-
Fe基合金薄带的磁性能对应力敏感, 特别是退火过程应力感生磁各向异性是否可以用回火方法消除, 是一个令人感兴趣的科学问题. 本文采用同步辐射X射线衍射技术, 观测Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9非晶薄带经外加394.7 MPa应力540 ℃保温30 min退火后, 进行多次等温回火样品的微观结构, 用SupereyesB011型显微摄像机记录样品应力退火和回火过程的宏观伸长量, 并利用HP4294A型阻抗分析仪测量相应样品的磁各向异性. 对实验数据进行曲线拟合后发现, 虽然应力退火过程的残余应力引起的晶格各向异性是产生磁各向异性的主要原因, 但不是唯一原因, 在应力退火过程中非晶基底的蠕变引起的纳米晶晶粒定向团聚, 也是应力退火感生磁各向异性的重要原因; 而且, 因应力退火过程中非晶基底的蠕变引起纳米晶晶粒定向团聚感生的磁各向异性无法用等温回火方法完全消除.The magnetic properties of Fe-based alloy ribbons are sensitive to stress, and it’s an interesting scientific question whether stress-induced magnetic anisotropy during annealing procedure can be eliminated by tempering. In this paper, the synchrotron radiation technique was used to observe the microstructure of Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9 amorphous ribbons annealed at 540 ℃ for 30 minutes under 394.7MPa stress and tempered several times at the same temperature. The macroscopic elongation of the samples during stress annealing and tempering was recorded by SupereyesB011 microcamera, and the magnetic anisotropy of the samples was measured by HP4294A impedance analyzer. After fitting the experimental data, it is found that: (a) The lattice anisotropy, macroscopic strain and magnetic anisotropy of the sample show negative exponential attenuation with the tempering times, and their final residual are 19.04%. 98.27% and 31.65%. (b) Multiple tempering can not completely eliminate lattice anisotropy, macroscopic strain and magnetic anisotropy induced by stress annealing. (c) The magnetic anisotropy of the sample has a linear relationship with the lattice anisotropy, but the intercept between the reverse extension line of the relation curve and the longitudinal coordinate is not zero. When the lattice anisotropy is zero, there is still 16.36% magnetic anisotropy. This is different from Ohnuma's conclusion that lattice anisotropy is the direct cause of magnetic anisotropy. (d) The structure anisotropy caused by the residual stress after stress annealing is the main cause of magnetic anisotropy, but it is not the only reason. The directional congregation of agglomerated nanocrystalline grains caused by creep of amorphous substrates during stress annealing is also an important cause of magnetic anisotropy induced by stress annealing. Moreover, the magnetic anisotropy induced by the directional congregation of agglomerated nanocrystalline grains due to the creep of amorphous substrates during stress annealing can not be completely eliminated by tempering.
-
Keywords:
- stress annealing /
- tempering /
- structure anisotropy /
- magnetic anisotropy
[1] Yoshizawa Y, Oguma S, Yamauchi K 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 6044
Google Scholar
[2] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1990 Mater. Trans. 31 307
Google Scholar
[3] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1991 Mat. Sci. Eng. A: Struct. 133 176
Google Scholar
[4] Tejedor M, Hernando B, Sanchez M L, Prida V M, Garciabeneytez J M, Vazquez M, Herzer G 1998 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 185 61
Google Scholar
[5] Herzer G 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 258
Google Scholar
[6] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1989 IEEE Trans. Magn. 25 3324
Google Scholar
[7] Kraus L, Zavěta K, Heczko O, Duhaj P, Vlasak G, Schneider J 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 275
Google Scholar
[8] Fukunaga H, Furukawa N, Tanaka H, Nakano M 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 7103
Google Scholar
[9] Herzer G 1994 IEEE Trans. Magn. 30 4800
Google Scholar
[10] 方允樟, 郑金菊, 施方也, 吴锋民, 孙怀君, 林根金, 杨晓红, 满其奎, 叶方敏 2008 中国科学: E辑 技术科学 38 428
Google Scholar
Fang Y Z, Zheng J J, Shi F Y, Wu F M, Sun H J, Lin G J, Yang X H, Man Q K, Ye F M 2008 Sci. Sin. E: Tech. 38 428
Google Scholar
[11] Ohnuma M, Hono K, Yanai T, Nakano M, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 152513
Google Scholar
[12] Hofmann B, Kronmüller H 1996 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 152 91
Google Scholar
[13] Ohnuma M, Hono K, Yanai T, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 2859
Google Scholar
[14] Ohnuma M, Herzer G, Kozikowski P, Polak C, Budinsky V, Koppoju S 2012 Acta Mater. 60 1278
Google Scholar
[15] 杨全民, 王玲玲, 孙德成 2005 物理学报 54 5730
Google Scholar
Yang Q M, Wang L L, Sun D C 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 5730
Google Scholar
[16] 杨全民, 王玲玲 2005 物理学报 54 4256
Google Scholar
Yang Q M, Wang L L 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4256
Google Scholar
[17] Nutor R K, Xu X J, Fan X Z, Ren S S, He X W, Fang Y Z 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 454 51
Google Scholar
[18] Nutor R K, Fan X Z, He X W, Xu X J, Lu X A, Jiang J Z, Fang Y Z 2019 J. Alloy. Compd. 774 1243
Google Scholar
[19] 施方也, 方允樟, 孙怀君, 郑金菊, 林根金, 吴锋民 2007 物理学报 56 4009
Google Scholar
Shi F Y, Fang Y Z, Sun H J, Zheng J J, Lin G J, Wu F M 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 4009
Google Scholar
[20] Fang Y Z, Zheng J J, Wu F M, Xu Q M, Zhang J Q, Ye H Q, Zheng J L, Li T Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 92508
Google Scholar
-
图 1 经应力退火和回火的Fe基薄带的XRD谱
Fig. 1. XRD peaks map of stress annealing and tempering ribbons
图 2 Fe基合金薄带残余晶格各向异性与回火次数的关系曲线
Fig. 2. Relationship between the residual structure anisotropy and tempering times
图 3 Fe基合金薄带残余宏观应变与回火次数的关系曲线
Fig. 3. Relationship between the residual macroscopic strain and tempering times of the ribbon
图 4 薄带应力退火和多次回火的GMI曲线
Fig. 4. GMI curves of stress annealing and multiple tempering ribbons.
图 5 Fe基合金薄带残余磁各向异性与回火次数的关系曲线
Fig. 5. Relationship between the residual magnetic anisotropy and tempering times of the ribbon.
图 6 Fe基合金薄带残余磁各向异性与残余晶格各向异性的关系
Fig. 6. Relationship between the residual magnetic anisotropy and the residual structure anisotropy of the ribbon
常数项 指数项 拟合优度 残余晶格各向异性$\alpha $/% 19.04 $80.93 \times {{\rm{e}}^{ - n/0.51}}$ 0.99829 残余宏观应变$\delta $/% 98.27 $1.73 \times {{\rm{e}}^{ - n/0.48}}$ 0.99913 残余磁各向异性$\gamma $/% 31.65 $68.30 \times {{\rm{e}}^{ - n/0.56}}$ 0.99604 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Yoshizawa Y, Oguma S, Yamauchi K 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 6044
Google Scholar
[2] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1990 Mater. Trans. 31 307
Google Scholar
[3] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1991 Mat. Sci. Eng. A: Struct. 133 176
Google Scholar
[4] Tejedor M, Hernando B, Sanchez M L, Prida V M, Garciabeneytez J M, Vazquez M, Herzer G 1998 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 185 61
Google Scholar
[5] Herzer G 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 258
Google Scholar
[6] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1989 IEEE Trans. Magn. 25 3324
Google Scholar
[7] Kraus L, Zavěta K, Heczko O, Duhaj P, Vlasak G, Schneider J 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 275
Google Scholar
[8] Fukunaga H, Furukawa N, Tanaka H, Nakano M 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 7103
Google Scholar
[9] Herzer G 1994 IEEE Trans. Magn. 30 4800
Google Scholar
[10] 方允樟, 郑金菊, 施方也, 吴锋民, 孙怀君, 林根金, 杨晓红, 满其奎, 叶方敏 2008 中国科学: E辑 技术科学 38 428
Google Scholar
Fang Y Z, Zheng J J, Shi F Y, Wu F M, Sun H J, Lin G J, Yang X H, Man Q K, Ye F M 2008 Sci. Sin. E: Tech. 38 428
Google Scholar
[11] Ohnuma M, Hono K, Yanai T, Nakano M, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 152513
Google Scholar
[12] Hofmann B, Kronmüller H 1996 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 152 91
Google Scholar
[13] Ohnuma M, Hono K, Yanai T, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 2859
Google Scholar
[14] Ohnuma M, Herzer G, Kozikowski P, Polak C, Budinsky V, Koppoju S 2012 Acta Mater. 60 1278
Google Scholar
[15] 杨全民, 王玲玲, 孙德成 2005 物理学报 54 5730
Google Scholar
Yang Q M, Wang L L, Sun D C 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 5730
Google Scholar
[16] 杨全民, 王玲玲 2005 物理学报 54 4256
Google Scholar
Yang Q M, Wang L L 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4256
Google Scholar
[17] Nutor R K, Xu X J, Fan X Z, Ren S S, He X W, Fang Y Z 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 454 51
Google Scholar
[18] Nutor R K, Fan X Z, He X W, Xu X J, Lu X A, Jiang J Z, Fang Y Z 2019 J. Alloy. Compd. 774 1243
Google Scholar
[19] 施方也, 方允樟, 孙怀君, 郑金菊, 林根金, 吴锋民 2007 物理学报 56 4009
Google Scholar
Shi F Y, Fang Y Z, Sun H J, Zheng J J, Lin G J, Wu F M 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 4009
Google Scholar
[20] Fang Y Z, Zheng J J, Wu F M, Xu Q M, Zhang J Q, Ye H Q, Zheng J L, Li T Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 92508
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 6923
- PDF下载量: 46
- 被引次数: 0
