搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

固体氧化物燃料电池温升模拟中入口异常高温度梯度研究

申双林 张小坤 万兴文 郑克晴 凌意瀚 王绍荣

引用本文:
Citation:

固体氧化物燃料电池温升模拟中入口异常高温度梯度研究

申双林, 张小坤, 万兴文, 郑克晴, 凌意瀚, 王绍荣

Study on extremely high temperature gradient at entrance of solid oxide fuel cell by preheating model

SHEN Shuanglin, ZHANG Xiaokun, WAN Xingwen, ZHENG Keqing, LING Yihan, WANG Shaorong
PDF
导出引用
  • 针对固体氧化物燃料电池热循环失效问题,建立了固体氧化物燃料电池热气体预热动态模型,研究了电池内最大温度梯度分布规律和入口异常高温度梯度形成的原因,结果表明:在热气体参数和预热方式变化时,电池内最大温度梯度始终处于电池入口边缘处的电极表面;电池入口处存在异常高的温度梯度,且在入口一小段区域内,温度梯度沿流动方向迅速下降;其原因是模型中入口采用均一的平均速度和温度,“入口效应”强化气体与电池换热;采用入口段延长的方式可使入口速度充分发展,降低电池内最大温度梯度,但由于均一温度入口并未优化,入口处仍然存在很大的温度梯度和温度梯度变化;因此采用数值模拟研究电池预热升温安全性时,仅采用最大温度梯度作为安全性判据会高估电池内热应力。
    The degradation or failure caused by thermal stress is a serious problem for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), especially in preheating process. The common working temperature for SOFC is more than 700oC, so it should be preheated to startup temperature (e.g. 600oC) and thermal stress induced by temperature gradient in SOFC is a crucial factor that results in the degradation or failure of SOFC, therefore there are many studies on the optimization of preheating process.
    Numerical model is an important tool in the study of SOFC preheating process, however there is a serious contradiction between the model results and experiment. The numerical model always gives a very high temperature gradient in the SOFC which can result in SOFC crack according to the material permissible stress, and this result disagrees with the practical experiment. In this paper, a hot gas preheating model of SOFC is developed and the model is verified by comparing with model results in literature. Then, the location of maximum temperature gradient and distribution of temperature gradient in the SOFC are studied by this model, and the extremely high temperature gradient at entrance is analyzed. Some conclusions are given as following:
    1) The maximum temperature gradient is always located in the edge of SOFC nearby the gas entrance. The variation of temperature rise rate and velocity of hot gas shows negligible effect on the position of maximum temperature gradient in the gas flow direction. For single channel preheating method, the maximum temperature gradient is at the gas entrance. For dual channel preheating method, the maximum temperature gradient is always at the cathode gas entrance whatever gas feeding way is co-flow or counter-flow, because the thermal conductivity of cathode the lowest.
    2) There is extremely high temperature gradient at the gas entrance, and the temperature gradient sharply decrease along the gas flowing direction at the small entrance section. The extremely high temperature gradient may result from the uniform inlet temperature and velocity set in the model, and the entrance effect can greatly enhance the heat transfer between gas and SOFC components due to the large velocity and temperature difference at the entrance section.
    3) The entrance extension of gas channel can give a fully developed velocity distribution and reduce the temperature gradient at SOFC entrance, however, there is always a high temperature gradient at the entrance section of SOFC due to the uniform inlet gas temperature. Therefore, the maximum temperature gradient given by numerical model as a criterion of SOFC safety can overestimate the thermal stress and the distribution of temperature gradient in SOFC should be analyzed together to optimize the preheating process.
  • [1]

    Singhal S C, Kendall K. High-temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells:Fundamentals, Design and Applications. ELSEVIER, 2003.

    [2]

    Lymperopoulos N, Tsimis D, Aguilo-Rullan A, et al. The Status of SOFC and SOEC R&D in the European Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking Programme. ECS Transactions, 2019, 91(1):9-26.

    [3]

    Vora S D, Jesionowski G, Williams M C. Overview of U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy's Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Program for FY2019. ECS Transactions, 2019, 91(1):27-39.

    [4]

    Yokokawa H, Suzuki M, Yoda M, et al. Achievements of NEDO Durability Projects on SOFC Stacks in the Light of Physicochemical Mechanisms. Fuel Cells, 2019, 19(4):311-39.

    [5]

    Hayun H, Wolf R, Barad C, et al. Thermal shock resistant solid oxide fuel cell ceramic composite electrolytes. J Alloy Compd, 2020, 821.

    [6]

    Xu M, Li T S, Yang M, et al. Modeling of an anode supported solid oxide fuel cell focusing on thermal stresses. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(33):14927-40.

    [7]

    Xie J M, Hao W Q, Wang F H. Crack propagation of planar and corrugated solid oxide fuel cells during cooling process. Int J Energ Res, 2019, 43(7):3020-7.

    [8]

    Hanasaki M, Uryu C, Taniguchi S, et al. Durability of SOFC against Thermal and Redox Cycling//KAWADA T, SINGHAL S C. Solid Oxide Fuel Cells 13. 2013:691-7.

    [9]

    Bujalski W, Dikwal C M, Kendall K. Cycling of three solid oxide fuel cell types. J Power Sources, 2007, 171(1):96-100.

    [10]

    Apfel H, Rzepka M, Tu H, et al. Thermal start-up behaviour and thermal management of SOFC's. J Power Sources, 2006, 154(2):370-8.

    [11]

    Mirahmadi A, Valefi K. Study on Preheating Techniques for Start-up of Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2011, 8(6).

    [12]

    Selimovic A, Kemm M, Torisson T, et al. Steady state and transient thermal stress analysis in planar solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2005, 145(2):463-9.

    [13]

    Damm D L, Fedorov A G. Reduced-order transient thermal modeling for SOFC heating and cooling. J Power Sources, 2006, 159(2):956-67.

    [14]

    Colpan C O, Hamdullahpur F, Dincer I. Heat-up and start-up modeling of direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2010, 195(11):3579-89.

    [15]

    Chen M H, Jiang T L. The analyses of the heat-up process of a planar, anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell using the dual-channel heating strategy. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(11):6882-93.

    [16]

    Yuan P, Liu S-F. Effect of non-uniform inlet flow rate on the heat-up process of a solid oxide fuel cell unit with cross-flow configuration. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(28):12377-86.

    [17]

    Peksen M. 3D CFD/FEM analysis of thermomechanical long-term behaviour in SOFCs:Furnace operation with different fuel gases. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(36):12362-9.

    [18]

    Peksen M. Safe heating-up of a full scale SOFC system using 3D multiphysics modelling optimisation. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(1):354-62.

    [19]

    Peksen M, Al-Masri A, Blum L, et al. 3D transient thermomechanical behaviour of a full scale SOFC short stack. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(10):4099-107.

    [20]

    Zheng K, Kuang Y, Rao Z, et al. Numerical study on the effect of bi-polar plate geometry in the SOFC heating-up process. J Renew Sustain Ener, 2019, 11(1):014301.

    [21]

    Atkinson A, Sun B. Residual stress and thermal cycling of planar solid oxide fuel cells. Mater Sci Tech-lond, 2007, 23(10):1135-43.

    [22]

    Sun B, Rudkin R A, Atkinson A. Effect of Thermal Cycling on Residual Stress and Curvature of Anode-Supported SOFCs. Fuel Cells, 2009, 9(6):805-13.

    [23]

    Zhang Y, Xia C. A durability model for solid oxide fuel cell electrodes in thermal cycle processes. J Power Sources, 2010, 195(19):6611-8.

    [24]

    Dikwal C M, Bujalski W, Kendall K. The effect of temperature gradients on thermal cycling and isothermal ageing of micro-tubular solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources, 2009, 193(1):241-8.

    [25]

    Aguiar P, Adjiman C S, Brandon N P. Anode-supported intermediate-temperature direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell:II. Model-based dynamic performance and control. J Power Sources, 2005, 147(1):136-47.

    [26]

    Kakac S, Pramuanjaroenkij A, Zhou X Y. A review of numerical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(7):761-86.

    [27]

    Beale S B, Andersson M, Boigues-Muñoz C, et al. Continuum scale modelling and complementary experimentation of solid oxide cells. Prog Energy Combust Sci, 2021, 85:100902.

    [28]

    Chen M-H, Jiang T L. The analyses of the start-up process of a planar, anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell using three different start-up procedures. J Power Sources, 2012, 220:331-41.

    [29]

    Gamrat G, Favre-Marinet M, Asendrych D. Conduction and entrance effects on laminar liquid flow and heat transfer in rectangular microchannels. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 2005, 48(14):2943-54.

  • [1] 徐晗, 张璐. 空间电荷层效应对固体氧化物燃料电池三相界面附近氧空位传输的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210012
    [2] 李俊炜, 王祖军, 石成英, 薛院院, 宁浩, 徐瑞, 焦仟丽, 贾同轩. GaInP/GaAs/Ge三结太阳电池不同能量质子辐照损伤模拟. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191878
    [3] 徐晗, 张璐, 党政. 固体氧化物燃料电池模式阳极内传输与电化学反应耦合机理. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191697
    [4] 张梦, 姚若河, 刘玉荣. 纳米尺度金属-氧化物半导体场效应晶体管沟道热噪声模型. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191512
    [5] 李志旋, 岳明鑫, 周官群. 三维电磁扩散场数值模拟及磁化效应的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181567
    [6] 梁煜, 关奔, 翟志刚, 罗喜胜. 激波汇聚效应对球形气泡演化影响的数值研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.66.064701
    [7] 陆勇俊, 杨溢, 王峰会, 楼康, 赵翔. 连续梯度的功能层对燃料电池在初始还原过程中曲率及残余应力的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.65.098102
    [8] 刘宸, 孙宏祥, 袁寿其, 夏建平. 基于温度梯度分布的宽频带声聚焦效应. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.65.044303
    [9] 高新强, 沈俊, 和晓楠, 唐成春, 戴巍, 李珂, 公茂琼, 吴剑峰. 耦合高压斯特林制冷效应的复合磁制冷循环的数值模拟. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.64.210201
    [10] 封国宝, 王芳, 曹猛. 电子辐照聚合物带电特性多参数共同作用的数值模拟. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.64.227901
    [11] 高启, 张传飞, 周林, 李正宏, 吴泽清, 雷雨, 章春来, 祖小涛. Z箍缩Al等离子体X特征辐射谱线数值模拟及考虑叠加效应后的修正. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.63.125202
    [12] 刘腊群, 刘大刚, 王学琼, 杨超, 夏蒙重, 彭凯. 磁绝缘传输线中心汇流区电子能量沉积及温度变化的数值模拟研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.162902
    [13] 李哲, 江海河, 王礼, 杨经纬, 吴先友. 2 m Cr,Tm,Ho:YAG激光热退偏效应的数值模拟及实验研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.044205
    [14] 蔡利兵, 王建国, 朱湘琴. 强直流场介质表面次级电子倍增效应的数值模拟研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.085101
    [15] 庞学霞, 邓泽超, 贾鹏英, 梁伟华. 大气等离子体中氮氧化物粒子行为的数值模拟. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.125201
    [16] 孟广为, 李敬宏, 裴文兵, 李双贵, 张维岩. 温度梯度对平面金壁发射能流平衡性的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.025210
    [17] 陈曦, 王霞, 吴锴, 彭宗仁, 成永红. 温度梯度场对电声脉冲法空间电荷测量波形的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.59.7327
    [18] 朱樟明, 钟波, 郝报田, 杨银堂. 一种考虑温度的分布式互连线功耗模型. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7124
    [19] 曹士英, 宋振明, 秦瑀, 王清月, 张志刚. 飞秒激光在不同位置温度梯度的惰性气体中成丝及光谱展宽的差异. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3971
    [20] 江慧丰, 张青川, 陈忠家, 伍小平. 退火铝合金中Portevin-Le Chatelier效应的数值模拟研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2856
计量
  • 文章访问数:  122
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程

固体氧化物燃料电池温升模拟中入口异常高温度梯度研究

  • 1) (中国矿业大学低碳能源与动力工程学院, 江苏 徐州 221116);
  • 2) (中国矿业大学材料与物理学院, 江苏 徐州 221116);
  • 3) (中国矿业大学化工学院, 江苏 徐州 221116)

摘要: 针对固体氧化物燃料电池热循环失效问题,建立了固体氧化物燃料电池热气体预热动态模型,研究了电池内最大温度梯度分布规律和入口异常高温度梯度形成的原因,结果表明:在热气体参数和预热方式变化时,电池内最大温度梯度始终处于电池入口边缘处的电极表面;电池入口处存在异常高的温度梯度,且在入口一小段区域内,温度梯度沿流动方向迅速下降;其原因是模型中入口采用均一的平均速度和温度,“入口效应”强化气体与电池换热;采用入口段延长的方式可使入口速度充分发展,降低电池内最大温度梯度,但由于均一温度入口并未优化,入口处仍然存在很大的温度梯度和温度梯度变化;因此采用数值模拟研究电池预热升温安全性时,仅采用最大温度梯度作为安全性判据会高估电池内热应力。

English Abstract

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回