-
非厄米系统近年来受到了物理学相关领域研究人员的大量关注. 非厄米因素的存在往往会带来许多在厄米系统中不存在的新奇效应. 本文引入一类新的非厄米晶格系统—非厄米镶嵌型二聚化晶格. 在这一模型中, 交替变化的非对称跃迁被等间距地施加在某些相邻格点的跃迁项中. 研究结果表明, 随着非对称跃迁强度的增大, 系统在开边界条件下的能谱会从实数变为复数. 此外, 系统中的非厄米趋肤效应和不同边界条件下的能谱性质会受到镶嵌型调制周期的影响. 当这一调制周期为奇数时, 系统中不存在非厄米趋肤效应, 且其能谱在开放和周期边界条件下是一样的（拓扑边界态除外）; 而当镶嵌型调制周期为偶数时, 系统中存在非厄米趋肤效应, 且其能谱在不同的边界条件下具有完全不同的结构. 本文进一步研究了这类系统中的拓扑零能边界态, 并计算了Berry相位对其进行表征. 本研究揭示了镶嵌型非对称跃迁对系统性质的影响, 拓展了非厄米系统这一领域的相关研究.Non-Hermitian systems have attracted much attention during the past few years, both theoretically and experimentally. The existence of non-Hermiticity can induce multiple exotic phenomena that cannot be observed in Hermitian systems. In this work, we introduce a new non-Hermitian system called the non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattice. Unlike the regular nonreciprocal lattices where asymmetric hoppings are imposed on every hopping term, here in the mosaic dimerized lattices the staggered asymmetric hoppings are only added to the nearest-neighboring hopping terms with equally spaced sites. By investigating the energy spectra, the non-Hermitian skin effect (NHSE), and the topological phases in such lattice models, we find that the period of the mosaic asymmetric hopping can influence the system’s properties significantly. For a system with real system parameters, we find that as the strength of asymmetric hopping increases, the energy spectra of the system under open boundary conditions will undergo a real-imaginary or real-complex transition. As to the NHSE, we find that when the period is odd, there appears no NHSE in the system and the spectra under open boundary conditions (OBCs) and periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) are the same (except for the topological edge modes under OBCs). If the period of the mosaic asymmetric hopping is even, the NHSE will emerge and the spectra under different boundary conditions exhibit distinctive structures. The PBC spectra form loop structures, indicating the existence of point gaps that are absent in the spectra under OBCs. The point gap in the PBC spectrum is shown to be the topological origin of the NHSE under OBCs, which also explains the NHSE in our mosaic dimerized lattices. To distinguish whether the bulk states of the system under OBCs are shifted to the left or right end of the one-dimensional lattice due to the NHSE, we define a new variable called the directional inverse participation ratio (dIPR). The positive dIPR indicates that the state is localized at the right end while the negative dIPR corresponds to the states localized at the left end of the one-dimensional lattice. We further study the topological zero-energy edge modes and characterize them by calculating the Berry phases based on the generalized Bloch Hamiltonian method. In addition, we also find that the topological edge modes with nonzero but constant energy can exist in the system. Our work provides a new non-Hermitian lattice model and unveils the exotic effect of mosaic asymmetric hopping on the properties of non-Hermitian systems.
-
Keywords:
- non-Hermitian systems /
- mosaic asymmetric hopping /
- non-Hermitian skin effect /
- topological zero-energy edge modes
[1] Cao H and Wiersig J 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 61
Google Scholar
[2] Konotop V V, Yang J, Zezyulin D A 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 035002
Google Scholar
[3] El-Ganainy R, Makris K G, Khajavikhan M, Musslimani Z H, Rotter S, Christodoulides D N 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 11
Google Scholar
[4] Ashida Y, Gong Z, Ueda M 2020 Adv. Phys. 69 3
[5] Bergholtz E J, Budich J C, Kunst F K 2021 Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 015005
Google Scholar
[6] Makris K G, El-Ganainy R, Christodoulides D N, Musslimani Z H 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 103904
Google Scholar
[7] Klaiman S, Günther U, Moiseyev N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 080402
Google Scholar
[8] Guo A, Salamo G J, Duchesne D, Morandotti R, Volatier-Ravat M, Aimez V, Siviloglou G A, Christodoulides D N 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 093902
Google Scholar
[9] Rüter C E, Makris K G, El-Ganainy R, Christodoulides D N, Segev M, Kip D 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 192
Google Scholar
[10] Regensburger A, Bersch C, Miri M A, Onishchukov G, Christodoulides D N, Peschel U 2012 Nature 488 167
Google Scholar
[11] Feng L, Xu Y L, Fegadolli W S, Lu M H, Oliveira J E B, Almeida V R, Chen Y F, Scherer A 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 108
Google Scholar
[12] Peng B, Özdemir S K, Lei F, Monifi F, Gianfreda M, Long G L, Fan S, Nori F, Bender C M, Yang L 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 394
Google Scholar
[13] Wiersig J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 203901
Google Scholar
[14] Hodaei H, Hassan A U, Wittek S, Garcia-Gracia H, El-Ganainy R, Christodoulides D N, Khajavikhan M 2017 Nature 548 187
Google Scholar
[15] Chen W, Özdemir S K, Zhao G, Wiersig J, Yang L 2017 Nature 548 192
Google Scholar
[16] Brody D C, Graefe E M 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 230405
Google Scholar
[17] Lee T E, Chan C K 2014 Phys. Rev. X 4 041001
[18] Li J, Harder A K, Liu J, de Melo L, Joglekar Y N, Luo L 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 855
Google Scholar
[19] Kawabata K, Ashida Y, Ueda M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 190401
Google Scholar
[20] Hamazaki R, Kawabata K, Ueda M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 090603
Google Scholar
[21] Xiao L, Wang K, Zhan X, Bian Z, Kawabata K, Ueda M, Yi W, Xue P 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 230401
Google Scholar
[22] Wu Y, Liu W, Geng J, Song X, Ye X, Duan C K, Rong X, Du J 2019 Science 364 878
Google Scholar
[23] Yamamoto K, Nakagawa M, Adachi K, Takasan K, Ueda M, Kawakami N 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 123601
Google Scholar
[24] Naghiloo M, Abbasi N, Joglekar Y N, Murch K W 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 1232
Google Scholar
[25] Matsumoto N, Kawabata K, Ashida Y, Furukawa S, Ueda M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 260601
Google Scholar
[26] Gong Z, Ashida Y, Kawabata K, Takasan K, Higashikawa S, Ueda M 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031079
[27] Shen R, Lee C H 2021 arXiv: 2107.03414
[28] Zeng Q B, Lü R 2022 Phys. Rev. A 105 042211
Google Scholar
[29] Bender C M, Boettcher S 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5243
Google Scholar
[30] Bender C M, Brody D C, Jones H F 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 270401
Google Scholar
[31] Bender C M 2007 Rep. Prog. Phys. 70 947
Google Scholar
[32] Mostafazadeh A 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 205
Google Scholar
[33] Mostafazadeh A 2010 Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 7 1191
Google Scholar
[34] Zeng Q B, Yang Y B, Lü R 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 125418
Google Scholar
[35] Kawabata K, Sato M 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 033391
Google Scholar
[36] Lee T E 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 133903
Google Scholar
[37] Lieu S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 045106
Google Scholar
[38] Yin C, Jiang H, Li L, Lü R, Chen S. 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 052115
Google Scholar
[39] Hatano N, Nelson D R 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 570
Google Scholar
[40] Yao S, Wang Z 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 086803
Google Scholar
[41] Yao S, Song F, Wang Z, 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 136802
Google Scholar
[42] Xiong Y 2018 J. Phys. Commun. 2 035043
Google Scholar
[43] Budich J C, Bergholtz E J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 180403
Google Scholar
[44] Koch F, Budich J C 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4 013113
Google Scholar
[45] Kunst F K, Edvardsson E, Budich J C, Bergholtz E J 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 026808
Google Scholar
[46] Jin L, Song Z 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 081103(R
[47] Yokomizo K, Murakami S 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 066404
Google Scholar
[48] Herviou L, Bardarson H H, Regnault N 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 052118
Google Scholar
[49] Yang Z, Zhang K, Fang C, Hu J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 226402
Google Scholar
[50] Zirnstein H G, Refael G, Rosenow B 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 216407
Google Scholar
[51] Zhang Z Q, Liu H, Liu H, Jiang H, Xie X C 2022 arXiv: 2201.01577
[52] Borgnia D S, Kruchkov A J, Slager R J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 056802
Google Scholar
[53] Okuma N, Kawabata K, Shiozaki K, Sato M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 086801
Google Scholar
[54] Zhang K, Yang Z, Fang C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 126402
Google Scholar
[55] Shnerb N M, Nelson D R 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5172
Google Scholar
[56] Jiang H, Lang L J, Yang C, Zhu S L, Chen S 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 054301
Google Scholar
[57] Zeng Q B, Xu Y 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 033052
Google Scholar
[58] Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu X J, Zhou Q, Chen S 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 014203
Google Scholar
[59] Liu Y, Zhou Q, Chen S 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 024201
[60] Wang Y, Xia X, Zhang L, Yao H, Chen S, You J, Zhou Q, Liu X J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 196604
Google Scholar
[61] Zeng Q B, Lü R, You L 2021 Europhys. Lett. 135 17003
Google Scholar
[62] Zeng Q B, Lü R 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 064203
-
图 1 具有镶嵌型非对称跃迁的一维非厄米二聚化晶格示意图. 第sκ个格点和第sκ+1格点之间的跃迁振幅是不对称的, 为
$ t \pm {( - 1)^j}\lambda $ Fig. 1. Schematic of the one-dimensional non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattice with asymmetric hopping. The backward and forwardward hopping amplitudes between the sκ-th and sκ+1-th sites are
$ t \pm {( - 1)^j}\lambda $ , which are asymmetric.
图 2 具有不同镶嵌型调制的一维非厄米二聚化晶格模型在开边界条件下的本征能谱. 上半部分为能谱实部, 下半部分为能谱虚部; 图中的颜色代表该能量对应的本征态的dIPR值; 系统大小为
$ L = 120 $ Fig. 2. The eigenenergy spectra of the 1D non-Hermitian dimerized lattices with different mosaic modulations. The upper panel shows the real parts of the spectra while the lower panel shows the imaginary parts, the colorbar indicates the dIPR value of the eigenstate, the lattice size is
$ L = 120 $ .
图 3 一维非厄米镶嵌型二聚化晶格在周期性边界条件下的本征能谱
Fig. 3. The eigenenergy spectra of the 1D non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattices under periodic boundary conditions.
图 4 具有非对称跃迁的一维镶嵌型二聚化晶格中的非厄米趋肤效应 (a) 在开边界条件下, 当本征态的
$ {\text{dIPR}} > 0({\text{dIPR}} < 0) $ 时, 体态将局域在一维系统的右端(左端); (b) 系统的dMIPR值在不同的镶嵌型调制周期下的变化Fig. 4. The non-Hermitian skin effect in the 1D mosaic dimerized lattices with asymmetric hopping: (a) Under open boundary conditions, the bulk eigenstates with
$ {\text{dIPR}} > 0({\text{dIPR}} < 0) $ will be localized at the right (left) end of the lattice; (b) the variations of dMIPR for the systems with different mosaic modulation.
图 5 在
$ \lambda = 1.5 $ 时, 系统在不同边界条件下的能谱. 棕色代表开边界条件(OBC)下的能谱, 蓝色代表周期边界条件(PBC)下的能谱Fig. 5. The energy spectra under different boundary conditions of the system with
$ \lambda = 1.5 $ . The brown dots represent the spectra under OBC and the blue dots represent the spectra under PBC.
图 6 一维非厄米镶嵌型二聚化晶格在开边界条件下能谱的绝对值(上图), 图中的颜色代表该能量对应的本征态的dIPR值, 系统的大小为
$ L = 120 $ ; 不同$ \kappa $ 值下, 系统的本征态的空间分布(下图),$ \kappa = 1 $ 时, 系统的本征态都为扩展态;$ \kappa = 2 $ 和4时, 系统中存在局域在边界上的零能拓扑态. 此外, 在$ \kappa = 3 $ 和4时, 系统中分别存在能量为$ |E| = 1 $ 和$ |E| = 1.414 $ 的边界态Fig. 6. The absolute values of the eigenenergies of the non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattices (upper), the colorbar indicates the dIPR value of the eigenstates, the lattice size is
$ L = 120 $ ; the distribution of eigenstates for systems with different$ \kappa $ values(lower), when$ \kappa = 1 $ , the eigenstates are extended. When$ \kappa = 2 $ and 4, there are topological zero-energy edge modes in the system. In addition, in the systems with$ \kappa = 3 $ and 4, there are also edge states with energies$ |E| = 1 $ and$ |E| = 1.414 $ , respectively.
图 7 一维非厄米镶嵌型二聚化晶格在
$ \kappa = 2 $ (蓝色虚线)和$ \kappa = 4 $ (红色空心圆点)时的贝里相位. 数值结果分别是将本征能量的实部小于零的能带的贝里相位相加得到, 从而表征系统中出现的拓扑零能边界态Fig. 7. The Berry phase for the 1 D non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattices with
$ \kappa = 2 $ (blue dashed line) and$ \kappa = 4 $ (red empty circles). The numerical results are obtained by summing up the Berrry phases of the bands with the real part of the eigenenergies smaller than 0 and thus characterize the existence of topological zero modes.
图 8 具有不同
$ \kappa $ 值的一维非厄米镶嵌型二聚化晶格在开边界条件下的能谱, 图中的颜色代表本征态的dIPR值Fig. 8. The eigenenergy spectra of the one-dimensional non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattices with different
$ \kappa $ values under open boundary conditions. The color bar indicates the of the dIPR values eigenstates.
图 9 具有不同尺度的一维非厄米镶嵌型二聚化晶格在开边界条件下的能谱 (a1)—(a4)和(b1)—(b4)分别对应
$ \kappa = 2 $ 和3的系统Fig. 9. The energy spectra of the one-dimensional non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattices with different sizes under open boundary conditions, (a1)–(a4) and (b1)–(b4) correspond to the systems with
$ \kappa = 2 $ and 3, respectively.表 1 具有不同
$ \kappa $ 值的一维非厄米镶嵌型二聚化晶格的性质Table 1. The eigenenergy spectra of the one-dimensional non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattices with different
$ \kappa $ values.$ \kappa $取值 非厄米趋肤效应 子晶格对称性 拓扑零能边界态 $ \kappa $为奇数 无 有 无 $ \kappa $为偶数 有 有 有 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Cao H and Wiersig J 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 61
Google Scholar
[2] Konotop V V, Yang J, Zezyulin D A 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 035002
Google Scholar
[3] El-Ganainy R, Makris K G, Khajavikhan M, Musslimani Z H, Rotter S, Christodoulides D N 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 11
Google Scholar
[4] Ashida Y, Gong Z, Ueda M 2020 Adv. Phys. 69 3
[5] Bergholtz E J, Budich J C, Kunst F K 2021 Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 015005
Google Scholar
[6] Makris K G, El-Ganainy R, Christodoulides D N, Musslimani Z H 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 103904
Google Scholar
[7] Klaiman S, Günther U, Moiseyev N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 080402
Google Scholar
[8] Guo A, Salamo G J, Duchesne D, Morandotti R, Volatier-Ravat M, Aimez V, Siviloglou G A, Christodoulides D N 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 093902
Google Scholar
[9] Rüter C E, Makris K G, El-Ganainy R, Christodoulides D N, Segev M, Kip D 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 192
Google Scholar
[10] Regensburger A, Bersch C, Miri M A, Onishchukov G, Christodoulides D N, Peschel U 2012 Nature 488 167
Google Scholar
[11] Feng L, Xu Y L, Fegadolli W S, Lu M H, Oliveira J E B, Almeida V R, Chen Y F, Scherer A 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 108
Google Scholar
[12] Peng B, Özdemir S K, Lei F, Monifi F, Gianfreda M, Long G L, Fan S, Nori F, Bender C M, Yang L 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 394
Google Scholar
[13] Wiersig J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 203901
Google Scholar
[14] Hodaei H, Hassan A U, Wittek S, Garcia-Gracia H, El-Ganainy R, Christodoulides D N, Khajavikhan M 2017 Nature 548 187
Google Scholar
[15] Chen W, Özdemir S K, Zhao G, Wiersig J, Yang L 2017 Nature 548 192
Google Scholar
[16] Brody D C, Graefe E M 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 230405
Google Scholar
[17] Lee T E, Chan C K 2014 Phys. Rev. X 4 041001
[18] Li J, Harder A K, Liu J, de Melo L, Joglekar Y N, Luo L 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 855
Google Scholar
[19] Kawabata K, Ashida Y, Ueda M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 190401
Google Scholar
[20] Hamazaki R, Kawabata K, Ueda M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 090603
Google Scholar
[21] Xiao L, Wang K, Zhan X, Bian Z, Kawabata K, Ueda M, Yi W, Xue P 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 230401
Google Scholar
[22] Wu Y, Liu W, Geng J, Song X, Ye X, Duan C K, Rong X, Du J 2019 Science 364 878
Google Scholar
[23] Yamamoto K, Nakagawa M, Adachi K, Takasan K, Ueda M, Kawakami N 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 123601
Google Scholar
[24] Naghiloo M, Abbasi N, Joglekar Y N, Murch K W 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 1232
Google Scholar
[25] Matsumoto N, Kawabata K, Ashida Y, Furukawa S, Ueda M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 260601
Google Scholar
[26] Gong Z, Ashida Y, Kawabata K, Takasan K, Higashikawa S, Ueda M 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031079
[27] Shen R, Lee C H 2021 arXiv: 2107.03414
[28] Zeng Q B, Lü R 2022 Phys. Rev. A 105 042211
Google Scholar
[29] Bender C M, Boettcher S 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5243
Google Scholar
[30] Bender C M, Brody D C, Jones H F 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 270401
Google Scholar
[31] Bender C M 2007 Rep. Prog. Phys. 70 947
Google Scholar
[32] Mostafazadeh A 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 205
Google Scholar
[33] Mostafazadeh A 2010 Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 7 1191
Google Scholar
[34] Zeng Q B, Yang Y B, Lü R 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 125418
Google Scholar
[35] Kawabata K, Sato M 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 033391
Google Scholar
[36] Lee T E 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 133903
Google Scholar
[37] Lieu S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 045106
Google Scholar
[38] Yin C, Jiang H, Li L, Lü R, Chen S. 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 052115
Google Scholar
[39] Hatano N, Nelson D R 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 570
Google Scholar
[40] Yao S, Wang Z 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 086803
Google Scholar
[41] Yao S, Song F, Wang Z, 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 136802
Google Scholar
[42] Xiong Y 2018 J. Phys. Commun. 2 035043
Google Scholar
[43] Budich J C, Bergholtz E J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 180403
Google Scholar
[44] Koch F, Budich J C 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4 013113
Google Scholar
[45] Kunst F K, Edvardsson E, Budich J C, Bergholtz E J 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 026808
Google Scholar
[46] Jin L, Song Z 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 081103(R
[47] Yokomizo K, Murakami S 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 066404
Google Scholar
[48] Herviou L, Bardarson H H, Regnault N 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 052118
Google Scholar
[49] Yang Z, Zhang K, Fang C, Hu J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 226402
Google Scholar
[50] Zirnstein H G, Refael G, Rosenow B 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 216407
Google Scholar
[51] Zhang Z Q, Liu H, Liu H, Jiang H, Xie X C 2022 arXiv: 2201.01577
[52] Borgnia D S, Kruchkov A J, Slager R J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 056802
Google Scholar
[53] Okuma N, Kawabata K, Shiozaki K, Sato M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 086801
Google Scholar
[54] Zhang K, Yang Z, Fang C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 126402
Google Scholar
[55] Shnerb N M, Nelson D R 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5172
Google Scholar
[56] Jiang H, Lang L J, Yang C, Zhu S L, Chen S 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 054301
Google Scholar
[57] Zeng Q B, Xu Y 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 033052
Google Scholar
[58] Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu X J, Zhou Q, Chen S 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 014203
Google Scholar
[59] Liu Y, Zhou Q, Chen S 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 024201
[60] Wang Y, Xia X, Zhang L, Yao H, Chen S, You J, Zhou Q, Liu X J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 196604
Google Scholar
[61] Zeng Q B, Lü R, You L 2021 Europhys. Lett. 135 17003
Google Scholar
[62] Zeng Q B, Lü R 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 064203
-
[1] 郭刚峰, 包茜茜, 谭磊, 刘伍明. 非厄米准周期系统中的二次局域体态和局域-扩展的边缘态. 物理学报, 2025, 74(1): 1-9. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20240933 [2] 古燕, 陆展鹏. 非厄米耦合链中的局域化转变. 物理学报, 2024, 73(19): 197101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240976 [3] 刘辉, 陆展鹏, 徐志浩. 一维非厄米十字晶格中的退局域-局域转变. 物理学报, 2024, 73(13): 137201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240510 [4] 黄泽鑫, 圣宗强, 程乐乐, 曹三祝, 陈华俊, 吴宏伟. 一维非互易声学晶体的非厄米趋肤态操控. 物理学报, 2024, 73(21): 214301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241087 [5] 徐灿鸿, 许志聪, 周子榆, 成恩宏, 郎利君. 非厄米格点模型的经典电路模拟. 物理学报, 2023, 72(20): 200301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230914 [6] 李竞, 丁海涛, 张丹伟. 非厄米哈密顿量中的量子Fisher信息与参数估计. 物理学报, 2023, 72(20): 200601. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230862 [7] 杨艳丽, 段志磊, 薛海斌. 非厄米Su-Schrieffer-Heeger链边缘态和趋肤效应依赖的电子输运特性. 物理学报, 2023, 72(24): 247301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231286 [8] 李家锐, 王梓安, 徐彤彤, 张莲莲, 公卫江. 一维 ${\cal {PT}}$ 对称非厄米自旋轨道耦合Su-Schrieffer-Heeger模型的拓扑性质. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 177302. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220796[9] 孙思彤, 丁应星, 刘伍明. 基于线性与非线性干涉仪的量子精密测量研究进展. 物理学报, 2022, 71(13): 130701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220425 [10] 成恩宏, 郎利君. 非互易Aubry-André 模型的经典电路模拟. 物理学报, 2022, 71(16): 160301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220219 [11] 张禧征, 王鹏, 张坤亮, 杨学敏, 宋智. 非厄米临界动力学及其在量子多体系统中的应用. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 174501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220914 [12] 高雪儿, 李代莉, 刘志航, 郑超. 非厄米系统的量子模拟新进展. 物理学报, 2022, 71(24): 240303. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221825 [13] 祝可嘉, 郭志伟, 陈鸿. 实验观测非厄米系统奇异点的手性翻转现象. 物理学报, 2022, 71(13): 131101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220842 [14] 刘佳琳, 庞婷方, 杨孝森, 王正岭. 无序非厄米Su-Schrieffer-Heeger中的趋肤效应. 物理学报, 2022, 71(22): 227402. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221151 [15] 陈舒越, 蒋闯, 柯少林, 王兵, 陆培祥. 基于Aharonov-Bohm笼的非厄米趋肤效应抑制现象. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 174201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220978 [16] 邓天舒. 畴壁系统中的非厄米趋肤效应. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 170306. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221087 [17] 孙孔浩, 易为. 非厄米局域拓扑指标的动力学特性. 物理学报, 2021, 70(23): 230309. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211576 [18] 胡渝民, 宋飞, 汪忠. 广义布里渊区与非厄米能带理论. 物理学报, 2021, 70(23): 230307. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211908 [19] 许楠, 张岩. 三聚化非厄密晶格中具有趋肤效应的拓扑边缘态. 物理学报, 2019, 68(10): 104206. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190112 [20] 陈增军, 宁西京. 非厄米哈密顿量的物理意义. 物理学报, 2003, 52(11): 2683-2686. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2683
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 4866
- PDF下载量: 314
- 被引次数: 0
