Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Shape transformations of opening-up vesicles with one hole

Liang Yue-Feng Zhang Shao-Guang

Citation:

Shape transformations of opening-up vesicles with one hole

Liang Yue-Feng, Zhang Shao-Guang
PDF
Get Citation

(PLEASE TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

BY GOOGLE TRANSLATE IF NEEDED.)

  • So far two kinds of solutions to the problem of opening-up vesicles with one hole have been found. One is cup-like shape found by Umeda and Suezaki (2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 011913), the other is dumbbell shape with one hole, found by our group. As seen in the context of the bilayer coupling (BC) model, the former corresponds to relatively small reduced area difference a, and the latter corresponds to relatively large value of a. The relationship between these two kinds of shapes is not clear. Viewing from the angle of the cup-like shape, whether one can obtain the dumbbell shape by increasing a is not known. In this paper, we try to clarify this problem by solving the shape equations for free vesicles and adhesive vesicles based on the BC model. Firstly, we solve the set of Euler-Lagrange shape equations that satisfy certain boundary conditions for free vesicles. A branch of solution with an inward hole is found with the reduced area difference a slightly greater than 1. It is verified that the solution named cuplike vesicles, which was found by Umeda and Suezaki, belongs to another solution branch (a 1) with an outward hole near a=1. According to this result, we make a detailed study of these two solution branches for free vesicles and vesicles with adhesion energy. We find that there is a gap near a=1 between the two solution branches. For a in this gap, there is no opening-up solution. For adhesive vesicles, the gap will move towards the right side slowly with increasing adhesive radius. In order to check whether the two solution branches can evolve into closed shapes, we also make a calculation for closed vesicles. For free closed vesicles, we find that there is only the sphere solution when a is exactly equal to 1 for p=0 (in order to comply with the opening-up vesicle, no volume constraint is imposed on it), while for adhesive vesicles there exist closed solutions in a region of a without volume constraint. Both studies for free vesicles and adhesive vesicles show that these two kinds of opening-up vesicles belong to different solution branches. They cannot evolve from one to the other with continuous parameter changing. And strictly speaking, they cannot evolve into the closed vesicles. With increasing a, the opening-up branch on the right side of the gap can evolve into an opening-up dumbbell shape with one hole via the self-intersection intermediate shapes. Another interesting result is that for adhesive opening-up vesicles, in the a parametric space, the solutions are folded for a solution branch, which means that there exist several shapes corresponding to the same a value in the folding domain. This phenomenon has never occurred in previous study of the closed vesicles under the BC model. The influences of a on the shape and energy of the free vesicles and adhesive vesicles are also studied.
      Corresponding author: Zhang Shao-Guang, zhangsg@snnu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No.GK201302011) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.10374063).
    [1]

    Seifert U 1997 Adv. Phys. 46 13

    [2]

    Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson J D 1983 Molecular Biology of the Cell (New York: Garlan Publishing) pp112-115

    [3]

    Sternberg B, Grumpert J, Reinhardt G, Gawrisch K 1987 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 898 223

    [4]

    Bernard A L, Guedeau-Boudeville M A, Jullien L, Meglio J M D 2000 Langmuir 16 6809

    [5]

    Sackmann E 1996 Science 271 43

    [6]

    Keller C A, Glasmstar K, Zhdanov V P, Kasemo B 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5443

    [7]

    Seifert U, Lipowsky R 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 4768

    [8]

    Capovilla R, Guven J 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 041604

    [9]

    Tordeux C, Fournier J B 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 041912

    [10]

    Rosso R, Virga E G 1999 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455 4145

    [11]

    Das S, Du Q 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 011907

    [12]

    Saitoh A, Takiguchi K, Tanaka Y, Hotani H 1998 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 1026

    [13]

    Capovilla R, Guven J, Santiago J A 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 021607

    [14]

    Tu Z C, Ouyang Z C 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 061915

    [15]

    Umeda T, Suezaki Y 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 011913

    [16]

    Kang W B, Zhang S G, Wang Y, Mu Y R, Huang C 2011 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 54 2243

    [17]

    Huang C, Zhang S G 2013 J. Shaanxi Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 41 31 (in Chinese) [黄聪, 张劭光 2013 陕西师范大学学报 41 31]

    [18]

    Kong X B, Zhang S G 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 068701 (in Chinese) [孔祥波, 张劭光 2016 物理学报 65 068701]

    [19]

    Ni D, Shi H J, Yin Y J 2005 Colloids Surf. B 46 162

    [20]

    L C J, Yin Y J, Yin J 2009 Colloids Surf. B 74 380

    [21]

    Canham P B 1970 J. Theoret. Biol. 26 61

    [22]

    Helfrich W 1973 Z. Naturforsch. C 28 693

    [23]

    Svetina S, Ottova-Lietmannova A, Glaser R 1982 J. Theor. Biol. 94 13

    [24]

    Svetina S, Zeks B 1985 Biomed. Biochim. Acta 44 979

    [25]

    Ouyang Z C, Helfrich W 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 2486

    [26]

    Ouyang Z C, Helfrich W 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39 5280

    [27]

    Miao L, Seifert U, Wortis M, Dbereiner H G 1994 Phys. Rev. E 49 5389

    [28]

    Seifert U, Berndl K, Lipowsky R 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 1182

    [29]

    Jlicher F, Lipowsky R 1996 Phys. Rev. E 53 2670

    [30]

    Yang P, Du Q, Tu Z C 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 042403

  • [1]

    Seifert U 1997 Adv. Phys. 46 13

    [2]

    Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson J D 1983 Molecular Biology of the Cell (New York: Garlan Publishing) pp112-115

    [3]

    Sternberg B, Grumpert J, Reinhardt G, Gawrisch K 1987 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 898 223

    [4]

    Bernard A L, Guedeau-Boudeville M A, Jullien L, Meglio J M D 2000 Langmuir 16 6809

    [5]

    Sackmann E 1996 Science 271 43

    [6]

    Keller C A, Glasmstar K, Zhdanov V P, Kasemo B 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5443

    [7]

    Seifert U, Lipowsky R 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 4768

    [8]

    Capovilla R, Guven J 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 041604

    [9]

    Tordeux C, Fournier J B 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 041912

    [10]

    Rosso R, Virga E G 1999 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455 4145

    [11]

    Das S, Du Q 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 011907

    [12]

    Saitoh A, Takiguchi K, Tanaka Y, Hotani H 1998 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 1026

    [13]

    Capovilla R, Guven J, Santiago J A 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 021607

    [14]

    Tu Z C, Ouyang Z C 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 061915

    [15]

    Umeda T, Suezaki Y 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 011913

    [16]

    Kang W B, Zhang S G, Wang Y, Mu Y R, Huang C 2011 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 54 2243

    [17]

    Huang C, Zhang S G 2013 J. Shaanxi Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 41 31 (in Chinese) [黄聪, 张劭光 2013 陕西师范大学学报 41 31]

    [18]

    Kong X B, Zhang S G 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 068701 (in Chinese) [孔祥波, 张劭光 2016 物理学报 65 068701]

    [19]

    Ni D, Shi H J, Yin Y J 2005 Colloids Surf. B 46 162

    [20]

    L C J, Yin Y J, Yin J 2009 Colloids Surf. B 74 380

    [21]

    Canham P B 1970 J. Theoret. Biol. 26 61

    [22]

    Helfrich W 1973 Z. Naturforsch. C 28 693

    [23]

    Svetina S, Ottova-Lietmannova A, Glaser R 1982 J. Theor. Biol. 94 13

    [24]

    Svetina S, Zeks B 1985 Biomed. Biochim. Acta 44 979

    [25]

    Ouyang Z C, Helfrich W 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 2486

    [26]

    Ouyang Z C, Helfrich W 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39 5280

    [27]

    Miao L, Seifert U, Wortis M, Dbereiner H G 1994 Phys. Rev. E 49 5389

    [28]

    Seifert U, Berndl K, Lipowsky R 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 1182

    [29]

    Jlicher F, Lipowsky R 1996 Phys. Rev. E 53 2670

    [30]

    Yang P, Du Q, Tu Z C 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 042403

  • [1] Zuo Xin-Yi, Lei Zhao-Kang, Wu Yao-Rong, Wang Cheng-Hui. A model of coupled oscillation of bubble cluster in liquid cavity wrapped by viscoelastic medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(15): 154301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240606
    [2] Duan Cong, Liu Jun-Jie, Chen Yong-Jie, Zuo Hui-Ling, Dong Jian-Sheng, Ouyang Gang. Adhesion properties of MoS2/SiO2 interface: Size and temperature effects. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(5): 056801. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231648
    [3] Zhao Li-Xia, Wang Cheng-Hui, Mo Run-Yang. Nonlinear acoustic characteristics of multilayer magnetic microbubbles. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(1): 014301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20200973
    [4] Bai Qing-Shun, Shen Rong-Qi, He Xin, Liu Shun, Zhang Fei-Hu, Guo Yong-Bo. Interface adhesion property between graphene film and surface of nanometric microstructure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(3): 030201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172153
    [5] Yang Pan, Tu Zhan-Chun. Recent advances of theoretical researches in morphologies of lipid vesicles. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(18): 188701. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.188701
    [6] Kong Xiang-Bo, Zhang Shao-Guang. Exploring new opening-up membrane vesicles of two holes by using the relaxation method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(6): 068701. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.068701
    [7] Wang Cheng-Hui, Mo Run-Yang, Hu Jing, Chen Shi. Coupled oscillation of bubbles in a spherical bubble cluster. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(23): 234301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.234301
    [8] Feng Xue, Lu Bing-Wei, Wu Jian, Lin Yuan, Song Ji-Zhou, Song Guo-Feng, Huang Yong-Gang. Review on stretchable and flexible inorganic electronics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(1): 014201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.014201
    [9] Wang Kang, Deng Ai-Hong, Liu Li, Li Yue, Zhou Yu-Lu, Hou Qing, Zhou Bing, Wang Shan-Lin. Study of the evolution of helium bubbles in helium-containing titanium films. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(22): 226802. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.226802
    [10] Duan Fang-Li, Yang Ji-Ming, Qiu He-Bing, Wu Cong-Ying. Transition of contact behavior induced by interfacial adhesion. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(1): 016201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.016201
    [11] Bai Zhao-Guo, Dong Li-Fang, Li Yong-Hui, Fan Wei-Li. Superlattice patterns in a coupled two-layer Lengel-Epstein model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(11): 118201. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.118201
    [12] Tian Wen-Chao, Wang Lin-Bin, Jia Jian-Yuan. Casimir force, Hamaker force, stiction and snap-back. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(2): 1175-1179. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1175
    [13] Li Shu-Ling, Zhang Shao-Guang. An analytical solution for opening-up vesicle based on the circular biconcave shape. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(8): 5202-5208. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5202
    [14] Xue Wei, Xie Guo-Xin, Wang Quan, Zhang Miao, Zheng Bei-Rong. The surface energy and nano-adhesion behavior of some micro-component material in MEMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(4): 2518-2522. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2518
    [15] Cao Hong-Xia, Zhang Ning. Elastomechanical study of interface coupling in magnetoelectric bilayers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 3237-3243. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3237
    [16] Zhou Xiao-Hua, Zhang Shao-Guang, Yang Ji-Qing, Qu Xue-Min, Liu Yuan-Sheng, Wang Si-Gang. Some new limiting vesicles and typical phase transforms and abruptions processes studied using the spontaneous-curvature model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(10): 6137-6142. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6137
    [17] Qing Tao, Shao Tian-Min, Wen Shi-Zhu. Analysis of adhesion process between material surfaces. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1555-1562. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1555
    [18] Jiang Yi-Ming, Xie Heng-Bo, Guo Feng, Liu Ping, Li Jin. Theoretical study on the transport in metal/organic bi-layer thin films. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(12): 5769-5773. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5769
    [19] Jiang Hong-Wei, Li Ming-Hua, Wang Ai-Ling, Zheng Wu. Exchange coupling in FeMn/NiFe bilayers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(4): 1232-1235. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1232
    [20] YANG GUO-LIN, LI BO-ZANG, LI LIE-MING, SUN GANG, WU JIAN-HUA, PU FU-CHO. FREE ELECTRON MODEL STUDY ON INTERLAYER EXCHANGE COUPLING IN MAGNETIC MULTILAYERS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1996, 45(5): 869-884. doi: 10.7498/aps.45.869
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  5562
  • PDF Downloads:  199
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  15 April 2017
  • Accepted Date:  05 May 2017
  • Published Online:  05 August 2017

/

返回文章
返回