-
为解决氮化镓芯片散热问题, 采用非平衡分子动力学法, 研究工作温度、界面尺寸、缺陷率及缺陷类型对氮化镓/石墨烯/金刚石异质界面热导的影响, 通过计算声子态密度和声子参与率, 分析界面热传导机理. 研究发现, 在100—500 K范围内, 温度升高使界面热导增大2.1倍, 重叠因子随温度增加而增加, 界面间声子耦合程度增强, 界面热导相应增大. 当氮化镓层数从10层增加到26层时, 界面热导降低75%, 分析认为是界面声子耦合程度下降导致. 另外, 添加5层石墨烯会导致界面热导降低74%, 分析认为是声子局域化程度加重造成; 当缺陷率从0增大到10%时, 金刚石碳原子缺陷使界面热导提高40%, 缺陷散射增加低频声子数量, 改善界面热传导; 但镓、氮和石墨烯碳原子缺陷会加重声子局域化程度, 均导致界面热导降低. 研究结果有助于提升氮化镓芯片散热性能, 同时对高可靠性氮化镓器件设计具有指导意义.
Gallium nitride chips are widely used in high-frequency and high-power devices. However, thermal management is a serious challenge for gallium nitride devices. To improve thermal dissipation of gallium nitride devices, the nonequilibrium molecular dynamics method is employed to investigate the effects of operating temperature, interface size, defect density and defect types on the interfacial thermal conductance of gallium nitride/graphene/diamond heterostructure. Furthermore, the phonon state densities and phonon participation ratios under various conditions are calculated to analyze the interface thermal conduction mechanism. The results indicate that interfacial thermal conductance increases with temperatures rising, highlighting the inherent self-regulating heat dissipation capabilities of heterogeneous. The interfacial thermal conductance of monolayer graphene structures is increased by 2.1 times as the temperature increases from 100 to 500 K. This is attributed to the overlap factor increasing with temperature rising, which enhances the phonon coupling between interfaces, leading the interfacial thermal conductance to increase. Additionally, in the study it is found that increasing the number of layers of both gallium nitride and graphene leads the interfacial thermal conductance to decrease. When the number of gallium nitride layers increases from 10 to 26, the interfacial thermal conductance decreases by 75%. The overlap factor diminishing with the layer number increasing is ascribed to the decreased match of phonon vibrations between interfaces, resulting in lower thermal transfer efficiency. Similarly, when the number of graphene layers increases from 1 to 5, the interfacial thermal conductance decreases by 74%. The increase in graphene layers leads the low-frequency phonons to decrease, consequently lowering the interfacial thermal conductance. Moreover, multilayer graphene enhances phonon localization, exacerbates the reduction in interfacial thermal conductance. It is found that introducing four types of vacancy defects can affect the interfacial thermal conductance. Diamond carbon atom defects lead its interfacial thermal conductance to increase, whereas defects in gallium, nitrogen, and graphene carbon atoms cause their interfacial thermal conductance to decrease. As the defect concentration increases from 0 to 10%, diamond carbon atom defects increase the interfacial thermal conductance by 40% due to defect scattering, which increases the number of low-frequency phonon modes and expands the channels for interfacial heat transfer, thus improving the interfacial thermal conductance. Defects in graphene intensify the degree of graphene phonon localization, consequently leading the interfacial thermal conductance to decrease. Gallium and nitrogen defects both intensify the phonon localization of gallium nitride, impeding phonon transport channels. Moreover, gallium defects induce more severe phonon localization than nitrogen defects, consequently leading to lower interfacial thermal conductance. This research provides the references for manufacturing highly reliable gallium nitride devices and the widespread use of gallium nitride heterostructures. -
Keywords:
- interface thermal conductance /
- temperature effect /
- size effect /
- vacancy defect
[1] 刘庆彬, 蔚翠, 郭建超, 马孟宇, 何泽召, 周闯杰, 高学栋, 余浩, 冯志红 2023 物理学报 72 098104Google Scholar
Liu Q B, Yu C, Guo J C, Ma M Y, He Z Z, Zhou C J, Gao X D, Yu H, Feng Z H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 098104Google Scholar
[2] 贾鑫, 魏俊俊, 黄亚博, 邵思武, 孔月婵, 刘金龙, 陈良贤, 李成明, 叶海涛 2020 表面技术 49 111
Jia X, Wei J J, Huang Y B, Shao S W, Kong Y C, Liu J L, Chen L X, Li C M, Ye H T 2020 Surf. Technol. 49 111
[3] Wu Y J, Fang L, Xu Y 2019 npj Comput. Mater. 5 1Google Scholar
[4] 冯家驹, 范亚明, 房丹, 邓旭光, 于国浩, 魏志鹏, 张宝顺 2022 人工晶体学报 51 730Google Scholar
Feng J J, Fan Y M, Fang D, Deng X G, Yu G H, Wei Z P, Zhang B S 2022 J. Synth. Cryst. 51 730Google Scholar
[5] Francis D, Faili F, Babić D, Ejeckam F, Nurmikko A, Maris H 2010 Diamond Relat. Mater. 19 229Google Scholar
[6] Cho J, Francis D, Altman D H, Asheghi M, Goodson K E 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 055105Google Scholar
[7] Zhou Y, Anaya J, Pomeroy J, Sun H, Gu X, Xie A, Beam E, Becker M, Grotjohn T A, Lee C, Kuball M 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 34416Google Scholar
[8] Huang X, Guo Z 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 178 121613Google Scholar
[9] Mu F, Xu B, Wang X, et al. 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 905 164076Google Scholar
[10] Tao L, Theruvakkattil Sreenivasan S, Shahsavari R 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 989Google Scholar
[11] Jia X, Huang L, Sun M, Zhao X, Wei J, Li C 2022 Coatings 12 672Google Scholar
[12] Qi Z, Shen W, Li R, Sun X, Li L, Wang Q, Wu G, Liang K 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. 615 156419Google Scholar
[13] Middleton C, Chandrasekar H, Singh M, et al. 2019 Appl. Phys. Express 12 024003Google Scholar
[14] Wu L, Sun X, Gong F, Luo J, Yin C, Sun Z, Xiao R 2022 Nanomaterials 12 894Google Scholar
[15] Liu F, Zou R, Hu N, Ning H, Yan C, Liu Y, Wu L, Mo F, Fu S 2019 Nanoscale 11 4067Google Scholar
[16] Hu S, Ju S, Shao C, Guo J, Xu B, Ohnishi M, Shiomi J 2021 Mater. Today Phys. 16 100324Google Scholar
[17] Hu M, Poulikakos D 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 62 205Google Scholar
[18] Mischke J, Pennings J, Weisenseel E, Kerger P, Rohwerder M, Mertin W, Bacher G 2020 2D Mater. 7 035019Google Scholar
[19] Suntornwipat N, Aitkulova A, Djurberg V, Majdi S 2023 Thin Solid Films 770 139766Google Scholar
[20] Shen B, Ji Z, Lin Q, Gong P, Xuan N, Chen S, Liu H, Huang Z, Xiao T, Sun Z 2022 Chem. Mater. 34 3941Google Scholar
[21] Jiang M, Chen C, Wang P, Guo D, Han S, Li X, Lu S, Hu X 2022 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119 e2201451119Google Scholar
[22] Li D, Zou W, Jiang W, Peng X, Song S, Qin Q H, Xue J M 2020 Ceram. Int. 46 10885Google Scholar
[23] Badokas K, Kadys A, Mickevičius J, Ignatjev I, Skapas M, Stanionytė S, Radiunas E, Juška G, Malinauskas T 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 205103Google Scholar
[24] Barbier C, Largeau L, Gogneau N, et al. 2023 Cryst. Growth Des. 23 6517Google Scholar
[25] Sun H, Simon R, Pomeroy J, Francis D, Faili F, Twitchen D, Kuball M 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 111906Google Scholar
[26] Wang J, Shen Y, Yang P 2023 Compos. Commun. 40 101616Google Scholar
[27] Tang Y, Liu J K, Yu Z H, Sun L G, Zhu L L 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 066502Google Scholar
[28] Liu D 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126077Google Scholar
[29] Ou B, Yan J, Wang Q, Lu L 2022 Molecules 27 905Google Scholar
[30] Sang L X, Li Z K 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 103105 [桑丽霞, 李志康 2024 物理学报 73 103105]Google Scholar
Sang L X, Li Z K 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 103105Google Scholar
[31] 刘东静, 周福, 陈帅阳, 胡志亮 2023 物理学报 72 157901Google Scholar
Liu D J, Zhou F, Chen S Y, Hu Z L, 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 157901Google Scholar
[32] Qu G D, Deng Z Y, Guo W, et al. 2023 IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 13 816Google Scholar
[33] Wu B Y, Zhou M, Xu D J, Liu J J, Tang R J, Zhang P 2022 Surf. Interfaces 32 102119Google Scholar
[34] Tang Y Q, Zhang Z, Li L, Guo J, Yang P 2022 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 171 107231Google Scholar
[35] Wu X, Han Q 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 32564Google Scholar
[36] Huang H, Zhong Y, Cai B, Wang J, Liu Z, Peng Q 2023 Surf. Interfaces 37 102736Google Scholar
[37] Ma D, Zhang L 2020 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32 425001Google Scholar
[38] Danilchenko B A, Paszkiewicz T, Wolski S, JeŻowski A, Plackowski T 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 061901Google Scholar
[39] 刘东静, 王韶铭, 杨平 2021 物理学报 70 187302Google Scholar
Liu D J, Wang S M, Yang P 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 187302Google Scholar
[40] Yang N, Luo T, Esfarjani K, et al. 2015 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 12 168Google Scholar
[41] Liu Y, Qiu L, Liu J, Feng Y 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 209 124123Google Scholar
[42] Wei N, Zhou C, Li Z, Ou B, Zhao K, Yu P, Li S, Zhao J 2022 Mater. Today Commun. 30 103147Google Scholar
[43] Li M, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Liao Y, Zhou H 2018 Carbon 130 295Google Scholar
[44] Esfahani M N, Jabbari M, Xu Y, Soutis C 2021 Mater. Today Commun. 26 101856Google Scholar
[45] Liu X, Zhang G, Zhang Y W 2016 Nano Lett. 16 4954Google Scholar
[46] Wu K, Zhang L, Li F, et al. 2024 Carbon 223 119021Google Scholar
[47] Loh G C, Teo E, Tay B K 2011 Diamond Relat. Mater. 20 1137Google Scholar
[48] Yang B, Yang H, Li T, Yang J, Yang P 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 536 147828Google Scholar
[49] Koh Y R, Bin Hoque M S, Ahmad H, et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 104604Google Scholar
[50] Li Y, Zhao Q, Liu Y, Huang M, Ouyang X P 2024 Phys. Scr. 99 025944Google Scholar
[51] Liu Y, Qiu L, Wang Z, Li H, Feng Y 2024 Composites, Part A 178 108008Google Scholar
[52] Wu S, Wang J, Xie H, Guo Z 2020 Energies 13 5851Google Scholar
[53] Yang Y, Ma J, Yang J, Zhang Y 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 45742Google Scholar
[54] Yang C, Wang J, Ma D, Li Z, He Z, Liu L, Fu Z, Yang J Y 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 214 124433Google Scholar
-
表 1 晶格参数
Table 1. Lattice parameters.
方向 氮化镓 石墨烯 金刚石 x 3.21629 2.46000 3.56679 y 5.57078 4.26084 3.56679 z 5.23966 3.56679 表 2 L-J势函数参数
Table 2. Lennard-Jones parameters.
原子1 原子2 $ \varepsilon $/eV $ \sigma $/Å C C 0.00361 3.671 C Ga 0.00905 3.668 C N 0.00369 3.346 -
[1] 刘庆彬, 蔚翠, 郭建超, 马孟宇, 何泽召, 周闯杰, 高学栋, 余浩, 冯志红 2023 物理学报 72 098104Google Scholar
Liu Q B, Yu C, Guo J C, Ma M Y, He Z Z, Zhou C J, Gao X D, Yu H, Feng Z H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 098104Google Scholar
[2] 贾鑫, 魏俊俊, 黄亚博, 邵思武, 孔月婵, 刘金龙, 陈良贤, 李成明, 叶海涛 2020 表面技术 49 111
Jia X, Wei J J, Huang Y B, Shao S W, Kong Y C, Liu J L, Chen L X, Li C M, Ye H T 2020 Surf. Technol. 49 111
[3] Wu Y J, Fang L, Xu Y 2019 npj Comput. Mater. 5 1Google Scholar
[4] 冯家驹, 范亚明, 房丹, 邓旭光, 于国浩, 魏志鹏, 张宝顺 2022 人工晶体学报 51 730Google Scholar
Feng J J, Fan Y M, Fang D, Deng X G, Yu G H, Wei Z P, Zhang B S 2022 J. Synth. Cryst. 51 730Google Scholar
[5] Francis D, Faili F, Babić D, Ejeckam F, Nurmikko A, Maris H 2010 Diamond Relat. Mater. 19 229Google Scholar
[6] Cho J, Francis D, Altman D H, Asheghi M, Goodson K E 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 055105Google Scholar
[7] Zhou Y, Anaya J, Pomeroy J, Sun H, Gu X, Xie A, Beam E, Becker M, Grotjohn T A, Lee C, Kuball M 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 34416Google Scholar
[8] Huang X, Guo Z 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 178 121613Google Scholar
[9] Mu F, Xu B, Wang X, et al. 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 905 164076Google Scholar
[10] Tao L, Theruvakkattil Sreenivasan S, Shahsavari R 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 989Google Scholar
[11] Jia X, Huang L, Sun M, Zhao X, Wei J, Li C 2022 Coatings 12 672Google Scholar
[12] Qi Z, Shen W, Li R, Sun X, Li L, Wang Q, Wu G, Liang K 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. 615 156419Google Scholar
[13] Middleton C, Chandrasekar H, Singh M, et al. 2019 Appl. Phys. Express 12 024003Google Scholar
[14] Wu L, Sun X, Gong F, Luo J, Yin C, Sun Z, Xiao R 2022 Nanomaterials 12 894Google Scholar
[15] Liu F, Zou R, Hu N, Ning H, Yan C, Liu Y, Wu L, Mo F, Fu S 2019 Nanoscale 11 4067Google Scholar
[16] Hu S, Ju S, Shao C, Guo J, Xu B, Ohnishi M, Shiomi J 2021 Mater. Today Phys. 16 100324Google Scholar
[17] Hu M, Poulikakos D 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 62 205Google Scholar
[18] Mischke J, Pennings J, Weisenseel E, Kerger P, Rohwerder M, Mertin W, Bacher G 2020 2D Mater. 7 035019Google Scholar
[19] Suntornwipat N, Aitkulova A, Djurberg V, Majdi S 2023 Thin Solid Films 770 139766Google Scholar
[20] Shen B, Ji Z, Lin Q, Gong P, Xuan N, Chen S, Liu H, Huang Z, Xiao T, Sun Z 2022 Chem. Mater. 34 3941Google Scholar
[21] Jiang M, Chen C, Wang P, Guo D, Han S, Li X, Lu S, Hu X 2022 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119 e2201451119Google Scholar
[22] Li D, Zou W, Jiang W, Peng X, Song S, Qin Q H, Xue J M 2020 Ceram. Int. 46 10885Google Scholar
[23] Badokas K, Kadys A, Mickevičius J, Ignatjev I, Skapas M, Stanionytė S, Radiunas E, Juška G, Malinauskas T 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 205103Google Scholar
[24] Barbier C, Largeau L, Gogneau N, et al. 2023 Cryst. Growth Des. 23 6517Google Scholar
[25] Sun H, Simon R, Pomeroy J, Francis D, Faili F, Twitchen D, Kuball M 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 111906Google Scholar
[26] Wang J, Shen Y, Yang P 2023 Compos. Commun. 40 101616Google Scholar
[27] Tang Y, Liu J K, Yu Z H, Sun L G, Zhu L L 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 066502Google Scholar
[28] Liu D 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126077Google Scholar
[29] Ou B, Yan J, Wang Q, Lu L 2022 Molecules 27 905Google Scholar
[30] Sang L X, Li Z K 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 103105 [桑丽霞, 李志康 2024 物理学报 73 103105]Google Scholar
Sang L X, Li Z K 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 103105Google Scholar
[31] 刘东静, 周福, 陈帅阳, 胡志亮 2023 物理学报 72 157901Google Scholar
Liu D J, Zhou F, Chen S Y, Hu Z L, 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 157901Google Scholar
[32] Qu G D, Deng Z Y, Guo W, et al. 2023 IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 13 816Google Scholar
[33] Wu B Y, Zhou M, Xu D J, Liu J J, Tang R J, Zhang P 2022 Surf. Interfaces 32 102119Google Scholar
[34] Tang Y Q, Zhang Z, Li L, Guo J, Yang P 2022 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 171 107231Google Scholar
[35] Wu X, Han Q 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 32564Google Scholar
[36] Huang H, Zhong Y, Cai B, Wang J, Liu Z, Peng Q 2023 Surf. Interfaces 37 102736Google Scholar
[37] Ma D, Zhang L 2020 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32 425001Google Scholar
[38] Danilchenko B A, Paszkiewicz T, Wolski S, JeŻowski A, Plackowski T 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 061901Google Scholar
[39] 刘东静, 王韶铭, 杨平 2021 物理学报 70 187302Google Scholar
Liu D J, Wang S M, Yang P 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 187302Google Scholar
[40] Yang N, Luo T, Esfarjani K, et al. 2015 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 12 168Google Scholar
[41] Liu Y, Qiu L, Liu J, Feng Y 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 209 124123Google Scholar
[42] Wei N, Zhou C, Li Z, Ou B, Zhao K, Yu P, Li S, Zhao J 2022 Mater. Today Commun. 30 103147Google Scholar
[43] Li M, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Liao Y, Zhou H 2018 Carbon 130 295Google Scholar
[44] Esfahani M N, Jabbari M, Xu Y, Soutis C 2021 Mater. Today Commun. 26 101856Google Scholar
[45] Liu X, Zhang G, Zhang Y W 2016 Nano Lett. 16 4954Google Scholar
[46] Wu K, Zhang L, Li F, et al. 2024 Carbon 223 119021Google Scholar
[47] Loh G C, Teo E, Tay B K 2011 Diamond Relat. Mater. 20 1137Google Scholar
[48] Yang B, Yang H, Li T, Yang J, Yang P 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 536 147828Google Scholar
[49] Koh Y R, Bin Hoque M S, Ahmad H, et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 104604Google Scholar
[50] Li Y, Zhao Q, Liu Y, Huang M, Ouyang X P 2024 Phys. Scr. 99 025944Google Scholar
[51] Liu Y, Qiu L, Wang Z, Li H, Feng Y 2024 Composites, Part A 178 108008Google Scholar
[52] Wu S, Wang J, Xie H, Guo Z 2020 Energies 13 5851Google Scholar
[53] Yang Y, Ma J, Yang J, Zhang Y 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 45742Google Scholar
[54] Yang C, Wang J, Ma D, Li Z, He Z, Liu L, Fu Z, Yang J Y 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 214 124433Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 1859
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0