搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

时间延迟对细胞周期动力学的影响

赵新军 李九智 蒋中英

引用本文:
Citation:

时间延迟对细胞周期动力学的影响

赵新军, 李九智, 蒋中英

Influence of time delay on dynamics of cell cycle

Zhao Xin-Jun, Li Jiu-Zhi, Jiang Zhong-Ying
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 基于Hill动力学与Michaelis-Menten方程, 建立理论模型研究CDK1(细胞周期蛋白依赖性蛋白激酶)/APC(后期促进复合物) 系统振荡过程中, 时间延迟对系统振荡动力学的影响. 理论模型考虑CDK1-Plk1 (Polo样蛋白质激酶)-APC通路中的时间延迟效应, 研究发现, 在不同时间延迟条件下, CDK1, Plk1和APC随时间演化呈现了周期性振荡特性, 表明了细胞周期进程. 随着时间延迟的增加, CDK1, Plk1和APC随时间演化的振荡周期变长、振幅增大, 表明了时间延迟会改变体系的动力学特性. 通过考察在高斯白噪声环境中的时间延迟效应, 研究发现, 噪声扰动明显地改变了CDK1随时间演化的动力学特性. 在较小噪声环境中, CDK1/APC系统通过自调节时间延迟, 改变振幅或振荡周期, 重新自调控, 使系统恢复稳定的周期性振荡. 在较大噪声环境中, CDK1呈现了阻尼振荡模式. 由此表明了较强的噪声, 会使得CDK1/APC系统周期性振荡动力学出现较大改变, 由于时间延迟, CDK1/APC振荡系统表现为从原有的周期性振荡转变为阻尼振荡, 系统原有的振荡模式很难再恢复. 理论结果进一步揭示了诸如非洲爪蟾胚胎等细胞周期过程中的时间延迟效应, 可为设计调控细胞周期、阻断肿瘤转变的通路治疗方案提供理论依据.
    In this work, based on the Hill dynamics and Michaelis-Menten equation, a theoretical model is built to study the influence of time delay on the oscillation dynamics of a cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1)/ anaphase-promoting complex (APC) system. The theoretical model considers the time delay in the CDK1- polo-like protein kinase (P1K1)-APC pathway. We find that under different time delay conditions, the CDK1, Plk1 and APC exhibit periodic oscillation characteristics over time, indicating cell cycle progression. With the increase of time delay, the oscillation periods and amplitudes of CDK1, Plk1 and APC increase, which indicates that the time delay will change the dynamic characteristics of the system. It implies that during the cell cycle, the status of the CDK1/APC oscillation system will show a long-term correlation with the biochemical reaction time of each component, such as CDK1, Plk1 and APC. This correlation is influenced by its past, and there is a time-delay effect. The additional correction will be made due to time delay. By investigating the time-delay effect in Gaussian white noise environment, we find that in the Gaussian white noise environment, the noise disturbance obviously changes the dynamic characteristics of CDK1 evolution with time. In a low-noise environment, the CDK1/APC system changes the oscillation amplitude or period through self-adjusting time delay, so that the system can restore the stable periodic oscillation, while in a high noise environment, CDK1 exhibits a damped oscillation, indicating that the periodic oscillation dynamics of the CDK1/APC system will be significantly changed by strong noise. In the CDK1/APC system oscillation process, the system adjusts the physiological response through a feedback mechanism. There is a time delay between the perception of the noise effect and the establishment of an appropriate physiological response. By different time delays, the system can adjust complex non-periodic chaotic rhythms with different time delays, and recover to produce a stable periodic physiological process. Owing to the time delay, the CDK1/APC oscillation system changes from the original stable oscillation to a damped oscillation, but the original oscillation mode is difficult to recover. The theoretical results further reveal the time-delay effect in cell cycle processes such as Xenopus embryos, and provide a theoretical basis for designing pathway treatment plans that regulate cell cycle and block tumor transformation.
      通信作者: 蒋中英, jiangzhying@163.com
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 21764015)、伊犁师范大学博士科研启动基金(批准号: 2020YSBS008)和新疆自然科学基金联合基金(批准号: 2019D01C333)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Jiang Zhong-Ying, jiangzhying@163.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21764015), the Yi Li Normal University Doctoral Research Startup Foundation, China (Grant No. 2020YSBS008), and the Joint Funds of Xinjiang Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. 2019D01C333)
    [1]

    Hartwell L H, Weinert T A 1989 Science 246 629Google Scholar

    [2]

    Murray A W, Kirschner M W 1989 Nature 339 275Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ben-Sahra I, Howell J J, Asara J M, Manning B D 2013 Science 339 1323Google Scholar

    [4]

    Loh X Y, Sun Q Y, Ding L W, Mayakonda A, Venkatachalam N, Yeo M S, Silva T C, Xiao J F, Doan N B, Said J W, Ran X B, Zhou S Q, Dakle P, Shyamsunder P, Koh A P F, Huang R Y J, Berman B, Tan S Y, Yang H, Lin D C, Koeffler H P 2019 Cancer Res. 80 219

    [5]

    Goldbeter A 2002 Nature 420 238Google Scholar

    [6]

    Chen K C, Calzone L, Csikasz-Nagy A, Cross F R, Novak B, Tyson J J 2004 Mol. Biol. Cell 15 3841Google Scholar

    [7]

    Pines J 2011 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12 427

    [8]

    Kim S Y, Song E J, Lee K J, Ferrell J E 2005 Mol. Cell Biol. 25 10580Google Scholar

    [9]

    Murray A W, Kirschner M W 1989 Science 246 614Google Scholar

    [10]

    Sha W, Moore J, Chen K, Lassaletta A D, Yi C S, Tyson J J, Sible J C 2003 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 975Google Scholar

    [11]

    Dasso M, Newport J W 1990 Cell 61 811Google Scholar

    [12]

    Minshull J, Sun H, Tonks N K, Murray A W 1994 Cell 79 475Google Scholar

    [13]

    Hara K, Tydeman P, Kirschner M 1980 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 462Google Scholar

    [14]

    King R W, Peters J M, Tugendreich S, Rolfe M, Hieter P, Kirschner M W 1995 Cell 81 279Google Scholar

    [15]

    Gao Z F, Shan H, Wang H 2021 Astron Nachr. 342 369Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yang Q, Jr J E F 2013 Nat. Cell Biol. 15 518

    [17]

    Doedel E J 1981 Cong. Numer. 30 265

    [18]

    Novak B, Tyson J J 1993 J. Theor. Biol. 165 101Google Scholar

    [19]

    Novak B, Tyson J J 1993 J. Cell Sci. 106 1153Google Scholar

    [20]

    Srividhya J, Gopinathan M S 2006 J. Theor. Biol. 241 617Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ferrell Jr J E, Tsai T Y C, Yang Q 2011 Cell 144 18874

    [22]

    Bae H, Go Y H, Kwon T, Sung B J, Cha H Jin 2019 Pharm. Res. 36 1Google Scholar

    [23]

    Seki A, Coppinger J A, Jang C Y, Yates J R, Fang G W 2008 Science 320 1655Google Scholar

    [24]

    Glass L, Beuter A, Larocque D 1988 Math. Biosci. 90 111Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang C, Du L P, WangT H, Yang T, Zeng C H, Wang C J 2017 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 96 120

    [26]

    Karamched B R, Bressloff P C 2015 Biophys. J. 108 2408Google Scholar

    [27]

    Steuer R 2004 J. Theor. Biol. 228 293Google Scholar

    [28]

    Kyrychko Y N and Schwartz I B 2018 Chaos 28 063106Google Scholar

    [29]

    McAdams H H, Arkin A 1999 Trends Gene. 15 65Google Scholar

    [30]

    Vilar J M G, Kueh H Y, Barkai N, Leibler S 2002 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 5988Google Scholar

    [31]

    Morrison J F, Walsh C T 1988 Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas. Mol. Biol. 61 201

    [32]

    Roskoski R, Ritchie P A 2001 Biochemistry 40 9329Google Scholar

    [33]

    Vodermaier H C 2004 Curr. Biol. 14 R787Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zitouni S, Nabais C, Jana S C, Guerrero A, Bettencourt-Dias M 2014 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15 433Google Scholar

    [35]

    Glass D S, Jin X F, Riedel-Kruse I H 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 1Google Scholar

    [36]

    Huang B, Tian X Y, Liu F, Wang W 2016 Phys. Rev. E 94 052413Google Scholar

    [37]

    Ott W 2008 Comm. Math. Phys. 281 775Google Scholar

    [38]

    Pomerening J R, Kim S Y, Ferrell J E 2005 Cell 122 565Google Scholar

    [39]

    Lin K K, Young L S 2008 Nonlinearity 21 899Google Scholar

    [40]

    Kuznetsov A P, Turukina L V, Mosekilde E 2001 Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 11 1065Google Scholar

  • 图 1  CDK1-Plk1-APC信号通路模型示意图.

    Fig. 1.  Schematic depiction of the model on CDK1-Plk1-APC pathway.

    图 2  不同时间延迟条件下, $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $, $ [{\text{Plk1}}] $$ [{\text{APC}}] $随时间的演化.

    Fig. 2.  Temporal evolutions of the levels of $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $, $ [{\text{Pik1}}] $ and $ [{\text{APC}}] $ at different time delays.

    图 3  不同$ {\tau _{\text{C}}} $条件下, $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $$ [{\text{APC}}] $对应的相图.

    Fig. 3.  Phase plots of $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $ vs. $ [{\text{APC}}] $ at different $ {\tau _{\text{C}}} $.

    图 4  不同$ {\tau _{\text{A}}} $条件下, $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $$ [{\text{APC}}] $对应的相图, 以及$ {\tau _{\text{A}}} = 2.0 $时, $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $$ [{\text{APC}}] $随时间的演化

    Fig. 4.  Phase plots of $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $ vs $ [{\text{APC}}] $ different $ {\tau _{\text{A}}} $, and temporal evolutions of the levels of $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $ and $ [{\text{APC}}] $ for $ {\tau _{\text{A}}} = 2.0 $.

    图 5  噪声幅D = 0.01和D = 0.05时, $ [{\rm{CDK1}}]$随时间的演化, 以及与$ [{\rm{APC}}]$相对应的相图

    Fig. 5.  Temporal evolutions of the levels of $ [{\rm{CDK1}}]$, and phase plots of $ [{\rm{CDK1}}]$ vs. $ [{\rm{APC}}]$ for D = 0.01 and D = 0.05.

    图 6  不同时间延迟条件下, 噪声幅为D = 0.01和D = 0.05时, $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $随时间的演化, 以及与$ [{\text{APC}}] $相对应的相图

    Fig. 6.  Temporal evolutions of the levels of $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $, and phase plots of $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $ vs. $ [{\text{APC}}] $ for D = 0.01 and D = 0.05 at different time delays.

    图 7  不同时间延迟、噪声幅条件下, $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $, $ [{\text{Plk1}}] $, $ [{\text{APC}}] $的功率谱密度(PSD)

    Fig. 7.  power spectral density of $ [{\text{CDK1}}] $, $ [{\text{Plk1}}] $ and $ [{\text{APC}}] $at different time delays and noise amplitudes.

  • [1]

    Hartwell L H, Weinert T A 1989 Science 246 629Google Scholar

    [2]

    Murray A W, Kirschner M W 1989 Nature 339 275Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ben-Sahra I, Howell J J, Asara J M, Manning B D 2013 Science 339 1323Google Scholar

    [4]

    Loh X Y, Sun Q Y, Ding L W, Mayakonda A, Venkatachalam N, Yeo M S, Silva T C, Xiao J F, Doan N B, Said J W, Ran X B, Zhou S Q, Dakle P, Shyamsunder P, Koh A P F, Huang R Y J, Berman B, Tan S Y, Yang H, Lin D C, Koeffler H P 2019 Cancer Res. 80 219

    [5]

    Goldbeter A 2002 Nature 420 238Google Scholar

    [6]

    Chen K C, Calzone L, Csikasz-Nagy A, Cross F R, Novak B, Tyson J J 2004 Mol. Biol. Cell 15 3841Google Scholar

    [7]

    Pines J 2011 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12 427

    [8]

    Kim S Y, Song E J, Lee K J, Ferrell J E 2005 Mol. Cell Biol. 25 10580Google Scholar

    [9]

    Murray A W, Kirschner M W 1989 Science 246 614Google Scholar

    [10]

    Sha W, Moore J, Chen K, Lassaletta A D, Yi C S, Tyson J J, Sible J C 2003 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 975Google Scholar

    [11]

    Dasso M, Newport J W 1990 Cell 61 811Google Scholar

    [12]

    Minshull J, Sun H, Tonks N K, Murray A W 1994 Cell 79 475Google Scholar

    [13]

    Hara K, Tydeman P, Kirschner M 1980 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 462Google Scholar

    [14]

    King R W, Peters J M, Tugendreich S, Rolfe M, Hieter P, Kirschner M W 1995 Cell 81 279Google Scholar

    [15]

    Gao Z F, Shan H, Wang H 2021 Astron Nachr. 342 369Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yang Q, Jr J E F 2013 Nat. Cell Biol. 15 518

    [17]

    Doedel E J 1981 Cong. Numer. 30 265

    [18]

    Novak B, Tyson J J 1993 J. Theor. Biol. 165 101Google Scholar

    [19]

    Novak B, Tyson J J 1993 J. Cell Sci. 106 1153Google Scholar

    [20]

    Srividhya J, Gopinathan M S 2006 J. Theor. Biol. 241 617Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ferrell Jr J E, Tsai T Y C, Yang Q 2011 Cell 144 18874

    [22]

    Bae H, Go Y H, Kwon T, Sung B J, Cha H Jin 2019 Pharm. Res. 36 1Google Scholar

    [23]

    Seki A, Coppinger J A, Jang C Y, Yates J R, Fang G W 2008 Science 320 1655Google Scholar

    [24]

    Glass L, Beuter A, Larocque D 1988 Math. Biosci. 90 111Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang C, Du L P, WangT H, Yang T, Zeng C H, Wang C J 2017 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 96 120

    [26]

    Karamched B R, Bressloff P C 2015 Biophys. J. 108 2408Google Scholar

    [27]

    Steuer R 2004 J. Theor. Biol. 228 293Google Scholar

    [28]

    Kyrychko Y N and Schwartz I B 2018 Chaos 28 063106Google Scholar

    [29]

    McAdams H H, Arkin A 1999 Trends Gene. 15 65Google Scholar

    [30]

    Vilar J M G, Kueh H Y, Barkai N, Leibler S 2002 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 5988Google Scholar

    [31]

    Morrison J F, Walsh C T 1988 Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas. Mol. Biol. 61 201

    [32]

    Roskoski R, Ritchie P A 2001 Biochemistry 40 9329Google Scholar

    [33]

    Vodermaier H C 2004 Curr. Biol. 14 R787Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zitouni S, Nabais C, Jana S C, Guerrero A, Bettencourt-Dias M 2014 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15 433Google Scholar

    [35]

    Glass D S, Jin X F, Riedel-Kruse I H 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 1Google Scholar

    [36]

    Huang B, Tian X Y, Liu F, Wang W 2016 Phys. Rev. E 94 052413Google Scholar

    [37]

    Ott W 2008 Comm. Math. Phys. 281 775Google Scholar

    [38]

    Pomerening J R, Kim S Y, Ferrell J E 2005 Cell 122 565Google Scholar

    [39]

    Lin K K, Young L S 2008 Nonlinearity 21 899Google Scholar

    [40]

    Kuznetsov A P, Turukina L V, Mosekilde E 2001 Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 11 1065Google Scholar

  • [1] 胡洲, 曾招云, 唐佳, 罗小兵. 周期驱动的二能级系统中的准宇称-时间对称动力学. 物理学报, 2022, 71(7): 074207. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20220270
    [2] 胡洲, 曾招云, 唐佳, 罗小兵. 周期驱动的二能级系统中的准宇称-时间对称动力学. 物理学报, 2022, 0(0): 0-0. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220270
    [3] 张欢, 张皓晶, 陆林, 马凯旋. CGRaBS J2345-1555多波段流量相关性及射电波段多普勒因子估计. 物理学报, 2021, 70(21): 219501. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210745
    [4] 廖晶晶, 蔺福军. 混合手征活性粒子在时间延迟反馈下的扩散和分离. 物理学报, 2020, 69(22): 220501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200505
    [5] 于文婷, 张娟, 唐军. 动态突触、神经耦合与时间延迟对神经元发放的影响. 物理学报, 2017, 66(20): 200201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.200201
    [6] 李翔, 刘锋, 帅建伟. 癌细胞信号网络动力学研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(17): 178704. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.178704
    [7] 王文娟, 童培庆. 广义Fibonacci时间准周期量子行走波包扩散的动力学特性. 物理学报, 2016, 65(16): 160501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.160501
    [8] 于文婷, 唐军, 罗进明. 时间延迟对基因调节回路中生物记忆影响研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(6): 068702. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.068702
    [9] 杨青, 杜广庆, 陈烽, 吴艳敏, 欧燕, 陆宇, 侯洵. 时间整形飞秒激光诱导熔融硅表面纳米周期条纹的电子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(4): 047901. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.047901
    [10] 邱巍, 高波, 林鹏, 周婧婷, 李佳, 蒋秋莉, 吕品, 马英驰. 掺铒光纤中亚稳态粒子振荡和慢光时间延迟关系研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(21): 214205. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.214205
    [11] 邝玉兰, 唐国宁. 利用短期心脏记忆消除螺旋波和时空混沌. 物理学报, 2012, 61(19): 190501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.190501
    [12] 王参军. 随机基因选择模型中的延迟效应. 物理学报, 2012, 61(5): 050501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.050501
    [13] 李琴, 郭红. 宽频脉冲光的传播特性. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 054204. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.054204
    [14] 杨林静. Logistic系统跃迁率的时间延迟效应. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 050502. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.050502
    [15] 林灵, 闫勇, 梅冬成. 时间延迟增强双稳系统的共振抑制. 物理学报, 2010, 59(4): 2240-2243. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2240
    [16] 谢振华, 许录平, 倪广仁. 基于双谱的脉冲星累积脉冲轮廓时间延迟测量. 物理学报, 2008, 57(10): 6683-6688. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6683
    [17] 邱 巍, 掌蕴东, 叶建波, 田 赫, 王 楠, 王 号, 王金芳, 袁 萍. 损耗可控条件下掺铒光纤中光速减慢现象的研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(4): 2242-2247. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2242
    [18] 郭永峰, 徐 伟. 关联白噪声驱动的具有时间延迟的Logistic系统. 物理学报, 2008, 57(10): 6081-6085. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6081
    [19] 杨 汝, 张 波. DC-DC buck变换器时间延迟反馈混沌化控制. 物理学报, 2007, 56(7): 3789-3795. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3789
    [20] 黄显高, 徐健学, 黄伟, 朱甫臣. 混沌系统的时间延迟同步误差分析. 物理学报, 2001, 50(12): 2296-2302. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2296
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3499
  • PDF下载量:  82
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-02-15
  • 修回日期:  2021-05-25
  • 上网日期:  2021-10-03
  • 刊出日期:  2021-10-20

/

返回文章
返回