铁电负电容场效应晶体管研究进展

陈俊东; 韩伟华; 杨冲; 赵晓松; 郭仰岩; 张晓迪; 杨富华

doi:10.7498/aps.69.20200354

摘要

铁电负电容场效应晶体管可以突破传统金属氧化物半导体场效应晶体管中的玻尔兹曼限制, 将亚阈值摆幅降低到60 mV/dec以下, 极大地改善了晶体管的开关电流比和短沟道效应, 有效地降低了器件的功耗, 为实现晶体管特征尺寸的减小和摩尔定律的延续提供了选择. 本文分析总结了国内外近年来关于铁电负电容场效应晶体管代表性的研究进展, 为进一步研究提供参考. 首先介绍了铁电负电容场效应晶体管的研究背景及其意义; 然后总结了铁电材料的基本性质和种类, 并对铁电材料负电容的物理机制和铁电负电容场效应晶体管的工作原理进行了讨论; 接下来从器件沟道材料维度的角度, 分别总结了最近几年基于三维沟道材料和二维沟道材料且与氧化铪基铁电体结合的铁电负电容场效应晶体管的研究成果, 并对器件的亚阈值摆幅、开关电流比、回滞电压和漏电流等性能的改善进行了分析概述; 最后对铁电负电容场效应晶体管目前存在的问题和未来的发展方向作了总结与展望.

关键词:

Abstract

Ferroelectric negative capacitance field effect transistors(Fe-NCFETs) can break through the so-called “Boltzmann Tyranny” of traditional metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors and reduce the subthreshold swing below 60 mV/dec, which could greatly improve the on/off current ratio and short-channel effect. Consequently, the power dissipation of the device is effectively lowered. The Fe-NCFET provides a choice for the downscaling of the transistor and the continuation of Moore’s Law. In this review, the representative research progress of Fe-NCFETs in recent years is comprehensively reviewed to conduce to further study. In the first chapter, the background and significance of Fe-NCFETs are introduced. In the second chapter, the basic properties of ferroelectric materials are introduced, and then the types of ferroelectric materials are summarized. Among them, the invention of hafnium oxide-based ferroelectric materials solves the problem of compatibility between traditional ferroelectric materials and CMOS processes, making the performance of NCFETs further improved. In the third chapter, the advantages and disadvantages of Fe-NCFETs with MFS, MFIS and MFMIS structures are first summarized, then from the perspective of atomic microscopic forces the “S” relationship curve of ferroelectric materials is derived and combined with Gibbs free energy formula and L-K equation, and the intrinsic negative capacitance region in the free energy curve of the ferroelectric material is obtained. Next, the steady-state negative capacitance and transient negative capacitance in the ferroelectric capacitor are discussed from the aspects of concept and circuit characteristics; after that the working area of negative capacitance Fe-NCFET is discussed. In the fourth chapter, the significant research results of Fe-NCFETs combined with hafnium-based ferroelectrics in recent years are summarized from the perspective of two-dimensional channel materials and three-dimensional channel materials respectively. Among them, the Fe-NCFETs based on three-dimensional channel materials such as silicon, germanium-based materials, III-V compounds, and carbon nanotubes are more compatible with traditional CMOS processes. The interface between the channel and the ferroelectric layer is better, and the electrical performance is more stable. However, thereremain some problems to be solved in three-dimensional channel materials such as the limited on-state current resulting from the low effective carrier mobility of the silicon, the small on/off current ratio due to the leakage caused by the small bandgap of the germanium-based material, the poor interfacial properties between the III-V compound materials and the dielectric layer, and the ambiguous working mechanism of Fe-NCFETs based on carbon nanotube. Compared with Fe-NCFETs based on three-dimensional channel materials, the Fe-NCFETs based on two-dimensional channel materials such as transition metal chalcogenide, graphene, and black phosphorus provide the possibility for the characteristic size of the transistor to be reduced to 3 nm. However, the interface performance between the two-dimensional channel material and the gate dielectric layer is poor, since there are numerous defect states at the interface. Furthermore, the two-dimensional channel materials have poor compatibility with traditional CMOS process. Hence, it is imperative to search for new approaches to finding a balance between device characteristics. Finally, the presently existing problems and future development directions of Fe-NCFETs are summarized and prospected.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
中国科学院半导体研究所, 半导体集成技术工程研究中心, 北京市半导体微纳集成工程技术研究中心, 北京　100083

2.
中国科学院大学, 材料与光电研究中心, 北京　100049

通信作者: 韩伟华, weihua@semi.ac.cn ; 杨富华, fhyang@semi.ac.cn

基金项目: 国家级-国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2016YFA0200503) 资助的课题( 2016YFA0200503)

Authors and contacts

1.
Engineering Research Center of Semiconductor Integrated Technology, Beijing Engineering Research Center of Semiconductor Micro-Nano Integrated Technology, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China

2.
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Corresponding author: Han Wei-Hua, weihua@semi.ac.cn ; Yang Fu-Hua, fhyang@semi.ac.cn

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Moore G E 1965 Electronics 38 114
[2]	Mori K, Duong A, Richardson W F J 2002 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 49 61 Google Scholar
[3]	Fitzgerald E 2006 US Patent 11 412 262
[4]	Chaudhry A, Kumar M J 2004 IEEE T. Device Ma. Re. 4 99 Google Scholar
[5]	Tsutsui G, Saitoh M, Hiramoto T 2005 IEEE Electr. Device L. 26 836 Google Scholar
[6]	Auth C, Allen C, Blattner A, Bergstrom D, Brazier M, Bost M, Buehler M, Chikarmane V, Ghani T, Glassman T 2012 Symposium on VLSI Technology Honolulu, HI, USA, June 12–14, 2012 p131
[7]	Bae G, Bae D-I, Kang M, Hwang S, Kim S, Seo B, Kwon T, Lee T, Moon C, Choi Y 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1–5, 2018 p28.7.1
[8]	International Roadmap for Devices and Systems 2017 Edition Reports. https://irds.ieee.org/roadmap-2017 [2020-1-11].
[9]	Zhirnov V V, Cavin R K 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 77 Google Scholar
[10]	Woo Young C, Byung-Gook P, Jong Duk L, Tsu-Jae King L 2007 IEEE Electr. Device L. 28 743 Google Scholar
[11]	Seabaugh A C, Zhang Q 2010 Proc. IEEE 98 2095 Google Scholar
[12]	Ionescu A M, Riel H 2011 Nature 479 329 Google Scholar
[13]	Mori T, Morita Y, Miyata N, Migita S, Fukuda K, Mizubayashi W, Masahara M, Yasuda T, Ota H 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 083501 Google Scholar
[14]	Gopalakrishnan K, Griffin P B, Plummer J D 2003 Digest. International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 8–11, 2002 p289
[15]	Kam H, Lee D T, Howe R T, King T J 2006 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2005. IEDM Technical Digest. Washington, DC, USA, December 5–5, 2005 p463
[16]	Lefter M, Enachescu M, Voicu G R, Cotofana S D 2014 Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures Paris, France, July 15–17, 2014 p151
[17]	Enachescu M, Lefter M, Voicu G R, Cotofana S D 2018 IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 6 184 Google Scholar
[18]	Luong G V, Narimani K, Tiedemann A T, Bernardy P, Trellenkamp S, Zhao Q T, Mantl S 2016 IEEE Electr. Device L. 37 950 Google Scholar
[19]	Kumar M J, Maheedhar M, Varma P P 2015 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 62 4345 Google Scholar
[20]	Enachescu M, Voicu G R, Cotofana S D 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems Seoul, South Korea, May 23–25, 2012 p2561
[21]	Wei S, Zhang G, Liu J, Huang H, Geng L, Shao Z, Yang C F 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI) Sapporo, Japan, May 13–17, 2017 p1293
[22]	Colinge J P, Lee C W, Afzalian A, Akhavan N D, Yan R, Ferain I, Razavi P, O'Neill B, Blake A, White M, Kelleher A M, McCarthy B, Murphy R 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 225 Google Scholar
[23]	Wang H, Han W, Li X, Zhang Y, Yang F 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 124505 Google Scholar
[24]	Salahuddin S, Datta S J 2008 Nano Lett. 8 405 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhou H, Kwon D, Sachid A B, Liao Y, Chatterjee K, Tan A J, Yadav A K, Hu C, Salahuddin S 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology Honolulu, HI, USA, June 18–22, 2018 p53
[26]	Kobayashi M 2018 Appl. Phys. Express 11 110101 Google Scholar
[27]	Tan A J, Zhu Z, Choe H S, Hu C, Salahuddin S, Yoon A 2019 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application Hsinchu, Taiwan, China, April 22–25, 2019 p1
[28]	Das S, Appenzeller J 2011 Nano Lett. 11 4003 Google Scholar
[29]	Wang X, Yu P, Lei Z, Zhu C, Cao X, Liu F, You L, Zeng Q, Deng Y, Zhu C, Zhou J, Fu Q, Wang J, Huang Y, Liu Z 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3037 Google Scholar
[30]	Xu J, Jiang S Y, Zhang M, Zhu H, Chen L, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 103104 Google Scholar
[31]	Rusu A, Salvatore G A, Jiménez D, Ionescu A M 2010 International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 6–8, 2010 p16.3.1
[32]	Hu C, Salahuddin S, Lin C I, Khan A 2015 73rd Annual Device Research Conference Columbus, OH, USA, June 21–24, 2015 p39
[33]	McGuire F A, Lin Y C, Price K, Rayner G B, Khandelwal S, Salahuddin S, Franklin A D 2017 Nano Lett. 17 4801 Google Scholar
[34]	Pahwa G, Agarwal A, Chauhan Y S 2018 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 65 5130 Google Scholar
[35]	Mehta H, Kaur H 2019 4th International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems Coimbatore, India, March 16–17, 2018 p164
[36]	Mehta H, Kaur H 2018 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 65 2699 Google Scholar
[37]	Shao Q, Wang X, Jiang W, Chen Y, Zhang X, Tu L, Lin T, Shen H, Meng X, Liu A, Wang J 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 162902 Google Scholar
[38]	Fan C C, Tu C Y, Lin M H, Chang C Y, Cheng C H, Chen Y L, Liou G L, Liu C, Chou W C, Hsu H H 2018 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Burlingame, CA, USA, March 11–15, 2018 pP-TX.8-1
[39]	钟维烈 1996 铁电体物理学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第1页 Zhong W L 1996 Ferroelectric Physics (Beijing: Science Press) p1 (in Chinese)
[40]	Kholkin A L, Pertsev N A, Goltsev A V 2008 Piezoelectricity and Crystal Symmetry (Boston: Springer US) pp28–29
[41]	Koh J H 2002 Ph. D. Dissertation (Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology)
[42]	Wersing W, Bruchhaus R 2000 Pyroelectric Devices and Applications (Cambridge: Academic Press) p143
[43]	Sawaguchi E, Akishige Y, Kobayashi M 1985 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54 480 Google Scholar
[44]	Lu S W, Lee B I, Wang Z L, Samuels W D 2000 J. Cryst. Growth 219 269 Google Scholar
[45]	Smith M B, Page K, Siegrist T, Redmond P L, Walter E C, Seshadri R, Brus L E, Steigerwald M L 2008 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 6955 Google Scholar
[46]	Valasek J 1921 Phys. Rev. 17 475 Google Scholar
[47]	Ploss B, Ploss B, Shin F G, Chan H L, Choy C L 2000 IEEE Trns. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 7 517 Google Scholar
[48]	Nguyen C A, Mhaisalkar S G, Ma J, Lee P S 2008 Org. Electron. 9 1087 Google Scholar
[49]	Kang S J, Park Y J, Bae I, Kim K J, Kim H C, Bauer S, Thomas E L, Park C 2009 Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 2812 Google Scholar
[50]	Jo J, Choi W Y, Park J D, Shim J W, Yu H Y, Shin C 2015 Nano Lett. 15 4553 Google Scholar
[51]	Zhang W, Xiong R G 2012 Chem. Rev. 112 1163 Google Scholar
[52]	Liu Y L, Ge J Z, Wang Z X, Xiong R G 2019 Inorg. Chem. Front. 7 128 Google Scholar
[53]	Ikeda T, Sasaki T, Ichimura K 1993 Nature 361 428 Google Scholar
[54]	Zhang H, Chen Y, Ding S, Wang J, Bao W, Zhang D W, Zhou P 2018 Nanotechnology 29 244004 Google Scholar
[55]	Beresnev L A, Chigrinov V G, Dergachev D I, Poshidaev E P, Fünfschilling J, Schadt M 1989 Liq. Cryst. 5 1171 Google Scholar
[56]	Ye H Y, Tang Y Y, Li P F, Liao W Q, Gao J X, Hua X N, Cai H, Shi P P, You Y M, Xiong R G J S 2018 Science 361 151 Google Scholar
[57]	Li P F, Liao W Q, Tang Y Y, Qiao W, Zhao D, Ai Y, Yao Y F, Xiong R G 2019 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S.A 116 5878 Google Scholar
[58]	Li L, Wu M 2017 ACS Nano 11 6382 Google Scholar
[59]	Ding W, Zhu J, Wang Z, Gao Y, Xiao D, Gu Y, Zhang Z, Zhu W 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14956 Google Scholar
[60]	Li Y, Gong M, Zeng H 2019 J. Semicond. 40 061002s Google Scholar
[61]	Liu F, You L, Seyler K L, Li X, Yu P, Lin J, Wang X, Zhou J, Wang H, He H, Pantelides S T, Zhou W, Sharma P, Xu X, Ajayan P M, Wang J, Liu Z 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12357 Google Scholar
[62]	Wu M, Jena P 2018 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Comput. Mol. Sci. 8 1365 Google Scholar
[63]	Böscke T S, Müller J, Bräuhaus D, Schröder U, Böttger U 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 102903 Google Scholar
[64]	Mueller S, Mueller J, Singh A, Riedel S, Sundqvist J, Schroeder U, Mikolajick T 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 2412 Google Scholar
[65]	Müller J, Schröder U, Böscke T S, Müller I, Böttger U, Wilde L, Sundqvist J, Lemberger M, Kücher P, Mikolajick T, Frey L 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 114113 Google Scholar
[66]	Starschich S, Boettger U 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 333 Google Scholar
[67]	Schroeder U, Mueller S, Mueller J, Yurchuk E, Martin D, Adelmann C, Schloesser T, van Bentum R, Mikolajick T 2013 ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2 N69 Google Scholar
[68]	Schroeder U, Yurchuk E, Müller J, Martin D, Schenk T, Polakowski P, Adelmann C, Popovici M I, Kalinin S V, Mikolajick T 2014 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53 08LE02 Google Scholar
[69]	Müller J, Böscke T S, Bräuhaus D, Schröder U, Böttger U, Sundqvist J, Kücher P, Mikolajick T, Frey L 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 112901 Google Scholar
[70]	Müller J, Boscke T S, Schroder U, Mueller S, Brauhaus D, Bottger U, Frey L, Mikolajick T 2012 Nano Lett. 12 4318 Google Scholar
[71]	Terki R, Bertrand G, Aourag H, Coddet C 2008 Mater. Lett. 62 1484 Google Scholar
[72]	Íñiguez J, Zubko P, Luk’yanchuk I, Cano A 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 243 Google Scholar
[73]	Sayeef S, Supriyo D 2008 Nano Letter 8 405
[74]	Lu P S, Lin C C, Su P 2019 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application Hsinchu, Taiwan, China, April 22–25, 2019 p1
[75]	Muller J, Boscke T S, Schroder U, Hoffmann R, Mikolajick T, Frey L 2012 IEEE Electr. Device L. 33 185 Google Scholar
[76]	Pahwa G, Dutta T, Agarwal A, Chauhan Y S 2017 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 64 1366 Google Scholar
[77]	Park B E, Lee G G 2010 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 56 1484 Google Scholar
[78]	Sun J, Zheng X 2011 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 58 3559 Google Scholar
[79]	Sun J, Zheng X J, Li W 2012 Curr. Appl. Phys. 12 760 Google Scholar
[80]	Jang K, Kobayashi M, Hiramoto T 2018 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57 114202 Google Scholar
[81]	Li Y, Lian Y, Samudra G S 2015 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 30 045011 Google Scholar
[82]	Sun J, Li Y, Cao L 2019 J. Comput. Electron. 18 527 Google Scholar
[83]	Hoffmann M, Pesic M, Slesazeck S, Schroeder U, Mikolajick T 2018 Nanoscale 10 10891 Google Scholar
[84]	Cheng C H, Fan C C, Tu C Y, Hsu H H, Chang C Y 2019 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 66 825 Google Scholar
[85]	Wong J C, Salahuddin S 2019 Proc. IEEE 107 49 Google Scholar
[86]	Luttinger J M, Tisza L 1946 Phys. Rev. 70 954 Google Scholar
[87]	Slater J C 1950 Phys. Rev. 78 748 Google Scholar
[88]	Islam Khan A, Bhowmik D, Yu P, Joo Kim S, Pan X, Ramesh R, Salahuddin S 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 113501 Google Scholar
[89]	Rabe K M, Dawber M, Lichtensteiger C, Ahn C H, Triscone J-M 2007 Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg) pp1–30
[90]	Gao W, Khan A, Marti X, Nelson C, Serrao C, Ravichandran J, Ramesh R, Salahuddin S 2014 Nano Lett. 14 5814 Google Scholar
[91]	Alam M A, Si M, Ye P D 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 090401 Google Scholar
[92]	Liu Z, Bhuiyan M, Ma T 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1–5, 2018 p31.2.1
[93]	Hoffmann M, Slesazeck S, Mikolajick T, Hwang C S 2019 Ferroelectricity in Doped Hafnium Oxide: Materials, Properties and Devices (Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing) p473
[94]	Khan A I, Chatterjee K, Wang B, Drapcho S, You L, Serrao C, Bakaul S R, Ramesh R, Salahuddin S 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 182 Google Scholar
[95]	Jang K, Ueyama N, Kobayashi M, Hiramoto T 2018 IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 6 346 Google Scholar
[96]	Kim K D, Kim Y J, Park M H, Park H W, Kwon Y J, Lee Y B, Kim H J, Moon T, Lee Y H, Hyun S D, Kim B S, Hwang C S 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1808228 Google Scholar
[97]	Han Q, Aleksa P, Tromm T C U, Schubert J, Mantl S, Zhao Q T 2019 Solid-State Electron. 159 71 Google Scholar
[98]	Catalan G, Jiménez D, Gruverman A 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 137 Google Scholar
[99]	Chang S C, Avci U E, Nikonov D E, Manipatruni S, Young I A 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 9 014010 Google Scholar
[100]	Landau L, Khalatnikov I 1954 Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 96 469 Google Scholar
[101]	Hoffmann M, Khan A I, Serrao C, Lu Z, Salahuddin S, Pešić M, Slesazeck S, Schroeder U, Mikolajick T 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 123 184101 Google Scholar
[102]	Merz W J 1954 Phys. Rev. 95 690 Google Scholar
[103]	Chang S-C, Avci U E, Nikonov D E, Young I A 2017 IEEE J. Explor. Solid-State Comput. Devices Circuits 3 56 Google Scholar
[104]	Jin C, Saraya T, Hiramoto T, Kobayashi M 2019 IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 7 368 Google Scholar
[105]	Wang H, Yang M, Huang Q, Zhu K, Zhao Y, Liang Z, Chen C, Wang Z, Zhong Y, Zhang X 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1–5, 2018 p31.1.1
[106]	Orihara H, Hashimoto S, Ishibashi Y 1994 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63 1031 Google Scholar
[107]	Jo J, Shin C 2016 IEEE Electr. Device L. 37 245 Google Scholar
[108]	Nourbakhsh A, Zubair A, Joglekar S, Dresselhaus M, Palacios T 2017 Nanoscale 9 6122 Google Scholar
[109]	Saeidi A, Jazaeri F, Bellando F, Stolichnov I, Enz C C, Ionescu A M 2017 47th European Solid-State Device Research Conference Leuven, Belgium, September 11–14, 2017 p78
[110]	Galatage R, Bentley S, Suvarna P H, Krivokapic Z 2018 US Patent 10 141 414 B1
[111]	Khan A I, Yeung C W, Hu C, Salahuddin S 2012 International Electron Devices Meeting Washington, DC, USA, December 5–7, 2011 p11.3.1
[112]	Agarwal H, Kushwaha P, Lin Y K, Kao M Y, Liao Y H, Dasgupta A, Salahuddin S, Hu C 2019 IEEE Electr. Device L. 40 463 Google Scholar
[113]	Si M, Su C J, Jiang C, Conrad N J, Zhou H, Maize K D, Qiu G, Wu C T, Shakouri A, Alam M A, Ye P D 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 24 Google Scholar
[114]	Bohr M T, Young I A 2017 IEEE Micro 37 20
[115]	Cheng C H, Chin A 2014 IEEE Electr.Device L. 35 274 Google Scholar
[116]	Fan CC, Cheng CH, Chen YR, Liu C, Chang CY 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 2–6, 2017 p23.2.1
[117]	Chiu YC, Cheng CH, Chang C-, Tang YT, Chen MC 2016 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology Honolulu, HI, USA, June 14–16, 2016 p1
[118]	Cheng CH, Fan CC, Hsu HH, Wang SA, Chang CY 2019 Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 13 1800493 Google Scholar
[119]	Cheng C H, Lin M H, Chen H Y, Fan C C, Liu C, Hsu H H, Chang C Y 2018 Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 13 1800573 Google Scholar
[120]	Zeng B, Xiao W, Liao J, Liu H, Liao M, Peng Q, Zheng S, Zhou Y 2018 IEEE Electr. Device L. 39 1508 Google Scholar
[121]	Chen K T, Liao C Y, Chen H Y, Lo C, Siang G Y, Lin Y Y, Tseng Y J, Chang C, Chueh C Y, Yang Y J, Liao M H, Li K S, Chang S T, Lee M H 2019 Microelectron. Eng. 215 110991 Google Scholar
[122]	Xiao W, Liu C, Peng Y, Zheng S, Feng Q, Zhang C, Zhang J, Hao Y, Liao M, Zhou Y 2019 IEEE Electr. Device L. 40 714 Google Scholar
[123]	Li K S, Chen P G, Lai T Y, Lin C H, Cheng C C, Chen C C, Wei Y J, Hou Y F, Liao M H, Lee M H 2016 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Washington, DC, USA, December 7–9, 2015 p22.6.1
[124]	Zhang Z, Xu G, Zhang Q, Hou Z, Li J, Kong Z, Zhang Y, Xiang J, Xu Q, Wu Z, Zhu H, Yin H, Wang W, Ye T 2019 IEEE Electr. Device L. 40 367 Google Scholar
[125]	Chen P J, Tsai M J, Hou F J, Wu Y C 2019 Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop Kyoto, Japan, June 9–10, 2019 p1
[126]	Lee S Y, Chen H W, Shen C H, Kuo P Y, Chung C C, Huang Y E, Chen H Y, Chao T S 2019 IEEE Electr. Device L. 40 1708 Google Scholar
[127]	Bansal A K, Kumar M, Gupta C, Hook T B, Dixit A 2018 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 65 3548 Google Scholar
[128]	Song Y, Zhou H, Xu Q, Luo J, Yin H, Yan J, Zhong H 2011 J. Electron. Mater. 40 1584 Google Scholar
[129]	Zhou J, Han G, Li Q, Peng Y, Lu X, Zhang C, Zhang J, Sun QQ, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 3–7, 2016 p12.2.1
[130]	Zhou J, Han G, Peng Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2017 IEEE Electr. Device L. 38 1157 Google Scholar
[131]	Li J, Zhou J, Han G, Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhang J, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2017 IEEE Electr. Device L. 38 1500 Google Scholar
[132]	Zhou J, Han G, Li J, Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhang J, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2018 IEEE Electr.Device L. 39 622 Google Scholar
[133]	Zhou J, Han G, Li J, Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhang J, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2018 IEEE Electr. Device L. 39 618 Google Scholar
[134]	Peng Y, Liu Y, Han G, Zhang J, Hao Y 2019 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14 125 Google Scholar
[135]	Alghamdi S, Chung W, Si M, Peide D Y 2018 76th Device Research Conference Santa Barbara, CA, USA, June 24–27, 2018 p1
[136]	Luc Q, Fan-Chiang C, Huynh S, Huang P, Do H, Ha M, Jin Y, Nguyen T, Zhang K, Wang H 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology Honolulu, HI, USA, June 18–22, 2018 p47
[137]	Chang E Y, Luc Q H, Tran N A, Lin Y C 2019 ECS Trans. 92 3 Google Scholar
[138]	Srimani T, Hills G, Bishop M D, Radhakrishna U, Zubair A, Park R S, Stein Y, Palacios T, Antoniadis D, Shulaker M M 2018 IEEE Electr. Device L. 39 304 Google Scholar
[139]	Tu L, Wang X, Wang J, Meng X, Chu J 2018 Adv. Electron. Mater. 4 1800231 Google Scholar
[140]	Si M, Jiang C, Chung W, Du Y, Alam M A, Ye P D 2018 Nano Lett. 18 3682 Google Scholar
[141]	Lee Y T, Kwon H, Kim J S, Kim H H, Lee Y J, Lim J A, Song YW, Yi Y, Choi WK, Hwang D K 2015 ACS Nano 9 10394 Google Scholar
[142]	Heidler J, Yang S, Feng X, Müllen K, Asadi K 2018 Solid-State Electron. 144 90 Google Scholar
[143]	Choi H, Shin C 2019 Phys. Status Solidi A 216 1900177 Google Scholar
[144]	Yu Z, Wang H, Li W, Xu S, Song X, Wang S, Wang P, Zhou P, Shi Y, Chai Y 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 2-6, 2017 p23.6.1
[145]	Yap W C, Jiang H, Liu J, Xia Q, Zhu W 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 013103 Google Scholar
[146]	McGuire F A, Lin Y C, Rayner B, Franklin A D 2017 75th Annual Device Research Conference South Bend, IN, USA, June 25–28, 2017 p1
[147]	Alghamdi S, Si M, Yang L, Peide D Y 2018 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Burlingame, CA, USA, March 11–15, 2018 pP-TX.1-1
[148]	Wang J, Guo X, Yu Z, Ma Z, Liu Y, Chan M, Zhu Y, Wang X, Chai Y 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1–5, 2018 p22.3.1
[149]	Si M, Peide D Y 2018 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application Hsinchu, Taiwan, April 16–19, 2018 p1
[150]	Liu F, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Liu X, Wang J, Guo H 2016 NPJ Quantum Mater. 1 16004 Google Scholar
[151]	Park N, Kang H, Park J, Lee Y, Yun Y, Lee J H, Lee S G, Lee Y H, Suh D 2015 ACS Nano 9 10729 Google Scholar
[152]	Jie W, Hao J 2017 Nanoscale 10 328
[153]	Lipatov A, Fursina A, Vo T H, Sharma P, Gruverman A, Sinitskii A 2017 Adv. Electron. Mater. 3 1700020 Google Scholar
[154]	Lee Y, Jeon W, Cho Y, Lee M H, Jeong S J, Park J, Park S 2016 ACS Nano 10 6659 Google Scholar
[155]	Tian H, Li Y-x, Li L, Wang X, Liang R, Yang Y, Ren T L 2019 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 66 1579 Google Scholar
[156]	Li J, Liu Y, Han G, Zhou J, Hao Y 2019 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14 171 Google Scholar
[157]	Peng Y, Han G, Xiao W, Wu J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Hao Y 2019 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14 115 Google Scholar
[158]	Tokumitsu E 2020 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 59 SCCB06 Google Scholar
[159]	Park J H, Jang G S, Kim H Y, Seok K H, Chae H J, Lee S K, Joo S K 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 24734 Google Scholar
[160]	Lee M H, Fan S T, Tang C H, Chen P G, Chou Y C, Chen H H, Kuo J Y, Xie M J, Liu S N, Liao M H 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 3–7, 2016 p12.1.1
[161]	Zhang X D, Han W H, Liu W, Zhao X S, Guo Y Y, Yang C, Chen J D, Yang F H 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 127302 Google Scholar
[162]	Guo Y Y, Han W H, Zhao X S, Dou Y M, Zhang X D, Wu X Y, Yang F H 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 107303 Google Scholar
[163]	Zhao X S, Han W H, Guo Y Y, Dou Y M, Yang F H 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 097310 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 IRDS提出的SS路线图^[8]

Fig. 1. Roadmap of subthreshold swing (SS) proposed by IRDS^[8].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 介电体分类示意图

Fig. 2. The schematic diagram of the classification of dielectrics.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 铁电电滞回线^[41]

Fig. 3. Ferroelectric hysteresis loop^[41].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 有机钙钛矿A(NH₄)X₃家族化学和晶格结构^[56]　(a) 有机钙钛矿铁电体的三维化学结构组成图; (b) 铁电相MDABCO-NH₄I₃在293 K时的晶胞结构图, 右侧椭圆中为有机正离子的空间结构示意图, 其对称性接近于球体; (c) 铁电相MDABCO-NH₄I₃在463 K时的晶胞结构图

Fig. 4. Chemical and crystal structures of the metal-free A(NH₄) X₃ family^[56]: (a) Chemical structures of constituents of the metal-free 3D perovskite ferroelectrics; (b) the packing diagram of MDABCO–NH₄I₃ in the ferroelectric phase at 293 K. The oval to the right contains the space-fill diagram of the organic cation, showing the cationic geometry to be close to a ball; (c) the packing diagram of MDABCO–NH₄I₃ in the paraelectric phase at 463 K.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 场效应晶体管转移特性曲线

Fig. 5. The transfer characteristic curve of field effect transistors.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 标准场效应晶体管结构示意图与其等效电容电路^[73]

Fig. 6. The schematic diagram of a standard field effect transistors.structure and its eauivalent circuit of capacitance^[73].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 器件结构图　(a) 传统MOSFETs; (b) MFIS; (c) MFMIS

Fig. 7. Device structure diagram: (a) Traditional MOSFETs; (b) MFIS; (c) MFMIS.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 (a) 钙钛矿型(ABO₃)铁电体的晶胞结构图^[85]; (b) (200)晶面的极化场分布图^[85]

Fig. 8. (a) Conventional unit cell of an FE perovskite (ABO₃)^[85]; (b) schematic of the dipole fields in the (200) plane^[85].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 铁电体极化强度P和电场E之间的关系　(a) P-E关系图; (b) 电滞回线图

Fig. 9. The relationship between polarization P and electric field E of ferroelectrics: (a) P vs. E; (b) hysteresis diagram.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 (a) 铁电体的Q_FE-V_FE关系图; (b)铁电体的U_FE-Q_FE关系图

Fig. 10. (a) Q_FE vs. V_FE of ferroelectrics; (b) U_FE vs. Q_FE of ferroelectrics.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同电容系统的自由能曲线形貌^[90]

Fig. 11. Energy landscapes of C_FE, C_DE and their series combination^[90].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 小信号测量模式测量铁电体NC　(a) 等效电路图^[91]; (b) LAO/BSTO超晶格结构示意图^[90]; (c) 电容与电压的关系^[90]

Fig. 12. Ferroelectric NC measured by small-signal measurement mode: (a) Equivalent circuit diagram^[91]; (b) schematic diagram of a LAO/BSTO superlattice stack^[90]; (c) capacitance dependence on voltage^[90].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 测量铁电体瞬态NC的R-C_FE等效电路图^[99]

Fig. 13. The schematic of a R-C_FE circuit for studying the transient NC in ferroelectrics^[99].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 瞬态NC模拟结果^[99]　(a) 输入电压, 输出电压和铁电电容上自由电荷与时间的关系图; (b) 极化强度和自由电荷与时间的关系图; (c) 极化强度和自由电荷对时间的微分结果及其差值随时间的变化曲线; (d) 铁电电容电压的变化速度随时间的变化曲线

Fig. 14. The simulation results of transient NC^[99]: (a) Input voltage, output voltage, and free charge on a ferroelectric capacitor as functions of time; (b) polarization and free charge as functions of time; (c) charge density per unit time for free charge and polarization and the difference between them; (d) change in the voltage across a ferroelectric capacitor per unit time as a function of time.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 (a) 外电阻对R-C_FE电路中瞬态NC的影响; (b) 粘度系数对R-C_FE电路中瞬态NC的影响^[99]

Fig. 15. (a) The effect of the external resistance on transient NC in a R-C_FE circuit; (b)the effect of the viscosity coefficient on transient NC in a R-C_FE circuit^[99].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 器件电容电荷量与电压的关系　(a) 电容模型; (b) ${C_{\rm{S}}} < \left| {{C_{{\rm{FE}}}}} \right|$; (c) ${C_{\rm{S}}} < \left| {{C_{{\rm{FE}}}}} \right|$; (d) Fe-NCFETs^[91]; (e) Fe-FET^[91]

Fig. 16. The relationship between capacitive charge and voltage of the device: (a) Capacitance model; (b) ${C_{\rm{S}}} < \left| {{C_{{\rm{FE}}}}} \right|$; (c) ${C_{\rm{S}}} < \left| {{C_{{\rm{FE}}}}} \right|$ (d) Fe-NCFETs^[91]; (e) Fe-FETs^[91].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 平面型硅基- HfAlO Fe-NCFETs^[116]　(a) 器件截面透射电子显微镜(transmission electron microscope, TEM)图; (b) 剩余极化强度与TaN中N含量的关系曲线; (c) F离子钝化作用对铁电层能带影响的示意图; (d) 不同处理作用后器件的SS与源漏电压的关系

Fig. 17. Planar Silicon based HfAlO Fe-NCFETs^[116]: (a) HR TEM cross-section image; (b) polarization as a function of nitrogen content of TaN; (c) schematic band diagram of HfAlO before and after F-passivation; (d) SS as a function of V_DS after different treatments.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 硅基NCFinFET^[123]　(a) 器件截面TEM图; (b) 铁电NCFinFET的栅压放大系数与栅压的关系曲线; (c) 常规FinFET和铁电NCFinFET的SS与栅压的关系曲线

Fig. 18. Silicon based NC-FinFET^[123]: (a) TEM cross-sectional image of NC-FinFET with TiN internal gate, HfZrO FE film and TiN gate; (b) the gate amplification coefficient as a function of V_G for NC-FinFET; (c) SS as a function of V_G for conventional FinFET and NC-FinFET.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 (a)硅基铁电NCp-FinFET截面TEM图^[124]; (b) 源漏电流与栅长关系曲线^[124]

Fig. 19. (a) TEM cross-sectional image of silicon based NC-p-FinFET^[124]; (b) I_DS as a function of gate length^[124].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 双层堆叠硅纳米线GAA结构Fe-NCFETs^[126]　(a) 器件截面TEM图; (b) 沟道部分高分辨率TEM图; (c) HZO层的掠入角XRD曲线

Fig. 20. Two-layer stacked silicon nanowire GAA Fe-NCFETs^[126] : (a) TEM cross-sectional image of the device; (b) HRTEM of a portion of the channel; (c) the GIXRD spectrum for the as-deposited HZO layer.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 21 Ge基- HZO NCP型晶体管^[129]　(a) Ge沟道器件结构示意图; (b) Ge-Sn沟道器件结构示意图; (c) Ge沟道器件转移特性曲线; (d) Ge-Sn沟道器件转移特性曲线

Fig. 21. Germanium based HZO NC-pFET^[129]: (a) Schematic diagram of the device with Ge channel; (b) schematic diagram of the device with Ge-Sn channel; (c) transfer characteristic curve of the device with Ge channel; (d) transfer characteristic curve of the device with Ge-Sn channel.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 22 锗纳米线Fe-NCFETs^[135]　(a) 栅压扫描范围为 ±5 V时在不同扫描时间下的转移特性曲线; (b) 栅压扫描范围为 ±5 V时的回滞电压与扫描时间关系曲线; (c) 不同栅压扫描范围下的I_{D, Max}与扫描时间关系曲线

Fig. 22. Germanium nanowire NC-pFET^[135]: (a) The transfer characteristic curve at different sweep times for ±5 V sweep range; (b) hysteresis versus sweep time for ±5 V sweep range; (c) maximum drain current versus sweep time for different sweep ranges.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 23 In_0.53Ga_0.47As沟道Fe-NCFETs　(a) 平面型器件的结构示意图^[136]; (b) Fin结构器件的结构示意图平^[137]; (c) 平面型器件的转移特性曲线^[136]; (d) Fin结构器件的转移特性曲线^[137]

Fig. 23. In_0.53Ga_0.47As channel Fe-NCFETs: (a) Schematic diagram^[136] and (c) transfer characteristic curve of planar device^[136]; (b) schematic diagram^[137] and (d) transfer characteristic curve of Fin device^[137].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 24 碳纳米管Fe-NCFETs^[138]　(a) 器件横截面TEM图; (b) 电滞回线; (c) 转移特性曲线; (d) 栅电流和栅压的关系曲线

Fig. 24. Carbon nanotube Fe-NCFETs^[138]: (a) TEM cross-sectional image; (b) P_r vs. E; (c) the transfer characteristic curve; (d) I_GS as a function of V_GS.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 25 MoS₂铁电NC体晶体管^[145]　(a) 器件结构图; (b) V_G = ± 7 V的转移特性曲线; (c) V_G = ± 10 V时的转移特性曲线

Fig. 25. MoS₂ Fe-NCFETs^[145]: (a) Structure of the device; (b)transfer characteristic curve of V_G = ± 7 V; (c)transfer characteristic curve of V_G = ± 10 V.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 26 WSe₂铁电NC体晶^[140]　(a) MFIS型器件结构图; (b) MFMIS型器件结构图; (c) MFIS型器件的转移特性曲线; (d) MFMIS型器件的转移特性曲线

Fig. 26. WSe₂ Fe-NCFETs^[140]: (a) Structure of MFIS device; (b) structure of MFMIS device; (c) transfer characteristic curve of MFIS device; (d) transfer characteristic curve of MFMIS device.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 27 石墨烯- Hf_xAl_yO₂晶体管^[154]　(a) 在石墨烯/二氧化硅衬底上沉积的Hf_xAl_yO₂薄膜; (b) Hf_xAl_yO₂的相对介电常数; (c) 不同Al组分下Hf_xAl_yO₂三个相的能量差; (d) 转移特性曲线(9.5% Al)

Fig. 27. Graphene-Hf_xAl_yO₂ transistor^[154]: (a) Hf_xAl_yo₂ films deposited on graphene/SiO₂ substrates; (b) relative dielectric constant of Hf_xAl_yO₂; (c) energy difference among three phases in Hf_xAl_yO₂ with different Al concentrations; (d) transfer characteristic curve.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 28 黑磷铁电NC体晶体管^[155]　(a) 器件结构图; (b) 转移特性曲线; (c) 不同I_d下的SS

Fig. 28. Black phosphorus Fe-NCFETs^[155]: (a) Structure of the device; (b) transfer characteristic curve; (c) SS in different I_d.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 29 实验报道的Fe-NCFETs的SS与Hysteresis关系图 (2D^{[30,33,108,140,144,146-148,155]}, Si^{[25,116,118,119,121,123-126]}, GeSn^{[129,130,134,156]}, InGaAs^[136,137])

Fig. 29. SS versus Hysteresis of the reported Fe-NCFETs (2D^{[30,33,108,140,144,146-148,155]}, Si^{[25,116,118,119,121,123-126]}, GeSn^{[129,130,134,156]}, InGaAs^[136,137]).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 实验报道的Fe-NCFETs的性能参数对比

Table 1. Performance comparison of the reported Fe-NCFETs.

MOS structure	Channel materials	Gate structure	Ferroelectric materials	t_FE/nm	SS_min/ (mV·dec^–1)	Hysteresis/V	Orders of I_DS	V_D/V	I_ON/I_OFF	Year	Ref.
Planar	p-Si	MFIS	Hf_0.65Zr_0.35O₂	30	5	—	—	–0.5	10⁴	2014	^[115]
Planar	n-Si	MFIS	HfAlO (Al: 6%)	10	Sub-25	0.02	4	0.2	10⁸	2017	^[116]
Planar	n-Si	MFIS	Hf_0.75Zr_0.25O₂	10	40	Free	1	0.2	10⁷	2018	^[119]
Planar	n-Si	MFIS	Hf_0.53Zr_0.47O₂	5	~40	~0.1	2	0.2	10⁷	2019	^[121]
Planar	n-Si	MFIS	HfAlO (Al: 4%)	10	Sub-30	0.02	4	0.2	10⁸	2019	^[118]
FinFET	n-Si	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	4	Sub-30	0.003	2	0.05	10⁷	2018	^[25]
FinFET	n-Si	MFMIS	Hf_0.42Zr_0.58O₂	5	58	0.003	1	0.1	10⁵	2015	^[123]
FinFET	n-Si	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	5	Sub-60	Free	—	0.1	10⁷	2019	^[125]
FinFET	p-Si	MFMIS	Hf_0.42Zr_0.58O₂	3	34.5	0.009	2	–0.05	10⁴	2019	^[124]
FinFET	n-Si	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	5	Sub-60	Free	—	0.1	10⁷	2019	^[125]
GAA	poly n-Si	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	10	26.84	0.003	4	0.1	10⁸	2019	^[126]
Planar	p-Ge	MFMIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	6.5	43	2.34	1	–0.05	10³	2016	^[129]
Planar	p-GeSn	MFMIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	6.5	40	0.41	2	–0.05	10³	2016	^[129]
Planar	p-GeSn	MFMIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	6	Sub-20	< 0.01	2	–0.05	10⁴	2017	^[130]
Planar	p-Ge	MFMIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	4.5	~87.5	Free	—	–0.05	10³	2019	^[156]
Planar	p-Ge	MFIS	Hf_0.67Zr_0.33O₂	7	~125	~0.105	—	–0.5	10⁴	2019	^[134]
Planar	n-InGaAs	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	8	23	~0.2	3	0.05	10⁵	2018	^[136]
FinFET	n-InGaAs	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	5	23	0.2	1	0.05	10³	2019	^[137]
GAA	nanotube	MFMIS	HfAlO(Al: 7%)	10	~45	—	—	0.05	10⁴	2018	^[138]
2D-FET	MoS₂	MFMIS	Hf_1-xZr_xO₂	15	Sub-60	1.2	3	0.5	10⁵	2017	^[146]
2D-FET	MoS₂	MFMIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	15	6.07	0.5	4	0.5	10⁵	2017	^[33]
2D-FET	MoS₂	MFMIS	HfAlO(Al:7.3%)	10	57	0.5	4	0.5	10⁵	2017	^[108]
2D-FET	MoS₂	MFMIS	HfZrO_x	15	47	2.5	1	0.1	10⁶	2018	^[30]
2D-FET	MoS₂	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	20	Sub-60	< 0.005	4	0.5	10⁶	2018	^[147]
2D-FET	MoS₂	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	20	23	0.077	6	0.1	10⁹	2017	^[144]
2D-FET	WSe₂	MFMIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	20	14.4	0.12	2	–0.1	10⁵	2018	^[140]
2D-FET	WSe₂	MFIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	10	18.2	0.02	4	–0.1	10⁴	2018	^[148]
2D-FET	Graphene	MFS	HfAlO(Al:9.5%)	5	—	—	—	0.1	2.75	2016	^[154]
2D-FET	BP	MFMIS	Hf_0.5Zr_0.5O₂	20	104	0.5	—	0.1	10²	2019	^[155]

下载: 导出CSV

[1]	Moore G E 1965 Electronics 38 114
[2]	Mori K, Duong A, Richardson W F J 2002 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 49 61 Google Scholar
[3]	Fitzgerald E 2006 US Patent 11 412 262
[4]	Chaudhry A, Kumar M J 2004 IEEE T. Device Ma. Re. 4 99 Google Scholar
[5]	Tsutsui G, Saitoh M, Hiramoto T 2005 IEEE Electr. Device L. 26 836 Google Scholar
[6]	Auth C, Allen C, Blattner A, Bergstrom D, Brazier M, Bost M, Buehler M, Chikarmane V, Ghani T, Glassman T 2012 Symposium on VLSI Technology Honolulu, HI, USA, June 12–14, 2012 p131
[7]	Bae G, Bae D-I, Kang M, Hwang S, Kim S, Seo B, Kwon T, Lee T, Moon C, Choi Y 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1–5, 2018 p28.7.1
[8]	International Roadmap for Devices and Systems 2017 Edition Reports. https://irds.ieee.org/roadmap-2017 [2020-1-11].
[9]	Zhirnov V V, Cavin R K 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 77 Google Scholar
[10]	Woo Young C, Byung-Gook P, Jong Duk L, Tsu-Jae King L 2007 IEEE Electr. Device L. 28 743 Google Scholar
[11]	Seabaugh A C, Zhang Q 2010 Proc. IEEE 98 2095 Google Scholar
[12]	Ionescu A M, Riel H 2011 Nature 479 329 Google Scholar
[13]	Mori T, Morita Y, Miyata N, Migita S, Fukuda K, Mizubayashi W, Masahara M, Yasuda T, Ota H 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 083501 Google Scholar
[14]	Gopalakrishnan K, Griffin P B, Plummer J D 2003 Digest. International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 8–11, 2002 p289
[15]	Kam H, Lee D T, Howe R T, King T J 2006 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2005. IEDM Technical Digest. Washington, DC, USA, December 5–5, 2005 p463
[16]	Lefter M, Enachescu M, Voicu G R, Cotofana S D 2014 Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures Paris, France, July 15–17, 2014 p151
[17]	Enachescu M, Lefter M, Voicu G R, Cotofana S D 2018 IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 6 184 Google Scholar
[18]	Luong G V, Narimani K, Tiedemann A T, Bernardy P, Trellenkamp S, Zhao Q T, Mantl S 2016 IEEE Electr. Device L. 37 950 Google Scholar
[19]	Kumar M J, Maheedhar M, Varma P P 2015 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 62 4345 Google Scholar
[20]	Enachescu M, Voicu G R, Cotofana S D 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems Seoul, South Korea, May 23–25, 2012 p2561
[21]	Wei S, Zhang G, Liu J, Huang H, Geng L, Shao Z, Yang C F 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI) Sapporo, Japan, May 13–17, 2017 p1293
[22]	Colinge J P, Lee C W, Afzalian A, Akhavan N D, Yan R, Ferain I, Razavi P, O'Neill B, Blake A, White M, Kelleher A M, McCarthy B, Murphy R 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 225 Google Scholar
[23]	Wang H, Han W, Li X, Zhang Y, Yang F 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 124505 Google Scholar
[24]	Salahuddin S, Datta S J 2008 Nano Lett. 8 405 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhou H, Kwon D, Sachid A B, Liao Y, Chatterjee K, Tan A J, Yadav A K, Hu C, Salahuddin S 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology Honolulu, HI, USA, June 18–22, 2018 p53
[26]	Kobayashi M 2018 Appl. Phys. Express 11 110101 Google Scholar
[27]	Tan A J, Zhu Z, Choe H S, Hu C, Salahuddin S, Yoon A 2019 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application Hsinchu, Taiwan, China, April 22–25, 2019 p1
[28]	Das S, Appenzeller J 2011 Nano Lett. 11 4003 Google Scholar
[29]	Wang X, Yu P, Lei Z, Zhu C, Cao X, Liu F, You L, Zeng Q, Deng Y, Zhu C, Zhou J, Fu Q, Wang J, Huang Y, Liu Z 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3037 Google Scholar
[30]	Xu J, Jiang S Y, Zhang M, Zhu H, Chen L, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 103104 Google Scholar
[31]	Rusu A, Salvatore G A, Jiménez D, Ionescu A M 2010 International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 6–8, 2010 p16.3.1
[32]	Hu C, Salahuddin S, Lin C I, Khan A 2015 73rd Annual Device Research Conference Columbus, OH, USA, June 21–24, 2015 p39
[33]	McGuire F A, Lin Y C, Price K, Rayner G B, Khandelwal S, Salahuddin S, Franklin A D 2017 Nano Lett. 17 4801 Google Scholar
[34]	Pahwa G, Agarwal A, Chauhan Y S 2018 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 65 5130 Google Scholar
[35]	Mehta H, Kaur H 2019 4th International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems Coimbatore, India, March 16–17, 2018 p164
[36]	Mehta H, Kaur H 2018 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 65 2699 Google Scholar
[37]	Shao Q, Wang X, Jiang W, Chen Y, Zhang X, Tu L, Lin T, Shen H, Meng X, Liu A, Wang J 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 162902 Google Scholar
[38]	Fan C C, Tu C Y, Lin M H, Chang C Y, Cheng C H, Chen Y L, Liou G L, Liu C, Chou W C, Hsu H H 2018 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Burlingame, CA, USA, March 11–15, 2018 pP-TX.8-1
[39]	钟维烈 1996 铁电体物理学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第1页 Zhong W L 1996 Ferroelectric Physics (Beijing: Science Press) p1 (in Chinese)
[40]	Kholkin A L, Pertsev N A, Goltsev A V 2008 Piezoelectricity and Crystal Symmetry (Boston: Springer US) pp28–29
[41]	Koh J H 2002 Ph. D. Dissertation (Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology)
[42]	Wersing W, Bruchhaus R 2000 Pyroelectric Devices and Applications (Cambridge: Academic Press) p143
[43]	Sawaguchi E, Akishige Y, Kobayashi M 1985 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54 480 Google Scholar
[44]	Lu S W, Lee B I, Wang Z L, Samuels W D 2000 J. Cryst. Growth 219 269 Google Scholar
[45]	Smith M B, Page K, Siegrist T, Redmond P L, Walter E C, Seshadri R, Brus L E, Steigerwald M L 2008 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 6955 Google Scholar
[46]	Valasek J 1921 Phys. Rev. 17 475 Google Scholar
[47]	Ploss B, Ploss B, Shin F G, Chan H L, Choy C L 2000 IEEE Trns. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 7 517 Google Scholar
[48]	Nguyen C A, Mhaisalkar S G, Ma J, Lee P S 2008 Org. Electron. 9 1087 Google Scholar
[49]	Kang S J, Park Y J, Bae I, Kim K J, Kim H C, Bauer S, Thomas E L, Park C 2009 Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 2812 Google Scholar
[50]	Jo J, Choi W Y, Park J D, Shim J W, Yu H Y, Shin C 2015 Nano Lett. 15 4553 Google Scholar
[51]	Zhang W, Xiong R G 2012 Chem. Rev. 112 1163 Google Scholar
[52]	Liu Y L, Ge J Z, Wang Z X, Xiong R G 2019 Inorg. Chem. Front. 7 128 Google Scholar
[53]	Ikeda T, Sasaki T, Ichimura K 1993 Nature 361 428 Google Scholar
[54]	Zhang H, Chen Y, Ding S, Wang J, Bao W, Zhang D W, Zhou P 2018 Nanotechnology 29 244004 Google Scholar
[55]	Beresnev L A, Chigrinov V G, Dergachev D I, Poshidaev E P, Fünfschilling J, Schadt M 1989 Liq. Cryst. 5 1171 Google Scholar
[56]	Ye H Y, Tang Y Y, Li P F, Liao W Q, Gao J X, Hua X N, Cai H, Shi P P, You Y M, Xiong R G J S 2018 Science 361 151 Google Scholar
[57]	Li P F, Liao W Q, Tang Y Y, Qiao W, Zhao D, Ai Y, Yao Y F, Xiong R G 2019 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S.A 116 5878 Google Scholar
[58]	Li L, Wu M 2017 ACS Nano 11 6382 Google Scholar
[59]	Ding W, Zhu J, Wang Z, Gao Y, Xiao D, Gu Y, Zhang Z, Zhu W 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14956 Google Scholar
[60]	Li Y, Gong M, Zeng H 2019 J. Semicond. 40 061002s Google Scholar
[61]	Liu F, You L, Seyler K L, Li X, Yu P, Lin J, Wang X, Zhou J, Wang H, He H, Pantelides S T, Zhou W, Sharma P, Xu X, Ajayan P M, Wang J, Liu Z 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12357 Google Scholar
[62]	Wu M, Jena P 2018 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Comput. Mol. Sci. 8 1365 Google Scholar
[63]	Böscke T S, Müller J, Bräuhaus D, Schröder U, Böttger U 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 102903 Google Scholar
[64]	Mueller S, Mueller J, Singh A, Riedel S, Sundqvist J, Schroeder U, Mikolajick T 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 2412 Google Scholar
[65]	Müller J, Schröder U, Böscke T S, Müller I, Böttger U, Wilde L, Sundqvist J, Lemberger M, Kücher P, Mikolajick T, Frey L 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 114113 Google Scholar
[66]	Starschich S, Boettger U 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 333 Google Scholar
[67]	Schroeder U, Mueller S, Mueller J, Yurchuk E, Martin D, Adelmann C, Schloesser T, van Bentum R, Mikolajick T 2013 ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2 N69 Google Scholar
[68]	Schroeder U, Yurchuk E, Müller J, Martin D, Schenk T, Polakowski P, Adelmann C, Popovici M I, Kalinin S V, Mikolajick T 2014 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53 08LE02 Google Scholar
[69]	Müller J, Böscke T S, Bräuhaus D, Schröder U, Böttger U, Sundqvist J, Kücher P, Mikolajick T, Frey L 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 112901 Google Scholar
[70]	Müller J, Boscke T S, Schroder U, Mueller S, Brauhaus D, Bottger U, Frey L, Mikolajick T 2012 Nano Lett. 12 4318 Google Scholar
[71]	Terki R, Bertrand G, Aourag H, Coddet C 2008 Mater. Lett. 62 1484 Google Scholar
[72]	Íñiguez J, Zubko P, Luk’yanchuk I, Cano A 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 243 Google Scholar
[73]	Sayeef S, Supriyo D 2008 Nano Letter 8 405
[74]	Lu P S, Lin C C, Su P 2019 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application Hsinchu, Taiwan, China, April 22–25, 2019 p1
[75]	Muller J, Boscke T S, Schroder U, Hoffmann R, Mikolajick T, Frey L 2012 IEEE Electr. Device L. 33 185 Google Scholar
[76]	Pahwa G, Dutta T, Agarwal A, Chauhan Y S 2017 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 64 1366 Google Scholar
[77]	Park B E, Lee G G 2010 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 56 1484 Google Scholar
[78]	Sun J, Zheng X 2011 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 58 3559 Google Scholar
[79]	Sun J, Zheng X J, Li W 2012 Curr. Appl. Phys. 12 760 Google Scholar
[80]	Jang K, Kobayashi M, Hiramoto T 2018 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57 114202 Google Scholar
[81]	Li Y, Lian Y, Samudra G S 2015 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 30 045011 Google Scholar
[82]	Sun J, Li Y, Cao L 2019 J. Comput. Electron. 18 527 Google Scholar
[83]	Hoffmann M, Pesic M, Slesazeck S, Schroeder U, Mikolajick T 2018 Nanoscale 10 10891 Google Scholar
[84]	Cheng C H, Fan C C, Tu C Y, Hsu H H, Chang C Y 2019 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 66 825 Google Scholar
[85]	Wong J C, Salahuddin S 2019 Proc. IEEE 107 49 Google Scholar
[86]	Luttinger J M, Tisza L 1946 Phys. Rev. 70 954 Google Scholar
[87]	Slater J C 1950 Phys. Rev. 78 748 Google Scholar
[88]	Islam Khan A, Bhowmik D, Yu P, Joo Kim S, Pan X, Ramesh R, Salahuddin S 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 113501 Google Scholar
[89]	Rabe K M, Dawber M, Lichtensteiger C, Ahn C H, Triscone J-M 2007 Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg) pp1–30
[90]	Gao W, Khan A, Marti X, Nelson C, Serrao C, Ravichandran J, Ramesh R, Salahuddin S 2014 Nano Lett. 14 5814 Google Scholar
[91]	Alam M A, Si M, Ye P D 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 090401 Google Scholar
[92]	Liu Z, Bhuiyan M, Ma T 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1–5, 2018 p31.2.1
[93]	Hoffmann M, Slesazeck S, Mikolajick T, Hwang C S 2019 Ferroelectricity in Doped Hafnium Oxide: Materials, Properties and Devices (Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing) p473
[94]	Khan A I, Chatterjee K, Wang B, Drapcho S, You L, Serrao C, Bakaul S R, Ramesh R, Salahuddin S 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 182 Google Scholar
[95]	Jang K, Ueyama N, Kobayashi M, Hiramoto T 2018 IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 6 346 Google Scholar
[96]	Kim K D, Kim Y J, Park M H, Park H W, Kwon Y J, Lee Y B, Kim H J, Moon T, Lee Y H, Hyun S D, Kim B S, Hwang C S 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1808228 Google Scholar
[97]	Han Q, Aleksa P, Tromm T C U, Schubert J, Mantl S, Zhao Q T 2019 Solid-State Electron. 159 71 Google Scholar
[98]	Catalan G, Jiménez D, Gruverman A 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 137 Google Scholar
[99]	Chang S C, Avci U E, Nikonov D E, Manipatruni S, Young I A 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 9 014010 Google Scholar
[100]	Landau L, Khalatnikov I 1954 Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 96 469 Google Scholar
[101]	Hoffmann M, Khan A I, Serrao C, Lu Z, Salahuddin S, Pešić M, Slesazeck S, Schroeder U, Mikolajick T 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 123 184101 Google Scholar
[102]	Merz W J 1954 Phys. Rev. 95 690 Google Scholar
[103]	Chang S-C, Avci U E, Nikonov D E, Young I A 2017 IEEE J. Explor. Solid-State Comput. Devices Circuits 3 56 Google Scholar
[104]	Jin C, Saraya T, Hiramoto T, Kobayashi M 2019 IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 7 368 Google Scholar
[105]	Wang H, Yang M, Huang Q, Zhu K, Zhao Y, Liang Z, Chen C, Wang Z, Zhong Y, Zhang X 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1–5, 2018 p31.1.1
[106]	Orihara H, Hashimoto S, Ishibashi Y 1994 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63 1031 Google Scholar
[107]	Jo J, Shin C 2016 IEEE Electr. Device L. 37 245 Google Scholar
[108]	Nourbakhsh A, Zubair A, Joglekar S, Dresselhaus M, Palacios T 2017 Nanoscale 9 6122 Google Scholar
[109]	Saeidi A, Jazaeri F, Bellando F, Stolichnov I, Enz C C, Ionescu A M 2017 47th European Solid-State Device Research Conference Leuven, Belgium, September 11–14, 2017 p78
[110]	Galatage R, Bentley S, Suvarna P H, Krivokapic Z 2018 US Patent 10 141 414 B1
[111]	Khan A I, Yeung C W, Hu C, Salahuddin S 2012 International Electron Devices Meeting Washington, DC, USA, December 5–7, 2011 p11.3.1
[112]	Agarwal H, Kushwaha P, Lin Y K, Kao M Y, Liao Y H, Dasgupta A, Salahuddin S, Hu C 2019 IEEE Electr. Device L. 40 463 Google Scholar
[113]	Si M, Su C J, Jiang C, Conrad N J, Zhou H, Maize K D, Qiu G, Wu C T, Shakouri A, Alam M A, Ye P D 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 24 Google Scholar
[114]	Bohr M T, Young I A 2017 IEEE Micro 37 20
[115]	Cheng C H, Chin A 2014 IEEE Electr.Device L. 35 274 Google Scholar
[116]	Fan CC, Cheng CH, Chen YR, Liu C, Chang CY 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 2–6, 2017 p23.2.1
[117]	Chiu YC, Cheng CH, Chang C-, Tang YT, Chen MC 2016 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology Honolulu, HI, USA, June 14–16, 2016 p1
[118]	Cheng CH, Fan CC, Hsu HH, Wang SA, Chang CY 2019 Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 13 1800493 Google Scholar
[119]	Cheng C H, Lin M H, Chen H Y, Fan C C, Liu C, Hsu H H, Chang C Y 2018 Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 13 1800573 Google Scholar
[120]	Zeng B, Xiao W, Liao J, Liu H, Liao M, Peng Q, Zheng S, Zhou Y 2018 IEEE Electr. Device L. 39 1508 Google Scholar
[121]	Chen K T, Liao C Y, Chen H Y, Lo C, Siang G Y, Lin Y Y, Tseng Y J, Chang C, Chueh C Y, Yang Y J, Liao M H, Li K S, Chang S T, Lee M H 2019 Microelectron. Eng. 215 110991 Google Scholar
[122]	Xiao W, Liu C, Peng Y, Zheng S, Feng Q, Zhang C, Zhang J, Hao Y, Liao M, Zhou Y 2019 IEEE Electr. Device L. 40 714 Google Scholar
[123]	Li K S, Chen P G, Lai T Y, Lin C H, Cheng C C, Chen C C, Wei Y J, Hou Y F, Liao M H, Lee M H 2016 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Washington, DC, USA, December 7–9, 2015 p22.6.1
[124]	Zhang Z, Xu G, Zhang Q, Hou Z, Li J, Kong Z, Zhang Y, Xiang J, Xu Q, Wu Z, Zhu H, Yin H, Wang W, Ye T 2019 IEEE Electr. Device L. 40 367 Google Scholar
[125]	Chen P J, Tsai M J, Hou F J, Wu Y C 2019 Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop Kyoto, Japan, June 9–10, 2019 p1
[126]	Lee S Y, Chen H W, Shen C H, Kuo P Y, Chung C C, Huang Y E, Chen H Y, Chao T S 2019 IEEE Electr. Device L. 40 1708 Google Scholar
[127]	Bansal A K, Kumar M, Gupta C, Hook T B, Dixit A 2018 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 65 3548 Google Scholar
[128]	Song Y, Zhou H, Xu Q, Luo J, Yin H, Yan J, Zhong H 2011 J. Electron. Mater. 40 1584 Google Scholar
[129]	Zhou J, Han G, Li Q, Peng Y, Lu X, Zhang C, Zhang J, Sun QQ, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 3–7, 2016 p12.2.1
[130]	Zhou J, Han G, Peng Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2017 IEEE Electr. Device L. 38 1157 Google Scholar
[131]	Li J, Zhou J, Han G, Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhang J, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2017 IEEE Electr. Device L. 38 1500 Google Scholar
[132]	Zhou J, Han G, Li J, Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhang J, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2018 IEEE Electr.Device L. 39 622 Google Scholar
[133]	Zhou J, Han G, Li J, Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhang J, Sun Q Q, Zhang D W, Hao Y 2018 IEEE Electr. Device L. 39 618 Google Scholar
[134]	Peng Y, Liu Y, Han G, Zhang J, Hao Y 2019 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14 125 Google Scholar
[135]	Alghamdi S, Chung W, Si M, Peide D Y 2018 76th Device Research Conference Santa Barbara, CA, USA, June 24–27, 2018 p1
[136]	Luc Q, Fan-Chiang C, Huynh S, Huang P, Do H, Ha M, Jin Y, Nguyen T, Zhang K, Wang H 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology Honolulu, HI, USA, June 18–22, 2018 p47
[137]	Chang E Y, Luc Q H, Tran N A, Lin Y C 2019 ECS Trans. 92 3 Google Scholar
[138]	Srimani T, Hills G, Bishop M D, Radhakrishna U, Zubair A, Park R S, Stein Y, Palacios T, Antoniadis D, Shulaker M M 2018 IEEE Electr. Device L. 39 304 Google Scholar
[139]	Tu L, Wang X, Wang J, Meng X, Chu J 2018 Adv. Electron. Mater. 4 1800231 Google Scholar
[140]	Si M, Jiang C, Chung W, Du Y, Alam M A, Ye P D 2018 Nano Lett. 18 3682 Google Scholar
[141]	Lee Y T, Kwon H, Kim J S, Kim H H, Lee Y J, Lim J A, Song YW, Yi Y, Choi WK, Hwang D K 2015 ACS Nano 9 10394 Google Scholar
[142]	Heidler J, Yang S, Feng X, Müllen K, Asadi K 2018 Solid-State Electron. 144 90 Google Scholar
[143]	Choi H, Shin C 2019 Phys. Status Solidi A 216 1900177 Google Scholar
[144]	Yu Z, Wang H, Li W, Xu S, Song X, Wang S, Wang P, Zhou P, Shi Y, Chai Y 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 2-6, 2017 p23.6.1
[145]	Yap W C, Jiang H, Liu J, Xia Q, Zhu W 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 013103 Google Scholar
[146]	McGuire F A, Lin Y C, Rayner B, Franklin A D 2017 75th Annual Device Research Conference South Bend, IN, USA, June 25–28, 2017 p1
[147]	Alghamdi S, Si M, Yang L, Peide D Y 2018 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Burlingame, CA, USA, March 11–15, 2018 pP-TX.1-1
[148]	Wang J, Guo X, Yu Z, Ma Z, Liu Y, Chan M, Zhu Y, Wang X, Chai Y 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1–5, 2018 p22.3.1
[149]	Si M, Peide D Y 2018 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application Hsinchu, Taiwan, April 16–19, 2018 p1
[150]	Liu F, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Liu X, Wang J, Guo H 2016 NPJ Quantum Mater. 1 16004 Google Scholar
[151]	Park N, Kang H, Park J, Lee Y, Yun Y, Lee J H, Lee S G, Lee Y H, Suh D 2015 ACS Nano 9 10729 Google Scholar
[152]	Jie W, Hao J 2017 Nanoscale 10 328
[153]	Lipatov A, Fursina A, Vo T H, Sharma P, Gruverman A, Sinitskii A 2017 Adv. Electron. Mater. 3 1700020 Google Scholar
[154]	Lee Y, Jeon W, Cho Y, Lee M H, Jeong S J, Park J, Park S 2016 ACS Nano 10 6659 Google Scholar
[155]	Tian H, Li Y-x, Li L, Wang X, Liang R, Yang Y, Ren T L 2019 IEEE T. Electron Dev. 66 1579 Google Scholar
[156]	Li J, Liu Y, Han G, Zhou J, Hao Y 2019 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14 171 Google Scholar
[157]	Peng Y, Han G, Xiao W, Wu J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Hao Y 2019 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14 115 Google Scholar
[158]	Tokumitsu E 2020 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 59 SCCB06 Google Scholar
[159]	Park J H, Jang G S, Kim H Y, Seok K H, Chae H J, Lee S K, Joo S K 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 24734 Google Scholar
[160]	Lee M H, Fan S T, Tang C H, Chen P G, Chou Y C, Chen H H, Kuo J Y, Xie M J, Liu S N, Liao M H 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting San Francisco, CA, USA, December 3–7, 2016 p12.1.1
[161]	Zhang X D, Han W H, Liu W, Zhao X S, Guo Y Y, Yang C, Chen J D, Yang F H 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 127302 Google Scholar
[162]	Guo Y Y, Han W H, Zhao X S, Dou Y M, Zhang X D, Wu X Y, Yang F H 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 107303 Google Scholar
[163]	Zhao X S, Han W H, Guo Y Y, Dou Y M, Yang F H 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 097310 Google Scholar

[1]	苏乐, 王彩琳, 谭在超, 罗寅, 杨武华, 张超. 功率金属-氧化物半导体场效应晶体管静电放电栅源电容解析模型的建立. 物理学报, 2024, 73(11): 118501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240144
[2]	沈睿祥, 张鸿, 宋宏甲, 侯鹏飞, 李波, 廖敏, 郭红霞, 王金斌, 钟向丽. 全耗尽绝缘体上硅氧化铪基铁电场效应晶体管存储单元单粒子效应计算机模拟研究. 物理学报, 2022, 71(6): 068501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211655
[3]	田金朋, 王硕培, 时东霞, 张广宇. 垂直短沟道二硫化钼场效应晶体管. 物理学报, 2022, 71(21): 218502. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220738
[4]	黎华梅, 侯鹏飞, 王金斌, 宋宏甲, 钟向丽. HfO₂基铁电场效应晶体管读写电路的单粒子翻转效应模拟. 物理学报, 2020, 69(9): 098502. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200123
[5]	孟宪成, 田贺, 安侠, 袁硕, 范超, 王蒙军, 郑宏兴. 基于二维材料二硒化锡场效应晶体管的光电探测器. 物理学报, 2020, 69(13): 137801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191960
[6]	张梦, 姚若河, 刘玉荣. 纳米尺度金属-氧化物半导体场效应晶体管沟道热噪声模型. 物理学报, 2020, 69(5): 057101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191512
[7]	张梦, 姚若河, 刘玉荣, 耿魁伟. 短沟道金属-氧化物半导体场效应晶体管的散粒噪声模型. 物理学报, 2020, 69(17): 177102. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200497
[8]	赵毅, 李骏康, 郑泽杰. 硅/锗基场效应晶体管沟道中载流子散射机制研究进展. 物理学报, 2019, 68(16): 167301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191146
[9]	张金风, 杨鹏志, 任泽阳, 张进成, 许晟瑞, 张春福, 徐雷, 郝跃. 高跨导氢终端多晶金刚石长沟道场效应晶体管特性研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(6): 068101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171965
[10]	刘畅, 卢继武, 吴汪然, 唐晓雨, 张睿, 俞文杰, 王曦, 赵毅. 超短沟道绝缘层上硅平面场效应晶体管中热载流子注入应力导致的退化对沟道长度的依赖性. 物理学报, 2015, 64(16): 167305. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.167305
[11]	吕懿, 张鹤鸣, 胡辉勇, 杨晋勇, 殷树娟, 周春宇. 单轴应变硅N沟道金属氧化物半导体场效应晶体管电容特性模型. 物理学报, 2015, 64(6): 067305. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.067305
[12]	刘红侠, 王志, 卓青青, 王倩琼. 总剂量辐照下沟道长度对部分耗尽绝缘体上硅p型场效应晶体管电特性的影响. 物理学报, 2014, 63(1): 016102. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.016102
[13]	辛艳辉, 刘红侠, 王树龙, 范小娇. 对称三材料双栅应变硅金属氧化物半导体场效应晶体管二维解析模型. 物理学报, 2014, 63(14): 148502. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.148502
[14]	韩名君, 柯导明, 迟晓丽, 王敏, 王保童. 超短沟道MOSFET电势的二维半解析模型. 物理学报, 2013, 62(9): 098502. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.098502
[15]	陈海峰. 反向衬底偏压下纳米N沟道金属氧化物半导体场效应晶体管中栅调制界面产生电流特性研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(18): 188503. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.188503
[16]	李伟华, 庄奕琪, 杜磊, 包军林. n型金属氧化物半导体场效应晶体管噪声非高斯性研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(10): 7183-7188. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7183
[17]	李东临, 曾一平. InP基HEMT器件中二维电子气浓度及分布与沟道层厚度关系的理论分析. 物理学报, 2006, 55(7): 3677-3682. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3677
[18]	李艳萍, 徐静平, 陈卫兵, 许胜国, 季峰. 考虑量子效应的短沟道MOSFET二维阈值电压模型. 物理学报, 2006, 55(7): 3670-3676. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3670
[19]	王华, 任鸣放. Ag/Bi4Ti3O12栅n沟道铁电场效应晶体管制备及存储特性. 物理学报, 2006, 55(3): 1512-1516. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1512
[20]	康　雷, 赵　乾, 赵晓鹏. 二维负磁导率材料中的缺陷效应. 物理学报, 2004, 53(10): 3379-3383. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3379

计量

文章访问数: 27872
PDF下载量: 1611
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板