搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一维有序单链水红外吸收光谱的分子动力学模拟

章其林 王瑞丰 周同 王允杰 刘琪

引用本文:
Citation:

一维有序单链水红外吸收光谱的分子动力学模拟

章其林, 王瑞丰, 周同, 王允杰, 刘琪

Molecular dynamics simulation of infrared absorption spectra of one-dimensional ordered single-file water

Zhang Qi-Lin, Wang Rui-Feng, Zhou Tong, Wang Yun-Jie, Liu Qi
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 水在纳米通道中会表现出与体相水不一样的独特结构和动力学性质, 但现有实验技术依然无法有效地进行探测和表征. 光谱是用于研究和鉴别物质成分及其特性的有效技术手段, 因此本文利用分子动力学模拟计算了受限在(6, 6)单壁碳纳米管中一维有序单链状水(single-file water, SW)的红外吸收光谱, 研究发现SW在0—35 THz区域内的主峰相对于体相水有明显的蓝移和增强, 分析表明是由于SW的有序性导致分子间的摆转(libration)振动(包括rock, twist, wag三种模式)耦合权重发生变化引起的, 即频率较高的twist和wag模式在SW中相对体相水中束缚能减小, 振动相对容易发生, 从而导致谱峰发生蓝移和增强. 与此同时, 研究表明SW光谱分量特性能很好地预测和解释SW的结构和动力学性质. 进一步地, 太赫兹电场效应模拟实验验证了SW的红外吸收能力基本符合光谱的分布特性.
    Compared with bulk water (BW), the water in nanochannels usually shows unique structural and dynamic properties, which is still unable to be effectively detected and characterized by existing experimental techniques. The spectrum is an effective technical means for studying and identifying the material composition and characteristics. In this study, the infrared absorption spectra of one-dimensional ordered single-file water (SW) confined in (6, 6) single-walled carbon nanotubes are calculated by molecular dynamics simulation. It is found that the ordered arrangement of SW results in an obvious blue shift and enhancement of the spectral peak in the 0–35 THz range relative to the bulk water. The analysis shows that this phenomenon is caused by the change of coupling weight of libration vibrations (including rock, twist and wag modes) of SW. The twist vibration mode and wag vibration mode with higher frequency are relatively easy to occur because the binding energy decreases under the single chain structure of water, which results in the blue shift and enhancement of the spectral peak. Meanwhile, the present study shows that the spectral component characteristics of SW can well predict and explain the structural and dynamic properties of SW. Further, terahertz simulation experiments show that the infrared absorption capacity of SW basically conforms with the spectral distribution characteristics.
      通信作者: 章其林, qlzhang@ahpu.edu.cn ; 刘琪, modieer_67@ahpu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11604001)、安徽省教育厅高校杰出青年科研项目(批准号: 2022AH020064)和安徽省自然科学基金(批准号: 2008085ME132)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Zhang Qi-Lin, qlzhang@ahpu.edu.cn ; Liu Qi, modieer_67@ahpu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11604001), the Outstanding Youth Fund of Anhui Provincial Department of Education, China (Grant No. 2022AH020064), and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, China (Grant No. 2008085ME132)
    [1]

    Ball P 2008 Chem. Rev. 108 74Google Scholar

    [2]

    方海平 2016 物理学报 65 186101Google Scholar

    Fang H P 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 186101Google Scholar

    [3]

    叶树集, 李传召, 张佳慧, 谈军军, 罗毅 2019 物理学报 68 013101Google Scholar

    Ye S J, Li C Z, Zhang J H, Tan J J, Luo Y 2019 Acta. Phys. Sin. 68 013101Google Scholar

    [4]

    Heyden M, Tobias D J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 218101Google Scholar

    [5]

    王强, 曹则贤 2019 物理学报 68 015101Google Scholar

    Wang Q, Cao Z X 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 015101Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hassan J, Diamantopoulos G, Homouz D, Papavassiliou G 2016 Nanotechnol. Rev. 5 341

    [7]

    Wang C L, Lu H J, Wang Z G, Xiu P, Zhou B, Zuo G H, Wan R Z, Hu J, Fang H P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 137801Google Scholar

    [8]

    Laage D, Elsaesser T, Hynes J T 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 10694Google Scholar

    [9]

    Groot B L, Grubmuller H 2001 Science 294 2353Google Scholar

    [10]

    Jensen M, Borhani D W, Lindorff-Larsen K, Maragakis P, Jogini V, Eastwood M P, Dror R O, Shaw D E 2002 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 6731Google Scholar

    [11]

    Akeson M, Deamer D W, Branton D, Kasianowicz J J, Brandin E 1999 Biophys. J. 60 101

    [12]

    Pomès R, Roux B 1996 Biophys. J. 71 19Google Scholar

    [13]

    Jiang Y X, Lee A, Chen J, Cadene M, Chait B T, MacKinnon R 2002 Nature 417 515Google Scholar

    [14]

    Hummer G, Jayendran C, Rasaiah, Noworyta J P 2001 Nature 414 188Google Scholar

    [15]

    Holt J K, Park H G, Wang Y M, Stadermann M, Artyukhin A, Grigoropoulos C, Noy A, Bakajin O 2006 Science 312 1034Google Scholar

    [16]

    Xue M M, Hu Z L, Qiu H, Shen C, Guo W, Zhang Z 2021 Natl. Sci. Rev. 9 9

    [17]

    Zhang Q L, Jiang W Z, Liu J, Miao R D, Sheng N 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 254501Google Scholar

    [18]

    Kalra A, Garde S, Hummer G 2003 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 10175Google Scholar

    [19]

    Tu Y, Xiu P, Wan R, Hu J, Zhou R, Fang H 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 18120Google Scholar

    [20]

    García F R, Sansom M S 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 6939Google Scholar

    [21]

    Oyarzua E, Walther J H, Megaridis C M, Koumoutsakos P, Zambrano H A 2017 ACS Nano. 11 9997Google Scholar

    [22]

    Fang H P, Wan R Z, Gong X J, Lu H J, Li J C 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 103002Google Scholar

    [23]

    Fan W, Chen J G 2020 Phys. Rev. E 101 010101

    [24]

    Jin L, Zhang D P, Zhu Y, Yang X R, Gao Y, Wang Z G 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 350

    [25]

    Du Q, Freysz E, Shen Y R 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 238Google Scholar

    [26]

    Gan W, Wu D, Zhang Z, Feng R R, Wang H F 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 124 114705Google Scholar

    [27]

    Zhang J, Tan J, Pei R, Ye S, Luo Y 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 13074Google Scholar

    [28]

    Alfarano S R, Pezzotti S, Stein C J, et al. 2021 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118 47

    [29]

    Praprotnik M, Janežic D, Mavri J 2004 J. Phys. Chem. A 108 11056Google Scholar

    [30]

    Al-Abadleh H A, Grassian V 2005 Langmuir 19 341

    [31]

    Bezerra D M, Rodrigues J E, Assaf E 2017 Mater. Charact. 125 29Google Scholar

    [32]

    Tayal V P, Srivastava B K, Khandelwal D P, Bist H D 1980 Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 16 43Google Scholar

    [33]

    Carey D M, Korenowski G M 1996 J. Chem. Phys. 108 2669

    [34]

    Lepodise L M, Horvat J, Lewis R A 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 20252

    [35]

    Dalla B S, Paineau E, Brubach J B, Judeinstein P, Rouzière S, Launois P, Roy P 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 15 20252

    [36]

    Nihonyanagi S, Yamaguchi S, Tahara T 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 6867Google Scholar

    [37]

    Praprotnik M, Janezic D, Merzel F 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 122 174101Google Scholar

    [38]

    Nagata Y, Mukamel S 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 6434Google Scholar

    [39]

    Imoto S, Xantheas S S, Saito S 2015 J. Phys. Chem. B. 119 11068Google Scholar

    [40]

    Yang R Y, Jiang W Z, Huo P Y 2022 J. Mol. Liq. 366 120286Google Scholar

    [41]

    William H, Andrew D, Klaus S 1996 J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 14 33Google Scholar

    [42]

    Phillips J C, Braun R, Wang W, et al. 2005 J. Comput. Chem. 26 1781Google Scholar

    [43]

    MacKerell A D, Bashford D, Bellott M, et al. 1998 J. Phys. Chem. B 102 3586Google Scholar

    [44]

    Darden T, York D, Pedersen L 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 10089Google Scholar

    [45]

    Jorgensen W L, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J D, Impey R W, Klein M L 1983 J. Chem. Phys. 79 926Google Scholar

    [46]

    Kou J, Yao J, Lu H J, Zhang B, Li A F, Sun Z X, Zhang J G, Fang Y Z, Wu F M, Fan J T 2015 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54 2351Google Scholar

    [47]

    Lu Y, Wang Y, Xu C, Xie C, Li W, Ding J, Zhou W, Qin Z, Shen X, Luo L 2021 Nanoscale 13 1000Google Scholar

    [48]

    Zhu Z, Sheng N, Wan R, Fang H J 2014 Phys. Chem. A 118 8936Google Scholar

    [49]

    Guo Y W, Qin J Y, Hu J H, Cao J H, Zhu Z, Wang C L 2020 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31 53Google Scholar

    [50]

    Perakis F, Marco L D, Shalit A, et al. 2016 Chem. Rev. 116 7590Google Scholar

    [51]

    Cygan R T, Daemen L L, Ilgen A G, Krumhansl J L, Nenoff T M 2015 J. Phys. Chem. 11 9

    [52]

    Maréchal Y 2011 J. Mol. Struct. 1004 146Google Scholar

    [53]

    Heyden M, Sun J, Funkner S, Mathias G, Forbert H, Havenith M, Marxb D 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 12068Google Scholar

    [54]

    段铜川, 闫韶健, 赵妍, 孙庭钰, 李阳梅, 朱智 2021 物理学报 70 248702Google Scholar

    Duan T C, Yan S J, Zhao Y, Sun T Y, Li Y M, Zhu Z 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 248702Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zhang Q L, Wu Y X, Yang R Y, Zhang J L, Wang R F 2021 Chem. Phys. Lett. 762 138139Google Scholar

    [56]

    Sun Q 2009 Vib. Spectrosc. 51 213Google Scholar

    [57]

    Zhang Q L, Yang R Y, Jiang W Z, Huang Z Q 2016 Nanoscale 28 1886

    [58]

    Zhu Z, Chang C, Shu Y, Song B 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 256Google Scholar

    [59]

    Conti N V, Havenith M 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 12800Google Scholar

    [60]

    Yang R Y, Huang Z Q, Wei S N, Zhang Q L, Jiang W Z 2017 J. Mol. Liq. 229 148Google Scholar

    [61]

    Saitta A M, Saija F, Giaquinta P V 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 207801Google Scholar

    [62]

    Ma M, Grey F, Shen L, Urbakh M, Wu S, Liu J Z, Liu Y L, Zheng Q S 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 692Google Scholar

    [63]

    Zhang Q L, Yang R Y, Wang C L, Hu J 2022 Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 114202Google Scholar

    [64]

    彭晓昱, 周欢 2021 物理学报 70 240701Google Scholar

    Peng X Y, Zhou H 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 240701Google Scholar

    [65]

    Sun T Y, Zhu Z 2022 J. Membr. Sci. 662 121026Google Scholar

  • 图 1  模拟系统示意图. 一个长10 nm无盖的(6, 6) SWNT夹在两片石墨烯之间, 里面填充了一条由37个水分子组成的水链, 石墨烯墙两侧是水库. 图中棕褐色、红色和白色小球分别代表C, O和H原子. 下侧小图为碳管中水分子的局部放大图, 绿色为水分子间的氢键

    Fig. 1.  Schematic diagram of the simulation system. A 10 nm uncovered (6, 6) SWNT is sandwiched between two graphene sheets. A water chain consisting of 37 water molecules is inside the SWNT, and reservoirs are located on both sides of the graphene wall. The brown, red and white spheres represent C, O and H atoms respectively. The insert shows a partial magnified view of water molecules with the H-bond (green) inside the SWNT

    图 2  水分子各种振动模式示意图. 图中红色和灰色小球分别代表O和H原子, 绿色弹簧代表水分子间的氢键, 箭头表示振动或转动方向. 子图(a)−(h)分别为水分子的H-bond pend (悬摆), H-bond stretch (伸缩), rock (旋摆), twist (扭摆), wag (摇摆), bend (弯曲), symmetric stretch (对称伸缩) 和 asymmetric stretch (不对称伸缩) 振动模式, 其中子图(c), (d), (e)中的黑点表示水分子的质心, 黑色虚线代表绕轴

    Fig. 2.  Schematic diagram of various vibration modes of water molecules. The red and grey balls represent O and H atoms respectively, and the arrows indicate the direction of vibration or rotation. The (a)−(h) subgraphs represent the H-bond pend, H-bond stretch, rock, twist, wag, bend, symmetric stretch and asymmetric stretch vibration modes of water molecules, respectively. The black dots in (c), (d) and (e) represent the center of mass of water molecules, and the black dotted lines represent the axis of rotation

    图 3  (a) 体相水(BW)和单链水(SW)的全域红外光谱图, $ I^{{\rm{BW}}}_ {\rm{total}} $$ I^{{\rm{SW}}}_ {\rm{total}} $分别表示BW和SW的光谱强度, 虚线表示峰的中心位置频率; (b) SW 光谱的0—35 THz放大图

    Fig. 3.  (a) Total infrared spectra of BW and SW, $ I^{{\rm{BW}}}_ {\rm{total}} $ and $ I^{{\rm{SW}}}_ {\rm{total}} $ represents the spectral intensity of BW and SW respectively, and the dotted line represents the cental position frequency of the peak; (b) magnification of SW spectrum in 0–35 THz range

    图 4  BW(上层)和SW(下层)的红外光谱强度在$ x $, $ y $, z三个方向的分量(蓝, 绿, 红)分别为$ I^{{\rm{BW}}}_{x} $, $ I^{{\rm{BW}}}_{y} $, $ I^{{\rm{BW}}}_{z} $$ I^{{\rm{SW}}}_{x} $, $ I^{{\rm{SW}}}_{y} $, $ I^{{\rm{SW}}}_{z} $. 下层图中$ I^{{\rm{SW}}}_{\rm{total}} $(灰色)为SW的总光强

    Fig. 4.  Intensity components of IR of BW (upper) and SW (lower) in the three directions of $ x $ (blue), $ y $ (green), and $ z $ (red). The $ I^{{\rm{SW}}}_{\rm{total}} $ (grey) is the total spectral intensity

    图 5  $I_{\rm{H_{2}O} }^{\rm{SW}} $, $ I_{ {{\rm{D}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{O}} }^{\rm{SW}} $$ I_{\rm{H_{2}O/D_{2}O=1} }^{\rm{SW}} $分别表示(6, 6) SWNT中普通水($ \rm{H_2 O} $)、重水($ \rm{D_2 O} $)及二者按照1∶1混合水的红外光谱强度. 插图为普通水和重水按照1∶1间隔混合后的示意图, 其中红色、白色和蓝色小球分别代表O, H和D原子

    Fig. 5.  $I_{\rm{H_{2}O} }^{\rm{SW}}$, $I_{ {{\rm{D}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{O}} }^{\rm{SW}}$ and $ I_{\rm{H_{2}O/D_{2}O=1} }^{\rm{SW}} $ represent the light water, heavy water and mixed water with $ {{\rm{H}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{O/}}{{\rm{D}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{O}}= $ 1 inside the (6, 6) SWNT, respectively. The insert shows the diagram of the mixed water at a 1 to 1 intervals, where the red, white and blue balls stand for O, H and D atoms, respectively.

    图 6  (a)水的太赫兹效应模拟示意图, 其中纳米管中的水被施加了太赫兹电磁场 (terahertz electromagnetic field), 其中电场E, 磁场B, 传播k方向构成右手螺旋关系; (b)碳纳米管中水的平均氢键数$\overline{N}_{{\rm{HB}}}$和平均动能 $\overline{E}_{{\rm{k}}}$随模拟时间t的变化, 图中蓝色、绿色、红色和黑色曲线分别代表$E_x$, $E_y$, $E_z$和zero-field (${{E}}_0$ = 0) 情况

    Fig. 6.  Schematic diagram of water terahertz effect simulation. The water inside the SWNT are applied with the terahertz electric field. The E, B, k form a right-hand spiral relationship. (b) The average H-bond number ($\overline{N}_{{\rm{HB}}}$) and kinetic energy ($\overline{E}_{{\rm{k}}}$) of water and inside the SWNT with time t. The blue, green, red and black curves represent the cases of $E_x$, $E_y$, $E_z$ and zero-field (${{E}}_0$ = 0)

    表 1  柔性TIP3P水模型力场参数. $r_{_{\rm{OH}}}$表示H—O 键的平衡距离; $\theta_{_{\rm{HOH}}}$表示角H—O—H的平衡角度; $q_{\rm{H}}$, $q_{\rm{O}}$为氢原子、氧原子的电荷量; k, $k_{{\theta}}$为伸缩振动和弯曲振动的弹性系数

    Table 1.  Force field parameters of flexible TIP3P water model. The $r_{\rm{{OH}}}$ represents the equilibrium distance of O—H bond; $\theta_{_{\rm{HOH}}}$ is the equilibrium angle of angle H—O—H; $q_{\rm{H}}$, $q_{\rm{{O}}}$ are the charge amount of hydrogen and oxygen atoms; k, $k_{{\theta}}$ are the elastic coefficients of stretching and bending vibrations

    Parameter Value
    $\sigma_{{\rm{OO} }}/ $Å 3.1506
    $\epsilon_{ {\rm{OO} } }/(\rm{kcal {\cdot} mol^{-1} })$ 0.1521
    $r_{{\rm{OH}}}/$Å 0.9572
    $q_{\rm{H} } / {{e_0} }$ 0.4170
    $q_{ {\rm{O} } }/ {{e_0} }$ –0.8340
    $\theta_{ {\rm{HOH} } }/(^\circ)$ 104.52
    kθ/(kcal·mol–1·rad–2) 55
    k/(kcal·mol–1·Å–2) 450
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Ball P 2008 Chem. Rev. 108 74Google Scholar

    [2]

    方海平 2016 物理学报 65 186101Google Scholar

    Fang H P 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 186101Google Scholar

    [3]

    叶树集, 李传召, 张佳慧, 谈军军, 罗毅 2019 物理学报 68 013101Google Scholar

    Ye S J, Li C Z, Zhang J H, Tan J J, Luo Y 2019 Acta. Phys. Sin. 68 013101Google Scholar

    [4]

    Heyden M, Tobias D J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 218101Google Scholar

    [5]

    王强, 曹则贤 2019 物理学报 68 015101Google Scholar

    Wang Q, Cao Z X 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 015101Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hassan J, Diamantopoulos G, Homouz D, Papavassiliou G 2016 Nanotechnol. Rev. 5 341

    [7]

    Wang C L, Lu H J, Wang Z G, Xiu P, Zhou B, Zuo G H, Wan R Z, Hu J, Fang H P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 137801Google Scholar

    [8]

    Laage D, Elsaesser T, Hynes J T 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 10694Google Scholar

    [9]

    Groot B L, Grubmuller H 2001 Science 294 2353Google Scholar

    [10]

    Jensen M, Borhani D W, Lindorff-Larsen K, Maragakis P, Jogini V, Eastwood M P, Dror R O, Shaw D E 2002 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 6731Google Scholar

    [11]

    Akeson M, Deamer D W, Branton D, Kasianowicz J J, Brandin E 1999 Biophys. J. 60 101

    [12]

    Pomès R, Roux B 1996 Biophys. J. 71 19Google Scholar

    [13]

    Jiang Y X, Lee A, Chen J, Cadene M, Chait B T, MacKinnon R 2002 Nature 417 515Google Scholar

    [14]

    Hummer G, Jayendran C, Rasaiah, Noworyta J P 2001 Nature 414 188Google Scholar

    [15]

    Holt J K, Park H G, Wang Y M, Stadermann M, Artyukhin A, Grigoropoulos C, Noy A, Bakajin O 2006 Science 312 1034Google Scholar

    [16]

    Xue M M, Hu Z L, Qiu H, Shen C, Guo W, Zhang Z 2021 Natl. Sci. Rev. 9 9

    [17]

    Zhang Q L, Jiang W Z, Liu J, Miao R D, Sheng N 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 254501Google Scholar

    [18]

    Kalra A, Garde S, Hummer G 2003 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 10175Google Scholar

    [19]

    Tu Y, Xiu P, Wan R, Hu J, Zhou R, Fang H 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 18120Google Scholar

    [20]

    García F R, Sansom M S 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 6939Google Scholar

    [21]

    Oyarzua E, Walther J H, Megaridis C M, Koumoutsakos P, Zambrano H A 2017 ACS Nano. 11 9997Google Scholar

    [22]

    Fang H P, Wan R Z, Gong X J, Lu H J, Li J C 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 103002Google Scholar

    [23]

    Fan W, Chen J G 2020 Phys. Rev. E 101 010101

    [24]

    Jin L, Zhang D P, Zhu Y, Yang X R, Gao Y, Wang Z G 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 350

    [25]

    Du Q, Freysz E, Shen Y R 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 238Google Scholar

    [26]

    Gan W, Wu D, Zhang Z, Feng R R, Wang H F 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 124 114705Google Scholar

    [27]

    Zhang J, Tan J, Pei R, Ye S, Luo Y 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 13074Google Scholar

    [28]

    Alfarano S R, Pezzotti S, Stein C J, et al. 2021 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118 47

    [29]

    Praprotnik M, Janežic D, Mavri J 2004 J. Phys. Chem. A 108 11056Google Scholar

    [30]

    Al-Abadleh H A, Grassian V 2005 Langmuir 19 341

    [31]

    Bezerra D M, Rodrigues J E, Assaf E 2017 Mater. Charact. 125 29Google Scholar

    [32]

    Tayal V P, Srivastava B K, Khandelwal D P, Bist H D 1980 Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 16 43Google Scholar

    [33]

    Carey D M, Korenowski G M 1996 J. Chem. Phys. 108 2669

    [34]

    Lepodise L M, Horvat J, Lewis R A 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 20252

    [35]

    Dalla B S, Paineau E, Brubach J B, Judeinstein P, Rouzière S, Launois P, Roy P 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 15 20252

    [36]

    Nihonyanagi S, Yamaguchi S, Tahara T 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 6867Google Scholar

    [37]

    Praprotnik M, Janezic D, Merzel F 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 122 174101Google Scholar

    [38]

    Nagata Y, Mukamel S 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 6434Google Scholar

    [39]

    Imoto S, Xantheas S S, Saito S 2015 J. Phys. Chem. B. 119 11068Google Scholar

    [40]

    Yang R Y, Jiang W Z, Huo P Y 2022 J. Mol. Liq. 366 120286Google Scholar

    [41]

    William H, Andrew D, Klaus S 1996 J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 14 33Google Scholar

    [42]

    Phillips J C, Braun R, Wang W, et al. 2005 J. Comput. Chem. 26 1781Google Scholar

    [43]

    MacKerell A D, Bashford D, Bellott M, et al. 1998 J. Phys. Chem. B 102 3586Google Scholar

    [44]

    Darden T, York D, Pedersen L 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 10089Google Scholar

    [45]

    Jorgensen W L, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J D, Impey R W, Klein M L 1983 J. Chem. Phys. 79 926Google Scholar

    [46]

    Kou J, Yao J, Lu H J, Zhang B, Li A F, Sun Z X, Zhang J G, Fang Y Z, Wu F M, Fan J T 2015 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54 2351Google Scholar

    [47]

    Lu Y, Wang Y, Xu C, Xie C, Li W, Ding J, Zhou W, Qin Z, Shen X, Luo L 2021 Nanoscale 13 1000Google Scholar

    [48]

    Zhu Z, Sheng N, Wan R, Fang H J 2014 Phys. Chem. A 118 8936Google Scholar

    [49]

    Guo Y W, Qin J Y, Hu J H, Cao J H, Zhu Z, Wang C L 2020 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31 53Google Scholar

    [50]

    Perakis F, Marco L D, Shalit A, et al. 2016 Chem. Rev. 116 7590Google Scholar

    [51]

    Cygan R T, Daemen L L, Ilgen A G, Krumhansl J L, Nenoff T M 2015 J. Phys. Chem. 11 9

    [52]

    Maréchal Y 2011 J. Mol. Struct. 1004 146Google Scholar

    [53]

    Heyden M, Sun J, Funkner S, Mathias G, Forbert H, Havenith M, Marxb D 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 12068Google Scholar

    [54]

    段铜川, 闫韶健, 赵妍, 孙庭钰, 李阳梅, 朱智 2021 物理学报 70 248702Google Scholar

    Duan T C, Yan S J, Zhao Y, Sun T Y, Li Y M, Zhu Z 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 248702Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zhang Q L, Wu Y X, Yang R Y, Zhang J L, Wang R F 2021 Chem. Phys. Lett. 762 138139Google Scholar

    [56]

    Sun Q 2009 Vib. Spectrosc. 51 213Google Scholar

    [57]

    Zhang Q L, Yang R Y, Jiang W Z, Huang Z Q 2016 Nanoscale 28 1886

    [58]

    Zhu Z, Chang C, Shu Y, Song B 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 256Google Scholar

    [59]

    Conti N V, Havenith M 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 12800Google Scholar

    [60]

    Yang R Y, Huang Z Q, Wei S N, Zhang Q L, Jiang W Z 2017 J. Mol. Liq. 229 148Google Scholar

    [61]

    Saitta A M, Saija F, Giaquinta P V 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 207801Google Scholar

    [62]

    Ma M, Grey F, Shen L, Urbakh M, Wu S, Liu J Z, Liu Y L, Zheng Q S 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 692Google Scholar

    [63]

    Zhang Q L, Yang R Y, Wang C L, Hu J 2022 Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 114202Google Scholar

    [64]

    彭晓昱, 周欢 2021 物理学报 70 240701Google Scholar

    Peng X Y, Zhou H 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 240701Google Scholar

    [65]

    Sun T Y, Zhu Z 2022 J. Membr. Sci. 662 121026Google Scholar

  • [1] 陈晶晶, 赵洪坡, 王葵, 占慧敏, 罗泽宇. SiC基底覆多层石墨烯力学强化性能分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2024, 73(10): 109601. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20232031
    [2] 张宇航, 李孝宝, 詹春晓, 王美芹, 浦玉学. 单层MoSSe力学性质的分子动力学模拟研究. 物理学报, 2023, 72(4): 046201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221815
    [3] 张超, 布龙祥, 张智超, 樊朝霞, 凡凤仙. 丁二酸-水纳米气溶胶液滴表面张力的分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2023, 72(11): 114701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222371
    [4] 王康, 徐成, 吴晋锋, 杨恺, 元冰. 蜂毒肽与单组分脂膜相互作用的单分子研究. 物理学报, 2021, 70(17): 178701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210477
    [5] 第伍旻杰, 胡晓棉. 单晶Ce冲击相变的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2020, 69(11): 116202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200323
    [6] 李杰杰, 鲁斌斌, 线跃辉, 胡国明, 夏热. 纳米多孔银力学性能表征分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2018, 67(5): 056101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172193
    [7] 董琪琪, 胡海豹, 陈少强, 何强, 鲍路瑶. 水滴撞击结冰过程的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2018, 67(5): 054702. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172174
    [8] 尹灵康, 徐顺, Seongmin Jeong, Yongseok Jho, 王健君, 周昕. 广义等温等压系综-分子动力学模拟全原子水的气液共存形貌. 物理学报, 2017, 66(13): 136102. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.136102
    [9] 张宝玲, 宋小勇, 侯氢, 汪俊. 高密度氦相变的分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(1): 016202. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.016202
    [10] 华昀峰, 张冬, 章林溪. 半刚性高分子链螺旋结构诱导纳米棒的有序结构. 物理学报, 2015, 64(8): 088201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.088201
    [11] 常旭. 多层石墨烯的表面起伏的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2014, 63(8): 086102. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.086102
    [12] 刘华敏, 范永胜, 田时海, 周维, 陈旭. 分子动力学模拟压水反应堆中氢气对水的影响. 物理学报, 2012, 61(6): 062801. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.062801
    [13] 范永胜, 陈旭, 周维, 史顺平, 李勇. 分子动力学模拟压水反应堆中联氨对水的影响. 物理学报, 2011, 60(3): 032802. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.032802
    [14] 曹荣根, 王音, 林正喆, 明辰, 庄军, 宁西京. 一种制备单原子碳链的方案. 物理学报, 2010, 59(9): 6438-6442. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6438
    [15] 师丽红, 阎文博. 纯铌酸锂晶体红外光谱的低温研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(7): 4987-4991. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.4987
    [16] 邵建立, 王 裴, 秦承森, 周洪强. 铁冲击相变的分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(9): 5389-5393. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5389
    [17] 岳伟伟, 王卫宁, 赵国忠, 张存林, 闫海涛. 芳香族氨基酸的太赫兹光谱研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(7): 3094-3099. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3094
    [18] 许圣华, 辛 煜, 宁兆元, 程珊华, 黄 松, 陆新华, 项苏留, 陈 军. ECR-CVD制备的非晶SiOxNy薄膜的光致蓝光发射. 物理学报, 2003, 52(5): 1287-1291. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1287
    [19] 吴恒安, 倪向贵, 王宇, 王秀喜. 金属纳米棒弯曲力学行为的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2002, 51(7): 1412-1415. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1412
    [20] 辛煜, 宁兆元, 程珊华, 陆新华, 甘肇强, 黄松. ECR-CVD法制备的a-C:F:H薄膜在N2气氛中的热退火研究. 物理学报, 2002, 51(2): 439-443. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.439
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2836
  • PDF下载量:  67
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-22
  • 修回日期:  2023-01-14
  • 上网日期:  2023-02-17
  • 刊出日期:  2023-04-20

/

返回文章
返回