片上光互连器件的智能化设计研究进展

杜特; 马汉斯; 姜鑫鹏; 赵芬; 张兆健; 王志成; 彭政; 张伊祎; 张煜青; 罗鸣宇; 邹宏新; 吴加贵; 闫培光; 朱刚毅; 于洋; 何新; 陈欢; 张振福; 杨俊波

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20230705

摘要

光互连技术相比于电互连等传统通信技术具有带宽大、能耗低、抗干扰等系列优势, 正在逐渐成为短距离、甚短距离数据终端间通信的重要手段和发展趋势. 基于绝缘体上硅的片上光互连技术作为光互连在芯片尺度上的实现, 在一系列复用技术的支持下得到了非常广泛的应用. 智能设计方法具有原理直观、设计自由度高、材料兼容性好等优点. 随着智能设计方法在片上光互连器件设计活动中的广泛应用, 目前片上光互连器件逐渐呈现出超紧凑化、可调控化、系统集成化等重要发展趋势. 本文首先归纳了几种目前最常用的片上光互连器件的智能设计方法, 然后详细分析了智能化设计的片上光互连器件的几个重大研究进展与趋势, 最后对未来智能化设计的片上光互连器件的发展进行了展望.

关键词:

Abstract

Compared with traditional communication technologies such as electrical interconnection, optical interconnection technology has the advantages of large bandwidth, low energy consumption, anti-interference, etc. Therefore, optical interconnection is becoming an important approach and development trend of short distance and very short distance data terminal communication. As the chip level optical interconnection is implemented, silicon on insulator (SOI) based on-chip optical interconnection has been widely utilized with the support of a series of multiplexing technologies. In recent decades, many on-chip optical interconnection devices have been developed by using conventional design methods such as coupled-mode, multimode interference, and transmission line theories. However, when used in device design, these conventional methods often face the problems such as complex theoretical calculations and high labor costs. Many of the designed devices also encounter the problems of insufficient compactness and integration, and single function.Intelligent design method has the advantages such as pellucid principle, high freedom of optimization, and good material compatibility, which can solve the problems of conventional design methods to a large extent. With the widespread use of intelligent design methods in the design of on-chip optical interconnection devices, three main trends have emerged. Firstly, the size of on-chip optical interconnect device is gradually developing towards ultra compact size. Secondly, the number of intelligently designed controllable on-chip optical interconnect devices is increasing. Thirdly, on-chip optical interconnect devices are gradually developing towards integration and systematization. This paper summarizes the most commonly used intelligent design methods of photonic devices, including intelligent algorithms based intelligent design methods and neural networks based intelligent design methods. Then, the above three important research advances and trends of intelligently designed on-chip optical interconnection devices are analyzed in detail. At the same time, the applications of phase change materials in the design of controllable photonic devices are also reviewed. Finally, the future development of intelligently designed on-chip optical interconnection devices is discussed.

Keywords:

on-chip optical interconnection device /
intelligent design method /
phase change material /
integrated photonic circuit

作者及机构信息

1.
国防科技大学理学院, 长沙　410073

2.
国防科技大学计算机学院, 长沙　410073

3.
重庆理工大学两江人工智能学院, 重庆　400054

4.
西南大学人工智能学院, 重庆　400715

5.
广西大学计算机与电子信息学院, 南宁　530004

6.
深圳大学物理与光电工程学院, 深圳　518060

7.
南京邮电大学通信与信息工程学院, 南京　210023

通信作者: 杨俊波, yangjunbo@nudt.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 60907003, 61805278, 12272407, 62275269, 62275271)、国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2022YFF0706005)、中国博士后科学基金(批准号: 2018M633704)、国防科技大学科研计划(批准号: JC13-02-13, ZK17-03-01)、湖南省自然科学基金(批准号: 13JJ3001)和新世纪高校优秀人才计划(批准号: NCET-12-0142)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
College of Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

2.
College of Computer, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

3.
School of Artificial Intelligence, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China

4.
College of Artificial Intelligence, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

5.
School of Computer, Electronic and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

6.
College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

7.
School of Communication and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China

Corresponding author: Yang Jun-Bo, yangjunbo@nudt.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60907003, 61805278, 12272407, 62275269, 62275271), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFF0706005), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M633704), the Scientific Research Program of National University of Defense Technology, China (Grant Nos. JC13-02-13, ZK17-03-01), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 13JJ3001), and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. NCET-12-0142).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	周治平 2021 硅基光电子学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第361页 Zhou Z P 2021 Silicon-based Optoelectronics (Beijing: Science Press) p361
[2]	周培基, 李智勇, 俞育德, 余金中 2014 物理学报 63 104211 Google Scholar Zhou P J, Li Z Y, Yu Y D, Yu J Z 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 104211 Google Scholar
[3]	Arumugam M 2001 Pramana J. Phys. 57 849 Google Scholar
[4]	Han L S, Kuo B P P, Alic N, Radic S 2018 Opt. Express 26 14800 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang Y, Gao S T, Wang K, Skafidas E 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 2053 Google Scholar
[6]	Sia J X B, Wang W J, Guo X, Zhou J, Zhang Z C, Rouifed M S, Li X, Qiao Z L, Liu C Y, Littlejohns C, Reed G T, Wang H 2019 IEEE Photonics J. 11 1 Google Scholar
[7]	Nguyen V H, Kim I K, Seok T J 2020 Appl. Sci. 10 4507 Google Scholar
[8]	Xu H N, Shi Y C 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 5047 Google Scholar
[9]	Chung K K, Chan H P, Chu P L 2006 Opt. Commun. 267 367 Google Scholar
[10]	Tao S H, Fang Q, Song J F, Yu M B, Lo G Q, Kwong D L 2008 Opt. Express 16 21456 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhang Y, Qin X J, Wang J D, Yu Y F, Wei Z J, Zhang Z M 2022 Chin. Opt. Lett. 20 122701 Google Scholar
[12]	Wu Q, Zhu Y X, Zhuge Q B, Hu W S 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 7297 Google Scholar
[13]	Wang X W, Chen Z W, Yin M Z, Wang W, Li Z B, Ni W H, Li F 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 41 2323 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhai W L, Wen A J, Gao Y S, Shan D J, Fan Y Y 2022 IEEE T. Microw. Theory 70 1821 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhu S Y, Liu B, Ren J X, Wu X Y, Mao Y Y, Bai Y, Zhang H J, Yuan L Z, Zhang M T, Zhu X 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 4599 Google Scholar
[16]	Liu Y, Ding R, Li Q, Xuan Z, Li Y C, Yang Y S, Lim A E J, Lo P G Q, Bergman K, Baehr-Jones T, Hochberg M 2014 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition San Francisco, USA, March 09–13, 2014 pTh4G.6
[17]	Yu Y, Chen G Y, Sima C T, Zhang X L 2017 Opt. Express 25 28330 Google Scholar
[18]	Sun C L, Wu W H, Yu Y, Chen G Y, Zhang X L, Chen X, Thomson D J, Reed G T 2018 Nanophotonics 7 1571 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhou D, Sun C L, Lai Y X, Yu Y, Zhang X L 2019 Opt. Express 27 10798 Google Scholar
[20]	Xu L, Leijtens X J M, Docter B, de Vries T, Smalbrugge E, Karouta F, Smit M K 2009 35th European Conference on Optical Communication Vienna, Austria, September 20–24, 2009 p24
[21]	Ou K, Yu F L, Li G H, Wang W J, Miroshnichenko A E, Huang L J, Wang P, Li T X, Li Z F, Chen X S, Lu W 2020 Sci. Adv. 6 eabc0711 Google Scholar
[22]	Tian Sh N, Guo H M, Hu J B, Zhuang S L 2019 Opt. Express 27 680 Google Scholar
[23]	Sakamoto J, Goh T, Katayose S, Kasahara R, Hashimoto T 2019 Opt. Commun. 433 221 Google Scholar
[24]	Dong F X, Liu A J, Ma P J, Zheng W H 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 495101 Google Scholar
[25]	Michinel H, Costa M F, Frazao O, Pant B, Zhang W W, Tran D, Banakar M, Du H, Yan X Z, Littlejohns C G, Reed G T, Thomson D J 2020 EPJ Web of Conferences 238 1007 Google Scholar
[26]	Chen H B, He Z J, Wang W 2018 Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 75 47 Google Scholar
[27]	Dai D X, Wang J 2014 IEEE Photonics Soc. Newslett. 28 8
[28]	Dai D X, Bowers J E 2011 Opt. Express 19 10940 Google Scholar
[29]	Dai D X, Wang J, Shi Y C 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 1422 Google Scholar
[30]	Chesca B, John D, Cantor R 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 42601 Google Scholar
[31]	Nath J P, Dhingra N, Saxena G J, Sharma E K 2020 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 32 595 Google Scholar
[32]	Jiang X P, Yuan H, He X, Du T, Ma H S, Li X, Luo M Y, Zhang Z J, Huan C, Yu Y, Zhu G Y, Yan P G, Wu J G, Zhang Z F, Yang J B 2023 Nanophotonics 12 1891 Google Scholar
[33]	Maidment P, Sorel M 2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) San Jose, USA, May 15–20, 2022 p1
[34]	Jiang X P, Yuan H, Chen D B, Zhang Z J, Du T, Ma H S, Yang J B 2021 Adv. Opt. Mater. 9 2100575 Google Scholar
[35]	Jiang X P, Zhang Z J, Ma H S, Du T, Luo M Y, Liu D Q, Yang J B 2022 Opt. Express 30 18250 Google Scholar
[36]	Chang W J, Xu S Y, Cheng M F, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2020 Opt. Express 28 28343 Google Scholar
[37]	Shastri B J, Tait A N, Ferreira D L T, Pernice W H P, Bhaskaran H, Wright C D, Prucnal P R 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 102 Google Scholar
[38]	Li G H Y, Sekine R, Nehra R, Gray R M, Ledezma L, Guo Q S, Marandi A 2023 Nanophotonics 12 847 Google Scholar
[39]	Yeung C, Pham B, Tsai R, Fountaine K T, Raman A P 2022 ACS Photonics 10 884 Google Scholar
[40]	Jiang L, Li X Z, Wu Q X, Wang L H, Gao L 2021 Opt. Express 29 2521 Google Scholar
[41]	Meng C, Qiu J F, Tian Y, Ye Z, Wu J 2016 15th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN) Hangzhou, China, September 24–27, 2016 p1
[42]	An S S, Fowler C, Zheng B W, Shalaginov M Y, Tang H, Li H, Zhou L, Ding J, Agarwal A M, Rivero-Baleine C, Richardson K A, Gu T, Hu J J, Zhang H L 2019 ACS Photonics 6 3196 Google Scholar
[43]	Aoad A, Simsek M, Aydin Z 2017 Int. J. Numer. Model. 30 2129 Google Scholar
[44]	Ma L F, Li J, Liu Z H, Zhang Y X, Zhang N E, Zheng S Q, Lu C C 2021 Chin. Opt. Lett. 19 11301 Google Scholar
[45]	Liu Y J, Sun W Z, Xie H C, Zhang N, Xu K, Yao Y, Xiao S M, Song Q H 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 2482 Google Scholar
[46]	An X P, Cao Y, Wei Y X, Zhou Z H, Hu T, Feng X, He G Q, Zhao M, Yang Z Y 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 3881 Google Scholar
[47]	Wiecha P R, Arbouet A, Girard C, Muskens O L 2021 Photonics Res. 9 182 Google Scholar
[48]	Zeng Z S, Lu L H, He P X, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2021 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 33 1289 Google Scholar
[49]	Yeung C, Ho D, Zhang Z, Raman A P, Pham B, Fountaine K T, Levy K 2022 ACS Photonics 9 1577 Google Scholar
[50]	Yu Z J, Cui H R, Sun X K 2017 Photonics Res. 5 15 Google Scholar
[51]	Ma T G, Tobah M, Wang H Z, Guo L J 2022 Opto-Electronic Science 1 210011 Google Scholar
[52]	Schubert M F, Cheung A, Williamson I, Spyra A, Alexander D H 2022 ACS Photonics 9 2327 Google Scholar
[53]	Hodge J A, Mishra K V, Zaghloul A I 2021 arXiv: 2101.09131 [physics. app-ph
[54]	Campbell S D, Werner D H, Werner P L 2021 Proc. SPIE 11769 117690N Google Scholar
[55]	Deotare P B 2012 Ph. D. Dissertation (Boston: Harvard University
[56]	Urban P J, Pluk E G C, KleIn E J, Koonen A M J, Khoe G D, de Waardt H 2006 2nd Institution of Engineering and Technology International Conference Osaka, Japan, June 21–22, 2006 p93
[57]	Shen Y C, Harris N C, Skirlo S, Prabhu M, Baehr-Jones T, Hochberg M, Sun X, Zhao S, Larochelle H, Englund D, Soljačić M 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 441 Google Scholar
[58]	Yu T, Ma X, Pastor E, George J K, Wall S, Miscuglio M, Simpson R E, Sorger V J 2021 arXiv: 2102.10398 [physics. optics
[59]	Wu C M, Yu H S, Lee S, Peng R M, Takeuchi I, Li M 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 96 Google Scholar
[60]	Chen H, Li J T, Shang Z Y, Wang G Q, Zhang Z M, Zhao Z X, Zhang M Y, Yin J D, Wang J Z, Guo K, Yang J B, Yan P G 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2200254 Google Scholar
[61]	Yang K Y, Skarda J, Cotrufo M, Dutt A, Ahn G H, Sawaby M, Vercruysse D, Arbabian A, Fan S H, Alù A, Vučković J 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 369 Google Scholar
[62]	Wu Y T, Shi Y C, Zhao Y, Li L Y, Wu P H, Dai P, Fang T, Chen X F 2019 Opt. Express 27 38541 Google Scholar
[63]	Huang L C, Whitehead J, Colburn S, Majumdar A 2020 Photonics Res. 8 1613 Google Scholar
[64]	Guo L H, Hu Z L, Wan R Q, Long L Y, Li T, Yan J C, Lin Y, Zhang L, Zhu W H, Wang L C 2018 Nanophotonics 8 171 Google Scholar
[65]	Ossiander M, Meretska M L, Hampel H K, Lim S W D, K N, Jauk T, Capasso F, Schultze M 2023 Science 380 59 Google Scholar
[66]	Li T Y, Xu X H, Fu B Y, Wang S M, Li B J, Wang Z L, Zhu S N 2021 Photonics Res. 9 1062 Google Scholar
[67]	Guo W P, Liang W Y, Cheng C W, Wu W L, Wang Y T, Sun Q, Zu S, Misawa H, Cheng P J, Chang S W, Ahn H, Lin M, Gwo S 2020 Nano Lett. 20 2857 Google Scholar
[68]	Ollanik A J, Smith J A, Belue M J, Escarra M D 2018 ACS Photonics 5 1351 Google Scholar
[69]	Huang J, Ma H S, Chen D B, Yuan H, Zhang J P, Li Z K, Han J M, Wu J G, Yang J B 2021 Nanophotonics 10 1011 Google Scholar
[70]	Sanchis P, Villalba P, Cuesta F, Hakansson A, Griol A, Galan J V, Brimont A, Marti J 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 2760 Google Scholar
[71]	Yu Z J, Cui H R, Sun X K 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 3093 Google Scholar
[72]	Liu Z H, Liu X H, Xiao Z Y, Lu C C, Wang H Q, Wu Y, Hu X Y, Liu Y C, Zhang H Y, Zhang X D 2019 Optica 6 1367 Google Scholar
[73]	Kennedy J, Eberhart R 1995 ICNN95-International Conference on Neural Networks Perth, WA, Australia, November 27–December 1, 1995 p1942
[74]	Chen W W, Zhang B H, Wang P J, Dai S X, Liang W, Li H X, Fu Q, Li J, Li Y, Dai T G, Yu H, Yang J Y 2020 Opt. Express 28 30701 Google Scholar
[75]	Qin F, Liu B Q, Zhu L W, Lei J, Fang W, Hu D J, Zhu Y, Ma W D, Wang B W, Shi T, Cao Y Y, Guan B O, Qiu C W, Lu Y R, Li X P 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 32 Google Scholar
[76]	Chen W W, Lin J, Li H X, Wang P J, Dai S X, Liu Y X, Yao R K, Li J, Fu Q, Dai T G, Yang J Y 2022 Opt. Express 30 46236 Google Scholar
[77]	Seldowitz M A, Allebach J P, Sweeney D W 1987 Appl. Optics 26 2788 Google Scholar
[78]	Shen B, Wang P, Polson R, Menon R 2014 Opt. Express 22 27175 Google Scholar
[79]	Shen B, Wang P, Polson R, Menon R 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 378 Google Scholar
[80]	Wen X, Xu K, Song Q H 2016 Photonics Res. 4 209 Google Scholar
[81]	Zhou F Y, Lu L L Z, Zhang M M, Chang W J, Li D Y, Deng L, Liu D M 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) San Jose, USA, May 14–19, 2017 p1
[82]	Cao Y, Li S T, Petzold L, Serban R 2003 SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24 1076 Google Scholar
[83]	Jameson A 2003 Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method (Brussels: Von Karman Institute
[84]	McNamara A, Treuille A, Popović Z 2004 ACM Transactions On Graphics (TOG) 3 449 Google Scholar
[85]	Pedersen C B W, Allinger P 2006 IUTAM Symposium on Topological Design Optimization of Structures, Machines and Materials, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2006 p229
[86]	Lalau-Keraly C M, Bhargava S, Miller O D, Yablonovitch E 2013 Opt. Express 21 21693 Google Scholar
[87]	Hughes T W, Minkov M, Williamson I A D, Fan S H 2018 ACS Photonics 5 4781 Google Scholar
[88]	Michaels A, Yablonovitch E 2018 Opt. Express 26 4766 Google Scholar
[89]	Dai Y H 2002 SIAM J. Optimiz. 13 693 Google Scholar
[90]	Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J 1986 Nature 323 533 Google Scholar
[91]	Sermanet P, Eigen D, Zhang X, Mathieu M, Fergus R, LeCun Y 2013 arXiv: 1312.6229 [cs.CV
[92]	Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J 2016 IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 38 142 Google Scholar
[93]	Ren S Q, He K M, Girshick R, Sun J 2017 IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 39 1137 Google Scholar
[94]	Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Las Vegas, USA, June 27–30, 2016 p779
[95]	汪宋, 费树岷 2019 工业控制计算机 32 103 Wang S, Fei S 2019 Industrial Control Computer 32 103
[96]	Lin T Y, Dollar P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S 2016 arXiv: 1612.03144 [cs.CV
[97]	Joseph R A F 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Honolulu, USA, July 21–26, 2017 p6517
[98]	Lin T Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K M, Dollar P 2020 IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 42 318 Google Scholar
[99]	Redmon J, Farhadi A 2018 arXiv: 1804.02767v1 [cs.CV
[100]	Tan M X, Pang R M, Le Q V 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Seattle, USA, June 13–19, 2020 p10778
[101]	Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y 2014 Statistics 3 1467 Google Scholar
[102]	Nguyen H Q, Nguyen T M, Vu H H, Nguyen V V, Nguyen P T, Dao T N M, Tran K H, Dinh K Q 2019 6th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS) Hanoi, Vietnam, December 12–13, 2019 p240
[103]	Wu Y H, Schuster M, Chen Z F, Le Q V, Norouzi M 2016 arXiv: 1609.08144 [cs.CL
[104]	Cho K, van Merrienboer B, Bahdanau D, Bengio Y 2014 Statistics 2 1467 Google Scholar
[105]	Sennrich R, Haddow B, Birch A 2015 arXiv: 1511.06709 [cs.CL
[106]	Johnson M, Schuster M, Le Q V, Krikun M, Wu Y H, Chen Z F, Thorat N, Viégas F, Wattenberg M, Corrado G, Dean M H 2017 T. Assoc. Comput. Ling. 5 339 Google Scholar
[107]	Jean S, Cho K, Memisevic R, Bengio Y 2014 arXiv: 1412.2007 [cs.CL
[108]	Tu Z P, Lu Z D, Liu Y, Liu X H, Li H 2016 arXiv: 1601.04811 [cs.CL
[109]	Gao L, Mi H B, Zhu B Q, Feng D W, Li Y C, Peng Y X 2019 IEEE Access 7 105319 Google Scholar
[110]	Li Y C, Feng D W, Lu M L, Li D S 2019 In Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management: 12th International Conference, KSEM Athens, Greece, August 28–30, 2019 p37
[111]	Li Y C, Chen H X, Sun X G, Sun Z C, Li L, Cui L Z, Yu P S, Xu G D 2021 CIKM '21: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management Queensland Australia, November 1–5, 2021 p988
[112]	Li Y C, Chen H X, Li Y L, Li L, Yu P S, Xu G D 2023 IEEE T. Knowl. Data En. (early access) DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2023.3237741
[113]	Chen H X, Li Y C, Sun X G, Xu G D, Yin H Z 2021 WSDM '21: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining Virtual Event Israel, March 8–12, 2021 p1056
[114]	Hammond A M, Camacho R M 2019 Opt. Express 27 29620 Google Scholar
[115]	Tu X, Xie W S, Chen Z M, Ge M F, Huang T Y, Song C L, Fu H Y 2021 J. Lightwave Technol. 39 2790 Google Scholar
[116]	An S S, Zheng B W, Shalaginov M Y, Tang H, Li H, Zhou L, Dong Y X, Haerinia M, Agarwal A M, Rivero B C, Kang M, Richardson K A, Gu T, Hu J J, Fowler C, Zhang H L 2022 Adv. Opt. Mater. 10 2102113 Google Scholar
[117]	Liu D J, Tan Y X, Khoram E F, Yu Z F 2018 ACS Photonics 5 1365 Google Scholar
[118]	Ren Y M, Zhang L X, Wang W Q, Wang X Y, Lei Y F, Xue Y L, Sun X C, Zhang W F 2021 Photonics Res. 9 B247 Google Scholar
[119]	Zhao Z Y, You J, Zhang J, Du S Y, Tao Z L, Tang Y H, Jiang T 2022 Nanophotonics 11 4465 Google Scholar
[120]	Yeung C, Tsai R, Pham B, King B, Kawagoe Y, Ho D, Liang J, Knight M W, Raman A P 2021 Adv. Opt. Mater 9 2100548 Google Scholar
[121]	Meindl J D 2003 Comput. Sci. Eng. 5 20 Google Scholar
[122]	Mack C A. 2011 IEEE T. Semiconduct. M. 24 202 Google Scholar
[123]	Schaller R R 1997 IEEE Spectrum 34 52 Google Scholar
[124]	Zhang Y, Yang S Y, Lim A E J, Lo G Q, Galland C, Baehr-Jones T, Hochberg M 2013 Opt. Express 21 1310 Google Scholar
[125]	Kumari S, Prince S 2022 International Conference on Wireless Communications Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET) Chennai, India, March 24–26, 2022 p231
[126]	Chang W J, Ren X S, Ao Y Q, Lu L H, Cheng M F, Deng L, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2018 Opt. Express 26 24135 Google Scholar
[127]	Xu J F, Liu Y J, Guo X Y, Song Q H, Xu K 2022 Opt. Express 30 26266 Google Scholar
[128]	Zhu J B, Chao Q, Huang H Y, Zhao Y X, Li Y, Tao L, She X J, Liao H, Huang R, Zhu Z J, Liu X, Sheng Z, Gan F W 2021 Appl. Opt. 60 413 Google Scholar
[129]	Sheng J C, Liu Y J, Xu K 2019 The International Photonics and Optoelectronics Meeting Wuhan China, November 11–14, 2019 paper OW3D.6
[130]	Chang W J, Lu L L Z, Ren X S, Li D Y, Pan Z P, Cheng M F, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2018 Opt. Express 26 8162 Google Scholar
[131]	Ding Y H, Xu J, Da R F, Huang B, Ou H Y, Peucheret C 2013 Opt. Express 21 10376 Google Scholar
[132]	Xie H C, Liu Y J, Wang S, Wang Y J, Yao Y, Song Q H, Du J B, He Z Y, Xu K 2020 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 32 166 Google Scholar
[133]	Zhou H L, Wang Y L, Gao X Y, Gao D S, Dong J J, Huang D M, Li F, Alexander W P K, Zhang X L 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2100521 Google Scholar
[134]	Wang J, He S L, Dai D X 2014 Laser Photonics Rev. 8 L18 Google Scholar
[135]	Li C L, Liu D J, Dai D X 2019 Nanophotonics 8 227 Google Scholar
[136]	Jiang X H, Wu H, Dai D X 2018 Opt. Express 26 17680 Google Scholar
[137]	Chang W J, Lu L L Z, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2018 Optical Fiber Communication (OFC) Conference San Diego, USA, March 11–15, 2018 p1
[138]	Gabrielli L H, Liu D, Johnson S G, Lipson M 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 1217 Google Scholar
[139]	Liu Y J, Xu K, Wang S, Shen W H, Xie H C, Wang Y J, Xiao S M, Yao Y, Du J B, He Z Y, Song Q H 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3263 Google Scholar
[140]	Wu H, Tan Y, Dai D X 2017 Opt. Express 25 6069 Google Scholar
[141]	Huang J, Yang J B, Chen D B, He X, Han Y X, Zhang J J, Zhang Z J 2018 Photonics Res. 6 574 Google Scholar
[142]	Piggott A Y, Petykiewicz J, Su L, Vučković J 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 1786 Google Scholar
[143]	Yu L H, Yin Y L, Shi Y C, Dai D X, He S L 2016 J. Operat. Theo. 3 159 Google Scholar
[144]	Gentry C M, Zeng X, Popović M A 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5689 Google Scholar
[145]	Wuttig M, Bhaskaran H, Taubner T 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 465 Google Scholar
[146]	Sherwood-Droz N, Wang H, Chen L, Lee B G, Lipson M 2008 Opt. Express 16 15915 Google Scholar
[147]	Ono M, Hata M, Tsunekawa M, Nozaki K, Sumikura H, Chiba H, Notomi M 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 37 Google Scholar
[148]	Gong Z L, Yang F Y, Wang L T, Chen R, Wu J Q, Grigoropoulos C P, Yao J 2021 J. Appl. Phys. 129 30902 Google Scholar
[149]	Fang Z R, Chen R, Tara V, Majumdar A 2023 Sci. Bull. 68 783 Google Scholar
[150]	Xu P P, Zheng J J, Doylend J K. , Majumdar A 2019 ACS Photonics 6 553 Google Scholar
[151]	Wang Q, Rogers E T F, Gholipour B, Wang C M, Yuan G H, Teng J H, Zheludev N I 2016 Nat. Photonics 10 60 Google Scholar
[152]	Zhang Y F, Fowler C, Liang J H, Azhar B, Shalaginov M Y, Deckoff-Jones S, An S S, Chou J B, Roberts C M, Liberman V, Kang M, Ríos C, Richardson K A, Rivero-Baleine C, Gu T, Zhang H L, Hu J J 2021 Nat. Nanotechnol. 16 661 Google Scholar
[153]	Shportko K, Kremers S, Woda M, Lencer D, Robertson J, Wuttig M 2008 Nat. Mater. 7 653 Google Scholar
[154]	Kim S, Burr G W, Nam W K Sung W 2019 MRS Bull. 44 710 Google Scholar
[155]	Loke D, Lee T H, Wang W J, Zhao R, Shi L P, Yeo Y C, Chong T C, Elliott S R 2012 Science 336 1566 Google Scholar
[156]	Orava J, Greer A L, Gholipour B, Hewak D W, Smith C E 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 279 Google Scholar
[157]	Li W F, Cao X Y, Song S N, Wu L S, Wang R B, Jin Y, Song Z T, Wu A M 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2100717 Google Scholar
[158]	Stegmaier M, Iacute C R, Bhaskaran H, Wright C D, Pernice W H P 2016 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1600346 Google Scholar
[159]	Feldmann J, Youngblood N, Wright C D, Bhaskaran H, Pernice W H P 2019 Nature 569 208 Google Scholar
[160]	Feldmann J, Youngblood N, Karpov M, Gehring H, Li X, Stappers M, Le Gallo M, Fu X, Lukashchuk A, Raja A. S, Liu J, Wright C D, Sebastian A, Kippenberg T J, Pernice W H P, Bhaskaran H 2021 Nature 589 52 Google Scholar
[161]	Pernice W H P, Bhaskaran H 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 171101 Google Scholar
[162]	Raoux S, Xiong F, Wuttig M, Pop E 2014 MRS Bull. 39 703 Google Scholar
[163]	Zhang Y F, Chou J B, Li J Y, Li H S, Du Q Y, Yadav A, Zhou Si, Shalaginov M Y, Fang Z R, Zhong H K, Roberts C, Robinson P, Bohlin B, Ríos C, Lin H T, Kang M, Gu T, Warner J, Liberman V, Richardson K, Hu J J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 4279 Google Scholar
[164]	Fang Z R, Zheng J J, Saxena A, Whitehead J, Chen Y Y, Majumdar A 2021 Adv. Opt. Mater. 9 2002049 Google Scholar
[165]	Delaney M, Zeimpekis I, Lawson D, Hewak D W, Muskens O L 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 2002447 Google Scholar
[166]	Yang S, Shamim A, Vaseem M 2019 Adv. Mater. Technol. 4 11 Google Scholar
[167]	Wang N N, Li T T, Sun B S, Wang Z, Zhou L J, Gu T Y 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 4088 Google Scholar
[168]	Chen H X, Jia H, Wang T, Tian Y H, Yang J H 2020 J. Lightwave Technol. 38 1874 Google Scholar
[169]	Ma H S, Yang J B, Huang J, Zhang Z J, Zhang K W 2021 Results Phys. 26 104384 Google Scholar
[170]	Delaney M, Zeimpekis I, Du H, Yan X Z, Banakar M, Thomson D J, Hewak D W, Muskens O L 2021 Sci. Adv. 7
[171]	Yuan H, Wu J G, Zhang J P, Pu X, Zhang Z F, Yu Y, Yang J B 2022 Nanomaterials 12 669 Google Scholar
[172]	Piggott A Y, Lu J, Babinec T M, Lagoudakis K G, Petykiewicz J, Vučković J 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 7210 Google Scholar
[173]	Ma H S, Luo M Y, He J, Du T, Zhang Z J, Jiang X P, He X, Fang L, Yang J B 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 7869 Google Scholar
[174]	Ma H S, Du T, Zhang Z J, Jiang X P, Fang L, Yang J B 2023 Opt. Commun. 526 128912 Google Scholar
[175]	Dai D X, Wu H 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 2346 Google Scholar
[176]	Huang J, Yang J B, Chen D B, Bai W, Han J M, Zhang Z J, Zhang J J, He X, Han Y X, Liang L M 2020 Nanophotonics 9 159 Google Scholar
[177]	Ruan X K, Li H, Chu T 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 7142 Google Scholar
[178]	Li C L, Zhang M, Xu H N, Tan Y, Shi Y C, Dai D X 2021 PhotoniX 2 1991 Google Scholar
[179]	Dai D X, Li C L, Wang S P, Wu H, Shi Y C, Wu Z H, Gao S M, Dai T G, Yu H, Tsang H K 2018 Laser Photonics Rev. 12 1700109 Google Scholar
[180]	Shen W W, Chen K N 2017 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 56 Google Scholar
[181]	Moreira R, Barton J, Belt M, Huffman T, Blumenthal D 2013 Advanced Photonics CongressIntegrated Photonics Research, Silicon and Nanophotonics Rio Grande, USA, July 14–17, 2013 paper IT2A.4
[182]	Sodagar M, Pourabolghasem R, Eftekhar A A, Adibi A 2014 Opt. Express 22 16767 Google Scholar
[183]	Zheng X, Cunningham J E, Shubin I, Simons J, Asghari M, Feng D, Lei H, Zheng D, Liang H, Kung C C, Luff J, Sze T, Cohen D, Krishnamoorthy A V 2008 Opt. Express 16 15052 Google Scholar
[184]	Yu Z X, Qiu J F, Dong Z L, Zheng L, Guo H X, Wu J 2018 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP) Hangzhou, China, October 26–29, 2018 p1

施引文献

图 1 典型的GA流程图及GA在片上光子器件设计领域的应用　(a) 一个典型的GA流程图; (b) 利用GA设计的模式可扩展的交叉波导^[70]; (c) 利用GA设计的超紧凑偏振旋转器^[71]; (d) 利用GA设计的波长路由器^[72]

Fig. 1. Typical flowchart of GA and its application in on-chip photonic devices design: (a) A typical GA flowchart; (b) mode-extensible crossing waveguide designed by GA^[70]; (c) ultra-compact polarization rotator designed by GA^[71]; (d) wavelength router designed by GA^[72].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 PSO算法的流程图及PSO算法在光子器件设计领域的应用　(a) PSO算法的流程图; (b) 利用PSO算法设计的片上偏振分束器^[74]; (c) 利用PSO算法优化设计的单层超临界透镜的SEM图^[75]; (d) 利用PSO算法设计的片上多模式功率分束器^[76]

Fig. 2. Flowchart of PSO algorithm and its application in photonic devices design: (a) Flowchart of PSO algorithm; (b) on-chip polarization beam splitter designed by PSO algorithm^[74]; (c) SEM image of single-layer supercritical lens optimized by PSO algorithm^[75]; (d) on-chip multi-mode power beam splitter designed by PSO algorithm^[76].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 DBS算法的流程图及DBS算法在光子器件设计领域的应用　(a) DBS算法具体优化流程图; (b) 基于DBS算法设计的偏振分束器的结构图, 以及波长为1550 nm的TE和TM通过该器件时的光场图^[79]; (c) 利用改良的DBS算法设计的离散化纳米结构的侧视图^[80]; (d) 利用DBS算法设计的双通道波长解复用器及不同波长的光通过该器件时的光场图^[81]

Fig. 3. Flowchart of DBS algorithm and its application in photonic device design: (a) Flowchart of DBS algorithm; (b) structure diagram of the polarization beam splitter designed by DBS algorithm, and the light field diagram of TE and TM with a wavelength of 1550 nm passing through the device^[79]; (c) side view of the discretized nanostructures designed by the improved DBS algorithm^[80]; (d) dual-channel wavelength demultiplexer designed by DBS algorithm, and the optical field diagram when light of different wavelengths passing through the device^[81].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 AM在光子器件设计领域的应用　(a) 利用AM设计的功率分束器^[86]; (b), (c) 基于AM提出的两种非线性光子器件^[87]; (d) 使用AM优化的垂直光栅耦合器^[88]

Fig. 4. Application of AM in photonic device design: (a) Power splitter designed by AM^[86]; (b), (c) two nonlinear photonic devices designed by AM^[87]; (d) vertical grating couplers optimized by AM^[88].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 神经网络在光子器件设计领域的应用　(a) 基于人工神经网络架构设计的布拉格光栅^[114]; (b) 利用深度神经网络设计的光栅耦合器^[115]; (c) 用来预测超表面中的超原子光响应的PNN架构^[116]

Fig. 5. Application of neural network in photonic device design: (a) Bragg grating based on ANN architecture^[114]; (b) grating couplers designed using DNN^[115]; (c) PNN architecture for predicting meta-atom light responses in metasurfaces^[116].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 用来解决一些具体技术问题的神经网络架构　(a) “正、逆向串联”神经网络示意图以及利用该网络设计的多层膜系结构^[117]; (b) 基于GA的深度神经网络^[118]; (c) 利用少样本数据增强迭代算法优化得到的二维可编程手性超材料^[119]; (d) 一种基于全局深度学习的逆设计框架的训练和设计过程^[120]

Fig. 6. Neural network architectures used to solve some specific technical problems: (a) Schematic of the “forward and backward series” neural network and the multilayer structure designed by this network^[117]; (b) GA-based DNN^[118]; (c) two-dimensional programmable chiral metamaterial optimized by data enhanced iterative few-sample algorithm^[119]; (d) training and design process of an inverse design framework based on global deep learning^[120].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 几种由不同方法设计的功率分束器及对比　(a)利用PSO算法设计的波长不敏感的单模功率分束器^[124]; (b) 利用传统方法设计的基于S形曲线脊波导的波长不敏感单模功率分束器^[125]; (c) 传统方法设计双模功率分束器的原理示意图(左)和基于对称优化的DBS算法设计的双模功率分束器(右)^[126]; (d) 利用多种算法分阶段优化设计的超宽波段适用的双模功率分束器^[127]; (e) 基于传统方法设计的任意分束比的功率分束器架构示意图^[128]; (f) 基于QPSO算法设计的几种不同分束比的功率分束器^[129]

Fig. 7. Several power splitters designed by different methods and their comparison: (a) Wavelength insensitive single-mode power splitter designed by PSO algorithm^[124]; (b) wavelength insensitive single-mode power splitter based on S-shaped curved ridge waveguide designed by conventional methods^[125]; (c) schematic of dual-mode power splitter designed by conventional method (left) and dual-mode power splitter designed by symmetric-optimize-DBS algorithm (right)^[126]; (d) dual-mode power splitter suitable for ultra-wide band optimized by multiple algorithms^[127]; (e) schematic of the power splitter with arbitrary split ratio designed by conventional methods^[128]; (f) power splitters with different split ratios designed by QPSO algorithm^[129].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 几种由不同方法设计的模式(分解)复用器及对比　(a) 基于DBS算法设计的二阶模式复用器^[130]; (b)基于锥形定向耦合器的二阶模式复用器^[131]; (c), (d) 两种由DBS算法设计的四阶模式(分解)复用器^[132,133]; (e)八阶模式/偏振(分解)复用器的光学显微镜成像图^[134]

Fig. 8. Several mode (de)multiplexers designed by different methods and their comparison: (a) Two-mode multiplexer based on the DBS algorithm^[130]; (b) two-mode multiplexer based on conical directional coupler^[131]; (c), (d) two kinds of four-mode (de)multiplexers designed by the DBS algorithm^[132,133]; (e) optical microscope image of the eight-mode/polarization (de)multiplexers^[134].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 几种由不同方法设计的单、多模弯曲波导及对比　(a) 基于DBS算法设计的单模式90°弯曲波导^[133]; (b) 传统方法设计的基于修正欧拉曲线的多模90°弯曲波导^[136]; (c) 利用DBS算法设计的双模90°弯曲波导^[137]; (d) 基于TO的使用了灰度刻蚀技术的三模90°弯曲波导^[138]; (e) 利用DBS算法设计的三模90°弯曲波导^[139]; (f) 利用DBS算法设计的三模90°弯曲波导的模拟光场分布示意图

Fig. 9. Comparison of several single- and multi-mode bending waveguides designed by different methods: (a) Single-mode 90° bending waveguide designed by DBS algorithm^[133]; (b) four-mode 90° bending waveguide based on modified Euler curve designed by conventional methods^[136]; (c) two-mode 90° bending waveguide designed by DBS algorithm^[137]; (d) three-mode 90° bending waveguide based on TO using grayscale etching technology^[138]; (e) three-mode 90° bending waveguide designed by the DBS algorithm^[139]; (f) schematic of simulated light field distribution of the three-mode 90° bending waveguide in (e).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 几种利用智能设计方法优化传统光互连器件得到的结果及其对比器件　(a) 利用PSO算法优化反锥形耦合器结构设计出的片上偏振分束器^[74]; (b) 完全基于传统耦合模理论设计的偏振分束器^[140]; (c) 利用AM优化耦合区域间隙设计的几种用于不同波长条件下的偏振分束器, 以及其中的横向和纵向的模拟电磁场密度分布^[141]; (d) 利用带有制造约束的水平集方法设计的功率分束器, 以及其中的模拟电磁场密度分布^[142]

Fig. 10. Several results obtained by using intelligent design methods to optimize conventional optical interconnect devices, and their comparison devices: (a) On-chip polarization beam splitter designed by using the PSO algorithm to optimize the anti-conical coupler^[74]; (b) polarization beam splitters designed by conventional methods^[140]; (c) several polarization beam splitters designed for different wavelength conditions using the AM to optimize the coupling region gap, and their simulated electromagnetic field density distributions^[141]; (d) power splitter designed using a level set method with manufacturing constraints, and the simulated electromagnetic field density distribution in it^[142].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 相变材料的典型相变过程和相变材料在可调控光器件领域的应用　(a) 一个典型的相变过程的示意图; (b)基于相变材料设计的全光神经突触网络; (c) 基于相变材料设计的相变存储器单元; (d) 基于相变材料设计的可调控超表面

Fig. 11. Typical phase change process of phase change materials and their application in the field of controllable optical devices: (a) Diagram of a typical phase change process; (b) all-optical synaptic networks based on phase change materials; (c) phase-change memory cell based on phasechange material; (d) controllable metasurface based on phase change material.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 基于传统方法设计的可调控片上光互连器件　(a) 几种可调控方向性耦合开关的光学显微镜图和细节部分的SEM图^[150]; (b) 一种高消光比的可调控光开关的结构示意图和调控效果光场图^[157]

Fig. 12. Controllable on-chip optical interconnection devices designed by traditional methods: (a) Optical microscope images of several controllable directional coupling switches and the SEM images of their details^[150]; (b) structural and performance of the optical switch with a high ER^[157].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 利用智能设计方法设计的可调控片上光互连器件　(a) 基于DBS算法设计的一种可调控模式转换器^[168]; (b) 基于DBS算法设计的可调控三模式纳米光子波导开关^[169]; (c) 基于像素化相变材料设计的功率分束比可调的功率分束器^[170]; (d) 基于DBS算法设计的任意功率分束比的功率分束器^[171]

Fig. 13. Controllable on-chip optical interconnection devices designed by intelligent methods: (a) Controllable mode converter based on the DBS algorithm^[168]; (b) controllable three-mode nanophotonic waveguide switch based on the DBS algorithm^[169]; (c) power splitter with arbitrary split ratio based on pixelated phase change material^[170]; (d) power splitter with arbitrary split ratio based on the DBS algorithm^[171].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 智能化设计的多用途集成光互连器件　(a) 波长分解复用光栅耦合器的SEM成像图^[172]; (b) 波长分解复用光栅耦合器的工作原理; (c) 模式转换偏振分束器的SEM成像图^[79]; (d)不同偏振态的光输入模式转换偏振分束器后该器件横截面中的模拟电磁场密度分布^[79]

Fig. 14. Multi-purpose integrated optical interconnection devices designed by intelligent methods: (a) SEM image of the wavelength demultiplexing grating coupler^[172]; (b) working principle of the wavelength demultiplexing grating coupler; (c) SEM image of the mode-switching polarization beam splitter^[79]; (d) the density distribution of the simulated electromagnetic field in the device^[79].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 智能化设计的模块化集成光互连器件　(a) 模块化集成的可调谐模式产生器^[173]; (b) 模块化集成的偏振转换器^[174]; (c) 由光子晶体光栅和聚焦波长解复用器直接相连得到的模块化集成光互连器件^[176]; (d) 模块化集成的偏振分束转换器, 由双层结构的偏振转换器和模式分解复用器直接相连而成^[177]

Fig. 15. Modular integrated optical interconnect devices designed by intelligent methods: (a) Modular integrated tunable mode generator^[173]; (b) modular integrated polarization converters^[174]; (c) modular integrated focusing wavelength demultiplexer^[176]; (d) modular integrated polarization beam-splitting converter^[177].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 智能化设计的多层光互连系统　(a) 基于氮化硅波导的层间垂直耦合器^[181]; (b) 利用GA设计的层间光栅耦合器^[182]; (c) 基于硅波导的层间反射镜^[183]; (d) 采用智能设计方法设计的硅层间光学通道^[184]

Fig. 16. Multi-layer optical interconnection systems designed by intelligent methods: (a) Interlayer vertical coupler based on silicon nitride waveguide^[181]; (b) interlayer grating coupler designed by the GA^[182]; (c) interlayer reflectors based on silicon waveguides^[183]; (d) silicon interlayer optical channel designed by intelligent method^[184].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 相同功能的智能化设计和传统方法设计的功率分束器的尺寸对比

Table 1. Size comparison of power beam splitters designed by intelligent and conventional design methods with the same function.

功率分束器类型智能化设计结果
最大长度/μm 传统设计结果
最大长度/μm

波长不敏感单模 2 >25
双模 2.88/5.4 >200
任意分束比 1.5 >45

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 相同(似)功能的智能化设计和传统方法设计的模式(分解)复用器的尺寸对比

Table 2. Size comparison of mode (de)multiplexers designed by intelligent and traditional design methods with the same (like) function.

模式(分解)复用器类型智能化设计结果
最大长度/μm 传统设计结果
最大长度

二阶 3 十微米量级
四阶/八阶(含偏振态) 6/4.8 百微米量级

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 相同(似)功能的智能化设计和传统方法设计的90°弯曲波导的尺寸对比

Table 3. Size comparison of bendings designed by intelligent and traditional design methods with the same (like) function.

弯曲波导类型智能化设计结果
转弯半径/μm 传统设计结果
转弯半径/μm

三模 2.75 78.8
其他多模 <3.6(双模) 45(4种TM模式)

下载: 导出CSV

[1]	周治平 2021 硅基光电子学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第361页 Zhou Z P 2021 Silicon-based Optoelectronics (Beijing: Science Press) p361
[2]	周培基, 李智勇, 俞育德, 余金中 2014 物理学报 63 104211 Google Scholar Zhou P J, Li Z Y, Yu Y D, Yu J Z 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 104211 Google Scholar
[3]	Arumugam M 2001 Pramana J. Phys. 57 849 Google Scholar
[4]	Han L S, Kuo B P P, Alic N, Radic S 2018 Opt. Express 26 14800 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang Y, Gao S T, Wang K, Skafidas E 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 2053 Google Scholar
[6]	Sia J X B, Wang W J, Guo X, Zhou J, Zhang Z C, Rouifed M S, Li X, Qiao Z L, Liu C Y, Littlejohns C, Reed G T, Wang H 2019 IEEE Photonics J. 11 1 Google Scholar
[7]	Nguyen V H, Kim I K, Seok T J 2020 Appl. Sci. 10 4507 Google Scholar
[8]	Xu H N, Shi Y C 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 5047 Google Scholar
[9]	Chung K K, Chan H P, Chu P L 2006 Opt. Commun. 267 367 Google Scholar
[10]	Tao S H, Fang Q, Song J F, Yu M B, Lo G Q, Kwong D L 2008 Opt. Express 16 21456 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhang Y, Qin X J, Wang J D, Yu Y F, Wei Z J, Zhang Z M 2022 Chin. Opt. Lett. 20 122701 Google Scholar
[12]	Wu Q, Zhu Y X, Zhuge Q B, Hu W S 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 7297 Google Scholar
[13]	Wang X W, Chen Z W, Yin M Z, Wang W, Li Z B, Ni W H, Li F 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 41 2323 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhai W L, Wen A J, Gao Y S, Shan D J, Fan Y Y 2022 IEEE T. Microw. Theory 70 1821 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhu S Y, Liu B, Ren J X, Wu X Y, Mao Y Y, Bai Y, Zhang H J, Yuan L Z, Zhang M T, Zhu X 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 4599 Google Scholar
[16]	Liu Y, Ding R, Li Q, Xuan Z, Li Y C, Yang Y S, Lim A E J, Lo P G Q, Bergman K, Baehr-Jones T, Hochberg M 2014 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition San Francisco, USA, March 09–13, 2014 pTh4G.6
[17]	Yu Y, Chen G Y, Sima C T, Zhang X L 2017 Opt. Express 25 28330 Google Scholar
[18]	Sun C L, Wu W H, Yu Y, Chen G Y, Zhang X L, Chen X, Thomson D J, Reed G T 2018 Nanophotonics 7 1571 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhou D, Sun C L, Lai Y X, Yu Y, Zhang X L 2019 Opt. Express 27 10798 Google Scholar
[20]	Xu L, Leijtens X J M, Docter B, de Vries T, Smalbrugge E, Karouta F, Smit M K 2009 35th European Conference on Optical Communication Vienna, Austria, September 20–24, 2009 p24
[21]	Ou K, Yu F L, Li G H, Wang W J, Miroshnichenko A E, Huang L J, Wang P, Li T X, Li Z F, Chen X S, Lu W 2020 Sci. Adv. 6 eabc0711 Google Scholar
[22]	Tian Sh N, Guo H M, Hu J B, Zhuang S L 2019 Opt. Express 27 680 Google Scholar
[23]	Sakamoto J, Goh T, Katayose S, Kasahara R, Hashimoto T 2019 Opt. Commun. 433 221 Google Scholar
[24]	Dong F X, Liu A J, Ma P J, Zheng W H 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 495101 Google Scholar
[25]	Michinel H, Costa M F, Frazao O, Pant B, Zhang W W, Tran D, Banakar M, Du H, Yan X Z, Littlejohns C G, Reed G T, Thomson D J 2020 EPJ Web of Conferences 238 1007 Google Scholar
[26]	Chen H B, He Z J, Wang W 2018 Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 75 47 Google Scholar
[27]	Dai D X, Wang J 2014 IEEE Photonics Soc. Newslett. 28 8
[28]	Dai D X, Bowers J E 2011 Opt. Express 19 10940 Google Scholar
[29]	Dai D X, Wang J, Shi Y C 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 1422 Google Scholar
[30]	Chesca B, John D, Cantor R 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 42601 Google Scholar
[31]	Nath J P, Dhingra N, Saxena G J, Sharma E K 2020 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 32 595 Google Scholar
[32]	Jiang X P, Yuan H, He X, Du T, Ma H S, Li X, Luo M Y, Zhang Z J, Huan C, Yu Y, Zhu G Y, Yan P G, Wu J G, Zhang Z F, Yang J B 2023 Nanophotonics 12 1891 Google Scholar
[33]	Maidment P, Sorel M 2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) San Jose, USA, May 15–20, 2022 p1
[34]	Jiang X P, Yuan H, Chen D B, Zhang Z J, Du T, Ma H S, Yang J B 2021 Adv. Opt. Mater. 9 2100575 Google Scholar
[35]	Jiang X P, Zhang Z J, Ma H S, Du T, Luo M Y, Liu D Q, Yang J B 2022 Opt. Express 30 18250 Google Scholar
[36]	Chang W J, Xu S Y, Cheng M F, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2020 Opt. Express 28 28343 Google Scholar
[37]	Shastri B J, Tait A N, Ferreira D L T, Pernice W H P, Bhaskaran H, Wright C D, Prucnal P R 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 102 Google Scholar
[38]	Li G H Y, Sekine R, Nehra R, Gray R M, Ledezma L, Guo Q S, Marandi A 2023 Nanophotonics 12 847 Google Scholar
[39]	Yeung C, Pham B, Tsai R, Fountaine K T, Raman A P 2022 ACS Photonics 10 884 Google Scholar
[40]	Jiang L, Li X Z, Wu Q X, Wang L H, Gao L 2021 Opt. Express 29 2521 Google Scholar
[41]	Meng C, Qiu J F, Tian Y, Ye Z, Wu J 2016 15th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN) Hangzhou, China, September 24–27, 2016 p1
[42]	An S S, Fowler C, Zheng B W, Shalaginov M Y, Tang H, Li H, Zhou L, Ding J, Agarwal A M, Rivero-Baleine C, Richardson K A, Gu T, Hu J J, Zhang H L 2019 ACS Photonics 6 3196 Google Scholar
[43]	Aoad A, Simsek M, Aydin Z 2017 Int. J. Numer. Model. 30 2129 Google Scholar
[44]	Ma L F, Li J, Liu Z H, Zhang Y X, Zhang N E, Zheng S Q, Lu C C 2021 Chin. Opt. Lett. 19 11301 Google Scholar
[45]	Liu Y J, Sun W Z, Xie H C, Zhang N, Xu K, Yao Y, Xiao S M, Song Q H 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 2482 Google Scholar
[46]	An X P, Cao Y, Wei Y X, Zhou Z H, Hu T, Feng X, He G Q, Zhao M, Yang Z Y 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 3881 Google Scholar
[47]	Wiecha P R, Arbouet A, Girard C, Muskens O L 2021 Photonics Res. 9 182 Google Scholar
[48]	Zeng Z S, Lu L H, He P X, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2021 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 33 1289 Google Scholar
[49]	Yeung C, Ho D, Zhang Z, Raman A P, Pham B, Fountaine K T, Levy K 2022 ACS Photonics 9 1577 Google Scholar
[50]	Yu Z J, Cui H R, Sun X K 2017 Photonics Res. 5 15 Google Scholar
[51]	Ma T G, Tobah M, Wang H Z, Guo L J 2022 Opto-Electronic Science 1 210011 Google Scholar
[52]	Schubert M F, Cheung A, Williamson I, Spyra A, Alexander D H 2022 ACS Photonics 9 2327 Google Scholar
[53]	Hodge J A, Mishra K V, Zaghloul A I 2021 arXiv: 2101.09131 [physics. app-ph
[54]	Campbell S D, Werner D H, Werner P L 2021 Proc. SPIE 11769 117690N Google Scholar
[55]	Deotare P B 2012 Ph. D. Dissertation (Boston: Harvard University
[56]	Urban P J, Pluk E G C, KleIn E J, Koonen A M J, Khoe G D, de Waardt H 2006 2nd Institution of Engineering and Technology International Conference Osaka, Japan, June 21–22, 2006 p93
[57]	Shen Y C, Harris N C, Skirlo S, Prabhu M, Baehr-Jones T, Hochberg M, Sun X, Zhao S, Larochelle H, Englund D, Soljačić M 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 441 Google Scholar
[58]	Yu T, Ma X, Pastor E, George J K, Wall S, Miscuglio M, Simpson R E, Sorger V J 2021 arXiv: 2102.10398 [physics. optics
[59]	Wu C M, Yu H S, Lee S, Peng R M, Takeuchi I, Li M 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 96 Google Scholar
[60]	Chen H, Li J T, Shang Z Y, Wang G Q, Zhang Z M, Zhao Z X, Zhang M Y, Yin J D, Wang J Z, Guo K, Yang J B, Yan P G 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2200254 Google Scholar
[61]	Yang K Y, Skarda J, Cotrufo M, Dutt A, Ahn G H, Sawaby M, Vercruysse D, Arbabian A, Fan S H, Alù A, Vučković J 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 369 Google Scholar
[62]	Wu Y T, Shi Y C, Zhao Y, Li L Y, Wu P H, Dai P, Fang T, Chen X F 2019 Opt. Express 27 38541 Google Scholar
[63]	Huang L C, Whitehead J, Colburn S, Majumdar A 2020 Photonics Res. 8 1613 Google Scholar
[64]	Guo L H, Hu Z L, Wan R Q, Long L Y, Li T, Yan J C, Lin Y, Zhang L, Zhu W H, Wang L C 2018 Nanophotonics 8 171 Google Scholar
[65]	Ossiander M, Meretska M L, Hampel H K, Lim S W D, K N, Jauk T, Capasso F, Schultze M 2023 Science 380 59 Google Scholar
[66]	Li T Y, Xu X H, Fu B Y, Wang S M, Li B J, Wang Z L, Zhu S N 2021 Photonics Res. 9 1062 Google Scholar
[67]	Guo W P, Liang W Y, Cheng C W, Wu W L, Wang Y T, Sun Q, Zu S, Misawa H, Cheng P J, Chang S W, Ahn H, Lin M, Gwo S 2020 Nano Lett. 20 2857 Google Scholar
[68]	Ollanik A J, Smith J A, Belue M J, Escarra M D 2018 ACS Photonics 5 1351 Google Scholar
[69]	Huang J, Ma H S, Chen D B, Yuan H, Zhang J P, Li Z K, Han J M, Wu J G, Yang J B 2021 Nanophotonics 10 1011 Google Scholar
[70]	Sanchis P, Villalba P, Cuesta F, Hakansson A, Griol A, Galan J V, Brimont A, Marti J 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 2760 Google Scholar
[71]	Yu Z J, Cui H R, Sun X K 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 3093 Google Scholar
[72]	Liu Z H, Liu X H, Xiao Z Y, Lu C C, Wang H Q, Wu Y, Hu X Y, Liu Y C, Zhang H Y, Zhang X D 2019 Optica 6 1367 Google Scholar
[73]	Kennedy J, Eberhart R 1995 ICNN95-International Conference on Neural Networks Perth, WA, Australia, November 27–December 1, 1995 p1942
[74]	Chen W W, Zhang B H, Wang P J, Dai S X, Liang W, Li H X, Fu Q, Li J, Li Y, Dai T G, Yu H, Yang J Y 2020 Opt. Express 28 30701 Google Scholar
[75]	Qin F, Liu B Q, Zhu L W, Lei J, Fang W, Hu D J, Zhu Y, Ma W D, Wang B W, Shi T, Cao Y Y, Guan B O, Qiu C W, Lu Y R, Li X P 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 32 Google Scholar
[76]	Chen W W, Lin J, Li H X, Wang P J, Dai S X, Liu Y X, Yao R K, Li J, Fu Q, Dai T G, Yang J Y 2022 Opt. Express 30 46236 Google Scholar
[77]	Seldowitz M A, Allebach J P, Sweeney D W 1987 Appl. Optics 26 2788 Google Scholar
[78]	Shen B, Wang P, Polson R, Menon R 2014 Opt. Express 22 27175 Google Scholar
[79]	Shen B, Wang P, Polson R, Menon R 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 378 Google Scholar
[80]	Wen X, Xu K, Song Q H 2016 Photonics Res. 4 209 Google Scholar
[81]	Zhou F Y, Lu L L Z, Zhang M M, Chang W J, Li D Y, Deng L, Liu D M 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) San Jose, USA, May 14–19, 2017 p1
[82]	Cao Y, Li S T, Petzold L, Serban R 2003 SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24 1076 Google Scholar
[83]	Jameson A 2003 Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method (Brussels: Von Karman Institute
[84]	McNamara A, Treuille A, Popović Z 2004 ACM Transactions On Graphics (TOG) 3 449 Google Scholar
[85]	Pedersen C B W, Allinger P 2006 IUTAM Symposium on Topological Design Optimization of Structures, Machines and Materials, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2006 p229
[86]	Lalau-Keraly C M, Bhargava S, Miller O D, Yablonovitch E 2013 Opt. Express 21 21693 Google Scholar
[87]	Hughes T W, Minkov M, Williamson I A D, Fan S H 2018 ACS Photonics 5 4781 Google Scholar
[88]	Michaels A, Yablonovitch E 2018 Opt. Express 26 4766 Google Scholar
[89]	Dai Y H 2002 SIAM J. Optimiz. 13 693 Google Scholar
[90]	Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J 1986 Nature 323 533 Google Scholar
[91]	Sermanet P, Eigen D, Zhang X, Mathieu M, Fergus R, LeCun Y 2013 arXiv: 1312.6229 [cs.CV
[92]	Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J 2016 IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 38 142 Google Scholar
[93]	Ren S Q, He K M, Girshick R, Sun J 2017 IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 39 1137 Google Scholar
[94]	Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Las Vegas, USA, June 27–30, 2016 p779
[95]	汪宋, 费树岷 2019 工业控制计算机 32 103 Wang S, Fei S 2019 Industrial Control Computer 32 103
[96]	Lin T Y, Dollar P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S 2016 arXiv: 1612.03144 [cs.CV
[97]	Joseph R A F 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Honolulu, USA, July 21–26, 2017 p6517
[98]	Lin T Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K M, Dollar P 2020 IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 42 318 Google Scholar
[99]	Redmon J, Farhadi A 2018 arXiv: 1804.02767v1 [cs.CV
[100]	Tan M X, Pang R M, Le Q V 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Seattle, USA, June 13–19, 2020 p10778
[101]	Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y 2014 Statistics 3 1467 Google Scholar
[102]	Nguyen H Q, Nguyen T M, Vu H H, Nguyen V V, Nguyen P T, Dao T N M, Tran K H, Dinh K Q 2019 6th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS) Hanoi, Vietnam, December 12–13, 2019 p240
[103]	Wu Y H, Schuster M, Chen Z F, Le Q V, Norouzi M 2016 arXiv: 1609.08144 [cs.CL
[104]	Cho K, van Merrienboer B, Bahdanau D, Bengio Y 2014 Statistics 2 1467 Google Scholar
[105]	Sennrich R, Haddow B, Birch A 2015 arXiv: 1511.06709 [cs.CL
[106]	Johnson M, Schuster M, Le Q V, Krikun M, Wu Y H, Chen Z F, Thorat N, Viégas F, Wattenberg M, Corrado G, Dean M H 2017 T. Assoc. Comput. Ling. 5 339 Google Scholar
[107]	Jean S, Cho K, Memisevic R, Bengio Y 2014 arXiv: 1412.2007 [cs.CL
[108]	Tu Z P, Lu Z D, Liu Y, Liu X H, Li H 2016 arXiv: 1601.04811 [cs.CL
[109]	Gao L, Mi H B, Zhu B Q, Feng D W, Li Y C, Peng Y X 2019 IEEE Access 7 105319 Google Scholar
[110]	Li Y C, Feng D W, Lu M L, Li D S 2019 In Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management: 12th International Conference, KSEM Athens, Greece, August 28–30, 2019 p37
[111]	Li Y C, Chen H X, Sun X G, Sun Z C, Li L, Cui L Z, Yu P S, Xu G D 2021 CIKM '21: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management Queensland Australia, November 1–5, 2021 p988
[112]	Li Y C, Chen H X, Li Y L, Li L, Yu P S, Xu G D 2023 IEEE T. Knowl. Data En. (early access) DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2023.3237741
[113]	Chen H X, Li Y C, Sun X G, Xu G D, Yin H Z 2021 WSDM '21: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining Virtual Event Israel, March 8–12, 2021 p1056
[114]	Hammond A M, Camacho R M 2019 Opt. Express 27 29620 Google Scholar
[115]	Tu X, Xie W S, Chen Z M, Ge M F, Huang T Y, Song C L, Fu H Y 2021 J. Lightwave Technol. 39 2790 Google Scholar
[116]	An S S, Zheng B W, Shalaginov M Y, Tang H, Li H, Zhou L, Dong Y X, Haerinia M, Agarwal A M, Rivero B C, Kang M, Richardson K A, Gu T, Hu J J, Fowler C, Zhang H L 2022 Adv. Opt. Mater. 10 2102113 Google Scholar
[117]	Liu D J, Tan Y X, Khoram E F, Yu Z F 2018 ACS Photonics 5 1365 Google Scholar
[118]	Ren Y M, Zhang L X, Wang W Q, Wang X Y, Lei Y F, Xue Y L, Sun X C, Zhang W F 2021 Photonics Res. 9 B247 Google Scholar
[119]	Zhao Z Y, You J, Zhang J, Du S Y, Tao Z L, Tang Y H, Jiang T 2022 Nanophotonics 11 4465 Google Scholar
[120]	Yeung C, Tsai R, Pham B, King B, Kawagoe Y, Ho D, Liang J, Knight M W, Raman A P 2021 Adv. Opt. Mater 9 2100548 Google Scholar
[121]	Meindl J D 2003 Comput. Sci. Eng. 5 20 Google Scholar
[122]	Mack C A. 2011 IEEE T. Semiconduct. M. 24 202 Google Scholar
[123]	Schaller R R 1997 IEEE Spectrum 34 52 Google Scholar
[124]	Zhang Y, Yang S Y, Lim A E J, Lo G Q, Galland C, Baehr-Jones T, Hochberg M 2013 Opt. Express 21 1310 Google Scholar
[125]	Kumari S, Prince S 2022 International Conference on Wireless Communications Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET) Chennai, India, March 24–26, 2022 p231
[126]	Chang W J, Ren X S, Ao Y Q, Lu L H, Cheng M F, Deng L, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2018 Opt. Express 26 24135 Google Scholar
[127]	Xu J F, Liu Y J, Guo X Y, Song Q H, Xu K 2022 Opt. Express 30 26266 Google Scholar
[128]	Zhu J B, Chao Q, Huang H Y, Zhao Y X, Li Y, Tao L, She X J, Liao H, Huang R, Zhu Z J, Liu X, Sheng Z, Gan F W 2021 Appl. Opt. 60 413 Google Scholar
[129]	Sheng J C, Liu Y J, Xu K 2019 The International Photonics and Optoelectronics Meeting Wuhan China, November 11–14, 2019 paper OW3D.6
[130]	Chang W J, Lu L L Z, Ren X S, Li D Y, Pan Z P, Cheng M F, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2018 Opt. Express 26 8162 Google Scholar
[131]	Ding Y H, Xu J, Da R F, Huang B, Ou H Y, Peucheret C 2013 Opt. Express 21 10376 Google Scholar
[132]	Xie H C, Liu Y J, Wang S, Wang Y J, Yao Y, Song Q H, Du J B, He Z Y, Xu K 2020 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 32 166 Google Scholar
[133]	Zhou H L, Wang Y L, Gao X Y, Gao D S, Dong J J, Huang D M, Li F, Alexander W P K, Zhang X L 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2100521 Google Scholar
[134]	Wang J, He S L, Dai D X 2014 Laser Photonics Rev. 8 L18 Google Scholar
[135]	Li C L, Liu D J, Dai D X 2019 Nanophotonics 8 227 Google Scholar
[136]	Jiang X H, Wu H, Dai D X 2018 Opt. Express 26 17680 Google Scholar
[137]	Chang W J, Lu L L Z, Liu D M, Zhang M M 2018 Optical Fiber Communication (OFC) Conference San Diego, USA, March 11–15, 2018 p1
[138]	Gabrielli L H, Liu D, Johnson S G, Lipson M 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 1217 Google Scholar
[139]	Liu Y J, Xu K, Wang S, Shen W H, Xie H C, Wang Y J, Xiao S M, Yao Y, Du J B, He Z Y, Song Q H 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3263 Google Scholar
[140]	Wu H, Tan Y, Dai D X 2017 Opt. Express 25 6069 Google Scholar
[141]	Huang J, Yang J B, Chen D B, He X, Han Y X, Zhang J J, Zhang Z J 2018 Photonics Res. 6 574 Google Scholar
[142]	Piggott A Y, Petykiewicz J, Su L, Vučković J 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 1786 Google Scholar
[143]	Yu L H, Yin Y L, Shi Y C, Dai D X, He S L 2016 J. Operat. Theo. 3 159 Google Scholar
[144]	Gentry C M, Zeng X, Popović M A 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5689 Google Scholar
[145]	Wuttig M, Bhaskaran H, Taubner T 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 465 Google Scholar
[146]	Sherwood-Droz N, Wang H, Chen L, Lee B G, Lipson M 2008 Opt. Express 16 15915 Google Scholar
[147]	Ono M, Hata M, Tsunekawa M, Nozaki K, Sumikura H, Chiba H, Notomi M 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 37 Google Scholar
[148]	Gong Z L, Yang F Y, Wang L T, Chen R, Wu J Q, Grigoropoulos C P, Yao J 2021 J. Appl. Phys. 129 30902 Google Scholar
[149]	Fang Z R, Chen R, Tara V, Majumdar A 2023 Sci. Bull. 68 783 Google Scholar
[150]	Xu P P, Zheng J J, Doylend J K. , Majumdar A 2019 ACS Photonics 6 553 Google Scholar
[151]	Wang Q, Rogers E T F, Gholipour B, Wang C M, Yuan G H, Teng J H, Zheludev N I 2016 Nat. Photonics 10 60 Google Scholar
[152]	Zhang Y F, Fowler C, Liang J H, Azhar B, Shalaginov M Y, Deckoff-Jones S, An S S, Chou J B, Roberts C M, Liberman V, Kang M, Ríos C, Richardson K A, Rivero-Baleine C, Gu T, Zhang H L, Hu J J 2021 Nat. Nanotechnol. 16 661 Google Scholar
[153]	Shportko K, Kremers S, Woda M, Lencer D, Robertson J, Wuttig M 2008 Nat. Mater. 7 653 Google Scholar
[154]	Kim S, Burr G W, Nam W K Sung W 2019 MRS Bull. 44 710 Google Scholar
[155]	Loke D, Lee T H, Wang W J, Zhao R, Shi L P, Yeo Y C, Chong T C, Elliott S R 2012 Science 336 1566 Google Scholar
[156]	Orava J, Greer A L, Gholipour B, Hewak D W, Smith C E 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 279 Google Scholar
[157]	Li W F, Cao X Y, Song S N, Wu L S, Wang R B, Jin Y, Song Z T, Wu A M 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 16 2100717 Google Scholar
[158]	Stegmaier M, Iacute C R, Bhaskaran H, Wright C D, Pernice W H P 2016 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1600346 Google Scholar
[159]	Feldmann J, Youngblood N, Wright C D, Bhaskaran H, Pernice W H P 2019 Nature 569 208 Google Scholar
[160]	Feldmann J, Youngblood N, Karpov M, Gehring H, Li X, Stappers M, Le Gallo M, Fu X, Lukashchuk A, Raja A. S, Liu J, Wright C D, Sebastian A, Kippenberg T J, Pernice W H P, Bhaskaran H 2021 Nature 589 52 Google Scholar
[161]	Pernice W H P, Bhaskaran H 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 171101 Google Scholar
[162]	Raoux S, Xiong F, Wuttig M, Pop E 2014 MRS Bull. 39 703 Google Scholar
[163]	Zhang Y F, Chou J B, Li J Y, Li H S, Du Q Y, Yadav A, Zhou Si, Shalaginov M Y, Fang Z R, Zhong H K, Roberts C, Robinson P, Bohlin B, Ríos C, Lin H T, Kang M, Gu T, Warner J, Liberman V, Richardson K, Hu J J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 4279 Google Scholar
[164]	Fang Z R, Zheng J J, Saxena A, Whitehead J, Chen Y Y, Majumdar A 2021 Adv. Opt. Mater. 9 2002049 Google Scholar
[165]	Delaney M, Zeimpekis I, Lawson D, Hewak D W, Muskens O L 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 2002447 Google Scholar
[166]	Yang S, Shamim A, Vaseem M 2019 Adv. Mater. Technol. 4 11 Google Scholar
[167]	Wang N N, Li T T, Sun B S, Wang Z, Zhou L J, Gu T Y 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 4088 Google Scholar
[168]	Chen H X, Jia H, Wang T, Tian Y H, Yang J H 2020 J. Lightwave Technol. 38 1874 Google Scholar
[169]	Ma H S, Yang J B, Huang J, Zhang Z J, Zhang K W 2021 Results Phys. 26 104384 Google Scholar
[170]	Delaney M, Zeimpekis I, Du H, Yan X Z, Banakar M, Thomson D J, Hewak D W, Muskens O L 2021 Sci. Adv. 7
[171]	Yuan H, Wu J G, Zhang J P, Pu X, Zhang Z F, Yu Y, Yang J B 2022 Nanomaterials 12 669 Google Scholar
[172]	Piggott A Y, Lu J, Babinec T M, Lagoudakis K G, Petykiewicz J, Vučković J 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 7210 Google Scholar
[173]	Ma H S, Luo M Y, He J, Du T, Zhang Z J, Jiang X P, He X, Fang L, Yang J B 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 7869 Google Scholar
[174]	Ma H S, Du T, Zhang Z J, Jiang X P, Fang L, Yang J B 2023 Opt. Commun. 526 128912 Google Scholar
[175]	Dai D X, Wu H 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 2346 Google Scholar
[176]	Huang J, Yang J B, Chen D B, Bai W, Han J M, Zhang Z J, Zhang J J, He X, Han Y X, Liang L M 2020 Nanophotonics 9 159 Google Scholar
[177]	Ruan X K, Li H, Chu T 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 7142 Google Scholar
[178]	Li C L, Zhang M, Xu H N, Tan Y, Shi Y C, Dai D X 2021 PhotoniX 2 1991 Google Scholar
[179]	Dai D X, Li C L, Wang S P, Wu H, Shi Y C, Wu Z H, Gao S M, Dai T G, Yu H, Tsang H K 2018 Laser Photonics Rev. 12 1700109 Google Scholar
[180]	Shen W W, Chen K N 2017 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 56 Google Scholar
[181]	Moreira R, Barton J, Belt M, Huffman T, Blumenthal D 2013 Advanced Photonics CongressIntegrated Photonics Research, Silicon and Nanophotonics Rio Grande, USA, July 14–17, 2013 paper IT2A.4
[182]	Sodagar M, Pourabolghasem R, Eftekhar A A, Adibi A 2014 Opt. Express 22 16767 Google Scholar
[183]	Zheng X, Cunningham J E, Shubin I, Simons J, Asghari M, Feng D, Lei H, Zheng D, Liang H, Kung C C, Luff J, Sze T, Cohen D, Krishnamoorthy A V 2008 Opt. Express 16 15052 Google Scholar
[184]	Yu Z X, Qiu J F, Dong Z L, Zheng L, Guo H X, Wu J 2018 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP) Hangzhou, China, October 26–29, 2018 p1

[1]	杨旭, 李静, 毛宇, 陶可爱, 孙宽, 陈珊珊, 周永利, 郑玉杰. 基于六水氯化钙的单相变材料热二极管的实验研究. 物理学报, 2024, 73(5): 058301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231686
[2]	张赞, 黄北举, 陈弘达. 基于可重构硅光滤波器的计算重建片上光谱仪. 物理学报, 2024, 73(14): 140701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240224
[3]	熊霄, 曹启韬, 肖云峰. 铌酸锂集成光子器件的发展与机遇. 物理学报, 2023, 72(23): 234201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231295
[4]	周昆, 马豪悦, 孙希贤, 吴小虎. 基于VO₂和石墨烯实现hBN声子极化激元和自发发射率的主动调谐. 物理学报, 2023, 72(7): 074201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222167
[5]	朱祥宁, 冯黛丽, 冯妍卉, 林林, 张欣欣. 木基生物质碳化骨架负载聚乙二醇相变材料及表面修饰对蓄传热性能的强化. 物理学报, 2023, 72(8): 088801. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222466
[6]	金嘉升, 马成举, 张垚, 张跃斌, 鲍士仟, 李咪, 李东明, 刘洺, 刘芊震, 张贻歆. 基于相变材料的慢光和吸收可切换多功能太赫兹超材料. 物理学报, 2023, 72(8): 084202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222336
[7]	张伊祎, 韦雪玲, 农洁, 马汉斯, 叶子阳, 徐文杰, 张振荣, 杨俊波. 基于直接二进制搜索算法设计的超紧凑In₂Se₃可调控功率分束器. 物理学报, 2023, 72(15): 154207. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230459
[8]	冯妍卉, 冯黛丽, 褚福强, 邱琳, 孙方远, 林林, 张欣欣. 纳米组装相变储热材料的热设计前沿. 物理学报, 2022, 71(1): 016501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211776
[9]	李科, 董明利, 袁配, 鹿利单, 孙广开, 祝连庆. 基于阵列波导光栅的光纤布拉格光栅解调技术综述. 物理学报, 2022, 71(9): 094207. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212063
[10]	龙洁, 李九生. 相变材料与超表面复合结构太赫兹移相器. 物理学报, 2021, 70(7): 074201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201495
[11]	李庚霖, 贾曰辰, 陈峰. 绝缘体上铌酸锂薄膜片上光子学器件的研究进展. 物理学报, 2020, 69(15): 157801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200302
[12]	严巍, 王纪永, 曲俞睿, 李强, 仇旻. 基于相变材料超表面的光学调控. 物理学报, 2020, 69(15): 154202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200453
[13]	蔡迪, 李静, 焦乃勋. 纳米石墨烯片-正十八烷复合相变材料制备及热物性研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(10): 100502. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182068
[14]	肖廷辉, 于洋, 李志远. 石墨烯-硅基混合光子集成电路. 物理学报, 2017, 66(21): 217802. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.217802
[15]	田曼曼, 王国祥, 沈祥, 陈益敏, 徐铁峰, 戴世勋, 聂秋华. ZnSb掺杂的Ge2Sb2Te5薄膜的相变性能研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(17): 176802. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.176802
[16]	周培基, 李智勇, 俞育德, 余金中. 硅基光子集成研究进展. 物理学报, 2014, 63(10): 104218. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.104218
[17]	王强, 周海京, 杨春, 李彪, 何晓阳. 过模波导器件的迭代设计方法. 物理学报, 2013, 62(11): 115204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.115204
[18]	查晓明, 张扬, 孙建军, 樊友平. 基于微分同调和混沌分析的集成三相变流电路的降阶方法. 物理学报, 2012, 61(2): 020505. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.020505
[19]	舒斌, 张鹤鸣, 朱国良, 樊敏, 宣荣喜. 基于智能剥离技术的SOI材料制备. 物理学报, 2007, 56(3): 1668-1673. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1668
[20]	沈强, 张联盟, 王传彬, 华劲松, 谭华, 经福谦. 梯度飞片材料的波阻抗分布设计与优化. 物理学报, 2003, 52(7): 1663-1667. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1663

计量

文章访问数: 7675
PDF下载量: 278
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

片上光互连器件的智能化设计研究进展