搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

8-9.5 keV正电子致Ti的K壳层电离截面的实验研究

钱宇瑞 吴英 杨夏童 陈秋香 尤俊栋 王宝义 况鹏 张鹏

引用本文:
Citation:

8-9.5 keV正电子致Ti的K壳层电离截面的实验研究

钱宇瑞, 吴英, 杨夏童, 陈秋香, 尤俊栋, 王宝义, 况鹏, 张鹏

Experimental study on Ti K shell ionization cross sections induced by 8-9.5 keV positrons

Qian Yu-Rui, Wu Ying, Yang Xia-Tong, Chen Qiu-Xiang, You Jun-Dong, Wang Bao-Yi, Kuang Peng, Zhang Peng
PDF
导出引用
  • 低能正电子碰撞原子内壳层电离截面的实验数据目前还很缺乏,从而影响了对近年来发展的各相关理论模型的检验,限制了慢正电子束流技术在诸多领域中的应用.本文采用慢正电子束流装置产生的8–9.5 keV正电子束碰撞纯厚Ti靶,利用硅漂移探测器(SDD)收集正电子碰撞Ti靶产生的X射线,同时采用高纯锗探测器在线获得与靶碰撞的入射正电子数,从而得到Ti的K壳层实验产额,并基于蒙特卡罗模拟程序PENELOPE获得模拟产额.将实验产额分别与内壳层电离截面数据库采用经典光学数据模型(ODM)和扭曲波玻恩近似理论模型(DWBA)的蒙特卡罗模拟产额进行对比,发现基于ODM理论模型的模拟产额与实验值有较大的偏差,基于DWBA理论模型的模拟产额与实验结果符合较好.根据实验产额和基于DWBA理论模型的模拟产额的比较结果,对蒙特卡罗模拟程序使用的DWBA理论模型数据库进行修正后再进行模拟和比较,从而得到可靠的8–9.5 keV正电子致Ti原子K壳层电离截面数据.
    Due to lack of experimental data of the inner shell ionization cross sections induced by low-energy positron, advanced theoretical models developed in recent years cannot be correctly evaluated, and the application of slow positron beam technique is greatly limited. Here we present the method of obtaining reliable experiment data of atomic inner-shell ionization cross section by positron impact. In this work, the slow positron beam device is used to generate 8-9.5 keV positron beams impacting on a pure thick Ti target, and the silicon drift detector (SDD) is adopted to collect the X-ray spectra produced by positrons impacting on thick Ti target, and the incident positron numbers are obtained by applying an HPGe detector to on-line collect annihilation photons. Then the experimental characteristic X-ray yields of Ti K shell impacted by 8-9.5 keV positron could be acquired. Meantime, the simulated characteristic X-ray yields are acquired by the PENELOPE program simulating the experiments. In the comparison between the experimental yields and the simulated yields based on two sets of different inner shell ionization cross section database in the PENELOPE code, i.e. the optical data model (ODM) and the distorted-wave Born approximation model (DWBA), there is a large difference between the simulated data from the ODM theoretical model and the experimental values, while the simulated yields from the DWBA theoretical model are in good agreement with the experimental results. Accordingly, a correction factor is introduced to modify the DWBA theoretical model database which is used in the PENELOPE, and then the experimental process is re-simulated. When the simulated yields and the experimental yields are in the highest consistence, the reliable Ti K shell ionization cross sections impacted by 8-9.5 keV positron could be obtained. The biggest advantage of using this method to obtain atomic inner-shell ionization cross section impacted by positron is that the effects of the multiple scattering of incident positrons in the thick target, from the bremsstrahlung and annihilation photons, and other secondary particles on the experimental characteristic X-rays do not need calculating (the calculation method that has been developed previously cannot give the more correct result about the contribution of the multiple scattering of incident positrons, from the bremsstrahlung and annihilation photons, and other secondary particles to characteristic X-rays).
      通信作者: 吴英, w_y@ncepu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号:11275071)、华北电力大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(批准号:2016-153)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(批准号:2018ZD10)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Wu Ying, w_y@ncepu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11275071), the North China Electric Power University Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program, China (Grant No. 2016-153), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Grant No. 2018ZD10).
    [1]

    An Z, Hou Q 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 042702

    [2]

    Wang J J, Gong J, Gong Z L, Yan X L, Wang B 2009 The second National Symposium on Nuclear Technology and Applied Research Mianyang, China, May 1, 2009 p331 (in Chinese) [王君君, 龚静, 宫振丽, 闫晓丽, 王波 2009 第二届全国核技术及应用研究学术研讨会 中国绵阳, 2009年5月1日, 第331页]

    [3]

    Llovet X, Powell C J, Salvat F, Jablonski A 2014 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 43 013102

    [4]

    Sepúlveda A, Bertol A P, Vasconcellos M A Z, Trincavelli J, Hinrichs R, Castellano G 2014 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47 215006

    [5]

    Zhao J L, An Z, Zhu J J, Tan W J, Liu M T 2017 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 134 71

    [6]

    Qian Z C, Wu Y, Chang C H, Yuan Y, Mei C S, Zhu J J, Moharram K 2017 Europhys. Lett. 118 13001

    [7]

    Zhao J L, Tian L X, Li X L, An Z, Zhu J J, Liu M T 2015 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 107 47

    [8]

    Nagashima Y, Saito F, Itoh Y 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 223201

    [9]

    Nagashima Y, Shigeta W, Hyodo T 2007 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 76 465

    [10]

    Tian L X, Liu M T, Zhu J J, An Z, Wang B Y, Qin X B 2012 Plasma Sci. Technol. 14 434

    [11]

    Hippler R 1990 Phys. Lett. A 144 81

    [12]

    Luo S, Joy D C 1991 Microbeam Analysis (Vol. 1) (San Francisco:San Francisco Press) pp67-68

    [13]

    Khare S P, Wadehra J M 1996 Can. J. Phys. 74 376

    [14]

    Segui S, Dingfelder M, Salvat F 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 062710

    [15]

    Colgan J, Fontes C J, Zhang H L 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 062711.

    [16]

    Salvat F, Fernández-Vaea J M, Sempau J 2005 PENELOPE-2005, A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport (Vol. 1) (Issy-les-Moulineau:OECD/NEA Data) ppix-xii

    [17]

    Zhu J J, An Z, Liu M T, Tian L X 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 052710

    [18]

    Cullen D E, Hubbell J H, Kissel L 1997 Report UCRL-0400 6 5

    [19]

    Ribberfors R 1983 Phys. Rev. A 27 3061

    [20]

    Tian L X, Zhu J J, Liu M T, An Z 2009 Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 267 3495

    [21]

    Bote D, Llovet X, Salvat F 2008 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 41 105304

    [22]

    Sempau J, Fernández-Vaea J M, Acosta E, Salvat F 2003 Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 207 107

    [23]

    Salvat F, Llovet X, Fernández-Vaea J M, Sempau J 2006 Microchim. Acta 155 67

    [24]

    Mayol R, Salvat F 1990 Phys. B 23 2117

    [25]

    He C Q, Wang J C, Zhu J, Wang S J 2013 Mater. Sci. Forum. 733 314

    [26]

    Kuang P, Han X L, Cao X Z, Xia R, Zhang P, Wang B Y 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 057802

    [27]

    Kuang P 2017 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing:Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (in Chinese) [况鹏 2017 博士学位论文(北京:中国科学院高能物理研究所)]

  • [1]

    An Z, Hou Q 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 042702

    [2]

    Wang J J, Gong J, Gong Z L, Yan X L, Wang B 2009 The second National Symposium on Nuclear Technology and Applied Research Mianyang, China, May 1, 2009 p331 (in Chinese) [王君君, 龚静, 宫振丽, 闫晓丽, 王波 2009 第二届全国核技术及应用研究学术研讨会 中国绵阳, 2009年5月1日, 第331页]

    [3]

    Llovet X, Powell C J, Salvat F, Jablonski A 2014 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 43 013102

    [4]

    Sepúlveda A, Bertol A P, Vasconcellos M A Z, Trincavelli J, Hinrichs R, Castellano G 2014 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47 215006

    [5]

    Zhao J L, An Z, Zhu J J, Tan W J, Liu M T 2017 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 134 71

    [6]

    Qian Z C, Wu Y, Chang C H, Yuan Y, Mei C S, Zhu J J, Moharram K 2017 Europhys. Lett. 118 13001

    [7]

    Zhao J L, Tian L X, Li X L, An Z, Zhu J J, Liu M T 2015 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 107 47

    [8]

    Nagashima Y, Saito F, Itoh Y 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 223201

    [9]

    Nagashima Y, Shigeta W, Hyodo T 2007 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 76 465

    [10]

    Tian L X, Liu M T, Zhu J J, An Z, Wang B Y, Qin X B 2012 Plasma Sci. Technol. 14 434

    [11]

    Hippler R 1990 Phys. Lett. A 144 81

    [12]

    Luo S, Joy D C 1991 Microbeam Analysis (Vol. 1) (San Francisco:San Francisco Press) pp67-68

    [13]

    Khare S P, Wadehra J M 1996 Can. J. Phys. 74 376

    [14]

    Segui S, Dingfelder M, Salvat F 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 062710

    [15]

    Colgan J, Fontes C J, Zhang H L 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 062711.

    [16]

    Salvat F, Fernández-Vaea J M, Sempau J 2005 PENELOPE-2005, A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport (Vol. 1) (Issy-les-Moulineau:OECD/NEA Data) ppix-xii

    [17]

    Zhu J J, An Z, Liu M T, Tian L X 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 052710

    [18]

    Cullen D E, Hubbell J H, Kissel L 1997 Report UCRL-0400 6 5

    [19]

    Ribberfors R 1983 Phys. Rev. A 27 3061

    [20]

    Tian L X, Zhu J J, Liu M T, An Z 2009 Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 267 3495

    [21]

    Bote D, Llovet X, Salvat F 2008 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 41 105304

    [22]

    Sempau J, Fernández-Vaea J M, Acosta E, Salvat F 2003 Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 207 107

    [23]

    Salvat F, Llovet X, Fernández-Vaea J M, Sempau J 2006 Microchim. Acta 155 67

    [24]

    Mayol R, Salvat F 1990 Phys. B 23 2117

    [25]

    He C Q, Wang J C, Zhu J, Wang S J 2013 Mater. Sci. Forum. 733 314

    [26]

    Kuang P, Han X L, Cao X Z, Xia R, Zhang P, Wang B Y 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 057802

    [27]

    Kuang P 2017 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing:Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (in Chinese) [况鹏 2017 博士学位论文(北京:中国科学院高能物理研究所)]

  • [1] 寻之朋, 郝大鹏. 含复杂近邻的二维正方格子键渗流的蒙特卡罗模拟. 物理学报, 2022, 71(6): 066401. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211757
    [2] 王丽敏, 段丙皇, 许献国, 李昊, 陈治军, 杨坤杰, 张硕. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟研究锆钛酸铅镧材料的中子辐照损伤. 物理学报, 2022, 71(7): 076101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212041
    [3] 李博, 李玲, 朱敬军, 林炜平, 安竹. 采用薄靶方法测量低能电子致Al, Ti, Cu, Ag, Au元素K壳层电离截面与L壳层特征X射线产生截面. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 173402. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220162
    [4] 周斌, 于全芝, 张宏斌, 张雪荧, 鞠永芹, 陈亮, 阮锡超. 80.5 MeV/u碳离子诱发铜靶的放射性剩余产物测量. 物理学报, 2021, 70(7): 072501. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201503
    [5] 王国强, 张烁, 杨俊元, 许小可. 耦合不同年龄层接触模式的新冠肺炎传播模型. 物理学报, 2021, 70(1): 010201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201371
    [6] 李颖涵, 安竹, 朱敬军, 李玲. keV能量电子致Al, Ti, Zr, W, Au元素厚靶特征X射线产额与截面的研究. 物理学报, 2020, 69(13): 133401. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200264
    [7] 羊奕伟, 严小松, 刘荣, 鹿心鑫, 蒋励, 王玫, 林菊芳. 贫铀球壳中D-T中子诱发的铀反应率的测量与分析. 物理学报, 2013, 62(2): 022801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.022801
    [8] 华钰超, 董源, 曹炳阳. 硅纳米薄膜中声子弹道扩散导热的蒙特卡罗模拟. 物理学报, 2013, 62(24): 244401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.244401
    [9] 兰木, 向钢, 辜刚旭, 张析. 一种晶体表面水平纳米线生长机理的蒙特卡罗模拟研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(22): 228101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.228101
    [10] 肖渊, 王晓方, 滕建, 陈晓虎, 陈媛, 洪伟. 激光加速电子束放射照相的模拟研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(23): 234102. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.234102
    [11] 赵兴宇, 王丽娜, 樊小辉, 张丽丽, 卫来, 张晋鲁, 黄以能. 玻璃化转变的分子串模型中分子串弛豫模式的计算机模拟. 物理学报, 2011, 60(3): 036403. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.036403
    [12] 樊小辉, 赵兴宇, 王丽娜, 张丽丽, 周恒为, 张晋鲁, 黄以能. 分子串模型中空间弛豫模式的弛豫动力学的蒙特卡罗模拟. 物理学报, 2011, 60(12): 126401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.126401
    [13] 熊开国, 封国林, 胡经国, 万仕全, 杨杰. 气候变化中高温破纪录事件的蒙特卡罗模拟研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(4): 2843-2852. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2843
    [14] 高飞, 山田亮子, 渡边光男, 刘华锋. 应用蒙特卡罗模拟进行正电子发射断层成像仪散射特性分析. 物理学报, 2009, 58(5): 3584-3591. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3584
    [15] 徐兰青, 李 晖, 肖郑颖. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟的散射介质中后向光散射模型及分析应用. 物理学报, 2008, 57(9): 6030-6035. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6030
    [16] 和青芳, 徐 征, 刘德昂, 徐叙瑢. 蒙特卡罗方法模拟薄膜电致发光器件中碰撞离化的作用. 物理学报, 2006, 55(4): 1997-2002. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1997
    [17] 王世奇, 连贵君, 熊光成. La0.7Ca0.3MnO3和CeO2混合块状样品电输运性质及使用分形迭代电阻网络模型的计算模拟. 物理学报, 2005, 54(8): 3815-3821. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3815
    [18] 王志军, 董丽芳, 尚 勇. 电子助进化学气相沉积金刚石中发射光谱的蒙特卡罗模拟. 物理学报, 2005, 54(2): 880-885. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.880
    [19] 王建华, 金传恩. 蒙特卡罗模拟在辉光放电鞘层离子输运研究中的应用. 物理学报, 2004, 53(4): 1116-1122. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1116
    [20] 郭宝增. 用全带Monte Carlo方法模拟纤锌矿相GaN和ZnO材料的电子输运特性. 物理学报, 2002, 51(10): 2344-2348. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2344
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6928
  • PDF下载量:  84
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-04-11
  • 修回日期:  2018-07-22
  • 刊出日期:  2018-10-05

/

返回文章
返回