-
In a quantum system with spin, spin-orbit coupling is manifested by linking the spin angular momentum of a particle with its orbital angular momentum, which leads to many exotic phenomena. The experimental realization of synthetic spin-orbit coupling effects in ultra-cold atomic systems provides an entirely new platform for exploring quantum simulations. In a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate, the spin-orbit coupling can change the properties of the system significantly, which offers an excellent opportunity to investigate the influence of spin-orbit coupling on the quantum state at the macroscopic level. As typical states of macroscopic quantum effects, solitons in spin-orbit coupled Bose-Einstein condensates can be manipulated by spin-orbit coupling directly, which makes the study on spin-orbit coupled Bose-Einstein condensates become one of the hottest topics in the research of ultracold atomic physics in recent years. This paper investigates exact vector soliton solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the one-dimensional spin-orbit coupled binary Bose-Einstein condensates, which has four parameters
$\mu$ ,$\delta$ ,$\alpha$ and$\beta$ , where$\mu$ denotes the strength of the spin-orbit coupling,$\delta$ is the detuning parameter,$\alpha$ and$\beta$ are the parameters of the self- and cross-interaction, respectively. For the case$\beta=\alpha$ , by a direct ansatz, two kinds of stripe solitons, namely, the oscillating dark-dark solitons are obtained; meanwhile, a transformation is presented such that from the solutions of the integrable Manakov system, one can get soliton solutions for the spin-orbit coupled Gross-Pitaevskii equation. For the case$\beta=3\alpha$ , a bright-W type soliton for$\alpha>0$ and a kink-antikink type soliton for$\alpha<0$ are presented. It is found that the relation between$\mu$ and$\delta$ can affect the states of the solitons. Based on these solutions, the corresponding dynamics and the impact of the spin-orbit coupling effects on the quantum magnetization and spin-polarized domains are discussed. Our results show that spin-orbit coupling can result in rich kinds of soliton states in the two-component Bose gases, including the stripe solitons as well as the classical non-stripe solitons, and various kinds of multi-solitons. Furthermore, spin-orbit coupling has a remarkable influence on the behaviors of quantum magnetization. In the experiments of Bose-Einstein condensates, there have been many different methods to observe the soliton states of the population distribution, the magnetic solitons, and the spin domains, so our results provide some possible options for the related experiments.-
Keywords:
- Bose-Einstein condensate /
- spin-orbit coupling /
- Gross-Pitaevskii equation /
- soliton
[1] Pitaevskii L, Stringari S 2016 Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
[2] Proukakis N P, Snoke D W, Littlewood P B 2017 Universal Themes of Bose-Einstein Condensation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[3] Zhai H 2020 Ultracold Atomic Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[4] Kawaguchi Y, Ueda M 2012 Phys. Rep. 520 253Google Scholar
[5] Stamper-Kurn D M, Ueda M 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 1191Google Scholar
[6] Liu W M, Kengne E 2019 Schrödinger Equations in Nonlinear Systems (Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd)
[7] Lin Y J, Jiménez-García K, Spielman I B 2011 Nature 471 83Google Scholar
[8] Zhang J Y, Ji S C, Chen Z, Zhang L, Du Z D, Yan B, Pan G S, Zhao B, Deng Y J, Zhai H, Chen S, Pan J W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 115301Google Scholar
[9] Wang P, Yu Z Q, Fu Z, Miao J, Huang L, Chai S, Zhai H, Zhang J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 095301Google Scholar
[10] Cheuk L W, Sommer A T, Hadzibabic Z, Yefsah T, Bakr W S, Zwierlein M W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 095302Google Scholar
[11] Zhai H 2015 Rep. Prog. Phys. 78 026001Google Scholar
[12] Zhang Y P, Mossman M E, Busch T, Engels P, Zhang C W 2016 Front. Phys. 11 118103Google Scholar
[13] 李吉, 刘伍明 2018 物理学报 67 110302Google Scholar
Li J, Liu W M 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 110302Google Scholar
[14] Zhang S C, Jo G B 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 128 75Google Scholar
[15] 王力, 刘静思, 李吉, 周晓林, 陈向荣, 刘超飞, 刘伍明 2020 物理学报 69 010303Google Scholar
Wang L, Liu J S, Li J, Zhou X L, Chen X R, Liu C F, Liu W M 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 010303Google Scholar
[16] 施婷婷, 汪六九, 王璟琨, 张威 2020 物理学报 69 016701Google Scholar
Shi T T, Wang L J, Wang J K, Zhang W 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 016701Google Scholar
[17] Achilleos V, Frantzeskakis D J, Kevrekidis P G, Pelinovsky D E 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 264101Google Scholar
[18] Achilleos V, Stockhofe J, Frantzeskakis D J, Kevrekidis P G, Schmelcher P 2013 EPL 103 20002Google Scholar
[19] Lobanov V E, Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 180403Google Scholar
[20] Li Y Y, Luo Z H, Liu Y, Chen Z P, Huang C Q, Fu S H, Tan H S, Malomed B A 2017 New. J. Phys. 19 113043Google Scholar
[21] Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 190401Google Scholar
[22] Sakaguchi H, Malomed B A 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013607Google Scholar
[23] Wang C, Gao C, Jian C M, Zhai H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 160403Google Scholar
[24] Bhuvaneswari S, Nithyanandan K, Muruganandam P 2018 J. Phys. Commun. 2 025008Google Scholar
[25] Xu X Q, Han J H 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 200401Google Scholar
[26] Radić J, Sedrakyan T A, Spielman I B, Galitski V 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 063604Google Scholar
[27] Li J R, Lee J, Huang W, Burchesky S, Shteynas B, Top F Ç, Jamison A O, Ketterle W 2017 Nature 543 91Google Scholar
[28] Léonard J, Morales A, Zupancic P, Esslinger T, Donner T 2017 Nature 543 87Google Scholar
[29] Khaykovich L, Schreck F, Ferrari G, Bourdel T, Cubizolles J, Carr L D, Castin Y, Salomo C 2002 Science 296 1290Google Scholar
[30] Nguyen J H V, Luo D, Hulet R G 2017 Science 356 422Google Scholar
[31] Kengne E, Liu W M, Malomed B A 2021 Phys. Rep. 899 1Google Scholar
[32] Xu Y, Zhang Y P, Wu B 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013614Google Scholar
[33] Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V, Abdullaev F Kh 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 060402Google Scholar
[34] Sakaguchi H, Li B, Malomed B A 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 032920Google Scholar
[35] Cao S, Shan C J, Zhang D W, Qin X Z, Xu J 2015 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32 201Google Scholar
[36] Qu C L, Pitaevskii L P, Stringari S 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 160402Google Scholar
[37] Chiquillo E 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013614Google Scholar
[38] Farolfi A, Trypogeorgos D, Mordini C, Lamporesi G, Ferrari G 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 030401Google Scholar
[39] Chai X, Lao D, Fujimoto K, Raman C 2021 Phys. Rev. Res. 3 L012003Google Scholar
[40] Liu Y K, Yang S J 2014 EPL 108 30004Google Scholar
[41] Gautam S, Adhikari S K 2021 Braz. J. Phys. 51 298Google Scholar
[42] He J T, Fang P P, Lin J 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 020301Google Scholar
[43] Yang Y, Gao P, Wu Z, Zhao L C, Yang Z Y 2021 Annals of Physics 431 168562Google Scholar
[44] Yang Y, Gao P, Zhao L C, Yang Z Y 2022 Front. Phys. 17 32503Google Scholar
[45] De S, Campbell D L, Price R M, Putra A, Anderson B M, Spielman I B 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 033631Google Scholar
[46] Sakaguchi H, Malomed B A 2019 Symmetry 11 388Google Scholar
[47] Zakharov V E, Schulman E I 1982 Phys. D 4 270Google Scholar
[48] Manakov S V 1973 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65 1392
[49] Yang J K 2010 Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Nonintegrable Systems (Philadelphia: SIAM) pp79–118
[50] Guo B L, Ling L M 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 110202Google Scholar
[51] Qin Y H, Zhao L C, Ling L 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 022212Google Scholar
[52] Qin Y H, Wu Y, Zhao L C, Yang Z Y 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 020303Google Scholar
[53] Tian H Y, Tian B, Yuan Y Q, Zhang C R 2021 Phys. Scr. 96 045213Google Scholar
[54] Radhakrishnan R, Lakshmanan M 1995 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28 2683Google Scholar
[55] Lan Y, Zhao L C, Luo X W 2019 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 70 334Google Scholar
[56] Ohta Y, Wang D S, Yang J K 2011 Stud. Appl. Math. 127 345Google Scholar
[57] Yan C T 1996 Phys. Lett. A 224 77Google Scholar
[58] Punya A, Lambrecht W R L 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 195147Google Scholar
[59] Sheng X L, Wang Z J, Yu R, Weng H M, Fang Z, Dai X 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 245308Google Scholar
[60] Łepkowski S P, Bardyszewski W 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 15403Google Scholar
-
图 1 (5)式对应的SOC调制的条纹暗孤子. 暗孤子的均匀背景被SOC调制为周期背景, 暗孤子中心与周期背景产生能量交换, 形成了周期背景中的呼吸子传播. 参数取值为
$k= 1$ ,$\delta = 0$ ,$\mu = 3$ ,$\omega = 2$ ,$\alpha = -1$ Figure 1. Stripe dark soliton given by Eq. (5). The uniform background of the dark soliton is modulated by the SOC into the periodic background, and the energy exchange between the center of the dark soliton and the periodic background results in a breather like soliton propagating in the periodic background. The parameters are chosen as
$k = 1$ ,$\delta = 0$ ,$\mu = 3$ ,$\omega = 2$ ,$\alpha = -1$ 图 2 (5)式对应的不同参数下的赝自旋演化 (a)
$\mu=3/2$ ,$\delta=0$ ,$\omega=-4$ ; (b)$\mu=1/2$ ,$\delta=-1$ ,$\omega=-4$ ; (c)$\delta=1$ ,$\mu=1$ ,$\omega=-4$ . 其他参数为$k=1$ ,$\alpha=-1$ Figure 2. Evolution of pseudo-spin corresponding to Eq. (5) with different parameters: (a)
$\mu=3/2$ ,$\delta=0$ ,$\omega=-4$ ; (b)$\mu=1/2$ ,$\delta=-1$ ,$\omega=-4$ ; (c)$\delta=1$ ,$\mu=1$ ,$\omega=-4$ . Other parameters are taken as$k=1$ ,$\alpha=-1$ 图 3 (7)式对应的不同参数下的密度分布和磁化分布 (a)—(c)
$\mu = 3/2$ ,$\delta = 0$ ; (d)—(f)$\mu=1$ ,$\delta=-2$ . 其他参数为$G_1 = 2$ ,$G_2 = 1$ ,$k = 1$ ,$\alpha = -1$ Figure 3. Distributions of the density and magnetization corresponding to Eq. (7) with different parameters: (a)–(c)
$\mu = 3/2$ ,$\delta = 0$ ; (d)–(f)$\mu=1$ ,$\delta=-2$ . Other parameters are taken as$G_1 = 2$ ,$G_2 = 1$ ,$k = 1$ ,$\alpha = -1$ 图 4 (7)式对应的不同参数下的赝自旋演化 (a)
$\mu=3/2$ ,$\delta=0$ ; (b)$\mu=1$ ,$\delta=-2$ ; (c)$\delta=1$ ,$\mu=1$ . 其他参数为$G_1=2$ ,$G_2=1$ ,$k=1$ ,$\alpha=-1$ Figure 4. Evolution of pseudo-spin corresponding to Eq. (7) with the different parameters: (a)
$\mu=3/2$ ,$\delta=0$ ; (b)$\mu=1$ ,$\delta=-2$ ; (c)$\delta=1$ ,$\mu=1$ . Other parameters are taken as$G_1=2$ ,$G_2=1$ ,$k=1$ ,$\alpha=-1$ -
[1] Pitaevskii L, Stringari S 2016 Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
[2] Proukakis N P, Snoke D W, Littlewood P B 2017 Universal Themes of Bose-Einstein Condensation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[3] Zhai H 2020 Ultracold Atomic Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[4] Kawaguchi Y, Ueda M 2012 Phys. Rep. 520 253Google Scholar
[5] Stamper-Kurn D M, Ueda M 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 1191Google Scholar
[6] Liu W M, Kengne E 2019 Schrödinger Equations in Nonlinear Systems (Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd)
[7] Lin Y J, Jiménez-García K, Spielman I B 2011 Nature 471 83Google Scholar
[8] Zhang J Y, Ji S C, Chen Z, Zhang L, Du Z D, Yan B, Pan G S, Zhao B, Deng Y J, Zhai H, Chen S, Pan J W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 115301Google Scholar
[9] Wang P, Yu Z Q, Fu Z, Miao J, Huang L, Chai S, Zhai H, Zhang J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 095301Google Scholar
[10] Cheuk L W, Sommer A T, Hadzibabic Z, Yefsah T, Bakr W S, Zwierlein M W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 095302Google Scholar
[11] Zhai H 2015 Rep. Prog. Phys. 78 026001Google Scholar
[12] Zhang Y P, Mossman M E, Busch T, Engels P, Zhang C W 2016 Front. Phys. 11 118103Google Scholar
[13] 李吉, 刘伍明 2018 物理学报 67 110302Google Scholar
Li J, Liu W M 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 110302Google Scholar
[14] Zhang S C, Jo G B 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 128 75Google Scholar
[15] 王力, 刘静思, 李吉, 周晓林, 陈向荣, 刘超飞, 刘伍明 2020 物理学报 69 010303Google Scholar
Wang L, Liu J S, Li J, Zhou X L, Chen X R, Liu C F, Liu W M 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 010303Google Scholar
[16] 施婷婷, 汪六九, 王璟琨, 张威 2020 物理学报 69 016701Google Scholar
Shi T T, Wang L J, Wang J K, Zhang W 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 016701Google Scholar
[17] Achilleos V, Frantzeskakis D J, Kevrekidis P G, Pelinovsky D E 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 264101Google Scholar
[18] Achilleos V, Stockhofe J, Frantzeskakis D J, Kevrekidis P G, Schmelcher P 2013 EPL 103 20002Google Scholar
[19] Lobanov V E, Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 180403Google Scholar
[20] Li Y Y, Luo Z H, Liu Y, Chen Z P, Huang C Q, Fu S H, Tan H S, Malomed B A 2017 New. J. Phys. 19 113043Google Scholar
[21] Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 190401Google Scholar
[22] Sakaguchi H, Malomed B A 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013607Google Scholar
[23] Wang C, Gao C, Jian C M, Zhai H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 160403Google Scholar
[24] Bhuvaneswari S, Nithyanandan K, Muruganandam P 2018 J. Phys. Commun. 2 025008Google Scholar
[25] Xu X Q, Han J H 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 200401Google Scholar
[26] Radić J, Sedrakyan T A, Spielman I B, Galitski V 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 063604Google Scholar
[27] Li J R, Lee J, Huang W, Burchesky S, Shteynas B, Top F Ç, Jamison A O, Ketterle W 2017 Nature 543 91Google Scholar
[28] Léonard J, Morales A, Zupancic P, Esslinger T, Donner T 2017 Nature 543 87Google Scholar
[29] Khaykovich L, Schreck F, Ferrari G, Bourdel T, Cubizolles J, Carr L D, Castin Y, Salomo C 2002 Science 296 1290Google Scholar
[30] Nguyen J H V, Luo D, Hulet R G 2017 Science 356 422Google Scholar
[31] Kengne E, Liu W M, Malomed B A 2021 Phys. Rep. 899 1Google Scholar
[32] Xu Y, Zhang Y P, Wu B 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013614Google Scholar
[33] Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V, Abdullaev F Kh 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 060402Google Scholar
[34] Sakaguchi H, Li B, Malomed B A 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 032920Google Scholar
[35] Cao S, Shan C J, Zhang D W, Qin X Z, Xu J 2015 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32 201Google Scholar
[36] Qu C L, Pitaevskii L P, Stringari S 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 160402Google Scholar
[37] Chiquillo E 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013614Google Scholar
[38] Farolfi A, Trypogeorgos D, Mordini C, Lamporesi G, Ferrari G 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 030401Google Scholar
[39] Chai X, Lao D, Fujimoto K, Raman C 2021 Phys. Rev. Res. 3 L012003Google Scholar
[40] Liu Y K, Yang S J 2014 EPL 108 30004Google Scholar
[41] Gautam S, Adhikari S K 2021 Braz. J. Phys. 51 298Google Scholar
[42] He J T, Fang P P, Lin J 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 020301Google Scholar
[43] Yang Y, Gao P, Wu Z, Zhao L C, Yang Z Y 2021 Annals of Physics 431 168562Google Scholar
[44] Yang Y, Gao P, Zhao L C, Yang Z Y 2022 Front. Phys. 17 32503Google Scholar
[45] De S, Campbell D L, Price R M, Putra A, Anderson B M, Spielman I B 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 033631Google Scholar
[46] Sakaguchi H, Malomed B A 2019 Symmetry 11 388Google Scholar
[47] Zakharov V E, Schulman E I 1982 Phys. D 4 270Google Scholar
[48] Manakov S V 1973 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65 1392
[49] Yang J K 2010 Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Nonintegrable Systems (Philadelphia: SIAM) pp79–118
[50] Guo B L, Ling L M 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 110202Google Scholar
[51] Qin Y H, Zhao L C, Ling L 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 022212Google Scholar
[52] Qin Y H, Wu Y, Zhao L C, Yang Z Y 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 020303Google Scholar
[53] Tian H Y, Tian B, Yuan Y Q, Zhang C R 2021 Phys. Scr. 96 045213Google Scholar
[54] Radhakrishnan R, Lakshmanan M 1995 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28 2683Google Scholar
[55] Lan Y, Zhao L C, Luo X W 2019 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 70 334Google Scholar
[56] Ohta Y, Wang D S, Yang J K 2011 Stud. Appl. Math. 127 345Google Scholar
[57] Yan C T 1996 Phys. Lett. A 224 77Google Scholar
[58] Punya A, Lambrecht W R L 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 195147Google Scholar
[59] Sheng X L, Wang Z J, Yu R, Weng H M, Fang Z, Dai X 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 245308Google Scholar
[60] Łepkowski S P, Bardyszewski W 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 15403Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4141
- PDF Downloads: 164
- Cited By: 0