Influence of period number of superlattice electron barrier layer on the performance of AlGaN-based deep ultraviolet LED

Liu Ju; Cao Yi-Wei; Lv Quan-Jiang; Yang Tian-Peng; Mi Ting-Ting; Wang Xiao-Wen; Liu Jun-Lin

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20231969

Abstract

The development of AlGaN-based deep ultraviolet light emitting diodes (DUV-LEDs) is currently limited by poor external quantum efficiency (EQE) and wall-plug efficiency (WPE). Internal quantum efficiency (IQE), as an important component of EQE, plays a crucial role in improving the performance of DUV-LEDs. The IQE is related to the carrier injection efficiency and the radiation recombination rate in the active region. In order to improve the IQE of AlGaN-based DUV-LEDs, this work proposes a scheme to optimize the period number of superlattice electron barrier layer (SL-EBL) to achieve better carrier injection efficiency and confinement capability. The effect of the period number of SL-EBL on the luminous efficiency, reliability and carrier recombination mechanism of AlGaN-based DUV-LEDs with an emission wavelength of 273 nm are investigated. The experimental results show that the light output power (LOP), external quantum efficiency (EQE) and wall-plug efficiency (WPE) of the DUV-LEDs tend to first increase and then decrease with the period number of SL-EBL increasing, while the leakage current decreases and the reliability is enhanced. The maximum EQE and WPE of the DUV-LED are 3.5% and 3.2%, respectively, at an injection current of 7.5 mA when the period number of SL-EBL is fixed at 7 (the thickness is 28 nm). Meanwhile, the numerical simulation results show that the electron potential barrier height is enhanced with the period number of SL-EBL increasing, and the variation of the hole potential barrier height is negligible. Therefore, increasing the period number of SL-EBL is beneficial to shielding the dislocations and suppressing the leakage of electrons into the p-type layer, which improves the luminous efficiency and reliability of DUV-LEDs. However, when the period number of SL-EBL exceeds 7, the excessively thick hole potential barrier prevents the holes from entering into the activation region and reduces the radiative recombination efficiency. Therefore, EQE and WPE will show an inflection point with the variation of the period number of SL-EBL. In addition, to investigate the carrier recombination mechanism of the active region, the experimental EQE curves are fitted by the ABC model as well as the different slopes in logarithmic light output power-current (L-I ) curves are calculated after aging. It can be found that increasing the period number of SL-EBL can effectively suppress the non-radiative combination of carriers in the active region. This investigation can provide an alternative way to enhance the photoelectric performance of DUV-LEDs.

Keywords:

deep ultraviolet light emitting diodes /
electron barrier layer /
reliability /
external quantum efficiency

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2.
Epitop Optoelectronic Co., Ltd., Ma’anshan 243000, China
3.
Ma’anshan Jason Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Ma’anshan 243000, China

Corresponding author: Lv Quan-Jiang, lvquanjiang@ujs.edu.cn ; Liu Jun-Lin, liujunlin@ujs.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62374076, 62104085) and the Innovation/Entrepreneurship Program of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. JSSCTD202146).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	冯丽雅, 路慧敏, 朱一帆, 陈毅勇, 于彤军, 王建萍 2023 物理学报 72 048502 Google Scholar Feng L Y, Lu H M, Zhu Y F, Chen Y Y, Yu T J, Wang J P 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 048502 Google Scholar
[2]	Kneissl M, Seong T Y, Han J, Amano H 2019 Nat. Photonics 13 233 Google Scholar
[3]	Du P, Shi L, Liu S, Zhou S J 2022 Micro Nanostruct. 163 107150 Google Scholar
[4]	Hu H, Zhou S, Liu X T, Gao Y L, Gui C Q, Liu S 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 44627 Google Scholar
[5]	Sharif M N, Niass M I, Liou J J, Wang F, Liu Y 2021 Superlattice. Microstruct. 158 107022 Google Scholar
[6]	Nagasawa Y, Hirano A 2018 Appl. Sci. (Basel) 8 1264 Google Scholar
[7]	Zhang D Y, Chu C S, Tian K K, Kou J Q, Bi W G, Zhang Y H, Zhang Z H 2020 AIP Adv. 10 065032 Google Scholar
[8]	Lobo-Ploch N, Mehnke F, Sulmoni L, Cho H K, Guttmann M, Glaab J, Hilbrich K, Wernicke T, Einfeldt S, Kneissl M 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 117 111102 Google Scholar
[9]	Sun Y H, Xu F J, Xie N, Wang J M, Zhang N, Lang J, Liu B Y, Fang X Z, Wang L B, Ge W K, Kang X N, Qin Z X, Yang X L, Wang X Q, Shen B 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 212102 Google Scholar
[10]	Hu H P, Tang B, Wan H, Sun H D, Zhou S J, Dai J N, Chen C Q, Liu S, Guo L J 2020 Nano Energy 69 104427 Google Scholar
[11]	Meneghini M, La Grassa M, Vaccari S, Galler B, Zeisel R, Drechsel P, Hahn B, Meneghesso G, Zanoni E 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 113505 Google Scholar
[12]	Tian K K, Chu C S, Shao H, Che J M, Kou J Q, Fang M Q, Zhang Y H, Bi W G, Zhang Z H 2018 Superlattice. Microstruct. 122 280 Google Scholar
[13]	Sun J, Sun H Q, Yi X Y, Yang X, Liu T Y, Wang X, Zhang X, Fan X C, Zhang Z D, Guo Z Y 2017 Superlattice. Microstruct. 107 49 Google Scholar
[14]	Yu H B, Chen Q, Ren Z J, Tian M, Long S B, Dai J N, Chen C Q, Sun H D 2019 IEEE Photonics J. 11 1 Google Scholar
[15]	Cao Y W, Lv Q J, Yang T P, Mi T T, Wang X W, Liu W, Liu J L 2023 Micro Nanostruct. 175 207489 Google Scholar
[16]	So B, Kim J, Kwak T, Kim T, Lee J, Choi U, Nam O 2018 RSC Adv. 8 35528 Google Scholar
[17]	Zhao F Y, Wei J, Dong H L, Jia Z G, Li T B, Yu C Y, Zhang Z X, Xu B S 2022 Aip Adv. 12 125003 Google Scholar
[18]	Wang L Y, He W, Zheng T, Chen Z X, Zheng S W 2019 Superlattice. Microstruct. 133 106188 Google Scholar
[19]	Usman M, Jamil T, Malik S, Jamal H 2021 Optik 232 166528 Google Scholar
[20]	Cao Y W, Lv Q J, Yang T P, Mi T T, Wang X W, Liu W, Liu J L 2023 J. Lumin. 257 119699 Google Scholar
[21]	Kim K S, Han D P, Kim H S, Shim J I 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 091110 Google Scholar
[22]	Cao X A, Teetsov J M, D’evelyn M P, Merfeld D W, Yan C H 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 7 Google Scholar
[23]	王福学, 叶煊超 2017 发光学报 38 6 Google Scholar Wang F X, Ye X C 2017 Chin. J. Lumin. 38 6 Google Scholar
[24]	Schubert M F, Schubert E F 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 131102 Google Scholar
[25]	Lv Q J, Gao J D, Tao X X, Zhang J L, Mo C L, Wang X L, Zheng C D, Liu J L 2020 J. Lumin. 222 117186 Google Scholar
[26]	Grillot P N, Krames M R, Zhao H, Teoh S H 2006 IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Rel. 6 564 Google Scholar
[27]	毛清华, 江风益, 程海英, 郑畅达 2010 物理学报 59 8078 Google Scholar Mao Q H, Jiang F Y, Cheng H Y, Zheng C D 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 8078 Google Scholar
[28]	Dai Q, Shan Q F, Wang J, Chhajed S, Cho J, Schubert E F, Crawford M H, Koleske D D, Kim M H, Park Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 133507 Google Scholar
[29]	Yun J, Shim J I, Hirayama H 2015 Appl. Phys. Express 3 8 022104 Google Scholar
[30]	Cao X A, Stokes E B, Sandvik P M, Leboeuf S F, Kretchmer J, Walker D 2002 IEEE Electr. Device Lett. 23 535 Google Scholar
[31]	Lv Q J, Liu J L, Mo C L, Zhang J L, Wu X M, Wu Q F, Jiang F Y 2019 ACS Photonics 6 130 Google Scholar
[32]	Yamaguchi M, Yamamoto A, Tachikawa M, Itoh Y, Sugo M 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 2293 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 AlGaN基DUV-LEDs外延结构示意图(右)和四组不同的SL-EBL周期数(左)

Figure 1. Schematic of epitaxial structure for AlGaN-based DUV-LEDs (right) and the schematic of four different period numbers of SL-EBL (left).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 不同SL-EBL周期数样品的实验结果　(a)光输出功率以及外量子效率随电流的变化; (b)电光转换效率随电流的变化; (c) I-V曲线; (d)在100 mA注入电流下发光强度随峰值波长的变化

Figure 2. Experimental results for different samples: (a) LOP, EQE and (b) WPE as a function of current density; (c) experimentally measured I-V curves in logarithmic coordinates; (d) EL emission spectrums of DUV-LEDs at 100 mA.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 (a)—(d)不同老化时间下样品A, B, C和D的 EQE 随电流的变化; 具有不同SL-EBL周期数的样品A, B, C和D在老化过程中测得的在(e)小电流以及(f)工作电流下的归一化光输出功率, (f)中插图为样品A在不同老化时间下的归一化电致发光光谱

Figure 3. The EQE characteristic curves of samples (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, and (d) D after aging; (e) the normalized output power of (e) low injection current and (f) working current of samples A, B, C and D during aging period; the illustration in panel (f) shows the electroluminescence spectra of sample A under different stress time.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 电流密度为75 A/cm² 时模拟的不同周期数SL-EBL DUV-LEDs样品的能带示意图　(a) 样品A; (b) 样品B; (c) 样品C; (d) 样品D

Figure 4. Calculated band structure and the Femi energy level in EBL under current density of 75 A /cm² for sample (a) A, (b) B, (c) C and (d) D.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 (a)样品A和样品C的 EQE曲线与ABC模型的理论拟合, 其中实验数据用点表示, ABC模型拟合数据用实线表示; (b)样品A和样品C在老化前后双对数坐标L-I 曲线; (c)样品A和样品C在老化前后的S值

Figure 5. (a) Experimentally measured EQE vs. current density (solid dot) and theoretical ABC model (solid line) fits for sample A and C; (b) LOP and (c) slope (S ) as functions of current density for sample A and C.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	冯丽雅, 路慧敏, 朱一帆, 陈毅勇, 于彤军, 王建萍 2023 物理学报 72 048502 Google Scholar Feng L Y, Lu H M, Zhu Y F, Chen Y Y, Yu T J, Wang J P 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 048502 Google Scholar
[2]	Kneissl M, Seong T Y, Han J, Amano H 2019 Nat. Photonics 13 233 Google Scholar
[3]	Du P, Shi L, Liu S, Zhou S J 2022 Micro Nanostruct. 163 107150 Google Scholar
[4]	Hu H, Zhou S, Liu X T, Gao Y L, Gui C Q, Liu S 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 44627 Google Scholar
[5]	Sharif M N, Niass M I, Liou J J, Wang F, Liu Y 2021 Superlattice. Microstruct. 158 107022 Google Scholar
[6]	Nagasawa Y, Hirano A 2018 Appl. Sci. (Basel) 8 1264 Google Scholar
[7]	Zhang D Y, Chu C S, Tian K K, Kou J Q, Bi W G, Zhang Y H, Zhang Z H 2020 AIP Adv. 10 065032 Google Scholar
[8]	Lobo-Ploch N, Mehnke F, Sulmoni L, Cho H K, Guttmann M, Glaab J, Hilbrich K, Wernicke T, Einfeldt S, Kneissl M 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 117 111102 Google Scholar
[9]	Sun Y H, Xu F J, Xie N, Wang J M, Zhang N, Lang J, Liu B Y, Fang X Z, Wang L B, Ge W K, Kang X N, Qin Z X, Yang X L, Wang X Q, Shen B 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 212102 Google Scholar
[10]	Hu H P, Tang B, Wan H, Sun H D, Zhou S J, Dai J N, Chen C Q, Liu S, Guo L J 2020 Nano Energy 69 104427 Google Scholar
[11]	Meneghini M, La Grassa M, Vaccari S, Galler B, Zeisel R, Drechsel P, Hahn B, Meneghesso G, Zanoni E 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 113505 Google Scholar
[12]	Tian K K, Chu C S, Shao H, Che J M, Kou J Q, Fang M Q, Zhang Y H, Bi W G, Zhang Z H 2018 Superlattice. Microstruct. 122 280 Google Scholar
[13]	Sun J, Sun H Q, Yi X Y, Yang X, Liu T Y, Wang X, Zhang X, Fan X C, Zhang Z D, Guo Z Y 2017 Superlattice. Microstruct. 107 49 Google Scholar
[14]	Yu H B, Chen Q, Ren Z J, Tian M, Long S B, Dai J N, Chen C Q, Sun H D 2019 IEEE Photonics J. 11 1 Google Scholar
[15]	Cao Y W, Lv Q J, Yang T P, Mi T T, Wang X W, Liu W, Liu J L 2023 Micro Nanostruct. 175 207489 Google Scholar
[16]	So B, Kim J, Kwak T, Kim T, Lee J, Choi U, Nam O 2018 RSC Adv. 8 35528 Google Scholar
[17]	Zhao F Y, Wei J, Dong H L, Jia Z G, Li T B, Yu C Y, Zhang Z X, Xu B S 2022 Aip Adv. 12 125003 Google Scholar
[18]	Wang L Y, He W, Zheng T, Chen Z X, Zheng S W 2019 Superlattice. Microstruct. 133 106188 Google Scholar
[19]	Usman M, Jamil T, Malik S, Jamal H 2021 Optik 232 166528 Google Scholar
[20]	Cao Y W, Lv Q J, Yang T P, Mi T T, Wang X W, Liu W, Liu J L 2023 J. Lumin. 257 119699 Google Scholar
[21]	Kim K S, Han D P, Kim H S, Shim J I 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 091110 Google Scholar
[22]	Cao X A, Teetsov J M, D’evelyn M P, Merfeld D W, Yan C H 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 7 Google Scholar
[23]	王福学, 叶煊超 2017 发光学报 38 6 Google Scholar Wang F X, Ye X C 2017 Chin. J. Lumin. 38 6 Google Scholar
[24]	Schubert M F, Schubert E F 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 131102 Google Scholar
[25]	Lv Q J, Gao J D, Tao X X, Zhang J L, Mo C L, Wang X L, Zheng C D, Liu J L 2020 J. Lumin. 222 117186 Google Scholar
[26]	Grillot P N, Krames M R, Zhao H, Teoh S H 2006 IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Rel. 6 564 Google Scholar
[27]	毛清华, 江风益, 程海英, 郑畅达 2010 物理学报 59 8078 Google Scholar Mao Q H, Jiang F Y, Cheng H Y, Zheng C D 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 8078 Google Scholar
[28]	Dai Q, Shan Q F, Wang J, Chhajed S, Cho J, Schubert E F, Crawford M H, Koleske D D, Kim M H, Park Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 133507 Google Scholar
[29]	Yun J, Shim J I, Hirayama H 2015 Appl. Phys. Express 3 8 022104 Google Scholar
[30]	Cao X A, Stokes E B, Sandvik P M, Leboeuf S F, Kretchmer J, Walker D 2002 IEEE Electr. Device Lett. 23 535 Google Scholar
[31]	Lv Q J, Liu J L, Mo C L, Zhang J L, Wu X M, Wu Q F, Jiang F Y 2019 ACS Photonics 6 130 Google Scholar
[32]	Yamaguchi M, Yamamoto A, Tachikawa M, Itoh Y, Sugo M 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 2293 Google Scholar

[1]	Ren Xing, Yu Hong-Yu, Zhang Yong. Electroluminescence efficiency and stability of near ultraviolet organic light-emitting diodes based on BCPO luminous materials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(4): 047801. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231301
[2]	Wu Xiao-Xu, Long Jun-Hua, Sun Qiang-Jian, Wang Xia, Chen Zhi-Tao, Yu Meng-Lu, Luo Xiao-Long, Li Xue-Fei, Zhao Hu-Yin, Lu Shu-Long. Study of flexible packing and stability of GaInP/GaAs solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(13): 138803. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230352
[3]	Meng Jing, Gao Bo-Wen. Photovoltaic performance of novel Perovskite/organic integrated solar cells with high efficiency and high stability. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(1): 018802. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221120
[4]	Wang Run, Jia Ya-Lan, Zhang Yue, Ma Xing-Juan, Xu Qiang, Zhu Zhi-Xin, Deng Yan-Hong, Xiong Zu-Hong, Gao Chun-Hong. High efficiency green perovskite light-emitting diodes based on exciton blocking layer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(3): 038501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191263
[5]	Fu Min, Wen Shang-Sheng, Xia Yun-Yun, Xiang Chang-Ming, Ma Bing-Xu, Fang Fang. Failure analysis of GaN-based Light-emitting diode with hole vertical structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(4): 048501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.048501
[6]	Zhou Hang, Cui Jiang-Wei, Zheng Qi-Wen, Guo Qi, Ren Di-Yuan, Yu Xue-Feng. Reliability of partially-depleted silicon-on-insulator n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor under the ionizing radiation environment. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(8): 086101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.086101
[7]	Liu Bo-Zhi, Li Rui-Feng, Song Ling-Yun, Hu Lian, Zhang Bing-Po, Chen Yong-Yue, Wu Jian-Zhong, Bi Gang, Wang Miao, Wu Hui-Zhen. QD-LED devices using ZnSnO as an electron-transporting layer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(15): 158504. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.158504
[8]	Chen Jun, Fan Guang-Han, Zhang Yun-Yan. Investigation of spectral regulation in dual- wavelength light-emitting diodes by using the selective p-doped barriers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(8): 088502. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.088502
[9]	Song Wei-Cai, Zhang Yong-Jin. Reliability of multi-state and multi-subsystem below stress-strength interference. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(2): 021201. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.021201
[10]	Yang Yang, Chen Shu-Fen, Xie Jun, Chen Chun-Yan, Shao Ming, Guo Xu, Huang Wei. Comprehensive Survey for the Frontier Disciplines. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(4): 047809. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.047809
[11]	Ma Feng-Ying, Su Jian-Po, Guo Mao-Tian, Chi Quan, Chen Ming, Yu Zhen-Fang. External quantum efficiency of microcavity planar emitting devices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(6): 064203. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.064203
[12]	Wang Bing, Li Zhi-Cong, Yao Ran, Liang Meng, Yan Fa-Wang, Wang Guo-Hong. Optimized growth of p-type AlGaN electron blocking layer in the GaN-based LED. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(1): 016108. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.016108
[13]	Zhou Wen, Liu Hong-Xia. Quantitative analysis on median-time-to-fail of copper interconnect with lose object defects. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(11): 7716-7721. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7716
[14]	Zhang Yong-Jin, Wang Zhong-Zhi. Cumulative damage model and parameter estimate about a kind of time-sharing redundant system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(9): 6074-6079. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6074
[15]	Lin Han, Liu Shou, Zhang Xiang-Su, Liu Bao-Lin, Ren Xue-Chang. Enhanced external quantum efficiency of light emitting diodes by fabricating two-dimensional photonic crystal sapphire substrate with holographic technique. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(2): 959-963. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.959
[16]	Wang Jun, Wang Lei, Dong Ye-Min, Zou Xin, Shao Li, Li Wen-Jun, Steve Yang. Mechanism and impact of the double-hump substrate current in high-voltage double diffused drain MOS transistors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(7): 4492-4496. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4492
[17]	Xie Guo-Feng, He Xu-Hong, Tong Jie-Juan, Zheng Yan-Hua. Calculating physical failure probability of HTR-10’s residual heat removal system by response surface method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(6): 3192-3197. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3192
[18]	Hu Jin, Du Lei, Zhuang Yi-Qi, Bao Jun-Lin, Zhou Jiang. Noise as a representation for reliability of light emitting diode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(3): 1384-1389. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1384
[19]	Zhao Yi, Wan Xing-Gong. Substrate and process dependence of gate oxide reliability of 0.18μm dual gate CMOS process. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(6): 3003-3006. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3003
[20]	Liu Hong-Xia, Zheng Xue-Feng, Hao Yue. Generation mechanism of stress induced leakage current in flash memory cell. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(12): 5867-5871. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5867

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 12 - 2024-06-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 1825
PDF Downloads: 51
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板