-
Elastic scattering is one of the useful approach to control the transmission behavior of microwave photons transporting in microwave quantum networks without energy consumption. Therefore, it has practical significance for the development of microwave quantum devices and the construction of multi-node microwave quantum networks. In view of the existence of the same device, specifically the transmission line embedded by a single Josephson junction, could be described by different circuit models (the series and parallel ones), in this paper we first theoretically analyze the transporting feature for the microwave photons being scattered by the different elastic scattering model, described by either the series or the parallel embedding models, generated by a single LC loop and a nonlinear Josephson junction device, respectively. The classical microwave transport theory predicts that, the series LC loop and the parallel LC loop lead to different microwave photon elastic scattering behaviors, i.e., the series LC circuit yields the resonant reflection and the parallel LC circuit leading alternatively to the resonant transmission. Recently, the transport properties of microwave photons scattered by a Josephson junction embedded in a transmission line had been discussed, and the results suggested that the Josephson junction embedded in the transmission line should be described by a series embedding circuit, which implies the resonant reflection. We argue here that, if the Josephson junction is embedded in parallel in the transmission line, the elastically scattered microwave photons should be transmitted by resonant transmission. In order to test which of the above two different embedding circuit models, yielding the completely different elastic scattering behaviors, is physically correct, we then fabricated such a device, i.e., a single Joseph junction device embedded in a transmission line is prepared, and measured its elastic scattering transmission coeffcient at extremely low temperature. The results are consistent with the expected effects of the parallel embedding circuit model, but conflicted with the behaviors predicted by the series embedding circuit model in the literature. Based on the above theoretical and experimental analysis on the elastic scattering of a single Josephson junction device, we further propose a scheme to control the elastic scattering behavior of microwave photons by modulating a DC superconducting quantum interference device with a bypass current, which could be applied to the construction of a microwave quantum network based on elastic scattering node controls.
-
Keywords:
- Elastic scattering /
- Microwave photons /
- Josephson junction /
- Superconducting quantum interference device
-
[1] Wei S, Jing B, Zhang X, Liao J, Yuan C, Fan B, Lyu C, Zhou D, Wang Y, Deng G, Song H, Oblak D, Guo G, Zhou Q 2022 Laser Photonics Rev. 162100219
[2] Wallquist M, Shumeiko V S, Wendin G 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74224506
[3] Devoret M H, Schoelkopf R J 2013 Science 3391169
[4] Bautista-Salvador A, Zarantonello G, Hahn H, Preciado-Grijalva A, Morgner J, Wahnschaffe M, Ospelkaus C 2019 New J. Phys. 21043011
[5] Slussarenko S, Pryde G J 2019 Appl. Phys. Rev. 6041303
[6] Blais A, Grimsmo A L, Girvin S M, Wallraff A 2021 Rev. Mod. Phys. 93025005
[7] Tseng P, Chen L, Shiu J S, Chen Y 2024 Phys. Rev. A 109043716
[8] Ma S, Zhu C, Quan D, Nie M 2022 Entropy 24794
[9] Zueco D, Mazo J J, Solano E, García-Ripoll J J 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86024503
[10] He S, He Q, Wei L 2021 Opt. Express 2943148
[11] Bi Y, Huang L, Li X, Wang Y 2021 Front. Optoelectron. 14154
[12] Astafiev O, Zagoskin A M, Abdumalikov A A, Pashkin Y A, Yamamoto T, Inomata K, Nakamura Y, Tsai J S 2010 Science 327840
[13] Jain V, Kurilovich V D, Dahmani Y D, Lei C U, Mason D, Yoon T, Rakich P T, Glazman L I, Schoelkopf R J 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 20014018
[14] Abdumalikov A A, Astafiev O, Zagoskin A M, Pashkin Y A, Nakamura Y, Tsai J S 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104193601
[15] Soloviev I I, Klenov N V, Bakurskiy S V, Kupriyanov M Y, Gudkov A L, Sidorenko A S 2017 Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 82689
[16] Feldhoff F, Toepfer H 2021 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 311
[17] Rabbi K, Athukorala L, Panagamuwa C, Vardaxoglou J C, Budimir D 2013 Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 551331
[18] Taris T, Kraimia H, Belot D, Deval Y 2015 J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 5274
[19] Bourassa J, Beaudoin F, Gambetta J M, Blais A 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86013814
[20] Clemente-Gallardo J, Scherpen J 2003 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 501359
[21] Aldrigo M, Zappelli L, Cismaru A, Dragoman M, Iordanescu S, Mladenovic D, Parvulescu C, Joseph C H, Mencarelli D, Pierantoni L, Russo P 2023 J. Comput. Electron. 221031
[22] Li J, Zhu X, Shen C, Peng X, Cummer S A 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100144311
[23] Krantz P, Kjaergaard M, Yan F, Orlando T P, Gustavsson S, Oliver W D 2019 Appl. Phys. Rev. 6021318
[24] Campagne-Ibarcq P, Zalys-Geller E, Narla A, Shankar S, Reinhold P, Burkhart L, Axline C, Pfaff W, Frunzio L, Schoelkopf R J, Devoret M H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120200501
[25] Ouyang P, He S, Wang Y, Chai Y, He J, Chang H, Wei L 2024 Phys. Rev. Res. 6013236
[26] Erickson R P, Pappas D P 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95104506
[27] Zueco D, Fernández-Juez C, Yago J, Naether U, Peropadre B, García-Ripoll J J, Mazo J J 2013 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26074006
[28] Han J, Ouyang P, Li E, Wang Y, Wei L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70170304(in Chinses) [韩金舸，欧阳鹏辉，李恩平，王轶文，韦联福2021物理学报70170304]
[29] Zheng D 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70018502(in Chinses) [郑东宁2021物理学报70018502]
[30] Castro C, Araújo M R, Cruz C 2021 Phys. Scr. 96105101
[31] Hua M, Tao M, Deng F 2016 Sci. Rep. 622037
[32] Leung N, Lu Y, Chakram S, Naik R K, Earnest N, Ma R, Jacobs K, Cleland A N, Schuster D I 2019 npj Quantum Inf. 518
Metrics
- Abstract views: 40
- PDF Downloads: 3
- Cited By: 0
下载:
