Fabrication of cyclic olefin polymer and polydimethylsiloxane co-bonded microfluidic device and its appliactions in terahertz biological effects on intestinal cells

Wang Cheng-Yao; Li Xu; Lu Xiao-Yun

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20211807

Abstract

The current research on the terahertz biological effects at a cellular level is limited by the conventional petri dishes used for cell culture, which cannot be directly used for confocal laser microscopy. In this research, the cycloolefin polymer (COP), a material that possesses low terahertz absorption rate but excellent optical property for microscopy, is bonded to polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), thereby developing a novel COP-PDMS microfluidic device by using the techniques of soft etching, photolithography, plasma cleaning, high-temperature and high-pressure incubation. The bonding strength of resulting device is tested by using a push-tension meter. The results indicate that the developed device shows a bonding strength as strong as the device fabricated by quartz and PDMS, which is thought as the tightest binding in the multiple types of microfluidic device. In addition, by perfusing the device chamber at a high flow rate (200 μL/s) and long-term time-course (2 weeks), which simulates the dynamic shearing stress occurring in in-vivo organs and tissues, this COP-PDMS microfluidic device can still maintain the original shape and sealing property, indicating that this device qualifies the requirements of the following dynamic cell culture.The biological effects of terahertz on the cells are explored by using this COP-PDMS microfluidic device mentioned above. In this device, we develop the dynamic culture of intestinal epithelial cells Caco-2 with a perfusion rate of 0.05 μL/s, which meets the findings of the in-vivo gastrointestinal lumen shearing stress. The Caco-2 cells are then irradiated with 0.1 THz wave with the power of 15 mW/cm² for 3 days, and the irradiation duration is 10 min per day. The biological effects of terahertz irradiation on the intercellular tight junction protein ZO-1, the Paxillin relating to the cell adhesion and migration, and the cytoskeletal microfilament protein F-actin of Caco-2 cells are detected in the device directly using the technique of immunofluorescence staining.The results show that the morphology of cell adhesion as well as the level and distribution of ZO-1 and Paxillin are changed. In brief, the protein expression of ZO-1 and Paxillin are induced more by the terahertz irradiation, while the F-actin is not influenced by the irradiation. As can be seen from the F-actin results, the cells without terahertz irradiation show a spread and outward shape with regular smooth cell edge while a contraction and burr shape of cell edge are shown after irradiation, suggesting that the cell adhesion is weakened after irradiation. Even though the expression level of F-actin is consistent, the changed morphology indicates that terahertz may regulate the interaction and aggregation among actin proteins in cells. Interestingly, the ZO-1 presents diffuse distribution in the cells and its location on the cell membrane is not obvious, that is, a large amount of ZO-1 expresses not only on the cell membrane but also in the intracellular matrix after the irradiation. The expression of Paxillin is enhanced after terahertz irradiation, and some cells show local aggregation and distribution of Paxillin. These indicate that the terahertz irradiation might affect the biomolecular mechanism of synthesis and distribution of protein. The COP-PDMS co-bonded microfluidic device developed in this study provides a convenient and effective platform for exploring the biological effects of terahertz irradiation on cells, and is expected to be further used for real-time research on the effects of terahertz on cells and molecules in the future.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
National Center for International Research on Transient Electromagnetics & Applications (TEA), Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Mitochondrial Biology and Medicine, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

Corresponding author: Lu Xiao-Yun, luxy05@xjtu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the China Academy of Engineering Physics (Grant No. U2030105).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Fröhlich H 1975 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72 4211 Google Scholar
[2]	Smye S W, Chamberlain J M, Fitzgerald A J, Berry E 2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 R101 Google Scholar
[3]	Qin J, Ying Y, Xie L 2013 Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 48 439 Google Scholar
[4]	Greschner A A, Ropagnol X, Kort M, Zuberi N, Perreault J, Razzari L, Ozaki T, Gauthier M A 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 3456 Google Scholar
[5]	Yamazaki S, Harata M, Idehara T, Konagaya K, Yokoyama G, Hoshina H, Ogawa Y 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 9990 Google Scholar
[6]	Titova L V, Ayesheshim A K, Golubov A, Fogen D, Rodriguez-Juarez R, Hegmann F A, Kovalchuk O 2013 Biomed. Opt. Express 4 559 Google Scholar
[7]	Olshevskaya J S, Kozlov A, Petrov A K, Zapara T A, Ratushnyak A 2010 Vestn. Novosib. State Univ. Ser. Phys. 5 185
[8]	Alfihed S, Holzman J F, Foulds I G 2020 Biosens. Bioelectron. 165 112393 Google Scholar
[9]	Naftaly M, Gregory A 2021 Appl. Sci. 11 6733 Google Scholar
[10]	Cunningham P, Valdes N, Vallejo F, Hayden L, Polishak B, Zhou X H, Luo J, Jen A, Williams J, Twieg R 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 043505 Google Scholar
[11]	Alfihed S, Bergen M H, Ciocoiu A, Holzman J F, Foulds I G 2018 Micromachines-Basel 9 E453 Google Scholar
[12]	Cheng C, Zhu Z, Li S, Ren G, Zhang J, Cong H, Peng Y, Han J, Chang C, Zhao H 2019 RSC Adv. 9 20240 Google Scholar
[13]	George P A, Hui W, Rana F, Hawkins B G, Smith A E, Kirby B J 2008 Opt. Express 16 1577 Google Scholar
[14]	Wang C, Dang T, Baste J, Joshi A A, Bhushan A 2021 FASEB J. 35 e21291 Google Scholar
[15]	Wang C, Tanataweethum N, Karnik S, Bhushan A 2018 ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4 1377 Google Scholar
[16]	Xu B Y, Yan X N, Xu J J, Chen H Y 2012 Biomicrofluidics 6 16507 Google Scholar
[17]	Jang K J, Mehr A P, Hamilton G A, McPartlin L A, Chung S, Suh K Y, Ingber D E 2013 Integr. Biol. 5 1119 Google Scholar
[18]	Kim S W, Ehrman J, Ahn M R, Kondo J, Lopez A A M, Oh Y S, Kim X H, Crawley S W, Goldenring J R, Tyska M J, Rericha E C, Lau K S 2017 Mol. Biol. Cell 28 3043 Google Scholar
[19]	D'Angelo F, Mics Z, Bonn M, Turchinovich D 2014 Opt. Express 22 12475 Google Scholar
[20]	Kim H T, Jeong O C 2011 Microelectron. Eng. 88 2281 Google Scholar
[21]	Borók A, Laboda K, Bonyár A 2021 Biosensors-Basel 11 292 Google Scholar
[22]	Kratz S R A, Bachmann B, Spitz S, Höll G, Eilenberger C, Goeritz H, Ertl P, Rothbauer M 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1400 Google Scholar
[23]	Xiong L, Chen P, Zhou Q 2014 J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 28 1046 Google Scholar
[24]	Ouellet E, Yang C W, Lin T, Yang L L, Lagally E T 2010 Langmuir 26 11609 Google Scholar
[25]	Rashidi H, Alhaque S, Szkolnicka D, Flint O, Hay D C 2016 Arch. Toxicol. 90 1757 Google Scholar
[26]	Kimura H, Nishikawa M, Yanagawa N, Nakamura H, Miyamoto S, Hamon M, Hauser P, Zhao L, Jo O D, Komeya M, Ogawa T, Yanagawa N 2018 Biomicrofluidics 12 044107 Google Scholar
[27]	Qamar M I, Read A E 1987 Gut 28 583 Google Scholar
[28]	Takahashi T 2011 J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 57 265 Google Scholar
[29]	Paszkowiak J J, Dardik A 2003 Vasc. Endovas. Surg. 37 47 Google Scholar
[30]	van Haaften E E, Wissing T B, Rutten M C M, Bulsink J A, Gashi K, van Kelle M A J, Smits A, Bouten C V C, Kurniawan N A 2018 Tissue Eng. Part C 24 418 Google Scholar
[31]	Morinaga K, Okadome K, Kuroki M, Miyazaki T, Muto Y, Inokuchi K 1985 J. Vasc. Surg. 2 430 Google Scholar
[32]	Koutsiaris A G, Tachmitzi S V, Batis N 2013 Microvasc. Res. 85 34 Google Scholar
[33]	Tan H Y, Trier S, Rahbek U L, Dufva M, Kutter J P, Andresen T L 2018 PLoS One 13 e0197101 Google Scholar
[34]	Delon L C, Guo Z, Oszmiana A, Chien C-C, Gibson R, Prestidge C, Thierry B 2019 Biomaterials 225 119521 Google Scholar
[35]	Chi M, Yi B, Oh S, Park D, Sung J H, Park S 2015 Biomed. Microdevices 17 9966 Google Scholar
[36]	Sakharov D, Maltseva D, Knyazev E, Nikulin S, Poloznikov A, Shilin S, Baranova A, Tsypina I, Tonevitsky A 2019 BMC Syst. Biol. 13 19 Google Scholar
[37]	Strelnikova N, Herren F, Schoenenberger C A, Pfohl T 2016 Front. Mater. 3 20 Google Scholar
[38]	Spuul P, Chi P Y, Billottet C, Chou C F, Génot E 2016 Methods 94 65 Google Scholar
[39]	Cheng M, Guan X, Li H, Cui X, Zhang X, Li X, Jing X, Wu H, Avsar E 2013 PLoS One 8 e67675 Google Scholar
[40]	Manevich E, Grabovsky V, Feigelson S W, Alon R 2007 J. Biol. Chem. 282 25338 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 COP-PDMS共键合微流控芯片倒模制作图例　(a) 通过光刻技术形成以SU-8和硅片为基底的圆形微流控芯片阵列式模具; (b) 切割后的单个微流控芯片模块; (c) PDMS模块与COP板材通过等离子处理后键合; (d) 在形成的COP-PDMS微流控沟道中进行动态细胞培养的侧面图; (e) 含有细胞的微流控沟道的三维图

Figure 1. Schematic fabrication process of COP-PDMS co-bonded microfluidic device: (a) Using soft lithography technology to prepare the round microfluidic device array mold on the SU-8 and silicon wafer; (b) the single microfluidic device module; (c) the PDMS module and COP plate are fabricated by plasma treatment; (d) side view of cells dynamically cultured in the COP-PDMS microfluidic channel; (e) three-dimensional view of microfluidic channels containing cells.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 A1 微流控芯片沟道设计CAD图及设计参数

Figure A1. CAD drawing and design parameters of the channel design of microfluidic chip.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 两种微流控材料—COP和PDMS在太赫兹频段0.1—2.4 THz范围内的吸收光谱

Figure 2. The THz absorption map of two characteristic materials: COP and PDMS, between the frequency from 0.1 to 2.4 THz.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 A2 COP材料等离子改性前后亲水性测试

Figure A2. Hydrophilicity test of COP material before and after plasma modification.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 (a) 键合过程加压后(0至5000 Pa) COP-PDMS微流控芯片的键合强度测试结果, 键合强度代表的是完全剥离两种材料需要的剪切应力, 该剪切应力通过推拉力计测量得出; (b) 芯片键合强度与额外加压的对应关系; (c) 高灌注速率(200 μL/s)下沟道变形及密封度变化情况; (d) 2 周长时程动态灌注(灌注速率为0.05 μL/s)后沟道形变及密封度变化情况

Figure 3. (a) Bonding strength test results of COP-PDMS microfluidic device with the vary compressions (0 to 5000 Pa) during the bonding process. The bonding strength represents the shear stress required for completely stripping two materials, which is measured by push-tension meter. (b) The corresponding relationship between the bonding strength of microfluidic device and the compressions during the bonding process. (c) The seal and deformation change of channels and chamber at high fluid perfusion rate (200 μL/s). (d) The seal and deformation change of channels and chamber after a 2-week time-course dynamic perfusion (0.05 μL/s)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 A3 在COP-PDMS微流控芯片中动态和静态培养中, Caco-2细胞的ZO-1, Paxillin和F-actin的免疫荧光检测(图中基准尺为20 μm)　(a) ZO-1与F-actin的免疫荧光染色; (b) Paxillin与F-actin的免疫荧光染色; (c) 对(a)和(b)图中太赫兹辐照前后ZO-1, Paxillin和F-actin免疫荧光强度定量分析结果(t检验显著性差异: p < 0.05, *; p < 0.01, **)

Figure A3. Immunofluorescence staining results of Caco-2 cells that are dynamically and statically cultured in COP-PDMS microfluidic device (scale bar: 20 μm). (a) The confocal result of ZO-1 and F-actin. (b) The confocal result of Paxillin and F-actin. (c) Quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence intensity of ZO-1, Paxillin and F-actin of the cells in panel (a) and (b): The quantification is determined as immunofluorescence intensity corresponding to 10⁴ nuclei (significance of t-test: p < 0.05, *; p < 0.01, **).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 太赫兹辐照对COP-PDMS微流控芯片中动态培养的Caco-2细胞的ZO-1, Paxillin和F-actin的免疫荧光检测(图中基准尺为20 μm)　(a) ZO-1与F-actin的免疫荧光染色; (b) Paxillin与F-actin的免疫荧光染色; (c) 对(a)和(b)图中太赫兹辐照前后ZO-1, Paxillin和F-actin免疫荧光强度定量分析结果(t检验显著性差异: p < 0.05, *; p < 0.01, **)

Figure 4. Immunofluorescence staining results of Caco-2 cells that are dynamically cultured in COP-PDMS microfluidic device, before and after terahertz irradiation (scale bar: 20 μm). (a) The confocal result of ZO-1 and F-actin. (b) The confocal result of Paxillin and F-actin. (c) Quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence intensity of ZO-1, Paxillin and F-actin of the cells in panel (a) and (b): The quantification is determined as immunofluorescence intensity corresponding to 10⁴ nuclei (significance of t-test: p < 0.05, *; p < 0.01, **).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 生物体内各个组织器官中的流体剪切应力及在COP-PDMS微流控芯片中模拟对应流体剪切应力需要的流体流量

Table 1. Shearing stress in the in-vivo tissues and the corresponding fluidic perfusion rate in the COP-PDMS microfluidic device to simulate the shearing stress.

器官	流体剪切应力 τ/(dyne·cm^–2)		对应微流控流量 Q/(μL·s^–1)
器官	最小值	最大值	最小值	最大值
肝脏^[25]	0.1	0.5	0.2	1.1
肾脏^[26]	0.2	5.0	0.4	10.7
肠道血管^[27,28]	2.2	5.5	4.8	11.7
主动脉^[25]	1.0	22.0	2.1	47.0
动脉^[17,29]	10.0	70.0	21.3	149.4
静脉^[30,31]	1.0	6.0	2.1	12.8
毛细血管^[25,32]	3.0	95.0	6.4	202.8
活肾小管^[17,18]	0.2		0.4
肠上皮的生理管腔应力^[17,18]	0.025		0.0534

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Fröhlich H 1975 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72 4211 Google Scholar
[2]	Smye S W, Chamberlain J M, Fitzgerald A J, Berry E 2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 R101 Google Scholar
[3]	Qin J, Ying Y, Xie L 2013 Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 48 439 Google Scholar
[4]	Greschner A A, Ropagnol X, Kort M, Zuberi N, Perreault J, Razzari L, Ozaki T, Gauthier M A 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 3456 Google Scholar
[5]	Yamazaki S, Harata M, Idehara T, Konagaya K, Yokoyama G, Hoshina H, Ogawa Y 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 9990 Google Scholar
[6]	Titova L V, Ayesheshim A K, Golubov A, Fogen D, Rodriguez-Juarez R, Hegmann F A, Kovalchuk O 2013 Biomed. Opt. Express 4 559 Google Scholar
[7]	Olshevskaya J S, Kozlov A, Petrov A K, Zapara T A, Ratushnyak A 2010 Vestn. Novosib. State Univ. Ser. Phys. 5 185
[8]	Alfihed S, Holzman J F, Foulds I G 2020 Biosens. Bioelectron. 165 112393 Google Scholar
[9]	Naftaly M, Gregory A 2021 Appl. Sci. 11 6733 Google Scholar
[10]	Cunningham P, Valdes N, Vallejo F, Hayden L, Polishak B, Zhou X H, Luo J, Jen A, Williams J, Twieg R 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 043505 Google Scholar
[11]	Alfihed S, Bergen M H, Ciocoiu A, Holzman J F, Foulds I G 2018 Micromachines-Basel 9 E453 Google Scholar
[12]	Cheng C, Zhu Z, Li S, Ren G, Zhang J, Cong H, Peng Y, Han J, Chang C, Zhao H 2019 RSC Adv. 9 20240 Google Scholar
[13]	George P A, Hui W, Rana F, Hawkins B G, Smith A E, Kirby B J 2008 Opt. Express 16 1577 Google Scholar
[14]	Wang C, Dang T, Baste J, Joshi A A, Bhushan A 2021 FASEB J. 35 e21291 Google Scholar
[15]	Wang C, Tanataweethum N, Karnik S, Bhushan A 2018 ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4 1377 Google Scholar
[16]	Xu B Y, Yan X N, Xu J J, Chen H Y 2012 Biomicrofluidics 6 16507 Google Scholar
[17]	Jang K J, Mehr A P, Hamilton G A, McPartlin L A, Chung S, Suh K Y, Ingber D E 2013 Integr. Biol. 5 1119 Google Scholar
[18]	Kim S W, Ehrman J, Ahn M R, Kondo J, Lopez A A M, Oh Y S, Kim X H, Crawley S W, Goldenring J R, Tyska M J, Rericha E C, Lau K S 2017 Mol. Biol. Cell 28 3043 Google Scholar
[19]	D'Angelo F, Mics Z, Bonn M, Turchinovich D 2014 Opt. Express 22 12475 Google Scholar
[20]	Kim H T, Jeong O C 2011 Microelectron. Eng. 88 2281 Google Scholar
[21]	Borók A, Laboda K, Bonyár A 2021 Biosensors-Basel 11 292 Google Scholar
[22]	Kratz S R A, Bachmann B, Spitz S, Höll G, Eilenberger C, Goeritz H, Ertl P, Rothbauer M 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1400 Google Scholar
[23]	Xiong L, Chen P, Zhou Q 2014 J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 28 1046 Google Scholar
[24]	Ouellet E, Yang C W, Lin T, Yang L L, Lagally E T 2010 Langmuir 26 11609 Google Scholar
[25]	Rashidi H, Alhaque S, Szkolnicka D, Flint O, Hay D C 2016 Arch. Toxicol. 90 1757 Google Scholar
[26]	Kimura H, Nishikawa M, Yanagawa N, Nakamura H, Miyamoto S, Hamon M, Hauser P, Zhao L, Jo O D, Komeya M, Ogawa T, Yanagawa N 2018 Biomicrofluidics 12 044107 Google Scholar
[27]	Qamar M I, Read A E 1987 Gut 28 583 Google Scholar
[28]	Takahashi T 2011 J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 57 265 Google Scholar
[29]	Paszkowiak J J, Dardik A 2003 Vasc. Endovas. Surg. 37 47 Google Scholar
[30]	van Haaften E E, Wissing T B, Rutten M C M, Bulsink J A, Gashi K, van Kelle M A J, Smits A, Bouten C V C, Kurniawan N A 2018 Tissue Eng. Part C 24 418 Google Scholar
[31]	Morinaga K, Okadome K, Kuroki M, Miyazaki T, Muto Y, Inokuchi K 1985 J. Vasc. Surg. 2 430 Google Scholar
[32]	Koutsiaris A G, Tachmitzi S V, Batis N 2013 Microvasc. Res. 85 34 Google Scholar
[33]	Tan H Y, Trier S, Rahbek U L, Dufva M, Kutter J P, Andresen T L 2018 PLoS One 13 e0197101 Google Scholar
[34]	Delon L C, Guo Z, Oszmiana A, Chien C-C, Gibson R, Prestidge C, Thierry B 2019 Biomaterials 225 119521 Google Scholar
[35]	Chi M, Yi B, Oh S, Park D, Sung J H, Park S 2015 Biomed. Microdevices 17 9966 Google Scholar
[36]	Sakharov D, Maltseva D, Knyazev E, Nikulin S, Poloznikov A, Shilin S, Baranova A, Tsypina I, Tonevitsky A 2019 BMC Syst. Biol. 13 19 Google Scholar
[37]	Strelnikova N, Herren F, Schoenenberger C A, Pfohl T 2016 Front. Mater. 3 20 Google Scholar
[38]	Spuul P, Chi P Y, Billottet C, Chou C F, Génot E 2016 Methods 94 65 Google Scholar
[39]	Cheng M, Guan X, Li H, Cui X, Zhang X, Li X, Jing X, Wu H, Avsar E 2013 PLoS One 8 e67675 Google Scholar
[40]	Manevich E, Grabovsky V, Feigelson S W, Alon R 2007 J. Biol. Chem. 282 25338 Google Scholar

[1]	. Research progress on biological effects of cell membrane under infrared and terahertz irradiation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212030
[2]	. Biological effects of terahertz waves. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211996
[3]	Bo Wen-Fei, Che Rong, Kong Lei, Zhang Ming-Jie, Zhang Xiao-Bo. Research progress of biological effects of cell membrane under infrared and terahertz irradiation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(24): 248707. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20212030
[4]	Peng Xiao-Yu, Zhou Huan. Biological effects of terahertz waves. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(24): 240701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211996
[5]	Deng Zi-Long, Li Peng-Yu, Zhang Xuan, Liu Xiang-Dong. Semi-obstructed splitting behaviors of droplet in an asymmetric microfluidic T-junction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(7): 074701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201171
[6]	Ren Zhuang, Cheng Long, Sergei Guretskii, Nadzeya Liubochko, Li Jiang-Tao, Shang Jia-Min, Sergei Barilo, Wu An-Hua, Alexandra Kalashnikova, Ma Zong-Wei, Zhou Chun, Sheng Zhi-Gao. Terahertz spectroscopy study of doping and magnetic field induced effects on spin reorientation in Ho_1–xY_xFeO₃ single crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(20): 207802. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201518
[7]	Wang Yue-Tong, Shang Luo-Ran, Zhao Yuan-Jin. Surface-textured polymer microspheres generated through interfacial instabilities of microfluidic droplets for cell capture. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(8): 084701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200362
[8]	Li Lei, Zhang Cheng-Bin. Mechanism for regulation and control of emulsion droplet generation in co-flow microfluidic device via electric field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(17): 176801. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180616
[9]	Duan Xing-Yue, Li Xiao-Kang, Cheng Mou-Sen, Li Gan. Numerical investigation on shielding properties of the laser ablation plume of polymer doped metal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(19): 197901. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.197901
[10]	Min Ling-Li, Chen Song-yue, Sheng Zhi-Zhi, Wang Hong-Long, Wu Feng, Wang Miao, Hou Xu. Development and application of bio-inspired and biomimetic microfluidics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(17): 178301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.178301
[11]	Hou Li-Kai, Ren Yu-Kun, Jiang Hong-Yuan. Electrorotation characteristics of gold-coated SU-8 microrods at low frequency. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(20): 200702. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.200702
[12]	Li Guo-Long, Li Jin. The light absorption enhancement in polymer solar cells with periodic nano-structures gratings. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(20): 207204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.207204
[13]	Zeng Guang-Sheng, Qu Jin-Ping, Liu Yue-Jun, Xu Chao, Xu Cheng. Hysteresis thermogenous process of polymer material under vibrational force field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(1): 016401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.016401
[14]	Su Jin, Ouyang Jie, Wang Xiao-Dong. Micro-macro numerical simulation of rod-like polymeric solutions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(5): 3362-3369. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3362
[15]	Wang Xiao-Dong, Ouyang Jie, Su Jin. Simulation of microstructure of liquid-crystalline polymers in nonhomogenous shear flow by EFG method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(9): 6369-6376. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6369
[16]	Wang Dou-Dou, Wang Li-Li. Design and characteristics of novel optical polymer Topas COC-based microstructured optical fiber. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(5): 3255-3259. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3255
[17]	Huang Wen-Bo, Zeng Wen-Jin, Wang Li, Peng Jun-Biao. Negative capacitance in polymer light-emitting diodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 5983-5988. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5983
[18]	Zhang Ya-Ni. High birefringence tunable effect of microstructured polymer optical fiber. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 5729-5734. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5729
[19]	Li Bao-Xing, Ye Mei-Ying, Chu Qiao-Yan, Yu Jian. Investigation on micro-modification mechanism on surface of microfluidic glass chip. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(6): 3446-3452. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3446
[20]	SHUAI ZHI-GANG, SUN XIN, FU ROU-LI. NONLINEAR OPTICAL EFFECTS IN CONDUCTING POLYMERS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1990, 39(3): 375-380. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.375

Catalog

Vol. 70, Issue 24 - 2021-12-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 7525
PDF Downloads: 157
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板