-
Deep ultraviolet (DUV) picosecond lasers, operating in a 200–280 nm wavelength range, possess significant advantages, such as high photon energy and high resolution. These attributes make them highly promising for applications like semiconductor detection, ensuring the production of high-quality, defect-free semiconductor devices, as well as for advanced scientific research and industrial processing. High-power DUV picosecond lasers are typically generated via nonlinear frequency conversion of infrared lasers based on master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) configurations. Among various DUV laser technologies, systems based on β-BBO crystals are particularly valuable due to their simple design and cost-effectiveness. However, the linear two-photon absorption, as well as the formation of dynamic color centers in BBO, are significant limitations for high-power, high-repetition-rate UV radiation, leading to thermal effects. Hence, it is important to carefully study the performance characteristics of BBO for high-power, high-repetition-rate pulse generation in the UV at 266 nm. This study presents a high-power, all-solid-state DUV picosecond laser developed using a 1064 nm Nd:YVO4 MOPA amplification architecture. In this experimental setup, a 50 mW, 7.8 ps, 20 MHz all-fiber SESAM mode-locked laser is used as a seed source, achieving 140 W in amplified output power 8.33 ps in pulse duration at 1064 nm via MOPA. In the nonlinear frequency conversion process, the amplified laser pulses are initially focused onto an LBO crystal for secondary harmonic generation (SHG). Precise temperature control of the LBO crystal can generate a 532 nm output with 73 W in power and 6.93 ps in pulse duration, while achieving 52.64% in conversion efficiency. Two-photon absorption is a key factor limiting the further enhancement of deep ultraviolet (DUV) laser power. By investigating the transmittance and temperature rise of a high-power dual-wavelength laser in a β-BBO crystal, the results indicate that strong two-photon absorption occurs under high-power DUV irradiation. This absorption induces significant thermal effects, resulting in a temperature gradient within the crystal and leading to phase mismatch, which severely affects frequency conversion efficiency and output stability. To solve this problem and further increase the DUV output power, a large-spot pumping scheme (spot size: 1.5 mm × 1 mm) is adopted in this work. Under a pump peak power density of less than 1.11 GW/cm2, the thermal gradient caused by two-photon absorption is effectively suppressed, achieving maximum fourth-harmonic output power of 11 W. The corresponding single-pulse energy reaches 13.75 μJ. The root mean square (RMS) jitter, measured in an 8-hour period, is less than 0.96%. This all-solid-state DUV laser demonstrates excellent performance characteristics, including high average power, stability, resolution, and peak power, making it a strong candidate for applications requiring efficient and high-precision processing or detection. By further increasing the pump power and optimizing the temperature control system, the output power of the laser can be significantly enhanced, thereby broadening its applicability and competitiveness in high-end fields such as semiconductor manufacturing, advanced research, and industrial processing. -
Keywords:
- deep ultraviolet /
- picosecond laser /
- β-BBO /
- fourth-harmonic generation
-
图 1 全固态深紫外皮秒激光器实验装置图. AOM, 声光调制器; Pre-Amp, 光纤预放大模块; HWP, 半波片; PBS, 偏振分光棱镜; TFP, 薄膜偏振片; DM, 双色镜
Figure 1. All-solid-state DUV picosecond lasers experimental setup. AOM, acoustic optical modulator; Pre-Amp, fiber pre-amplification module; HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarizing beam splitter prisms; TFP, thin-film polarizer; DM, dichroic mirror.
-
[1] Liu K, Li H, Qu S Z, Liang H K, Wang Q J, Zhang Y 2020 Opt. Express 28 18360
Google Scholar
[2] Wen N, Zhang S J, Zong N, Gao H W, Bo Y, Peng Q J, Cui D F, Xu Zu Y 2022 Optica Advanced Photonics Congress 2022, Maastricht, Limburg Netherlands, July 24-28, 2022 NpTu 1G 6
[3] Mutailipu M, Pan S 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 20302
Google Scholar
[4] Zhu J L, Liu J M, Xu T L, Yuan S, Zhang Z X, Jiang H, Gu H G, Zhou R J, Liu S Y 2022 Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 4 032001
Google Scholar
[5] Meshulach D, Dolev I, Yamazaki Y, Tsuchiya K, Kaneko M, Yoshino K, Fujii T 2010 Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIV. SPIE San Jose, California, United States, February 21-25 7638 76380K
[6] Allaria E, Castronovo D, Cinquegrana P, Craievich P, Dal Forno Massimo, Danailov M B, D'Auria G, Demidovich A, De Ninno G, Di Mitri S, Diviacco B, Fawley WM, Ferianis M, Ferrari E, Froehlich L, Gaio G, Gauthier D, Giannessi L, Ivanov R, Mahieu B, Mahne N, Nikolov I, Parmigiani F, Penco G, Raimondi L, Scafuri C, Serpico C, Sigalotti P, Spampinati S, Spezzani C, Svandrlik C. Svetina M, Trovo M, Veronese M, Zangrando D, Zangrando M 2013 Nat. Photonics 7 913
Google Scholar
[7] Cinquegrana P, Demidovich A, Kurdi G, Nikolov I, Sigalotti P, Susnjar P, Danailov M B 2021 High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 9 e61
Google Scholar
[8] Tanaka S, Arakawa M, Fuchimuka A, Sasaki Y, Onose T, Kamba Y, Igarashi H, Qu C, Tamiya M, Oizumi H, Ito S, Kakizaki K, Xuan H W, Zhao Z G, Kobayashi Y, Mizoguchi H 2016 Solid State Lasers XXV: Technology and Devices. SPIE San Francisco, California, United States February 13-18 9726 424
[9] Fujimoto J, Kobayashi M, Kakizaki K, Oizumi H, Mimura T, Matsunaga T, Mizoguchi H 2017 High-Power Laser Materials Processing: Applications, Diagnostics, and Systems VI. SPIE San Francisco, California, United States January28-February 2 10097 234
[10] Cui Z J, Sun M Y, Liu De’an, Zhu, J Q 2022 Opt. Express 30 43354
Google Scholar
[11] Liu Q, Yan X P, Fu X, Gong M, Wang D S 2008 Laser Phys. Lett. 6 203
[12] 王子文, 曹雪辰, 张艳林, 程东林, 靳丕铦, 卢华东 2024 中国激光 51 1401003
Google Scholar
Wang Z W, Cao X C, Zhang Y L, Cheng D L, Jin P X, Lu H D 2024 Chin. J. Lasers 51 1401003
Google Scholar
[13] 何京良, 卢兴强, 贾玉磊, 满宝元, 祝世宁, 朱永元 2000 物理学报 49 2106
Google Scholar
He J L, Lu X Q, Jia Y L, Man B Y, Zhu S N, Zhu Y Y 2000 Acta Phys. Sin. 49 2106
Google Scholar
[14] Wang N, Zhang J Y, Yu H J, Lin X C, Yang G W 2022 Opt. Express 30 5700
Google Scholar
[15] 陈国柱, 沈咏, 刘曲, 邹宏新 2014 物理学报 63 054204
Google Scholar
Chen G Z, Shen Y, Liu Q, Zou H X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 054204
Google Scholar
[16] 郑佳琪, 丛振华, 刘兆军, 王上, 赵智刚 2021 中国激光 48 1201008
Google Scholar
Zheng J Q, Cong Z H, Liu Z J, Wang S, Zhao Z G 2021 Chin. J. Lasers 48 1201008
Google Scholar
[17] Orii Y, Kohno K, Tanaka H, Yoshimura M, Mori Y, Nishimae J, Shibuya K 2022 Opt. Express 30 11797
Google Scholar
[18] Orii Y, Yoshii K, Kohno K, Tanaka H, Shibuya K, Okada G, Mori Y, Nishimae J, Yoshimura M 2023 Opt. Express 31 14705
Google Scholar
[19] 俞航航, 张志韬, 玄洪文 2024 中国激光 51 0701020
Google Scholar
Yu H H, Zhang Z T, Xuan H W 2024 Chin. J. Lasers 51 0701020
Google Scholar
[20] Willenberg B, Brunner F, Phillips C R, Keller U 2020 Optica 7 485
Google Scholar
[21] Kumar S C, Casals J C, Wei J X, Ebrahim-Zadeh M 2015 Opt. Express 23 28091
Google Scholar
[22] Takahashi M, Osada A, Dergachev A, Moulton P F, Cadatal-Raduban M, Shimizu T, Sarukura N 2011 J. Cryst. Growth 318 606
Google Scholar
[23] R Bhandari, T Taira, A Miyamoto, Y Furukawa, T Tago 2012 Opt. Mater. Express 2 907
Google Scholar
Metrics
- Abstract views: 426
- PDF Downloads: 26
- Cited By: 0