-
采用CTU + CT (corner transport upwind + constrained transport)算法对磁流体动力学方程组进行求解, 分别对有无磁场控制条件下开尔文-赫姆霍兹(Kelvin-Helmholtz, KH)不稳定性的演化过程进行数值模拟. 数值结果分析了磁场(
$ {M_{\rm{A}}} = 3.33$ )对混合层流场涡量和压力演化的影响, 并与经典流体力学情况进行对比; 另外, 还从磁压力和磁张力分布情况对磁场抑制KH不稳定性的机理进行分析. 结果表明, 外加磁场对混合层结构的演变产生很大的影响, 其中, 磁压力使涡量在界面处沉积, 而磁张力能够产生一个与涡旋转方向相反的力矩, 从而对大涡结构起到拉伸破坏作用, 最终抑制了涡的卷起. 此外, 当流动发展到一定阶段, 在磁压力、磁张力以及压力场的共同作用下, 界面在曲率最大位置处会发生分离, 最终形成“鱼钩”状涡结构.-
关键词:
- Kelvin-Helmholtz不稳定性 /
- 磁压力 /
- 磁张力 /
- 磁流体
The evolution of the Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instability in the presence of classical hydrodynamics and magneto-hydro-dynamics is investigated numerically by using the magneto-hydro-dynamic (MHD) equations. The MHD equations are solved with the corner transport upwind plus constrained transport algorithm that guarantees the divergence-free constraint in the magnetic field. The numerical results are used to analyze the effects of magnetic field (${M_{\rm{A}}} = 3.33$ ) on the vorticity and pressure evolution of mixing layer, and also compared with those in the hydrodynamics situation. Moreover, the mechanism of weakening the effect of magnetic field on the KH instability is revealed from the perspectives of the magnetic pressure and the magnetic tension. The results show that the external magnetic field has a great influence on the flow structure of the mixing layer. Specifically, the magnetic pressure has a major effect in the vorticity deposition on the interface, whereas the magnetic tension generates a torque to counter the scrolling of vortex. As a result, the large vortex structure is stretched and destroyed, and finally restrains the vortex rolling-up. In addition, with the development of mixing layer, the interface will separate at the points of maximum curvature under the joint effect of the magnetic pressure, the magnetic tension and the pressure field, and finally form a fishhook-like vortex structure.-
Keywords:
- Kelvin-Helmholtz instability /
- magnetic pressure /
- magnetic tension /
- magnetic fluid
[1] Rahmani M, Seymour B, Lawrence G 2014 Environ. Fluid Mech. 14 1275Google Scholar
[2] Ryutova M, Berger T, Frank Z, Tarbell T, Title A 2010 Sol. Phys. 267 75Google Scholar
[3] Zhelyazkov I, Zaqarashvili T V, Ofman L, Chandra R 2018 Adv. Space Res. 61 628Google Scholar
[4] Ismayilli R F, Dzhalilov N S, Shergelashvili B M, Poedts S, Pirguliyev M S 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 062903Google Scholar
[5] Zhelyazkov I, Chandra R, Srivastava A K, Mishonov T 2015 Astrophys. Space Sci. 356 231Google Scholar
[6] Wu C C 1986 J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 91 3042Google Scholar
[7] Hasegawa H, Fujimoto M, Takagi K, Saito Y, Mukai T, Rème H 2006 J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 111 1Google Scholar
[8] Leroy M H J, Keppens R 2016 Meeting of the French Society of Astronomy & Astrophysics Lyon, France, June 14–17, 2016 p107
[9] Ho C M, Huerre P 1984 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16 365Google Scholar
[10] Gratton F T, Gnavi G, Farrugia C J, Bender L 2004 Braz. J. Phys. 34 1804Google Scholar
[11] Zhao K G, Wang L F, Ye W H, Wu J F, Li Y J 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 030401Google Scholar
[12] Leep L J, Button J C, Burr R F 1993 AIAA J. 31 2039Google Scholar
[13] Brüggen M, Hillebrandt W 2001 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 323 56Google Scholar
[14] Keppens R, Toth G, Westermann R H J, Goedbloed J P 1999 J. Plasma Phys. 61 1Google Scholar
[15] Sharma R C, Srivastava K M 1970 Can. J. Phys. 48 2083Google Scholar
[16] Sharma R C, Srivastava K M 1968 Aust. J. Phys. 21 917Google Scholar
[17] Jeong H, Ryu D, Jones T W, Frank A 2000 Astrophys. J. 529 536Google Scholar
[18] Tian C L, Chen Y 2016 Astrophys. J. 824 60Google Scholar
[19] Liu Y, Chen Z H, Zhang H H, Lin Z Y 2018 Phys. Fluids 30 044102Google Scholar
[20] Praturi D S, Girimaji S S 2019 Phys. Fluids 31 024108Google Scholar
[21] Lin Z Y, Zhang H H, Chen Z H, Liu Y, Hong Y 2017 Int. J. Comut. Fluid Dyn. 31 21Google Scholar
[22] 林震亚, 张焕好, 陈志华, 刘迎 2017 爆炸与冲击 37 748Google Scholar
Lin Z Y, Zhang H H, Chen Z H, Liu Y 2017 Explosion and Shock Waves 37 748Google Scholar
[23] Bogdanoff D W 1983 AIAA J. 21 926Google Scholar
[24] 董国丹, 郭则庆, 秦建华, 张焕好, 姜孝海, 陈志华, 沙莎 2019 物理学报 68 165201Google Scholar
Dong G D, Guo Z Q, Qin J H, Zhang H H, Jiang X H, Chen Z H, Sha S 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 165201Google Scholar
[25] 沙莎, 张焕好, 陈志华, 郑纯, 吴威涛, 石启陈 2020 物理学报 69 184701Google Scholar
Sha S, Zhang H H, Chen Z H, Chun C, Wu W T, Shi Q C 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 184701Google Scholar
[26] Karimi M, Girimaji S S 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 041102Google Scholar
[27] Karimabadi H, Roytershteyn V, Wan M, Matthaeus W H, Daughton W, Wu P, Shay M, Loring B, Borovsky J, Leonardis E 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 763Google Scholar
[28] Patnaik P C, Sherman F S, Corcos G M 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 73 215Google Scholar
-
图 4 经典流体(HD)混合层失稳过程的涡量分布 (a)
$\tau = 30$ ; (b)$\tau = 51$ ; (c)$\tau = 73$ ; (d)$\tau = 119$ ; (e)$\tau = 141$ ; (f)$\tau = 276$ Fig. 4. Vorticity distribution during the instability process of the classical fluid mixing layer: (a)
$\tau = 30$ ; (b)$\tau = 51$ ; (c)$\tau = 73$ ; (d)$\tau = 119$ ; (e)$\tau = 141$ ; (f)$\tau = 276$ .图 5 经典流体(HD)混合层失稳过程的压力分布 (a)
$\tau = 30$ ; (b)$\tau = 51$ ; (c)$\tau = 73$ ; (d)$\tau = 119$ ; (e)$\tau = 141$ ; (f)$\tau = 276$ Fig. 5. Pressure distribution during the instability process of the classical fluid mixing layer: (a)
$\tau = 30$ ; (b)$\tau = 51$ ; (c)$\tau = 73$ ; (d)$\tau = 119$ ; (e)$\tau = 141$ ; (f)$\tau = 276$ . -
[1] Rahmani M, Seymour B, Lawrence G 2014 Environ. Fluid Mech. 14 1275Google Scholar
[2] Ryutova M, Berger T, Frank Z, Tarbell T, Title A 2010 Sol. Phys. 267 75Google Scholar
[3] Zhelyazkov I, Zaqarashvili T V, Ofman L, Chandra R 2018 Adv. Space Res. 61 628Google Scholar
[4] Ismayilli R F, Dzhalilov N S, Shergelashvili B M, Poedts S, Pirguliyev M S 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 062903Google Scholar
[5] Zhelyazkov I, Chandra R, Srivastava A K, Mishonov T 2015 Astrophys. Space Sci. 356 231Google Scholar
[6] Wu C C 1986 J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 91 3042Google Scholar
[7] Hasegawa H, Fujimoto M, Takagi K, Saito Y, Mukai T, Rème H 2006 J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 111 1Google Scholar
[8] Leroy M H J, Keppens R 2016 Meeting of the French Society of Astronomy & Astrophysics Lyon, France, June 14–17, 2016 p107
[9] Ho C M, Huerre P 1984 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16 365Google Scholar
[10] Gratton F T, Gnavi G, Farrugia C J, Bender L 2004 Braz. J. Phys. 34 1804Google Scholar
[11] Zhao K G, Wang L F, Ye W H, Wu J F, Li Y J 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 030401Google Scholar
[12] Leep L J, Button J C, Burr R F 1993 AIAA J. 31 2039Google Scholar
[13] Brüggen M, Hillebrandt W 2001 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 323 56Google Scholar
[14] Keppens R, Toth G, Westermann R H J, Goedbloed J P 1999 J. Plasma Phys. 61 1Google Scholar
[15] Sharma R C, Srivastava K M 1970 Can. J. Phys. 48 2083Google Scholar
[16] Sharma R C, Srivastava K M 1968 Aust. J. Phys. 21 917Google Scholar
[17] Jeong H, Ryu D, Jones T W, Frank A 2000 Astrophys. J. 529 536Google Scholar
[18] Tian C L, Chen Y 2016 Astrophys. J. 824 60Google Scholar
[19] Liu Y, Chen Z H, Zhang H H, Lin Z Y 2018 Phys. Fluids 30 044102Google Scholar
[20] Praturi D S, Girimaji S S 2019 Phys. Fluids 31 024108Google Scholar
[21] Lin Z Y, Zhang H H, Chen Z H, Liu Y, Hong Y 2017 Int. J. Comut. Fluid Dyn. 31 21Google Scholar
[22] 林震亚, 张焕好, 陈志华, 刘迎 2017 爆炸与冲击 37 748Google Scholar
Lin Z Y, Zhang H H, Chen Z H, Liu Y 2017 Explosion and Shock Waves 37 748Google Scholar
[23] Bogdanoff D W 1983 AIAA J. 21 926Google Scholar
[24] 董国丹, 郭则庆, 秦建华, 张焕好, 姜孝海, 陈志华, 沙莎 2019 物理学报 68 165201Google Scholar
Dong G D, Guo Z Q, Qin J H, Zhang H H, Jiang X H, Chen Z H, Sha S 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 165201Google Scholar
[25] 沙莎, 张焕好, 陈志华, 郑纯, 吴威涛, 石启陈 2020 物理学报 69 184701Google Scholar
Sha S, Zhang H H, Chen Z H, Chun C, Wu W T, Shi Q C 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 184701Google Scholar
[26] Karimi M, Girimaji S S 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 041102Google Scholar
[27] Karimabadi H, Roytershteyn V, Wan M, Matthaeus W H, Daughton W, Wu P, Shay M, Loring B, Borovsky J, Leonardis E 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 763Google Scholar
[28] Patnaik P C, Sherman F S, Corcos G M 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 73 215Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 5182
- PDF下载量: 93
- 被引次数: 0