-
The blackout problem suffered by hypersonic vehicles as they re-enter the atmosphere is essential for effective communication of hypersonic vehicles. Aiming to solve this problem, in this paper, we proposed an antenna–sheath–plasma layer configuration, in which a thin plasma layer covered cylindrical metal antenna model is employed to investigate the radiation enhancement phenomenon by solving the dispersion equation of electromagnetic mode under optimized parameter conditions. Analytical results show that when the neutral gas pressure is low (p = 0.5 mTorr) and the antenna radius is triple the plasma skin depth, the thickness of the sheath between the surface of metal cylindrical antenna and plasma layer is about several Debye lengths, the azimuthally symmetric wave (m = 0 mode) that propagates along the antenna surface belongs to the fast wave (the phase velocity is greater than the light speed), there exists a critical plasma frequency ωpe (or plasma density n0), above which the propagating mode becomes evanescent wave; for the propagation characteristic, there exists a critical normalized sheath thickness (ι/λDe)pha (or (ι/λDe)att), above which the phase constant (or the attenuation constant) begins to increase (or decrease) sharply, which indicates a significant change in the propagation property of the propagating mode; most importantly, when the wave frequency ω/2π = 1 GHz, sheath thickness is one tenth of the whole plasma layer thickness, owing to the electron plasma frequency resonance and antenna-sheath-plasma resonance effect, the maximum radiation intensity of the symmetric wave exhibits an elliptical-like profile near ωpe/ω = 1 and ωpe/ω ≈ 1.33, respectively, while only a single-point radiation enhancement occurs at frequencies far from GHz range. These conclusions not only provide a method to solve or alleviate the blackout problem of GHz frequency communication faced by the hypersonic vehicles when they re-enter the atmosphere, but also have potential applications in high-resolution imaging induced by plasmonic micro-nano sized enhanced radiation and high-resolution phased array antennas.
-
Keywords:
- plasma /
- sheath /
- electromagnetic wave radiation /
- dispersion relation
[1] Kumar N, Vadera S R 2017 Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies (Singapore: Springer) p519
[2] Ananth P B, Abhiram N, Krishna K H, et al. 2021 Mater. Today Proc. 47 4872Google Scholar
[3] Ghayekhloo A, Abdolali A, Armaki S H M 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 3058Google Scholar
[4] Dong B, Ma Y, Ren Z, et al. 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 213001Google Scholar
[5] Koya A N, Cunha J, Guerrero-Becerra K A, Garoli D, Wang T, Juodkazis S, Zaccaria R P 2021 Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2103706Google Scholar
[6] 李盼 2019 物理学报 68 146201Google Scholar
Li P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 146201Google Scholar
[7] 陆云清, 呼斯楞, 陆懿, 许吉, 王瑾 2015 物理学报 64 077303Google Scholar
Lu Y Q, Hu S L, Lu Y, Xu J, Wang J 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 077303Google Scholar
[8] Webb B A, Ziolkowski R W 2020 Photonics 7 88Google Scholar
[9] Kim M, Boyd I D, Keidar M 2010 J. Spacecr. Rockets 47 29Google Scholar
[10] Pinder D N 1965 Electron. Lett. 10 291Google Scholar
[11] Messiaen A M, Vandenplas P E 1967 Electron. Lett. 1 26Google Scholar
[12] Lin C C, Chen K M 1970 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 18 831Google Scholar
[13] Freeman E M, Lin C C, Chen K M 1971 Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 118 1748Google Scholar
[14] Gao X T, Wang C S, Jiang B, Zhang Z L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 093301Google Scholar
[15] Wang C S, Li X, Jiang B 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 102901Google Scholar
[16] Mouzouris Y, Scharer J E 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 4253Google Scholar
[17] Virko V F, Kirichenko G S, Shamrai K P 2002 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 11 10Google Scholar
[18] Niemi K, Krämer M 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 073503Google Scholar
[19] Shamrai K P, Shinohara S 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 4659Google Scholar
[20] Huba J D 2016 NRL Plasma Formulary (Washington: Naval Research Laboratory) p34
[21] Fried B D, Conte S D 2015 The Plasma Dispersion Function: The Hilbert Transform of the Gaussian (New York: Academic Press) p1
[22] Glaude V M M, Moisan M, Pantel R, Leprince P, Marec J 1980 J. Appl. Phys. 51 5693Google Scholar
[23] Jackson J D 1999 Classical Electrodynamics (New York: John Wiley & Sons) p176
[24] Swanson D G 1989 Plasma Waves (New York: Academic Press) p155
[25] Stix T H 1992 Waves in Plasmas (New York: Springer Verlag) p72
[26] Chen F F, Arnush D 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 5051Google Scholar
-
图 3 ω/(2π) = 1 GHz,
${T_{\text{e}}} = 3{\text{ eV}}$ ,$p = 0.5{\text{ mTorr}}$ ,$a = $ $ 3\max \{ {\delta _{{\text{pe}}}}\}$ 时, 相位常数和衰减常数与归一化等离子体频率的依赖关系Figure 3. Phase and attenuation constant versus electron temperature for wave frequency ω/(2π) = 1 GHz,
${T_{\text{e}}} = 3{\text{ eV}}$ ,$p = 0.5{\text{ mTorr}}$ ,$a = 3\max \{ {\delta _{{\text{pe}}}}\} $ .图 5
$\omega /(2{\text{π }}) = 3{\text{ GHz}}$ ,${\omega _{{\text{pe}}}} = 3\omega $ ,$p = 0.5{\text{ mTorr}}$ ,$a = 3{\delta _{{\text{pe}}}}$ 时, 电磁波在主等离子体区域的功率损耗随归一化相速的变化关系Figure 5. Power loss of electromagnetic waves in the main plasma region vs. the normalized phase velocity at
$\omega /(2{\text{π }}) = $ $ 3{\text{ GHz}}$ ,${\omega _{{\text{pe}}}} = 3\omega $ ,$p = 0.5{\text{ mTorr}}$ ,$a = 3{\delta _{{\text{pe}}}}$ . -
[1] Kumar N, Vadera S R 2017 Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies (Singapore: Springer) p519
[2] Ananth P B, Abhiram N, Krishna K H, et al. 2021 Mater. Today Proc. 47 4872Google Scholar
[3] Ghayekhloo A, Abdolali A, Armaki S H M 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 3058Google Scholar
[4] Dong B, Ma Y, Ren Z, et al. 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 213001Google Scholar
[5] Koya A N, Cunha J, Guerrero-Becerra K A, Garoli D, Wang T, Juodkazis S, Zaccaria R P 2021 Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2103706Google Scholar
[6] 李盼 2019 物理学报 68 146201Google Scholar
Li P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 146201Google Scholar
[7] 陆云清, 呼斯楞, 陆懿, 许吉, 王瑾 2015 物理学报 64 077303Google Scholar
Lu Y Q, Hu S L, Lu Y, Xu J, Wang J 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 077303Google Scholar
[8] Webb B A, Ziolkowski R W 2020 Photonics 7 88Google Scholar
[9] Kim M, Boyd I D, Keidar M 2010 J. Spacecr. Rockets 47 29Google Scholar
[10] Pinder D N 1965 Electron. Lett. 10 291Google Scholar
[11] Messiaen A M, Vandenplas P E 1967 Electron. Lett. 1 26Google Scholar
[12] Lin C C, Chen K M 1970 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 18 831Google Scholar
[13] Freeman E M, Lin C C, Chen K M 1971 Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 118 1748Google Scholar
[14] Gao X T, Wang C S, Jiang B, Zhang Z L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 093301Google Scholar
[15] Wang C S, Li X, Jiang B 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 102901Google Scholar
[16] Mouzouris Y, Scharer J E 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 4253Google Scholar
[17] Virko V F, Kirichenko G S, Shamrai K P 2002 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 11 10Google Scholar
[18] Niemi K, Krämer M 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 073503Google Scholar
[19] Shamrai K P, Shinohara S 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 4659Google Scholar
[20] Huba J D 2016 NRL Plasma Formulary (Washington: Naval Research Laboratory) p34
[21] Fried B D, Conte S D 2015 The Plasma Dispersion Function: The Hilbert Transform of the Gaussian (New York: Academic Press) p1
[22] Glaude V M M, Moisan M, Pantel R, Leprince P, Marec J 1980 J. Appl. Phys. 51 5693Google Scholar
[23] Jackson J D 1999 Classical Electrodynamics (New York: John Wiley & Sons) p176
[24] Swanson D G 1989 Plasma Waves (New York: Academic Press) p155
[25] Stix T H 1992 Waves in Plasmas (New York: Springer Verlag) p72
[26] Chen F F, Arnush D 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 5051Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2878
- PDF Downloads: 79
- Cited By: 0