超宽禁带半导体β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>及深紫外透明电极、日盲探测器的研究进展

郭道友; 李培刚; 陈政委; 吴真平; 唐为华

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20181845

摘要

β-Ga₂O₃是一种新型的超宽禁带氧化物半导体, 禁带宽度约为4.9 eV, 对应日盲区, 对波长大于253 nm的深紫外—可见光具有高的透过率, 是天然的日盲紫外探测及深紫外透明电极材料. 本文介绍了Ga₂O₃材料的晶体结构、基本物性与器件应用, 并综述了β-Ga₂O₃在深紫外透明导电电极和日盲紫外探测器中的最新研究进展. Sn掺杂的Ga₂O₃薄膜电导率可达到32.3 S/cm, 透过率大于88%, 但离商业化的透明导电电极还存在较大差距. 在日盲紫外探测器应用方面, 基于异质结结构的器件展现出更高的光响应度和更快的响应速度, ZnO/Ga₂O₃核/壳微米线的探测器综合性能最佳, 在–6 V偏压下其对254 nm深紫外光的光响应度达1.3 × 10³ A/W, 响应时间为20 ${\text{μ}}{\rm{s}}$.

关键词:

Abstract

Gallium oxide (Ga₂O₃), with a bandgap of about 4.9 eV, is a new type of ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor material. The Ga₂O₃ can crystallize into five different phases, i.e. α, β, γ, δ, and ε-phase. Among them, the monoclinic β-Ga₂O₃ (space group: C2/m) with the lattice parameters of a = 12.23 Å, b = 3.04 Å, c = 5.80 Å, and β = 103.7° has been recognized as the most stable phase. The β-Ga₂O₃ can be grown in bulk form from edge-defined film-fed growth with a low-cost method. With a high theoretical breakdown electrical field (8 MV/cm) and large Baliga’s figure of merit, the β-Ga₂O₃ is a potential candidate material for next-generation high-power electronics (including diode and field effect transistor) and extreme environment electronics [high temperature, high radiation, and high voltage (low power) switching]. Due to a high transmittance to the deep ultraviolet-visible light with a wavelength longer than 253 nm, the β-Ga₂O₃ is a natural material for solar-blind ultraviolet detection and deep-ultraviolet transparent conductive electrode. In this paper, the crystal structure, physical properties and device applications of Ga₂O₃ material are introduced. And the latest research progress of β-Ga₂O₃ in deep ultraviolet transparent conductive electrode and solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector are reviewed. Although Sn doped Ga₂O₃ thin film has a conductivity of up to 32.3 S/cm and a transmittance greater than 88%, there is still a long way to go for commercial transparent conductive electrode. At the same time, the development history of β-Ga₂O₃ solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors based on material type (nanometer, single crystal and thin film) is described in chronological order. The photodetector based on quasi-two-dimensional β-Ga₂O₃ flakes shows the highest responsivity (1.8 × 10⁵ A/W). The photodetector based on ZnO/Ga₂O₃ core/shell micron-wire has a best comprehensive performance, which exhibits a responsivity of 1.3 × 10³ A/W and a response time ranging from 20 ${\text{μ}}{\rm{s}}$ to 254 nm light at –6 V. We look forward to applying the β-Ga₂O₃ based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors to military (such as: missile early warning and tracking, ultraviolet communication, harbor fog navigation, and so on) and civilian fields (such as ozone hole monitoring, disinfection and sterilization ultraviolet intensity monitoring, high voltage corona detection, forest fire ultraviolet monitoring, and so on).

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
浙江理工大学物理系, 光电材料与器件中心, 杭州　310018

2.
北京邮电大学理学院, 信息功能材料与器件实验室, 北京　100876

3.
北京邮电大学, 信息光子学与光通信国家重点实验室, 北京　100876

通信作者: 唐为华, whtang@bupt.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 61704153, 51572241, 61774019, 51572033)和北京市科委(批准号: SX2018-04)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
Center for Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, Department of Physics, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China

2.
Laboratory of Information Functional Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

3.
State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

Corresponding author: Tang Wei-Hua, whtang@bupt.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61704153, 51572241, 61774019, 51572033) and Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology, China (Grant No. SX2018-04).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	程轶 2013 博士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学) Cheng Y 2013 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)
[2]	马海林, 苏庆 2014 物理学报 63 116701 Google Scholar Ma H L, Su Q 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 116701 Google Scholar
[3]	潘惠平, 成枫锋, 李琳, 洪瑞华, 姚淑德 2013 物理学报 62 048801 Google Scholar Pan H P, Cheng F F, Li L, Hong R H, Yao S D 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 048801 Google Scholar
[4]	Roy R, Hill V G, Osborn E F 1952 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74 719 Google Scholar
[5]	Kaneko K, Nomura T, Kakeya I, Fujita S 2009 Appl. Phys. Express 2 075501 Google Scholar
[6]	Fujita S, Kaneko K 2014 J. Cryst. Growth 401 588 Google Scholar
[7]	Shinohara D, Fujita S 2008 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47 7311 Google Scholar
[8]	Schewski R, Wagner G, Baldini M, Gogova D, Galazka Z, Schulz T, Remmele T, Markurt T, Wenckstern H V, Grundmann M, Bierwagen O, Vogt P, Albrecht M 2015 Appl. Phys. Express 8 011101 Google Scholar
[9]	Lee S D, Akaiwa K, Fujita S 2013 Phys. Status Solidi C 10 1592 Google Scholar
[10]	Lee S D, Ito Y, Kaneko K, Fujita S 2015 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54 030301 Google Scholar
[11]	Kaneko K, Nomura T, Fujita S 2010 Phys. Status Solidi C 7 2467 Google Scholar
[12]	Kaneko K, Kakeya I, Komori S, Fujita S 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 233901 Google Scholar
[13]	Mitome M, Kohiki S, Nagai T, Kurashima K, Kimoto K, Bando Y 2013 Cryst. Growth Des. 13 3577 Google Scholar
[14]	Wang T, Farvid S S, Abulikemu M, Radovanovic P V 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 9250 Google Scholar
[15]	Playford H Y, Hannon A C, Tucker M G, Dawson D M, Ashbrook S E, Kastiban R J, Sloan J, Walton R I 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 16188 Google Scholar
[16]	Lorenzi R, Paleari A, Golubev N V, Ignat'eva E S, Sigaev V N, Niederberger M, Lauria A 2015 J. Mater. Chem. C 3 41 Google Scholar
[17]	Takahashi M, Nakatani T, Iwamoto S, Watanabe T, Inoue M 2006 J. Phys. Condens Matter 18 5745 Google Scholar
[18]	Oshima Y, Víllora E G, Matsushita Y, Yamamoto S, Shimamura K 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 118 085301 Google Scholar
[19]	Ge S X, Zheng Z 2009 Solid State Sci. 11 1592 Google Scholar
[20]	Tsuchiya T, Yusa H, Tsuchiya J 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 174108 Google Scholar
[21]	Bermudez V M 2006 Chem. Phys. 323 193 Google Scholar
[22]	Yamaga M, Víllora E G, Shimamura K, Ichinose N, Honda M 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 155207 Google Scholar
[23]	Zacherle T, Schmidt P C, Martin M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 235206 Google Scholar
[24]	Orita M, Hiramatsu H, Ohta H, Hirano M, Hosono H 2002 Thin Solid Films 411 134 Google Scholar
[25]	Higashiwaki M, Sasaki K, Kuramata A, Masui T, Yamakoshi S 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 013504 Google Scholar
[26]	Dong L, Jia R, Xin B, Zhang Y 2016 J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 34 060602
[27]	Dong L, Jia R, Xin B, Peng B, Zhang Y 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 40160 Google Scholar
[28]	Tao X T 2019 J. Semicond. 40 010401 Google Scholar
[29]	Fu B, Jia Z T, Mu W X, Yin Y R, Zhang J, Tao X T 2019 J. Semicond. 40 011804 Google Scholar
[30]	Mohamed H F, Xia C T, Sai Q L, Cui H Y, Pan M Y, Qi H J 2019 J. Semicond. 40 011801 Google Scholar
[31]	Higashiwaki M, Sasaki K, Murakami H, Kumagai Y, Koukitu A, Kuramata A, Masui T, Yamakoshi S 2016 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 31 034001 Google Scholar
[32]	Razeghi M 2002 Proc. IEEE 90 1006 Google Scholar
[33]	Du X, Mei Z, Liu Z, Guo Y, Zhang T, Hou Y, Zhang Z, Xue Q, Kuznetsov A Y 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 4625 Google Scholar
[34]	Higashiwaki M, Sasaki K, Kuramata A, Masui T, Yamakoshi S 2014 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 21 Google Scholar
[35]	Higashiwaki M, Jessen G H 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 060401 Google Scholar
[36]	Villora E G, Arjoca S, Shimamura K, Inomata D, Aoki K 2014 Proc. of SPIE 8987 1
[37]	Wellenius P, Suresh A, Foreman J V, Everitt H O, Muth J F 2008 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 146 252 Google Scholar
[38]	Wellenius P, Suresh A, Muth J F 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 021111 Google Scholar
[39]	Vanithakumari S C, Nanda K K 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 3581 Google Scholar
[40]	Lin C F, Chen K T, Huang K P 2010 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 31 1431 Google Scholar
[41]	Choi S E, Oh Y T, Ham H K, Kim T W, Heo G S, Park J W, Choi B H, Shin D C 2011 Curr. Appl. Phys. 11 S255
[42]	Iizuka K, Morishima Y, Kuramata A, Shen Y J, Tsai C Y, Su Y Y, Liu G, Hsu T C, Yeh J H 2015 Proc. of SPIE 9363 1
[43]	Schwebel T, Fleischer M, Meixner H, Kohl C D 1998 Sens. Actuators B 49 46 Google Scholar
[44]	Kohl D, Ochs T, Geyer W, Fleischer M, Meixner H 1999 Sens. Actuators B 59 140 Google Scholar
[45]	Ogita M, Saika N, Nakanishi Y, Hatanaka Y 1999 Appl. Surf. Sci. 142 188 Google Scholar
[46]	Schwebel T, Fleischer M, Meixner H 2000 Sens. Actuators B 65 176 Google Scholar
[47]	Baban C, Toyoda Y, Ogita M 2005 Thin Solid Films 484 369 Google Scholar
[48]	Bartic M, Toyoda Y, Baban C I, Ogita M 2006 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part1 45 5186 Google Scholar
[49]	Feng P, Xue X Y, Liu Y G, Wan Q, Wang T H 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 112114 Google Scholar
[50]	Bartic M, Baban C I, Suzuki H, Ogita M, Isai M 2007 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 2879 Google Scholar
[51]	Liu Z F, Yamazaki T, Shen Y, Kikuta T, Nakatani N, Li Y 2008 Sens. Actuators B 129 666 Google Scholar
[52]	Arnold S P, Prokes S M, Perkins F K, Zaghloul M E 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 103102 Google Scholar
[53]	Lee C T, Yan J T 2010 Sens. Actuators B 147 723 Google Scholar
[54]	Hou Y, Jayatissa A H 2014 Sens. Actuators B 204 310 Google Scholar
[55]	Bartic M 2015 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 40
[56]	Hayashi H, Huang R, Ikeno H, Oba F, Yoshioka S, Tanaka I, Sonoda S 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 181903 Google Scholar
[57]	Pei G, Xia C, Dong Y, Wu B, Wang T, Xu J 2008 Scr. Mater. 58 943 Google Scholar
[58]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, An Y H, Li X J, Guo X C, Chu X L, Sun C L, Lei M, Li L H, Cao L X, Li P G, Tang W H 2015 J. Mater. Chem. C 3 1830 Google Scholar
[59]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, Li P G, Wang Q J, Lei M, Li L H, Tang W H 2015 RSC Adv. 5 12894 Google Scholar
[60]	Guo D Y, An Y H, Cui W, Zhi Y S, Zhao X L, Lei M, Li L H, Li P G, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 25166 Google Scholar
[61]	Gao X, Xia Y, Ji J, Xu H, Su Y, Li H, Yang C, Guo H, Yin J, Liu Z 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 193501 Google Scholar
[62]	Yang J B, Chang T C, Huang J J, Chen S C, Yang P C, Chen Y T, Tseng H C, Sze S M, Chu A K, Tsai M J 2013 Thin Solid Films 529 200 Google Scholar
[63]	Aoki Y, Wiemann C, Feyer V, Kim H S, Schneider C M, Ill-Yoo H, Martin M 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 3473 Google Scholar
[64]	Hsu C W, Chou L J 2012 Nano Lett. 12 4247 Google Scholar
[65]	Lee D Y, Tseng T Y 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 114117 Google Scholar
[66]	Huang J J, Chang T C, Yang J B, Chen S C, Yang P C, Chen Y T, Tseng H C, Sze S M, Chu A K, Tsai M J 2012 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33 1387 Google Scholar
[67]	Yang J B, Chang T C, Huang J J, Chen Y T, Yang P C, Tseng H C, Chu A K, Sze S M, Tsai M J 2013 Thin Solid Films 528 26 Google Scholar
[68]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, An Y H, Li P G, Wang P C, Chu X L, Guo X C, Zhi Y S, Lei M, Li L H, Tang W H 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 042105 Google Scholar
[69]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, Zhang L J, Yang T, Hu Q R, Lei M, Li P G, Li L H, Tang W H 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 032104 Google Scholar
[70]	Guo D Y, Qian Y P, Su Y L, Shi H Z, Li P G, Wu J T, Wang S L, Cui C, Tang W H 2017 AIP Adv. 7 065312 Google Scholar
[71]	Wang P C, Li P G, Zhi Y S, Guo D Y, Pan A Q, Zhan J M, Liu H, Shen J Q, Tang W H 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 262110 Google Scholar
[72]	Gollakota P, Dhawan A, Wellenius P, Lunardi L M, Muth J F, Saripalli Y N 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 221906 Google Scholar
[73]	Sawada K, Adachi S 2014 ECS J. Solid State Sci. 3 R238 Google Scholar
[74]	Kang B K, Mang S R, Lim H D, Song K M, Song Y H, Go D H, Jung M K, Senthil K, Yoon D H 2014 Mater. Chem. Phys. 147 178 Google Scholar
[75]	Wu Z, Bai G, Hu Q, Guo D, Sun C, Ji L, Lei M, Li L, Li P, Hao J, Tang W 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 171910 Google Scholar
[76]	Wu Z, Bai G, Qu Y, Guo D, Li L, Li P, Hao J, Tang W 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 211903 Google Scholar
[77]	Li W, Peng Y, Wang C, Zhao X, Zhi Y, Yan H, Li L, Li P, Yang H, Wu Z, Tang W 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 697 388 Google Scholar
[78]	Orita M, Ohta H, Hirano M, Hosono H 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 4166 Google Scholar
[79]	Suzuki N, Ohira S, Tanaka M, Sugawara T, Nakajima K, Shishido T 2007 Phys. Status Solidi C 4 2310 Google Scholar
[80]	Ou S L, Wuu D S, Fu Y C, Liu S P, Horng R H, Liu L, Feng Z C 2012 Mater. Chem. Phys. 133 700 Google Scholar
[81]	Du X J, Li Z, Luan C N, Wang W G, Wang M X, Feng X J, Xiao H D, Ma J 2015 J. Mater. Sci. 50 3252 Google Scholar
[82]	Mi W, Li Z, Luan C N, Xiao H D, Zhao C S, Ma J 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 2572 Google Scholar
[83]	Minami T, Takeda Y, Kakumu T, Takata S, Fukuda I 1997 J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 15 958 Google Scholar
[84]	Kim S, Kim S J, Kim K H, Kim H D, Kim T G 2014 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 2569 Google Scholar
[85]	Kim S J, Park S Y, Kim K H, Kim S W, Kim T G 2014 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35 232 Google Scholar
[86]	Woo K Y, Lee J H, Kim K H, Kim S J, Kim T G 2014 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 1760 Google Scholar
[87]	Zhuang H H, Yan J L, Xu C Y, Meng D L 2014 Appl. Surf. Sci. 307 241 Google Scholar
[88]	Li Y, Tokizono T, Liao M, Zhong M, Koide Y, Yamada I, Delaunay J J 2010 Adv. Funct. Mater. 20 3972 Google Scholar
[89]	Oshima T, Okuno T, Arai N, Suzuki N, Hino H, Fujita S 2009 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 48 011605 Google Scholar
[90]	Oshima T, Okuno T, Fujita S 2007 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46 7217 Google Scholar
[91]	Feng P, Zhang J Y, Li Q H, Wang T H 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 153107 Google Scholar
[92]	Weng W Y, Hsueh T J, Chang S J, Huang G J, Chang S P 2010 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22 709 Google Scholar
[93]	Wu Y L, Chang S J, Weng W Y, Liu C H, Tsai T Y, Hsu C L, Chen K C 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 2368 Google Scholar
[94]	Li L, Auer E, Liao M, Fang X, Zhai T, Gautam U K, Lugstein A, Koide Y, Bando Y, Golberg D 2011 Nanoscale 3 1120 Google Scholar
[95]	Tian W, Zhi C, Zhai T, Chen S M, Wang X, Liao M Y, Golberg D, Bando Y 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 17984 Google Scholar
[96]	Feng W, Wang X N, Zhang J, Wang L, Zheng W, Hu P, Cao W, Yang B 2014 J. Mater. Chem. C 2 3254 Google Scholar
[97]	Teng Y, Song L X, Ponchel A, Yang Z K, Xia J 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 6238 Google Scholar
[98]	Zou R J, Zhang Z Y, Liu Q, Hu J Q, Sang L W, Liao M Y, Zhang W J 2014 Small 10 1848 Google Scholar
[99]	Zhong M Z, Wei Z M, Meng X Q, Wu F, Li J 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 619 572 Google Scholar
[100]	Zhao B, Wang F, Chen H Y, Wang Y P, Jiang M M, Fang X S, Zhao D X 2015 Nano Lett. 15 3988 Google Scholar
[101]	Zhao B, Wang F, Chen H, Zheng L, Su L, Zhao D, Fang X 2017 Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 1700264 Google Scholar
[102]	Chen X, Liu K, Zhang Z, Wang C, Li B, Zhao H, Zhao D, Shen D 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 4185 Google Scholar
[103]	Oh S, Kim J, Ren F, Pearton S J, Kim J 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 9245 Google Scholar
[104]	Kwon Y, Lee G, Oh S, Kim J, Pearton S J, Ren F 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 131901 Google Scholar
[105]	Oh S, Mastro M A, Tadjer M J, Kim J 2017 ECS J. Solid State. Sci. 6 Q79 Google Scholar
[106]	Oh S, Kim C K, Kim J 2017 ACS Photonics 5 1123
[107]	Du J, Xing J, Ge C, Liu H, Liu P, Hao H, Dong J, Zheng Z, Gao H 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 425105 Google Scholar
[108]	He T, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Lin W, Fu K, Sun C, Shi F, Ding X, Yu G, Zhang K, Lu S, Zhang X, Zhang B 2018 Nanophotonics 7 1557 Google Scholar
[109]	Oshima T, Okuno T, Arai N, Suzuki N, Ohira S, Fujita S 2008 Appl. Phys. Express 1 011202 Google Scholar
[110]	Suzuki R, Nakagomi S, Kokubun Y, Arai N, Ohira S 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 222102 Google Scholar
[111]	Suzuki R, Nakagomi S, Kokubun Y 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 131114 Google Scholar
[112]	Kong W Y, Wu G A, Wang K Y, Zhang T F, Zou Y F, Wang D D, Luo L B 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 10725 Google Scholar
[113]	Mu W, Jia Z, Yin Y, Hu Q, Zhang J, Feng Q, Hao Y, Tao X 2017 CrystEngComm 19 5122 Google Scholar
[114]	Yang C, Liang H, Zhang Z, Xia X, Tao P, Chen Y, Zhang H, Shen R, Luo Y, Du G 2018 RSC Adv. 8 6341 Google Scholar
[115]	Ji Z, Du J, Fan J, Wang W 2006 Opt. Mater. 28 415 Google Scholar
[116]	Kokubun Y, Miura K, Endo F, Nakagomi S 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 031912 Google Scholar
[117]	Weng W Y, Hsueh T J, Chang S J, Huang G J, Hsueh H T 2011 IEEE Sens. J. 11 999 Google Scholar
[118]	Huang Z D, Weng W Y, Chang S J, Chiu C, Wu S, Hsueh T 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 3462 Google Scholar
[119]	Huang Z D, Weng W Y, Chang S J, Hua Y F, Chiu C J, Hsueh T J, Wu S L 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 1187 Google Scholar
[120]	Huang Z D, Weng W Y, Chang S J, Hua Y F, Chiu C J, Tsai T Y 2013 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 25 809
[121]	Nakagomi S, Momo T, Takahashi S, Kokubun Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 072105 Google Scholar
[122]	Ravadgar P, Horng R H, Yao S D, Lee H Y, Wu R, Ou S L, Tu L W 2013 Opt. Express 21 24599 Google Scholar
[123]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, Li P G, An Y H, Liu H, Guo X C, Yan H, Wang G F, Sun C L, Li L H, Tang W H 2014 Opt. Mater. Express 4 1067 Google Scholar
[124]	Wang X, Chen Z W, Guo D Y, Zhang X, Wu Z P, Li P G, Tang W H 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 2918 Google Scholar
[125]	Peng Y K, Zhang Y, Chen Z W, Guo D Y, Zhang X, Li P G, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2018 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 30 993 Google Scholar
[126]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, An Y H, Guo X C, Chu X L, Sun C L, Li L H, Li P G, Tang W H 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 023507 Google Scholar
[127]	Guo D Y, Li P G, Wu Z P, Cui W, Zhao X L, Lei M, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 24190 Google Scholar
[128]	Qian Y P, Guo D Y, Chu X L, Shi H Z, Zhu W K, Wang K, Wang S L, Li P G, Zhang X H, Tang W H 2017 Mater. Lett. 209 558 Google Scholar
[129]	Guo D Y, Qin X Y, Lv M, Shi H Z, Su Y L, Yao G S, Wang S L, Li C R, Li P G, Tang W H 2017 Electron. Mater. Lett. 13 483 Google Scholar
[130]	Zhao X L, Cui W, Wu Z P, Guo D Y, Li P G, An Y H, Li L H, Tang W H 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 46 2366 Google Scholar
[131]	Zhao X L, Wu Z P, Cui W, Zhi Y S, Guo D Y, Li L H, Tang W H 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 983 Google Scholar
[132]	Zhao X L, Wu Z P, Guo D Y, Cui W, Li P G, An Y H, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 31 065010 Google Scholar
[133]	Zhao X L, Zhi Y S, Cui W, Guo D Y, Wu Z P, Li P G, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 Opt. Mater. 62 651 Google Scholar
[134]	Zhao X L, Wu Z P, Zhi Y S, An Y H, Cui W, Li L H, Tang W H 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 085102 Google Scholar
[135]	Zhang M, Liu G H, Gu X H, Zhou J R 2014 Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 14 3827 Google Scholar
[136]	Li W H, Zhao X L, Zhi Y S, Zhang X H, Chen Z W, Chu X L, Yang H J, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2018 Appl. Opt. 57 538 Google Scholar
[137]	Guo D Y, Zhao X L, Zhi Y S, Cui W, Huang Y Q, An Y H, Li P G, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2016 Mater. Lett. 164 364 Google Scholar
[138]	Ai M L, Guo D Y, Qu Y Y, Cui W, Wu Z P, Li P G, Li L H, Tang W H 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 692 634 Google Scholar
[139]	An H Y, Chu X L, Huang Y Q, Zhi Y S, Guo D Y, Li P G, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2016 Prog. Nat. Sci. 26 65 Google Scholar
[140]	Cui W, Guo D Y, Zhao X L, Wu Z P, Li P G, Li L H, Cui C, Tang W H 2016 RSC Adv. 6 100683 Google Scholar
[141]	Huang Y Q, An Y H, Wu Z P, Guo D Y, Zhi Y S, Cui W, Zhao X L, Tang W H 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 717 8 Google Scholar
[142]	Guo D Y, Liu H, Li P G, Wu Z P, Wang S L, Cui C, Li C R, Tang W H 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 1619 Google Scholar
[143]	Guo X C, Hao N H, Guo D Y, Wu Z P, An Y H, Chu X L, Li L H, Li P G, Lei M, Tang W H 2016 J. Alloys Compd. 660 136 Google Scholar
[144]	Guo D Y, Shi H Z, Qian Y P, Lv M, Li P G, Su Y L, Liu Q, Chen K, Wang S L, Cui C, Li C R, Tang W H 2017 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 32 03LT1
[145]	Wu Z P, Jiao L, Wang X L, Guo D Y, Li W H, Li L H, Huang F, Tang W H 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 8688 Google Scholar
[146]	Li P G, Shi H Z, Chen K, Guo D Y, Cui W, Zhi Y S, Wang S L, Wu Z P, Chen Z W, Tang W H 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 10562 Google Scholar
[147]	Guo D Y, Su Y L, Shi H Z, Li P G, Zhao N, Ye J H, Wang S L, Liu A P, Chen Z W, Li C R, Tang W H 2018 ACS Nano 12 12827 Google Scholar
[148]	An H Y, Zhi Y S, Wu Z P, Cui W, Zhao X L, Guo D Y, Li P G, Tang W H 2016 Appl. Phys. A 122 1036 Google Scholar
[149]	Qu Y Y, Wu Z P, Ai M L, Guo D Y, An Y H, Yang H J, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 J. Alloys Compd. 680 247 Google Scholar
[150]	An Y H, Guo D Y, Li S Y, Wu Z P, Huang Y Q, Li P G, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 285111 Google Scholar
[151]	Cui W, Zhao X L, An Y H, Guo D Y, Qing X Y, Wu Z P, Li P G, Li L H, Cui C, Tang W H 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 135109 Google Scholar
[152]	Guo P, Xiong J, Zhao X H, Sheng T, Yue C, Tao B W, Liu X Z 2014 J. Mater. Sci. 25 3629
[153]	Hu G C, Shan C X, Zhang N, Jiang M M, Wang S P, Shen D Z 2015 Opt. Express 23 13554 Google Scholar
[154]	Sheng T, Liu X Z, Qian L X, Xu B, Zhang Y Y 2015 Rare Met.Google Scholar
[155]	Yu F P, Ou S L, Wuu D S 2015 Opt. Mater. Express 5 1240 Google Scholar
[156]	Liu X Z, Guo P, Sheng T, Qian L X, Zhang W L, Li Y R 2016 Opt. Mater. 51 203 Google Scholar
[157]	Qian L X, Liu X Z, Sheng T, Zhang W L, Li Y R, Lai P T 2016 AIP Adv. 6 045009 Google Scholar
[158]	Liu X Z, Yue C, Xia C T, Zhang W L 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 017201 Google Scholar
[159]	Qian L X, Wu Z H, Zhang Y Y, Lai P T, Liu X Z, Li Y R 2017 ACS Photonics 4 2203 Google Scholar
[160]	Feng Q, Huang L, Han G, Li F, Li X, Fang L, Xing X, Zhang J, Mu W, Jia Z, Guo D, Tang W, Tao X, Hao Y 2016 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 63 3578 Google Scholar
[161]	Feng Z Q, Huang L, Feng Q, Li X, Zhang H, Tang W H, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 2229 Google Scholar
[162]	Huang L, Feng Q, Han G Q, Li F G, Li X, Fang L W, Xing X Y, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2017 IEEE Photonics J. 9 6803708
[163]	Zhang K, Feng Q, Huang L, Hu Z Z, Feng Z Q, Li A, Zhou H, Lu X L, Zhang C F, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2018 IEEE Photonics J. 10 6802508
[164]	Feng Q, Li X, Han G, Huang L, Li F, Tang W, Zhang J, Hao Y 2017 Opt. Mater. Express 7 1240 Google Scholar
[165]	Xu Y, An Z Y, Zhang L X, Feng Q, Zhang J C, Zhang C F, Hao Y 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 2941 Google Scholar
[166]	Ahn S, Lin Y H, Ren F, Oh S, Jung Y, Yang G, Kim J, Mastro M A, Hite J K, Eddy C R, Pearton S J 2016 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 34 041213 Google Scholar
[167]	Ahn S, Ren F, Oh S, Jung Y, Kim J, Mastro M A, Hite J K, Eddy C R, Pearton S J 2016 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 34 041207 Google Scholar
[168]	Alema F, Hertog B, Ledyaev O, Volovik D, Thoma G, Miller R, Osinsky A, Mukhopadhyay P, Bakhshi S, Ali H, Schoenfeld W V 2017 Phys. Status Solidi A 1 1600688
[169]	Cui S, Mei Z, Zhang Y, Liang H, Du X 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 17 00454
[170]	Cui S J, Mei Z. X, Hou Y N, Chen Q S, Liang H L, Zhang Y H, Huo W X, Du X L 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 067301 Google Scholar
[171]	Lee S H, Kim S B, Moon Y J, Kim S M, Jung H J, Seo M S, Lee K M, Kim S K, Lee S W 2017 ACS Photonics 4 2937 Google Scholar
[172]	Chen X H, Xu Y, Zhou D, Yang S, Ren F F, Lu H, Tang K, Gu S L, Zhang R, Zheng Y D, Ye J D 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 36997 Google Scholar
[173]	Patil-Chaudhari D, Ombaba M, Oh J Y, Mao H, Montgomery K H, Lange A, Mahajan S, Woodall J M, Islam M S 2017 IEEE Photonics J. 9 2300207
[174]	Rafique S, Han L, Zhao H P 2017 Phys. Status Solidi A 214 1700063 Google Scholar
[175]	Pratiyush A S, Krishnamoorth S, Solanke S V, Xia Z B, Muralidharan R, Rajan S, Nath D N 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 221107 Google Scholar
[176]	Zhang D, Zheng W, Lin R C, Li T T, Zhang Z J, Huang F 2018 J. Alloys Compd. 735 150 Google Scholar
[177]	Lin R C, Zheng W, Zhang D, Zhang Z, Liao Q, Yang L, Huang F 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 22419 Google Scholar
[178]	Jaiswal P, Muazzam U U, Pratiyush A S, Mohan N, Raghavan S, Muralidharan R, Shivashankar S A, Nath D N 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 021105 Google Scholar
[179]	Chen Y C, Lu Y J, Lin C N, Tian Y Z, Gao C J, Dong L, Shan C X 2018 J. Mater. Chem. C 6 5727 Google Scholar
[180]	Arora K, Goel N, Kumar M, Kumar M 2018 ACS Photonics 5 2391 Google Scholar
[181]	Shen H, Yin Y, Tian K, Baskaran K, Duan L, Zhao X, Tiwari A 2018 J. Alloys Compd. 766 601 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 Ga₂O₃几个同分异构体的晶体结构

Fig. 1. Crystal structures of several isomers of Ga₂O₃

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 Ga₂O₃各同分异构体的相互转换关系^[4]

Fig. 2. Interconversion relation of Ga₂O₃ isomers^[4]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 β-Ga₂O₃的晶体结构及晶格常数^[21−23]

Fig. 3. Crystal structure and lattice constant of β-Ga₂O₃^[21−23]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 β-Ga₂O₃材料具有的物理性质及其对应的器件应用

Fig. 4. Physical properties and device applications of β-Ga₂O₃ material

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 (a)在不同温度下制备获得的Sn掺杂β-Ga₂O₃薄膜的透过率^[75]; (b) Sn掺杂β-Ga₂O₃薄膜的导电率随沉积温度的变化关系^[24]

Fig. 5. (a) The transmittance of Sn-doped-Ga₂O₃ thin films prepared at different temperatures^[75]; (b) the relationship between the conductivity of Sn doped -Ga₂O₃ thin films and the deposition temperature^[24]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 Sn掺杂Ga₂O₃薄膜的透过率和带隙(a)^[81]及电阻率(b)^[82]随Sn掺杂浓度的变化关系

Fig. 6. The relationship of the transmittance (a)^[81], the band gap (a)^[81], the resistivity (b)^[82] with Sn different doping concentration in Sn-doped Ga₂O₃ thin films

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 ITO与Ga₂O₃:ITO薄膜性能对比　(a)光输出功率–电流–电压特征曲线; (b)近紫外LED的电致发光光谱^[85]

Fig. 7. (a) Current versus light output power and forward voltage (L-I-V) characteristic curves and (b) typical electroluminescence spectra measured for near-ultraviolet LEDs with Ga₂O₃:ITO and ITO transparent conducting electrodes; the inset shows top-view SEM image of near-ultraviolet^[85]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 Au-Ga₂O₃纳米线-Au光电探测器　(a)黑暗情况下的I–V特性曲线及其器件结构SEM图(插图); (b)–8 V偏压下对254 nm光的I–t响应特性曲线^[91]

Fig. 8. Au-Ga₂O₃ nanowire-Au photodetector: (a) I-V characteristic curve of the detector in dark. The inset of is a typical SEM image of the device, the scale bar: 200 nm; (b) real-time photoresponse of the detector to 254 nm light^[91]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 β-Ga₂O₃纳米桥光电探测器的日盲光电性质　(a) 器件的结构示意图; (b) 50 V偏压下对254 nm光的I–t响应特性; (c) 黑暗及对365和254 nm光响应的I–V特性曲线; (d) 不同波长的光谱响应特性^[88]

Fig. 9. Solar blind photoelectric properties of photodetector based on the bridged β-Ga₂O₃ nanowires: (a) Schematic diagram of the devices; (b) time-dependent photoresponse of the bridged β-Ga₂O₃ nanowires measured in dry air under UVC (～2 mW cm^–2 at 254 nm) illumination with a period of 60 s at a bias voltage of 50 V; (c) I-V characteristics of the bridged β-Ga₂O₃ nanowires in dark (squares), under 365 nm light (triangles), and under 254 nm light (circles). The I-V curve measured under 254 nm light is plotted on a linear scale in the inset; (d) spectral response of the bridged β-Ga₂O₃ nanowires revealing that the device is blind to solar light. The dashed line indicates the lowest wavelength of the solar spectrum on Earth^[88]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 (a) Ga₂O₃纳米线光电探测器在不同偏压下的光谱响应^[92]; (b)在Cr/Au电极上生长获得的Ga₂O₃纳米线光电探测器结构^[93]; (c)不同温度下生长的Ga₂O₃纳米线对255 nm光的I–t响应曲线^[93]; (d)不同偏压下的光谱响应^[93]

Fig. 10. (a) Room-temperature spectral responses of the Ga₂O₃ nanowires photodetector measured with different applied biases^[92]; (b) Ga₂O₃ nanowire photodetector with Cr/Au as electrodes^[93]; (c) transit responses measured from the three fabricated photodetectors grown at different temperatures^[93]; (d) room-temperature spectral responses of the photodetector under different bias^[93]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 (a)单条Ga₂O₃纳米带光电探测器的SEM图^[94]; (b)不同带宽Ga₂O₃纳米带的光谱响应, 插图为探测器结构^[94]; (c) In掺杂的Ga₂O₃单条纳米带光电探测器的光谱响应^[95]; (d)纯Ga₂O₃和In:Ga₂O₃单条纳米带黑暗情况及在250 nm光照下的I–V曲线^[95]

Fig. 11. (a) SEM image of a Ga₂O₃ individual-nanobelt device^[94]; (b) spectral response of the devices (nanobelts with different widths of 800 nm and 1.6 mm) measured at a bias of 15 V. The schematic configuration of a photoconductive measurement is inserted in the top-right corner^[94]; (c) spectral response of an individual In-doped Ga₂O₃ nanobelt photodetector. The inset is a typical SEM image of an individual In-doped Ga₂O₃ nanobelt device^[95]; (d) logarithmic plot of I-V curves of the individual Ga₂O₃ and In-doped Ga₂O₃ nanobelt photodetector under illumination with the 250 nm wavelength light and in dark conditions^[95]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 (a) Ga₂O₃纳米花的SEM图; (b) Ga₂O₃纳米花对254 nm光的I–t响应曲线^[97]

Fig. 12. (a) SEM image of Ga₂O₃ nanoflowers; (b) I-t response curve of Ga₂O₃ nanoflowers to 254 nm light^[97]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 ZnO/Ga₂O₃核/壳结构的日盲紫外探测器　(a)器件示意图; (b)黑暗和254 nm光照下的I–V特征曲线; (c)–6 V偏压下的光谱响应^[100]; (d)0 V偏压下的光谱响应; (e)光电流衰减^[101]. Au/Ga₂O₃纳米线Schottky型垂直结构的光电探测器 (f)器件示意图; (g)光谱响应; (h)光电流衰减^[102]

Fig. 13. Solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on Single ZnO-Ga₂O₃ core-shell microwire ZnO/Ga₂O₃ core-shell: (a) Device schematic diagram; (b)I-V characteristic curve in dark and under 254 nm light; (c) spectral response of the device at −6 V bias^[100]; (d) the photoresponse spectrum of the device at 0 V; (e) the time response under the excitation of 266 nm pulse laser at 0 V^[101]. Au/Ga₂O₃ nanowire Schottky vertical structure photodetector: (f) device schematic diagram; (g) spectral responses of the device at zero bias and under reverse bias of 10 V. Inset shows the responsivity of photodetectors at the wavelength of 254 nm as a function of reverse bias; (h) decay edge of the current response at reverse bias of 10 V^[102].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 基于β-Ga₂O₃薄片的日盲紫外探测器　(a)机械剥离获得β-Ga₂O₃微米薄片及器件制作流程示意图; (b)器件的光学照片; (c)不同波长光照下的器件的I–t响应曲线; (d) 光谱响应曲线^[103]; (e) β-Ga₂O₃微米薄片的反应离子刻蚀减薄^[104]; (f) Ni/Au电极与β-Ga₂O₃薄片构成的MSM结构肖特基结日盲紫外探测器在不用波长下的I–V曲线; (g)能带结构示意图^[105]; (h), (i)石墨烯电极与β-Ga₂O₃薄片构成的MSM结构日盲紫外探测器的SEM图^[106]

Fig. 14. Solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on β-Ga₂O₃ flake: (a) Schematic of the entire exfoliated β-Ga₂O₃ flake based photodetector fabrication process; (b) optical image of the fabricated photodetector; (c) time-dependent photoresponse of the fabricated photodetector under various illumination conditions (254, 365, 532 and 650 nm light exposure); (d) responsivity as a function of wavelength^[103]; (e) the reactive ion etching assisted thinning of a β-Ga₂O₃ flake^[104]; (f) the I-V curve; (g) energy band structure diagram of the schottky junction MSM structure solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on Ni/Au electrodes and β-Ga₂O₃ flake under different wavelengths^[105]; (h), (i) the SEM image of the MSM structure solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on graphene electrode and β-Ga₂O₃ flake^[106]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 垂直结构肖特基型β-Ga₂O₃单晶日盲紫外探测器　(a)制作过程^[109]; (b)光谱响应^[109]; (c)实物图^[89]; (d)瞬态光响应^[89]

Fig. 15. Vertical solar-blind deep-ultraviolet schottky photodetectors based onβ-Ga₂O₃ substrates: (a) Fabrication process for photodetector^[109]; (b) spectral responser^[109]; (c) photograph of the flame detector. The dashed circles are on the edges of the transparent electrodes^[89]; (d) transient response of the detector^[89]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 (a) β-Ga₂O₃单晶与Au电极在不同温度下退火后的I–V曲线^[110]; (b)未退火和400℃下退火后Au/β-Ga₂O₃单晶肖特基型光电探测器的光谱响应^[110]; (c)在β-Ga₂O₃单晶上采用溶胶凝胶法制备高绝缘β-Ga₂O₃薄膜并与Au电极构成的光电探测器^[111]; (d)有无高绝缘β-Ga₂O₃薄膜层的光谱响应对比图^[111]

Fig. 16. (a) Dark I-V characteristics of the Au-Ga₂O₃ Schottky photodiode annealed at various temperatures. The inset shows the device configuration^[110]; (b) spectral response of the Au-Ga₂O₃ Schottky photodiode before and after annealing at 400℃. The inset shows the reverse I-V characteristics of the photodiode annealed at 400℃ taken in dark and under illumination with 240 nm light^[110]; (c) schematic structure of a photodiode composed of a Au Schottky contact and a β-Ga₂O₃ single-crystal substrate with a sol-gel prepared cap layer.^[111]; (d) spectral response of Ga₂O₃ photodiodes with and without a cap layer at reverse and forward biases of 3 V. The inset shows the incident light intensity dependence of the photocurrent at forward and reverse biases of 3 V under illumination with 250 nm light^[111]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 石墨烯/β-Ga₂O₃单晶日盲紫外探测器^[112]　(a)器件结构示意图; (b)黑暗及365 nm光照下的I–V曲线; (c)光谱响应; (d)能带结构示意图

Fig. 17. Solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors based on graphene/β-Ga₂O₃ single crystal heterojunction^[112]: (a) Schematic diagram of device structure; (b) I-V characteristics of the photodetectors in dark and under 365 nm light irradiation; (c) normalized spectral selectivity; (b) energy band diagram at forward bias voltage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 (a) Ga₂O₃薄膜的面内XRD图; (b) Ga₂O₃薄膜在黑暗及不同光照下的I–V曲线^[90]

Fig. 18. (a) In-plane XRD measurement results for the Ga₂O₃ film; (b) I-V characteristics of the Ga₂O₃ film photodetector in the dark, under black light irradiation, and under low-pressure mercury lamp irradiation^[90]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 (a) Ga₂O₃/GaN光电探测器结构; (b) Ga₂O₃/GaN光电探测器在不同偏压下的光谱响应^[117]; (c) Ga₂O₃/AlGaN/GaN光电探测器结构; (d) Ga₂O₃/AlGaN/GaN光电探测器在不同偏压下的光谱响应^[118]; (e) Ga₂O₃/InGaN/GaN光电探测器结构; (f) Ga₂O₃/InGaN/GaN光电探测器在不同偏压下的光谱响应^[119]; (g)有无Au纳米颗粒与Ga₂O₃界面形成的能带结构示意图; (h) Au纳米颗粒/Ga₂O₃光电探测器在不同偏压下的光谱响应^[120]

Fig. 19. Schematic diagram (a) and spectral responses under different bias (b) of Ga₂O₃/GaN photodetector^[117]; Schematic diagram (c) and spectral responses under different bias (d) of Ga₂O₃/AlGaN/GaN photodetector^[118]; Schematic diagram (e) and spectral responses under different bias (f) of Ga₂O₃/InGaN/GaN photodetector^[119]; Energy band diagram of area near the surface of β-Ga₂O₃ and Au in the dark (g), spectral responses under different bias of Ga₂O₃/GaN-based metal-semiconductor-metal photodetectors covered with Au nanoparticles (h)^[120]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 (a) Ga₂O₃/SiC光电探测器结构; (b) Ga₂O₃/SiC光电探测器在2 V反偏压下的光谱响应^[121]

Fig. 20. Schematic diagram (a) and spectral responses under 2 V reverse bias (b) of SiC/Ga₂O₃ photodetector^[121]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 21 (a) Ga₂O₃薄膜MSM结构日盲紫外探测器的结构示意图^[123]; (b) MSM结构中Ga₂O₃薄膜厚度对探测器光暗比的影响^[124]; (c), (d) MSM结构阵列探测器^[125]; (e)氧气氛退火处理构成的肖特基结与未退火欧姆接触MSM结构探测器的I–t曲线^[126]. 不同元素掺杂Ga₂O₃薄膜MSM结构探测器的I–t曲线 (f) Mg掺杂^[128]; (g) Mn掺杂^[127]; (h) Zn掺杂^[129]; (i) Sn掺杂^[130]

Fig. 21. (a) Schematic diagram of the β-Ga₂O₃ thin film MSM structure photodetector^[123; (b) the effect of Ga₂O₃ film thickness on light-dark ratio of the MSM structure photodetector^[124]; (c), (d) MSM structure arrays photodetector^[125]; (e)I-t curves of the β-Ga₂O₃ thin films MSM structure photodetector with unannealed (Ohmic-type up) and annealed treatment in O₂ atmosphere (Schottky-type, down), respectively^[126]. I-t curves of the MSM structure photodetector based on β-Ga₂O₃ thin films doped with different element: (f) Mg doped^[128]; (g) Mn doped^[127]; (h) Zn doped^[129]; (i) Sn doped^[130]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 22 石墨烯/Ga₂O₃/石墨烯垂直结构日盲紫外探测器的结构示意图^[138](a)及其不同偏压下对254 nm紫外光的响应度(b)^[138]; 纯Ga₂O₃及表面附着有Au纳米颗粒Ga₂O₃薄膜的紫外可见吸收(c)^[139]和不同光照下的I–V曲线(d)^[139]; 引入Al₂O₃薄层生长获得的Ga₂O₃薄膜/纳米线SEM图(e)^[140]和不同光照下的I–V曲线(f)^[140]

Fig. 22. Schematic diagram (a) ^[138] and photoresponses to 254 nm ultraviolet light under different bias (b) ^[138] of graphene/Ga₂O₃/graphene vertical structure photodetector; UV-vis absorbance spectrum (c) ^[139] and I-V cures under the different wavelength light illumination (d) ^[139] of the bare Ga₂O₃ thin film and Au nanoparticles/Ga₂O₃ composite thin film; SEM image (e) and I-V cures under the different wavelength light illumination (f) ^[140] of Ga₂O₃ thin film/nanowire grown induced by Al₂O₃ thin layer^[140]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 23 Ga₂O₃/NSTO异质结自供电探测器的结构示意图(a)^[142] 、黑暗及254 nm不同光强下的I–V曲线(b)^[142]和异质结界面处光生载流子输运的能带结构示意图(c)^[142]; Ga₂O₃/P-Si PN结探测器的结构示意图(d)^[143]; Ga₂O₃/Ga:ZnO异质结探测器的整流特性及结构示意图(e)^[145]和光谱响应(f)^[145]; Ga₂O₃/GaN PN结探测器的结构示意图(g)^[146]和黑暗及不同波长光照下的I–V曲线(h)^[146]; Sn:Ga₂O₃/GaN PN结探测器的光谱响应(i)^[144]和不同波长光照下的I–t曲线(j)^[147]; Ga₂O₃/SiC/P-Si PIN结(k)^[148]和石墨烯/Ga₂O₃/SiC探测器的结构示意图(l)^[149]

Fig. 23. Schematic diagram (a) ^[142], I-V cures in dark and under 254 nm with different light intensity illumination (b) ^[142], and schematic energy band diagrams (c) ^[142] of the β-Ga₂O₃/NSTO heterojunction self-powered photodetector; Schematic diagram of Ga₂O₃/P-Si PN junction detector (d) ^[143]; Rectifier features (e), schematic diagram (e) and spectral response (f) of the Ga₂O₃/Ga:ZnO heterojunction photodetector^[145]; Schematic diagram (g) ^[145], I-V cures in dark and under the different wavelength light illumination (h) ^[146]; Spectral response (i) and I-t cures under the different wavelength light illumination (j) of the Sn:Ga₂O₃/GaN PN junction photodetector^[145]; Schematic diagram of Ga₂O₃/SiC/P-Si PIN junction photodetector (k) ^[148]and graphene/Ga₂O₃/SiC photodetector (l)^[149]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 24 a-GaO_x非晶薄膜和β-Ga₂O₃薄膜日盲紫外探测器^[159]　(a) MSM结构示意图; (b)光谱响应; (c)能带结构示意图

Fig. 24. Solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on a-GaO_x amorphous film and β-Ga₂O₃ film^[159]: (a) MSM structure diagram; (b) spectral response; (c) energy band structure diagram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 25 MSM结构日盲紫外探测器　(a) MSM结构示意图^[160]; (b) Ga₂O₃单晶和薄膜的光谱响应对比^[160]; (c) MSM结构^[162]; (d) Ga₂O₃薄膜不同气氛退火的光谱响应对比^[161]; (e)不同氧压下生长的Ga₂O₃薄膜的光谱响应对比^[162]; (f)不同In掺杂的Ga₂O₃薄膜的光谱响应对比图^[163]

Fig. 25. MSM structure solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector: (a) Schematic diagram of MSM structure^[160]; (b) spectral response comparison of Ga₂O₃ single crystal and thin film^[160]; (c) MSM structure^[162]; (d) spectral response comparison of Ga₂O₃ thin films annealed in different atmospheres^[161]; (e) spectral response comparison of Ga₂O₃ thin films grown under different oxygen pressures^[162]; (f) spectral response comparison of Ga₂O₃ thin films doped with different concentrations of In elements^[163]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 26 a-Ga₂O₃非晶薄膜日盲紫外探测器^[169]　(a)以石英为衬底的器件结构示意图; (b)光谱响应; (c)光衰减测试; (d)以柔性为衬底的器件结构示意图

Fig. 26. Solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on a-Ga₂O₃ amorphous film^[169]: (a) Schematic diagram of device structure with quartz substrate; (b) spectral response; (c) the decay of photoresponse; (d) schematic diagram of device structure with flexible substrate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 27 a-GaO_x非晶薄膜日盲紫外探测器^[171]　(a)以玻璃为衬底的器件结构示意图; (b)黑暗和253 nm光照下的I–V曲线; 以聚酰亚胺为衬底的器件结构示意图(c)及黑暗和253 nm光照下的I–V曲线(d)

Fig. 27. Solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on a-Ga₂O₃ amorphous film^[171]: Schematic diagram of device structure with glass substrate (a) and I-V cures in dark and under the illumination of 253 nm light (b); Schematic diagram of device structure with polyimide substrate (c) and I-V cures in dark and under the illumination of 253 nm light (d)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 28 α-Ga₂O₃/ZnO异质结日盲紫外探测器^[172]　(a)光谱响应; (b)增益随偏压的变化; (c)瞬态光响应特性; (d)能带结构及器件结构示意图

Fig. 28. Solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on α-Ga₂O₃/ZnO heterojunction^[172] : (a) Spectral response; (b) variation of gain with bias; (c) transient photoresponse characteristics; (d) schematic diagram of energy band structure and device structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 29 以N₂O为反应气体获得的β-Ga₂O₃薄膜日盲紫外探测器　(a)生长原理示意图^[176]; (b)黑暗和255 nm光照下的I–V曲线及MSM结构示意图^[176]; (c)光谱响应及不同偏压下的光响应度^[176]; (d)石墨烯/β-Ga₂O₃/GaN器件结构示意图^[177]; (e)光谱响应^[177]; (f)能带结构示意图^[177]

Fig. 29. Solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on β-Ga₂O₃ thin film grown using N₂O as the reaction gas: (a) Schematic diagram of growth principle^[176]; (b) I-V cures in dark and under 255 nm light illumination, and schematic diagram of MSM structure^[176]; (c) spectral response and photoresponsivity under different bias^[176]; (d) schematic diagram of graphene/β-Ga₂O₃/GaN devices^[177]; (e) spectral response^[177]; (f) energy band structure diagram^[177]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 β-Ga₂O₃与主流半导体材料的基本物性比较^[25]

Table 1. Comparison of basic physical properties of β-Ga₂O₃ with mainstream semiconductor materials^[25]

材料	Si	GaAs	GaP	4H-SiC	ZnO	GaN	ß-Ga₂O₃	Diamond	AlN	MgO
带隙E_g/eV	1.1	1.43	2.27	3.3	3.35	3.4	4.2—4.9	5.5	6.2	7.8
迁移率${\text{μ}}$/cm²·Vs^–1	1400	8500	350	1000	200	1200	300	2000	135
击穿电场强度E_b/MV·cm^–1	0.3	0.6	1.0	2.5		3.3	8	10	2
相对介电常数ε	11.8	12.9	11.1	9.7	8.7	9	10	5.5	8.5	9.9
导热率/W·cm^–1·K^–1	1.5	0.55	1.1	2.7	0.6	2.1	0.23[010] 0.13[100]	10	3.2
巴利加优值/$\varepsilon {\text{μ}} {E_{\rm{b}}}^3$	1	15		340		870	3444	24664

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 Ga₂O₃基透明导电电极薄膜的各参数指标汇总

Table 2. Parameters and indicators of Ga₂O₃-based transparent conductive electrode films

薄膜类型	电导率/S·cm^–1	面电阻/Ω·sq^–1	载流子浓度/cm^–3	迁移率/cm²·V^–1·s^–1	透过率/%	参考文献
Ga₂O₃薄膜	7.6	-	-	-	85	[80]
Sn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	1	-	1.4 × 1019	0.44	80	[78]
Sn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	8.2	-	-	< 0.44	80	[24]
Sn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	8.3	-	-	12.03	85	[81]
Sn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	32.3	-	2.4 × 1020	0.74	88	[82]
Sn:Ga₂O₃单晶	23.4	-	2.3 × 1018	64.7	85	[79]
(Ga, In)₂O₃薄膜	1.72 × 103	-	5 × 1020	-	> 95	[83]
Ga₂O₃/ITO薄膜	-	164	-	-	> 94	[84]
Ga₂O₃/ITO薄膜	-	49	-	-	93.8	[85]
Ag/Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	42	-	-	91	[86]
Ga₂O₃/Cu/ITO	-	50	-	-	86	[87]

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 几种无线通信的比较

Table 3. Comparison of several wireless communications

通信类别	非视距通信	抗干扰、防窃听	相对运动信号接收	传播距离调控	受环境气候时间影响
无线电通信	是	易被干扰和窃听	是	很差	受环境影响
激光通信	否	抗干扰、防窃听	否	较差	受环境影响
红外通信	否	较易干扰、防窃听	否	较差	受环境时间影响
紫外通信	是	抗干扰、防窃听	是	很好	很小、全天候

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 Ga₂O₃基日盲紫外探测器的各参数指标汇总

Table 4. Summary of parameters and indicators of Ga₂O₃ based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector.

光电探测器类型	光响应度/A·W^–1	量子效率/%	暗电流/A	光暗比	响应时间/s	参考文献
Ga₂O₃纳米线	-	-	10^–12	≈ 2 × 10³	2.2 × 10^–1	[91]
Ga₂O₃纳米线	-	-	< 10^–12	3 × 10⁴	< 2 × 10^–2	[88]
Ga₂O₃纳米线	8.0 × 10^–4	0.39	2.4 × 10^–10	≈ 10²	-	[92]
Ga₂O₃纳米线	3.4 × 10^–3	1.37	-	≈ 10²	-	[93]
ZnO/Ga₂O₃核壳微米线	1.3 × 10³(–6 V)	-	10^–10	≈ 10⁶	2 × 10^–5	[100]
ZnO/Ga₂O₃核壳微米线	9.7 × 10^–3(0 V)	-	10^–10	≈ 7 × 10²	10^–4	[101]
Ga₂O₃纳米线	6 × 10^–4	-	10^–11	≈ 10²	6.4 × 10^–5	[102]
Ga₂O₃纳米线	3.77 × 10²	2.0 × 10⁵	10^–11	10³	0.21	[107]
石墨烯/Ga₂O₃纳米线	1.85 × 10^-¹	-	10^–5	-	8 × 10^–3	[108]
Ga₂O₃纳米片	3.3	1.6 × 10³	10^–9	10	3 × 10^–2	[96]
Ga₂O₃纳米花(γ)	-	-	10^–9	2.2 × 10²	10^–1	[97]
Ga₂O₃纳米带	3.37 × 10¹	1.67 × 10⁴	10^–13	4.0 × 10²	8.6 × 10¹	[94]
Ga₂O₃纳米带	8.51 × 10²	4.2 × 10³	10^–13	≈ 10³	< 3 × 10^–1	[98]
Ga₂O₃纳米带	1.93 × 10¹	9.4 × 10³	10^–10	≈ 10⁴	< 2 × 10^–2	[99]
In:Ga₂O₃纳米带	5.47 × 10²	2.72 × 10⁵	10^–13	9.1 × 10²	1	[95]
Ga₂O₃微米带	1.8 × 10⁵(–30 V)	8.8 × 10⁵	10^–6	2.57	0.67	[103]
Ga₂O₃微米带	-	-	10^–4	-	1.4	[104]
Ga₂O₃微米带	1.68	-	10^–13	1.9 × 10³	0.53	[105]
石墨烯/Ga₂O₃微米带	2.98 × 10¹	-	10^–13	≈ 10⁴	-	[106]
Ga₂O₃单晶	2.6—8.7	-	10^–10	≈ 10³	-	[109]
Ga₂O₃单晶	3.7 × 10^–2	1.8 × 10¹	10^–10	1.5 × 10⁴	9 × 10^–3	[89]
Ga₂O₃单晶	10³	-	10^–10	≈ 10⁶	-	[110]
Ga₂O₃单晶	4.3	2.1 × 10¹	10^–11	10⁵	-	[111]
石墨烯/Ga₂O₃单晶	3.93 × 10¹	1.96 × 10⁴	10^–6	10³	2.2 × 10²	[112]
Ga₂O₃单晶	5 × 10^–2	-	10^–5	10²	2.4 × 10^–1	[160]
Ga₂O₃单晶	3 × 10^–3	-	10^–8	10¹	1.4 × 10^–1	[113]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	8 × 10^–5	-	-	-	-	[116]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	3.7 × 10^–2	1.8 × 10¹	10^–9	-	-	[90]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	4.53 × 10^–1	> 10²	10^–10	10⁵	-	[117]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	≈ 10¹	-	10^–10	10³	-	[118]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	≈ 10¹	-	10^–7	10³	-	[119]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	≈ 10²	-	10^–10	10²	-	[120]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	-	10^–11	10⁵	-	[122]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	7.6 × 10^–1	-	10^–10	6	5 × 10^–2	[152]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	1.7 × 10¹	8.2 × 10³	10^–9	8.5 × 10⁶	-	[153]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	-	10^–11	10²	8 × 10^–1	[154]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	9.03 × 10^–1	-	10^–11	10⁵	-	[155]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	2.59 × 10²	7.9 × 10⁴	10^–10	10⁴	4 × 10^–1	[156]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	-	10^–7	15	-	[157]
Ga₂O₃薄膜/晶体	1.8	8.7 × 10²	10^–6	36.9	-	[158]
a-GaO_x非晶薄膜	7.0 × 10¹	-	10^–10	1.2 × 10⁵	2 × 10^–2	[159]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	4.2	-	10^–11	1.6 × 10⁴	4 × 10^–2	[159]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	9 × 10^–3	-	10^–5	10¹	1.8 × 10^–1	[160]
Al:Ga₂O₃薄膜	1.5	7.8 × 10²	-	-	-	[164]
Si:Ga₂O₃薄膜	6 × 10¹	3 × 10⁴	-	9	-	[166]
Si:Ga₂O₃薄膜	3.6 × 10¹	1.75 × 10⁴	-	9	-	[167]
Zn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	2.1 × 10²	-	10^–11	5 × 10⁴	1.4	[168]
Ga₂O₃非晶薄膜	1.9 × 10^–1	-	10^–12	10⁶	1.9 × 10^–5	[169]
Ga₂O₃非晶薄膜	4.5 × 10¹	-	10^–10	10⁴	2.97 × 10^–6	[171]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	1.5	-	10^–9	10³	-	[175]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	0.29	1.34	10^–8	1.6 × 10³	0.1	[173]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	0.11	-	10^–9	3.5 × 10³	0.45	[174]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	0.14	-	10^–11	1.4 × 10⁶	0.2	[174]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	1.5	-	10^–8	10³	-	[173]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	2.6 × 10¹	-	10^–8	10⁴	0.18	[176]
石墨烯/Ga₂O₃薄膜	1.28 × 10¹	-	10^–8	-	2 × 10^–3	[177]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	9.6 × 10¹	4.76 × 10⁴	10^–6	-	-	[180]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	5.86 × 10^–5	-	10^–9	1.8 × 10¹	0.1	[181]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	1.5 × 10²	7 × 10⁴	10^–11	10⁵	1.3	[165]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	1 × 10^–1	-	10^–8	-	-	[178]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	-	10^–8	6	8.6 × 10^–1	[123]
Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	-	10^–9	1.3 × 10¹	6.2 × 10^–1	[126]
Ga₂O₃/Ga/Ga₂O₃薄膜	2.854	-	10^–11	8 × 10⁵	-	[170]
Mn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	7 × 10^–2	3.6 × 10¹	10^–9	6.7 × 10¹	2.8 × 10^–1	[127]
α-Ga₂O₃薄膜	1.5 × 10^–2	7.39	10^–9	3 × 10¹	-	[137]
α-Sn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	9.6 × 10^–2	-	10^–9	1.4 × 10²	1.08	[132]
α-Sn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	-	10^–7	4	8.73	[131]
ε-Sn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	6.05 × 10^–3	3.02	10^–9	46.46	-	[133]
β-Sn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	3.61 × 10^–2	-	10^–8	19	1.37	[166]
Zn:Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	-	10^–9	2	1.23	[134]
Er:Ga₂O₃薄膜	-	-	10^–9	2.5	1.6 × 10^–1	[76]
Au NPs/Ga₂O₃薄膜	10²	-	10^–6	> 2 × 10²	-	[139]
Ga₂O₃/p-Si异质结	3.7 × 10²	1.8 × 10⁵	10^–8	9.4 × 10²	1.8	[143]
Ga₂O₃/ZnO异质结	3.5 × 10^–1	1.7 × 10²	10^–10	1.5 × 10¹	6.2 × 10^–1	[144]
Ga₂O₃/NSTO异质结	4.3 × 10¹	2.1 × 10⁴	10^–6	2 × 10¹	7 × 10^–2	[142]
Ga₂O₃/Ga:ZnO异质结	7.6 × 10^–4	-	10^–9	2.6 × 10²	2.7 × 10^–1	[145]
p-Si/i-SiC/n-Ga₂O₃	-	-	10^–8	5.4 × 10³	-	[148]
石墨烯/Ga₂O₃/SiC	1.8 × 10^–1	-	10^–5	6.3 × 10¹	1.7	[149]
石墨烯/Ga₂O₃/石墨烯	9.66	-	10^–9	8.3 × 10¹	0.96	[138]
Ga₂O₃/SiC/Al₂O₃	-	-	10^–9	7.7	-	[141]
Ga₂O₃/Al₂O₃	1.4	-	10^–7	9.04	1.26	[140]
Ga₂O₃/SiC异质结	7 × 10^–2	-	10^–10	-	9 × 10^–3	[121]
Ga₂O₃/GaN异质结	5.4 × 10^–2	-	10^–6	1.5 × 10²	8 × 10^–2	[146]
Sn:Ga₂O₃/GaN异质结	3.05	-	10^–11	10⁴	1.8 × 10^–2	[147]
α-Ga₂O₃/ZnO异质结	1.1 × 10⁴(–40 V)	-	10^–12	-	2.4 × 10^–4	[172]
Ga₂O₃/金刚石异质结	2 × 10^–4	-	10^–9	3.7 × 10¹	-	[179]

下载: 导出CSV

[1]	程轶 2013 博士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学) Cheng Y 2013 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)
[2]	马海林, 苏庆 2014 物理学报 63 116701 Google Scholar Ma H L, Su Q 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 116701 Google Scholar
[3]	潘惠平, 成枫锋, 李琳, 洪瑞华, 姚淑德 2013 物理学报 62 048801 Google Scholar Pan H P, Cheng F F, Li L, Hong R H, Yao S D 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 048801 Google Scholar
[4]	Roy R, Hill V G, Osborn E F 1952 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74 719 Google Scholar
[5]	Kaneko K, Nomura T, Kakeya I, Fujita S 2009 Appl. Phys. Express 2 075501 Google Scholar
[6]	Fujita S, Kaneko K 2014 J. Cryst. Growth 401 588 Google Scholar
[7]	Shinohara D, Fujita S 2008 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47 7311 Google Scholar
[8]	Schewski R, Wagner G, Baldini M, Gogova D, Galazka Z, Schulz T, Remmele T, Markurt T, Wenckstern H V, Grundmann M, Bierwagen O, Vogt P, Albrecht M 2015 Appl. Phys. Express 8 011101 Google Scholar
[9]	Lee S D, Akaiwa K, Fujita S 2013 Phys. Status Solidi C 10 1592 Google Scholar
[10]	Lee S D, Ito Y, Kaneko K, Fujita S 2015 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54 030301 Google Scholar
[11]	Kaneko K, Nomura T, Fujita S 2010 Phys. Status Solidi C 7 2467 Google Scholar
[12]	Kaneko K, Kakeya I, Komori S, Fujita S 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 233901 Google Scholar
[13]	Mitome M, Kohiki S, Nagai T, Kurashima K, Kimoto K, Bando Y 2013 Cryst. Growth Des. 13 3577 Google Scholar
[14]	Wang T, Farvid S S, Abulikemu M, Radovanovic P V 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 9250 Google Scholar
[15]	Playford H Y, Hannon A C, Tucker M G, Dawson D M, Ashbrook S E, Kastiban R J, Sloan J, Walton R I 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 16188 Google Scholar
[16]	Lorenzi R, Paleari A, Golubev N V, Ignat'eva E S, Sigaev V N, Niederberger M, Lauria A 2015 J. Mater. Chem. C 3 41 Google Scholar
[17]	Takahashi M, Nakatani T, Iwamoto S, Watanabe T, Inoue M 2006 J. Phys. Condens Matter 18 5745 Google Scholar
[18]	Oshima Y, Víllora E G, Matsushita Y, Yamamoto S, Shimamura K 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 118 085301 Google Scholar
[19]	Ge S X, Zheng Z 2009 Solid State Sci. 11 1592 Google Scholar
[20]	Tsuchiya T, Yusa H, Tsuchiya J 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 174108 Google Scholar
[21]	Bermudez V M 2006 Chem. Phys. 323 193 Google Scholar
[22]	Yamaga M, Víllora E G, Shimamura K, Ichinose N, Honda M 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 155207 Google Scholar
[23]	Zacherle T, Schmidt P C, Martin M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 235206 Google Scholar
[24]	Orita M, Hiramatsu H, Ohta H, Hirano M, Hosono H 2002 Thin Solid Films 411 134 Google Scholar
[25]	Higashiwaki M, Sasaki K, Kuramata A, Masui T, Yamakoshi S 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 013504 Google Scholar
[26]	Dong L, Jia R, Xin B, Zhang Y 2016 J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 34 060602
[27]	Dong L, Jia R, Xin B, Peng B, Zhang Y 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 40160 Google Scholar
[28]	Tao X T 2019 J. Semicond. 40 010401 Google Scholar
[29]	Fu B, Jia Z T, Mu W X, Yin Y R, Zhang J, Tao X T 2019 J. Semicond. 40 011804 Google Scholar
[30]	Mohamed H F, Xia C T, Sai Q L, Cui H Y, Pan M Y, Qi H J 2019 J. Semicond. 40 011801 Google Scholar
[31]	Higashiwaki M, Sasaki K, Murakami H, Kumagai Y, Koukitu A, Kuramata A, Masui T, Yamakoshi S 2016 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 31 034001 Google Scholar
[32]	Razeghi M 2002 Proc. IEEE 90 1006 Google Scholar
[33]	Du X, Mei Z, Liu Z, Guo Y, Zhang T, Hou Y, Zhang Z, Xue Q, Kuznetsov A Y 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 4625 Google Scholar
[34]	Higashiwaki M, Sasaki K, Kuramata A, Masui T, Yamakoshi S 2014 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 21 Google Scholar
[35]	Higashiwaki M, Jessen G H 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 060401 Google Scholar
[36]	Villora E G, Arjoca S, Shimamura K, Inomata D, Aoki K 2014 Proc. of SPIE 8987 1
[37]	Wellenius P, Suresh A, Foreman J V, Everitt H O, Muth J F 2008 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 146 252 Google Scholar
[38]	Wellenius P, Suresh A, Muth J F 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 021111 Google Scholar
[39]	Vanithakumari S C, Nanda K K 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 3581 Google Scholar
[40]	Lin C F, Chen K T, Huang K P 2010 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 31 1431 Google Scholar
[41]	Choi S E, Oh Y T, Ham H K, Kim T W, Heo G S, Park J W, Choi B H, Shin D C 2011 Curr. Appl. Phys. 11 S255
[42]	Iizuka K, Morishima Y, Kuramata A, Shen Y J, Tsai C Y, Su Y Y, Liu G, Hsu T C, Yeh J H 2015 Proc. of SPIE 9363 1
[43]	Schwebel T, Fleischer M, Meixner H, Kohl C D 1998 Sens. Actuators B 49 46 Google Scholar
[44]	Kohl D, Ochs T, Geyer W, Fleischer M, Meixner H 1999 Sens. Actuators B 59 140 Google Scholar
[45]	Ogita M, Saika N, Nakanishi Y, Hatanaka Y 1999 Appl. Surf. Sci. 142 188 Google Scholar
[46]	Schwebel T, Fleischer M, Meixner H 2000 Sens. Actuators B 65 176 Google Scholar
[47]	Baban C, Toyoda Y, Ogita M 2005 Thin Solid Films 484 369 Google Scholar
[48]	Bartic M, Toyoda Y, Baban C I, Ogita M 2006 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part1 45 5186 Google Scholar
[49]	Feng P, Xue X Y, Liu Y G, Wan Q, Wang T H 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 112114 Google Scholar
[50]	Bartic M, Baban C I, Suzuki H, Ogita M, Isai M 2007 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 2879 Google Scholar
[51]	Liu Z F, Yamazaki T, Shen Y, Kikuta T, Nakatani N, Li Y 2008 Sens. Actuators B 129 666 Google Scholar
[52]	Arnold S P, Prokes S M, Perkins F K, Zaghloul M E 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 103102 Google Scholar
[53]	Lee C T, Yan J T 2010 Sens. Actuators B 147 723 Google Scholar
[54]	Hou Y, Jayatissa A H 2014 Sens. Actuators B 204 310 Google Scholar
[55]	Bartic M 2015 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 40
[56]	Hayashi H, Huang R, Ikeno H, Oba F, Yoshioka S, Tanaka I, Sonoda S 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 181903 Google Scholar
[57]	Pei G, Xia C, Dong Y, Wu B, Wang T, Xu J 2008 Scr. Mater. 58 943 Google Scholar
[58]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, An Y H, Li X J, Guo X C, Chu X L, Sun C L, Lei M, Li L H, Cao L X, Li P G, Tang W H 2015 J. Mater. Chem. C 3 1830 Google Scholar
[59]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, Li P G, Wang Q J, Lei M, Li L H, Tang W H 2015 RSC Adv. 5 12894 Google Scholar
[60]	Guo D Y, An Y H, Cui W, Zhi Y S, Zhao X L, Lei M, Li L H, Li P G, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 25166 Google Scholar
[61]	Gao X, Xia Y, Ji J, Xu H, Su Y, Li H, Yang C, Guo H, Yin J, Liu Z 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 193501 Google Scholar
[62]	Yang J B, Chang T C, Huang J J, Chen S C, Yang P C, Chen Y T, Tseng H C, Sze S M, Chu A K, Tsai M J 2013 Thin Solid Films 529 200 Google Scholar
[63]	Aoki Y, Wiemann C, Feyer V, Kim H S, Schneider C M, Ill-Yoo H, Martin M 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 3473 Google Scholar
[64]	Hsu C W, Chou L J 2012 Nano Lett. 12 4247 Google Scholar
[65]	Lee D Y, Tseng T Y 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 114117 Google Scholar
[66]	Huang J J, Chang T C, Yang J B, Chen S C, Yang P C, Chen Y T, Tseng H C, Sze S M, Chu A K, Tsai M J 2012 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33 1387 Google Scholar
[67]	Yang J B, Chang T C, Huang J J, Chen Y T, Yang P C, Tseng H C, Chu A K, Sze S M, Tsai M J 2013 Thin Solid Films 528 26 Google Scholar
[68]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, An Y H, Li P G, Wang P C, Chu X L, Guo X C, Zhi Y S, Lei M, Li L H, Tang W H 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 042105 Google Scholar
[69]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, Zhang L J, Yang T, Hu Q R, Lei M, Li P G, Li L H, Tang W H 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 032104 Google Scholar
[70]	Guo D Y, Qian Y P, Su Y L, Shi H Z, Li P G, Wu J T, Wang S L, Cui C, Tang W H 2017 AIP Adv. 7 065312 Google Scholar
[71]	Wang P C, Li P G, Zhi Y S, Guo D Y, Pan A Q, Zhan J M, Liu H, Shen J Q, Tang W H 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 262110 Google Scholar
[72]	Gollakota P, Dhawan A, Wellenius P, Lunardi L M, Muth J F, Saripalli Y N 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 221906 Google Scholar
[73]	Sawada K, Adachi S 2014 ECS J. Solid State Sci. 3 R238 Google Scholar
[74]	Kang B K, Mang S R, Lim H D, Song K M, Song Y H, Go D H, Jung M K, Senthil K, Yoon D H 2014 Mater. Chem. Phys. 147 178 Google Scholar
[75]	Wu Z, Bai G, Hu Q, Guo D, Sun C, Ji L, Lei M, Li L, Li P, Hao J, Tang W 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 171910 Google Scholar
[76]	Wu Z, Bai G, Qu Y, Guo D, Li L, Li P, Hao J, Tang W 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 211903 Google Scholar
[77]	Li W, Peng Y, Wang C, Zhao X, Zhi Y, Yan H, Li L, Li P, Yang H, Wu Z, Tang W 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 697 388 Google Scholar
[78]	Orita M, Ohta H, Hirano M, Hosono H 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 4166 Google Scholar
[79]	Suzuki N, Ohira S, Tanaka M, Sugawara T, Nakajima K, Shishido T 2007 Phys. Status Solidi C 4 2310 Google Scholar
[80]	Ou S L, Wuu D S, Fu Y C, Liu S P, Horng R H, Liu L, Feng Z C 2012 Mater. Chem. Phys. 133 700 Google Scholar
[81]	Du X J, Li Z, Luan C N, Wang W G, Wang M X, Feng X J, Xiao H D, Ma J 2015 J. Mater. Sci. 50 3252 Google Scholar
[82]	Mi W, Li Z, Luan C N, Xiao H D, Zhao C S, Ma J 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 2572 Google Scholar
[83]	Minami T, Takeda Y, Kakumu T, Takata S, Fukuda I 1997 J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 15 958 Google Scholar
[84]	Kim S, Kim S J, Kim K H, Kim H D, Kim T G 2014 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 2569 Google Scholar
[85]	Kim S J, Park S Y, Kim K H, Kim S W, Kim T G 2014 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35 232 Google Scholar
[86]	Woo K Y, Lee J H, Kim K H, Kim S J, Kim T G 2014 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 1760 Google Scholar
[87]	Zhuang H H, Yan J L, Xu C Y, Meng D L 2014 Appl. Surf. Sci. 307 241 Google Scholar
[88]	Li Y, Tokizono T, Liao M, Zhong M, Koide Y, Yamada I, Delaunay J J 2010 Adv. Funct. Mater. 20 3972 Google Scholar
[89]	Oshima T, Okuno T, Arai N, Suzuki N, Hino H, Fujita S 2009 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 48 011605 Google Scholar
[90]	Oshima T, Okuno T, Fujita S 2007 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46 7217 Google Scholar
[91]	Feng P, Zhang J Y, Li Q H, Wang T H 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 153107 Google Scholar
[92]	Weng W Y, Hsueh T J, Chang S J, Huang G J, Chang S P 2010 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22 709 Google Scholar
[93]	Wu Y L, Chang S J, Weng W Y, Liu C H, Tsai T Y, Hsu C L, Chen K C 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 2368 Google Scholar
[94]	Li L, Auer E, Liao M, Fang X, Zhai T, Gautam U K, Lugstein A, Koide Y, Bando Y, Golberg D 2011 Nanoscale 3 1120 Google Scholar
[95]	Tian W, Zhi C, Zhai T, Chen S M, Wang X, Liao M Y, Golberg D, Bando Y 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 17984 Google Scholar
[96]	Feng W, Wang X N, Zhang J, Wang L, Zheng W, Hu P, Cao W, Yang B 2014 J. Mater. Chem. C 2 3254 Google Scholar
[97]	Teng Y, Song L X, Ponchel A, Yang Z K, Xia J 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 6238 Google Scholar
[98]	Zou R J, Zhang Z Y, Liu Q, Hu J Q, Sang L W, Liao M Y, Zhang W J 2014 Small 10 1848 Google Scholar
[99]	Zhong M Z, Wei Z M, Meng X Q, Wu F, Li J 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 619 572 Google Scholar
[100]	Zhao B, Wang F, Chen H Y, Wang Y P, Jiang M M, Fang X S, Zhao D X 2015 Nano Lett. 15 3988 Google Scholar
[101]	Zhao B, Wang F, Chen H, Zheng L, Su L, Zhao D, Fang X 2017 Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 1700264 Google Scholar
[102]	Chen X, Liu K, Zhang Z, Wang C, Li B, Zhao H, Zhao D, Shen D 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 4185 Google Scholar
[103]	Oh S, Kim J, Ren F, Pearton S J, Kim J 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 9245 Google Scholar
[104]	Kwon Y, Lee G, Oh S, Kim J, Pearton S J, Ren F 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 131901 Google Scholar
[105]	Oh S, Mastro M A, Tadjer M J, Kim J 2017 ECS J. Solid State. Sci. 6 Q79 Google Scholar
[106]	Oh S, Kim C K, Kim J 2017 ACS Photonics 5 1123
[107]	Du J, Xing J, Ge C, Liu H, Liu P, Hao H, Dong J, Zheng Z, Gao H 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 425105 Google Scholar
[108]	He T, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Lin W, Fu K, Sun C, Shi F, Ding X, Yu G, Zhang K, Lu S, Zhang X, Zhang B 2018 Nanophotonics 7 1557 Google Scholar
[109]	Oshima T, Okuno T, Arai N, Suzuki N, Ohira S, Fujita S 2008 Appl. Phys. Express 1 011202 Google Scholar
[110]	Suzuki R, Nakagomi S, Kokubun Y, Arai N, Ohira S 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 222102 Google Scholar
[111]	Suzuki R, Nakagomi S, Kokubun Y 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 131114 Google Scholar
[112]	Kong W Y, Wu G A, Wang K Y, Zhang T F, Zou Y F, Wang D D, Luo L B 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 10725 Google Scholar
[113]	Mu W, Jia Z, Yin Y, Hu Q, Zhang J, Feng Q, Hao Y, Tao X 2017 CrystEngComm 19 5122 Google Scholar
[114]	Yang C, Liang H, Zhang Z, Xia X, Tao P, Chen Y, Zhang H, Shen R, Luo Y, Du G 2018 RSC Adv. 8 6341 Google Scholar
[115]	Ji Z, Du J, Fan J, Wang W 2006 Opt. Mater. 28 415 Google Scholar
[116]	Kokubun Y, Miura K, Endo F, Nakagomi S 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 031912 Google Scholar
[117]	Weng W Y, Hsueh T J, Chang S J, Huang G J, Hsueh H T 2011 IEEE Sens. J. 11 999 Google Scholar
[118]	Huang Z D, Weng W Y, Chang S J, Chiu C, Wu S, Hsueh T 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 3462 Google Scholar
[119]	Huang Z D, Weng W Y, Chang S J, Hua Y F, Chiu C J, Hsueh T J, Wu S L 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 1187 Google Scholar
[120]	Huang Z D, Weng W Y, Chang S J, Hua Y F, Chiu C J, Tsai T Y 2013 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 25 809
[121]	Nakagomi S, Momo T, Takahashi S, Kokubun Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 072105 Google Scholar
[122]	Ravadgar P, Horng R H, Yao S D, Lee H Y, Wu R, Ou S L, Tu L W 2013 Opt. Express 21 24599 Google Scholar
[123]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, Li P G, An Y H, Liu H, Guo X C, Yan H, Wang G F, Sun C L, Li L H, Tang W H 2014 Opt. Mater. Express 4 1067 Google Scholar
[124]	Wang X, Chen Z W, Guo D Y, Zhang X, Wu Z P, Li P G, Tang W H 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 2918 Google Scholar
[125]	Peng Y K, Zhang Y, Chen Z W, Guo D Y, Zhang X, Li P G, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2018 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 30 993 Google Scholar
[126]	Guo D Y, Wu Z P, An Y H, Guo X C, Chu X L, Sun C L, Li L H, Li P G, Tang W H 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 023507 Google Scholar
[127]	Guo D Y, Li P G, Wu Z P, Cui W, Zhao X L, Lei M, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 24190 Google Scholar
[128]	Qian Y P, Guo D Y, Chu X L, Shi H Z, Zhu W K, Wang K, Wang S L, Li P G, Zhang X H, Tang W H 2017 Mater. Lett. 209 558 Google Scholar
[129]	Guo D Y, Qin X Y, Lv M, Shi H Z, Su Y L, Yao G S, Wang S L, Li C R, Li P G, Tang W H 2017 Electron. Mater. Lett. 13 483 Google Scholar
[130]	Zhao X L, Cui W, Wu Z P, Guo D Y, Li P G, An Y H, Li L H, Tang W H 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 46 2366 Google Scholar
[131]	Zhao X L, Wu Z P, Cui W, Zhi Y S, Guo D Y, Li L H, Tang W H 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 983 Google Scholar
[132]	Zhao X L, Wu Z P, Guo D Y, Cui W, Li P G, An Y H, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 31 065010 Google Scholar
[133]	Zhao X L, Zhi Y S, Cui W, Guo D Y, Wu Z P, Li P G, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 Opt. Mater. 62 651 Google Scholar
[134]	Zhao X L, Wu Z P, Zhi Y S, An Y H, Cui W, Li L H, Tang W H 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 085102 Google Scholar
[135]	Zhang M, Liu G H, Gu X H, Zhou J R 2014 Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 14 3827 Google Scholar
[136]	Li W H, Zhao X L, Zhi Y S, Zhang X H, Chen Z W, Chu X L, Yang H J, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2018 Appl. Opt. 57 538 Google Scholar
[137]	Guo D Y, Zhao X L, Zhi Y S, Cui W, Huang Y Q, An Y H, Li P G, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2016 Mater. Lett. 164 364 Google Scholar
[138]	Ai M L, Guo D Y, Qu Y Y, Cui W, Wu Z P, Li P G, Li L H, Tang W H 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 692 634 Google Scholar
[139]	An H Y, Chu X L, Huang Y Q, Zhi Y S, Guo D Y, Li P G, Wu Z P, Tang W H 2016 Prog. Nat. Sci. 26 65 Google Scholar
[140]	Cui W, Guo D Y, Zhao X L, Wu Z P, Li P G, Li L H, Cui C, Tang W H 2016 RSC Adv. 6 100683 Google Scholar
[141]	Huang Y Q, An Y H, Wu Z P, Guo D Y, Zhi Y S, Cui W, Zhao X L, Tang W H 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 717 8 Google Scholar
[142]	Guo D Y, Liu H, Li P G, Wu Z P, Wang S L, Cui C, Li C R, Tang W H 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 1619 Google Scholar
[143]	Guo X C, Hao N H, Guo D Y, Wu Z P, An Y H, Chu X L, Li L H, Li P G, Lei M, Tang W H 2016 J. Alloys Compd. 660 136 Google Scholar
[144]	Guo D Y, Shi H Z, Qian Y P, Lv M, Li P G, Su Y L, Liu Q, Chen K, Wang S L, Cui C, Li C R, Tang W H 2017 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 32 03LT1
[145]	Wu Z P, Jiao L, Wang X L, Guo D Y, Li W H, Li L H, Huang F, Tang W H 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 8688 Google Scholar
[146]	Li P G, Shi H Z, Chen K, Guo D Y, Cui W, Zhi Y S, Wang S L, Wu Z P, Chen Z W, Tang W H 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 10562 Google Scholar
[147]	Guo D Y, Su Y L, Shi H Z, Li P G, Zhao N, Ye J H, Wang S L, Liu A P, Chen Z W, Li C R, Tang W H 2018 ACS Nano 12 12827 Google Scholar
[148]	An H Y, Zhi Y S, Wu Z P, Cui W, Zhao X L, Guo D Y, Li P G, Tang W H 2016 Appl. Phys. A 122 1036 Google Scholar
[149]	Qu Y Y, Wu Z P, Ai M L, Guo D Y, An Y H, Yang H J, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 J. Alloys Compd. 680 247 Google Scholar
[150]	An Y H, Guo D Y, Li S Y, Wu Z P, Huang Y Q, Li P G, Li L H, Tang W H 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 285111 Google Scholar
[151]	Cui W, Zhao X L, An Y H, Guo D Y, Qing X Y, Wu Z P, Li P G, Li L H, Cui C, Tang W H 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 135109 Google Scholar
[152]	Guo P, Xiong J, Zhao X H, Sheng T, Yue C, Tao B W, Liu X Z 2014 J. Mater. Sci. 25 3629
[153]	Hu G C, Shan C X, Zhang N, Jiang M M, Wang S P, Shen D Z 2015 Opt. Express 23 13554 Google Scholar
[154]	Sheng T, Liu X Z, Qian L X, Xu B, Zhang Y Y 2015 Rare Met.Google Scholar
[155]	Yu F P, Ou S L, Wuu D S 2015 Opt. Mater. Express 5 1240 Google Scholar
[156]	Liu X Z, Guo P, Sheng T, Qian L X, Zhang W L, Li Y R 2016 Opt. Mater. 51 203 Google Scholar
[157]	Qian L X, Liu X Z, Sheng T, Zhang W L, Li Y R, Lai P T 2016 AIP Adv. 6 045009 Google Scholar
[158]	Liu X Z, Yue C, Xia C T, Zhang W L 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 017201 Google Scholar
[159]	Qian L X, Wu Z H, Zhang Y Y, Lai P T, Liu X Z, Li Y R 2017 ACS Photonics 4 2203 Google Scholar
[160]	Feng Q, Huang L, Han G, Li F, Li X, Fang L, Xing X, Zhang J, Mu W, Jia Z, Guo D, Tang W, Tao X, Hao Y 2016 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 63 3578 Google Scholar
[161]	Feng Z Q, Huang L, Feng Q, Li X, Zhang H, Tang W H, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 2229 Google Scholar
[162]	Huang L, Feng Q, Han G Q, Li F G, Li X, Fang L W, Xing X Y, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2017 IEEE Photonics J. 9 6803708
[163]	Zhang K, Feng Q, Huang L, Hu Z Z, Feng Z Q, Li A, Zhou H, Lu X L, Zhang C F, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2018 IEEE Photonics J. 10 6802508
[164]	Feng Q, Li X, Han G, Huang L, Li F, Tang W, Zhang J, Hao Y 2017 Opt. Mater. Express 7 1240 Google Scholar
[165]	Xu Y, An Z Y, Zhang L X, Feng Q, Zhang J C, Zhang C F, Hao Y 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 2941 Google Scholar
[166]	Ahn S, Lin Y H, Ren F, Oh S, Jung Y, Yang G, Kim J, Mastro M A, Hite J K, Eddy C R, Pearton S J 2016 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 34 041213 Google Scholar
[167]	Ahn S, Ren F, Oh S, Jung Y, Kim J, Mastro M A, Hite J K, Eddy C R, Pearton S J 2016 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 34 041207 Google Scholar
[168]	Alema F, Hertog B, Ledyaev O, Volovik D, Thoma G, Miller R, Osinsky A, Mukhopadhyay P, Bakhshi S, Ali H, Schoenfeld W V 2017 Phys. Status Solidi A 1 1600688
[169]	Cui S, Mei Z, Zhang Y, Liang H, Du X 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 17 00454
[170]	Cui S J, Mei Z. X, Hou Y N, Chen Q S, Liang H L, Zhang Y H, Huo W X, Du X L 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 067301 Google Scholar
[171]	Lee S H, Kim S B, Moon Y J, Kim S M, Jung H J, Seo M S, Lee K M, Kim S K, Lee S W 2017 ACS Photonics 4 2937 Google Scholar
[172]	Chen X H, Xu Y, Zhou D, Yang S, Ren F F, Lu H, Tang K, Gu S L, Zhang R, Zheng Y D, Ye J D 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 36997 Google Scholar
[173]	Patil-Chaudhari D, Ombaba M, Oh J Y, Mao H, Montgomery K H, Lange A, Mahajan S, Woodall J M, Islam M S 2017 IEEE Photonics J. 9 2300207
[174]	Rafique S, Han L, Zhao H P 2017 Phys. Status Solidi A 214 1700063 Google Scholar
[175]	Pratiyush A S, Krishnamoorth S, Solanke S V, Xia Z B, Muralidharan R, Rajan S, Nath D N 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 221107 Google Scholar
[176]	Zhang D, Zheng W, Lin R C, Li T T, Zhang Z J, Huang F 2018 J. Alloys Compd. 735 150 Google Scholar
[177]	Lin R C, Zheng W, Zhang D, Zhang Z, Liao Q, Yang L, Huang F 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 22419 Google Scholar
[178]	Jaiswal P, Muazzam U U, Pratiyush A S, Mohan N, Raghavan S, Muralidharan R, Shivashankar S A, Nath D N 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 021105 Google Scholar
[179]	Chen Y C, Lu Y J, Lin C N, Tian Y Z, Gao C J, Dong L, Shan C X 2018 J. Mater. Chem. C 6 5727 Google Scholar
[180]	Arora K, Goel N, Kumar M, Kumar M 2018 ACS Photonics 5 2391 Google Scholar
[181]	Shen H, Yin Y, Tian K, Baskaran K, Duan L, Zhao X, Tiwari A 2018 J. Alloys Compd. 766 601 Google Scholar

[1]	许怡红, 范伟航, 王尘. 退火温度对磁控溅射掺锡氧化镓薄膜特性及其日盲光电探测器性能的影响. 物理学报, 2025, 74(2): 028104. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20240972
[2]	宜子琪, 王彦明, 王硕, 隋雪, 石佳辉, 杨壹涵, 王德煜, 冯秋菊, 孙景昌, 梁红伟. 基于机械剥离制备的PEDOT:PSS/β-Ga₂O₃微米片异质结紫外光电探测器研究. 物理学报, 2024, 73(15): 157102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240630
[3]	张裕, 刘瑞文, 张京阳, 焦斌斌, 王如志. 氧化镓悬臂式薄膜日盲探测器及其电弧检测应用. 物理学报, 2024, 73(9): 098501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240186
[4]	宿冉, 奚昭颖, 李山, 张嘉汉, 姜明明, 刘增, 唐为华. 基于GaSe/Ga₂O₃异质结的自供电日盲紫外光电探测器. 物理学报, 2024, 73(11): 118502. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240267
[5]	王露璇, 刘奕彤, 史方圆, 祁纤雯, 沈涵, 宋瑛林, 方宇. $\boldsymbol\beta$-Ga₂O₃晶体本征缺陷诱导的宽带超快光生载流子动力学. 物理学报, 2023, 72(21): 214202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231173
[6]	李磊, 支钰崧, 张茂林, 刘增, 张少辉, 马万煜, 许强, 沈高辉, 王霞, 郭宇锋, 唐为华. 关于Ga₂O₃/Al_0.1Ga_0.9N同型异质结的双波段、双模式紫外探测性能分析. 物理学报, 2023, 72(2): 027301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221738
[7]	况丹, 徐爽, 史大为, 郭建, 喻志农. 基于铝纳米颗粒修饰的非晶氧化镓薄膜日盲紫外探测器. 物理学报, 2023, 72(3): 038501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221476
[8]	刘玮, 冯秋菊, 宜子琪, 俞琛, 王硕, 王彦明, 隋雪, 梁红伟. Cu掺杂β-Ga₂O₃薄膜的制备及紫外探测性能. 物理学报, 2023, 72(19): 198503. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230971
[9]	张茂林, 马万煜, 王磊, 刘增, 杨莉莉, 李山, 唐为华, 郭宇锋. WO₃/β-Ga₂O₃异质结深紫外光电探测器的高温性能. 物理学报, 2023, 72(16): 160201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230638
[10]	董典萌, 汪成, 张清怡, 张涛, 杨永涛, 夏翰驰, 王月晖, 吴真平. 基于HfO₂插层的Ga₂O₃基金属-绝缘体-半导体结构日盲紫外光电探测器. 物理学报, 2023, 72(9): 097302. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222222
[11]	落巨鑫, 高红丽, 邓金祥, 任家辉, 张庆, 李瑞东, 孟雪. 退火温度对氧化镓薄膜及紫外探测器性能的影响. 物理学报, 2023, 72(2): 028502. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221716
[12]	刘增, 李磊, 支钰崧, 都灵, 方君鹏, 李山, 余建刚, 张茂林, 杨莉莉, 张少辉, 郭宇锋, 唐为华. 具有大光电导增益的氧化镓薄膜基深紫外探测器阵列. 物理学报, 2022, 71(20): 208501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220859
[13]	玄鑫淼, 王加恒, 毛彦琦, 叶利娟, 张红, 李泓霖, 熊元强, 范嗣强, 孔春阳, 李万俊. 基于云母衬底生长的非晶Ga₂O₃柔性透明日盲紫外光探测器研究. 物理学报, 2021, 70(23): 238502. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211039
[14]	周树仁, 张红, 莫慧兰, 刘浩文, 熊元强, 李泓霖, 孔春阳, 叶利娟, 李万俊. N掺杂对${\boldsymbol\beta} $-Ga₂O₃薄膜日盲紫外探测器性能的影响. 物理学报, 2021, 70(17): 178503. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210434
[15]	祁祺, 陈海峰, 洪梓凡, 刘英英, 过立新, 李立珺, 陆芹, 贾一凡. 无催化剂条件下长达毫米级的超宽Ga₂O₃单晶纳米带制备及特性. 物理学报, 2020, 69(16): 168101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200481
[16]	赵赞善, 李培丽. 基于半导体光纤环形腔激光器的全光广播式超宽带信号源. 物理学报, 2019, 68(14): 140401. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182301
[17]	裴佳楠, 蒋大勇, 田春光, 郭泽萱, 刘如胜, 孙龙, 秦杰明, 侯建华, 赵建勋, 梁庆成, 高尚. 包埋Pt纳米粒子对金属-半导体-金属结构ZnO紫外光电探测器性能的影响. 物理学报, 2015, 64(6): 067802. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.067802
[18]	刘明, 张明江, 王安帮, 王龙生, 吉勇宁, 马喆. 直接调制光反馈半导体激光器产生超宽带信号. 物理学报, 2013, 62(6): 064209. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.064209
[19]	张孝富, 李豫东, 郭旗, 罗木昌, 何承发, 于新, 申志辉, 张兴尧, 邓伟, 吴正新. 60Coγ射线对高铝组分Al0.5Ga0.5N基p-i-n日盲型光探测器理想因子的影响. 物理学报, 2013, 62(7): 076106. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.076106
[20]	马海林, 苏庆, 兰伟, 刘雪芹. 氧流量对热蒸发CVD法生长β-Ga2O3纳米材料的结构及发光特性的影响. 物理学报, 2008, 57(11): 7322-7326. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7322

计量

文章访问数: 31343
PDF下载量: 1034
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

超宽禁带半导体β-Ga₂O₃及深紫外透明电极、日盲探测器的研究进展

Ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor of β-Ga₂O₃ and its research progress of deep ultraviolet transparent electrode and solar-blind photodetector

摘要

Abstract

作者及机构信息

1.
浙江理工大学物理系, 光电材料与器件中心, 杭州　310018

2.
北京邮电大学理学院, 信息功能材料与器件实验室, 北京　100876

3.
北京邮电大学, 信息光子学与光通信国家重点实验室, 北京　100876

通信作者: 唐为华, whtang@bupt.edu.cn

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Tang Wei-Hua, whtang@bupt.edu.cn

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

施引文献

目录

计量

作者中心

审稿中心

关于期刊

关于我们

搜索

留言板

超宽禁带半导体β-Ga2O3及深紫外透明电极、日盲探测器的研究进展

Ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor of β-Ga2O3 and its research progress of deep ultraviolet transparent electrode and solar-blind photodetector

摘要

Abstract

作者及机构信息

1. 浙江理工大学物理系, 光电材料与器件中心, 杭州 310018 2. 北京邮电大学理学院, 信息功能材料与器件实验室, 北京 100876 3. 北京邮电大学, 信息光子学与光通信国家重点实验室, 北京 100876

通信作者: 唐为华, whtang@bupt.edu.cn

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Tang Wei-Hua, whtang@bupt.edu.cn

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

施引文献

目录

计量

出版历程

作者中心

审稿中心

关于期刊

关于我们

超宽禁带半导体β-Ga₂O₃及深紫外透明电极、日盲探测器的研究进展

Ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor of β-Ga₂O₃ and its research progress of deep ultraviolet transparent electrode and solar-blind photodetector

1.
浙江理工大学物理系, 光电材料与器件中心, 杭州　310018

2.
北京邮电大学理学院, 信息功能材料与器件实验室, 北京　100876

3.
北京邮电大学, 信息光子学与光通信国家重点实验室, 北京　100876