1986 Principal Component Analysis (Berlin: Springer)

    [44]

    Lloyd S, Mohseni M, Rebentrost P 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 631Google Scholar

    [45]

    Xin T, Che L, Xi C, Singh A, Nie X, Li J, Dong Y, Lu D 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 110502Google Scholar

    [46]

    Loubser J H N, Wyk J A 1978 Rep. Prog. Phys. 41 1201Google Scholar

    [47]

    Barry J F, Schloss J M, Bauch E, Turner M J, Hart C A, Pham L M, Walsworth R L 2020 Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 015004Google Scholar

    [48]

    Shi F, Zhang Q, Wang P, Sun H, Wang J, Rong X, Chen M, Ju C, Reinhard F, Chen H, Wrachtrup J, Wang J, Du J 2015 Science 347 1135Google Scholar

    [49]

    Pompili M, Hermans S L N, Baier S, Beukers H K C, Humphreys P C, Schouten R N, Vermeulen R F L, Tiggelman M J, Martins L S, Dirkse B, Wehner S, Hanson R 2021 Science 372 259Google Scholar

    [50]

    Doherty M W, Manson N B, Delaney P, Hollenberg L C L 2011 New J. Phys. 13 025019Google Scholar

    [51]

    Smeltzer B, McIntyre J, Childress L 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 050302(RGoogle Scholar

    [52]

    Manson N B, Harrison J P, Sellars M J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 104303Google Scholar

    [53]

    Batalov A, Zierl C, Gaebel T, Neumann P, Chan I Y, Balasubramanian G, Hemmer P R, Jelezko F, Wrachtrup J 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 077401Google Scholar

    [54]

    Lian W, Wang S T, Lu S, Huang Y, Wang F, Yuan X, Zhang W, Ouyang X, Wang X, Huang X, He L, Chang X, Deng D L, Duan L 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 210503Google Scholar

    [55]

    Gu J, Wang Z, Kuen J, Ma L, Shahroudy A, Shuai B, Liu T, Wang X, Wang G, Cai J, Chen T 2018 Pattern Recognit. 77 354Google Scholar

    [56]

    Kiranyaz S, Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Ince T, Gabbouj M, Inman D J 2021 Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 151 107398Google Scholar

    [57]

    Li Z, Chai Z, Guo Y, Ji W, Wang M, Shi F, Wang Y, Lloyd S, Du J 2021 arXiv: 2104.02476 [quant-ph]

    [58]

    Zhou F, Tian Y, Song Y, Qiu C, Wang X, Chen B, Xu N, Lu D 2021 Preserving Entanglement in a Solid-Spin System Using Quantum Autoencoders Prepr.

    [59]

    Havlíček V, Córcoles A D, Temme K, Harrow A W, Kandala A, Chow J M, Gambetta J M 2019 Nature 567 209Google Scholar

    [60]

    Arrazola J M, Bromley T R, Izaac J, Myers C R, Brádler K, Killoran N 2019 Quantum Sci. Technol. 4 24004Google Scholar

    [61]

    Xiao L, Zhan X, Bian Z H, Wang K K, Zhang X, Wang X P, Li J, Mochizuki K, Kim D, Kawakami N, Yi W, Obuse H, Sanders B C, Xue P 2017 Nature Physics 13 1117Google Scholar

    [62]

    Che Y, Gneiting C, Liu T, Nori F 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 134213Google Scholar

    [63]

    Holanda N L, Griffith M A R 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 054107Google Scholar

    [64]

    Zhang Y, Ginsparg P, Kim E 2020 Phys. Rev. Research 2 023283Google Scholar

    [65]

    Ming Y, Lin C, Bartlett S D, Zhang W 2019 npj Computational Materials 5 88Google Scholar

    [66]

    Zhang P, Shen H, Zhai H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 066401Google Scholar

  • [1] He Jian, Jia Yan-Wei, Tu Ju-Ping, Xia Tian, Zhu Xiao-Hua, Huang Ke, An Kang, Liu Jin-Long, Chen Liang-Xian, Wei Jun-Jun, Li Cheng-Ming. Generation of shallow nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond with carbon ion implantation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(18): 188102. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220794
    [2] Sun Tai-Ping, Wu Yu-Chun, Guo Guo-Ping. Quantum generative models for data generation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(14): 140304. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210930
    [3] Zhao Jian, Chen Zhao-Yun, Zhuang Xi-Ning, Xue Cheng, Wu Yu-Chun, Guo Guo-Ping. Quantum state preparation and its prospects in quantum machine learning. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(14): 140307. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210958
    [4] Feng Yuan-Yao, Li Zhong-Hao, Zhang Yang, Cui Ling-Xiao, Guo Qi, Guo Hao, Wen Huan-Fei, Liu Wen-Yao, Tang Jun, Liu Jun. Optimization of optical control of nitrogen vacancy centers in solid diamond. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(14): 147601. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200072
    [5] Kong Xiang-Yu, Zhu Yuan-Ye, Wen Jing-Wei, Xin Tao, Li Ke-Ren, Long Gui-Lu. New research progress of nuclear magnetic resonance quantum information processing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(22): 220301. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180754
    [6] Pan Jian, Yu Qi, Peng Xin-Hua. Experimental technique for multi-qubit nuclear magnetic resonance system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(15): 150302. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.150302
    [7] Wu Liang, Chen Fang, Huang Chong-Yang, Ding Guo-Hui, Ding Yi-Ming. Multi-exponential inversion of T2 spectrum in NMR based on improved nonlinear fitting. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(10): 107601. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.107601
    [8] Li Zheng, Zhou Rui, Zheng Guo-Qing. Quantum criticalities in carrier-doped iron-based superconductors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(21): 217404. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.217404
    [9] Tian Bao-Feng, Zhou Yuan-Yuan, Wang Yue, Li Zhen-Yu, Yi Xiao-Feng. Noise cancellation method for full-wave magnetic resonance sounding signal based on independent component analysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(22): 229301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.229301
    [10] Ling Hong-Sheng, Tian Jia-Xin, Zhou Shu-Na, Wei Da-Xiu. Time-optimized quantum QFT gate in an Ising coupling system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(17): 170301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.170301
    [11] Li Jun, Cui Jiang-Yu, Yang Xiao-Dong, Luo Zhi-Huang, Pan Jian, Yu Qi, Li Zhao-Kai, Peng Xin-Hua, Du Jiang-Feng. Quantum control of nuclear magnetic resonance spin systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(16): 167601. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.167601
    [12] Li Xin, Xiao Li-Zhi, Liu Hua-Bing, Zhang Zong-Fu, Guo Bao-Xin, Yu Hui-Jun, Zong Fang-Rong. Optimization of nuclear magnetic resonance refocusing pulses to enhance signal intensity in gradient B0 field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(14): 147602. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.147602
    [13] Liu Dong-Qi, Chang Yan-Chun, Liu Gang-Qin, Pan Xin-Yu. Electron spin studies of nitrogen vacancy centers in nanodiamonds. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(16): 164208. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.164208
    [14] Yao Xi-Wei, Zeng Bi-Rong, Liu Qin, Mu Xiao-Yang, Lin Xing-Cheng, Yang Chun, Pan Jian, Chen Zhong. Subspace quantum process tomography via nuclear magnetic resonance. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(10): 6837-6841. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6837
    [15] Li Shao, Ren Yu-Feng, Wang Ning, Tian Ye, Chu Hai-Feng, Li Song-Lin, Chen Ying-Fei, Li Jie, Chen Geng-Hua, Zheng Dong-Ning. Detection of nuclear magnetic resonance in the microtesla range using a high Tc dc-superconducting quantum interference device. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(8): 5744-5749. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5744
    [16] Pan Ke-Jia, Chen Hua, Tan Yong-Ji. Multi-exponential inversion of T2 spectrum in NMR based on differential evolution algorithm. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 5956-5961. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5956
    [17] Xu Feng, Liu Tang-Yan, Huang Yong-Ren. Theoretical description and numerical computation of the relaxation of multi-spin system in the presence of an RF field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(6): 3054-3059. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3054
    [18] Wang He, Li Geng-Ying. Combination of inversion and fitting as an effective method for the analysis of NMR relaxation data. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(3): 1431-1436. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1431
    [19] Xu Feng, Huang Yong-Ren. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(6): 1371-1376. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1371
    [20] . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(2): 415-419. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.415
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  7137
  • PDF Downloads:  346
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  12 April 2021
  • Accepted Date:  25 May 2021
  • Available Online:  15 July 2021
  • Published Online:  20 July 2021

/

返回文章
返回