搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

石墨烯/GaN异质结构界面热输运性质的分子动力学研究

刘东静 周福 胡志亮 黄家强

引用本文:
Citation:

石墨烯/GaN异质结构界面热输运性质的分子动力学研究

刘东静, 周福, 胡志亮, 黄家强

Molecular dynamics study of interfacial thermal transport properties of graphene/GaN heterostructure

Liu Dong-Jing, Zhou Fu, Hu Zhi-Liang, Huang Jia-Qiang
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 异质结构界面热输运的性能决定微纳米器件工作的可靠性. 本文采用分子动力学方法, 研究石墨烯/GaN三明治结构异质界面的热输运特性, 分析温度、缺陷以及尺寸对异质结构界面热导的影响. 研究发现, 随着温度的升高, 界面热导增大; 当温度为1100 K时, 3层石墨烯异质结构的界面热导增大61%, 分析认为这主要是温度升高导致晶格振动增加, 进而激发更多的平面外声子. GaN中的少量空位缺陷导致界面热导增大, 当缺陷率为20%时, 界面热导达到最大值0.0357 GW/(m2·K), 分析认为缺陷会增加额外的热输运通道; 随后界面热导开始降低, 分析认为缺陷率增大导致界面耦合强度降低. 随着GaN层数从8层增加到24层, 界面热导下降, 计算声子模态发现参与界面热输运声子数量减少; 而石墨烯从2层到6层时, 界面热导先上升后下降, 分析认为这是与声子匹配和耦合强度的初期提高和后期声子散射及局部化增加有关. 该研究结果为调控微电子器件界面热输运提供理论依据.
    The performance of interfacial thermal transport in heterostructure determines the reliability of micro- and nano-scale device. In this study, a molecular dynamics method is used to investigate the interfacial thermal transport properties of graphene/GaN sandwich heterostructure. The effects of temperature, defect, and size on the interface thermal conductance at the heterostructure are analyzed. It is found that the interface thermal conductance increases with temperature rising; at 1100 K, the interface thermal conductance of the 3-layer graphene heterostructure is increased by 61%. This increase is mainly attributed to the enhanced lattice vibrations at higher temperature, which excites more out-of-plane phonons. The presence of minor vacancy defects in GaN leads interface thermal conductance to increase, reaching a maximum value of 0.0357 GW/(m2·K) at a defect rate of 20%. This enhancement is believed to be due to additional thermal transport pathways created by the defects. However, as the defect rate increases further, the interface thermal conductance begins to decrease, which is thought to be due to interfacial coupling strength decreasing. With the number of GaN layers increasing from 8 to 24, the interface thermal conductance decreases, the change is attributed to the decrease of the number of phonons participating in the thermal transport across the interface. Conversely, with the number of graphene layers increasing from 2 to 6, the interface thermal conductance initially increases and then decreases. This behavior is related to initial improvements of phonon matching and coupling strength, followed by the increase in phonon scattering and localization. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for regulating the interfacial thermal transport in microelectronic devices.
      通信作者: 黄家强, huangjiaqiang201@163.com
    • 基金项目: 广西制造系统与先进制造技术重点实验室(批准号: 19-050-44-002Z)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 62264003)、广西自然科学基金(批准号: 2023GXNSFAA026188)和桂林科学研究技术发展计划(批准号: 20220107-2)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Huang Jia-Qiang, huangjiaqiang201@163.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the Key Laboratory of Manufacturing System & Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Guangxi, China (Grant No. 19-050-44-002Z), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62264003), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, China (Grant No. 2023GXNSFAA026188), and the Science Research and Technology Development Program of Guilin, China (Grant No. 20220107-2).
    [1]

    Nguyen M H, Kwak S 2020 Electronics 9 2068Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kimoto T, Watanabe H 2020 Appl. Phys. Exp. 13 120101Google Scholar

    [3]

    Porwal H, Grasso S, Reece M J 2013 Adv. Appl. Ceram 112 443Google Scholar

    [4]

    Inagaki M, Kang F 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 13193Google Scholar

    [5]

    Liu J, Tang J, Gooding J J 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 12435Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hernaez M 2020 Sensors (Basel) 20 3196Google Scholar

    [7]

    Santis J A, Marín-García C A, Sánchez-R V M 2023 J. Cryst. Growth 601 126944Google Scholar

    [8]

    Alexander A B, Suchismita G, Wenzhong B, Irene C, Desalegne T, Feng M, Chun N L 2008 Nano Lett. 8 902Google Scholar

    [9]

    Bao W L, Wang Z L, Chen G F 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 173 121266Google Scholar

    [10]

    Guo Z X, Ding J W, Gong X G 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 235429Google Scholar

    [11]

    Luo T, Lloyd J R 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 2495Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wang T Y, Tsai J L 2016 Comput. Mater. Sci. 122 272Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wang L, Li B W 2007 Phys Rev. Lett. 99 177208Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liu D J 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126077Google Scholar

    [15]

    Yue Y N, Zhang J C, Wang X W 2011 Small 7 3324Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang Z, Guan H W 2014 Appl. Mech. Mater. 487 63Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wang Y, Yang C H, Cheng Y, Zhang Y Y 2015 RSC. Adv. 5 82638Google Scholar

    [18]

    Liu D J, Wang S M, Zhu J J, Li H, Zhu H D 2022 Phys. Lett. A 426 127895Google Scholar

    [19]

    Huang X Y, Zhi C Y, Lin Y, Bao H, Wu G N, Jiang P K, Mai Y W 2020 Mat. Sci. Eng. R 142 100577Google Scholar

    [20]

    Tao L, Theruvakkattil S S, Shahsavari R 2017 ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 989Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yang B, Yang H Y, Li T B, Yang J M, Yang P 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 536 147828Google Scholar

    [22]

    Bao W L, Wang Z L, Hu B Y, Tang D W 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 201 123569Google Scholar

    [23]

    Steve P 1995 J. Comput.Phys 117 1Google Scholar

    [24]

    Lin C P, Rao Z H 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng. 110 1411Google Scholar

    [25]

    Stuart S J, Tutein A B, Harrison J A 2000 J. Chem. Phys. 112 6472Google Scholar

    [26]

    Donald W B, Olga A S, Judith A H, Steven J S, Boris N, Susan B S 2002 J. Phys-Condens. Mat. 14 783Google Scholar

    [27]

    Stillinger F H, Weber T A 1985 Phys. Rev. B 31 5262Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang Y Z, Ma J, Yang J, Zhang Y Y 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 45742Google Scholar

    [29]

    Han D, Wang X Y, Ding W Y, Chen Y, Zhang J C, Xin G M, Cheng L 2019 Nanotechnology 30 075403Google Scholar

    [30]

    Xin W Y, Jing Z C, Yue C, Paddy K L C 2017 Nanoscale 9 2262Google Scholar

    [31]

    Guo Y, Bescond M, Zhang Z, Xiong S, Hirakawa K, Nomura M, Volz S 2021 APL Mater. 9 091104Google Scholar

  • 图 1  3层石墨烯/12层GaN异质结构模型

    Fig. 1.  Model of 3-layer graphene/12-layer GaN heterostructure.

    图 2  石墨烯/GaN异质结构沿热流方向的温度分布(∆T1为GaN层热源温度变化, ∆T2为GaN层冷源温度变化, ∆T为石墨烯中间层温度变化)

    Fig. 2.  Temperature distribution of graphene/GaN heterostructure along the heat flow direction (∆T1 is the temperature change of the heat source of GaN layer, ∆T2 is the cold source temperature change of GaN layer, and ∆T is the temperature change of the middle layer of graphene).

    图 3  (a) ITC与异质结构温度变化的关系; (b)石墨烯和GaN在不同温度下的PDOS; (c)石墨烯和GaN在不同温度下的PDOS重叠区域和重叠因子S

    Fig. 3.  (a) Relationship between the ITC and temperature change of heterostructure; (b) PDOS of graphene and GaN at different temperatures; (c) PDOS overlap regions and the overlap factor S for graphene and GaN at different temperatures.

    图 4  (a)异质结构的ITC与GaN空位缺陷率的关系; (b)不同GaN空位缺陷率下石墨烯和GaN的PDOS; (c)在不同的GaN空位缺陷率下, 石墨烯和GaN的PDOS重叠区域和重叠因子S

    Fig. 4.  (a) Relationship between the ITC and GaN vacancy defect rate of heterostructure; (b) PDOS of graphene and GaN at different GaN vacancy defect rate; (c) PDOS overlap regions and the overlap factor S for graphene and GaN at different GaN vacancy defect rate.

    图 5  (a) ITC与异质结构GaN层数的关系; (b)不同数量GaN层中, 石墨烯和GaN的PDOS; (c)在不同数量的GaN层中, 石墨烯和GaN的PDOS重叠区域和重叠因子S

    Fig. 5.  (a) Relationship between the ITC and the number of GaN layer of heterostructure; (b) PDOS of graphene and GaN at different number of GaN layer; (c) PDOS overlap regions and the overlap factor S for graphene and GaN at different number of GaN layer.

    图 6  (a) ITC与异质结构石墨烯层数的关系; (b)不同数量石墨烯层下石墨烯和GaN的PDOS; (c)不同数量石墨烯层下石墨烯和GaN的PDOS重叠区域和重叠因子S

    Fig. 6.  (a) Relationship between the ITC and the number of graphene layer of heterostructure; (b) PDOS of graphene and GaN at different number of graphene layer; (c) PDOS overlap regions and the overlap factor S for graphene and GaN at different number of graphene layer.

    图 7  3, 4层石墨烯下石墨烯/GaN异质结构的PPR (a)石墨烯; (b) GaN

    Fig. 7.  PPR of graphene/GaN heterostructure with 3 and 4 layers of grapheme: (a) Graphene; (b) GaN.

  • [1]

    Nguyen M H, Kwak S 2020 Electronics 9 2068Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kimoto T, Watanabe H 2020 Appl. Phys. Exp. 13 120101Google Scholar

    [3]

    Porwal H, Grasso S, Reece M J 2013 Adv. Appl. Ceram 112 443Google Scholar

    [4]

    Inagaki M, Kang F 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 13193Google Scholar

    [5]

    Liu J, Tang J, Gooding J J 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 12435Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hernaez M 2020 Sensors (Basel) 20 3196Google Scholar

    [7]

    Santis J A, Marín-García C A, Sánchez-R V M 2023 J. Cryst. Growth 601 126944Google Scholar

    [8]

    Alexander A B, Suchismita G, Wenzhong B, Irene C, Desalegne T, Feng M, Chun N L 2008 Nano Lett. 8 902Google Scholar

    [9]

    Bao W L, Wang Z L, Chen G F 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 173 121266Google Scholar

    [10]

    Guo Z X, Ding J W, Gong X G 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 235429Google Scholar

    [11]

    Luo T, Lloyd J R 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 2495Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wang T Y, Tsai J L 2016 Comput. Mater. Sci. 122 272Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wang L, Li B W 2007 Phys Rev. Lett. 99 177208Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liu D J 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126077Google Scholar

    [15]

    Yue Y N, Zhang J C, Wang X W 2011 Small 7 3324Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang Z, Guan H W 2014 Appl. Mech. Mater. 487 63Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wang Y, Yang C H, Cheng Y, Zhang Y Y 2015 RSC. Adv. 5 82638Google Scholar

    [18]

    Liu D J, Wang S M, Zhu J J, Li H, Zhu H D 2022 Phys. Lett. A 426 127895Google Scholar

    [19]

    Huang X Y, Zhi C Y, Lin Y, Bao H, Wu G N, Jiang P K, Mai Y W 2020 Mat. Sci. Eng. R 142 100577Google Scholar

    [20]

    Tao L, Theruvakkattil S S, Shahsavari R 2017 ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 989Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yang B, Yang H Y, Li T B, Yang J M, Yang P 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 536 147828Google Scholar

    [22]

    Bao W L, Wang Z L, Hu B Y, Tang D W 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 201 123569Google Scholar

    [23]

    Steve P 1995 J. Comput.Phys 117 1Google Scholar

    [24]

    Lin C P, Rao Z H 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng. 110 1411Google Scholar

    [25]

    Stuart S J, Tutein A B, Harrison J A 2000 J. Chem. Phys. 112 6472Google Scholar

    [26]

    Donald W B, Olga A S, Judith A H, Steven J S, Boris N, Susan B S 2002 J. Phys-Condens. Mat. 14 783Google Scholar

    [27]

    Stillinger F H, Weber T A 1985 Phys. Rev. B 31 5262Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang Y Z, Ma J, Yang J, Zhang Y Y 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 45742Google Scholar

    [29]

    Han D, Wang X Y, Ding W Y, Chen Y, Zhang J C, Xin G M, Cheng L 2019 Nanotechnology 30 075403Google Scholar

    [30]

    Xin W Y, Jing Z C, Yue C, Paddy K L C 2017 Nanoscale 9 2262Google Scholar

    [31]

    Guo Y, Bescond M, Zhang Z, Xiong S, Hirakawa K, Nomura M, Volz S 2021 APL Mater. 9 091104Google Scholar

  • [1] 张建威, 牛莹, 闫润圻, 张荣奇, 曹猛, 李永东, 刘纯亮, 张嘉伟. 体空位缺陷对氧化铝二次电子发射特性的影响分析. 物理学报, 2024, 73(15): 157902. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240577
    [2] 桑丽霞, 李志康. Au-TiO2光电极界面声子热输运特性的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2024, 73(10): 103105. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240026
    [3] 刘子怡, 褚福强, 魏俊俊, 冯妍卉. 金刚石/碳纳米管异质界面热导及声子热输运特性. 物理学报, 2024, 73(13): 138102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240323
    [4] 刘东静, 胡志亮, 周福, 王鹏博, 王振东, 李涛. 基于分子动力学的氮化镓/石墨烯/金刚石界面热导研究. 物理学报, 2024, 73(15): 150202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240515
    [5] 宗志成, 潘东楷, 邓世琛, 万骁, 杨哩娜, 马登科, 杨诺. 混合失配模型预测金属/半导体界面热导. 物理学报, 2023, 72(3): 034401. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221981
    [6] 王权杰, 邓宇戈, 王仁宗, 刘向军. 界面工程调控GaN基异质结界面热传导性能研究. 物理学报, 2023, 72(22): 226301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230791
    [7] 刘东静, 周福, 陈帅阳, 胡志亮. 氮化镓/石墨烯/碳化硅异质界面热输运特性的分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2023, 72(15): 157901. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230537
    [8] 刘东静, 王韶铭, 杨平. 石墨烯/碳化硅异质界面热学特性的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2021, 70(18): 187302. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210613
    [9] 费宏明, 严帅, 徐瑜成, 林瀚, 武敏, 杨毅彪, 陈智辉, 田媛, 张娅敏. 可实现宽频带光波非对称传输的自准直效应光子晶体异质结构. 物理学报, 2020, 69(18): 184214. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200538
    [10] 张龙艳, 徐进良, 雷俊鹏. 尺寸效应对微通道内固液界面温度边界的影响. 物理学报, 2019, 68(2): 020201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181876
    [11] 兰生, 李焜, 高新昀. 基于分子动力学的石墨炔纳米带空位缺陷的导热特性. 物理学报, 2017, 66(13): 136801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.136801
    [12] 邹俊辉, 张娟. 混合准周期异质结构的带隙补偿与展宽. 物理学报, 2016, 65(1): 014214. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.014214
    [13] 彭亚晶, 蒋艳雪. 分子空位缺陷对环三亚甲基三硝胺含能材料几何结构、电子结构及振动特性的影响. 物理学报, 2015, 64(24): 243102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.243102
    [14] 谷卓, 班士良. 纤锌矿结构ZnO/MgxZn1-xO量子阱中带间光吸收的尺寸效应和三元混晶效应. 物理学报, 2014, 63(10): 107301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.107301
    [15] 张阳, 顾书林, 叶建东, 黄时敏, 顾然, 陈斌, 朱顺明, 郑有炓. ZnMgO/ZnO异质结构中二维电子气的研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 150202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.150202
    [16] 叶涛, 徐旭明. 高效异质结构四波长波分复用器的设计与优化. 物理学报, 2010, 59(9): 6273-6278. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6273
    [17] 陈青云, 孟川民, 卢铁城, 徐明, 胡又文. 中子嬗变掺杂前后Ge纳米晶的结构和性质. 物理学报, 2010, 59(9): 6473-6479. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6473
    [18] 袁剑辉, 程玉民, 张振华. 空位结构缺陷对C纳米管弹性性质的影响. 物理学报, 2009, 58(4): 2578-2584. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2578
    [19] 欧阳方平, 徐 慧, 魏 辰. Zigzag型石墨纳米带电子结构和输运性质的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(2): 1073-1077. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.1073
    [20] 王庆学. 异质结构的应变和应力分布模型研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(8): 3757-3763. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3757
计量
  • 文章访问数:  582
  • PDF下载量:  41
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-01-04
  • 修回日期:  2024-04-29
  • 上网日期:  2024-05-15
  • 刊出日期:  2024-07-05

/

返回文章
返回