搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

由超辐射引起的迁移率边和重返局域化

吴瑾 陆展鹏 徐志浩 郭利平

引用本文:
Citation:

由超辐射引起的迁移率边和重返局域化

吴瑾, 陆展鹏, 徐志浩, 郭利平

Mobility edges and reentrant localization induced by superradiance

Wu Jin, Lu Zhan-Peng, Xu Zhi-Hao, Guo Li-Ping
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 研究了束缚在梯子形光晶格中的中性原子与高精度腔耦合的系统, 发现由超辐射引起的准周期调制可以导致迁移率边和重返局域化现象的出现. 在平均场近似下, 超辐射现象可以引起两种不同频率的准周期调制, 它们可以由腔场和泵浦场有效调节. 在本文的观测范围内, 当高频调制强度小于某一临界值时, 系统随着低频调制强度的增加经历一次局域转变. 通过数值求解分形维度、密度分布、平均参与率、平均逆参与率以及标度分析, 证明了局域转变历经的临界相区存在迁移率边; 当高频调制强度大于临界值时, 随着低频调制强度的增强, 系统依次经历完全扩展相-临界相-完全局域相-临界相-完全局域相, 这是一个典型的重返局域化现象. 最后给出了局域化相图. 该研究结果为超辐射相变和重返局域化现象的研究建立了联系, 也为重返局域化的研究搭建了新的平台.
    We study a Bose-Einstein condensate trapped by a ladder lattice in a high-fitness cavity. The ladder lattice is loaded in the $x\text-y$ plane and the cavity is along the x direction. A pump laser shines on atoms from the z direction. Under the mean-field approximation, we consider the emergence of the quasi-periodic potentials induced by superradiance in the ladder lattice, which is described by $\hat{H}_{\text{MF}}=\hat{H}_{\text{Lad}}+\hat{V}_{\text{eff}}$ with the effective potential $\hat{V}_{\text{eff}}(\alpha)={\displaystyle \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{N}}\displaystyle \sum\nolimits_{\sigma = 1,2}\left[\lambda_{\rm{D}}\cos({2\pi\beta i})+U_{\rm{D}}\cos^{2}({2\pi\beta i})\right]\hat{c}^{†}_{i,\sigma}\hat{c}_{i,\sigma}$. We find that the quasi-periodic potential can induce the reentrant localization transition and the regime with mobility edges. In the smaller $U_{\rm{D}}$ case, the system exhibits a localization transition. The transition is associated with an intermediate regime with mobility edges. When $U_{\rm{D}}$ goes beyond a critical value $U_{\rm{D}}^{(\rm c)}$, with the increase of $\lambda_{\rm{D}}$, the system undergoes a reentrant localization transition. This indicates that after the first transition, some of the localized eigenstates change back to the extended ones for a range of $\lambda_{\rm{D}}$. For a larger $\lambda_{\rm{D}}$, the system experiences the second localization transition, then all states become localized again. Finally, the local phase diagram of the system is also discussed. This work builds a bridge between the reentrant localization and the superradiance, and it provides a new perspective for the reentrant localization.
      通信作者: 徐志浩, xuzhihao@sxu.edu.cn ; 郭利平, guolp@sxu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11604188, 12147215, 11904216)、山西省基础研究计划(批准号: 20210302123442)、北京凝聚态物理国家研究中心开放课题、山西省高等学校科技创新项目(批准号: 2019L0097) 和山西省“1331工程”重点学科建设计划资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Xu Zhi-Hao, xuzhihao@sxu.edu.cn ; Guo Li-Ping, guolp@sxu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11604188, 12147215, 11904216), the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province, China (Grant No. 20210302123442), the Open Project of Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, China, the Scinence and Technology Innovation Project of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2019L0097), and the Fund for Key Subjects of Shanxi “1331 Project”, China
    [1]

    Marklund M, Shukla P K 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 591Google Scholar

    [2]

    Chin C, Grimm R, Julienne P, Tiesinga E 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1225Google Scholar

    [3]

    Mekhov I B, Maschler C, Ritsch H 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 319Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ritsch H, Domokos P, Brennecke F, Esslinger T 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 553Google Scholar

    [5]

    Baumann K, Guerlin C, Brennecke F, Esslinger T 2010 Nature 464 1301Google Scholar

    [6]

    Maschler C, Mekhov I B, Ritsch H 2008 Eur. Phys. J. D 46 545Google Scholar

    [7]

    Klinder J, Keβler H, Bakhtiari M R, Thorwart M, Hemmerich A 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 230403Google Scholar

    [8]

    Landig R, Hruby L, Dogra N, Landini M, Mottl R, Donner T, Esslinger T 2016 Nature 532 476Google Scholar

    [9]

    Zheng W, Cooper N R 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 021601(RGoogle Scholar

    [10]

    Zhou L, Pu H, Zhang K Y, Zhao X D, Zhang W P 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 043606Google Scholar

    [11]

    Habibian H, Winter A, Paganelli S, Rieger H, Morigi G 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 075304Google Scholar

    [12]

    Anderson P W 1958 Phys. Rev. 109 1492Google Scholar

    [13]

    Aubry S, André G 1980 Ann. Isr.: Phys. Soc. 3 18

    [14]

    Roati G, D’Errico C, Fallani L, Fattori M, Fort C, Zaccanti M, Modugno G, Modugno M, Inguscio M 2008 Nature 453 895Google Scholar

    [15]

    Sarma S D, Kobayashi A, Prange R E 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 1280Google Scholar

    [16]

    Sarma S D, Song H, Xie X C 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 2144Google Scholar

    [17]

    Biddle J, Sarma S D 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 070601Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ganeshan S, Pixley J H, Sarma S D 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 146601Google Scholar

    [19]

    Lanini Y, Bromberg Y, Christodoulides D N, Silberberg Y 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 163905Google Scholar

    [20]

    Xu Z H, Xia X, Chen S 2021 arXiv: 2109.02072 v1[cond-mat.dis-nn]

    [21]

    Wang Y C, Xia X, Wang Y J, Zheng Z H, Liu X J 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 174205Google Scholar

    [22]

    徐志浩, 皇甫宏丽, 张云波 2019 物理学报 68 087201Google Scholar

    Xu Z H, Huangfu H L, Zhang Y B 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 087201Google Scholar

    [23]

    Xu Z H, Xia X, Chen S 2022 Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 65 227211Google Scholar

    [24]

    Roy S, Mishra T, Tanatar B, Basu S 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett 126 106803Google Scholar

    [25]

    Jiang X P, Qiao Y, Cao J P 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 097202Google Scholar

    [26]

    Padhan A, Giri M K, Mondal S, Mishra T 2021 arXiv: 2109.09621 v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    [27]

    Zhuang W F, Geng B, Lou H G, Guo G C, Gong M 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 053308Google Scholar

    [28]

    Keeling J, Bhaseen M J, Simons B D 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett 112 143002Google Scholar

    [29]

    Piazza F, Strack P 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 143003Google Scholar

    [30]

    Chen Y, Yu Z H, Zhai H 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 143004Google Scholar

    [31]

    Chen Y, Zhai H, Yu Z H 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 021602(RGoogle Scholar

    [32]

    Chen Y, Yu Z H, Zhai H 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 041601(RGoogle Scholar

    [33]

    Cai M L, Liu Z D, Zhao W D, Wu Y K, Mei Q X, Jiang Y, He L, Zhang X, Zhou Z C, Duan L M 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 1126Google Scholar

    [34]

    Xu Z H, Chen S 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 043325Google Scholar

  • 图 1  实验装置示意图. 在高精度腔中, 中性原子被x-y平面的梯子形光晶格俘获, 并沿着z方向加入驱动泵浦场. 泵浦场的频率为$\omega_{\rm{p}}$远失谐于原子能级跃迁频率$\omega_{\rm{a}}$, 但接近于腔场频率$\omega_{\rm{c}}$

    Fig. 1.  A schematic diagram of experimental setup. In a high-finesses optical cavity, spinless atoms are trapped by a ladder lattice in x-y plane. The atoms are driven by a pump laser beam along z direction. The frequency $ \omega_{\rm{p}} $ of the pump laser is far detuned from the atomic transition line $ \omega_{\rm{a}} $ but close to the cavity-mode frequency $ \omega_{\rm{c}} $

    图 2  (a) 腔场耦合强度U取不同的值时, 光场$ |\alpha| $随着耦合强度λ变化的图像; (b) 临界耦合强度$ \lambda_{\rm{c}} $随着U的变化情况. 这里, $ L = 1974 $, $ K = 0.8 $, $ \beta = 610/987 $, $ \varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -2 $$ \kappa = 1.2 $

    Fig. 2.  (a) The cavity field $ |\alpha| $ as a function of the pumping strength λ for different U; (b) the critical pumping strength $ \lambda_{\rm{c }}$ as a function of U. Here $ L = 1974 $, $ K = 0.8 $, $ \beta = 610/987 $, $ \varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -2 $ and $ \kappa = 1.2 $

    图 3  (a) 当$ U_{\rm{D}} = 1, K = 0.8, L = 3194 $时, $ \langle \text{IPR} \rangle $(黑色实线) 和$ \langle \text{NPR} \rangle $(红色虚线) 随$ \lambda_{\rm{D}} $变化的曲线, 灰色区域代表着具有迁移率边的临界区域; (b)$ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 0.5 $, (c)$ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 2 $, (d)$ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 5 $时, $ \langle \text{NPR} \rangle $随着$ L^{-1} $的变化, 其余参数的取值是$ U_{\rm{D}} = 1 $, $ K = 0.8 $

    Fig. 3.  (a) $ \langle \text{IPR} \rangle $ (the black solid line) and $ \langle \text{NPR} \rangle $ (the red dashed line) as the functions of $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} $ for $U_{\rm{D}} = 1, K = 0.8, $$ L = 3194$. The grey region denotes the critical region with mobility edges; $ \langle \text{NPR} \rangle $ as a function of $ L^{-1} $ with $ U_{\rm{D}} = 1 $ and $ K = 0.8 $ for (b) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 0.5 $, (c) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 2 $, and (d) $ \lambda_{\rm{D }}= 5 $

    图 4  (a1) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 0.5 $, (b1) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 2 $和(c1) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 5 $时第300个激发态的密度分布; (a2) $ \lambda_{\rm{D }}= 0.5 $, (b2) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 2 $和(c2) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 5 $时第 1100 个激发态的密度分布. 这里, $ K = 0.8 $, $ U_{\rm{D}} = 1 $$ L = 1220 $

    Fig. 4.  Density distributions of the 300th excited eigenstates for (a1) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 0.5 $, (b1) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 2 $, and (c1) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 5 $; density distributions of the 1100th excited eigenstates for (a2) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 0.5 $, (b2) $ \lambda_{\rm{D }}= 2 $, and (c2) $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} = 5 $. Here, $ K = 0.8 $, $ U_{\rm{D}} = 1 $, and $ L = 1220 $

    图 5  $ U_{\rm{D}} = 1 $, $ K = 0.8 $$ L = 3194 $时, 分形维度γ随着调制强度$ \lambda_{\rm{D }}$和能量本征值$ E_n $的变化. 其中, 黑色实线和黑色虚线分别对应了两个局域化转变点$ \lambda_{\rm{D}}^{({\rm{c}}1)} $$ \lambda_{\rm{D}}^{({\rm{c}}2)} $. 图中颜色代表着γ的大小

    Fig. 5.  γ of the eigenstates as a function of the energy spectrum and $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} $ for $ U_{\rm{D}} = 1 $, $ K = 0.8 $, and $ L = 3194 $. Here the black solid line and black dashed line denote two transport points, $ \lambda_{\rm{D}}^{({\rm{c}}1)} $ and $ \lambda_{\rm{D}}^{({\rm{c}}2)} $. The color code represents the values of γ

    图 6  $ U_{\rm{D}} = 2, K = 0.8, L = 3194 $时 (a)$ \langle \text{IPR} \rangle $(黑色实线)和$ \langle \text{NPR} \rangle $ (红色虚线)随着$ \lambda_{\rm{D}} $变化的曲线, 灰色区域表示具有迁移率边的临界相区; (b)分形维度γ随着能量本征值$ E_n $和调制强度$ \lambda_{\rm{D}} $的变化. 图中颜色代表γ的大小

    Fig. 6.  (a) $ \langle \text{IPR} \rangle $ (the black solid line) and $ \langle \text{NPR} \rangle $ (the red dashed line) as the functions of $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} $ for $U_{\rm{D}} = 2,\; K = 0.8, $$ L = 3194$. The grey regions denote the intermediate regimes with mobility edges; (b) fractal dimension γ of all the eigenstates as a function of energies and $ \lambda_{\rm{D}} $ for $U_{\rm{D}} = 2,$ $ K = 0.8 $, and $ L = 3194 $. Here the color code represents the values of γ

    图 7  $ U_{\rm{D}} = 2 $, $ K = 0.8 $时平均参与率$ \langle \text{NPR} \rangle $$ 1/L $变化的曲线  (a) 临界相区; (b) 局域相区

    Fig. 7.  $ \langle \text{NPR} \rangle $ as a function of $ 1/L $ for $ U_{\rm{D}} = 2 $, $K = 0.8 $: (a) critical phase region; (b) localized phase region

    图 8  (a) $\lambda_{\rm{D}}\text{-}U_{\rm{D}}$参数平面内, 以序参量η的大小为填充颜色的相图, 其中白色区域表示完全扩展或局域相, 红色区域表示具有迁移率边的临界相. 其中, 绿色方块对应$ \lambda = 3.183 $, $ \varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -0.2 $, $ |\alpha| = 0.604 $, $ \lambda_{{\rm{D}}}\approx2.86 $; 黑色圆圈对应的是$ \lambda = 4.113 $, $ \varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -0.6 $, $ |\alpha| = 0.607 $, $ \lambda_{{\rm{D}}}\approx4.86 $; 蓝色叉号对应于$ \lambda = 5.069 $, $ \varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -2 $, $ |\alpha| = 0.608 $, $ \lambda_{{\rm{D}}}\approx6.08 $. 这里, $ \kappa = 1.2 $, $ U = 6 $, $ U_{\rm{D}}\approx2.21 $. 相图中的(b)绿色方块, (c) 黑色圆圈和(d) 蓝色叉号对应的参数取值下, 所有态的逆参与率随本征能变化的情况. 这里, $ K = 0.8 $$ L = 1974 $

    Fig. 8.  (a) Phase diagram in the $\lambda_{\rm{D}}\text{-} U_{\rm{D}}$ plane. The color code represents the values of η, where the white regions denote the full extended or localized phase and the red region represents the critical phase. Here, the green square corresponds to $ \lambda = 3.183 $, $\varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -0.2$, $ |\alpha| = 0.604 $, $ \lambda_{{\rm{D}}}\approx2.86 $, the black circle corresponds to $ \lambda = 4.113 $, $ \varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -0.6 $, $ |\alpha| = 0.607 $, $ \lambda_{{\rm{D}}}\approx4.86 $, and the blue cross corresponds to $ \lambda = 5.069 $, $ \varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -2 $, $ |\alpha| = 0.608 $, $ \lambda_{{\rm{D}}}\approx6.08 $ for $ \kappa = 1.2 $, $ U = 6 $, $ U_{\rm{D}}\approx2.21 $. The IPR of different eigenstates as a function of energies for (b) the green square, (c) the black circle, and (d) the blue cross. Here, $ K = 0.8 $, and $ L = 1974 $

    图 9  (a1)$ K = 0.5 $, (b1)$ K = 1.5 $时, 腔场耦合强度U取不同的值时, 光场$ |\alpha| $随着耦合强度λ变化的图像. 这里, $ L = 1974 $, $ \beta = 610/987 $, $\varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -2$$ \kappa = 1.2 $. (a2)$ K = 0.5 $, (b2)$ K = 1.5 $时, $\lambda_{\rm{D}}-U_{\rm{D}}$参数平面内, 以序参量η的大小为填充颜色的相图, 其中白色区域表示完全扩展或局域相, 红色区域表示具有迁移率边的临界相. 这里, $ L = 1974 $

    Fig. 9.  The cavity field $ |\alpha| $ as a function of the pumping strength λ for different U for (a1)$ K = 0.5 $, (b1)$ K = 1.5 $. Here $ L = 1974 $, $ \beta = 610/987 $, $\varDelta_{{\rm{c}}} = -2$ and $ \kappa = 1.2 $. Phase diagram in the $\lambda_{\rm{D}}-U_{\rm{D}}$ plane with $ L = 1974 $ for (a2)$ K = 0.5 $, (b2)$ K = 1.5 $. The color code represents the values of η, where the white regions denote the full extended or localized phase and the red region represents the critical phase

  • [1]

    Marklund M, Shukla P K 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 591Google Scholar

    [2]

    Chin C, Grimm R, Julienne P, Tiesinga E 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1225Google Scholar

    [3]

    Mekhov I B, Maschler C, Ritsch H 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 319Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ritsch H, Domokos P, Brennecke F, Esslinger T 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 553Google Scholar

    [5]

    Baumann K, Guerlin C, Brennecke F, Esslinger T 2010 Nature 464 1301Google Scholar

    [6]

    Maschler C, Mekhov I B, Ritsch H 2008 Eur. Phys. J. D 46 545Google Scholar

    [7]

    Klinder J, Keβler H, Bakhtiari M R, Thorwart M, Hemmerich A 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 230403Google Scholar

    [8]

    Landig R, Hruby L, Dogra N, Landini M, Mottl R, Donner T, Esslinger T 2016 Nature 532 476Google Scholar

    [9]

    Zheng W, Cooper N R 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 021601(RGoogle Scholar

    [10]

    Zhou L, Pu H, Zhang K Y, Zhao X D, Zhang W P 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 043606Google Scholar

    [11]

    Habibian H, Winter A, Paganelli S, Rieger H, Morigi G 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 075304Google Scholar

    [12]

    Anderson P W 1958 Phys. Rev. 109 1492Google Scholar

    [13]

    Aubry S, André G 1980 Ann. Isr.: Phys. Soc. 3 18

    [14]

    Roati G, D’Errico C, Fallani L, Fattori M, Fort C, Zaccanti M, Modugno G, Modugno M, Inguscio M 2008 Nature 453 895Google Scholar

    [15]

    Sarma S D, Kobayashi A, Prange R E 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 1280Google Scholar

    [16]

    Sarma S D, Song H, Xie X C 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 2144Google Scholar

    [17]

    Biddle J, Sarma S D 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 070601Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ganeshan S, Pixley J H, Sarma S D 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 146601Google Scholar

    [19]

    Lanini Y, Bromberg Y, Christodoulides D N, Silberberg Y 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 163905Google Scholar

    [20]

    Xu Z H, Xia X, Chen S 2021 arXiv: 2109.02072 v1[cond-mat.dis-nn]

    [21]

    Wang Y C, Xia X, Wang Y J, Zheng Z H, Liu X J 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 174205Google Scholar

    [22]

    徐志浩, 皇甫宏丽, 张云波 2019 物理学报 68 087201Google Scholar

    Xu Z H, Huangfu H L, Zhang Y B 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 087201Google Scholar

    [23]

    Xu Z H, Xia X, Chen S 2022 Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 65 227211Google Scholar

    [24]

    Roy S, Mishra T, Tanatar B, Basu S 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett 126 106803Google Scholar

    [25]

    Jiang X P, Qiao Y, Cao J P 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 097202Google Scholar

    [26]

    Padhan A, Giri M K, Mondal S, Mishra T 2021 arXiv: 2109.09621 v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    [27]

    Zhuang W F, Geng B, Lou H G, Guo G C, Gong M 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 053308Google Scholar

    [28]

    Keeling J, Bhaseen M J, Simons B D 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett 112 143002Google Scholar

    [29]

    Piazza F, Strack P 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 143003Google Scholar

    [30]

    Chen Y, Yu Z H, Zhai H 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 143004Google Scholar

    [31]

    Chen Y, Zhai H, Yu Z H 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 021602(RGoogle Scholar

    [32]

    Chen Y, Yu Z H, Zhai H 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 041601(RGoogle Scholar

    [33]

    Cai M L, Liu Z D, Zhao W D, Wu Y K, Mei Q X, Jiang Y, He L, Zhang X, Zhou Z C, Duan L M 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 1126Google Scholar

    [34]

    Xu Z H, Chen S 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 043325Google Scholar

  • [1] 古燕, 陆展鹏. 非厄米耦合链中的局域化转变. 物理学报, 2024, 73(19): 197101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240976
    [2] 张杰, 陈爱喜, 彭泽安. 基于双原子超-亚辐射态选择性驱动的空间定向关联辐射. 物理学报, 2024, 73(14): 144202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240521
    [3] 刘敬鹄, 徐志浩. 随机两体耗散诱导的非厄米多体局域化. 物理学报, 2024, 73(7): 077202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231987
    [4] 刘辉, 陆展鹏, 徐志浩. 一维非厄米十字晶格中的退局域-局域转变. 物理学报, 2024, 73(13): 137201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240510
    [5] 陆展鹏, 徐志浩. 具有平带的一维十字型晶格中重返局域化现象. 物理学报, 2024, 73(3): 037202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231393
    [6] 刘佳琳, 庞婷方, 杨孝森, 王正岭. 无序非厄米Su-Schrieffer-Heeger中的趋肤效应. 物理学报, 2022, 71(22): 227402. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221151
    [7] 傅聪, 叶梦浩, 赵晖, 陈宇光, 鄢永红. 共轭聚合物链中光激发过程的无序效应. 物理学报, 2021, 70(11): 117201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201801
    [8] 施婷婷, 汪六九, 王璟琨, 张威. 自旋轨道耦合量子气体中的一些新进展. 物理学报, 2020, 69(1): 016701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191241
    [9] 冯彦林, 樊景涛, 陈刚, 贾锁堂. 光学微腔中一维费米气的磁性关联特性. 物理学报, 2019, 68(4): 043702. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181954
    [10] 徐志浩, 皇甫宏丽, 张云波. 一维准周期晶格中玻色子对的迁移率边. 物理学报, 2019, 68(8): 087201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182218
    [11] 刘通, 高先龙. 具有p波超流的一维非公度晶格中迁移率边研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(11): 117101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.117101
    [12] 陈再高, 王建国, 王玥, 朱湘琴, 张殿辉, 乔海亮. 相对论返波管超辐射产生与辐射的数值模拟研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(3): 038402. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.038402
    [13] 侯碧辉, 刘凤艳, 岳明, 王克军. 纳米金属镝的传导电子定域化. 物理学报, 2011, 60(1): 017201. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.017201
    [14] 丁锐, 金亚秋, 小仓久直. 二维随机介质中柱面波传播及其局域性的随机泛函分析. 物理学报, 2010, 59(6): 3674-3685. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3674
    [15] 李晓春, 高俊丽, 刘绍娥, 周科朝, 黄伯云. 无序对二维声子晶体平板负折射成像的影响. 物理学报, 2010, 59(1): 376-380. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.376
    [16] 曹永军, 杨旭, 姜自磊. 弹性波通过一维复合材料系统的透射性质. 物理学报, 2009, 58(11): 7735-7740. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7735
    [17] 王慧琴, 刘正东, 王 冰. 二维随机介质中的能量分布和频谱特性. 物理学报, 2008, 57(9): 5550-5557. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5550
    [18] 王慧琴, 刘正东, 王 冰. 同材质颗粒不同填充密度的随机介质中光场的空间分布. 物理学报, 2008, 57(4): 2186-2191. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2186
    [19] 许兴胜, 陈弘达, 张道中. 非晶光子晶体中的光子局域化. 物理学报, 2006, 55(12): 6430-6434. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6430
    [20] 刘小良, 徐 慧, 马松山, 宋招权. 一维无序二元固体中电子局域性质的研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(6): 2949-2954. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2949
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4949
  • PDF下载量:  181
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-05
  • 修回日期:  2022-01-18
  • 上网日期:  2022-03-04
  • 刊出日期:  2022-06-05

/

返回文章
返回