-
使用溶胶-凝胶法在单晶硅衬底上制备一批不同Zn2+成分调节的TiO2薄膜, 观测Zn2+和TiO2合金化过程中光学和光催化性能的变化. X射线衍射光谱仪用于观测在合金化过程中薄膜的晶体结构变化并追踪ZnTiO3化合物的形成. 扫描电子显微镜、原子力显微镜用于观测合金化过程中因TiO2晶格对Zn2+溶解度有限而导致薄膜表面出现大量孔洞的现象. X射线光电子能谱和光学带隙用于观测Zn2+与TiO2合金化过程中电子结构层面的变化. 最后, 通过降解亚甲基蓝(MB)溶液, 表明少量Zn2+掺杂完全溶解在TiO2中, 并破坏TiO2结晶质量. 在Zn2+的成分占比继续提高至15%的过程中, XPS峰形拟合结果验证了TiO2对Zn2+的溶解度有限, 导致薄膜出现大量孔洞结构, 薄膜的活性比表面积得以提升, 同时Zn2+可以有效地捕获光生e–/h+. 为了继续观察Zn2+浓度对TiO2的影响, 将Zn2+的浓度提升至40%, 观察Zn2+与TiO2合金化过程中的现象. 表明化合物ZnTiO3的出现可以充当e–/h+的复合中心以及TiO2占比的大幅下降导致合金化之后的薄膜光催化效率逐渐下降.A batch of TiO2 films with different Zn2+ compositions are prepared on a single crystal silicon substrate by using sol-gel method to observe the changes in optical and photocatalytic properties in the alloying process of Zn2+ and TiO2. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) is used to observe the changes in the crystal structures of the films in the alloying process and to track the formation of ZnTiO3 compounds. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and atomic force microscope (AFM) are used to observe the phenomena of a large number of holes on the surfaces of the films due to the limited solubility of the crystal lattice for Zn2+ in the alloying process. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and optical bandgap are used to observe the changes at a level of the electronic structure of the films in the alloying process of Zn2+ with TiO2. Finally, by degrading the methylene blue solution, it is shown that a small amount of Zn2+ doping is completely dissolved in TiO2, destroying the TiO2 crystalline quality. As the compositional share of Zn2+ continues to increase to 15%, the limited solubility of TiO2 for Zn2+ is verified in the XPS peak fitting, resulting in a large number of hole structures in the film, and the active specific surface area of the film is enhanced, while Zn2+ effectively traps the photogenerated e–/h+. In order to continue to observe the effect of Zn2+ concentration on TiO2, we increase the concentration of Zn2+ to 40% and observe the phenomenon in the alloying process of Zn2+ with TiO2. It is shown that the appearance of the compound ZnTiO3 can act as a complex center for e–/h+ and a significant decrease in the percentage of TiO2 leads to a gradual decrease in the photocatalytic efficiency of the films after alloying.
-
Keywords:
- TiO2 /
- Zn2+ /
- photocatalysis /
- bandgap /
- surface
[1] Lukong V T, Ukoba K, Jen T C 2022 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 122 3525
Google Scholar
[2] 李冬冬, 王丽莉 2012 物理学报 61 034212
Google Scholar
Li D D, Wang L L 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 034212
Google Scholar
[3] Chinnarani M, Suresh S, Prabu K M, Kandasamy M, Pugazhenthiran N 2024 Inorg. Chim. Acta 560 121842
Google Scholar
[4] Sanattalab E, Gürdağ G, Sığırcı B D 2023 Biomater. Adv. 148 213365
Google Scholar
[5] Ziental D, Goslinska B C, Mlynarczyk D T, Sobotta A G, Stanisz B, Goslinski T L 2020 Nanomaterials 10 387
Google Scholar
[6] Zhu Z W, Chen S F, Zhang Y, Wang W 2022 Prog. Org. Coat. 173 107226
Google Scholar
[7] Alrowaili Z A, Alsohaimi I H, Betiha M A, Essawy A A, Mousa A A, Alruwaili S F, Hassan H M A 2020 Mater. Chem. Phys. 241 122403
Google Scholar
[8] Ike P O, Ezugwu S, Chikwenze R, Nwanya A C, Ezugwu A E, Madiba I G, Ezekoye B A, Ahmed M S, Maaza M, Ezema F I 2019 Optik 191 1
Google Scholar
[9] Aruna S T, Vismaya A, Balaji N 2021 Mater. Manuf. Processes 36 868
Google Scholar
[10] Mittireddi R T, Makani N H, Prajapati D, Raj A, Banerjee R, Panda E 2023 Mater. Charact. 199 112818
Google Scholar
[11] Sun N R, Wang J W, Yao J Z, Chen H M, Deng C H 2019 Microchim. Acta 186 159
Google Scholar
[12] Zhang Q, Li C Y 2020 Nanomaterials 10 911
Google Scholar
[13] Kusior A, Banas J, Zajac A T, Zubrzycka P, Ilnicka A M, Radecka M 2018 J. Mol. Struct. 1157 327
Google Scholar
[14] Al-Tayeb M A-A, Khan M Y, Drmosh Q A, Hossain M K, Asim M, Dafalla H, Khan A 2023 Inorg. Chim. Acta 556 121611
Google Scholar
[15] Ma Q, Qiu T, Liu S J, Weng L Q, Dong W Y 2010 Appl. Phys. A 104 365
Google Scholar
[16] Liu Y, Peng Q, Zhou Z P, Yang G 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 048101
Google Scholar
[17] Resende P D, Maria R, Silva J D, Azevedo I, Santos L A, Tadeu V 2020 J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9 10121
Google Scholar
[18] Chen C C, Hu S H, Fu Y P 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 632 326
Google Scholar
[19] Ahadi S, Moalej N S, Sheibani S 2019 Solid State Sci. 96 105975
Google Scholar
[20] Yoon Y H, Lee S Y, Gwon J, Cho H J, Wu Q, Kim Y H, Lee W H 2018 Ceram. Int. 44 16647
Google Scholar
[21] Qu X, Lin J B, Wei Q, Chen C T, Sun D P 2022 Chemosphere 308 136239
Google Scholar
[22] Jaimy K B, Safeena V P, Ghosh S, Hebalkar N, Warrier K 2012 Dalton Trans. 41 4824
Google Scholar
[23] Chen K T, Hsu C H, Jiang S C, Liang L S, Gao P, Qiu Y, Wu W Y, Zhang S, Zhu W Z, Lien S Y 2022 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 69 1149
Google Scholar
[24] Nair P K, Mizukami F, Nair J, Salou M, Oosawa Y, Izutsu H, Maeda K, Okubo T 1998 Mater. Res. Bull. 33 1495
Google Scholar
[25] Chen P C, Chen C C, Chen S H 2017 Curr. Nanosci. 13 373
Google Scholar
[26] Ren T Z, Yuan Z Y, Su B L 2004 Colloids Surf., A 241 67
Google Scholar
[27] Lang J, Takahashi K, Kubo M, Shimada M 2022 Catalysts 12 365
Google Scholar
[28] Mercado C C, Seeley Z M, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S, McHale J L 2011 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3 2281
Google Scholar
[29] Henderson M 2002 Surf. Sci. Rep. 46 1
Google Scholar
[30] Dikici T, Yılmaz O, Akalin A S, Demirci S, Gültekin S, Yıldırım S, Yurddaşkal M 2022 J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 58 1415
Google Scholar
[31] Xu W, Li X J, Zhang S J, Wang J G, Xu Z K 2005 Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 15 119
Google Scholar
[32] Wang C T, Lin H S, Wang W P 2019 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 99 85
Google Scholar
[33] Liao C Z, Li Y C, Tjong S C 2020 Nanomaterials 10 124
Google Scholar
[34] Ismael M 2020 Sol. Energy 211 522
Google Scholar
[35] Matsumoto Y, Katayama M, Abe T, Ohsawa T, Ohkubo I, Kumigashira H, Oshima M, Koinuma H 2010 J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 118 993
Google Scholar
[36] Ribao P, Rivero M J, Ortiz I 2017 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 12628
Google Scholar
[37] Tang T, Wang T, Gao Y, Xiao H, Xu J H 2019 J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. Electron. 30 8471
Google Scholar
[38] Xavier A M, Jacob I D, Surender S, Saravana kumaar M S S, Elangovan P 2022 Inorg. Chem. Commun. 146 110168
Google Scholar
[39] Pecherskaya M D, Butanov K T, Ruzimuradov O N, Mamatkulov S I, Parpiev O 2022 Glass Phys. Chem. 48 327
Google Scholar
[40] Heiba Z K, Mohamed M B, Badawi A, Abdellatief M 2022 J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. Electron. 33 10399
Google Scholar
[41] Castellón E, Zayat M, Lévy D 2017 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 04717
Google Scholar
[42] Chu J Y, Sun Y C, Han X J, Zhang B, Du Y C, Song B, Xu P 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 18475
Google Scholar
[43] Maleki K, Abdizadeh H, Golobostanfard M R, Adelfar R 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 394 37
Google Scholar
-
图 1 不同Zn2+成分占比的薄膜的 XRD 图样
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of thin films with different Zn2+ compositions.
图 2 不同Zn2+成分占比的薄膜的SEM图样
Fig. 2. SEM patterns of thin films with different Zn2+ compositions.
图 3 (a)纯TiO2以及(b)—(d) 3%, 15%和40% Zn2+成分占比的薄膜的二维和三维AFM图像
Fig. 3. 2D and 3D AFM images of thin films with (a) pure TiO2 and (b)–(d) 3%, 15% and 40% Zn2+ composition.
图 4 纯TiO2以及3%, 15% 和 40%Zn2+成分占比的薄膜的XPS光谱
Fig. 4. XPS spectra of pure TiO2 and thin films with 3%, 15% and 40% Zn2+ compositions.
图 5 不同Zn2+成分占比的薄膜的(a)吸收光谱和(b) 光带隙能
Fig. 5. (a) Absorption spectra and (b) optical band gap energy of films with different Zn2+ composition.
图 6 (a) 不同Zn2+成分占比的薄膜的吸收阈值波长和光带隙能; (b) 纯TiO2和Zn2+成分占比为3%, 15% 和 40%的薄膜的价带
Fig. 6. (a) Absorption threshold wavelengths and optical band gap energies of films with different Zn2+ compositions; (b) valence bands of pure TiO2 and films with 3%, 15% and 40% Zn2+ compositions.
图 7 不同Zn2+成分占比的薄膜的能带位置示意图
Fig. 7. Schematic representation of the energy band positions of films with different Zn2+ compositions.
图 8 降解亚甲基蓝的光催化活性 (a) 随时间变化的降解量; (b) 相应的降解反应速率常数图
Fig. 8. Photocatalytic activity for degradation of methylene blue: (a) Degradation amount with time; (b) corresponding degradation rate constant plots.
图 9 光催化反应速率(η)与光催化反应常数(Kapp)的关系图
Fig. 9. Plot of photocatalytic reaction rate (η) versus photocatalytic reaction constant (Kapp).
表 1 从 XRD 图谱获得的结构参数
Table 1. Structural parameters obtained from XRD spectra.
Samples (h k l ) FWHM β/(°) D/nm TiO2 (1 0 1) 0.177 8.384 3% Zn-TiO2 (1 0 1) 0.161 9.217 5% Zn-TiO2 (1 0 1) 0.197 7.533 10% Zn-TiO2 (1 0 1) 0.180 8.244 15% Zn-TiO2 (1 0 1) 0.259 5.730 20% Zn-TiO2 (1 0 1) 0.152 9.762 40% Zn-TiO2 (1 0 1) 0.227 6.537 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 从AFM获得的粗糙度参数(Ra为算数平均粗糙度, RMS为均方根粗糙度, RSk为粗糙度斜率, RKu为粗糙度峰度)
Table 2. Roughness parameters obtained from AFM (Ra, RMS, RSk, RKu are the average, root- mean-square, Skewness, and Kurtosis values of surface roughness, respectively).
Samples Roughness
Ra/nmRoughness
RMS/nmSkewness
RSkKurtosis
RKuTiO2 3.515 4.359 –0.492 0.276 3%Zn-TiO2 2.230 2.851 –0.077 0.089 15%Zn-TiO2 5.590 6.990 –0.313 0.819 40%Zn-TiO2 6.115 8.703 –1.079 3.318
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Lukong V T, Ukoba K, Jen T C 2022 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 122 3525
Google Scholar
[2] 李冬冬, 王丽莉 2012 物理学报 61 034212
Google Scholar
Li D D, Wang L L 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 034212
Google Scholar
[3] Chinnarani M, Suresh S, Prabu K M, Kandasamy M, Pugazhenthiran N 2024 Inorg. Chim. Acta 560 121842
Google Scholar
[4] Sanattalab E, Gürdağ G, Sığırcı B D 2023 Biomater. Adv. 148 213365
Google Scholar
[5] Ziental D, Goslinska B C, Mlynarczyk D T, Sobotta A G, Stanisz B, Goslinski T L 2020 Nanomaterials 10 387
Google Scholar
[6] Zhu Z W, Chen S F, Zhang Y, Wang W 2022 Prog. Org. Coat. 173 107226
Google Scholar
[7] Alrowaili Z A, Alsohaimi I H, Betiha M A, Essawy A A, Mousa A A, Alruwaili S F, Hassan H M A 2020 Mater. Chem. Phys. 241 122403
Google Scholar
[8] Ike P O, Ezugwu S, Chikwenze R, Nwanya A C, Ezugwu A E, Madiba I G, Ezekoye B A, Ahmed M S, Maaza M, Ezema F I 2019 Optik 191 1
Google Scholar
[9] Aruna S T, Vismaya A, Balaji N 2021 Mater. Manuf. Processes 36 868
Google Scholar
[10] Mittireddi R T, Makani N H, Prajapati D, Raj A, Banerjee R, Panda E 2023 Mater. Charact. 199 112818
Google Scholar
[11] Sun N R, Wang J W, Yao J Z, Chen H M, Deng C H 2019 Microchim. Acta 186 159
Google Scholar
[12] Zhang Q, Li C Y 2020 Nanomaterials 10 911
Google Scholar
[13] Kusior A, Banas J, Zajac A T, Zubrzycka P, Ilnicka A M, Radecka M 2018 J. Mol. Struct. 1157 327
Google Scholar
[14] Al-Tayeb M A-A, Khan M Y, Drmosh Q A, Hossain M K, Asim M, Dafalla H, Khan A 2023 Inorg. Chim. Acta 556 121611
Google Scholar
[15] Ma Q, Qiu T, Liu S J, Weng L Q, Dong W Y 2010 Appl. Phys. A 104 365
Google Scholar
[16] Liu Y, Peng Q, Zhou Z P, Yang G 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 048101
Google Scholar
[17] Resende P D, Maria R, Silva J D, Azevedo I, Santos L A, Tadeu V 2020 J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9 10121
Google Scholar
[18] Chen C C, Hu S H, Fu Y P 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 632 326
Google Scholar
[19] Ahadi S, Moalej N S, Sheibani S 2019 Solid State Sci. 96 105975
Google Scholar
[20] Yoon Y H, Lee S Y, Gwon J, Cho H J, Wu Q, Kim Y H, Lee W H 2018 Ceram. Int. 44 16647
Google Scholar
[21] Qu X, Lin J B, Wei Q, Chen C T, Sun D P 2022 Chemosphere 308 136239
Google Scholar
[22] Jaimy K B, Safeena V P, Ghosh S, Hebalkar N, Warrier K 2012 Dalton Trans. 41 4824
Google Scholar
[23] Chen K T, Hsu C H, Jiang S C, Liang L S, Gao P, Qiu Y, Wu W Y, Zhang S, Zhu W Z, Lien S Y 2022 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 69 1149
Google Scholar
[24] Nair P K, Mizukami F, Nair J, Salou M, Oosawa Y, Izutsu H, Maeda K, Okubo T 1998 Mater. Res. Bull. 33 1495
Google Scholar
[25] Chen P C, Chen C C, Chen S H 2017 Curr. Nanosci. 13 373
Google Scholar
[26] Ren T Z, Yuan Z Y, Su B L 2004 Colloids Surf., A 241 67
Google Scholar
[27] Lang J, Takahashi K, Kubo M, Shimada M 2022 Catalysts 12 365
Google Scholar
[28] Mercado C C, Seeley Z M, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S, McHale J L 2011 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3 2281
Google Scholar
[29] Henderson M 2002 Surf. Sci. Rep. 46 1
Google Scholar
[30] Dikici T, Yılmaz O, Akalin A S, Demirci S, Gültekin S, Yıldırım S, Yurddaşkal M 2022 J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 58 1415
Google Scholar
[31] Xu W, Li X J, Zhang S J, Wang J G, Xu Z K 2005 Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 15 119
Google Scholar
[32] Wang C T, Lin H S, Wang W P 2019 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 99 85
Google Scholar
[33] Liao C Z, Li Y C, Tjong S C 2020 Nanomaterials 10 124
Google Scholar
[34] Ismael M 2020 Sol. Energy 211 522
Google Scholar
[35] Matsumoto Y, Katayama M, Abe T, Ohsawa T, Ohkubo I, Kumigashira H, Oshima M, Koinuma H 2010 J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 118 993
Google Scholar
[36] Ribao P, Rivero M J, Ortiz I 2017 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 12628
Google Scholar
[37] Tang T, Wang T, Gao Y, Xiao H, Xu J H 2019 J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. Electron. 30 8471
Google Scholar
[38] Xavier A M, Jacob I D, Surender S, Saravana kumaar M S S, Elangovan P 2022 Inorg. Chem. Commun. 146 110168
Google Scholar
[39] Pecherskaya M D, Butanov K T, Ruzimuradov O N, Mamatkulov S I, Parpiev O 2022 Glass Phys. Chem. 48 327
Google Scholar
[40] Heiba Z K, Mohamed M B, Badawi A, Abdellatief M 2022 J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. Electron. 33 10399
Google Scholar
[41] Castellón E, Zayat M, Lévy D 2017 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 04717
Google Scholar
[42] Chu J Y, Sun Y C, Han X J, Zhang B, Du Y C, Song B, Xu P 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 18475
Google Scholar
[43] Maleki K, Abdizadeh H, Golobostanfard M R, Adelfar R 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 394 37
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 1089
- PDF下载量: 23
- 被引次数: 0
