-
由忆阻耦合的神经网络模型, 因其能更真实地反映生物神经系统的复杂动力学特性而被广泛研究. 目前用于耦合神经网络的忆阻器数学模型主要集中在一次函数、绝对值函数、双曲正切函数等, 为进一步丰富忆阻耦合神经网络模型, 且考虑到一些掺杂半导体中粒子的运动规律, 设计了一种新的复合指数型局部有源忆阻器, 并将其作为耦合突触用于Hopfield神经网络, 利用基本的动力学分析方法, 研究了系统在不同参数下的动力学行为, 以及在不同初始值下多种分岔模式共存的现象. 实验结果表明, 忆阻突触内部参数对系统具有调控作用, 且该系统拥有丰富的动力学行为, 包括对称吸引子共存、非对称吸引子共存、大范围的混沌状态和簇发振荡等. 最后, 用STM32单片机对系统进行了硬件实现.
-
关键词:
- 局部有源忆阻器 /
- Hopfield神经网络 /
- 多种共存吸引子 /
- 簇发振荡
The neural network model coupled with memristors has been extensively studied due to its ability to more accurately represent the complex dynamic characteristics of the biological nervous system. Currently, the mathematical model of memristor used to couple neural networks mainly focuses on primary function, absolute value function, hyperbolic tangent function, etc. To further enrich the memristor-coupled neural network model and take into account the motion law of particles in some doped semiconductors, a new compound exponential local active memristor is proposed and used as a coupling synapse in the Hopfield neural network. Using the basic dynamic analysis method, the system’s dynamic behaviors are studied under different parameters and the coexistence of multiple bifurcation modes under different initial values. In addition, the influence of frequency change of external stimulation current on the system is also studied. The experimental results show that the internal parameters of memristor synapses regulate the system, and the system has a rich dynamic behavior, including symmetric attractor coexistence, asymmetric attractor coexistence, large-scale chaos as shown in attached figure, and bursting oscillation. Finally, the hardware of the system is realized by the STM32 microcontroller, and the experimental results verify the realization of the system.
-
Keywords:
- locally active memristor /
- Hopfield neural network /
- multiple coexisting attractor /
- bursting oscillation
[1] Chua L 1971 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 18 507
Google Scholar
[2] Chua L 2014 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 29 104001
Google Scholar
[3] Wang M J, Deng Y, Liao X H, Li Z J, Ma M L, Zeng Y C 2019 Int. J. Non. Linear. Mech. 111 149
Google Scholar
[4] Peng Y X, Liu J, He S B, Sun K H 2023 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 171 113429
Google Scholar
[5] Wang M J, An M Y, He S B, Zhang X N, Iu H H, Li Z J 2023 Chaos 33 073129
Google Scholar
[6] Peng Y X, He S B, Sun K H 2022 Nonlinear Dyn. 107 1263
Google Scholar
[7] He S B, Liu J, Wang H H, Sun K H 2023 Neurocomputing (Amst. ) 523 1
Google Scholar
[8] 古亚娜, 梁燕, 王光义, 夏晨阳 2022 物理学报 71 110501
Google Scholar
Gu Y N, Liang Y, Wang G Y, Xia C Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 110501
Google Scholar
[9] 武长春, 周莆钧, 王俊杰, 李国, 胡绍刚, 于奇, 刘洋 2022 物理学报 71 148401
Google Scholar
Wu C C, Zhou P J, Wang J J, Li G, Hu S G, Yu Q, Liu Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 148401
Google Scholar
[10] Chua L 2013 Nanotechnology 24 383001
Google Scholar
[11] Lu Y C, Li H M, Li C L 2023 Neurocomputing (Amst. ) 544 126246
Google Scholar
[12] Li Z J, Chen K J 2023 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 175 114017
Google Scholar
[13] Hopfield J J 1984 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81 3088
Google Scholar
[14] Chen C J, Chen J Q, Bao H, Chen M, Bao B C 2019 Nonlinear Dyn. 95 3385
Google Scholar
[15] Lin H R, Wang C H, Hong Q H, Sun Y C 2020 IEEE Tran. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 67 3472
Google Scholar
[16] Chen C J, Min F H, Zhang Y Z, Bao B C 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 106 2559
Google Scholar
[17] Li C L, Yang Y Y, Yang X B, Zi X Y, Xiao F L 2022 Nonlinear Dyn. 108 1697
Google Scholar
[18] Doubla I S, Ramakrishnan B, Njitacke Z T, Kengne J, Rajagopal K 2022 Int. J. Electron. Commun. 144 154059
Google Scholar
[19] 黄丽丽, 黄强, 黄振, 臧红岩, 雷腾飞 2023 电子元件与材料 42 10
Google Scholar
Huang L L, Huang Q, Huang Z, Zang H Y, Lei T F 2023 Electron. Compon. Mater. 42 10
Google Scholar
[20] Lin H R, Wang C H, Sun J R, Zhang X, Sun Y C, Iu H H C 2023 Chaos Solitons Fractals 166 112905
Google Scholar
[21] Wan Q Z, Chen S M, Yang Q, Liu J, Sun K L 2023 Nonlinear Dyn. 111 18505
Google Scholar
[22] Lin H R, Wang C H, Yu F, Sun J R, Du S C, Deng Z K, Deng Q L 2023 Mathematics (Basel) 11 1369
Google Scholar
[23] Panahi S, Aram Z, Jafari S, Ma J, Sprott J C 2017 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 105 150
Google Scholar
[24] Guevara M R, Glass L, Mackey M C, Shrier A 1983 IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 5 790
Google Scholar
[25] Chua L 2018 Appl. Phys. A: Mater. 124 563
Google Scholar
[26] Chua L 2005 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 15 3435
Google Scholar
[27] Ascoli A, Slesazeck S, Mähne H, Tetzlaff R, Mikolajick T 2015 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 62 1165
Google Scholar
[28] Chua L 2015 Radioengineering 24 319
Google Scholar
[29] Wang M J, Li J H, Yu S S, Zhang X N, Li Z J, Iu H H C 2020 Chaos 30 043125
Google Scholar
[30] Bi Q S, Gou J T 2023 Chaos Solitons Fractals 167 113046
Google Scholar
[31] 莱维坦 I B, 卡茨玛克 L K著 (舒斯云, 包新民 译) 2001 神经元: 细胞和分子生物学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第43—44页
Levitan I B, Kaczmarek L K (translated by Shu S Y, Bao X M) 2001 The Neuron: Cell and Molecular Biology (Beijing: Science Press) pp43–44
[32] Jokar E, Abolfathi H, Ahmadi A, Ahmadi M 2019 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 66 2336
Google Scholar
[33] Li K X, Bao H, Li H Z, Ma J, Hua Z Y, Bao B C 2021 IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 18 1726
Google Scholar
[34] Lin H R, Wang C H, Chen C J, Sun Y C, Zhou C, Xu C, Hong Q H 2021 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 68 3397
Google Scholar
-
图 1 G(x)与k1, m1, m2之间的关系图 (a) m1 = 3, m2 = –3时, k1与G(x)之间的关系图; (b) k1 = 1, m2 = –3时, m1与G(x)之间的关系图; (c) k1 = 1, m1 = 3时, m2与G(x)之间的关系图
Fig. 1. Relationship between G(x) and k1, m1 and m2: (a) Relationship between k1 and G(x) when m1 = 3 and m2 = –3; (b) the relationship between m1 and G(x) when k1 = 1 and m2 = –3; (c) the relationship between m2 and G(x) when k1 = 1 and m1 = 3.
图 2 忆阻器的滞回曲线和时域波形 (a) 不同幅值下的迟滞回线; (b) 不同频率下的迟滞回线; (c) 电压和电流的时域波形
Fig. 2. Hysteresis curves and time domain waveforms of memristor: (a) Hysteresis curves at different amplitudes; (b) hysteresis curves at different frequencies; (c) time domain waveforms of voltage and current.
图 5 不同初始值下系统关于m1的分岔图 (a) (–2, 1, 1, 1, 6); (b) (–2, 1, 1, 1, 6.5); (c) (–2, 1, 1, 1, 8)
Fig. 5. Bifurcation diagram of the system about m1 under different initial values: (a) (–2, 1, 1, 1, 6); (b) (–2, 1, 1, 1, 6.5); (c) (–2, 1, 1, 1, 8).
图 6 x1-x3平面共存非对称吸引子相图 (a) m1 = 0.01; (b) m1 = 0.05; (c) m1 = 0.1; (d) m1 = 0.83; (e) m1 = 1.13; (f) m1 = 2.5
Fig. 6. Coexistence asymmetric attractor phase diagram of the x1-x3 plane: (a) m1 = 0.01; (b) m1 = 0.05; (c) m1 = 0.1, (d) m1 = 0.83; (e) m1 = 1.13; (f) m1 = 2.5.
图 7 系统的共存分岔图以及x1-x3平面共存对称吸引子相图 (a) 系统的共存分岔图; (b) m1 = 0.01; (c) m1 = 0.1
Fig. 7. Coexistence bifurcation diagram of the system and the coexistence symmetric attractor phase diagram of the x1-x3 plane: (a) Coexistence bifurcation diagram of the system; (b) m1 = 0.01; (c) m1 = 0.1.
图 8 系统关于m2的分岔图(a)及李雅普诺夫指数谱(b)
Fig. 8. Bifurcation diagram (a) and Lyapunov exponent spectrum (b) of the system about m2.
图 10 不同频率下系统的相轨图(a), (c)和时域波形图(b), (d) (a), (b) f = 0.003; (c), (d) f = 0.1
Fig. 10. Phase diagram (a), (c) and time domain waveform diagram (b), (d) of the system at different frequencies: (a), (b) f = 0.003; (c), (d) f = 0.1.
图 13 示波器显示的相轨图(a)—(c)及对应Matlab仿真图(d)—(f) (a), (d) m1 = 0.02; (b), (e) m1 = 1.2; (c), (f) m1 = 2.5
Fig. 13. Oscilloscope display phase track diagram (a)–(c) and the corresponding Matlab simulation diagram (d)–(f): (a), (d) m1 = 0.02; (b), (e) m1 = 1.2; (c), (f) m1 = 2.5.
表 1 a = 2.5, m1 = 0.5, m2 = –3时, 系统平衡点处的特征值及稳定性
Table 1. Eigenvalue and stability at the equilibrium point of the system when a = 2.5, m1 = 0.5 and m2 = –3.
m1 k 特征值 稳定性 0.5 0 1, 1.0399, –3.7032, 0.7316±3.9891i 不稳定的鞍焦点 ±1 –1, 1.4681±2.5644i, –2.0681±40.1411i 不稳定的鞍焦点 ±2 1, 1.4833±2.5761i, –2.0833±927.5014i 不稳定的鞍焦点 ±3 –1, 1.4833±2.5761i, –2.0833±21462.9637i 不稳定的鞍焦点 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Chua L 1971 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 18 507
Google Scholar
[2] Chua L 2014 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 29 104001
Google Scholar
[3] Wang M J, Deng Y, Liao X H, Li Z J, Ma M L, Zeng Y C 2019 Int. J. Non. Linear. Mech. 111 149
Google Scholar
[4] Peng Y X, Liu J, He S B, Sun K H 2023 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 171 113429
Google Scholar
[5] Wang M J, An M Y, He S B, Zhang X N, Iu H H, Li Z J 2023 Chaos 33 073129
Google Scholar
[6] Peng Y X, He S B, Sun K H 2022 Nonlinear Dyn. 107 1263
Google Scholar
[7] He S B, Liu J, Wang H H, Sun K H 2023 Neurocomputing (Amst. ) 523 1
Google Scholar
[8] 古亚娜, 梁燕, 王光义, 夏晨阳 2022 物理学报 71 110501
Google Scholar
Gu Y N, Liang Y, Wang G Y, Xia C Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 110501
Google Scholar
[9] 武长春, 周莆钧, 王俊杰, 李国, 胡绍刚, 于奇, 刘洋 2022 物理学报 71 148401
Google Scholar
Wu C C, Zhou P J, Wang J J, Li G, Hu S G, Yu Q, Liu Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 148401
Google Scholar
[10] Chua L 2013 Nanotechnology 24 383001
Google Scholar
[11] Lu Y C, Li H M, Li C L 2023 Neurocomputing (Amst. ) 544 126246
Google Scholar
[12] Li Z J, Chen K J 2023 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 175 114017
Google Scholar
[13] Hopfield J J 1984 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81 3088
Google Scholar
[14] Chen C J, Chen J Q, Bao H, Chen M, Bao B C 2019 Nonlinear Dyn. 95 3385
Google Scholar
[15] Lin H R, Wang C H, Hong Q H, Sun Y C 2020 IEEE Tran. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 67 3472
Google Scholar
[16] Chen C J, Min F H, Zhang Y Z, Bao B C 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 106 2559
Google Scholar
[17] Li C L, Yang Y Y, Yang X B, Zi X Y, Xiao F L 2022 Nonlinear Dyn. 108 1697
Google Scholar
[18] Doubla I S, Ramakrishnan B, Njitacke Z T, Kengne J, Rajagopal K 2022 Int. J. Electron. Commun. 144 154059
Google Scholar
[19] 黄丽丽, 黄强, 黄振, 臧红岩, 雷腾飞 2023 电子元件与材料 42 10
Google Scholar
Huang L L, Huang Q, Huang Z, Zang H Y, Lei T F 2023 Electron. Compon. Mater. 42 10
Google Scholar
[20] Lin H R, Wang C H, Sun J R, Zhang X, Sun Y C, Iu H H C 2023 Chaos Solitons Fractals 166 112905
Google Scholar
[21] Wan Q Z, Chen S M, Yang Q, Liu J, Sun K L 2023 Nonlinear Dyn. 111 18505
Google Scholar
[22] Lin H R, Wang C H, Yu F, Sun J R, Du S C, Deng Z K, Deng Q L 2023 Mathematics (Basel) 11 1369
Google Scholar
[23] Panahi S, Aram Z, Jafari S, Ma J, Sprott J C 2017 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 105 150
Google Scholar
[24] Guevara M R, Glass L, Mackey M C, Shrier A 1983 IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 5 790
Google Scholar
[25] Chua L 2018 Appl. Phys. A: Mater. 124 563
Google Scholar
[26] Chua L 2005 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 15 3435
Google Scholar
[27] Ascoli A, Slesazeck S, Mähne H, Tetzlaff R, Mikolajick T 2015 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 62 1165
Google Scholar
[28] Chua L 2015 Radioengineering 24 319
Google Scholar
[29] Wang M J, Li J H, Yu S S, Zhang X N, Li Z J, Iu H H C 2020 Chaos 30 043125
Google Scholar
[30] Bi Q S, Gou J T 2023 Chaos Solitons Fractals 167 113046
Google Scholar
[31] 莱维坦 I B, 卡茨玛克 L K著 (舒斯云, 包新民 译) 2001 神经元: 细胞和分子生物学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第43—44页
Levitan I B, Kaczmarek L K (translated by Shu S Y, Bao X M) 2001 The Neuron: Cell and Molecular Biology (Beijing: Science Press) pp43–44
[32] Jokar E, Abolfathi H, Ahmadi A, Ahmadi M 2019 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 66 2336
Google Scholar
[33] Li K X, Bao H, Li H Z, Ma J, Hua Z Y, Bao B C 2021 IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 18 1726
Google Scholar
[34] Lin H R, Wang C H, Chen C J, Sun Y C, Zhou C, Xu C, Hong Q H 2021 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 68 3397
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 1740
- PDF下载量: 70
- 被引次数: 0
