-
硅石墨烯 (siligraphene) 作为石墨烯和硅烯的复合物, 由于其具有石墨烯和硅烯不具备的许多优异性能而受到了广泛关注. Siligraphene的性质与Si原子的分布以及它的结构密切相关, 但是目前对siligraphene的研究主要限于Si的规则分布和具有高对称性的平面结构. 为了超越这些限制, 本文基于密度泛函理论研究了siligraphene g-SiC7所有可能的Si分布及其平面和非平面结构. 首先从g-SiC7的35960种Si分布中筛选出了365种不等价的Si分布, 然后针对每个不等价的Si分布, 比较了平面结构和非平面结构的稳定性. 就Si分布而言, Si原子倾向于聚集在一起以降低能量, 而更分散的Si分布通常具有更高的能量; 就结构的平面性而言, 研究发现存在很多的非平面结构, 其能量明显低于平面结构. 在所有可能的Si分布中, 仅有8个平面结构对面外扰动是稳定的. 本文进一步研究了能量最低三种结构的动力学、热力学和机械稳定性, 发现它们都是稳定的. 能带计算发现, 尽管能量最低的几种结构存在明显的翘曲, 它们在第一布里渊区中两个狄拉克能谷仍得以保留, 并且在狄拉克点处打开了相当大的带隙. 本文计算了其贝里曲率, 发现在不等价狄拉克能谷处的贝里曲率是相反的, 这表明系统具有能谷自由度. 研究表明, siligraphene倾向于具有更集中的Si分布和翘曲结构, 并且最稳定的结构具有良好的电子性质.Siligraphene, as a composite of graphene and silicene, has attracted widespread attraction since it has many excellent properties that neither of graphene and silicene possesses. The properties of siligraphene are closely related to the distribution of Si atoms and its structure, but most of the current researches of siligraphene focus on the regular distribution of Si atoms and the planar structure with high symmetry. Therefore, we study in this work all possible Si atoms’ distributions with planar and nonplanar structures for siligraphene g-SiC7 based on density functional theory. At first, 365 kinds of inequivalent Si atoms’ distributions in g-SiC7 are selected out from the 35960 kinds of Si atoms’ distributions, and then for each inequivalent Si atoms’ distribution, a comparison of the stability between the planer and nonplanar structures is made. In terms of the Si distribution, the Si atoms tend to gather together to lower the energy. The more dispersed Si atoms’ distribution usually has appreciably higher energy. In terms of the planarity of the structures, it is found that there are many non-planar structures with significantly lower energy than the planar ones. For all possible Si atoms’ distributions, there are only 8 planar structures which are stable against out-of-plane perturbations. We further study the dynamic, thermodynamic and mechanical stability of the structures with the lowest energies and find that they are stable. The energy band calculation shows that two Dirac valleys still persist in the first Brillouin zone despite their appreciable structure deformation, and a considerable band gap is opened at the Dirac point. We calculate the Berry curvatures and find that the Berry curvatures at the inequivalent valleys are opposite, indicating that the system has valley degree of freedom. Our research shows that siligraphene is more likely to have a buckled structure and a more concentrated silicon atoms’ distribution, and the most stable structures have good electronic properties.
-
Keywords:
- siligraphene /
- silicon distribution /
- planar and nonplanar structures /
- first-principles calculation
[1] Kim S, Ihm J, Choi H J, Son Y W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 176802Google Scholar
[2] Lusk M T, Carr L D 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 175503Google Scholar
[3] Si N, Zhang F, Jiang W, Zhang Y L 2018 Physica 510 641Google Scholar
[4] Meng L, Wang Y L, Zhang L Z, Du S X, Wu R T, Li L F, Zhang Y, Li G, Zhou H, Hofer W A 2013 Nano Lett. 13 685Google Scholar
[5] Li L F, Lu S Z, Pan J B, Qin Z H, Wang Y Q, Wang Y L, Cao G Y, Du S X, Gao H J 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 4820Google Scholar
[6] Nijamudheen A, Bhattacharjee R, Choudhury S, Datta A 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 3802Google Scholar
[7] Wang H W, Wu M S, Lei X L, Tian Z F, Xu B, Huang K, Ouyang C Y 2018 Nat. Energy 49 67
[8] Zhou L J, Dong H L, Tretiak S 2020 Nanoscale 12 4269Google Scholar
[9] Abdullah N R, Mohammed G A, Rashid H O, Gudmundsson V 2020 Phys. Lett. 384 126578Google Scholar
[10] Liu X B, Shao X F, Yang B, Zhao M W 2018 Nanoscale 10 2108Google Scholar
[11] Tang X D, Liu W C, Luo C B, Peng X Y, Zhong J X 2019 RSC Adv. 9 12276Google Scholar
[12] Zhou L J, Zhang Y F, Wu L M 2013 Nano Lett. 13 5431Google Scholar
[13] Dong H L, Lin B, Gilmore K, Hou T J, Lee S T, Li Y Y 2015 J. Power Sources 299 371Google Scholar
[14] Zhao M W, Zhang R Q 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 195427Google Scholar
[15] Dong H L, Wang L, Zhou L J, Hou T J, Li Y Y 2017 Carbon 113 114Google Scholar
[16] Dong H L, Zhou L J, Frauenheim T, Hou T J, Lee S T, Li Y Y 2016 Nanoscale 8 6994Google Scholar
[17] Naqvi S R, Hussain T, Luo W, Ahuja R 2018 Nano Res. 11 3802Google Scholar
[18] Houmad M, Essaoudi I, Ainane A, El K A, Benyoussef A, Ahuja R 2019 Optik 177 118Google Scholar
[19] Wu C W, Huang J H, Yao D X 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 469 306Google Scholar
[20] Taluja Y, SanthiBhushan B, Yadav S, Srivastava A 2016 Superlattices Microstruct. 98 306Google Scholar
[21] Sun S, Qi Y, Zhang T Y 2015 Electrochim. Acta 163 296Google Scholar
[22] Yarmohammadi M, Ebrahimi M R 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 165409Google Scholar
[23] Hafner J 2008 J. Comput. Chem. 29 2044Google Scholar
[24] Reinhard M, Giehl K, Abel K, Haffner C, Jarchau T, Hoppe V, Jockusch B M, Walter U 1995 EMBO J. 14 1583Google Scholar
[25] Rusnak A J, Pinnick E R, Calderon C E, Wang F 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 137 034510Google Scholar
[26] Choi H C, Park Y C, Kim Y H, Lee Y S 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 2084Google Scholar
[27] Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1Google Scholar
[28] Ding Y, Wang Y l 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 18266Google Scholar
[29] Mostofi A A, Yates J R, Pizzi G, Lee Y S, Souza I, Vanderbilt D, Marzar N 2014 Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 2309Google Scholar
[30] Facio J I, Efremov D, Koepernik K, You J S, Sodemann I, Van D B J 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 246403Google Scholar
[31] Shi X Z, He C Y, Pickard C J, Tang C, Zhong J X 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 014104Google Scholar
[32] Yin H C, Shi X Z, He C Y, Martinez C M, Li J, Pickard C J, Tang C, Ouyang T, Zhang C X, Zhong J X 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 041405Google Scholar
[33] He C Y, Shi X Z, Clark S J, Li J, Pickard C J, Ouyang T, Zhang C X, Tang C, Zhong J X 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 175701Google Scholar
[34] Zhou N, Zhou P, Li J, He C Y, Zhong J X 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 115425Google Scholar
[35] Li J, Li S, Ouyang T, Zhang C, Tang C, He C, Zhong J 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 732Google Scholar
[36] Gong Z, Shi X, Li J, Li S, He C, Ouyang T, Zhang C, Tang C, Zhong J 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 155427Google Scholar
-
图 2 g-SiC7的总能与Si原子间平均距离的关系, 选取文献[17, 18]中g0-SiC7的总能为参考零点. 图中的罗马数字标记的是能量最低的非平面结构、平面结构和本文中与它们作为比较的一些结构. 插图柱状图代表在在不同能量区间中不等价Si分布在总分布数中的百分比
Fig. 2. For the relationship between the total energy of g-SiC7 and the average distance between Si atoms, the total energy of g0-SiC7 in the literature [17, 18] is selected as the reference zero point. The Roman numerals in the figure mark the non-planar structures with the lowest energy, planar structures, and some structures compared with them in this article. The inset histogram represents the percentage of unequal Si distribution in the total distribution in different energy intervals.
图 3 (a)和(b)中的左图分别对应图2中结构Ⅴ和Ⅳ的俯视图和侧视图, 其中棕色球表示C原子, 红色、绿色和蓝色球分别表示在平面上、平面内和平面下的Si原子, 棱形代表原胞. 中图和右图分别是它们的声子谱和能带
Fig. 3. The left panels of (a) and (b) are the top and side views of the structures V and IV in Fig. 2, respectively. The brown spheres stand for C atoms. The red, green and blue spheres denote the Si atoms above, inside and below the plane, respectively. The rhombus denotes the unit cell. The middle and right panels are their phonon spectra and energy bands, respectively.
图 4 (a), (b)和(c)中的左图分别是图2中能量最低结构Ⅰ, Ⅱ和Ⅲ的俯视图和侧视图, 其中棕色球表示C原子, 红色、绿色和蓝色球分别表示在平面上、平面内和平面下的Si原子, 棱形代表原胞, h代表翘曲高度. 中图和右图分别是它们的声子谱和能带. 在能带图中间的颜色梯度图为价带总贝里曲率
Fig. 4. The left panels in Fig. (a), (b) and (c) are the top and side views of the structures I, II and III in Fig. 2 with the lowest energies, respectively. The brown spheres stand for C atoms. The red, green and blue spheres denote the Si atoms above, inside and below the plane, respectively. The rhombus denotes the unit cell, h denote buckling height. The middle and right panels are their phonon spectra and energy bands, respectively. The central color gradient plane between the bands shows the calculated total Berry curvature of the valence bands.
图 5 (a), (b)和(c)分别为图2中g-SiC7的能量最低结构Ⅰ, Ⅱ和Ⅲ在500 K温度下的分子动力学模拟结果. 左图为15 ps后的几何结构, 右图为模拟过程中的能量随时间变化
Fig. 5. (a), (b) and (c) are the molecular dynamics simulations (at 500 K) of the three most stable structures I, II and III of g-SiC7 in Fig. 2. The left and right panels show the structures after 15 ps and the total energies vs time, respectively.
表 1 最稳定的三种g-SiC7的总能(以g0-SiC7的总能为参照)、翘曲高度h、带隙和弹性模量, 罗马数字与图2中的对应
Table 1. The total energy (with respect to the total energy of g0-SiC7), buckling height h, band gap and elastic moduli of the three most stable g-SiC7, the Roman numbers correspond to those in Fig. 2.
Structure Ⅰ-SiC7 Ⅱ-SiC7 Ⅲ-SiC7 Energy/(eV per formula unit) –1.85 –1.81 –1.80 h/Å 2.84 2.45 2.63 Band gap/eV 0.02 0.42 0.26 C11/(N·m–1) 237.30 270.45 219.15 C22/(N·m–1) 178.20 209.40 218.55 C12/(N·m–1) 12.30 31.50 21.90 C44/(N·m–1) 93.60 97.65 95.70 -
[1] Kim S, Ihm J, Choi H J, Son Y W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 176802Google Scholar
[2] Lusk M T, Carr L D 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 175503Google Scholar
[3] Si N, Zhang F, Jiang W, Zhang Y L 2018 Physica 510 641Google Scholar
[4] Meng L, Wang Y L, Zhang L Z, Du S X, Wu R T, Li L F, Zhang Y, Li G, Zhou H, Hofer W A 2013 Nano Lett. 13 685Google Scholar
[5] Li L F, Lu S Z, Pan J B, Qin Z H, Wang Y Q, Wang Y L, Cao G Y, Du S X, Gao H J 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 4820Google Scholar
[6] Nijamudheen A, Bhattacharjee R, Choudhury S, Datta A 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 3802Google Scholar
[7] Wang H W, Wu M S, Lei X L, Tian Z F, Xu B, Huang K, Ouyang C Y 2018 Nat. Energy 49 67
[8] Zhou L J, Dong H L, Tretiak S 2020 Nanoscale 12 4269Google Scholar
[9] Abdullah N R, Mohammed G A, Rashid H O, Gudmundsson V 2020 Phys. Lett. 384 126578Google Scholar
[10] Liu X B, Shao X F, Yang B, Zhao M W 2018 Nanoscale 10 2108Google Scholar
[11] Tang X D, Liu W C, Luo C B, Peng X Y, Zhong J X 2019 RSC Adv. 9 12276Google Scholar
[12] Zhou L J, Zhang Y F, Wu L M 2013 Nano Lett. 13 5431Google Scholar
[13] Dong H L, Lin B, Gilmore K, Hou T J, Lee S T, Li Y Y 2015 J. Power Sources 299 371Google Scholar
[14] Zhao M W, Zhang R Q 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 195427Google Scholar
[15] Dong H L, Wang L, Zhou L J, Hou T J, Li Y Y 2017 Carbon 113 114Google Scholar
[16] Dong H L, Zhou L J, Frauenheim T, Hou T J, Lee S T, Li Y Y 2016 Nanoscale 8 6994Google Scholar
[17] Naqvi S R, Hussain T, Luo W, Ahuja R 2018 Nano Res. 11 3802Google Scholar
[18] Houmad M, Essaoudi I, Ainane A, El K A, Benyoussef A, Ahuja R 2019 Optik 177 118Google Scholar
[19] Wu C W, Huang J H, Yao D X 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 469 306Google Scholar
[20] Taluja Y, SanthiBhushan B, Yadav S, Srivastava A 2016 Superlattices Microstruct. 98 306Google Scholar
[21] Sun S, Qi Y, Zhang T Y 2015 Electrochim. Acta 163 296Google Scholar
[22] Yarmohammadi M, Ebrahimi M R 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 165409Google Scholar
[23] Hafner J 2008 J. Comput. Chem. 29 2044Google Scholar
[24] Reinhard M, Giehl K, Abel K, Haffner C, Jarchau T, Hoppe V, Jockusch B M, Walter U 1995 EMBO J. 14 1583Google Scholar
[25] Rusnak A J, Pinnick E R, Calderon C E, Wang F 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 137 034510Google Scholar
[26] Choi H C, Park Y C, Kim Y H, Lee Y S 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 2084Google Scholar
[27] Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1Google Scholar
[28] Ding Y, Wang Y l 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 18266Google Scholar
[29] Mostofi A A, Yates J R, Pizzi G, Lee Y S, Souza I, Vanderbilt D, Marzar N 2014 Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 2309Google Scholar
[30] Facio J I, Efremov D, Koepernik K, You J S, Sodemann I, Van D B J 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 246403Google Scholar
[31] Shi X Z, He C Y, Pickard C J, Tang C, Zhong J X 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 014104Google Scholar
[32] Yin H C, Shi X Z, He C Y, Martinez C M, Li J, Pickard C J, Tang C, Ouyang T, Zhang C X, Zhong J X 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 041405Google Scholar
[33] He C Y, Shi X Z, Clark S J, Li J, Pickard C J, Ouyang T, Zhang C X, Tang C, Zhong J X 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 175701Google Scholar
[34] Zhou N, Zhou P, Li J, He C Y, Zhong J X 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 115425Google Scholar
[35] Li J, Li S, Ouyang T, Zhang C, Tang C, He C, Zhong J 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 732Google Scholar
[36] Gong Z, Shi X, Li J, Li S, He C, Ouyang T, Zhang C, Tang C, Zhong J 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 155427Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 5010
- PDF下载量: 101
- 被引次数: 0