-
An elliptical dielectric nanowire waveguide with a nested eccentric hollow cylinder is designed, the inner surface and the outer surface of the waveguide are both coated with graphene. The transmission characteristics of the three lowest order modes supported by the waveguide, i.e. the field distribution, the real part of the effective refractive index, the propagation length, and the quality factor, are obtained by multipole method. The results show that the three lowest order modes of the waveguide can be synthesized by the lowest order modes supported by a single cylinder and an elliptic cylinder coated with graphene. With the increase of the radius of the embedded cylinder, the three evaluation indexes of the waveguide increase slightly. The change of the semi major axis of the ellipse will slightly increase the real part of the effective refractive index, propagation length and quality factor of Mode 0 and Mode 1, while Mode2 will slightly decrease. When
$a = {{b}} = 170\;{\rm{nm}}$ , the performance of the circular nested circular waveguide becomes slightly worse than that of the structure in this paper. With the decrease of the semi minor axis of the ellipse, the real part of the effective refractive index, propagation length and quality factor for each of the three modes increase to a certain extent, and have the greatest impact on Mode 1. When${{b}} = {{a}} = 190\;{\rm{nm}}$ , the transmission performance of the circular nested circular waveguide is not so good as that of the structure in this paper. When the distance between the inner rod and the outer rod on the right side increases, the real part of the effective refractive index for each of the three modes decreases, the propagation length and quality factor of Mode 0 and Mode1 gradually decrease, while the propagation length of Mode 2 increases slightly, and the quality factor is basically unchanged. On the contrary, the mode transmission performance can be significantly improved by increasing the working wavelength and Fermi energy and reducing the dielectric constant of elliptical dielectric nanowires. Compared with the circular dielectric nanowire waveguide nested with an eccentric hollow cylinder coated with graphene, the waveguide designed in this paper can be found to have a good transmission performance. These results are verified by the finite element method. This waveguide can provide a theoretical basis for the design, fabrication and application of nested waveguides of the same type.-
Keywords:
- graphene /
- nanowires /
- waveguides /
- multipole method
[1] Maier S A 2007 Plasmonics: fundamentals and applications (New York: Springer) p21
[2] Yang L K, Li P, Wang H C, Li Z P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 094216
[3] Jablan M, Buljan H, Soljacic M 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 245435Google Scholar
[4] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[5] Koppens F H L, Chang D E, de Abajo F J G 2011 Nano Lett. 11 3370
[6] de Abajo F J G 2014 ACS Photonics 1 135Google Scholar
[7] Castro Neto A H, Guinea F, Peres N M R, Novoselov K S, Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 109Google Scholar
[8] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Katsnelson M I, Grigorieva I V, Dubonos S V, Firsov A A 2005 Nature 438 197Google Scholar
[9] Geim A K, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183Google Scholar
[10] 滕达, 王凯, 李哲, 曹清, 唐亚楠, 赵永哲, 刘子怡, 张韵雯, 郭荣珍 2020 光学学报 40 0623002Google Scholar
Teng D, Wang K, Li Z, Cao Q, Tang Y N, Zhao Y Z, Liu Z Y, Zhang Y W, Guo R Z 2020 Acta Opt. Sin. 40 0623002Google Scholar
[11] Li Z Q, Henriksen E A, Jiang Z, Hao Z, Martin M C, Kim P, Stormer H L, Basov D N 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 532Google Scholar
[12] Teng D, Wang K 2021 Nanomaterials 11 210Google Scholar
[13] 秦康 2016 硕士学位论文 (浙江: 中国计量大学)
Qin K 2016 M. S. Thesis (Zhejiang: China Jiliang University) (in Chinese)
[14] Wen B, Cao M S, Lu M M, Cao W Q, Shi H L, Liu J, Wang X X, Jin H B, Fang X Y, Wang W Z, Yuan J 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 3484Google Scholar
[15] Zhang M, Cao M S, Shu J C, Cao W Q, Li L, Yuan J 2021 Mat. Sci. Eng. R. 145 100627Google Scholar
[16] Vakil A, Engheta N 2011 Science 332 1291Google Scholar
[17] Gao Y X, Ren G B, Zhu B F, Liu H Q, Lian Y D, Jian S S 2014 Opt. Express 22 24322Google Scholar
[18] Yang J F, Yang J J, Deng W, Mao F C, Huang M 2015 Opt. Express 23 32289Google Scholar
[19] 彭艳玲, 薛文瑞, 卫壮志, 李昌勇 2018 物理学报 67 038102Google Scholar
Peng Y L, Xue W R, Wei Z Z, Li C Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 038102Google Scholar
[20] Teng D, Wang K, Li Z, Zhao Y Z, Zhao G, Li H Y, Wang H 2019 Appl. Sci-Basel. 9 2351Google Scholar
[21] Cheng X, Xue W R, Wei Z Z, Dong H Y, Li C Y 2019 Opt. Commun. 452 467Google Scholar
[22] White T P, Kuhlmey B T, McPhedran R C, Maystre D, Renversez G, Sterke C M, Botten L C 2002 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19 2322Google Scholar
[23] Bao Q L, Loh K P 2012 ACS Nano 6 3677Google Scholar
[24] Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari A C 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 611Google Scholar
[25] 翟利, 薛文瑞, 杨荣草, 韩丽萍 2015 光学学报 35 1123001Google Scholar
Zhai L, Xue W R, Yang R C, Han L P 2015 Acta Opt. Sin. 35 1123001Google Scholar
[26] Schedin F, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Hill E W, Blake P, Katsnelson M I, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 652Google Scholar
[27] Zhang J, Boyd A, Tselev A, Paranjape M, Barbara P 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 123112Google Scholar
[28] 郭亚楠, 薛文瑞, 张文梅 2009 物理学报 58 4168Google Scholar
Guo Y N, Xue W R, Zhang W M 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 4168Google Scholar
[29] 邓新华, 刘江涛, 袁吉任, 王同标 2015 物理学报 64 057801Google Scholar
Deng X H, Liu J T, Yuan J R, Wang T B 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 057801Google Scholar
[30] Nikitin A Y, Guinea F, Garcia-Vidal F J, Martin-Moreno L 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 195446Google Scholar
[31] Chen K, Zhou X, Cheng X, Qiao R X, Cheng Y, Liu C, Xie Y D, Yu W T, Yao F R, Sun Z P, Wang F, Liu K H, Liu Z F 2019 Nat. Photonics 13 754Google Scholar
[32] Erricolo D, Carluccio G 2013 ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 40 153
[33] Teng D, Wang K, Li Z, Zhao Y Z 2019 Opt. Express 27 12458Google Scholar
[34] Xing R, Jian S S 2017 IEEE Photonic Tech. L. 29 1643Google Scholar
[35] Ye S, Wang Z X, Sun C R, Dong C B, Wei B Z, Wu B L, Jian S S 2018 Opt. Express 26 23854Google Scholar
-
图 2 模式有效折射率实部(a)、传播长度(b)及品质因数(c)随
$\lambda $ 的变化关系图; λ = 6 μm (d), λ = 8 μm (e), λ = 10 μm (f)时Mode0的电场强度分布图Figure 2. The diagram of the real part of effective refractive index (a), propagation length (b) and FOM (c) with
$\lambda $ ; the electric field intensity distribution of Mode0 when λ = 6 μm (d), λ = 8 μm (e), λ = 10 μm (f).图 3 有效模式折射率实部(a)、传播长度(b)及品质因数(c)随费米能Ef 的变化关系图; Ef = 0.45 eV(d), Ef = 0.57 eV(e)和Ef = 0.69 eV(f)时Mode0的电场强度分布图
Figure 3. The diagram of the real part of effective refractive index (a), propagation length (b) and FOM (c) with Ef ; the electric field intensity distribution of Mode0 when Ef = 0.45 eV(d), Ef = 0.57 eV(e) and Ef = 0.69 eV(f).
图 4 有效模式折射率实部(a)、传播长度(b)及品质因数(c)随
${\rho _0}$ 的变化关系图; ρ0 = 60 nm (d), ρ0 = 80 nm (e), ρ0 = 100 nm (f)时Mode0的电场强度分布图Figure 4. The diagram of the real part of effective refractive index (a), propagation length (b) and FOM (c) with
${\rho _0}$ ; the electric field intensity distribution of Mode0 when ρ0 = 60 nm (d), ρ0 = 80 nm (e), ρ0 = 100 nm (f).图 5 有效模式折射率实部(a), 传播长度(b)及品质因数(c)随
$a$ 的变化关系图; a = 170 nm (d), a = 190 nm (e), a = 210 nm (f)时Mode0的电场强度分布图Figure 5. The variation diagram of the real part of effective refractive index (a), propagation length (b) and FOM (c) with
$a$ ; the electric field intensity distribution of Mode0 when a = 170 nm (d), a = 190 nm (e), a = 210 nm (f).图 6 有效模式折射率实部(a), 传播长度(b)及品质因数(c)随
$ b $ 的变化关系图; b = 150 nm (d), b = 170 nm (e), b = 190 nm (f)时Mode0的电场强度分布图Figure 6. The diagram of the real part of effective refractive index (a), propagation length (b) and FOM (c) with b; the electric field intensity distribution of Mode0 when b = 150 nm (d)、b = 170 nm (e)、b = 190 nm (f).
图 7 有效模式折射率实部(a)、传播长度(b)及品质因数(c)随
$d$ 的变化关系图; d = 55 nm (d), d = 75 nm (e), d = 95 nm (f)时Mode0的电场强度分布图Figure 7. The diagram of the real part of effective refractive index (a), propagation length (b) and FOM (c) with
$d$ ; the electric field intensity distribution of Mode0 when d = 55 nm (d), d = 75 nm (e), d = 95 nm (f).图 8 有效模式折射率实部(a)、传播长度(b)及品质因数(c)随
${\varepsilon _2}$ 的变化关系图;${\varepsilon _2} = 1.3$ (d),${\varepsilon _2} = 2.1$ (e),${\varepsilon _2} = 2.9$ (f)时Mode0的电场强度分布图Figure 8. The variation diagram of the real part of effective refractive index (a), propagation length (b) and FOM (c) with
${\varepsilon _2}$ ; the electric field intensity distribution of Mode0 when${\varepsilon _2} = 1.3$ (d),${\varepsilon _2} = 2.1$ (e),${\varepsilon _2} = 2.9$ (f).表 1 波导所支持的3个最低阶模式的模式合成图、
${E_z}$ 分布图及$|E|$ 分布图Table 1. The pattern synthesis diagram, the distribution diagram of
${E_z}$ and$|E|$ of the three lowest modes supported by the waveguide.模式名称 模式的合成 ${E_z}$ $|E|$ Mode0 Mode1 Mode2 -
[1] Maier S A 2007 Plasmonics: fundamentals and applications (New York: Springer) p21
[2] Yang L K, Li P, Wang H C, Li Z P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 094216
[3] Jablan M, Buljan H, Soljacic M 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 245435Google Scholar
[4] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[5] Koppens F H L, Chang D E, de Abajo F J G 2011 Nano Lett. 11 3370
[6] de Abajo F J G 2014 ACS Photonics 1 135Google Scholar
[7] Castro Neto A H, Guinea F, Peres N M R, Novoselov K S, Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 109Google Scholar
[8] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Katsnelson M I, Grigorieva I V, Dubonos S V, Firsov A A 2005 Nature 438 197Google Scholar
[9] Geim A K, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183Google Scholar
[10] 滕达, 王凯, 李哲, 曹清, 唐亚楠, 赵永哲, 刘子怡, 张韵雯, 郭荣珍 2020 光学学报 40 0623002Google Scholar
Teng D, Wang K, Li Z, Cao Q, Tang Y N, Zhao Y Z, Liu Z Y, Zhang Y W, Guo R Z 2020 Acta Opt. Sin. 40 0623002Google Scholar
[11] Li Z Q, Henriksen E A, Jiang Z, Hao Z, Martin M C, Kim P, Stormer H L, Basov D N 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 532Google Scholar
[12] Teng D, Wang K 2021 Nanomaterials 11 210Google Scholar
[13] 秦康 2016 硕士学位论文 (浙江: 中国计量大学)
Qin K 2016 M. S. Thesis (Zhejiang: China Jiliang University) (in Chinese)
[14] Wen B, Cao M S, Lu M M, Cao W Q, Shi H L, Liu J, Wang X X, Jin H B, Fang X Y, Wang W Z, Yuan J 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 3484Google Scholar
[15] Zhang M, Cao M S, Shu J C, Cao W Q, Li L, Yuan J 2021 Mat. Sci. Eng. R. 145 100627Google Scholar
[16] Vakil A, Engheta N 2011 Science 332 1291Google Scholar
[17] Gao Y X, Ren G B, Zhu B F, Liu H Q, Lian Y D, Jian S S 2014 Opt. Express 22 24322Google Scholar
[18] Yang J F, Yang J J, Deng W, Mao F C, Huang M 2015 Opt. Express 23 32289Google Scholar
[19] 彭艳玲, 薛文瑞, 卫壮志, 李昌勇 2018 物理学报 67 038102Google Scholar
Peng Y L, Xue W R, Wei Z Z, Li C Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 038102Google Scholar
[20] Teng D, Wang K, Li Z, Zhao Y Z, Zhao G, Li H Y, Wang H 2019 Appl. Sci-Basel. 9 2351Google Scholar
[21] Cheng X, Xue W R, Wei Z Z, Dong H Y, Li C Y 2019 Opt. Commun. 452 467Google Scholar
[22] White T P, Kuhlmey B T, McPhedran R C, Maystre D, Renversez G, Sterke C M, Botten L C 2002 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19 2322Google Scholar
[23] Bao Q L, Loh K P 2012 ACS Nano 6 3677Google Scholar
[24] Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari A C 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 611Google Scholar
[25] 翟利, 薛文瑞, 杨荣草, 韩丽萍 2015 光学学报 35 1123001Google Scholar
Zhai L, Xue W R, Yang R C, Han L P 2015 Acta Opt. Sin. 35 1123001Google Scholar
[26] Schedin F, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Hill E W, Blake P, Katsnelson M I, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 652Google Scholar
[27] Zhang J, Boyd A, Tselev A, Paranjape M, Barbara P 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 123112Google Scholar
[28] 郭亚楠, 薛文瑞, 张文梅 2009 物理学报 58 4168Google Scholar
Guo Y N, Xue W R, Zhang W M 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 4168Google Scholar
[29] 邓新华, 刘江涛, 袁吉任, 王同标 2015 物理学报 64 057801Google Scholar
Deng X H, Liu J T, Yuan J R, Wang T B 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 057801Google Scholar
[30] Nikitin A Y, Guinea F, Garcia-Vidal F J, Martin-Moreno L 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 195446Google Scholar
[31] Chen K, Zhou X, Cheng X, Qiao R X, Cheng Y, Liu C, Xie Y D, Yu W T, Yao F R, Sun Z P, Wang F, Liu K H, Liu Z F 2019 Nat. Photonics 13 754Google Scholar
[32] Erricolo D, Carluccio G 2013 ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 40 153
[33] Teng D, Wang K, Li Z, Zhao Y Z 2019 Opt. Express 27 12458Google Scholar
[34] Xing R, Jian S S 2017 IEEE Photonic Tech. L. 29 1643Google Scholar
[35] Ye S, Wang Z X, Sun C R, Dong C B, Wei B Z, Wu B L, Jian S S 2018 Opt. Express 26 23854Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3853
- PDF Downloads: 65
- Cited By: 0