搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于材料组分信息的高居里温度铁磁材料预测

孙敬淇 吴绪才 阙志雄 张卫兵

引用本文:
Citation:

基于材料组分信息的高居里温度铁磁材料预测

孙敬淇, 吴绪才, 阙志雄, 张卫兵

Prediction of ferromagnetic materials with high Curie temperature based on material composition information

Sun Jing-Qi, Wu Xu-Cai, Que Zhi-Xiong, Zhang Wei-Bing
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 寻找具有高居里温度的铁磁材料是凝聚态物理的热点问题. 本文建立了有效的基于材料组分信息的居里温度机器学习模型, 并预测了多种高居里温度铁磁材料. 基于收集到的1568个铁磁材料数据, 并以铁磁材料的组分信息作为描述符, 通过超参数优化和十折交叉验证, 构建了支持向量回归、核岭回归、随机森林及极端随机树四种高效的机器学习模型. 这其中, 极端随机树模型具有最好的预测性能, 其交叉验证R2评分可达81.48%. 同时, 还应用极端随机树模型对Materials Project数据库36949种铁磁材料进行了预测, 发现了338个居里温度大于600 K的铁磁材料. 本文提出的方法可以为获取具有高居里温度的铁磁材料提供有价值的帮助, 加快铁磁材料设计的过程.
    The search for ferromagnetic materials with high Curie temperature (Tc) is a hot issue in condensed matter physics. In this work, an effective machine learning model of Curie temperature based on material component information is established to predict a variety of ferromagnetic materials with high Curie temperature. Based on the collected data of 1568 ferromagnetic materials, and taking the component information of ferromagnetic materials as descriptors, in this work four efficient machine learning models are constructed, namely support vector regression, kernel ridge regression, random forest and extremely randomized trees, through hyperparameter optimization and ten-break cross-validation. Of them, extremely randomized tree model has the best prediction performance, and its cross-validation R2 score can reach 81.48%. At the same time, the extremely randomized tree model is also used to predict 36949 materials in the materials project database, and 338 ferromagnetic materials with Tc greater than 600 K are found in this work. The method proposed in this paper can help obtain ferromagnetic materials with high Curie temperature and accelerate the process of ferromagnetic material design.
      通信作者: 张卫兵, zhangwb@csust.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11874092)、霍英东教育基金会第十六届高等院校青年教师基金(批准号: 161005)和湖南省杰出青年科学基金(批准号: 2021JJ10039)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Zhang Wei-Bing, zhangwb@csust.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11874092), the Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation, China (Grant No. 161005), and the Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2021JJ10039).
    [1]

    Sanvito S, Oses C, Xue J, Tiwari A, Zic M, Archer T, Tozman P, Venkatesan M, Coey M, Curtarolo S 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1602241Google Scholar

    [2]

    Jiang Z, Wang P, Jiang X, Zhao J 2018 Nanoscale Horiz. 3 335Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lu X, Fei R, Yang L 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 205409Google Scholar

    [4]

    Claussen N, Bernevig B A 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 245117Google Scholar

    [5]

    Jiang Z, Wang P, Xing J, Jiang X, Zhao J 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 39032Google Scholar

    [6]

    Kabiraj A, Kumar M, Mahapatra S 2020 npj Comput. Mater. 6 35Google Scholar

    [7]

    Lu S H, Zhou Q H, Guo Y, Wang J L 2022 Chem 8 769Google Scholar

    [8]

    Lu S H, Zhou Q H, Guo Y L, Zhang Y H, Wu Y L, Wang J L 2020 Adv. Mater. 32 2002658.Google Scholar

    [9]

    Nelson J, Sanvito S 2019 Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 104405Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xue Y F, Shen Z, Wu Z B, Song C S 2022 J. Appl. Phys. 132 053901Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhang B, Zheng X Q, Zhao T Y, Hu F X, Sun J R, Shen B G 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 067503Google Scholar

    [12]

    Vishina A, Vekilova O Y, BJörkman T, Bergman A, Herper H C, Eriksson O 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 094407Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kwon H Y, Kim N J, Lee C K, Won C 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 024423Google Scholar

    [14]

    Choudhary K, Garrity K F, Ghimire N J, Anand N, Tavazza F 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 155131Google Scholar

    [15]

    Coey J M D 2011 IEEE Trans. Magn. 47 4671Google Scholar

    [16]

    Buschow K J 2003 Handbook of Magnetic Materials (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp293–456

    [17]

    Connolly T F 2012 Bibliography of Magnetic Materials and Tabulation of Magnetic Transition Temperatures (New York: Springer Science & Business Media) pp1–30

    [18]

    Long T, Fortunato N M, Zhang Y, Gutfleisch O 2021 Mater. Res. Lett. 9 169Google Scholar

    [19]

    Zhai X, Chen M, Lu W 2018 Comput. Mater. Sci. 151 41Google Scholar

    [20]

    Fabian P, Gaël V, Alexandre G, Vincent M, Bertrand T, Olivier G, Mathieu B, Peter P, Ron W, Vincent D, Jake V, Alexandre P, David C, Matthieu B, Matthieu P, Duchesnay É 2011 J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 2825

    [21]

    Mirjalili 2019 Enetic Algorithm (Berlin: Springer) pp43–55

    [22]

    Syarif I, Prugel A, Wills G 2016 Telecommun. Comput. Electron. Control 14 1502Google Scholar

    [23]

    杨自欣, 高章然, 孙晓帆, 蔡宏灵, 张凤鸣, 吴小山 2019 物理学报 68 210502Google Scholar

    Yang Z X, Gao Z R, Sun X F, Cai H L, Zhang F M, Wu X S 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 210502Google Scholar

    [24]

    Benesty J, Chen J, Huang Y, Cohen I 2009 Pearson Correlation Coefficient (Berlin: Springer) pp1–4

    [25]

    Jain A, Ong S P, Hautie G, Chen W, Richards W D, Dacek S, Cholia S, Gunter D, Skinner D, Ceder G 2013 APL Mater. 1 011002Google Scholar

    [26]

    Popoel E, Tuszynski M, Zarek W, Rendecki T 1989 J. Less-Common Met. 146 127Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li J G, Pan M X, Sun J R, Zhang F X, Li S P, Zhao D Q, Yu X H, Zhao S X, Chen X C 1996 Solid State Commun. 97 pp1047Google Scholar

    [28]

    Dang M Z, Rancourt D G 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 2291Google Scholar

    [29]

    Miyata N, Kamimori T, Goto M 1986 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55 2037Google Scholar

    [30]

    Trumpy G, Both E, Djéga-Mariadassou C, Lecocq P 1970 Phys. Rev. B 2 3477Google Scholar

    [31]

    Meinert M 2016 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28 056006Google Scholar

  • 图 1  1568个铁磁材料数据集Tc的分布情况

    Fig. 1.  Distribution of Tc in 1568 ferromagnetic material data sets.

    图 2  数据集中铁磁材料的元素分布情况 (a) Tc大于300 K时元素分布; (b) Tc大于600 K时元素分布

    Fig. 2.  Element distribution of ferromagnetic materials in data set: (a) Element distribution when Tc is greater than 300 K; (b) element distribution when Tc is greater than 600 K.

    图 3  均匀网格搜索 (a) 随机森林参数优化图; (b) 极端随机树参数优化图

    Fig. 3.  Uniform grid search: (a) Random forest parameter optimization map; (b) extreme random tree parameter optimization map

    图 4  四种机器学习模型实验值和预测值对比的二维散点图 (a) 核岭回归; (b) 支持向量机; (c) 随机森林; (d) 极端随机树

    Fig. 4.  Two-dimensional scatter plots comparing experimental and predicted values of four machine learning models: (a) Kernel ridge regression; (b) support vector machine; (c) random forests; (d) extremely random tree.

    图 5  基于极端随机数模型的特征重要性排序图

    Fig. 5.  Feature importance ranking graph based on extreme random number model.

    图 6  预测集中铁磁材料元素分布情况 (a) 2531个Tc大于300 K数据的元素分布图; (b) 338个Tc大于600 K数据的元素分布图

    Fig. 6.  Element distribution of ferromagnetic materials in prediction set: (a) Element distribution of 2531 data with Tc greater than 300 K; (b) element distribution of 338 data with Tc greater than 600 K.

    图 7  预测集中338个Tc > 600 K的铁磁材料的Tc分布情况

    Fig. 7.  Curie temperature distribution of 338 ferromagnetic materials with Tc >600 K in prediction set.

    表 1  本研究中四种机器学习模型的超参数

    Table 1.  Hyperparameters of four machine learning models in this study.

    模型 超参数
    KRR alpha = 0.00567165, kernel = “rbf”
    SVR kernel = “rbf”, C = 181.8797945, gamma = 0.18646131
    RF n_estimators = 170, max_features = 0.30, min_samples_leaf = 0.001
    EXT n_estimators = 180, max_features = 0.58, min_samples_leaf = 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  基于特征筛选获得的化学参数描述符

    Table 2.  Chemical parameter descriptors obtained based on feature screening.

    No. Meanings Features
    1 Mean atomic number MAN
    2 Mean IonicRadius MIR
    3 Mean Modulus of Elasticity MME
    4 Mean melting point MMP
    5 Mean GSmagmom MGSM
    6 Mean covalentradius MCR
    7 Mean IonizationEnergy MIE
    8 Mean ElectronAffinity MEA
    9 Mean AtomicVolume MAV
    10 Mean MendeleevNumber MMN
    11 Composition of Mn CMn
    12 Composition of Fe CFe
    13 Composition of Co CCo
    14 Composition of Ni CNi
    15 range AtomicRadius RAR
    16 range Electronegativity REE
    17 avg p valence electrons ApV
    18 avg d valence electrons AdV
    19 frac f valence electrons FfV
    20 transition metal fraction TMF
    21 2-norm 2N
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  本研究中四种机器学习模型的最终评估结果

    Table 3.  Final evaluation results of four machine learning models in this study.

    KRR SVR RF EXT
    MAE 89.43 83.21 76.52 70.86
    RMSE 125.50 125.77 114.71 109.32
    R2/% 80.75 80.67 83.92 85.39
    CS MAE 95.41 88.64 81.18 74.04
    CS RMSE 141.21 137.62 124.13 117.98
    CS R2/% 73.70 74.92 79.45 81.48
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Sanvito S, Oses C, Xue J, Tiwari A, Zic M, Archer T, Tozman P, Venkatesan M, Coey M, Curtarolo S 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1602241Google Scholar

    [2]

    Jiang Z, Wang P, Jiang X, Zhao J 2018 Nanoscale Horiz. 3 335Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lu X, Fei R, Yang L 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 205409Google Scholar

    [4]

    Claussen N, Bernevig B A 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 245117Google Scholar

    [5]

    Jiang Z, Wang P, Xing J, Jiang X, Zhao J 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 39032Google Scholar

    [6]

    Kabiraj A, Kumar M, Mahapatra S 2020 npj Comput. Mater. 6 35Google Scholar

    [7]

    Lu S H, Zhou Q H, Guo Y, Wang J L 2022 Chem 8 769Google Scholar

    [8]

    Lu S H, Zhou Q H, Guo Y L, Zhang Y H, Wu Y L, Wang J L 2020 Adv. Mater. 32 2002658.Google Scholar

    [9]

    Nelson J, Sanvito S 2019 Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 104405Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xue Y F, Shen Z, Wu Z B, Song C S 2022 J. Appl. Phys. 132 053901Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhang B, Zheng X Q, Zhao T Y, Hu F X, Sun J R, Shen B G 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 067503Google Scholar

    [12]

    Vishina A, Vekilova O Y, BJörkman T, Bergman A, Herper H C, Eriksson O 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 094407Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kwon H Y, Kim N J, Lee C K, Won C 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 024423Google Scholar

    [14]

    Choudhary K, Garrity K F, Ghimire N J, Anand N, Tavazza F 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 155131Google Scholar

    [15]

    Coey J M D 2011 IEEE Trans. Magn. 47 4671Google Scholar

    [16]

    Buschow K J 2003 Handbook of Magnetic Materials (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp293–456

    [17]

    Connolly T F 2012 Bibliography of Magnetic Materials and Tabulation of Magnetic Transition Temperatures (New York: Springer Science & Business Media) pp1–30

    [18]

    Long T, Fortunato N M, Zhang Y, Gutfleisch O 2021 Mater. Res. Lett. 9 169Google Scholar

    [19]

    Zhai X, Chen M, Lu W 2018 Comput. Mater. Sci. 151 41Google Scholar

    [20]

    Fabian P, Gaël V, Alexandre G, Vincent M, Bertrand T, Olivier G, Mathieu B, Peter P, Ron W, Vincent D, Jake V, Alexandre P, David C, Matthieu B, Matthieu P, Duchesnay É 2011 J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 2825

    [21]

    Mirjalili 2019 Enetic Algorithm (Berlin: Springer) pp43–55

    [22]

    Syarif I, Prugel A, Wills G 2016 Telecommun. Comput. Electron. Control 14 1502Google Scholar

    [23]

    杨自欣, 高章然, 孙晓帆, 蔡宏灵, 张凤鸣, 吴小山 2019 物理学报 68 210502Google Scholar

    Yang Z X, Gao Z R, Sun X F, Cai H L, Zhang F M, Wu X S 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 210502Google Scholar

    [24]

    Benesty J, Chen J, Huang Y, Cohen I 2009 Pearson Correlation Coefficient (Berlin: Springer) pp1–4

    [25]

    Jain A, Ong S P, Hautie G, Chen W, Richards W D, Dacek S, Cholia S, Gunter D, Skinner D, Ceder G 2013 APL Mater. 1 011002Google Scholar

    [26]

    Popoel E, Tuszynski M, Zarek W, Rendecki T 1989 J. Less-Common Met. 146 127Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li J G, Pan M X, Sun J R, Zhang F X, Li S P, Zhao D Q, Yu X H, Zhao S X, Chen X C 1996 Solid State Commun. 97 pp1047Google Scholar

    [28]

    Dang M Z, Rancourt D G 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 2291Google Scholar

    [29]

    Miyata N, Kamimori T, Goto M 1986 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55 2037Google Scholar

    [30]

    Trumpy G, Both E, Djéga-Mariadassou C, Lecocq P 1970 Phys. Rev. B 2 3477Google Scholar

    [31]

    Meinert M 2016 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28 056006Google Scholar

  • [1] 郭焱, 吕恒, 丁春玲, 袁晨智, 金锐博. 分数阶涡旋光衍射过程的机器学习识别. 物理学报, 2025, 74(1): 1-8. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241458
    [2] 康瑶, 陈健, 童祎, 王新朋, 段坤, 王嘉琪, 王旭东, 周大雨, 姚曼. 纤锌矿铁电材料自发极化强度的本征影响因素. 物理学报, 2025, 74(2): . doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241520
    [3] 张旭, 丁进敏, 侯晨阳, 赵一鸣, 刘鸿维, 梁生. 基于机器学习的激光匀光整形方法. 物理学报, 2024, 73(16): 164205. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240747
    [4] 张嘉晖. 蛋白质计算中的机器学习. 物理学报, 2024, 73(6): 069301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231618
    [5] 欧阳鑫健, 张岩星, 王之龙, 张锋, 陈韦嘉, 庄园, 揭晓, 刘来君, 王大威. 面向铁电相变的机器学习: 基于图卷积神经网络的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2024, 73(8): 086301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240156
    [6] 刘冰心, 李宗良. CrO2单层: 一种兼具高居里温度和半金属特性的二维铁磁体. 物理学报, 2024, 73(10): 106102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240246
    [7] 张桥, 谭薇, 宁勇祺, 聂国政, 蔡孟秋, 王俊年, 朱慧平, 赵宇清. 基于机器学习和第一性原理计算的Janus材料预测. 物理学报, 2024, 73(23): 230201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241278
    [8] 刘烨, 牛赫然, 李兵兵, 马欣华, 崔树旺. 机器学习在宇宙线粒子鉴别中的应用. 物理学报, 2023, 72(14): 140202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230334
    [9] 管星悦, 黄恒焱, 彭华祺, 刘彦航, 李文飞, 王炜. 生物分子模拟中的机器学习方法. 物理学报, 2023, 72(24): 248708. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231624
    [10] 黎威, 龙连春, 刘静毅, 杨洋. 基于机器学习的无机磁性材料磁性基态分类与磁矩预测. 物理学报, 2022, 71(6): 060202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211625
    [11] 黄玉昊, 张贵涛, 王如倩, 陈乾, 王金兰. 二维双金属铁磁半导体CrMoI6的电子结构与稳定性. 物理学报, 2021, 70(20): 207301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210949
    [12] 林键, 叶梦, 朱家纬, 李晓鹏. 机器学习辅助绝热量子算法设计. 物理学报, 2021, 70(14): 140306. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210831
    [13] 陈江芷, 杨晨温, 任捷. 基于波动与扩散物理系统的机器学习. 物理学报, 2021, 70(14): 144204. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210879
    [14] 王伟, 揭泉林. 基于机器学习J1-J2反铁磁海森伯自旋链相变点的识别方法. 物理学报, 2021, 70(23): 230701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210711
    [15] 王海宇, 刘英杰, 寻璐璐, 李竞, 杨晴, 田祺云, 聂天晓, 赵巍胜. 大面积二维磁性材料的制备及居里温度调控. 物理学报, 2021, 70(12): 127301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210223
    [16] 杨自欣, 高章然, 孙晓帆, 蔡宏灵, 张凤鸣, 吴小山. 铅基钙钛矿铁电晶体高临界转变温度的机器学习研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(21): 210502. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190942
    [17] 王芳, 汪金芝, 冯唐福, 孙仁兵, 余盛. La(Fe, Si)13化合物的居里温度机制. 物理学报, 2014, 63(12): 127501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.127501
    [18] 申 晔, 邢怀中, 俞建国, 吕 斌, 茅惠兵, 王基庆. 极化诱导的内建电场对Mn δ掺杂的GaN/AlGaN量子阱居里温度的调制. 物理学报, 2007, 56(6): 3453-3457. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3453
    [19] 朱 骏, 卢网平, 刘秋朝, 毛翔宇, 惠 荣, 陈小兵. (Bi, La)4Ti3O12-Sr(Bi, La)4Ti4O15共生结构铁电材料性能研究. 物理学报, 2003, 52(10): 2627-2631. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2627
    [20] 陈伟, 钟伟, 潘成福, 常虹, 都有为. La0.8-xCa0.2MnO3纳米颗粒的居里温度与磁热效应. 物理学报, 2001, 50(2): 319-323. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.319
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3204
  • PDF下载量:  92
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-03-12
  • 修回日期:  2023-06-19
  • 上网日期:  2023-07-19
  • 刊出日期:  2023-09-20

/

返回文章
返回