Advance in interface and characterizations of sulfide solid electrolyte materials

Zhang Qiao-Bao; Gong Zheng-Liang; Yang Yong

doi:10.7498/aps.69.20201581

Abstract

The development of high-energy density and high-safety all-solid-state lithium battery (ASSLB) technology has important practical significance for promoting the upgrading of lithium battery technology and the strengthening of technological development in this field. The solid electrolyte is a core component of the ASSLB. The sulfide solid electrolyte is regarded as one of the most promising solid electrolyte candidates for practical application in ASSLBs due to its high ionic conductivity, better mechanical ductility, and good interface contact with the electrode. However, its practical application is severely hampered by the issues of poor air stability and interface problems, including interface side reactions, lithium dendritic growth, and interface mechanical failure. In this review, we first summarize the research methods and degradation mechanisms of the air stability of sulfide solid electrolytes, and the strategies and methods to improve their air stability. Then, the electrochemical stability, interface compatibility and related interfacial modification strategies for sulfide electrolyte/electrode interface are summarized and discussed. Further, the research progress of in-situ characterization technologies for sulfide solid electrolyte/electrode interfaces in recent years is analyzed and summarized. Finally, an outlook on the future research and development of stable interfaces in sulfide solid electrolyte based ASSLBs is highlighted.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
2.
College of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Corresponding author: Gong Zheng-Liang, zlgong@xmu.edu.cn ; Yang Yong, yyang@xmu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52072323, 21935009, 21875196) and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB0905400)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Zheng Z, Wu H H, Liu H, Zhang Q, He X, Yu S, Petrova V, Feng J, Kostecki R, Liu P, Peng D L, Liu M, Wang M S 2020 ACS Nano 14 9545 Google Scholar
[2]	An W, Gao B, Mei S, Xiang B, Fu J, Wang L, Zhang Q, Chu P K, Huo K 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1447 Google Scholar
[3]	Zheng Z, Li P, Huang J, Liu H, Zao Y, Hu Z, Zhang L, Chen H, Wang M S, Peng D L, Zhang Q 2020 J. Energy Chem. 41 126 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhang Q, Chen H, Luo L, Zhao B, Luo H, Han X, Wang J, Wang C, Yang Y, Zhu T, Liu M 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 669 Google Scholar
[5]	Zhong S Y, Shi J, Luo W W, Lei X L 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 078201 Google Scholar
[6]	Wang Y, Liu B N, Zhou G, Nie K H, Zhang J N, Yu X Q, Li H 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 068202 Google Scholar
[7]	Wang H, Lan X, Huang Y, Jiang X 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 098201 Google Scholar
[8]	Jiang L W, Lu Y X, Wang Y S, Liu L L, Qi X G, Zhao C L, Chen L Q, Hu Y S 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 048801 Google Scholar
[9]	Chen R, Li Q, Yu X, Chen L, Li H 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 6820 Google Scholar
[10]	Banerjee A, Wang X, Fang C, Wu E A, Meng Y S 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 6878 Google Scholar
[11]	Wang C, Fu K, Kammampata S P, McOwen D W, Samson A J, Zhang L, Hitz G T, Nolan A M, Wachsman E D, Mo Y, Thangadurai V, Hu L 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 4257 Google Scholar
[12]	Xiao Y, Wang Y, Bo S H, Kim J C, Miara L J, Ceder G 2020 Nat. Rev. Mater. 5 105 Google Scholar
[13]	Liu L, Xu J, Wang S, Wu F, Li H, Chen L 2019 eTransportation 1 100010 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhao Q, Stalin S, Zhao C Z, Archer L A 2020 Nat. Rev. Mater. 5 229 Google Scholar
[15]	Xu J, Liu L, Yao N, Wu F, Li H, Chen L 2019 Mater. Today Nano 8 100048 Google Scholar
[16]	Wang H, An H, Shan H, Zhao L, Wang J 2020 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 36 2007070 Google Scholar
[17]	Jin F, Li J, Hu C, Dong H, Chen P, Shen Y, Chen L 2019 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 35 1399 Google Scholar
[18]	Minami K, Mizuno F, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2007 Solid State Ionics 178 837 Google Scholar
[19]	Tachez M, Malugani J P, Mercier R, Robert G 1984 Solid State Ionics 14 181 Google Scholar
[20]	Kamaya N, Homma K, Yamakawa Y, Hirayama M, Kanno R, Yonemura M, Kamiyama T, Kato Y, Hama S, Kawamoto K, Mitsui A 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 682 Google Scholar
[21]	Kanno R, Murayama M 2001 J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 A742 Google Scholar
[22]	Kato Y, Hori S, Saito T, Suzuki K, Hirayama M, Mitsui A, Yonemura M, Iba H, Kanno R 2016 Nat. Energy 1 16030 Google Scholar
[23]	Deiseroth H J, Kong S T, Eckert H, Vannahme J, Reiner C, Zaiss T, Schlosser M 2008 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 755 Google Scholar
[24]	Wenzel S, Randau S, Leichtweiß T, Weber D A, Sann J, Zeier W G, Janek J 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 2400 Google Scholar
[25]	Culver S P, Koerver R, Zeier W G, Janek J 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1900626 Google Scholar
[26]	Lian P J, Zhao B S, Zhang L Q, Xu N, Wu M T, Gao X P 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A 7 20540 Google Scholar
[27]	Yang W, Tufail M K, Zhou L, Lü L, Chen R, Yang L 2020 Sci. Sin. Chim. 50 1031 Google Scholar
[28]	Muramatsu H, Hayashi A, Ohtomo T, Hama S, Tatsumisago M 2011 Solid State Ionics 182 116 Google Scholar
[29]	Kim J S, Jeon M, Kim S, Lee J H, Kim B K, Kim H 2020 Solid State Ionics 346 115225 Google Scholar
[30]	Sahu G, Lin Z, Li J, Liu Z, Dudney N, Liang C 2014 Energy Environ. Sci. 7 1053 Google Scholar
[31]	Liang J, Chen N, Li X, Li X, Adair K R, Li J, Wang C, Yu C, Norouzi Banis M, Zhang L, Zhao S, Lu S, Huang H, Li R, Huang Y, Sun X 2020 Chem. Mater. 32 2664 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhu Y, Mo Y 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 17472 Google Scholar
[33]	Ohtomo T, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M, Kawamoto K 2013 J. Solid State Electrochem. 17 2551 Google Scholar
[34]	Liu G, Xie D, Wang X, Yao X, Chen S, Xiao R, Li H, Xu X 2019 Energy Storage Mater. 17 266 Google Scholar
[35]	Hayashi A, Muramatsu H, Ohtomo T, Hama S, Tatsumisago M 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 6320 Google Scholar
[36]	Hayashi A, Muramatsu H, Ohtomo T, Hama S, Tatsumisago M 2014 J Alloys Compd. 591 247 Google Scholar
[37]	Brant J A, Massi D M, Holzwarth N A W, MacNeil J H, Douvalis A P, Bakas T, Martin S W, Gross M D, Aitken J A 2014 Chem. Mater. 27 189 Google Scholar
[38]	Park K H, Oh D Y, Choi Y E, Nam Y J, Han L, Kim J Y, Xin H, Lin F, Oh S M, Jung Y S 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 1874 Google Scholar
[39]	Kimura T, Kato A, Hotehama C, Sakuda A, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2019 Solid State Ionics 333 45 Google Scholar
[40]	Zhang Z, Zhang J, Sun Y, Jia H, Peng L, Zhang Y, Xie J 2020 J. Energy Chem. 41 171 Google Scholar
[41]	Zhao F, Liang J, Yu C, Sun Q, Li X, Adair K, Wang C, Zhao Y, Zhang S, Li W, Deng S, Li R, Huang Y, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhao S, Lu S, Sun X 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903422 Google Scholar
[42]	Wang Y, Lü X, Zheng C, Liu X, Chen Z, Yang W, Lin J, Huang F 2019 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 7673 Google Scholar
[43]	Tan D H S, Banerjee A, Deng Z, Wu E A, Nguyen H, Doux J M, Wang X, Cheng J H, Ong S P, Meng Y S, Chen Z 2019 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2 6542 Google Scholar
[44]	Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 23685 Google Scholar
[45]	Han F, Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y, Wang C 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1501590 Google Scholar
[46]	Sang L, Haasch R T, Gewirth A A, Nuzzo R G 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 3029 Google Scholar
[47]	Richards W D, Miara L J, Wang Y, Kim J C, Ceder G 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 266 Google Scholar
[48]	Wenzel S, Leichtweiss T, Krüger D, Sann J, Janek J 2015 Solid State Ionics 278 98 Google Scholar
[49]	Woo J H, Trevey J E, Cavanagh A S, Choi Y S, Kim S C, George S M, Oh K H, Lee S H 2012 J. Electrochem. Soc. 159 A1120 Google Scholar
[50]	Takada K, Ohta N, Zhang L, Xu X, Hang B T, Ohnishi T, Osada M, Sasaki T 2012 Solid State Ionics 225 594 Google Scholar
[51]	Jung S K, Gwon H, Lee S S, Kim H, Lee J C, Chung J G, Park S Y, Aihara Y, Im D 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A 7 22967 Google Scholar
[52]	Koerver R, Aygün I, Leichtweiß T, Dietrich C, Zhang W, Binder J O, Hartmann P, Zeier W G, Janek J 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 5574 Google Scholar
[53]	Zheng B Z, Liu X S, Zhu J P, Zhao J, Zhong G M, Xiang Y X, Wang H C, Zhao W M, Umeshbabu E, Wu Q H, Huang J Y, Yang Y 2020 Nano Energy 67 104252 Google Scholar
[54]	Wu X, Villevieille C, Novák P, El Kazzi M 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 11123 Google Scholar
[55]	Ohta N, Takada K, Sakaguchi I, Zhang L, Ma R, Fukuda K, Osada M, Sasaki T 2007 Electrochem. Commun. 9 1486 Google Scholar
[56]	Ohta N, Takada K, Zhang L, Ma R, Osada M, Sasaki T 2006 Adv. Mater. 18 2226 Google Scholar
[57]	Fan X, Ji X, Han F, Yue J, Chen J, Chen L, Deng T, Jiang J, Wang C 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaau9245 Google Scholar
[58]	Zheng B Z, Zhu J P, Wang H C, Feng M, Umeshbabu E, Li Y X, Wu Q H, Yang Y 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 25473 Google Scholar
[59]	Zhang Q, Cao D, Ma Y, Natan A, Aurora P, Zhu H 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1901131 Google Scholar
[60]	Culver S P, Koerver R, Zeier W G, Janek J 2019 Advanced Energy Materials 9 1900626
[61]	Wu F, Fitzhugh W, Ye L, Ning J, Li X 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4037 Google Scholar
[62]	Fitzhugh W, Wu F, Ye L, Su H, Li X 2019 Small 15 1901470 Google Scholar
[63]	Li X, Sun Q, Wang Z, Song D, Zhang H, Shi X, Li C, Zhang L, Zhu L 2020 J. Power Sources 456 227997 Google Scholar
[64]	Han F, Westover A S, Yue J, Fan X, Wang F, Chi M, Leonard D N, Dudney N, Wang H, Wang C 2019 Nat. Energy 4 187 Google Scholar
[65]	Nagao M, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M, Kanetsuku T, Tsuda T, Kuwabata S 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 18600 Google Scholar
[66]	Ma J, Chen B, Wang L, Cui G 2018 J. Power Sources 392 94 Google Scholar
[67]	Gao Y, Wang D, Li Y C, Yu Z, Mallouk T E, Wang D 2018 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 13608 Google Scholar
[68]	Zhang Z, Chen S, Yang J, Wang J, Yao L, Yao X, Cui P, Xu X 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 2556 Google Scholar
[69]	Garcia-Mendez R, Mizuno F, Zhang R, Arthur T S, Sakamoto J 2017 Electrochim. Acta 237 144 Google Scholar
[70]	Porz L, Swamy T, Sheldon B W, Rettenwander D, Frömling T, Thaman H L, Berendts S, Uecker R, Carter W C, Chiang Y M 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1701003 Google Scholar
[71]	Han F, Yue J, Zhu X, Wang C 2018 Adv. Energy Mater. 8 1703644 Google Scholar
[72]	Schlenker R, Stepien D, Koch P, Hupfer T, Indris S, Roling B, Miss V, Fuchs A, Wilhelmi M, Ehrenberg H 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 20012 Google Scholar
[73]	Kasemchainan J, Zekoll S, Jolly D S, Ning Z Y, Hartley G O, Marrow J, Bruce P G 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1105 Google Scholar
[74]	Ong S P, Mo Y, Richards W D, Miara L, Lee H S, Ceder G 2013 Energy Environ. Sci. 6 148 Google Scholar
[75]	Wenzel S, Weber D A, Leichtweiss T, Busche M R, Sann J, Janek J 2016 Solid State Ionics 286 24 Google Scholar
[76]	Wenzel S, Sedlmaier S J, Dietrich C, Zeier W G, Janek J 2018 Solid State Ionics 318 102 Google Scholar
[77]	Yao X, Huang N, Han F, Zhang Q, Wan H, Mwizerwa J P, Wang C, Xu X 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1602923 Google Scholar
[78]	Chen T, Zhang L, Zhang Z X, Li P, Wang H Q, Yu C, Yan X L, Wang L M, Xu B 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 40808 Google Scholar
[79]	Tao Y, Chen S, Liu D, Peng G, Yao X, Xu X 2015 J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 A96 Google Scholar
[80]	Zhao F P, Sun Q, Yu C, Zhang S M, Adair K, Wang S Z, Liu Y L, Zhao Y, Liang J W, Wang C H, Li X N, Li X, Xia W, Li R Y, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhao S Q, Lu S G, Sun X L 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 1035 Google Scholar
[81]	Xu R, Han F, Ji X, Fan X, Tu J, Wang C 2018 Nano Energy 53 958 Google Scholar
[82]	Liang J, Li X, Zhao Y, Goncharova L V, Li W, Adair K R, Banis M N, Hu Y, Sham T K, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhao S, Lu S, Li R, Sun X 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1902125 Google Scholar
[83]	Wang C, Zhao Y, Sun Q, Li X, Liu Y, Liang J, Li X, Lin X, Li R, Adair K R, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S, Sun X 2018 Nano Energy 53 168 Google Scholar
[84]	Davis A L, Garcia-Mendez R, Wood K N, Kazyak E, Chen K H, Teeter G, Sakamoto J, Dasgupta N P 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 6291 Google Scholar
[85]	Sang L, Bassett K L, Castro F C, Young M J, Chen L, Haasch R T, Elam J W, Dravid V P, Nuzzo R G, Gewirth A A 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 8747 Google Scholar
[86]	LePage W S, Chen Y, Kazyak E, Chen K H, Sanchez A J, Poli A, Arruda E M, Thouless M D, Dasgupta N P 2019 J. Electrochem. Soc. 166 A89 Google Scholar
[87]	Wang C, Adair K R, Liang J, Li X, Sun Y, Li X, Wang J, Sun Q, Zhao F, Lin X, Li R, Huang H, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S, Sun X 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1900392 Google Scholar
[88]	Lee Y G, Fujiki S, Jung C, Suzuki N, Yashiro N, Omoda R, Ko D S, Shiratsuchi T, Sugimoto T, Ryu S, Ku J H, Watanabe T, Park Y, Aihara Y, Im D, Han I T 2020 Nat. Energy 5 299 Google Scholar
[89]	Haruyama J, Sodeyama K, Han L, Takada K, Tateyama Y 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 4248 Google Scholar
[90]	Takada K 2013 Langmuir 29 7538 Google Scholar
[91]	Chen S, Xie D, Liu G, Mwizerwa J P, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Xu X, Yao X 2018 Energy Storage Mater. 14 58 Google Scholar
[92]	Otoyama M, Ito Y, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2016 J. Power Sources 302 419 Google Scholar
[93]	Zhang J, Zheng C, Li L, Xia Y, Huang H, Gan Y, Liang C, He X, Tao X, Zhang W 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903311 Google Scholar
[94]	Auvergniot J, Cassel A, Ledeuil J B, Viallet V, Seznec V, Dedryvère R 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 3883 Google Scholar
[95]	Zhang W, Richter F H, Culver S P, Leichtweiss T, Lozano J G, Dietrich C, Bruce P G, Zeier W G, Janek J 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 22226 Google Scholar
[96]	Yang J, Huang B, Yin J, Yao X, Peng G, Zhou J, Xu X 2016 J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 A1530 Google Scholar
[97]	Park K H, Oh D Y, Choi Y E, Nam Y J, Han L, Kim J Y, Xin H, Lin F, Oh S M, Jung Y S 2016 Advanced Materials 28 1874
[98]	Park K H, Bai Q, Kim D H, Oh D Y, Zhu Y, Mo Y, Jung Y S 2018 Adv. Energy Mater. 8 1800035 Google Scholar
[99]	Li X, Jin L, Song D, Zhang H, Shi X, Wang Z, Zhang L, Zhu L 2020 J. Energy Chem. 40 39 Google Scholar
[100]	Kitaura H, Hayashi A, Tadanaga K, Tatsumisago M 2011 Solid State Ionics 192 304 Google Scholar
[101]	Takada K, Ohta N, Zhang L, Fukuda K, Sakaguchi I, Ma R, Osada M, Sasaki T 2008 Solid State Ionics 179 1333 Google Scholar
[102]	Sakuda A, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2010 Chem. Mater. 22 949 Google Scholar
[103]	Sakuda A, Kitaura H, Hayashi A, Tadanaga K, Tatsumisago M 2008 Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 11 A1 Google Scholar
[104]	Jin Y, Li N, Chen C H, Wei S Q 2006 Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 9 A273 Google Scholar
[105]	Machida N, Kashiwagi J, Naito M, Shigematsu T 2012 Solid State Ionics 225 354 Google Scholar
[106]	Woo J H, Travis J J, George S M, Lee S H 2014 J. Electrochem. Soc. 162 A344 Google Scholar
[107]	Jung S H, Oh K, Nam Y J, Oh D Y, Bruener P, Kang K, Jung Y S 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 8190 Google Scholar
[108]	Zhang N, Ding F, Yu S, Zhu K, Li H, Zhang W, Liu X, Xu Q 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 27897 Google Scholar
[109]	Wang C, Li X, Zhao Y, Banis M N, Liang J, Li X, Sun Y, Adair K R, Sun Q, Liu Y, Zhao F, Deng S, Lin X, Li R, Hu Y, Sham T K, Huang H, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S, Sun X 2019 Small Methods 3 1900261 Google Scholar
[110]	Banerjee A, Tang H, Wang X, Cheng J H, Nguyen H, Zhang M, Tan D H S, Wynn T A, Wu E A, Doux J M, Wu T, Ma L, Sterbinsky G E, D’Souza M S, Ong S P, Meng Y S 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 43138 Google Scholar
[111]	Jung S H, Kim U H, Kim J H, Jun S, Yoon C S, Jung Y S, Sun Y K 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903360 Google Scholar
[112]	Deng S, Li X, Ren Z, Li W, Luo J, Liang J, Liang J, Banis M N, Li M, Zhao Y, Li X, Wang C, Sun Y, Sun Q, Li R, Hu Y, Huang H, Zhang L, Lu S, Luo J, Sun X 2020 Energy Storage Mater. 27 117 Google Scholar
[113]	Wang C, Liang J, Hwang S, Li X, Zhao Y, Adair K, Zhao C, Li X, Deng S, Lin X, Yang X, Li R, Huang H, Zhang L, Lu S, Su D, Sun X 2020 Nano Energy 72 104686 Google Scholar
[114]	Li X, Liang M, Sheng J, Song D, Zhang H, Shi X, Zhang L 2019 Energy Storage Mater. 18 100 Google Scholar
[115]	Lu J, Wu T, Amine K 2017 Nat. Energy 2 17011 Google Scholar
[116]	Yuan Y, Amine K, Lu J, Shahbazian-Yassar R 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15806 Google Scholar
[117]	Xiang Y, Li X, Cheng Y, Sun X, Yang Y 2020 Mater. Today 36 139 Google Scholar
[118]	Boebinger M G, Lewis J A, Sandoval S E, McDowell M T 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 335 Google Scholar
[119]	Nomura Y, Yamamoto K, Hirayama T, Igaki E, Saitoh K 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 2098 Google Scholar
[120]	Wang C, Li X, Zhao Y, Banis M N, Liang J, Li X, Sun Y, Adair K R, Sun Q, Liu Y, Zhao F, Deng S, Lin X, Li R, Hu Y, Sham T K, Huang H, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S, Sun X 2019 Small Method. 3 1900261
[121]	Li X, Ren Z, Norouzi Banis M, Deng S, Zhao Y, Sun Q, Wang C, Yang X, Li W, Liang J, Li X, Sun Y, Adair K, Li R, Hu Y, Sham T K, Huang H, Zhang L, Lu S, Luo J, Sun X 2019 ACS Energy Lett. 4 2480 Google Scholar
[122]	Yamamoto K, Iriyama Y, Hirayama T 2017 Microscopy 66 50 Google Scholar
[123]	Masuda H, Ishida N, Ogata Y, Ito D, Fujita D 2017 Nanoscale 9 893 Google Scholar
[124]	Koerver R, Walther F, Aygün I, Sann J, Dietrich C, Zeier W G, Janek J 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 22750 Google Scholar
[125]	Chien P H, Feng X, Tang M, Rosenberg J T, O’Neill S, Zheng J, Grant S C, Hu Y Y 2018 J. Phys.Chem. Lett. 9 1990 Google Scholar
[126]	Wang C, Gong Y, Dai J, Zhang L, Xie H, Pastel G, Liu B, Wachsman E, Wang H, Hu L 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 14257 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 基于硫化物电解质的固态锂电池界面面临的主要挑战^[24-26]

Figure 1. Illustration of the interfacial issues in all-solid-state lithium batteries with sulfide solid electrolytes^[24-26].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 (a) 不同Li₂S含量的Li₂S-P₂S₅玻璃硫化物电解质生成的H₂S量; (b), (c) 67Li₂S·33P₂S₅ 和Li₂S在空气中暴露前和暴露4 min, 90 min以及一天后的拉曼光谱; (d) 75Li₂S·25P₂S₅玻璃和 (e) 玻璃陶瓷硫化物电解质在空气中暴露前和暴露一天后的拉曼光谱; (f) 67Li₂S·33P₂S₅和 (g) Li₂S玻璃暴露于空气中的结构变化; (h) 75Li₂S·25P₂S₅玻璃陶瓷硫化物电解质暴露于空气中电导率随着暴露时间变化图^[28]

Figure 2. (a) Amounts of H₂S generated from pelletized Li₂S–P₂S₅ glasses with different Li₂S contents; (b) Raman spectra of the 67Li₂S·33P₂S₅ glass before exposure to the atmosphere and after exposure for 4 min, 90 min and 1 day; (c) Raman spectra of the Li₂S crystal before exposure to the atmosphere and after exposure for 4 min, 90 min and 1 day; Raman spectra of the 75Li₂S·25P₂S₅ glass and glass-ceramic (d) before exposure to the atmosphere and, (e) after exposure for 1 day; structural changes of the (f) 67Li₂S·33P₂S₅ glass and (g) Li₂S crystal in air; (h) conductivity of the pelletized 75Li₂S·25P₂S₅ glass-ceramic as a function of exposure time to air at room temperature^[28].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 (a) 基于理论模拟预测构建的由 (100), (010), (001), (111), (110) 和(101)六个晶面组成的平衡晶体形状的β-Li₃PS₄模型, {100}, {110} 和 {111} 平面分别由红色、黄色和蓝色表示; (b) 平衡晶体形状中六个低指数面的原子结构图, 灰色和蓝色的四面体分别表示锂离子和${\rm{PS}}_4^{3-}$阴离子, 虚线代表表面层^[29]; (c) 不同水和硫化氢化学势下的优势相图; (d) 硫化物的水解反应能量, 包括46个二元金属硫化物 (灰色圆圈), 52个三元锂金属硫化物 (绿色三角形) 和65个钠金属硫化物 (橙色三角形), 作为金属阳离子的函数, 反应能量越负说明耐潮湿稳定性越差 (对湿气敏感), 而正反应能量越高, 表明耐潮湿稳定性越好(水分稳定). 水平虚线对应于水解硫化锂 (绿色)和硫化钠 (橙色) 的反应能; (e) 52种锂三元硫化物阳离子选择依据图, 耐潮湿定性 (水解反应能, y轴)与还原稳定性 (还原与碱金属的反应能, x轴)^[32]

Figure 3. (a) The predicted ECS of the β-Li₃PS₄ structure. The red, yellow, and blue colors represent the {100}, {110}, and {111} planes; (b) atomic images of six low indexed surfaces in ECS. The grey sphere and blue tetrahedron represent the Li-ion and ${\rm{PS}}_4^{3-} $ anion molecule, respectively^[29]. The dotted line represents the surface layer; (c) predominance phase diagrams of Li₂S-LiOH-Li₂O under different H₂O and H₂S chemical potentials; (d) hydrolysis reaction energy of sulfides, including 46 binary MS (grey circles), 52 ternary LiMS (green triangles) and 65 NaMS (orange triangles), as a function of cation M. More-negative reaction energy indicates worse moisture stability (moisture sensitive), whereas more-positive reaction energy indicates better moisture stability (moisture stable). The horizontal dashed lines correspond to the hydrolysis reaction energy of Li₂S (green) and Na₂S (orange), respectively; (e) guiding charts for cation selection for 52 lithium ternary sulfides. The moisture stability (hydrolysis reaction energy, y-axis) versus reduction stability (reduction reaction energy with alkali metal, x-axis)^[32].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 xLi₂O·(75–x)Li₂S·25P₂S₅ (x = 0, 4, 7, 11, 17) 在空气中暴露后产生的　(a) H₂S气体的含量及 (b) 室温下的电导率^[33]; (c) Li_3+3xP_1–xZn_xS_4–xO_x (x = 0, 0.02, 0.06) 和0.98Li₃PS₄·0.02ZnO的XRD图; (d) 第一性原理计算得出的Li_3+3xP_1–xZn_xS_4–xO_x (x = 0.02)结构模型图; (e) Li_3.06P_0.98Zn_0.02S_3.98O_0.02暴露于潮湿空气中产生硫化氢气体量随暴露时间的变化图^[34]; (f) 90Li₃PS₄·10M_xO_y (M_xO_y: ZnO, Fe₂O₃和Bi₂O₃)复合材料和Li₃PS₄玻璃在空气中暴露后产生的H₂S量随暴露时间的变化图; (g) 90Li₃PS₄·10ZnO复合材料和Li₃PS₄玻璃在空气中放置一天后的XRD图谱^[35]

Figure 4. (a) Amounts of H₂S gas generated from the xLi₂O·(75–x)Li₂S·25P₂S₅ (x = 0, 4, 7, 11, and 17) glass powders prepared using mechanical milling; (b) electrical conductivities of the pelletized xLi₂O·(75–x) Li₂S·25P₂S₅ (x = 0, 4, 7, 11, and 17) glass powders prepared using mechanical milling at room temperature^[33]; (c) XRD patterns of Li_3+3xP_1–xZn_xS_4–xO_x (x = 0, 0.02, 0.06) and 0.98Li₃PS₄·0.02ZnO; (d) structure of Li_3+3xP_1–xZn_xS_4–xO_x (x = 0.02) from DFT calculations; (e) the amount of H₂S generated from Li_3.06P_0.98Zn_0.02S_3.98O_0.02 when exposed in the humid air with different duration time^[34]; (f) H₂S amount as a function of exposure time to air for the 90Li₃PS₄·10M_xO_y (M_xO_y: ZnO, Fe₂O₃ and Bi₂O₃) composites and the Li₃PS₄ glass; (g) XRD patterns of the 90Li₃PS₄·10ZnO composite and the Li₃PS₄ glass after exposure to air for 1 day^[35].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 (a) 由Li₃SbS₄, Li₃PS₄和Li₄SnS₄粉末放出的H₂S气体的量; (b) 在200和500 ℃加热条件下, 合成的Li₃SbS₄和其玻璃陶瓷的拉曼光谱图^[39]; (c) 基于第一性原理计算的PS₄和 (P/Sn)S₄四面体很难被H₂O氧化程度的示意图^[41]; (d) Li₄Cu₈Ge₃S₁₂的晶体结构; (e) Li₄Cu₈Ge₃S₁₂固态电解质暴露于15%湿度的空气和2 M的氢氧化锂溶液前后的XRD谱图; (f) Li₄Cu₈Ge₃S₁₂固态电解质暴露于15%湿度的空气和2 M的氢氧化锂溶液前后的对比阿伦尼乌斯图^[42]

Figure 5. (a) Amounts of H₂S gas generated from the Li₃SbS₄ glass, Li₃PS₄ glass, and Li₄SnS₄ milled powders; (b) Raman spectra of the prepared Li₃SbS₄ glass and the glass-ceramic heated at 200 and 500 ℃^[39]; (c) schematic diagram of the difficult degree of being oxidized by H₂O of PS₄ and (P/Sn)S₄ tetrahedrons based on the DFT calculation^[41]; (d) crystal structure of Li₄Cu₈Ge₃S₁₂ viewed along the [100] direction; (e) XRD patterns of Li₄Cu₈Ge₃S₁₂ before and after exposure in 15% moist air and a 2 M LiOH aqueous solution; (f) comparative Arrhenius plots show a minor change in conductivity and activation energy before and after exposure^[42].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 (a) 95%质量分数Li₇P₃S₁₁硫化物固态电解质和5%质量分数的SEBS聚合物复合固态电解质的侧面扫描电子显微镜 (SEM) 图; (b) 100 mgLi₇P₃S₁₁硫化物固态电解质在潮湿空气水解产生H₂S气体量的检测装置; (c) 100 mg未复合和复合后的Li₇P₃S₁₁硫化物固态电解质在定量体积潮湿空气中产生的H₂S气体的量随暴露时间的变化图; (d) 100 mg未复合和复合后的Li₇P₃S₁₁硫化物固态电解质随着去离子水中的涌入后的稳定性照片图^[43]

Figure 6. (a) Cross-section SEM image of composite electrolyte film fabricated with 95 wt % Li₇P₃S₁₁ and 5 wt % SEBS; (b) setup used for H₂S gas measurements from 100 mg of Li₇P₃S₁₁ hydrolysis in air; (c) H₂S amount released vs time for fixed volume air exposed to 100 mg of bare Li₇P₃S11 and 100 mg of composite with hydrophobic SEBS polymer; (d) figures of bare Li₇P₃S₁₁ and composite electrolyte film before and after flooding in water^[43].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 (a) LGPS固态电解质锂化和去锂化时的电势分布和相平衡的第一原理计算结果^[45]; (b) Li/LGPS/LGPS-Pt/Pt半阻塞电极的循环伏安图, 扫描速率为0.1 mV·s^–1, 电压范围为0−2.0和1.0−3.5 V^[45]; (c) 原始LSPS及 (LSPS + 乙炔黑 (AB))复合材料在充电至4.2 V前、后的X-射线光电子能谱 (XPS) 谱图^[53]

Figure 7. (a) The first principles calculation results of the voltage profile and phase equilibria of LGPS solid electrolyte upon lithiation and delithiation^[45]; (b) cyclic voltammetry of Li/LGPS/LGPS‐Pt/Pt semiblocking electrode at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s^–1 in the voltage range of 0−2.0 and 1.0−3.5 V^[45]; (c) X-ray photoelectron spectra of the pristine LSPS, (LSPS+Acetylene black (AB)) composite before and after charged to 4.2 V^[53].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 (a) 450, 460, 480和500 ℃退火的LSPS-Cl粉末的形貌和组成的微观结构, SEM和透射电子显微镜 (TEM) 图像显示退火的LSPS-Cl电解质具有典型的核壳结构, 扫描透射电子显微镜结合能谱分析 (STEM EDS) 分析表明, 随着退火温度的升高, 样品的壳中Si浓度不断降低, S浓度不断提高^[61]; (b) 应变对LGPS电解质分解的影响机制示意图, 其中x_D为LGPS分解的分数. 橙色虚线表示当施加的压力可以忽略时, 原始LGPS和任意一组分解产物(D) 二元组合的吉布斯自由能 (G⁰(xD)). 绿色实线表示将机械约束应用于LGPS时的吉布斯自由能曲线. 由于LGPS在分解时倾向于发生体积膨胀, 因此当施加这种机械约束时, 应变吉布斯自由能 (G_strain) 增加. 在某个转折点 (表示为x_f) 处, 系统的吉布斯自由能量超过了破坏机械约束所需的能量 (蓝色虚线). 突出显示的灰色路径为机械约束LGPS系统的基态. 如果∂_xDG′ > 0, 则区域x_D < x_f是亚稳的^[62]; (c) 在不同温度下退火的LSPS-Cl样品的循环伏安 (C-V) 曲线^[61]

Figure 8. (a) Microstructural study on the morphology and composition of LSPS-Cl powders annealed at 450, 460, 480, and 500 ℃. SEM and TEM images show their typical core-shell structures. STEM EDS analyses of these samples show a continuously decreasing Si concentration and increasing S concentration in the shell of these samples versus the increasing annealing temperature^[63]; (b) illustration of the impact of strain on LGPS decomposition, where x_D is the fraction of LGPS that has decomposed. The dashed-orange line represents the Gibbs energy (G⁰(xD)) of a binary combination of pristine LGPS and an arbitrary set of decay products (D) when negligible pressure is applied. The solid-green line shows the Gibbs when a mechanical constraint is applied to the LGPS. Since LGPS tends to expand upon decomposition, the strain Gibbs (G_strain) increases when such a mechanical constraint is applied. At some fracture point, denoted x_f, the Gibbs energy of the system exceeds the energy needed to fracture the mechanical constraints (the dashed-blue line). The highlighted gray path is the suggested ground state for a mechanically constrained LGPS system. The region x_D < x_f is metastable if ∂_xDG′ > 0^[62]; (c) cyclic voltammetry (C-V) test and analyses of the LSPS-Cl samples annealed at various temperatures^[63].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 (a) 用于监测硫化物电解质与金属锂之间反应的原位XPS实验装置; (b) 原始LGPS样品以及沉积31 nm的锂金属后S 2p, Ge 3d和P 2p的XPS谱图和拟合结果. 拟合鉴定的物种以不同的颜色标记. 微弱的氧信号是由XPS腔室气氛中的微量的氧气引起的; (c) Li/LGPS/Li电池组装后 (0 h) 和组装后12 h的阻抗. 插图为用于拟合的等效电路, 拟合过程去除了红色数据点; (d) LGPS/Li与Li₇P₃S₁₁/Li界面电阻增加的比较. 拟合的不确定性绘制为误差线, 通常明显小于5 Ω·cm²; (e) Li/Li₆PS₅X/Li电池组装后 (0 h) 和20 h后的界面电阻均增加情况. 在初始的快速增长后, 界面电阻的增加表现出渐近行为; (f) Li₇P₃S₁₁, Li₁₀GeP₂S₁₂, Li₆PS₅Cl, Li₆PS₅Br和Li₆PS₅I电解质10年内界面电阻的模拟结果. 误差线由拟合误差得出^[24,76]

Figure 9. (a) Experimental setup of the in situ XPS experiment to monitor the reaction between sulfide and Li; (b) S 2p, Ge 3d, and P 2p XPS spectra and model fits for the pristine LGPS sample and after deposition of 31 nm Li metal. The identified species are marked and labeled in different colors. The small oxygen signal is caused by tiny fractions of oxygen in the atmosphere of the XPS chamber; (c) impedance of a Li/Li₁₀GeP₂S₁₂/Li cell directly after assembly (0 h) and after 12 h. The equivalent circuit used as fit model is shown in the inset. Red data points were removed for the fitting process; (d) increase of the Li₁₀GeP₂S₁₂/Li interphase resistance, in comparison to Li₇P₃S₁₁/Li. The uncertainty of the fit is drawn as error bars, which are generally significantly smaller than 5 Ω·cm²; (e) the SEI resistance increase for Li/Li₆PS₅X/Li cells directly after assembly (0 h) and after 20 h. The increasing resistance appears to show asymptotic behavior after initial growth; (f) simulation of the SEI resistance over 10 years for Li₇P₃S₁₁, Li₁₀GeP₂S₁₂, Li₆PS₅Cl, Li₆PS₅Br and Li₆PS₅I. Error bars were derived from the fit errors^[24,76].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 (a) 1.5 M LiTFSI/Pyr₁₃TFSI离子液体修饰前后Li/LSPS/Li对称电池在0.038 mA·cm^–2电流密度下的锂沉积-溶出曲线; (b) 加纯Pyr₁₃TFSI离子液体修饰、1.5 M LiTFSI/Pyr₁₃TFSI离子液体修饰和1.5 M LiTFSI/Pyr₁₃TFSI离子液体修饰的Li/LSPS/Li对称电池循环140 h后Li金属不同刻蚀时间下的F 1s XPS谱图; (c)不同锂盐/Pyr₁₃TFSI修饰界面的机理示意图^[58]

Figure 10. (a) Li⁺ stripping/plating curves of Li/LSPS/Li symmetric cells with and without 1.5 M LiTFSI/IL at a current density of 0.038 mA cm^–2 and the cycle performance of Li/LSPS/Li symmetric cell with 1.5 M LiTFSI/IL; (b) F 1s XPS spectra of Li metal at different etching times disassembled from (i) Li/(LSPS + pure Pyr₁₃TFSI)/Li, (ii) Li/(LSPS + 1.5 M LiTFSI/Pyr₁₃TFSI)/Li, and (iii) Li/(LSPS + 1.5 M LiFSI/Pyr₁₃TFSI)/Li symmetric cells after cycling for 140 h; (c) schematic illustration of interfacial modification mechanism of different Li salt/Pyr₁₃TFSI^[58].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 11 (a) Li/LPSCl_0.3F_0.7/Li对称电池中的锂沉积-溶出曲线; (b) Li金属/ LPSCl_0.3F_0.7固态电解质界面的XPS深度分析; Li/LPSCl_0.3F_0.7界面处Li 1s和F 1s XPS光谱随溅射深度的整体变化情况 (上面栏); 从上图提取的代表性Li 1s和F 1s XPS谱图^[80]

Figure 11. (a) Li plating and stripping in Li/LPSCl_0.3F_0.7/Li symmetric cells; (b) XPS depth profiling analysis of the Li metal/SSE interface. Overall evolution of the Li 1s and F 1s spectra with sputtering depth at the Li/LPSCl_0.3F_0.7 interface. Representative Li 1s and F 1s XPS spectra extracted from the upper panel^[80].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 12 (a) LiNi_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1O₂ (NCM811)正极和β-Li₃PS₄固态电解质相间界面形成和化学机械过程的示意图; (b) Li–In|β-Li₃PS₄|NCM811/β-Li₃PS₄固态电池恒流充放电过程阻抗变化. 左图: 0.1 C下首次充放电曲线显示出与阻抗测量周期相对应的电流中断. 右: 充电期间和放电期间的阻抗谱, 分别在充电或放电1 h后进行测量, 红色点表示阻抗谱的选定频率; (c) Li–In|β-Li₃PS₄|NCM811/β-Li₃PS₄ 固态电池复合正极中NCM811和β-Li₃PS₄的SEM图. 电池组装后未施加电流或电势的SEM图;电池在0.1 C下首次充电至4.3 V vs Li⁺/Li后的SEM图; 给定电池经过50个循环后, 在放电状态下的SEM图. NCM-811颗粒在脱锂 (充电) 过程中会收缩并失去与SE的接触. NCM形态在电解质上的残留痕迹表明, 活性材料和电解质之间最初紧密接触; (d) NCM811正极和β-Li₃PS₄固态电解质界面XPS表征. 原始β-Li₃PS₄; NCM811和β-Li₃PS₄的原始混合物, 不施加任何电流或电势; 首次充电后(0.1 C) 正极NCM811和β-Li₃PS₄复合残留; 50个循环后正极复合材料的S 2p和P 2p XPS谱图拟合结果. 蓝色峰归因于P^δ+—S^δ-键, 橙色峰与${\rm{P}}_2{\rm{S}}_7^{4-}$单元中的P—S—P桥键相关, 红色和绿色峰归属于更高氧化态的硫和磷物种. 尽管在混合NCM811活性材料和β-Li₃PS₄电解质时未观察到明显的反应发生, 充电后的复合正极XPS谱图显示了硫代磷酸盐固态电解质的氧化现象^[52]

Figure 12. (a) Schematic illustration of interphase formation and chemomechanical processes in LiNi_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1O₂ cathode and β-Li₃PS₄ solid electrolytes; (b) impedance spectra recorded intermittently during galvanostatic battery cycling. Left: First cycle charge and discharge profile of a Li–In|β-Li₃PS₄|NCM811/β-Li₃PS₄ cell at 0.1 C showing current interruption corresponding to the periods of impedance measurement. Right: Impedance spectra during charge and discharge periods. Measurements were conducted after 1 h of charging or discharging, respectively. Red points indicate selected frequencies in the spectra; (c) scanning electron micrographs of the cathode composite of NCM811 and β-Li₃PS₄. As prepared in a solid-state cell but without the application of current or potential; SEM images of a Li–In | β-Li₃PS₄| NCM-811 /β-Li₃PS₄ cell after single charging to 4.3 V vs Li⁺/Li at 0.1 C; SEM images of a given cell after 50 full battery cycles in the discharged state. The NCM-811 particles shrink during delithiation (charge) and lose contact with the SE. The remaining imprint of the NCM morphology on the electrolyte shows the initially intimate contact between the active material and the electrolyte; (d) peak deconvolution of the S 2 p and P 2 p spectra of pristine β-Li₃PS₄ for the pristine mixture of NCM811 and β-Li₃PS₄ without any application of current or potential, the cathode composite of NCM811 and β-Li₃PS₄ after the first charge (0.1 C), and the cathode composite of NCM811 and β-Li₃PS₄ after 50 cycles. Blue peaks are attributed to equivalent P^δ+–S^δ– bonds. Orange peaks were correlated to bridged P–S–P in ${\rm{P}}_2{\rm{S}}_7^{4-} $ units. The red and green peaks are assigned to more oxidized sulfur and phosphorus species. While no reaction appears to take place just upon mixing the SE and the active material, the spectra of the charged cathodes show evidence for oxidation of the thiophosphate solid electrolyte^[52].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 13 (a) CS-NCA@LiNbO₃材料的结构示意图 (以LiNi_0.85Co_0.15O₂为核心, LiNi_0.6Co_0.15Al_0.25O₂作为第一缓冲层, LiNbO₃作为第二缓冲层); (b) CS-NCA@LiNbO₃材料的高分辨透射电镜图像; (c) 在60 °C下循环2周后, 使用NCA, CS-NCA和CS-NCA@LiNbO₃正极的全固态锂电池充电态的阻抗谱图. 阻抗测试在RT进行; (d) 使用NCA, CS-NCA和CS-NCA@LiNbO₃正极的全固态锂电池中正极/电解质界面Li浓度分布的示意图; (e) 在60 °C下, 基于CS-NCA@LiNbO₃正极的全固态锂电池的倍率性能和循环性能曲线. 惰性LiNbO₃缓冲层的包覆量为1.37 wt%. 1 C = 200 mA·g^–1^[114]

Figure 13. (a) Illustration of the structure of CS-NCA@LiNbO₃ (LiNi_0.85Co_0.15O₂ as the core, LiNi_0.6Co_0.15Al_0.25O₂ as the first buffer layer and LiNbO₃ as the second buffer layer); (b) HRTEM images of CS-NCA@LiNbO₃ materials; (c) Nyquist plots of charged ASSLB using NCA, CS-NCA and CS-NCA@LiNbO₃ cathodes after 2 cycles at 60 °C. EIS tests are conducted at RT; (d) schematic illustrations of the interfacial Li concentration distribution in ASSLB using NCA, CS-NCA and CS-NCA@LiNbO₃ cathodes; (e) rate performance and cycle performance curves of CS-NCA@LiNbO₃ cathodes in ASSLB at 60 °C. Coating amount of inactive LiNbO₃ buffer layer is 1.37 wt.%. 1 C=200 mA·g^–1^[114].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 14 (a) 块体全固态电池示意图, 微米尺寸的多晶NCA正极是有很多堆积在一起的纳米晶组成, 紫色虚线矩形出显示用于TEM观察的减薄的区域; (b) NCA正极部分的ADF-STEM图像, 标尺是1 μm; (c) ADF-STEM图像和1.2 C充电下一系列不同状态下的NCA正极中的锂浓度分布图, 标尺是500 nm^[119]

Figure 14. (a) Schematic diagram of the bulk-type SSLIB. NCA forms micrometer-sized polycrystalline particles composed of aggregated nanocrystals (top-left inset). The purple dashed rectangle shows the thinned area for TEM observation; (b) ADFSTEM image around the NCA cathodes. Scale bar: 1 μm; (c) ADF-STEM image and series of corresponding Liconcentration maps of NCA acquired during 1.2 C charging. Scale bar: 500 nm^[119].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 15 (a) 原位近边结构X射线吸收光谱法的基于硫化物固态电解质的全电池实验装置图; (b) 在大光子能量区域获得布拉格光谱图; (c) 未包覆的NCA811的原位S元素的K近边吸收谱及 (d) 相应的mapping图; (e) Ni元素的K近边吸收谱和充放电曲线, LiNbO_x包覆的NMC811正极的原位; (f) S元素的K近边吸收谱及(g)相应的mapping图; (h) Ni元素的K近边吸收谱和充放电曲线^[121]

Figure 15. Operando XANES study of SSLIBs with bare and LNO-coated NMC811 cathodes during cycling: (a) Schematic diagram of theoperando cell; (b) Bruker spectrum in a large photon energy region. Operando S K-edge spectra with first derivative mapping, Ni K-edge spectra, and charge/discharge profiles of (c)−(e) bare NMC811-LGPS and (f)−(h) LNO NMC811-LGPS SSLIBs^[121].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 16 (a) 正负电压扫描区间的NCM/Li₆PS₅Cl界面的原位拉曼光谱; (b), (c) 来自NCM/Li₆PS₅Cl界面在两个电压 (第一次正电压扫描时为3.6和3.7 V) 的归一化原位拉曼光谱的拟合结果; (d) 在正电压和负电压扫描期过程中, 两个拉曼峰在418和425 cm^–1处的归一化峰面积百分比演变; (e), (f) 基于NCM/Li₆PS₅Cl界面${\rm{PS}}_4^{3-}$的P-S键的不同振动状态在充放电过程中的界面演化示意图^[93]

Figure 16. (a) In situ Raman spectra at NCM/Li₆PS₅Cl interface during the positive and negative potential sweeps; (b), (c) examples of normalized peak fitting results from in situ Raman spectra at NCM/Li₆PS₅Cl interface at two voltages (3.6 and 3.7 V in the first positive potential sweep); (d) normalized peak area percentages evolutions of two Raman peaks at 418 and 425 cm^–1 during the positive and negative potential sweeps; (e)−(h) schematic illustrations of interfacial evolution during the charge–discharge processes based on different vibration states of P-S bond in ${\rm{PS}}_4^{3-} $ at NCM/Li₆PS₅Cl interface^[93].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 17 (a) 电化学原位中子深度分析实验装置示意图; (b) Li/Li₃PS₄/Pt电池结构的示意图, Li沉积在Pt上, 在锂沉积过程中从电池的上表面开始进行深度剖析; (c) 在100 ℃下测试的Li/Li₃PS₄/Pt电池的时间分辨锂浓度曲线, 灰色箭头表示Li的连续沉积; (d) 在100 ℃下, Li/Li₃PS₄/Pt电池随着放电电流密度阶跃增大的电压-时间曲线; (e) 在100 ℃下锂沉积过程中, 不同时间Li₃PS₄中的锂浓度分布曲线^[64]

Figure 17. (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental set-up for operando NDP; (b) schematic structures of Li/Li₃PS₄/Pt cells. Li is plated on Pt, and the depth profiles are measured from the top surfaces of the cells during plating; (c) time-resolved lithium concentration profiles for Li/Li₃PS₄/Pt cells tested at 100 ℃. The grey arrows indicate continuous plating of Li; (d) voltage–time curves of the Li/Li₃PS₄/Pt cells discharged with the magnitude of the current density increased step-wise at 100 ℃; (e) lithium concentration profiles in Li₃PS₄-100 ℃ at different times during lithium plating^[64].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Zheng Z, Wu H H, Liu H, Zhang Q, He X, Yu S, Petrova V, Feng J, Kostecki R, Liu P, Peng D L, Liu M, Wang M S 2020 ACS Nano 14 9545 Google Scholar
[2]	An W, Gao B, Mei S, Xiang B, Fu J, Wang L, Zhang Q, Chu P K, Huo K 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1447 Google Scholar
[3]	Zheng Z, Li P, Huang J, Liu H, Zao Y, Hu Z, Zhang L, Chen H, Wang M S, Peng D L, Zhang Q 2020 J. Energy Chem. 41 126 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhang Q, Chen H, Luo L, Zhao B, Luo H, Han X, Wang J, Wang C, Yang Y, Zhu T, Liu M 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 669 Google Scholar
[5]	Zhong S Y, Shi J, Luo W W, Lei X L 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 078201 Google Scholar
[6]	Wang Y, Liu B N, Zhou G, Nie K H, Zhang J N, Yu X Q, Li H 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 068202 Google Scholar
[7]	Wang H, Lan X, Huang Y, Jiang X 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 098201 Google Scholar
[8]	Jiang L W, Lu Y X, Wang Y S, Liu L L, Qi X G, Zhao C L, Chen L Q, Hu Y S 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 048801 Google Scholar
[9]	Chen R, Li Q, Yu X, Chen L, Li H 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 6820 Google Scholar
[10]	Banerjee A, Wang X, Fang C, Wu E A, Meng Y S 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 6878 Google Scholar
[11]	Wang C, Fu K, Kammampata S P, McOwen D W, Samson A J, Zhang L, Hitz G T, Nolan A M, Wachsman E D, Mo Y, Thangadurai V, Hu L 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 4257 Google Scholar
[12]	Xiao Y, Wang Y, Bo S H, Kim J C, Miara L J, Ceder G 2020 Nat. Rev. Mater. 5 105 Google Scholar
[13]	Liu L, Xu J, Wang S, Wu F, Li H, Chen L 2019 eTransportation 1 100010 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhao Q, Stalin S, Zhao C Z, Archer L A 2020 Nat. Rev. Mater. 5 229 Google Scholar
[15]	Xu J, Liu L, Yao N, Wu F, Li H, Chen L 2019 Mater. Today Nano 8 100048 Google Scholar
[16]	Wang H, An H, Shan H, Zhao L, Wang J 2020 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 36 2007070 Google Scholar
[17]	Jin F, Li J, Hu C, Dong H, Chen P, Shen Y, Chen L 2019 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 35 1399 Google Scholar
[18]	Minami K, Mizuno F, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2007 Solid State Ionics 178 837 Google Scholar
[19]	Tachez M, Malugani J P, Mercier R, Robert G 1984 Solid State Ionics 14 181 Google Scholar
[20]	Kamaya N, Homma K, Yamakawa Y, Hirayama M, Kanno R, Yonemura M, Kamiyama T, Kato Y, Hama S, Kawamoto K, Mitsui A 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 682 Google Scholar
[21]	Kanno R, Murayama M 2001 J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 A742 Google Scholar
[22]	Kato Y, Hori S, Saito T, Suzuki K, Hirayama M, Mitsui A, Yonemura M, Iba H, Kanno R 2016 Nat. Energy 1 16030 Google Scholar
[23]	Deiseroth H J, Kong S T, Eckert H, Vannahme J, Reiner C, Zaiss T, Schlosser M 2008 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 755 Google Scholar
[24]	Wenzel S, Randau S, Leichtweiß T, Weber D A, Sann J, Zeier W G, Janek J 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 2400 Google Scholar
[25]	Culver S P, Koerver R, Zeier W G, Janek J 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1900626 Google Scholar
[26]	Lian P J, Zhao B S, Zhang L Q, Xu N, Wu M T, Gao X P 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A 7 20540 Google Scholar
[27]	Yang W, Tufail M K, Zhou L, Lü L, Chen R, Yang L 2020 Sci. Sin. Chim. 50 1031 Google Scholar
[28]	Muramatsu H, Hayashi A, Ohtomo T, Hama S, Tatsumisago M 2011 Solid State Ionics 182 116 Google Scholar
[29]	Kim J S, Jeon M, Kim S, Lee J H, Kim B K, Kim H 2020 Solid State Ionics 346 115225 Google Scholar
[30]	Sahu G, Lin Z, Li J, Liu Z, Dudney N, Liang C 2014 Energy Environ. Sci. 7 1053 Google Scholar
[31]	Liang J, Chen N, Li X, Li X, Adair K R, Li J, Wang C, Yu C, Norouzi Banis M, Zhang L, Zhao S, Lu S, Huang H, Li R, Huang Y, Sun X 2020 Chem. Mater. 32 2664 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhu Y, Mo Y 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 17472 Google Scholar
[33]	Ohtomo T, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M, Kawamoto K 2013 J. Solid State Electrochem. 17 2551 Google Scholar
[34]	Liu G, Xie D, Wang X, Yao X, Chen S, Xiao R, Li H, Xu X 2019 Energy Storage Mater. 17 266 Google Scholar
[35]	Hayashi A, Muramatsu H, Ohtomo T, Hama S, Tatsumisago M 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 6320 Google Scholar
[36]	Hayashi A, Muramatsu H, Ohtomo T, Hama S, Tatsumisago M 2014 J Alloys Compd. 591 247 Google Scholar
[37]	Brant J A, Massi D M, Holzwarth N A W, MacNeil J H, Douvalis A P, Bakas T, Martin S W, Gross M D, Aitken J A 2014 Chem. Mater. 27 189 Google Scholar
[38]	Park K H, Oh D Y, Choi Y E, Nam Y J, Han L, Kim J Y, Xin H, Lin F, Oh S M, Jung Y S 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 1874 Google Scholar
[39]	Kimura T, Kato A, Hotehama C, Sakuda A, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2019 Solid State Ionics 333 45 Google Scholar
[40]	Zhang Z, Zhang J, Sun Y, Jia H, Peng L, Zhang Y, Xie J 2020 J. Energy Chem. 41 171 Google Scholar
[41]	Zhao F, Liang J, Yu C, Sun Q, Li X, Adair K, Wang C, Zhao Y, Zhang S, Li W, Deng S, Li R, Huang Y, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhao S, Lu S, Sun X 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903422 Google Scholar
[42]	Wang Y, Lü X, Zheng C, Liu X, Chen Z, Yang W, Lin J, Huang F 2019 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 7673 Google Scholar
[43]	Tan D H S, Banerjee A, Deng Z, Wu E A, Nguyen H, Doux J M, Wang X, Cheng J H, Ong S P, Meng Y S, Chen Z 2019 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2 6542 Google Scholar
[44]	Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 23685 Google Scholar
[45]	Han F, Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y, Wang C 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1501590 Google Scholar
[46]	Sang L, Haasch R T, Gewirth A A, Nuzzo R G 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 3029 Google Scholar
[47]	Richards W D, Miara L J, Wang Y, Kim J C, Ceder G 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 266 Google Scholar
[48]	Wenzel S, Leichtweiss T, Krüger D, Sann J, Janek J 2015 Solid State Ionics 278 98 Google Scholar
[49]	Woo J H, Trevey J E, Cavanagh A S, Choi Y S, Kim S C, George S M, Oh K H, Lee S H 2012 J. Electrochem. Soc. 159 A1120 Google Scholar
[50]	Takada K, Ohta N, Zhang L, Xu X, Hang B T, Ohnishi T, Osada M, Sasaki T 2012 Solid State Ionics 225 594 Google Scholar
[51]	Jung S K, Gwon H, Lee S S, Kim H, Lee J C, Chung J G, Park S Y, Aihara Y, Im D 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A 7 22967 Google Scholar
[52]	Koerver R, Aygün I, Leichtweiß T, Dietrich C, Zhang W, Binder J O, Hartmann P, Zeier W G, Janek J 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 5574 Google Scholar
[53]	Zheng B Z, Liu X S, Zhu J P, Zhao J, Zhong G M, Xiang Y X, Wang H C, Zhao W M, Umeshbabu E, Wu Q H, Huang J Y, Yang Y 2020 Nano Energy 67 104252 Google Scholar
[54]	Wu X, Villevieille C, Novák P, El Kazzi M 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 11123 Google Scholar
[55]	Ohta N, Takada K, Sakaguchi I, Zhang L, Ma R, Fukuda K, Osada M, Sasaki T 2007 Electrochem. Commun. 9 1486 Google Scholar
[56]	Ohta N, Takada K, Zhang L, Ma R, Osada M, Sasaki T 2006 Adv. Mater. 18 2226 Google Scholar
[57]	Fan X, Ji X, Han F, Yue J, Chen J, Chen L, Deng T, Jiang J, Wang C 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaau9245 Google Scholar
[58]	Zheng B Z, Zhu J P, Wang H C, Feng M, Umeshbabu E, Li Y X, Wu Q H, Yang Y 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 25473 Google Scholar
[59]	Zhang Q, Cao D, Ma Y, Natan A, Aurora P, Zhu H 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1901131 Google Scholar
[60]	Culver S P, Koerver R, Zeier W G, Janek J 2019 Advanced Energy Materials 9 1900626
[61]	Wu F, Fitzhugh W, Ye L, Ning J, Li X 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4037 Google Scholar
[62]	Fitzhugh W, Wu F, Ye L, Su H, Li X 2019 Small 15 1901470 Google Scholar
[63]	Li X, Sun Q, Wang Z, Song D, Zhang H, Shi X, Li C, Zhang L, Zhu L 2020 J. Power Sources 456 227997 Google Scholar
[64]	Han F, Westover A S, Yue J, Fan X, Wang F, Chi M, Leonard D N, Dudney N, Wang H, Wang C 2019 Nat. Energy 4 187 Google Scholar
[65]	Nagao M, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M, Kanetsuku T, Tsuda T, Kuwabata S 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 18600 Google Scholar
[66]	Ma J, Chen B, Wang L, Cui G 2018 J. Power Sources 392 94 Google Scholar
[67]	Gao Y, Wang D, Li Y C, Yu Z, Mallouk T E, Wang D 2018 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 13608 Google Scholar
[68]	Zhang Z, Chen S, Yang J, Wang J, Yao L, Yao X, Cui P, Xu X 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 2556 Google Scholar
[69]	Garcia-Mendez R, Mizuno F, Zhang R, Arthur T S, Sakamoto J 2017 Electrochim. Acta 237 144 Google Scholar
[70]	Porz L, Swamy T, Sheldon B W, Rettenwander D, Frömling T, Thaman H L, Berendts S, Uecker R, Carter W C, Chiang Y M 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1701003 Google Scholar
[71]	Han F, Yue J, Zhu X, Wang C 2018 Adv. Energy Mater. 8 1703644 Google Scholar
[72]	Schlenker R, Stepien D, Koch P, Hupfer T, Indris S, Roling B, Miss V, Fuchs A, Wilhelmi M, Ehrenberg H 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 20012 Google Scholar
[73]	Kasemchainan J, Zekoll S, Jolly D S, Ning Z Y, Hartley G O, Marrow J, Bruce P G 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1105 Google Scholar
[74]	Ong S P, Mo Y, Richards W D, Miara L, Lee H S, Ceder G 2013 Energy Environ. Sci. 6 148 Google Scholar
[75]	Wenzel S, Weber D A, Leichtweiss T, Busche M R, Sann J, Janek J 2016 Solid State Ionics 286 24 Google Scholar
[76]	Wenzel S, Sedlmaier S J, Dietrich C, Zeier W G, Janek J 2018 Solid State Ionics 318 102 Google Scholar
[77]	Yao X, Huang N, Han F, Zhang Q, Wan H, Mwizerwa J P, Wang C, Xu X 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1602923 Google Scholar
[78]	Chen T, Zhang L, Zhang Z X, Li P, Wang H Q, Yu C, Yan X L, Wang L M, Xu B 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 40808 Google Scholar
[79]	Tao Y, Chen S, Liu D, Peng G, Yao X, Xu X 2015 J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 A96 Google Scholar
[80]	Zhao F P, Sun Q, Yu C, Zhang S M, Adair K, Wang S Z, Liu Y L, Zhao Y, Liang J W, Wang C H, Li X N, Li X, Xia W, Li R Y, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhao S Q, Lu S G, Sun X L 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 1035 Google Scholar
[81]	Xu R, Han F, Ji X, Fan X, Tu J, Wang C 2018 Nano Energy 53 958 Google Scholar
[82]	Liang J, Li X, Zhao Y, Goncharova L V, Li W, Adair K R, Banis M N, Hu Y, Sham T K, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhao S, Lu S, Li R, Sun X 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1902125 Google Scholar
[83]	Wang C, Zhao Y, Sun Q, Li X, Liu Y, Liang J, Li X, Lin X, Li R, Adair K R, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S, Sun X 2018 Nano Energy 53 168 Google Scholar
[84]	Davis A L, Garcia-Mendez R, Wood K N, Kazyak E, Chen K H, Teeter G, Sakamoto J, Dasgupta N P 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 6291 Google Scholar
[85]	Sang L, Bassett K L, Castro F C, Young M J, Chen L, Haasch R T, Elam J W, Dravid V P, Nuzzo R G, Gewirth A A 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 8747 Google Scholar
[86]	LePage W S, Chen Y, Kazyak E, Chen K H, Sanchez A J, Poli A, Arruda E M, Thouless M D, Dasgupta N P 2019 J. Electrochem. Soc. 166 A89 Google Scholar
[87]	Wang C, Adair K R, Liang J, Li X, Sun Y, Li X, Wang J, Sun Q, Zhao F, Lin X, Li R, Huang H, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S, Sun X 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1900392 Google Scholar
[88]	Lee Y G, Fujiki S, Jung C, Suzuki N, Yashiro N, Omoda R, Ko D S, Shiratsuchi T, Sugimoto T, Ryu S, Ku J H, Watanabe T, Park Y, Aihara Y, Im D, Han I T 2020 Nat. Energy 5 299 Google Scholar
[89]	Haruyama J, Sodeyama K, Han L, Takada K, Tateyama Y 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 4248 Google Scholar
[90]	Takada K 2013 Langmuir 29 7538 Google Scholar
[91]	Chen S, Xie D, Liu G, Mwizerwa J P, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Xu X, Yao X 2018 Energy Storage Mater. 14 58 Google Scholar
[92]	Otoyama M, Ito Y, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2016 J. Power Sources 302 419 Google Scholar
[93]	Zhang J, Zheng C, Li L, Xia Y, Huang H, Gan Y, Liang C, He X, Tao X, Zhang W 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903311 Google Scholar
[94]	Auvergniot J, Cassel A, Ledeuil J B, Viallet V, Seznec V, Dedryvère R 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 3883 Google Scholar
[95]	Zhang W, Richter F H, Culver S P, Leichtweiss T, Lozano J G, Dietrich C, Bruce P G, Zeier W G, Janek J 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 22226 Google Scholar
[96]	Yang J, Huang B, Yin J, Yao X, Peng G, Zhou J, Xu X 2016 J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 A1530 Google Scholar
[97]	Park K H, Oh D Y, Choi Y E, Nam Y J, Han L, Kim J Y, Xin H, Lin F, Oh S M, Jung Y S 2016 Advanced Materials 28 1874
[98]	Park K H, Bai Q, Kim D H, Oh D Y, Zhu Y, Mo Y, Jung Y S 2018 Adv. Energy Mater. 8 1800035 Google Scholar
[99]	Li X, Jin L, Song D, Zhang H, Shi X, Wang Z, Zhang L, Zhu L 2020 J. Energy Chem. 40 39 Google Scholar
[100]	Kitaura H, Hayashi A, Tadanaga K, Tatsumisago M 2011 Solid State Ionics 192 304 Google Scholar
[101]	Takada K, Ohta N, Zhang L, Fukuda K, Sakaguchi I, Ma R, Osada M, Sasaki T 2008 Solid State Ionics 179 1333 Google Scholar
[102]	Sakuda A, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2010 Chem. Mater. 22 949 Google Scholar
[103]	Sakuda A, Kitaura H, Hayashi A, Tadanaga K, Tatsumisago M 2008 Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 11 A1 Google Scholar
[104]	Jin Y, Li N, Chen C H, Wei S Q 2006 Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 9 A273 Google Scholar
[105]	Machida N, Kashiwagi J, Naito M, Shigematsu T 2012 Solid State Ionics 225 354 Google Scholar
[106]	Woo J H, Travis J J, George S M, Lee S H 2014 J. Electrochem. Soc. 162 A344 Google Scholar
[107]	Jung S H, Oh K, Nam Y J, Oh D Y, Bruener P, Kang K, Jung Y S 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 8190 Google Scholar
[108]	Zhang N, Ding F, Yu S, Zhu K, Li H, Zhang W, Liu X, Xu Q 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 27897 Google Scholar
[109]	Wang C, Li X, Zhao Y, Banis M N, Liang J, Li X, Sun Y, Adair K R, Sun Q, Liu Y, Zhao F, Deng S, Lin X, Li R, Hu Y, Sham T K, Huang H, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S, Sun X 2019 Small Methods 3 1900261 Google Scholar
[110]	Banerjee A, Tang H, Wang X, Cheng J H, Nguyen H, Zhang M, Tan D H S, Wynn T A, Wu E A, Doux J M, Wu T, Ma L, Sterbinsky G E, D’Souza M S, Ong S P, Meng Y S 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 43138 Google Scholar
[111]	Jung S H, Kim U H, Kim J H, Jun S, Yoon C S, Jung Y S, Sun Y K 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903360 Google Scholar
[112]	Deng S, Li X, Ren Z, Li W, Luo J, Liang J, Liang J, Banis M N, Li M, Zhao Y, Li X, Wang C, Sun Y, Sun Q, Li R, Hu Y, Huang H, Zhang L, Lu S, Luo J, Sun X 2020 Energy Storage Mater. 27 117 Google Scholar
[113]	Wang C, Liang J, Hwang S, Li X, Zhao Y, Adair K, Zhao C, Li X, Deng S, Lin X, Yang X, Li R, Huang H, Zhang L, Lu S, Su D, Sun X 2020 Nano Energy 72 104686 Google Scholar
[114]	Li X, Liang M, Sheng J, Song D, Zhang H, Shi X, Zhang L 2019 Energy Storage Mater. 18 100 Google Scholar
[115]	Lu J, Wu T, Amine K 2017 Nat. Energy 2 17011 Google Scholar
[116]	Yuan Y, Amine K, Lu J, Shahbazian-Yassar R 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15806 Google Scholar
[117]	Xiang Y, Li X, Cheng Y, Sun X, Yang Y 2020 Mater. Today 36 139 Google Scholar
[118]	Boebinger M G, Lewis J A, Sandoval S E, McDowell M T 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 335 Google Scholar
[119]	Nomura Y, Yamamoto K, Hirayama T, Igaki E, Saitoh K 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 2098 Google Scholar
[120]	Wang C, Li X, Zhao Y, Banis M N, Liang J, Li X, Sun Y, Adair K R, Sun Q, Liu Y, Zhao F, Deng S, Lin X, Li R, Hu Y, Sham T K, Huang H, Zhang L, Yang R, Lu S, Sun X 2019 Small Method. 3 1900261
[121]	Li X, Ren Z, Norouzi Banis M, Deng S, Zhao Y, Sun Q, Wang C, Yang X, Li W, Liang J, Li X, Sun Y, Adair K, Li R, Hu Y, Sham T K, Huang H, Zhang L, Lu S, Luo J, Sun X 2019 ACS Energy Lett. 4 2480 Google Scholar
[122]	Yamamoto K, Iriyama Y, Hirayama T 2017 Microscopy 66 50 Google Scholar
[123]	Masuda H, Ishida N, Ogata Y, Ito D, Fujita D 2017 Nanoscale 9 893 Google Scholar
[124]	Koerver R, Walther F, Aygün I, Sann J, Dietrich C, Zeier W G, Janek J 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 22750 Google Scholar
[125]	Chien P H, Feng X, Tang M, Rosenberg J T, O’Neill S, Zheng J, Grant S C, Hu Y Y 2018 J. Phys.Chem. Lett. 9 1990 Google Scholar
[126]	Wang C, Gong Y, Dai J, Zhang L, Xie H, Pastel G, Liu B, Wachsman E, Wang H, Hu L 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 14257 Google Scholar

[1]	Li Mei, Zhong Shu-Ying, Hu Jun-Ping, Sun Bao-Zhen, Xu Bo. Migration properties of Li⁺in Li_1+xAl_xTi_2–x(PO₄)₃. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(13): 138201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240044
[2]	Hua Biao, Sun Bao-Zhen, Wang Jing-Xuan, Shi Jing, Xu Bo. Effects of Li content on stability, electronic and Li-ion diffusion properties of Li_3xLa_(2/3)–x†_(1/3)–2xTiO₃ surface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(2): 028201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221808
[3]	Geng Xiao-Bin, Li Ding-Gen, Xu Bo. Mechanical stress-thermodynamic phase-field simulation of lithium dendrite growth in solid electrolyte battery. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(22): 220201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230824
[4]	He Bing, Lian Yu-Xiang, Wu Mu-Sheng, Luo Wen-Wei, Yang Shen-Bo, Ouyang Chu-Ying. Improvement of performance of halide solid electrolyte by tuning cations. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(20): 208201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221050
[5]	Lu Jing-Yu, Ke Cheng-Zhi, Gong Zheng-Liang, Li De-Ping, Ci Li-Jie, Zhang Li, Zhang Qiao-Bao. Application of in-situ characterization techniques in all-solid-state lithium batteries. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(19): 198102. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210531
[6]	You Yi-Wei, Cui Jian-Wen, Zhang Xiao-Feng, Zheng Feng, Wu Shun-Qing, Zhu Zi-Zhong. Properties of lithium phosphorus oxynitride (LiPON) solid electrolyte - Li anode interfaces. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(13): 136801. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202214
[7]	Ren Yuan, Zou Zhe-Yi, Zhao Qian, Wang Da, Yu Jia, Shi Si-Qi. Brief overview of microscopic physical image of ion transport in electrolytes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 226601. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201519
[8]	Shao Guang-Wei, Guo Shan-Shan, Yu Rui, Chen Nan-Liang, Ye Mei-Dan, Liu Xiang-Yang. Stretchable supercapacitors: Electrodes, electrolytes, and devices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(17): 178801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200881
[9]	Zhang Nian, Ren Guo-Xi, Zhang Hui, Zhou Deng, Liu Xiao-Song. Research progress of interface problems and optimization of garnet-type solid electrolyte. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 228806. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201533
[10]	Feng Wu-Liang, Wang Fei, Zhou Xing, Ji Xiao, Han Fu-Dong, Wang Chun-Sheng. Stability of interphase between solid state electrolyte and electrode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 228206. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201554
[11]	Zhao Ning, Mu Shuang, Guo Xiang-Xin. Physical issues in solid garnet batteries. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 228804. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201191
[12]	Yu Qi-Peng, Liu Qi, Wang Zi-Qiang, Li Bao-Hua. Anode interface in all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries: Challenges and strategies. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 228805. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201218
[13]	Peng Lin-Feng, Zeng Zi-Qi, Sun Yu-Long, Jia Huan-Huan, Xie Jia. Facile synthesis and electrochemical properties of Na-rich anti-perovskite solid electrolytes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 228201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201227
[14]	Cao Wen-Zhuo, Li Quan, Wang Sheng-Bin, Li Wen-Jun, Li Hong. Mechanism, strategies, and characterizations of Li plating in solid state batteries. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 228204. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201293
[15]	Liu Yu-Long, Xin Ming-Yang, Cong Li-Na, Xie Hai-Ming. Recent research progress of interface for polyethylene oxide based solid state battery. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 228202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201588
[16]	Chen Qi, Shang Xue-Fu, Zhang Peng, Xu Peng, Wang Miao, Nobuyuki Imanishi. Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 high lithium ion conducting solid electrolyte prepared by tape casting and modified with epoxy resin. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(18): 188201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.188201
[17]	Guo Li-Qiang, Tao Jian, Wen Juan, Cheng Guang-Gui, Yuan Ning-Yi, Ding Jian-Ning. Corn starch solid electrolyte gated proton/electron hybrid synaptic transistor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(16): 168501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.168501
[18]	Guo Li-Qiang, Wen Juan, Cheng Guang-Gui, Yuan Ning-Yi, Ding Jian-Ning. Dual in-plane-gate coupled IZO thin film transistor based on capacitive coupling effect in KH550-GO solid electrolyte. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(17): 178501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.178501
[19]	Guo Wen-Hao, Xiao Hui, Men Chuan-Ling. Effects of protons within SiO2 solid-state electrolyte on performances of oxide electric-double-layer thin film transistor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(7): 077302. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.077302
[20]	YU WEN-HAI, DING YI. FRACTAL MODEL OF THE INTERFACE BETWEEN ELECTROLYTE AND ELECTRODE AND ITS FREQUENCY RESPONSE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(10): 1621-1627. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.1621

Catalog

Vol. 69, Issue 22 - 2020-11-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 26616
PDF Downloads: 1038
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板