搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

谐振腔-单层二硫化钼系统中的高阶腔耦合等离极化激元

侯磊 关舒阳 尹俊 张语军 肖宜明 徐文 丁岚

引用本文:
Citation:

谐振腔-单层二硫化钼系统中的高阶腔耦合等离极化激元

侯磊, 关舒阳, 尹俊, 张语军, 肖宜明, 徐文, 丁岚
cstr: 32037.14.aps.73.20241106

High-order cavity coupled plasmon polaritons in resonant cavity-monolayer MoS2 system

Hou Lei, Guan Shu-Yang, Yin Jun, Zhang Yu-Jun, Xiao Yi-Ming, Xu Wen, Ding Lan
cstr: 32037.14.aps.73.20241106
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 以单层MoS2为代表的二维过渡金属硫族化物, 因具有可调谐的非零带隙, 故应用在光电子学器件中要比石墨烯更具优势. 本文使用经典电磁理论和有限元分析方法, 研究了谐振腔中腔模与单层MoS2等离激元之间耦合形成的腔耦合等离极化激元, 并重点计算和验证了其中高阶模式的特性. 考虑到化学气相沉积法生长的单层MoS2中衬底、多晶和缺陷会引起弱电子局域化, 从而导致基于自由电子气假设的Drude模型准确性变差, 故本文在理论和仿真中使用了Drude-Smith模型描述单层MoS2光电导率, 该模型通过拟合实验数据得到. 基于此, 不仅导出了高阶腔耦合等离极化激元的色散方程, 并求解出了其色散曲线, 还通过仿真计算验证了这些高阶模式的存在性, 分析了其基本性质以及弱电子局域化的影响. 上述结果能加深对二维材料等离激元的耦合激发以及特性调控的理解, 所用理论模型也能推广到其他低维、拓扑量子材料相关的等离系统当中.
    Compared with graphene, two-dimensional (2D) transition metal sulfides, represented by mono-/few-layer MoS2, have tunable non-zero bandgap, and thus their applications in optoelectronic devices are more advantageous. By using classical electromagnetic theory and finite element method (FEM), we investigate the cavity coupled plasmon polaritons (CCPPs) formed through the coupling between cavity modes in a resonator and plasmons in monolayer MoS2, particularly calculate and verify the properties of the high-order CCPPs. In previous work, it was demonstrated that the substrates, defects, and polycrystalline grains of the CVD grown monolayer MoS2 usually induce weak electron localization, which leads to the deviation from the Drude model based on the approximation of free electron gas. Therefore, here we use the Drude-Smith model with characteristic parameters obtained experimentally to describe the optical conductivity of monolayer MoS2 in our theoretical calculation and simulation. Then, we not only derive and solve the dispersion equations of the high-order CCPPs, but also verify the existence and analyze the properties of these high-order modes. Specifically, there are three types of CCPPs in the asymmetric cavity-monolayer MoS2 system, i.e. the FP-like-modes (FPLMs), the surface-plasmon-like modes (SPLMs), and the quasi-localized modes (QLMs). Among them, the FPLMs and QLMs can support high-order modes whereas the SPLMs only support the fundamental modes. According to our model, we calculate the wave localization properties for the 7th-order and 8th-order FPLM, the 3rd-order and 6th-order QLM, and the SPLM. These theoretical results are in good agreement with the simulation results. Moreover, the effects of weak electron localization are also shown by comparing the field distributions of the CCPPs based on the Drude model with those based on the Drude-Smith model. It is found that weak electron localization can reduce the coupling between the cavity modes and the plasmons in monolayer MoS2. These results can deepen our understanding of the excitation of plasmons in 2D materials as well as the modulation of their properties. Furthermore, the theoretical model can also be extended to other plasmonic systems related to low-dimensional and topological quantum materials.
      通信作者: 徐文, wenxu_issp@aliyun.com ; 丁岚, dinglan@ynu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12364033, U2230122, U2067207)、云南省基础研究专项(批准号: 202401AS070135)、云南省高层次人才培养支持计划(批准号: YNWR-QNBJ-2018-037)和云南大学研究生科研创新项目(批准号: KC-23233799)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Xu Wen, wenxu_issp@aliyun.com ; Ding Lan, dinglan@ynu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12364033, U2230122, U2067207), the Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 202401AS070135), the High-level Personnel Training Program of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. YNWR-QNBJ-2018-037), and the Research Innovation Foundation for Graduate Students of Yunnan University, China (Grant No. KC-23233799).
    [1]

    Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar

    [2]

    Geim A K, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183Google Scholar

    [3]

    Fan Y C, Shen N H, Zhang F L, Zhao Q, Wu H J, Fu Q H, Wei Z Y, Li H Q, Soukoulis C M 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1800537Google Scholar

    [4]

    Lu W, Ling J W, Xiu F X, Sun D 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 104310Google Scholar

    [5]

    Hou L, Yang Y K, Li A L, Wang Q J, Li Q N, Wu M, Ji P C, Zhang Y J, Xiao Y M, Xu W, Xiu F X, Ding L 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 115416Google Scholar

    [6]

    Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz T F 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 136805Google Scholar

    [7]

    Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N, Strano M S 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 699Google Scholar

    [8]

    Manzeli S, Ovchinnikov D, Pasquier D, Yazyev O V, Kis A 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 17033Google Scholar

    [9]

    Liu X, Hou L, Ji P C, Wang Q J, Wu M, Xiao Y M, Xu W, Ding L 2023 Nanophotonics 12 4441Google Scholar

    [10]

    Liu H, Neal A T, Zhu Z, Luo Z, Xu X F, Tomanek D, Ye P D 2014 ACS Nano 8 4033Google Scholar

    [11]

    Qiao J, Kong X, Hu Z X, Yang F, Ji W 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4475Google Scholar

    [12]

    Zhang S J, Pei Y F, Hu S Q, Wu N, Chen D Q, Lian C, Meng S 2023 Chin. Phys. Lett. 40 077502Google Scholar

    [13]

    Liu X Z, Galfsky T, Sun Z, Xia F N, Lin E C, Lee Y H, Kena-Cohen S, Menon V M 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 30Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kleemann M E, Chikkaraddy R, Alexeev E M, Kos D, Carnegie C, Deacon W, Pury A C de, Grosse C, Nijs B de, Mertens J, Tartakovskii A I, Baumberg J J 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1296Google Scholar

    [15]

    Verre R, Baranov D G, Munkhbat B, Cuadra J, Kall M, Shegai T 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 679Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu W J, Lee B, Naylor C H, Ee H S, Park J, Johnson A T C, Agarwal R 2016 Nano Lett. 16 1262Google Scholar

    [17]

    Hu G W, Krasnok A, Mazor Y, Qu C W, Alu A 2020 Nano Lett. 20 3217Google Scholar

    [18]

    Sun B, Wang Z, Liu Z, Tan X, Liu X, Shi T, Zhou J, Liao G 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1900541Google Scholar

    [19]

    Leng Q, Su H, Liu J, Zhou L, Qin K, Wang Q, Fu J, Wu S, Zhang X 2021 Nanophotonics 10 1871Google Scholar

    [20]

    Lan H Y, Hsieh Y H, Chiao Z Y, Jariwala D, Shih M H, Yen T J, Hess O, Lu Y J 2021 Nano Lett. 21 3083Google Scholar

    [21]

    Petrić M M, Kremser M, Barbone M, Nolinder A, Lyamkina A, Stier A V, Kaniber M, Müller K, Finley J J 2022 Nano Lett. 22 561Google Scholar

    [22]

    Zhu Y X, Yang J W, Abad-Arredondo J, Fernández-Domínguez A I, Garcia-Vidal F J, Natelson D 2024 Nano Lett. 24 525Google Scholar

    [23]

    Wang C, Xu W, Mei H Y, Qin H, Zhao X N, Zhang C, Yuan H F, Zhang J, Xu Y, Li P, Li M 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4139Google Scholar

    [24]

    Liu J, Ding L, Zhao C X, Liang C N, Xiao Y M, Zhang J, Xu W 2019 IEEE Photonics J. 11 4800608

    [25]

    Guo T Y, Hou L, Xu W, Xiao Y M, Ding L 2022 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B: Opt. Phys. 39 1711Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ding L, Xu W, Zhao C, Wang S, Liu H 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 4524Google Scholar

    [27]

    Maier S A 2007 Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (New York: Springer) p21

  • 图 1  非对称谐振腔-单层MoS2系统结构示意图

    Fig. 1.  Diagram of the asymmetric cavity-monolayer MoS2 system.

    图 2  (a) 单层MoS2光电导率随频率的变化; (b) 蓝宝石衬底的复折射率随频率的变化. 图(a)中使用普适电导率$\varSigma_0 = e^2/4 \hbar $对光电导率实部和虚部做归一化

    Fig. 2.  (a) Frequency dependency of optical conductivity of monolayer MoS2; (b) frequency dependency of the complex refractive index of the sapphire substrate. In panel (a) both the real and imaginary parts of the optical conductivity are normalized by universal conductivity $\varSigma_0 = e^2/4 \hbar $.

    图 3  (a) 非对称谐振腔等离系统中CCPP的色散关系图; (b) FPLM, (c) QLM和(d) SPLM模式的局域程度

    Fig. 3.  (a) Dispersion relations of the CCPPs supported by the ACPS and the localization of (b) FPLM, (c) QLM, and (d) SPLM modes.

    图 4  CCPP的FEM模拟 (a) 模拟模型示意图; (b) NF = 7和(c) NF = 8时FPLM, (d) 基模SPLM以及(e) NQ = 3和(f) NQ = 6时QLM的电磁场Ez空间分布. 注意此处电场分量Ez都已使用各自的最大值E0做了归一化

    Fig. 4.  FEM simulation results of the CCPPs: (a) Diagram of the simulation model. Field distributions of Ez for the FPLMs of (b) NF = 7 and (c) NF = 8, (d) the fundamental mode of SPLM, and the QLMs of (e) NQ = 3 and (f) NQ = 6. Note that the fields Ez are normalized by the corresponding maximum values E0.

    图 5  局域因子C不同时, CCPP的FEM模拟 (a)—(c) C = –0.75时的SPLM (a), QLM (b)及FPLM (c); (d)—(f) C = 0 时的SPLM (d), QLM (e)及FPLM (f). 注意此处电场分量Ez都未做归一化

    Fig. 5.  FEM simulation results of the CCPPs with different C: (a)–(c) Field distributions of (a) SPLM, (b) QLM, and (c) FPLM for C = –0.75; (d)–(f) results of (d) SPLM, (e) QLM, and (f) FPLM for C = 0. Note that the fields Ez are not normalized.

  • [1]

    Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar

    [2]

    Geim A K, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183Google Scholar

    [3]

    Fan Y C, Shen N H, Zhang F L, Zhao Q, Wu H J, Fu Q H, Wei Z Y, Li H Q, Soukoulis C M 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1800537Google Scholar

    [4]

    Lu W, Ling J W, Xiu F X, Sun D 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 104310Google Scholar

    [5]

    Hou L, Yang Y K, Li A L, Wang Q J, Li Q N, Wu M, Ji P C, Zhang Y J, Xiao Y M, Xu W, Xiu F X, Ding L 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 115416Google Scholar

    [6]

    Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz T F 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 136805Google Scholar

    [7]

    Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N, Strano M S 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 699Google Scholar

    [8]

    Manzeli S, Ovchinnikov D, Pasquier D, Yazyev O V, Kis A 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 17033Google Scholar

    [9]

    Liu X, Hou L, Ji P C, Wang Q J, Wu M, Xiao Y M, Xu W, Ding L 2023 Nanophotonics 12 4441Google Scholar

    [10]

    Liu H, Neal A T, Zhu Z, Luo Z, Xu X F, Tomanek D, Ye P D 2014 ACS Nano 8 4033Google Scholar

    [11]

    Qiao J, Kong X, Hu Z X, Yang F, Ji W 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4475Google Scholar

    [12]

    Zhang S J, Pei Y F, Hu S Q, Wu N, Chen D Q, Lian C, Meng S 2023 Chin. Phys. Lett. 40 077502Google Scholar

    [13]

    Liu X Z, Galfsky T, Sun Z, Xia F N, Lin E C, Lee Y H, Kena-Cohen S, Menon V M 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 30Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kleemann M E, Chikkaraddy R, Alexeev E M, Kos D, Carnegie C, Deacon W, Pury A C de, Grosse C, Nijs B de, Mertens J, Tartakovskii A I, Baumberg J J 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1296Google Scholar

    [15]

    Verre R, Baranov D G, Munkhbat B, Cuadra J, Kall M, Shegai T 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 679Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu W J, Lee B, Naylor C H, Ee H S, Park J, Johnson A T C, Agarwal R 2016 Nano Lett. 16 1262Google Scholar

    [17]

    Hu G W, Krasnok A, Mazor Y, Qu C W, Alu A 2020 Nano Lett. 20 3217Google Scholar

    [18]

    Sun B, Wang Z, Liu Z, Tan X, Liu X, Shi T, Zhou J, Liao G 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1900541Google Scholar

    [19]

    Leng Q, Su H, Liu J, Zhou L, Qin K, Wang Q, Fu J, Wu S, Zhang X 2021 Nanophotonics 10 1871Google Scholar

    [20]

    Lan H Y, Hsieh Y H, Chiao Z Y, Jariwala D, Shih M H, Yen T J, Hess O, Lu Y J 2021 Nano Lett. 21 3083Google Scholar

    [21]

    Petrić M M, Kremser M, Barbone M, Nolinder A, Lyamkina A, Stier A V, Kaniber M, Müller K, Finley J J 2022 Nano Lett. 22 561Google Scholar

    [22]

    Zhu Y X, Yang J W, Abad-Arredondo J, Fernández-Domínguez A I, Garcia-Vidal F J, Natelson D 2024 Nano Lett. 24 525Google Scholar

    [23]

    Wang C, Xu W, Mei H Y, Qin H, Zhao X N, Zhang C, Yuan H F, Zhang J, Xu Y, Li P, Li M 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4139Google Scholar

    [24]

    Liu J, Ding L, Zhao C X, Liang C N, Xiao Y M, Zhang J, Xu W 2019 IEEE Photonics J. 11 4800608

    [25]

    Guo T Y, Hou L, Xu W, Xiao Y M, Ding L 2022 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B: Opt. Phys. 39 1711Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ding L, Xu W, Zhao C, Wang S, Liu H 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 4524Google Scholar

    [27]

    Maier S A 2007 Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (New York: Springer) p21

  • [1] 杨肖杰, 许辉, 徐海烨, 李铭, 于鸿飞, 成昱轩, 侯海良, 陈智全. 基于石墨烯等离激元太赫兹结构的传感及慢光应用. 物理学报, 2024, 73(15): 157802. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240668
    [2] 汪静丽, 杨志雄, 董先超, 尹亮, 万洪丹, 陈鹤鸣, 钟凯. 基于VO2的太赫兹各向异性编码超表面. 物理学报, 2023, 72(12): 124204. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222171
    [3] 马少卿, 龚士香, 张微, 路承彪, 李小俚, 李英伟. 宽带微量太赫兹辐射促进神经元生长发育. 物理学报, 2022, 71(20): 208701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220636
    [4] 刘紫玉, 亓丽梅, 道日娜, 戴林林, 武利勤. 基于VO2的波束可调太赫兹天线. 物理学报, 2022, 71(18): 188703. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220817
    [5] 闫忠宝, 孙帅, 张帅, 张尧, 史伟, 盛泉, 史朝督, 张钧翔, 张贵忠, 姚建铨. 二氧化钒相变对太赫兹反谐振光纤谐振特性的影响及其应用. 物理学报, 2021, 70(16): 168701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210084
    [6] 郭良浩, 王少萌, 杨利霞, 王凯程, 马佳路, 周俊, 宫玉彬. 太赫兹波在神经细胞中传输的弱谐振效应. 物理学报, 2021, 70(24): 240301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211677
    [7] 李泽宇, 姜去寒, 马腾洲, 袁英豪, 陈麟. 基于太赫兹石墨烯等离激元的多参数相位可调谐结构及其应用. 物理学报, 2021, 70(22): 224202. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210445
    [8] 黄坤, 王腾飞, 姚激. 单层MoS2的热弹耦合非线性板模型. 物理学报, 2021, 70(13): 136201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210160
    [9] 赵承祥, 郄媛, 余耀, 马荣荣, 秦俊飞, 刘彦. 等离激元增强的石墨烯光吸收. 物理学报, 2020, 69(6): 067801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191645
    [10] 张朋, 刘政, 戴建明, 杨昭荣, 苏付海. 强磁场在ZnCr2Se4中诱导的各向异性太赫兹共振吸收. 物理学报, 2020, 69(20): 207501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201507
    [11] 张尧, 孙帅, 闫忠宝, 张果, 史伟, 盛泉, 房强, 张钧翔, 史朝督, 张贵忠, 姚建铨. 太赫兹双芯反谐振光纤的设计及其耦合特性. 物理学报, 2020, 69(20): 208703. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200662
    [12] 王晓雷, 赵洁惠, 李淼, 姜光科, 胡晓雪, 张楠, 翟宏琛, 刘伟伟. 基于人工表面等离激元探针实现太赫兹波的紧聚焦和场增强. 物理学报, 2020, 69(5): 054201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191531
    [13] 吴晨晨, 郭相东, 胡海, 杨晓霞, 戴庆. 石墨烯等离激元增强红外光谱. 物理学报, 2019, 68(14): 148103. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190903
    [14] 周璐, 赵国忠, 李晓楠. 基于双开口谐振环超表面的宽带太赫兹涡旋光束产生. 物理学报, 2019, 68(10): 108701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182147
    [15] 付亚男, 张新群, 赵国忠, 李永花, 于佳怡. 基于谐振环的太赫兹宽带偏振转换器件研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(18): 180701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.180701
    [16] 张学进, 陆延青, 陈延峰, 朱永元, 祝世宁. 太赫兹表面极化激元. 物理学报, 2017, 66(14): 148705. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.148705
    [17] 陶泽华, 董海明. MoS2电子屏蔽长度和等离激元. 物理学报, 2017, 66(24): 247701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.247701
    [18] 梁振江, 刘海霞, 牛燕雄, 刘凯铭, 尹贻恒. THz谐振腔型石墨烯光电探测器的设计. 物理学报, 2016, 65(16): 168101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.168101
    [19] 戴雨涵, 陈小浪, 赵强, 张继华, 陈宏伟, 杨传仁. 太赫兹波段谐振频率可调的开口谐振环结构. 物理学报, 2013, 62(6): 064101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.064101
    [20] 韩煜, 袁学松, 马春燕, 鄢扬. 波瓣波导谐振腔太赫兹回旋管的研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(6): 064102. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.064102
计量
  • 文章访问数:  275
  • PDF下载量:  14
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-08-06
  • 修回日期:  2024-10-14
  • 上网日期:  2024-10-23
  • 刊出日期:  2024-11-20

/

返回文章
返回